that's so weird, can you imagine not having a dad that helped created you. i think it's dangerous though, it could cause someone to be born handicaped and if god is real, i don't think he would give man the power to create life like he can...they would definately be something wrong with it. maybe they should compare real sperm with it and if it's not the very same, it's not worth trying on someone
Artificial sperm is like artificial males (See manginas). They exist, but yet do not exist. The only true sperm comes from the one which women cannot reach.
The true man is beyond women and their white male pundits who now call themselves "scientists."
While it's a fact that white males are largely to blame for allowing this mess to happen, you do realize that it's now an all-male issue? We can't let race marginalize our main objective, and race always does because it takes the focus away from a solution.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
LOL@White males being mad because women are taking advantage of his need to be "needed" by women. All he does is work, work, work..like a slave to put women on a pedestal. Now that they are there, and spitting in his moronic face, he's angry.
You should have listened to original men when we told you women were horrid. Instead you thought were being smart trying to exterminate original people. Now women are exterminating you, and other white males are helping them!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I'd prefer women stay away from me and get impregnated by "artificial sperm" rather than mine. Simply because I don't want to be tied down to some harpy that is going to be looking for money down the road. Women tend to hold children hostage in order to get paid. They could care less about the children.
women will go back in the darkness of civilization without men. men will go extinct without women, if only there were female without women shit for brain mentality.
Only women came up with this "Strong-Independant" bullshit. Yeah, strong enough to hold the orange flag on a road construction site but not strong enough to lift a shovel or jack hammer. You bitches amuse me. Are u forgetting that MEN provide all the shit that give's u your psuedo strength. A person who is truly strong and non-dependant doesn't have keeping fucking boasting about it like a 5 year old child. Notice how men NEVER say things like that??? I wonder why.
Actually white males helped come up with it, and they support and fund it. Most of the media is owned by gynocentric white males. He's a self-hating mangina.
(3) If all women were to think like these stupid lesbians, Suprema-Cunts or joke-of-an-independant-woman, then the entire female gender would successfully eliminate themselves. FYI: There is NO person on this earth that is totally independant. If that were the case, then any SINGLE person could make and do EVERYTHING I mentioned above on our own.
That is, you idiots speak before you think and when you do u speak, whatever vomit comes out of your mouth is so ill-thought and unintelligent that u make any decent woman wanna shoot you in the heart and put you out of your misery. You femi-cunts make all women look bad.
2) Eradication of the male gender WOULD NEVER happen. Plan to survive w/o water of food? So if you really don't need us - why the fuck don't you rotten unappreciative skanks go to an island by yourself with no men and see how you make it. You'll DIE..
Lastly, the fact that u suprema-cunts run to a MAN every time something goes wrong or you need help such as MALE politicians, MALE judges and MALE police makes your anti-male statements uphold the stereotype of most women.
Actually its those same "male" judges that are the reason you as a man are oppressed. Its those same "male" police who constantly imprison men daily. So its mainly males/manginas, in particular white males, that are against men. Women are partially guilty as well, but that does not excuse all of the pussy begging white males have done throughout history.
Without the white male women would know their place.
The machines used to monitor your next baby as well as computers, the printing presses that make books, the trains and buses you ride to work or the cars you drive (hell, even the traffic light for that matter) the video cameras and equipment u cunts use to make anti-male commercials, music videos and movies...who do you think invented them? MEN. Honestly, women invent trivial shit that other than being useful to mostly women, is mostly non-sense that all of us could SURVIVE without.
s funny how you all claim you don't need men or men can't do anything for you, then why the fuck is all most everything you touch or turn-on made by a man, stupid? Men make sure your asses are safe and have electricity to see, gas to cook, and water to wash your fuckin ass, buildings for your to stay in and make the cell phones you talk on.
"Donated" human embryo? Fuck the political correctness. Let's call a spade a spade, ok? What they just told you is that they used an aborted fetus. Killing a baby to make another baby. Am I the only one who thinks they're gone off the fucking rails?
I can see the eugenics psychopaths from PlannedParenthood taking this over in near future and start making babies with blond hair and blue eyes. "Design your own baby".... like buying a fucking car. You people are sick. In ways more than one.
@oOLittleDevil We aren't lazy, just intelligent. We let the men take on the hardworking roles, which decreases a man's lifespan. Please, do keep doing the "macho" man work. All men do is complain, yet they keep doing the same shit that they complain about. Such idiots, men are.
@ImaginarYxGoddesS Yeah yeah...you go on with you fantasy.I know how girls are,and all of the girls I know are just LAZY as fuck and not too smart either....so YEAH you're gonna say that not every body is the same...but that's the truth most of the girls are not how you said they are but neither do guys.
Its not a fantasy. She's stating facts, especially when it comes to the white male. He's the biggest idiot on the planet. He willfully works for, and defends women, like its a religion.
Black men hardly ever work for women. We sit back and won't do shit. She had better have a damn job if she's fucking with a black man. He's not a workaholic slave like white males.
@Shehasnomorals Well i think you're a girl,and she being a girl too makes you stand up for her,right?Either way,I don't like having arguments over youtube, so fuck this and fuck you too I'm out.
I'm a man, a real man, unlike the white males who sit around doing everything for women. White males are simply "mad" now that they realize women have been using them all of these years. All of their racism against "real men", building debt systems, stealing other people's land, etc. is coming back on them.
Women are doing white males in, and I can't say that I am sad to see it. You should have known better than to come against original men in favor of women.
@Shehasnomorals Wow woa excuse me but I didn't know you were a dude,and yea I agree with you.But you saying to me that all white males are like ''slaves'' ...that shit doesn't apply to all of em, I am making an exception of the rule and so are many more guys i think.....well (lets wrap this up) You're right that men shouldn't be dominated by women and I totally agree (I suppose that this was yer point here). So good luck,and don't let that happen to ya ;)
You have a point. The majority of males, especially white males, are complete morons. I've never seen a male as gynocentric and willing to serve a female as a white male.
Its rather like a trained dog that comes at its master's beck and call.
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THESE SCIENTISTS, THEY'RE TRYING TO WIPE OUT THE MALE POPULATION, BUT YOU KNOW WHAT, IN THE FUTURE, MOST PEOPLE IN THE WEST WILL BE RETARDS BECAUSE THEY'RE WERE BORN OUT OF ARTIFICIAL SPERMS
These scientists are just stupid. Like they haven't smarter things to research for.
What was the point of creating artificial sperm? Maybe to create world without men?? There must be seriousley something wrong in their perception of NORMALITY.
@GreatAussieByte, Scientists are not playing "God". People need to stop comparing God to Science; it's that simple. These kinds of breakthroughs can be used in the Army for men who get injured in the groin (it happens more often than you think). Tell one of them that they can't have their balls back and they'll shoot you.
The government just needs to limit this such that there are no "lab-babies"
this may ultimately rid the need of men in reproduction, and women will flock to it as feminists tell all the free and independant thinkers that this is empowerment--and in the future, women will lose their place when the government turns on them as well and removes their right to reproduction---the world may not be brave yet, but it will be there in a few generations
Ignorant B*tches ! LET US MAKE MAN IN OUR IMAGE.....DUMB B*TCH ! WTF do you mean we don't need men, If a women told me that to my face I'd probably SLAP the sh*t out of her FAKE FEMINIST azz. Took that Feminist sh*t and RAN WITH IT TO THE DEMISE OF THE FAMILY. Dumb F*cks!
@mssquirrely Bwahahahahahahahahaha! Come on now, there have never been any love or harmony between the sexes, we tolorated eachother just for reproduction. Truth hurts uh?
Why do women need men when we have dildos and other pretty women to be with?
You men can talk about women all you like, but at the end of the day you still want to fuck a nice, warm, pretty pussy... Not another man's nasty, shit encrusted asshole.
@AirForceGirl05 your either a dyke or a virgin...either way your a fucking bitch just fuck off up the nearest stairs to you and fucking hang yourself from them,,,your not wanted in this world and your DEFINATELY NOT NEEDED LOL, you were a mistake anyway!
Yea you can say that men are better than women now but the Y chromosone in men are shrinking so yes men well be extinct and now that they found artifical sperm which i know is going to work men aren't needed at all. Men can't give birth that is dangerous and too risky. So what if mice were sucessful they are so damn small and arn't 100% exactly like us.
@Ichliebemusikundybd Men can do anything women can do. There's nothing that prevents a man from doing a woman's job and vice versa. Neither sex is really necessary if you use science to remove its role and give it to the other.
@AirForceGirl05 What's to stop anyone from bioengineering a man with that capacity? I'm sure there are scientists who would be willing to do that for gay couples if it wasn't so controversial. The idea of taking away from women the sole capacity for giving birth would scare the hell out of them.
Are you gay? The fact is that the majority of men on the earth will always be heterosexual, while the majority of women on the earth will always be bisexual. Men don't WANT to live in a world without women, women could honestly care less about men. Sorry, that's just the way it is.
@AirForceGirl05 I'm aware of that, but my initial comment was a tongue-in-cheek comment about men finding a replacement for women as an act of self defense. But you're right, women couldn't care less about men. But that is their biggest weakness because they need men, they just don't want to admit it. I suppose if there's any distinction that demonstrates who's better, men win since they're more humanistic and compassionate that way.
@Ichliebemusikundybd Who says men can't give birth with a little bioengineering? Just C-section the baby out when ready to give birth. Women can be made unnecessary for the continuation of the species if scientists set out to that end.
@Ichliebemusikundybd "In the spritual realm"? , lol please..., females don't have fucking spirits all souls for that matter. Only males have souls and spirits.
Actually most males don't have souls which is why so many follow women. There are very few real men. The men that run governments are puppets. Every law they have passed is gynocentric; they are sugar daddies for women. The white system cannot maintain itself, its consuming itself as it tries to give women more and more for nothing.
Then you can crack open a couple of chicken eggs, stick 'em in a bucket of water and stir it up a little then store it in your shed in the back yard. With the right lighting, some fish food and cranking the Rolling Stones Sympathy for the Devil continuously, you can grow your own anti-Christ.
Scientists should invent ways to create new humans without women so we can all say "Women not needed lol". Men truly would be liberated if we could do that and invent artificial women (cyborgs), rendering women completely obsolete. I think men should do that for our own survival since it seems the destruction of men is the objective here.
@alexpetrunak lastly i am going to block you on here as i do not want to speak to someone as ignorent and retarded as you, you obviously have alot of hate towards women and you hold views from the 50s. i am right and you writing that comment to me describing your false and pathetic views has just confirmed that.
You've pretty much just made yourself look like a fool lol oh and dont expect a reply from me if you post another comment as i have blocked your username and won't see it.
@alexpetrunak lol ok first of all i am gonna say this, you DON'T or SHOUDN'T need sex to hold a family together, a relationship should not be based on sex, sex is part of a relationship but not everything and i am sure that anyone who's reading this would agree with me on that.
Secondly no, women don't make every decision on impulse, when i first voted i went on each of their websites, read carefully through what each candidate stands for and voted for who i think we ALL would benifit from.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
lol its not just for lesbians, men were never needed, men (boys) wank and waste sperm everyday, sperm that could make babies, men have got it al wrong, god gave man a penis to use to create life, not for there ow pleasure, same sex relationships are pure, men rape and are evil and were given a penis that represents the form that satan took (a snake) women don't need men, this is a womans world now.
@cr4yv3n lol just because a woman is not interested in a man does not mean she is not interested in a kid. Sperm bank, adoption and this are all options, we are born with our sexuality.
Oh and also i think this artificial sperm is not just for lesbians but would benifit women who can't give birth to a baby either because of her or the man isn't able to give her a baby due to natural infertality.
@cr4yv3n 5. That article wasn't even about homosexuals being unfit parents as you claim. Quite the contrary, that author even says same-sex couples can be good parents. That was an article about what the author deemed unnatural means of conception (IVF, etc) which she opposed in gay AND straight women in favor of adoption.
@cr4yv3n 6. I never said that children were any better with same-sex parents, I said that they were no worse off, as you claim, and directed you to several studies to support such.
And yes, telling people what they should and should not be allowed to do based on nothing but the sex they happened to be born with IS sexist. Homophobic bigotry IS a form of sexism.
@juliewashere88 The author said kids are not some OBJECT and that non heterosexual couples should ADMIT that kids are not fucking made without a normal / natural partner.
I dunno WHAT have you been reading but those glasses of yours need a check up if you read the same thing i gave you.
And i quote from her:
"If we accept that homosexuality is a naturally occurring, biologically determined situation, why can we not ---
@cr4yv3n ---accept the natural, biologically determined fact that two women (or two men) cannot make a baby "
That being said she says that if homosexuality is natural ( which i have nothing against with, they dun harm me they can do what they want ) they also must admit that NATURALLY , NO, you can't bloody have a kid without a man, or a woman.
You're full of shit and replying just for the sake of replying or maybe out of hatred.
@cr4yv3n Yep, I'm replying because I hate ignorance. How about you read the article you were so excited to show me? I never disputed that two men or two women cannot make a baby naturally. That wasn't what we were talking about. We were talking about whether same-sex partners can adequately raise a kid.
Her objection was to unnatural means of conception, in both straight and gay women. She asserted without support that artificial = wrong.
@juliewashere88 There is nothing ignorant in my reply - i just can't stand the trend of this so called "sex liberation" that is going to fuck up everything in our society just so some MINORITY can be happy.
And no i'm not a religious zealot - so that's out of the window.
@juliewashere88 Your so called studies are funded by pro-lesbian procreation ( however that would work ) groups which brings us back to square 1 since they are biased.
If i tell you, you cannot produce sperm as a woman is sexist?
Wake up ! It's NATURAL and if you're offended you're dumb!
@cr4yv3n Yet again you've left the accusation that all the studies that prove you dead wrong must be biased dangling unsupported as if I'm just supposed to take your word for it. Newsflash: Truth is not a bias. If you're contending that all of these studies are biased, prove it if you wish to be taken seriously.
No, but it is sexist that there is anything a male or female parent must do in raising a kid that the opposite sex can't.
BTW, you might notice that this video is about artificial sperm
@cr4yv3n I was not the one to derail it. You were. I made a comment to the video, making no mention of same-sex parents, and you replied with some homophobic nonsense.
I never said use of artificial sperm was natural. I said same-sex parents could be good parents in response to you saying they weren't. Then you pulled up this completely irrelevant essay to try to defend your homophobia.
quote from you: Actually women who aren't interested in men but want kids can and do already get artificially inseminated. I can buy donor sperm online and have it delivered to my Dr.'s office if I want to. Both men and women can already adopt children who already exist as well.
I always find it amusing how 'I've got nothing against X, but...' is always followed with some shit against X. In this case it's some completely unfounded sexist and homophobic bullshit.
@cr4yv3n deny them as couples so again your arguments shoots itself down.
Back to your reply i didn't pull anything irrelevant you shoved me biased "studies" that any normal human would compare with those from another group and found sick irregularities.
And if you are interested to see how a dumb person looks like - even on youtube...well...
you simply need to look in the mirror more - i'm sure the amount of hate and stupidity on the other side will satisfy your needs.
A person who says "men should be wiped out of the face of the Earth" even has the NERVE to open...HER ( yeah most like a "her" ) mouth and say i am not worthy of arguing?
You're not even worthy of being called human for all i care. You are the lowest of low for what you just said.
Yes i do attack all feminists that are spewing up poison in people's minds.
Yes i do attack lesbians who do anything to undermine any male existence in the world. Guilty as charged in this case.
Yes i like women, attacking idiots has nothing to do with my sexual preferences.
Obviously you are wrong. My girlfriend agrees with me that feminism is bullshit and it's doing now more harm than helping. It has done its job over the last 3 decades.
@FishcakeX By your first comment about "i wish men like you would be wiped out of the Earth" you got a mental issue to deal with.
Also what was wrong with communism , it was all about bringing prosperity to the world and equality ( sounds familiar? ) yet we know how that turned out.
Hey the atomic power was also cool right? And yet for 50 years we were all scared as shit of what would happen.
@juliewashere88 women who aren't interested in men don't have kids - period.
That's how nature works, there's need for two to concieve, nurture and raise a newborn.
I got nothing against homosexuals or lesbian couples - but them having a baby is just wrong. There's a reason a dad is needed in a family and there's a reason a mom is needed in a family. Thinking otherwise is just sick - the state of society now is enough proof of that !
@cr4yv3n Actually women who aren't interested in men but want kids can and do already get artificially inseminated. I can buy donor sperm online and have it delivered to my Dr.'s office if I want to. Both men and women can already adopt children who already exist as well.
I always find it amusing how 'I've got nothing against X, but...' is always followed with some shit against X. In this case it's some completely unfounded sexist and homophobic bullshit.
It's not homophobic at all. If they like same sex, fine by me. But don't raise the kid like that, let him do his own choice, see both sex parents, not two mothers or two dads.
As i said before there is a reason for the existence of both parents ( of different sex).
Love relations =/= parenthood , something you seem to fuse for convenience.
@cr4yv3n I reject the idea that a child needs a male and female parent because it simply isn't true. There is nothing a woman can do for a child that a man can not, and there is nothing a man can do for a child that a woman can not.
To pretend that two females or two males can not raise a child perfectly fine is homophobic and untrue.
And don't tell me to shut up when you're the one responding to MY comment that wasn't even about same sex parents.
But since you're interested in studies, how about you actually look at some? If you'd do some fucking research you'd know what I know, that same sex parent's and children of such DO JUST FINE. It's ok, I did the work for you, check your PM.
It turns out, a parent's genitals aren't actually used to raise extant children. Shocker.
1. If you are lesbian your PoV is blurred by sexist views, thus invalid to this debate. It would be like explaining to a fundamentalist muslim why women are treated wrong in their religion.
2. You needed all those studies to show that a person's genitals do not raise children? Wow you're smarter than i thought.
3. By "just fine" you mean all the disfunctional kids of the current USA?
@cr4yv3n 1. I'm not. But it's funny how you assume that straight people cannot have sexist views even in the face of your own blatant homophobia.
2. I used those studies to show you that you were dead wrong about same-sex couples raising dysfunctional children and to show that it was you and not me that needed to do some research.
3. If you wish to continue to pretend that the children of same sex couples are dysfunctional to suit your bigotry, then the burden of proof is upon you.
And i didn't say straight people cannot be homophobic , i got plenty around me aswell - but it's their choice to think so, so it's not my bussiness, even though i hate it.
@cr4yv3n You sure as hell have to have proof if you want to say that gays shouldn't have kids because it's detrimental. It's funny that you demand that I do research on the subject, and then when I prove you wrong, all of a sudden proof doesn't matter anymore.
I do look at the world, I see a place that can do without ignorant bigots like you.
@cr4yv3n Let's see, you use only your unsubstantiated opinions to justify your bigotry, while I use facts to show you just how wrong you are. Oh yeah, I'M the one who needs help.
@cr4yv3n Random stuff? Those weren't even surveys, they were scientific studies. If you had actually bothered to look, you'd know that. But sure, I'll play ball. You show me one single study that supports your position that isn't done or funded by some anti-gay group.
I only said the world would be better off without ignorant bigots. This is a goal best achieved by education. I never once said that I wished for any people to disappear.
@cr4yv3n 1. That isn't a study. That's an opinion essay filled with unsupported assertions.
2. Is funny that you think that alleged bias is a problem for the studies I've shown you, but an irrelevant factor in the essay (not study) you've shown me.
3. You have yet to demonstrate how any of the studies I've shown you, much less all of them, are biased. That's just another assertion left dangling unsupported.
4. My ability to back up everything I say while you can't is not a flaw on my part.
@warrior4just Oh, you poor, pathetic, insecure excuse for an adult. It must be suck to be so weak and ignorant as to be intimidated by such things as scientific progress and freedom. Do grow up.
why insecure ?...did u get into my head u retard... u need to fucking grow up, i am already a grown up ass man. u understand ya douchesac. next time get the point instead of throwing insults
@warrior4just I don't know why you're insecure. It could have something to do with your inability to spell any better than the average kindergartner while being a supposedly "grown up ass man," would be my guess. If that's not it, maybe you have mommy issues, or a tiny dick. If you want to get to the root of your problems, try a shrink. Here's the thing, you your comment, you made no point at all, and just threw a senseless insult. Why is that OK for you to do but not for anyone else?
are u insecure? coz my ddick is just fine and is begging to slap u and stretch ur shit hole, and who the fuck taught u there is a criterion by which u can define ppl who express their views as insecure u imbecile, is that in psychology, cause psychology isn't science and certainly based on cultural context and mainly speculations. Next time instead of throwing red hearing do critical thinking. a typical pretentious female that does not reflect gray matter activity.
@warrior4just Oh, look misogynistic, rapist insults, with just as poor spelling as any kindergartner can manage. Oh, dear, I must have struct a chord.
Actually, psychology IS a science, and one that operates by the scientific method. You might want to actually bother to know what the fuck you're talking about.
You don't get to whine about "critical thinking" when your argument is that someone is immoral for seeing value in scientific advancement that harms no one. Go jack off, it's all you get
guesss what pathetic fuck..i'm in the science field "phd student", u heard douchsac ? psychology tries to cling to psychiatry to sound scientific, but it is far removed from science, remeber this if u can't revalidate ur finding each time, it's mere speculation not even hypthesis, and there is a reason it is social science/humanities study rather than a science. hey it's a field where we can let the sucker at physics and math to daydream something at their desk. shit face
what is the scientific method that psychology employs, hypothesis testing and least square estimation on a group sample that does not reflect population in the same culture let alone the whole population. Psychology is not a science, if the mere fact of using shallow statistics which is "statistical science" , it does not make it science.
It doesn't matter. In 200 years, men will be having sex with androids and creating children without women, and the few women who still exist will be living in the desert where they belong.
Fuck them. So what if there is never another male child born again. Thay can have their lesbian utopia. after one gender has become extinct and they are longing for a good shafting.. All the males alive today will still prevail. And have a good life and a good time. Fuck it. Let all the babies born from today on be girls.
@missyah101 You say: "Don't worry guys, we still want you around for sex :D"
Fine, then that's all you will mean to men..
There has been serious discussion for this tech to be used as a way to kill off all men...If you want war against men then war is what you will get..If men are not a part of the family then women are our competitor and our enemy.
Women can raise their children on their own..Men should have nothing to do with you....
People will never choose science over sex, not in the year 2009, or the year 2900. This is an infertility treatment, not a replacement for men. Just imagine a world with only women, and car insurance premiums.
1 Totally disgusting fascist science. The Report form Iron Mountain (1967) said this also "There is no question but that a universal requirement that procreation be limited
to the products of artificial insemination would provide a fully adequate substitute control for population levels."
The world may not be over populated yet, but NEVER deny the fact that it's a very REAL thing that can cause major problems. Limited resources and human needs won't be met. Childbirth in some senses is public business on a planet with 6 billion of your own... besides, what better way to prevent suffering than to keep those that WOULD suffer from being born.
2 Totally disgusting fascist science. The Report form Iron Mountain (1967) said this "Such a reproductive system would, of course, have the added advantage of being susceptible of direct eugenic management. Its predictable further development---conception and embryonic
growth taking place wholly under laboratory conditions"
How is that disgusting? The kids born from eugenics won't be any less human... what's wrong with being less likely to get certain disabilities and diseases?
Didn't you hear him talk about the mice bred from artificial sperm? They grew up malfomed and with serious health disorders, perilous to their survival. In order for scientists to test the efficacy of these artificial sperm, it would mean gambling with the life of the person they create. That is the type of evil that belongs in Sci-fi movies, not in the real world.
Well they just need time to perfect the artificial sperm, that's all... and I'd LOVE to know what you mean by "evil" since these experiments don't readily harm you. Are you another religious nutter? Besides, we're animals ourselves.
But these experiments pose harm to whatever potential beings might be created from the process. Reducing the complexity of human life to that of a lab rat is a very twisted perspective in my humble opinion.
This has been flagged as spam show
that's so weird, can you imagine not having a dad that helped created you. i think it's dangerous though, it could cause someone to be born handicaped and if god is real, i don't think he would give man the power to create life like he can...they would definately be something wrong with it. maybe they should compare real sperm with it and if it's not the very same, it's not worth trying on someone
piaybackjunkie17 1 month ago
Comment removed
piaybackjunkie17 1 month ago
i can't WAIT to get a son who's 3-eyed! Or maybe a daughter with no vagina!! Pffftt...human. When will they ever STOP playing Gods....
khan507 1 month ago
They can already clone baby's so women arent needed too. Technically speaking, science is a race by itself.
blackman6270 2 months ago
Artificial sperm is like artificial males (See manginas). They exist, but yet do not exist. The only true sperm comes from the one which women cannot reach.
The true man is beyond women and their white male pundits who now call themselves "scientists."
Shehasnomorals 2 months ago
@Shehasnomorals
While it's a fact that white males are largely to blame for allowing this mess to happen, you do realize that it's now an all-male issue? We can't let race marginalize our main objective, and race always does because it takes the focus away from a solution.
AllPro777 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
LOL@White males being mad because women are taking advantage of his need to be "needed" by women. All he does is work, work, work..like a slave to put women on a pedestal. Now that they are there, and spitting in his moronic face, he's angry.
You should have listened to original men when we told you women were horrid. Instead you thought were being smart trying to exterminate original people. Now women are exterminating you, and other white males are helping them!
White male = Idiot.
Shehasnomorals 3 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'd prefer women stay away from me and get impregnated by "artificial sperm" rather than mine. Simply because I don't want to be tied down to some harpy that is going to be looking for money down the road. Women tend to hold children hostage in order to get paid. They could care less about the children.
Shehasnomorals 3 months ago
Woohoo! No more men needed. The world will definitely be a better place.
BatfoxBabe 3 months ago
those Artificial Sperms not able to fertilize eggs,let along can be consider as Sperms at all by many scientists.
Xaviernos1 3 months ago
women will go back in the darkness of civilization without men. men will go extinct without women, if only there were female without women shit for brain mentality.
warrior4just 3 months ago
Only women came up with this "Strong-Independant" bullshit. Yeah, strong enough to hold the orange flag on a road construction site but not strong enough to lift a shovel or jack hammer. You bitches amuse me. Are u forgetting that MEN provide all the shit that give's u your psuedo strength. A person who is truly strong and non-dependant doesn't have keeping fucking boasting about it like a 5 year old child. Notice how men NEVER say things like that??? I wonder why.
Manoffriendship 4 months ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Manoffriendship
Actually white males helped come up with it, and they support and fund it. Most of the media is owned by gynocentric white males. He's a self-hating mangina.
Shehasnomorals 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(3) If all women were to think like these stupid lesbians, Suprema-Cunts or joke-of-an-independant-woman, then the entire female gender would successfully eliminate themselves. FYI: There is NO person on this earth that is totally independant. If that were the case, then any SINGLE person could make and do EVERYTHING I mentioned above on our own.
Manoffriendship 4 months ago 3
That is, you idiots speak before you think and when you do u speak, whatever vomit comes out of your mouth is so ill-thought and unintelligent that u make any decent woman wanna shoot you in the heart and put you out of your misery. You femi-cunts make all women look bad.
Manoffriendship 4 months ago 4
2) Eradication of the male gender WOULD NEVER happen. Plan to survive w/o water of food? So if you really don't need us - why the fuck don't you rotten unappreciative skanks go to an island by yourself with no men and see how you make it. You'll DIE..
Lastly, the fact that u suprema-cunts run to a MAN every time something goes wrong or you need help such as MALE politicians, MALE judges and MALE police makes your anti-male statements uphold the stereotype of most women.
Manoffriendship 4 months ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Manoffriendship
Actually its those same "male" judges that are the reason you as a man are oppressed. Its those same "male" police who constantly imprison men daily. So its mainly males/manginas, in particular white males, that are against men. Women are partially guilty as well, but that does not excuse all of the pussy begging white males have done throughout history.
Without the white male women would know their place.
Shehasnomorals 3 months ago
The machines used to monitor your next baby as well as computers, the printing presses that make books, the trains and buses you ride to work or the cars you drive (hell, even the traffic light for that matter) the video cameras and equipment u cunts use to make anti-male commercials, music videos and movies...who do you think invented them? MEN. Honestly, women invent trivial shit that other than being useful to mostly women, is mostly non-sense that all of us could SURVIVE without.
Manoffriendship 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
s funny how you all claim you don't need men or men can't do anything for you, then why the fuck is all most everything you touch or turn-on made by a man, stupid? Men make sure your asses are safe and have electricity to see, gas to cook, and water to wash your fuckin ass, buildings for your to stay in and make the cell phones you talk on.
Manoffriendship 4 months ago 3
This is great news. Coming in the wake of the overthrow of comrade Gaddafi, it's nice to know men are finally completely unnecessary.
ChairmanNuke 6 months ago
Articial species.....hmmmm!
pedrom41 6 months ago
Awesome! No men needed!
GirlonFilm1969 6 months ago
"Donated" human embryo? Fuck the political correctness. Let's call a spade a spade, ok? What they just told you is that they used an aborted fetus. Killing a baby to make another baby. Am I the only one who thinks they're gone off the fucking rails?
I can see the eugenics psychopaths from PlannedParenthood taking this over in near future and start making babies with blond hair and blue eyes. "Design your own baby".... like buying a fucking car. You people are sick. In ways more than one.
IIINikopoL 7 months ago
@IIINikopoL I couldn't agree more. It's sickening. These people are making Hitler look like an altar-boy.
pedrom41 6 months ago
If the commenters on this video are the best men have to offer then I say Godspeed to our new female overlords.
RationalFox 8 months ago
wait a sec...Lets say that men will extinct in future and only women will remain ok?
That who will do all the hard work cuz girls don't like to work....they like to be lazy.
Where the world would go huh?
oOLittleDevil 8 months ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
@oOLittleDevil We aren't lazy, just intelligent. We let the men take on the hardworking roles, which decreases a man's lifespan. Please, do keep doing the "macho" man work. All men do is complain, yet they keep doing the same shit that they complain about. Such idiots, men are.
ImaginarYxGoddesS 4 months ago
@ImaginarYxGoddesS Yeah yeah...you go on with you fantasy.I know how girls are,and all of the girls I know are just LAZY as fuck and not too smart either....so YEAH you're gonna say that not every body is the same...but that's the truth most of the girls are not how you said they are but neither do guys.
oOLittleDevil 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@oOLittleDevil
Its not a fantasy. She's stating facts, especially when it comes to the white male. He's the biggest idiot on the planet. He willfully works for, and defends women, like its a religion.
Black men hardly ever work for women. We sit back and won't do shit. She had better have a damn job if she's fucking with a black man. He's not a workaholic slave like white males.
Shehasnomorals 3 months ago
@Shehasnomorals Well i think you're a girl,and she being a girl too makes you stand up for her,right?Either way,I don't like having arguments over youtube, so fuck this and fuck you too I'm out.
oOLittleDevil 3 months ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@oOLittleDevil
I'm a man, a real man, unlike the white males who sit around doing everything for women. White males are simply "mad" now that they realize women have been using them all of these years. All of their racism against "real men", building debt systems, stealing other people's land, etc. is coming back on them.
Women are doing white males in, and I can't say that I am sad to see it. You should have known better than to come against original men in favor of women.
Shehasnomorals 3 months ago
@Shehasnomorals Wow woa excuse me but I didn't know you were a dude,and yea I agree with you.But you saying to me that all white males are like ''slaves'' ...that shit doesn't apply to all of em, I am making an exception of the rule and so are many more guys i think.....well (lets wrap this up) You're right that men shouldn't be dominated by women and I totally agree (I suppose that this was yer point here). So good luck,and don't let that happen to ya ;)
oOLittleDevil 3 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ImaginarYxGoddesS
You have a point. The majority of males, especially white males, are complete morons. I've never seen a male as gynocentric and willing to serve a female as a white male.
Its rather like a trained dog that comes at its master's beck and call.
Shehasnomorals 3 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@oOLittleDevil
Women aren't lazy as much as they are simply taking advantage of the white male slave worker. He has no purpose if he stops working. He's an animal.
Shehasnomorals 3 months ago
@oOLittleDevil Well they will probably use the robots that men created to do all the work
oscie1 1 week ago
This is how western countries are going to collapse, it's just a matter of time. I hope this shit stays only in the western feminized countries
wamnicho 8 months ago
WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THESE SCIENTISTS, THEY'RE TRYING TO WIPE OUT THE MALE POPULATION, BUT YOU KNOW WHAT, IN THE FUTURE, MOST PEOPLE IN THE WEST WILL BE RETARDS BECAUSE THEY'RE WERE BORN OUT OF ARTIFICIAL SPERMS
wamnicho 8 months ago
@wamnicho LMFAO
utubelad100 7 months ago
"jolly well do it" LOL!
3089280288 9 months ago
These scientists are just stupid. Like they haven't smarter things to research for.
What was the point of creating artificial sperm? Maybe to create world without men?? There must be seriousley something wrong in their perception of NORMALITY.
A world without men could not function preperly.
Idiotic scientists and idiots who support them...
brox114 9 months ago
@GreatAussieByte, Scientists are not playing "God". People need to stop comparing God to Science; it's that simple. These kinds of breakthroughs can be used in the Army for men who get injured in the groin (it happens more often than you think). Tell one of them that they can't have their balls back and they'll shoot you.
The government just needs to limit this such that there are no "lab-babies"
historythug 9 months ago
this may ultimately rid the need of men in reproduction, and women will flock to it as feminists tell all the free and independant thinkers that this is empowerment--and in the future, women will lose their place when the government turns on them as well and removes their right to reproduction---the world may not be brave yet, but it will be there in a few generations
SKERLOK 10 months ago
They should try this with female bone marrow stem cells! That would be cool... they would only be able to have baby girls though.
CutePinkLipstick 11 months ago 14
@CutePinkLipstick Lol, I'm not terribly convinced that is a bad thing :P
TheEmpiricalTruth 7 months ago
Regardless of morality or ethics, this breakthrough is pretty impressive.
Eintr3eipied8 11 months ago
Ignorant B*tches ! LET US MAKE MAN IN OUR IMAGE.....DUMB B*TCH ! WTF do you mean we don't need men, If a women told me that to my face I'd probably SLAP the sh*t out of her FAKE FEMINIST azz. Took that Feminist sh*t and RAN WITH IT TO THE DEMISE OF THE FAMILY. Dumb F*cks!
mssquirrely 11 months ago
@mssquirrely Bwahahahahahahahahaha! Come on now, there have never been any love or harmony between the sexes, we tolorated eachother just for reproduction. Truth hurts uh?
Eintr3eipied8 11 months ago
@Eintr3eipied8 TROLL DUD !
mssquirrely 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why do women need men when we have dildos and other pretty women to be with?
You men can talk about women all you like, but at the end of the day you still want to fuck a nice, warm, pretty pussy... Not another man's nasty, shit encrusted asshole.
Women are superior. Everyone knows it. :)
AirForceGirl05 1 year ago
@AirForceGirl05 Speak for yourself, imbecile.
SpelKille 1 year ago 2
@AirForceGirl05 You know what i have to say for feminist that think like you?? GO FUCK YOURSELF.
amilcar60 1 year ago 2
@AirForceGirl05 your either a dyke or a virgin...either way your a fucking bitch just fuck off up the nearest stairs to you and fucking hang yourself from them,,,your not wanted in this world and your DEFINATELY NOT NEEDED LOL, you were a mistake anyway!
utubelad100 7 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@utubelad100
Oh according to whites she's "needed." You've been pegged, by the white establishment, as the useless one.
Shehasnomorals 3 months ago
@Shehasnomorals youll be the useless one when i torture you to within an inch of your life and your left a vegetable ya bellpeice!
utubelad100 2 months ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
@utubelad100
You're obviously insane.
Shehasnomorals 2 months ago
@Shehasnomorals thanks :)
utubelad100 2 months ago
Sterilize all men, and let's go fuckin.
BrooneyH2V 1 year ago
Yea you can say that men are better than women now but the Y chromosone in men are shrinking so yes men well be extinct and now that they found artifical sperm which i know is going to work men aren't needed at all. Men can't give birth that is dangerous and too risky. So what if mice were sucessful they are so damn small and arn't 100% exactly like us.
3jenny2007 1 year ago
@Ichliebemusikundybd Men can do anything women can do. There's nothing that prevents a man from doing a woman's job and vice versa. Neither sex is really necessary if you use science to remove its role and give it to the other.
SpazzzDog 1 year ago
@SpazzzDog
men can't give birth.
AirForceGirl05 1 year ago
@AirForceGirl05 What's to stop anyone from bioengineering a man with that capacity? I'm sure there are scientists who would be willing to do that for gay couples if it wasn't so controversial. The idea of taking away from women the sole capacity for giving birth would scare the hell out of them.
SpazzzDog 1 year ago
@SpazzzDog
Are you gay? The fact is that the majority of men on the earth will always be heterosexual, while the majority of women on the earth will always be bisexual. Men don't WANT to live in a world without women, women could honestly care less about men. Sorry, that's just the way it is.
AirForceGirl05 1 year ago
@AirForceGirl05 I'm aware of that, but my initial comment was a tongue-in-cheek comment about men finding a replacement for women as an act of self defense. But you're right, women couldn't care less about men. But that is their biggest weakness because they need men, they just don't want to admit it. I suppose if there's any distinction that demonstrates who's better, men win since they're more humanistic and compassionate that way.
SpazzzDog 1 year ago
most girls i know lie about being bisexual
renardo3333 1 year ago
@Ichliebemusikundybd Who says men can't give birth with a little bioengineering? Just C-section the baby out when ready to give birth. Women can be made unnecessary for the continuation of the species if scientists set out to that end.
SpazzzDog 1 year ago
@Ichliebemusikundybd "In the spritual realm"? , lol please..., females don't have fucking spirits all souls for that matter. Only males have souls and spirits.
TomRude213 1 year ago
@TomRude213
Actually most males don't have souls which is why so many follow women. There are very few real men. The men that run governments are puppets. Every law they have passed is gynocentric; they are sugar daddies for women. The white system cannot maintain itself, its consuming itself as it tries to give women more and more for nothing.
Shehasnomorals 3 months ago
Then you can crack open a couple of chicken eggs, stick 'em in a bucket of water and stir it up a little then store it in your shed in the back yard. With the right lighting, some fish food and cranking the Rolling Stones Sympathy for the Devil continuously, you can grow your own anti-Christ.
TheItalix 1 year ago
the perfect way to destroy the patriarchy!!
HerrSpieldose 1 year ago
Scientists should invent ways to create new humans without women so we can all say "Women not needed lol". Men truly would be liberated if we could do that and invent artificial women (cyborgs), rendering women completely obsolete. I think men should do that for our own survival since it seems the destruction of men is the objective here.
SpazzzDog 1 year ago
@SpazzzDog
In 2010 scientists have used stem cells to create mice from 2 fathers. Google it.
Women arn't needed to make babies
TomRude213 1 year ago
@SpazzzDog Also there are "female cyborgs" already.....
youtube.com/watch?v=cFVlzUAZkHY
TomRude213 1 year ago
@alexpetrunak lastly i am going to block you on here as i do not want to speak to someone as ignorent and retarded as you, you obviously have alot of hate towards women and you hold views from the 50s. i am right and you writing that comment to me describing your false and pathetic views has just confirmed that.
You've pretty much just made yourself look like a fool lol oh and dont expect a reply from me if you post another comment as i have blocked your username and won't see it.
WesCravensScream 1 year ago
Comment removed
WesCravensScream 1 year ago
@alexpetrunak lol ok first of all i am gonna say this, you DON'T or SHOUDN'T need sex to hold a family together, a relationship should not be based on sex, sex is part of a relationship but not everything and i am sure that anyone who's reading this would agree with me on that.
Secondly no, women don't make every decision on impulse, when i first voted i went on each of their websites, read carefully through what each candidate stands for and voted for who i think we ALL would benifit from.
WesCravensScream 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
lol its not just for lesbians, men were never needed, men (boys) wank and waste sperm everyday, sperm that could make babies, men have got it al wrong, god gave man a penis to use to create life, not for there ow pleasure, same sex relationships are pure, men rape and are evil and were given a penis that represents the form that satan took (a snake) women don't need men, this is a womans world now.
WesCravensScream 1 year ago
Have fun lesbos'
foreskinforest 1 year ago
Britain - Isle of Lesbos
LookingGlassStudio 1 year ago
Scientist wants Money and Nobel Price......They are todays Demons.
sitadriver 1 year ago
And my reply was that this use of sperm by women not interested in men was not normal.
If a woman is not interested in a man then she is not interested in MAKING a kid. She can adopt one.
Then you threw the homophobic card at me knowing that would make you look very good in the eyes of everyone who would read this - smart move here.
Sadly for you i am not, but your incesant stubbornness to use the term is astonishing.
If i had anything against same sex couples i would -->
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n lol just because a woman is not interested in a man does not mean she is not interested in a kid. Sperm bank, adoption and this are all options, we are born with our sexuality.
Oh and also i think this artificial sperm is not just for lesbians but would benifit women who can't give birth to a baby either because of her or the man isn't able to give her a baby due to natural infertality.
WesCravensScream 1 year ago
@WesCravensScream
You do realize women hold power as long as men ALLOW them to.
I don't care how sexist or harsh it is , it IS the truth.
And women use sex as blackmail.
This "sperm-bank" ="Father" is the last straw !
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
This is not about being sexist or anything of the sort, you just bounced the ball into the sensitive part of the yard.
You can be gay, you can be lesbian, i don't trully CARE.
But don't come and tell me that kids are better without a father, or without a mother!
As that article says children are not some damn "product" that every cretin in this world thinks is entitled to just because he WANTS it.
Tough luck !
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@cr4yv3n 5. That article wasn't even about homosexuals being unfit parents as you claim. Quite the contrary, that author even says same-sex couples can be good parents. That was an article about what the author deemed unnatural means of conception (IVF, etc) which she opposed in gay AND straight women in favor of adoption.
juliewashere88 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n 6. I never said that children were any better with same-sex parents, I said that they were no worse off, as you claim, and directed you to several studies to support such.
And yes, telling people what they should and should not be allowed to do based on nothing but the sex they happened to be born with IS sexist. Homophobic bigotry IS a form of sexism.
juliewashere88 1 year ago
@juliewashere88 The author said kids are not some OBJECT and that non heterosexual couples should ADMIT that kids are not fucking made without a normal / natural partner.
I dunno WHAT have you been reading but those glasses of yours need a check up if you read the same thing i gave you.
And i quote from her:
"If we accept that homosexuality is a naturally occurring, biologically determined situation, why can we not ---
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n ---accept the natural, biologically determined fact that two women (or two men) cannot make a baby "
That being said she says that if homosexuality is natural ( which i have nothing against with, they dun harm me they can do what they want ) they also must admit that NATURALLY , NO, you can't bloody have a kid without a man, or a woman.
You're full of shit and replying just for the sake of replying or maybe out of hatred.
Oh and by the way: she admits she is a lesbian.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n Yep, I'm replying because I hate ignorance. How about you read the article you were so excited to show me? I never disputed that two men or two women cannot make a baby naturally. That wasn't what we were talking about. We were talking about whether same-sex partners can adequately raise a kid.
Her objection was to unnatural means of conception, in both straight and gay women. She asserted without support that artificial = wrong.
juliewashere88 1 year ago
@juliewashere88 There is nothing ignorant in my reply - i just can't stand the trend of this so called "sex liberation" that is going to fuck up everything in our society just so some MINORITY can be happy.
And no i'm not a religious zealot - so that's out of the window.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@juliewashere88 Your so called studies are funded by pro-lesbian procreation ( however that would work ) groups which brings us back to square 1 since they are biased.
If i tell you, you cannot produce sperm as a woman is sexist?
Wake up ! It's NATURAL and if you're offended you're dumb!
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n Yet again you've left the accusation that all the studies that prove you dead wrong must be biased dangling unsupported as if I'm just supposed to take your word for it. Newsflash: Truth is not a bias. If you're contending that all of these studies are biased, prove it if you wish to be taken seriously.
No, but it is sexist that there is anything a male or female parent must do in raising a kid that the opposite sex can't.
BTW, you might notice that this video is about artificial sperm
juliewashere88 1 year ago
@juliewashere88 Yeah i noticed what this video is about, you're the one who derailed it towards the sexist problem as i have mentioned before.
You're not making any sense.
Her objection was to unnatural means of conception, in both straight and gay people?
So how is artificial sperm "natural"?
Did you miss the word ARTIFICIAL in it?
Lol but heterosexual couples don't usually need artificial sperm and certainly do not bitch so much about this.The others however...
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n I was not the one to derail it. You were. I made a comment to the video, making no mention of same-sex parents, and you replied with some homophobic nonsense.
I never said use of artificial sperm was natural. I said same-sex parents could be good parents in response to you saying they weren't. Then you pulled up this completely irrelevant essay to try to defend your homophobia.
I've never seen anyone so dumb, even on YouTube.
juliewashere88 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@juliewashere88
quote from you: Actually women who aren't interested in men but want kids can and do already get artificially inseminated. I can buy donor sperm online and have it delivered to my Dr.'s office if I want to. Both men and women can already adopt children who already exist as well.
I always find it amusing how 'I've got nothing against X, but...' is always followed with some shit against X. In this case it's some completely unfounded sexist and homophobic bullshit.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n deny them as couples so again your arguments shoots itself down.
Back to your reply i didn't pull anything irrelevant you shoved me biased "studies" that any normal human would compare with those from another group and found sick irregularities.
And if you are interested to see how a dumb person looks like - even on youtube...well...
you simply need to look in the mirror more - i'm sure the amount of hate and stupidity on the other side will satisfy your needs.
Cheers.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@juliewashere88 men are evil, same sex couples are pure
WesCravensScream 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FishcakeX
FishcakeX
1 day ago
@Sushi4bed I would say men with sexist mentality like yourself should be the only ones wiped off the face of the earth.
You were saying?
Idiots will be idiots...fine believe i don't have a girlfriend - feel happier now? It's nolt like i owe you any proof lol.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@FishcakeX I am not worth arguing with?
A person who says "men should be wiped out of the face of the Earth" even has the NERVE to open...HER ( yeah most like a "her" ) mouth and say i am not worthy of arguing?
You're not even worthy of being called human for all i care. You are the lowest of low for what you just said.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@FishcakeX Thank you for looking at my channel.
Yes i do attack all feminists that are spewing up poison in people's minds.
Yes i do attack lesbians who do anything to undermine any male existence in the world. Guilty as charged in this case.
Yes i like women, attacking idiots has nothing to do with my sexual preferences.
Obviously you are wrong. My girlfriend agrees with me that feminism is bullshit and it's doing now more harm than helping. It has done its job over the last 3 decades.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@FishcakeX What IS scary is what humans - most notably women with distorted views..but too much power ( as always the idiots rule ) would DO with it.
Already families around the world are fucked up as they are. This is not helping - there are....implications.
Oh and to your "what kind of insecurities are you hiding" : this was a very lame attack regarding my sexual capacity? How very refreshing....not.
I am perfectly fine, thank you.
But thanks for proving me you're an ignorant.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@FishcakeX By your first comment about "i wish men like you would be wiped out of the Earth" you got a mental issue to deal with.
Also what was wrong with communism , it was all about bringing prosperity to the world and equality ( sounds familiar? ) yet we know how that turned out.
Hey the atomic power was also cool right? And yet for 50 years we were all scared as shit of what would happen.
Technology itself is not scary.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
That will be great when it's safe. Helping infertile men is great, so would helping women who aren't interested in men.
juliewashere88 1 year ago
@juliewashere88 women who aren't interested in men don't have kids - period.
That's how nature works, there's need for two to concieve, nurture and raise a newborn.
I got nothing against homosexuals or lesbian couples - but them having a baby is just wrong. There's a reason a dad is needed in a family and there's a reason a mom is needed in a family. Thinking otherwise is just sick - the state of society now is enough proof of that !
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n Actually women who aren't interested in men but want kids can and do already get artificially inseminated. I can buy donor sperm online and have it delivered to my Dr.'s office if I want to. Both men and women can already adopt children who already exist as well.
I always find it amusing how 'I've got nothing against X, but...' is always followed with some shit against X. In this case it's some completely unfounded sexist and homophobic bullshit.
juliewashere88 1 year ago
@juliewashere88
It's not homophobic at all. If they like same sex, fine by me. But don't raise the kid like that, let him do his own choice, see both sex parents, not two mothers or two dads.
As i said before there is a reason for the existence of both parents ( of different sex).
Love relations =/= parenthood , something you seem to fuse for convenience.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n I reject the idea that a child needs a male and female parent because it simply isn't true. There is nothing a woman can do for a child that a man can not, and there is nothing a man can do for a child that a woman can not.
To pretend that two females or two males can not raise a child perfectly fine is homophobic and untrue.
juliewashere88 1 year ago
@juliewashere88 Oh i am sorry are you by any chance a licensed psychologist?
Oh what's that? oh you're not.
Then how about shutting up. and go look on the net for POLLS and TESTS ran by qualified people that prove this.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n For all you know I could be. Are YOU?
And don't tell me to shut up when you're the one responding to MY comment that wasn't even about same sex parents.
But since you're interested in studies, how about you actually look at some? If you'd do some fucking research you'd know what I know, that same sex parent's and children of such DO JUST FINE. It's ok, I did the work for you, check your PM.
It turns out, a parent's genitals aren't actually used to raise extant children. Shocker.
juliewashere88 1 year ago
@juliewashere88
1. If you are lesbian your PoV is blurred by sexist views, thus invalid to this debate. It would be like explaining to a fundamentalist muslim why women are treated wrong in their religion.
2. You needed all those studies to show that a person's genitals do not raise children? Wow you're smarter than i thought.
3. By "just fine" you mean all the disfunctional kids of the current USA?
If so then yeah, you're doing.."fine" ( sarcasm )
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n 1. I'm not. But it's funny how you assume that straight people cannot have sexist views even in the face of your own blatant homophobia.
2. I used those studies to show you that you were dead wrong about same-sex couples raising dysfunctional children and to show that it was you and not me that needed to do some research.
3. If you wish to continue to pretend that the children of same sex couples are dysfunctional to suit your bigotry, then the burden of proof is upon you.
juliewashere88 1 year ago
@juliewashere88 I don't have to proof. Just look at the US.
And i didn't say straight people cannot be homophobic , i got plenty around me aswell - but it's their choice to think so, so it's not my bussiness, even though i hate it.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n You sure as hell have to have proof if you want to say that gays shouldn't have kids because it's detrimental. It's funny that you demand that I do research on the subject, and then when I prove you wrong, all of a sudden proof doesn't matter anymore.
I do look at the world, I see a place that can do without ignorant bigots like you.
juliewashere88 1 year ago
@juliewashere88 Ok look to end the argument, you are right.
I really am not in the mood to visit this page again just to debate this shit.
You're right, and i reserve my right to think you're wrong.
At least i still have that right.
You sure do see the world doing a lot better with a lot of people - you sure you don't need a psychiatric evaluation?
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n Let's see, you use only your unsubstantiated opinions to justify your bigotry, while I use facts to show you just how wrong you are. Oh yeah, I'M the one who needs help.
juliewashere88 1 year ago
@juliewashere88 Just because you posted some random stuff there doesn't mean it's valid, i can throw some links aswell.
I took the liberty of checking WHO funded your so called "surveys".
ALL ( not almost, but ALL ) are pro-lesbian only family activists ). Unbiased studies my ass.
Take your freakin' hypocrisy out of here,i'm sick and tired.
I am not the one who wishes various people to be "erased" or "disappear".
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n Random stuff? Those weren't even surveys, they were scientific studies. If you had actually bothered to look, you'd know that. But sure, I'll play ball. You show me one single study that supports your position that isn't done or funded by some anti-gay group.
I only said the world would be better off without ignorant bigots. This is a goal best achieved by education. I never once said that I wished for any people to disappear.
juliewashere88 1 year ago
@juliewashere88
I got a very enlightening link here that i have sent you.
This woman is a lesbian but at least she thinks...which is not something we can say about you.
You just don't get do you?
I don't HAVE to prove my studies are funded by anti-gay or w/e.
I just need to show YOUR studies are biased - which i can by following each and every one to the source.
Case dismissed.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
@cr4yv3n 1. That isn't a study. That's an opinion essay filled with unsupported assertions.
2. Is funny that you think that alleged bias is a problem for the studies I've shown you, but an irrelevant factor in the essay (not study) you've shown me.
3. You have yet to demonstrate how any of the studies I've shown you, much less all of them, are biased. That's just another assertion left dangling unsupported.
4. My ability to back up everything I say while you can't is not a flaw on my part.
juliewashere88 1 year ago
Comment removed
juliewashere88 1 year ago
@juliewashere88
u'r immoral for thinking that...sperm should not belong to women on their own.
warrior4just 3 months ago
@warrior4just Oh, you poor, pathetic, insecure excuse for an adult. It must be suck to be so weak and ignorant as to be intimidated by such things as scientific progress and freedom. Do grow up.
juliewashere88 3 months ago
@juliewashere88
why insecure ?...did u get into my head u retard... u need to fucking grow up, i am already a grown up ass man. u understand ya douchesac. next time get the point instead of throwing insults
warrior4just 3 months ago
@warrior4just I don't know why you're insecure. It could have something to do with your inability to spell any better than the average kindergartner while being a supposedly "grown up ass man," would be my guess. If that's not it, maybe you have mommy issues, or a tiny dick. If you want to get to the root of your problems, try a shrink. Here's the thing, you your comment, you made no point at all, and just threw a senseless insult. Why is that OK for you to do but not for anyone else?
juliewashere88 3 months ago
@juliewashere88
are u insecure? coz my ddick is just fine and is begging to slap u and stretch ur shit hole, and who the fuck taught u there is a criterion by which u can define ppl who express their views as insecure u imbecile, is that in psychology, cause psychology isn't science and certainly based on cultural context and mainly speculations. Next time instead of throwing red hearing do critical thinking. a typical pretentious female that does not reflect gray matter activity.
warrior4just 3 months ago
@warrior4just Oh, look misogynistic, rapist insults, with just as poor spelling as any kindergartner can manage. Oh, dear, I must have struct a chord.
Actually, psychology IS a science, and one that operates by the scientific method. You might want to actually bother to know what the fuck you're talking about.
You don't get to whine about "critical thinking" when your argument is that someone is immoral for seeing value in scientific advancement that harms no one. Go jack off, it's all you get
juliewashere88 3 months ago
@juliewashere88
guesss what pathetic fuck..i'm in the science field "phd student", u heard douchsac ? psychology tries to cling to psychiatry to sound scientific, but it is far removed from science, remeber this if u can't revalidate ur finding each time, it's mere speculation not even hypthesis, and there is a reason it is social science/humanities study rather than a science. hey it's a field where we can let the sucker at physics and math to daydream something at their desk. shit face
warrior4just 3 months ago
@juliewashere88
what is the scientific method that psychology employs, hypothesis testing and least square estimation on a group sample that does not reflect population in the same culture let alone the whole population. Psychology is not a science, if the mere fact of using shallow statistics which is "statistical science" , it does not make it science.
warrior4just 3 months ago
@juliewashere88
i'll leave the fulling spelling to u retard, it's utube, efficiency means getting the message with lil amount of writing.
warrior4just 3 months ago
Seems the society wants to get rid of men.
As a man i am happy to hear this - if they can propell their new "humanity" ( or womanity ) into the future. Good luck to them.
cr4yv3n 1 year ago
It doesn't matter. In 200 years, men will be having sex with androids and creating children without women, and the few women who still exist will be living in the desert where they belong.
SomeRandomAhole 1 year ago
@SomeRandomAhole
lol what a whiny bitch you are,
bosozoku1000 6 months ago
WICKEDNESS!!!!!!
twentyvision7 2 years ago
fucking lesbians will run to this shit too.
SuperbadIsraelite 2 years ago
Oh you know they will!!
cjjaxxon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck them. So what if there is never another male child born again. Thay can have their lesbian utopia. after one gender has become extinct and they are longing for a good shafting.. All the males alive today will still prevail. And have a good life and a good time. Fuck it. Let all the babies born from today on be girls.
ANTIDALLARD 2 years ago
Oh were you born in a test tube? Sorry if I struck a nerve. Cunt.
Sambucca 2 years ago
Science stop playing god dumbasses
GreatAussieByte 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Don't worry guys, we still want you around for sex :D
missyah101 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@missyah101 You say: "Don't worry guys, we still want you around for sex :D"
Fine, then that's all you will mean to men..
There has been serious discussion for this tech to be used as a way to kill off all men...If you want war against men then war is what you will get..If men are not a part of the family then women are our competitor and our enemy.
Women can raise their children on their own..Men should have nothing to do with you....
Red0660 1 year ago
LOL. Yeah. For us who don't got or don't want no more chill'ren!!
cjjaxxon 1 year ago
I'm sure that bored scientists have been making sperm in laboratories/restrooms for years-it's a real hands-on process :)
nightfrog65 2 years ago 4
People will never choose science over sex, not in the year 2009, or the year 2900. This is an infertility treatment, not a replacement for men. Just imagine a world with only women, and car insurance premiums.
Sushi4bed 2 years ago
I wonder how it'll be like when we can create artificial ovum. How will life be when neither men nor women are needed for reproduction?
EvilUrago 2 years ago
Chemicals to deliberately reduce fertility have been put in water and food for decades.
The world is run by Jesuits and they are completely EVIL.
pduffy4 2 years ago
The world is not over populated the problem is there are far too many psychopaths in governments and running corporations.
pduffy4 2 years ago
1 Totally disgusting fascist science. The Report form Iron Mountain (1967) said this also "There is no question but that a universal requirement that procreation be limited
to the products of artificial insemination would provide a fully adequate substitute control for population levels."
pduffy4 2 years ago
The world may not be over populated yet, but NEVER deny the fact that it's a very REAL thing that can cause major problems. Limited resources and human needs won't be met. Childbirth in some senses is public business on a planet with 6 billion of your own... besides, what better way to prevent suffering than to keep those that WOULD suffer from being born.
hedgehoghoodlum 2 years ago
2 Totally disgusting fascist science. The Report form Iron Mountain (1967) said this "Such a reproductive system would, of course, have the added advantage of being susceptible of direct eugenic management. Its predictable further development---conception and embryonic
growth taking place wholly under laboratory conditions"
pduffy4 2 years ago
How is that disgusting? The kids born from eugenics won't be any less human... what's wrong with being less likely to get certain disabilities and diseases?
hedgehoghoodlum 2 years ago
Didn't you hear him talk about the mice bred from artificial sperm? They grew up malfomed and with serious health disorders, perilous to their survival. In order for scientists to test the efficacy of these artificial sperm, it would mean gambling with the life of the person they create. That is the type of evil that belongs in Sci-fi movies, not in the real world.
Sambucca 2 years ago
Well they just need time to perfect the artificial sperm, that's all... and I'd LOVE to know what you mean by "evil" since these experiments don't readily harm you. Are you another religious nutter? Besides, we're animals ourselves.
hedgehoghoodlum 2 years ago
But these experiments pose harm to whatever potential beings might be created from the process. Reducing the complexity of human life to that of a lab rat is a very twisted perspective in my humble opinion.
Sambucca 2 years ago
YOU'RE an animal! I'm human. Black at that! Of African decent even! Exit, stage right! With my hand on my balls for protection!!
cjjaxxon 1 year ago
They still need us for parking cars.
DefaultPosition 2 years ago
we better research the way to reproduce without women in the process ASAP...or we are in BIG trouble. this is not funny anymore...
imbeginner 2 years ago