@biziclop2 so if Transilvania should belong to Hungary because only 57% were Romanians in the census, then the same in England 80% is occupied by foreigners, based on your logic it should belong 30% to India, 30 to Pakistan, and 10 to Nigeria !!
@claireclark69 I'm only saying people are not a herd of goats being traded one day from an owner to another. Whatever is the population, the area and its people, towns, cities have their own history. Borders of Hungary in 1910 were more or less the same than a thousand years ago, that is quite unique in itself already, not to mention the music, the language, 80-90% Hungarian cities, etc. All of a sudden, everything became Romania(n). We could have been best friends but it's fooked up now foevah
@biziclop2 you should learn about romanian history , the tracians who lived there were our ancestors. after the war between romans and tracians, 101-102 / 105-106 , our grounds became rome's territory and following their path we became romanians , we ARE the followers of rome !
@9DMikke "the tracians who lived there were our ancestors"
Yes of course, and Traianus, who was the father of all Rumanians, yeah...regardless of his Hispanic origin, not to mention he was a master killer of barbarian Dacians...yes I know a lot about Rumanian history. Always brings me a good laugh when I'm sad.
Not anymore, I can understand that, after the big deal. It's normal for thieves to keep silent, hoping things would be forgotten forever. And you've been doing pretty good, I give you that, but it's rather our fault. Communists and so-called democrats did not care too much in the last 60 years. But I have bad news, things just began to change.
@biziclop2 If you say so... I just don't care what you think, and I am sure when others will want to take over Romania, we will be waiting here with guns, fight and win like we (almost) always did. Have a pleasant day and bye-bye.
@JamesThomson09 You will not have any chance to fight. this would be a simple peace teatment. Just like it was in Trianon. One day you're in Romania, next morning wake up in Hungary. You will all know how it feels.
HM The Queen has excellent health and consequently will probably live longer than her dear mother. After her death (& we sincerely hope that will not be for at least another 15 years) William will be ideally suited to succeed her. Sadly, TAMPAX charles and his pox raddled camilla whore are totally unsuitable and fortunately as there is some doubt regarding the legality of their ‘marriage’ they will eventually fade away or preferably soon be blown up by some third world terrorists!
@chiciu no, we dont need prince fkn Charles to come save Romania.Are u kidding me?What about King MIchael, the real king of Romania? U can't run a country just cuz ur grandfathers cousin is somewhat related to you.
he loves the gold-mines of Transylvania, which was torn apart from Hungarian Kingdom. 1915, the 1870's founded rumania asked for HK countrypart Transylvania. the english royal family agreed IF they've could get their hands on Europes No 1, world No 2 gold-mines. France also joined the "agreement".
when romania ratted again in WWII and "joined" SU, GB and France could not get gold from mines (iron curtain etc.). they want the gold badly now.. (Veresbánya, Nagybánya)
What a tragic embarrassment Charles must be for his parents by cavorting with the despicable Camilla. Various depraved telephone calls are published where Charles states he wants to be whore Camillas TAMPAX as he was too stupid to use a secure line. Then the legality of his ‘marriage’ is questionable as this was not undertaken by Anglican clergy as required under English law for members of the Royal family. The sooner these two wanton parasites are removed from the face of the earth the better!
@georgikamakedonu If what you say is true,then at least a quarter of romanian population must be gypsy,meaning that at least six millions gypsies live in Romania! That's not just a absurdity but one of the most stupid thing i ever read!
The appearance of the camilla whore is really disgusting. She certainly cannot walk like a lady; her angular gait is more like one might expect from a street prostitute after a ‘heavy’ night. Her obvious dropped stomach and breasts are quite vulgar and repulsive. Apparently latest reports indicate she has ‘coordination issues’ and often ‘babbles nonsense’ to anyone around with a vacant senile composure. Probably the heavy drinking, cigarettes and earlier acquired STD’s have taken their toil.
Its rather pitiable that parasite tampax charles finds this toxic vulgar witch camilla appealing. Bizarrely certain men do find coarse uncouth prolific prostitutes such as this sexually gratifying but its particularly deplorable when DUE TO HER HIGHLY PROMISCUOUS PAST EVEN THE FATHER OF CAMILLAS CHILDREN IS QUESTIONABLE. Only a few years ago the police commissioner stated he could not protect charles if the crowd turned nasty & dear old ladies actually threw bread rolls at the vile whore camilla
The assets of the Duchy of Cornwall should be sequestrated. There is a legal requirement that beneficiaries must only be direct blood relatives of George 3rd and there is considerable doubt regarding Queen Victoria’s dubious parentage. Clear DNA evidence should be demanded and if not proven the entire assets should be repaid to the nation. As that would render idiot inbred charles insolvent it will be interesting to see how long the whore camilla and charles sycophants remain around after that!
Its particularly sad that we have these PARASITES around FIRSTLY WE HAVE CHARLES WHOS CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED HE HAS MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AND HOW TOTALLY UNSUITABLE HE WOULD BE TO SUCCEED HIS MOTHER. Then worst of all we have a vile ugly repulsive Syphilis/STD raddled old whore camilla freeloading on the country serving no useful purpose. This pair both need to be completely eradicated before they totally destroy the monarchy. Clearly only William as Princess Diana’s son is suitable to continue.
CAMILLA LOOKS VILE AND WRETCHED, DRESSING HER IN GOOD CLOTHES IS LIKE GARNISHING A FESTERING TURD. CAMILLA IS RADDLED WITH TOO MUCH DRINK, FORMER SEXUAL DISEASES AND CIGARETTES. SHE NOW OFTEN BABBLES NONSENCE WHEN MEETING PEOPLE TO SUCH AN EXTENT SOME THINK SHE IS GOING SENILE. I HAVE NO DOUBT CAMILLA MAY APPEAR “FRIENDLY” I UNDERSTAND MOST OLD WHORES AND OLD DOGS ARE.
This pair both need to be completely eradicated before they totally destroy the monarchy.
This is the story of a pathetic weak man, who enjoyed an experienced womans bedroom skills and this vile poisonous woman had the ability to manipulate the weak man. Charles also obviously didn't think camilla as wifely material in the seventies. IF he did he wouldn't have used her like a common prostitute at Broadlands that Uncle Mountbatten graciously supplied for them for trysts. Charles apparently listened to and agreed with Mountbatten's assessment of Camilla as only prostitute material
The only STD RADDLED FILTH here is you and that disgusting POX infested camilla whore parasite you keep supporting! You know it will not be long before some third world terrorist of or similar ‘sanitises’ the creature and blows it away just like uncle dickie! Furthermore, every time you write filth from your vile little Manchester slum regarding Princess Diana I will respond and advertise TENFOLD about either you, the vile camilla wore and your various double incontinence issues!
Its particularly sad that we have these PARASITES around. FIRSTLY WE HAVE CHARLES WHOS CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED HE HAS MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AND HOW TOTALLY UNSUITABLE HE WOULD BE TO SUCCEED HIS MOTHER. Then worst of all we have a vile ugly repulsive Syphilis/STD raddled old whore camilla freeloading on the country serving no useful purpose. This pair both need to be completely eradicated before they totally destroy the monarchy. Clearly only William as Princess Diana’s son is suitable to continue.
Members of the Royal family are excepted from the provisions of the Marriage Act 1949, and their marriages in England and Wales MUST be performed by Anglican clergy. There would, however, be no obstacle to The Prince of Wales re-marrying in Scotland (as did his sister The Princess Royal) where the Royal Family are not excepted from the provisions of the Scottish Marriage legislation. CHARLES MARRIAGE IS ILLEGAL BECAUSE HE REMARRIED IN ENGLAND AND HE WAS AWARE OF IT WHEN HE MARRIED WHORE CAMILLA
the country with the most gipsys from europe in numbers are the hungayrians with 7 million gipsys official romania has 2 millions so europe has 12 millions gypsys who got 600 years ago as slaves and now they want us to take care of all europe what a shame!!! We did the best for gipsys, jews, tatars or slavic people, so who is the moral country in the world? Romania is:
you fuck heads saying Romanians are gypsies. alright, for example, listen out: so why did HITLER choose to take Romania as a full ALLY and fight together against bolshevism, and not wipe it out and take it over entirely - as he did with all Slavic nations around Romania??? Romanian army was crap, but still... eh? I'm not defending Hitler (he was a psycho - but why would Hitler -- HITLER, the ultimate RASIST and gypsy exterminator , would take a 'Gypsy' nation as allies?? haha!! u fuck heads!
Iroically the huns used that alliance with uncle Adi to claim back the North, partially they even got it( I think Arad that was) You'd better watch yur rear now boy.That nice neighbour of yours says he's claiming half yur country 'back'. And those who do will be elected nxt year, did you know that.? Course they won't call it annexation...rural self gouvernment sounds much better. That does EU for you.
@shooterbob65 "That does EU for you" - that's why Romanians should SPIT on the EU.EU is just another artificial "superpower" (like the Soviet Union/Russian Fed, the US, the Commonwealth) created to protect the interests of a few extremely rich people who can manipulate millions of people through the globalization of laissez-faire capitalist economy, inter-ethnic wars & protection of terrorists, financial meltdowns (bailouts), illegal wars and invasions in foreign countries, plots of assasination
@Dannoo007 man,chill,all that faggots out there who are sayin' romanians are gypsies dont mean it...they just dont have anything else to say bad about us,so they say shits in order to look better...so,everytime an italian,hunGAYrian or albanian cocksucker says to me that i`m a gypsie,that`s the ultimate sign of impotence from them...fuck all romanian haters.
ROMANii Nu au invadat/ocupat sau furat de la nimeni. Turcii, Rusii, Germanii, Austro-Ungarii (+ chiar Englezii) au furat de la noi. Noi am eliberat alte popoare. Imperiul BRITanic a furat din: Europa, Asia, Africa, etc nu au muncit niciodata. Acum UK este DECAZUT(a) nu ca noi din saracie dar de trait bine, furat prea mult. ENGLEZoaicele albe si barbatii lor sunt cei mai: PERVERSi, PEDOfili, drogati, inculti, alcoolici, lenesi. In anglia au cele mai multe cazuri deSIDA, boli VENERICE, divort...
Calling romanians gypsies is like calling americans niggers. 10% of americans are black. 8-10% of people in romania are gypsies. Only the uneducated would say that romanians are a nation of gypsies. Oh, by the way , taliking about gypsies; England is FULL of pakis and indians and blacs, France is the same, full of algerians and morrocons. If you wanna cal some country "Gypsyland" just say: ENGAND!
@TheStiffmeister14 Gypsies should be departed in India , where they belong from , and if this will happen , u shall see that Romania would rise in every way : social , economic , etc ... - of course , must get rid of the corrupted parliment assholes .
@lopataro dude , i live in Romania and in some regions of the country ... the gypsies are a majority ... Ask anyone else . In the city of Constanta (as an example) , about 60% or less are Romanians . There are a lot of gypsies and other ethnic cultures .
@georgikamakedonu There is no region in Romania with Gypsy majority.Gypsies have some streets or sometimes an entire neighborhood in a city or village but that's all.Go in any city center you like and you will see some 100 Romanians and a group of 4-5 Gypsy.That's the real percentage of Gypsies maximum 5 %.Maybe you are obssesed with Gipsies and noticed them imediately but you forgot to count the Romanians around.Or you're just interested in spreading lies about Romania.
@MrCraiessou oh , dude , i am telling you , those statistics are not right , and the "100 romanians and 4-5 gypsy" ain't right , its like 100 Ro and 20-25 gypsi , that is how it is in Constanta (at least) . But I won't argue with you anymore , everyone got his opinion , free worlds wtf !
@georgikamakedonu i used to live in Constanta,I go in Constanta every year,and I know well all Dobrogea country side.The Gypsies are very noticeable by their colour,clothes,sometimes behaviour,they are very 'sparkling' that's why you believe you see them evrywhere but make yourself a favour,go to an average boulevard and look at the people... you will see an ocean of Romanians and just a group or two of few Gypsies. F.ex.the NGO's counted this year Gypsies in Oltenia and they are 5% of oltenians
@MrCraiessou "There is no region in Romania with Gypsy majority."
just see the "beautiful" bucharest. + aids (hiv+), roving wild dogs, and street-kids capitol.
by the way where the ottoman empire ruled for more than 300ys its sadly natural that there are many uncivilized gipsies. most of them are thieves, criminals as their ancestors had been too, centuries before.
@kockasfuzetlapunyul No way ,Hungarian kid,that.s what you want to see from beautiful Bucharest,that.s what your stupid propaganda wants to show from our capital city,Don.t worry,boy,I saw lots of Gypsies and beggers in Budapest.,in every capital city there are beggers plus the West has lots of drug-addicted,filthy prostitutes,paria afro-asian immigrants with huge social problems - just look at yourselfs and leave Bucharest alone.Not to mention that you are the reservoir of HIV,more than Africa
@MrCraiessou the only kid here is probably you. bucharest is still a large town. there are only soc-real buildings, few megalomaniac ceaucescu-era style official buildings, and plazas. that's not much. most of the gipsies who beg and commit other crimes are from "old"-romania (though romania is relatively new, compared to Hungary, and most of the european countries). deal with it.
and google about the rest: hiv bucharest; street-kids bucharest; romanian beggars
@kockasfuzetlapunyul And what is Budapest?a small town with some megalomaniac habsburgic bulidings IN DECAY,a copy-paste palace after London Parliament palace,lots of drunkards,lots of whores exposing their vaginas in pictures everywhere,lots of ugly Gypsies beaten by lots of ugly Hungarian skin-heads caricatures.And beside that? Cornfield,pusta,hungarian gypsies and peasants.I don.t need to google your filthy propaganda to find out things about my beautiful country Romania
@MrCraiessou before habsburg "house", many other kings were throwned in Hungary. cause its an old country. as a christian kingdom it existed from 1000 to 1946. so we have historical buildings. its natural that most of the buildings remained from the dualist era. but its certainly not like the soc-real style + ceaucescu's few megalomaniac trash buildings in romania. don't forget that except soc-real "residential" areas everything in Transylvania is hungarian, german built.
@kockasfuzetlapunyul even in unrenovated state those look better than bucharest..
what i've told you is true. and you seriously think that if people search on google HIV bucharest, or street-kids bucharest the found links are hungarian propaganda? are you that stupid really? bucharest is not a beautiful city. it can be in the future. but now it is not. i think even some of the people living there could openly admit this is fact.
@kockasfuzetlapunyul Like I care about your piles of ugliness!too bad you cannnot move them in your pusta,that we'll teach you a lesson about the evilness of building your ugly houses and churches in stolen land,in Romanian land of Transylvania.I don't care if Hungary is old or new,just stay in your country and leave Romania alone!Bye bye,go trolling hungarian videos,Magyar silly boy.
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , you must be so envious. You basically have nothing in Hungary outside porn industry. The only thing at which Hungary is ahead of Romania is about 100E for the minimum salary. In rest nothing bro, even the palace of Parliament is copied after the one from Britain :D Say hello to the Madjari people from Kazakhstan my dear lolgarian ;)
@gogoasacenusie yeah the situation in Hungary is better than in Romania after Hungarian Kingdom (Hungary) 2/3 of its territories, 1/3rd of its ethnic hungarian population, even the remnant cities, goods were destructed in the world wars twice at about 80-90%s, the gold reserves had been stolen by germans, than from them by USA in WWII. after that 1956 happened. and so on.
meanwhile romania joined in wars you have never won (pretending as you've not been defeated and even signed the peace
@kockasfuzetlapunyul treaty.. you've got Erdély/Transylvania from french and english who got gold mines of Transylvania in exchange.
so everywhere, everytime (not all the time, romanian kingdom was only formed in 1882 and Transylvania was HK countrypart not romanian) despite you had been not fighted or even seriously defeated, you gained unbelievable wealth as a country. still you are no better than Hungary (HK 1000-1946). which was robbed several times. you are pathetic.
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , by the way, i noticed you have some kind of sick desperation in your posts. It's probably triggered by inferiority complexes. The funniest part of all is the "3 options available for you" i have to admit, it just cracked me up when i have read them. I remember you buddy, i know i've talked to you before. By the way, you should search the "Wild Carpathia" trailer where Prince Charles says he's descendent of Vlad the Impaler. The full movie will be out on the market soon.
@gogoasacenusie indeed triggered by inferiority complexes. complexes of mostly chauvinist, great romanian, slavic nationalists. because most of them are aware that historical facts are not really equal to their nationalist propaganda.
the funniest part that those are based on the following facts. 1. before 1867, romanian kingdom not existed. 2. before 1920.6.04. Transylvania was not the part of rumania 3. during WWII HK gained back northern parts of Transylvania, with hungarian majority.
@gogoasacenusie yeah. and william is northern irish. the queen is indian whatsmore among english royal family the are australians (even aboriginals). you really don't realise why that prince charles is telling those things. why all the royal family members are visiting their "interests". they mostly don't give a shit about people. hello, they are elites. not workers. though sometimes they have to work. visiting, saying things to keep the money, keep the wealth. the "common wealth".
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , don't be envious my little madjari lolgarian friend ;;) Buddy, seriosly now. Who on this planet would believe that Transylvania was inhabited since the beggining by Hungarians when in your own hungarian oldest chronicle is written it was inhabited by Romanians :D And the chronicle even has archeological correspondence? And there are about a dozen other chronicles saying the same things? Cmon buddy, we've talked again, it is futile to debate against a fact... :P
@gogoasacenusie@gogoasacenusie i wonder why you didn't save the funny term lolgarian (derived from mine usage for you lolmanians /not all romanians, not all in romania believes that romania is the oldest country on earth.. founded by proto-romanians (42 000 BC) and roman descendants.. ROFLMANIA ;-) ) for bulgarians.
and who said that transylvania was not habited? :-o the only thing i've ever said (based on facts) that your descendants (you claim to be romans LOL, if that might be true, then
@kockasfuzetlapunyul albanians (who romanian nationalist tend to at least "not like" refusing to admit their REAL conneczion with romans) are mega-brutal-über-romans. you were their neighbours in moesia. only lolmanian problem with this fact, that moesia was not in the carpatian basin, where transylvania is. :-D).
we hungarians founded HK, which had as countrypart transylvania. the first vlachs appeared there in 13th century, asked our king to travel through(!) HK to the later on moldavia.
@kockasfuzetlapunyul the territory which later became moldavia was inhabited in 800s by hungarians, cumans (with hungarian help cumans made up a pagan kingdom) - the cuman kingdom was forceful till the mongol invasion of europe. after that it declined and in 1356 the hungarian(!) king ordered the restoration of a country next to HK's n-eastern borders. that time half of the leaders was cumans (with strong hungarian relations, some even ethnic hungarians, they've slowly left moldavia principality
@kockasfuzetlapunyul and moved to Transylvania - those who had right to bring with them their peasents, workers were the so called "kenéz", who himself had to be not vlach (cause the peasents in cuman kingdom were those vlachs and their descendants who asked permission to cross HK from the once moesia), but hungarian-cuman. /thats the cause why the Hunyadis were clearly not vlachs. John Hunyadi's father was kenéz (you romanians derived this title as "cneaz"). only the kenéz had the right to
@kockasfuzetlapunyul let vlachs settle down in HK. otherwise it was prohibited. (being pagans, not fighters, but workers).
the remnant leaders of cuman kingdom were vlachs, vlachs like most of the peasents in cumanian kingdom for 100ys. and slowly vlachs became the majority of peasantry in transylvania from 14th century till 19th. though hungarian-secler and saxon (german) nobility never allowed in fights not involved, hundred years later settled vlachs to gain nobility.
Even writing it it's a logical fallacy lol. I don't like albanians btw ( because they're muslims...). I like Bulgarians, Serbians and even Hungarians. As hard as it may be to believe, i have szekely relatives ( my grandma ). And i know a bit hungarian....The problem is, i have 0 tolerance for bullshit and morons. The trollus idiotus has no ethnicity, no color and no religion. But i do enjoy talking to them lol
@gogoasacenusie and you are citating that sentence from who exactly? and also why? your way of interpreting was rather a phallosy..
that's interesting about your connections. i've only found on internet (yt) true trollmanians who don't know a single historical fact. those who know (but misinterpreting facts to favor the romanian-style history) are somehow have at least one hungarian-secler relative. complexies in the not so old, ultra-nationalist romania. kind of stockholm syndrome.
@kockasfuzetlapunyul aside of that: if i hate the ultra-nationalist romanian (and in big-romania complexies suffered guys /like you/ who know more about history than most of the romanians, but a larger mouth (to prove how great romanians are you)) bullshit about daco-roman continuity. the idiotic theory of 42 000 BC "proto-romanians" or their false beliefes in the everlasting, oldest country romania that had Transylvania from the beginning, maybe from the beginning of time too.. :-p
@kockasfuzetlapunyul so if i am against these, whats your problem. put your little(?) complexes away for a sec: why exactly is that threatening to you, if i am answering trollmanians, and romanians, even lolmanians idiotic videos and comments, revealing what's behind for example english and french bless for romania (meanwhile they are treating you romanian people not even as shit). and that their country is not so old, its people only use Translyvania as a mid-destination to spain, italy, france
@kockasfuzetlapunyul though they take their time to mock hungarians-seclers (saxons are now about 0,4% in Transylvnia, where they were equal parts of the nobility for 800ys. hungarians-seclers lived there even before Hungaraian Kingdom was formed. and its name was not by mistake Hungarian Kingdom.. our ancestors along with other little nations, who willingly fought for HK to live and die here are well remembered. we and the chronicles do not remeber the vlachs and slovakians this way.
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , uuu please mister don't ruin my dreams! We Hungarians are the most oppresed nation in the world! We are here since Jesus Christ! Those bad Romanians who came from Albania, or Bulgaria, or Macedonia? OK Greece! took over our ancient erdely :( Slovaks also bad people came and stole our land! Also Serbs and some Ukrainians. We like Croatians but it's still part of Hungarian Kingdom! And Szekelys are Hungarians even though we saw them as separate nation until '90s :((
the most oppressed by the time are palestines. then the little nations in china, russian federation. those who are affected by 'world'power claims, afganisthan, iraq, oh and n-korea. and also japan (us influency from WWII still). people of middle-east, and whole africa. south america. inside the EU the newly joined countries.
maybe its only in your dreams that Hungary is the most oppressed. in general. if wee look for the one country
@kockasfuzetlapunyul specifically which was devastated the most, depite what it had made for protecting christian world. that country is Hungarian Kingdom, now Hungarian Republic. which other country's territory (without Croatia - HK was in personal union with Croatia, they had their inner policy, and HK protected them from Venice, which was the most powerful city-state and attacked Croatia for the dalmatian trade-routes; even after trianon, and after communism Hungary was the only country
@kockasfuzetlapunyul which helped Croatia against the asshole serbs. to leave the artificial yugoslavia.. so stfu. you don't know about the connection between HK and Croatian Kingdom. no one in Hungary ever treated Croatia as a not independent countrypart. it was and thank to their will to fight is an independent country. short terms of direct oppression by habsburgs and "slavic friends", serbs+russians made them fight. 800ys personal union with HK - no direct fights, just by habsburgs: NONE.)
slovaks.. did slovakia existed before 1993? NO. did czechslovakia existed before 1920? NO. (not to mention WWII, when czechs mocked the 3m sudeten-germans and were surprised that nazi germany attacked them.. slovakia (later it was not concerned as independent in WWII, cause czechslovakia was legally restored) even attacked Poland!) when was HK founded? year 1000. when rumania? 1882, but before 1920 Transylvania was part of HK.
@kockasfuzetlapunyul so who exactly 'stole' territories from the other? czechslovakia and romanian kingdom did from Hungarian Kingdom! so did: Austria, (after WWII some parts from czechslovakia was passed by soviet order to ukraine), yugoslavia. with significant hungarian population outside the idiotic new borders of Hungarian Kingdom. they were made after WWs and none of the new "neighbours" defeated us in the wars. whatsmore in WWII they were part of the axis powers.. sum this up trollmanian..
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , following your logic Italy never existed before 1861 or Germany before 1871 xD Just because there were fragmented provinces or other types of organized teritories that doesn't mean the people just teleported there :D Same case with Slovaks, Romanians, Serbs etc. In case of Romania they existed in majority in Transylvania, Wallachia, Moldavia. They tried to unify first in 1600 and then with success in 1918. Simple as that. You lolgarian ;;)
@gogoasacenusie as germany it not existed. it not acted like one country. you seriously deny this? LOL!. and why garibaldi and the others went through those serious fights then? these were not one countries, but in a more or less one common frame in germany 300-400! autonome territories. with their own inner policies. Prussia and basburg austria fought for the unificatian Prussia won - Germany was founded without austria.. Italy: several strong city-states fought with each other..
@gogoasacenusie and when exactly counted officially throughout history who became the majority? (and romanians became the "slight"! majority only in Transylvania, not in HK because they were not fighting. no fights-population growth. same goes for slovaks. they existed, slovakia never existed before XXth century. and guess what all slavics in 1920 were 46,7% in the torn apart HK countryparts! (in Pozsony - now bratislava 14% slavics lived!! and not all slavics were slovaks!) again you FAIL.
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , when they became majority? :D Very simple they were since the beggining xD Trollgarian you fight against the very Hungarian historical sources and all history books from planet Earth ;;) Read the conquest of Transylvania in Gesta Hungarorum. Read Kezai, Nestor, Oguzname, etc You know it very well and yet you act so surprised, almost like a clown :P You lil hamster :D
@gogoasacenusie i saw that coming. i said you will definitely say "from the beginning" of time? right, right, right little malchik trollmanian? ;-)
you do know why the goatfuckers were mentioned by romans, and others. you know there is no other proof that you your ancestors fought f.e. with romans, or us than mentioning them in one or two lines in "codexes" in which even witchesm fairies and others are mentioned more. IT WAS SHAME 4 ROMANS THAT THERE WAS NO REAL ENEMY IN THE REGION.
you are projecting and gone insane. way to go dust-in trollmann! :-D
you know you had at least some historical knowledge, not like 99% (such a popular percentage nowadays) the avarege lolmanians, but you are now in absolute troll-mode, and from now on you are going to face starvation. i am not feeding you trollmanian, go away, bad troll, baaaad, go!
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , sorry if i upset you xD those historical chronicles are there and won't be gone but who knows maybe HARRY POTTER will make them go away ;;) you trollgarian :P
@gogoasacenusie with 1600 you refer to the the executed by own "men" "brave" michael. who, when the true hungarian princips were not at home in Transylvania and most of the transylvanian seclers, hungarians left to fight in international wars, this idiot and his company fled to HK, because the time of tax-paying of vlach principality to ottoman empire came to close. he and his "company" claimed that he will be the princip of Transylvania. just the ottoman sultan, the habsburg-hungarian king
@kockasfuzetlapunyul the hungarian princip and his own men not accepted him. .-D you know what trollmanian, claim thait you are the king rumania, i wonder how many people will follow you. (but beware, they want your title, want you life! AHAHAHAHAHHA you little prick.)
the first and the second hungarian made vlach principalities were under suzerainty of: HK, PK, BK, Ottoman empire (willingly tax-payer for 350ys!) you traited every single nation around you and some even far away from you.
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , "attack the Hungarian kingdom" :D The "AUSTRO-Hungarian" kingdom was a medieval artificial creation in which so many populations like Slovaks, Romanians, Serbs, Croatians, etc were majority in their respective lands. Trianon is irrelevant as these populations would have taken back the lands with or without Trianon. Stolen gold? Lol. Romania has in its national gold reserves about 103 tones of gold. One of the biggest in the world :D Nobody exploits the gold except Romania
@gogoasacenusie you are debil. Austria-Hungary was made in 1867! and after WWI it was gone.. the habsburgs had dreams of big empire we hungarians fought for our freedom, cause habsburgs treated even hungarians like austria treated the minorities of HK. we had habsburg king you moron, we gained officially as a country independeny and namely the same rights. but Franz-Joseph ruled. and not surprisingly decided in every questions pro Austria..
@gogoasacenusie HK was the largest gold producer in Europe before 1920. before "founding" "India" - America, and stealing the gold in S-America HK was the known worlds number 1 gold producer. deal with it trollmanian.
(and about stolen gold. even during WWII the germans stole the second gold-train of Hungary, and when they were defeated, the USA stole that.. the jews sued US government for it.. and they got nothing.)
even that was an amount of gold. still nothing compared to our gold-mines.
@kockasfuzetlapunyul and about who mines the gold in Transylvania. yeah romanians do it. with: asutralian and canadian companies. you lolmanians screwed up for english and french (or you don't know about the connection between these countries, i help you out (again): 'ex'-colonies of france and england. with real and nowadays interests in them. 'common'wealth..) when let the soviets in with you traitorous acts. (that is one reason that romania is treated like shit).
@kockasfuzetlapunyul the only connection english and french in reality have with you are the Transylvanian gold-mines. just recently basescu whined that new contracts has to be made in favor for romania, because when the last one was made the price of gold was 1700 dollars/oz in the contract. basescu whined that throughout the long-term contracts it will reach even 2500 (it started skyscraping AFTER the first contratcts were signed.. ;-))
@kockasfuzetlapunyul the soviets had their own mining "problems. so during communist era only silver mines were robbed by soviets. after SU collapsed, romania still had the communist (absent. ceaucescu, who was lightning fast executed, to save the others. romania was and is a shitty poor country. what it could made it rich, the gold was long time ago "spent" by english and french..) they are in such a rush, that they polluted the river Tisza in 2000-2001 with cyanid-mining "tech".
@kockasfuzetlapunyul and now they have the plans to explode the whole mountain to reach the gold! Verespatak. Gabriel Resources - canadian(!) company. AURUL ltd. - romanian and (surprise-surprise) australian company.
so please you little trollmanian (sugar on top) g.f.y. ;-)
its true you moron that some part goes to romania. but at least 2/3rd of the gold wanders to help english and french interest their common wealth. guess what will happen if gold producing will be over.. bye-bye romania..
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , you trollgarian don't even have basic concepts like understanding what the national gold reserve is xD and I have to admit that the gold - teritorial integrity conection is......fascinating :D:D bye bye neurons heloo insanity cuckoo-cuckoo ;;)
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , u.u.u. Monkey angry. Monkey don't understand that monkey was minority in "our" kingdom. Monkey don't understand that gold from Romania goes in Romania national reserves that's why it is 103 tones in present day which is one of the biggest in the world. Monkey also don't understand that gold from Romania stays in Romania. Monkey also don't understand that "OUR" teritory was always the teritory of others and monkey has.....BIG inferiority complexes...u u u
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , yeah you got me. I just like inventing hungarian connections and praising them to kockasfuzetlapunyul from youtube....you trollgarian ;) "Historical facts" from hungarian history books ahhaa....and gray aliens from Zeta Reticuli probing your trollgarian ass ;;)
@gogoasacenusie dont say that zeta reticuli was a great romanian pagan principality (when everyone else had christian kingdom, but hey you are lolmanian, who doeasn't care), right. Hungarian Kingdom founded in year 1000. romanian kingdom without Transylvania because it was the countrypart of HK was founded when exactly: 1881-1882? you are denying this fact along with others? why to play in little, play it big lolmanian.. (and hell you know this.) with your ps-s called in your case mouth.
thats one cause that once again 3 options will be available for you:
-borders mid-WWII
-borders before trianon peace dictate
-borders before 1882 (officially) or a decade before unofficially*
*there was no other country on earth where the kingdom was founded without a king crowned
and i was fair with those 3 options. it has a chance, that russian, bulgarian, hungarian and even other claims are going to reach more than a simple regain of their territories you had stolen with help..
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , actually Romania was one of the richest countries in Europe during monarhy and before communism. I noticed you like to mentally masturbate yourself with the whole "Hungarian kingdom" stuff. You didn't loose any teritories buddy simply because there wasn't yours. Not historically, not from ethnical majority point of view. A country so small as Hungary does not posess any military power either. Stop bitching and look to the future while thanking God you still have a country
@gogoasacenusie you mean monarchy between world wars. with the stolen Erdély. though you did not have the technology to mine the gold. also england, france not allowing you alone even today, right? ;-)
really? just look up the historical maps and find rumanian kingdom. and tell me please about the brave well known battles of yours vlach-rumanian-romanian-trollmanian. beggars.
@gogoasacenusie new country no debts. also not involved in wars (if you don't count that after you attacked Hungarian Kingdom - because french and english guarantee that you can have Transylvania, of not for free, but for a "small" fee: the HK's gold mines in Transylvania - HK before 1920 was Europe largest gold producer, before 1492, the worlds largest! you were seriously defeated /and you attecked after the WWI finished!!).
Autonomia Székelyföldnek Autonomie für Szekelyland Autonomie for Szekelyland Autonomie pentru Szekelyland Autonómia Szekelyland Аутономија за Сзекелыланд Автономність по Szekelyland Özerklik Szekelyland için الحكم الذاتي لل Szekelyland オートノミーの Szekelyland Autonomia për Szekelyland Autonomía para Szekelyland Awtonomija għall Szekelyland Autonomie pour Szekelyland
I love Romania to... The only Eastern country where people look like us the Italians.. oo well I forgot Romanian is a Latin Language :D... Girls are hot in Romania..
but because hungary beats the shit out of their gypsies then these fuckin gypsies come to romania because it's a free country and then they go to italy steal and shit and they make a shame of romania
" Very speciall part of the world" :) A little bit from Prince Charles hart is in Transylvania, Romania. He got a speciall project of reviving some saxon villages from Transylvania ( Viscri village), to encourage the rural tourism and eco-foods. Right this moment he is in Romania for a week.
@Warsongmotan ce mai este foarte frumos din partea englezilor este cat au cotropit si au violat popoare si regiuni intregi de-a lungul timpului ,si probabil ca se pisiceste pe langa romani care ii venereaza pe regi si printi si alte jeguri umane ptr ca sa faca o noua cotropire ,vedeti de exemplu scutul antiracheta din comuna Deveselu al americanilor,
@Warsongmotan un lucru frumos dupa mii de ani de asa zisa civilizatie masacrele se intampla la ordinea zilei,mi se pare cateodata un vis ce traiesc ptr ca lumea nu se ridica la un nivel normal al gandirii si a dragostei planetare ce ne este destinata noua ptr ca asa simtim toti pacea
Why didn't you say something rude and nasty about Camilla?
GingerGilligan 2 weeks ago
@biziclop2 so if Transilvania should belong to Hungary because only 57% were Romanians in the census, then the same in England 80% is occupied by foreigners, based on your logic it should belong 30% to India, 30 to Pakistan, and 10 to Nigeria !!
claireclark69 4 weeks ago
@claireclark69 I'm only saying people are not a herd of goats being traded one day from an owner to another. Whatever is the population, the area and its people, towns, cities have their own history. Borders of Hungary in 1910 were more or less the same than a thousand years ago, that is quite unique in itself already, not to mention the music, the language, 80-90% Hungarian cities, etc. All of a sudden, everything became Romania(n). We could have been best friends but it's fooked up now foevah
biziclop2 3 weeks ago
@biziclop2 you should learn about romanian history , the tracians who lived there were our ancestors. after the war between romans and tracians, 101-102 / 105-106 , our grounds became rome's territory and following their path we became romanians , we ARE the followers of rome !
9DMikke 1 month ago
@9DMikke "the tracians who lived there were our ancestors"
Yes of course, and Traianus, who was the father of all Rumanians, yeah...regardless of his Hispanic origin, not to mention he was a master killer of barbarian Dacians...yes I know a lot about Rumanian history. Always brings me a good laugh when I'm sad.
biziclop2 1 month ago
Note the Masonic handshake.
JillAngie2 1 month ago
@JamesThomson09 "never claim something that was never ours"
Not anymore, I can understand that, after the big deal. It's normal for thieves to keep silent, hoping things would be forgotten forever. And you've been doing pretty good, I give you that, but it's rather our fault. Communists and so-called democrats did not care too much in the last 60 years. But I have bad news, things just began to change.
biziclop2 1 month ago
@biziclop2 If you say so... I just don't care what you think, and I am sure when others will want to take over Romania, we will be waiting here with guns, fight and win like we (almost) always did. Have a pleasant day and bye-bye.
JamesThomson09 1 month ago
@JamesThomson09 You will not have any chance to fight. this would be a simple peace teatment. Just like it was in Trianon. One day you're in Romania, next morning wake up in Hungary. You will all know how it feels.
biziclop2 1 month ago
,,very special part of the world,, God bless you prince Charles
sorinduta1989 2 months ago 11
HM The Queen has excellent health and consequently will probably live longer than her dear mother. After her death (& we sincerely hope that will not be for at least another 15 years) William will be ideally suited to succeed her. Sadly, TAMPAX charles and his pox raddled camilla whore are totally unsuitable and fortunately as there is some doubt regarding the legality of their ‘marriage’ they will eventually fade away or preferably soon be blown up by some third world terrorists!
audreyapardoe 1 week ago
Charles for king...of Romania !!!
it's not a joke, there are many pieces in a puzzle that can come together and make this possible.
And I would love to see this happen, Romania needs this.
chiciu 2 months ago 10
@chiciu no, we dont need prince fkn Charles to come save Romania.Are u kidding me?What about King MIchael, the real king of Romania? U can't run a country just cuz ur grandfathers cousin is somewhat related to you.
MrACIF 1 month ago
he loves the gold-mines of Transylvania, which was torn apart from Hungarian Kingdom. 1915, the 1870's founded rumania asked for HK countrypart Transylvania. the english royal family agreed IF they've could get their hands on Europes No 1, world No 2 gold-mines. France also joined the "agreement".
when romania ratted again in WWII and "joined" SU, GB and France could not get gold from mines (iron curtain etc.). they want the gold badly now.. (Veresbánya, Nagybánya)
kockasfuzetlapunyul 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a tragic embarrassment Charles must be for his parents by cavorting with the despicable Camilla. Various depraved telephone calls are published where Charles states he wants to be whore Camillas TAMPAX as he was too stupid to use a secure line. Then the legality of his ‘marriage’ is questionable as this was not undertaken by Anglican clergy as required under English law for members of the Royal family. The sooner these two wanton parasites are removed from the face of the earth the better!
ultraxda 4 months ago
SALVAREA ROMANIEI -!!!VOT DEBLAM!!!-
ROMENO91 5 months ago
@georgikamakedonu If what you say is true,then at least a quarter of romanian population must be gypsy,meaning that at least six millions gypsies live in Romania! That's not just a absurdity but one of the most stupid thing i ever read!
TheMariuzszs 7 months ago
people take a look in wikipedia 2.5 % of romanian population is gypsie so thats not very much.
33Bulan33 7 months ago
@C12830772 ce nebun(prost) esti... :)) asta e nepotul reginei Maria idiotule, n-are chiar nicio legatura cu ungurii :)) da' tu traiesti in lumea ta
blackcra 9 months ago
Comment removed
YourTrollingTroll 9 months ago
The appearance of the camilla whore is really disgusting. She certainly cannot walk like a lady; her angular gait is more like one might expect from a street prostitute after a ‘heavy’ night. Her obvious dropped stomach and breasts are quite vulgar and repulsive. Apparently latest reports indicate she has ‘coordination issues’ and often ‘babbles nonsense’ to anyone around with a vacant senile composure. Probably the heavy drinking, cigarettes and earlier acquired STD’s have taken their toil.
chancery180 9 months ago
Its rather pitiable that parasite tampax charles finds this toxic vulgar witch camilla appealing. Bizarrely certain men do find coarse uncouth prolific prostitutes such as this sexually gratifying but its particularly deplorable when DUE TO HER HIGHLY PROMISCUOUS PAST EVEN THE FATHER OF CAMILLAS CHILDREN IS QUESTIONABLE. Only a few years ago the police commissioner stated he could not protect charles if the crowd turned nasty & dear old ladies actually threw bread rolls at the vile whore camilla
ultraxda 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The assets of the Duchy of Cornwall should be sequestrated. There is a legal requirement that beneficiaries must only be direct blood relatives of George 3rd and there is considerable doubt regarding Queen Victoria’s dubious parentage. Clear DNA evidence should be demanded and if not proven the entire assets should be repaid to the nation. As that would render idiot inbred charles insolvent it will be interesting to see how long the whore camilla and charles sycophants remain around after that!
1807H 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Its particularly sad that we have these PARASITES around FIRSTLY WE HAVE CHARLES WHOS CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED HE HAS MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AND HOW TOTALLY UNSUITABLE HE WOULD BE TO SUCCEED HIS MOTHER. Then worst of all we have a vile ugly repulsive Syphilis/STD raddled old whore camilla freeloading on the country serving no useful purpose. This pair both need to be completely eradicated before they totally destroy the monarchy. Clearly only William as Princess Diana’s son is suitable to continue.
clarissapar 10 months ago
CAMILLA LOOKS VILE AND WRETCHED, DRESSING HER IN GOOD CLOTHES IS LIKE GARNISHING A FESTERING TURD. CAMILLA IS RADDLED WITH TOO MUCH DRINK, FORMER SEXUAL DISEASES AND CIGARETTES. SHE NOW OFTEN BABBLES NONSENCE WHEN MEETING PEOPLE TO SUCH AN EXTENT SOME THINK SHE IS GOING SENILE. I HAVE NO DOUBT CAMILLA MAY APPEAR “FRIENDLY” I UNDERSTAND MOST OLD WHORES AND OLD DOGS ARE.
This pair both need to be completely eradicated before they totally destroy the monarchy.
audreysspardoe 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is the story of a pathetic weak man, who enjoyed an experienced womans bedroom skills and this vile poisonous woman had the ability to manipulate the weak man. Charles also obviously didn't think camilla as wifely material in the seventies. IF he did he wouldn't have used her like a common prostitute at Broadlands that Uncle Mountbatten graciously supplied for them for trysts. Charles apparently listened to and agreed with Mountbatten's assessment of Camilla as only prostitute material
audreysspardoe 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@normalil
The only STD RADDLED FILTH here is you and that disgusting POX infested camilla whore parasite you keep supporting! You know it will not be long before some third world terrorist of or similar ‘sanitises’ the creature and blows it away just like uncle dickie! Furthermore, every time you write filth from your vile little Manchester slum regarding Princess Diana I will respond and advertise TENFOLD about either you, the vile camilla wore and your various double incontinence issues!
gxocgxoc 11 months ago
A Gentalman ;)
nicktk 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Its particularly sad that we have these PARASITES around. FIRSTLY WE HAVE CHARLES WHOS CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED HE HAS MENTAL HEALTH PROBLEMS AND HOW TOTALLY UNSUITABLE HE WOULD BE TO SUCCEED HIS MOTHER. Then worst of all we have a vile ugly repulsive Syphilis/STD raddled old whore camilla freeloading on the country serving no useful purpose. This pair both need to be completely eradicated before they totally destroy the monarchy. Clearly only William as Princess Diana’s son is suitable to continue.
gxocgxoc 1 year ago
Comment removed
ebberlyx 1 year ago
Romania only got 500.000 gipsys moore or less..not 2 milions
0Spectre 1 year ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
Members of the Royal family are excepted from the provisions of the Marriage Act 1949, and their marriages in England and Wales MUST be performed by Anglican clergy. There would, however, be no obstacle to The Prince of Wales re-marrying in Scotland (as did his sister The Princess Royal) where the Royal Family are not excepted from the provisions of the Scottish Marriage legislation. CHARLES MARRIAGE IS ILLEGAL BECAUSE HE REMARRIED IN ENGLAND AND HE WAS AWARE OF IT WHEN HE MARRIED WHORE CAMILLA
clarissapar 1 year ago
the country with the most gipsys from europe in numbers are the hungayrians with 7 million gipsys official romania has 2 millions so europe has 12 millions gypsys who got 600 years ago as slaves and now they want us to take care of all europe what a shame!!! We did the best for gipsys, jews, tatars or slavic people, so who is the moral country in the world? Romania is:
MrHOTSOUL 2 years ago 13
@MrHOTSOUL you're kind of retarded. romania doesn't have 2 million gypsies .
SquareGameplay 1 year ago
you fuck heads saying Romanians are gypsies. alright, for example, listen out: so why did HITLER choose to take Romania as a full ALLY and fight together against bolshevism, and not wipe it out and take it over entirely - as he did with all Slavic nations around Romania??? Romanian army was crap, but still... eh? I'm not defending Hitler (he was a psycho - but why would Hitler -- HITLER, the ultimate RASIST and gypsy exterminator , would take a 'Gypsy' nation as allies?? haha!! u fuck heads!
Dannoo007 2 years ago 26
Iroically the huns used that alliance with uncle Adi to claim back the North, partially they even got it( I think Arad that was) You'd better watch yur rear now boy.That nice neighbour of yours says he's claiming half yur country 'back'. And those who do will be elected nxt year, did you know that.? Course they won't call it annexation...rural self gouvernment sounds much better. That does EU for you.
shooterbob65 2 years ago
@shooterbob65 "That does EU for you" - that's why Romanians should SPIT on the EU.EU is just another artificial "superpower" (like the Soviet Union/Russian Fed, the US, the Commonwealth) created to protect the interests of a few extremely rich people who can manipulate millions of people through the globalization of laissez-faire capitalist economy, inter-ethnic wars & protection of terrorists, financial meltdowns (bailouts), illegal wars and invasions in foreign countries, plots of assasination
aquario008 1 year ago 2
@Dannoo007 man,chill,all that faggots out there who are sayin' romanians are gypsies dont mean it...they just dont have anything else to say bad about us,so they say shits in order to look better...so,everytime an italian,hunGAYrian or albanian cocksucker says to me that i`m a gypsie,that`s the ultimate sign of impotence from them...fuck all romanian haters.
TheStiffmeister14 1 year ago
@TheStiffmeister14 Yeah, I fucking hate it when people call us gypsies. Romanians = Dacian/Roman
Gypsies = Indian trash. We are not gypsies, fuck you american dummies.
skatermichael22 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ROMANii Nu au invadat/ocupat sau furat de la nimeni. Turcii, Rusii, Germanii, Austro-Ungarii (+ chiar Englezii) au furat de la noi. Noi am eliberat alte popoare. Imperiul BRITanic a furat din: Europa, Asia, Africa, etc nu au muncit niciodata. Acum UK este DECAZUT(a) nu ca noi din saracie dar de trait bine, furat prea mult. ENGLEZoaicele albe si barbatii lor sunt cei mai: PERVERSi, PEDOfili, drogati, inculti, alcoolici, lenesi. In anglia au cele mai multe cazuri deSIDA, boli VENERICE, divort...
KGBfbiSECUpolitia 2 years ago
I'm from Romania but i still love America.
Spectraaal 2 years ago
Calling romanians gypsies is like calling americans niggers. 10% of americans are black. 8-10% of people in romania are gypsies. Only the uneducated would say that romanians are a nation of gypsies. Oh, by the way , taliking about gypsies; England is FULL of pakis and indians and blacs, France is the same, full of algerians and morrocons. If you wanna cal some country "Gypsyland" just say: ENGAND!
sharkloaner 2 years ago 16
@sharkloaner I totally agree to you and stop being racist people!!!!!!
Allexxx96Reloaded 1 year ago
@sharkloaner Romania has 2% gypsies,not 8-10%. And i would rather call Italy or France gypsieland than England.
TheStiffmeister14 9 months ago 2
@TheStiffmeister14 heh , Romania has 15-20 % gypsies ... or even more , believe me .
georgikamakedonu 8 months ago
@georgikamakedonu Yeah and that's true because YOU KNOW BETTER THAN THE PEOPLE WHO MAKE THE STATISTICS LOL .
TheStiffmeister14 8 months ago
@TheStiffmeister14 Gypsies should be departed in India , where they belong from , and if this will happen , u shall see that Romania would rise in every way : social , economic , etc ... - of course , must get rid of the corrupted parliment assholes .
georgikamakedonu 8 months ago
wrong mate.
lopataro 8 months ago
@georgikamakedonu try wikipedia mate
lopataro 8 months ago
@lopataro dude , i live in Romania and in some regions of the country ... the gypsies are a majority ... Ask anyone else . In the city of Constanta (as an example) , about 60% or less are Romanians . There are a lot of gypsies and other ethnic cultures .
georgikamakedonu 8 months ago
@georgikamakedonu There is no region in Romania with Gypsy majority.Gypsies have some streets or sometimes an entire neighborhood in a city or village but that's all.Go in any city center you like and you will see some 100 Romanians and a group of 4-5 Gypsy.That's the real percentage of Gypsies maximum 5 %.Maybe you are obssesed with Gipsies and noticed them imediately but you forgot to count the Romanians around.Or you're just interested in spreading lies about Romania.
MrCraiessou 8 months ago
@MrCraiessou oh , dude , i am telling you , those statistics are not right , and the "100 romanians and 4-5 gypsy" ain't right , its like 100 Ro and 20-25 gypsi , that is how it is in Constanta (at least) . But I won't argue with you anymore , everyone got his opinion , free worlds wtf !
Hai sa traiesti romane .
Sanji banedz lai mucanu .
georgikamakedonu 8 months ago
@georgikamakedonu i used to live in Constanta,I go in Constanta every year,and I know well all Dobrogea country side.The Gypsies are very noticeable by their colour,clothes,sometimes behaviour,they are very 'sparkling' that's why you believe you see them evrywhere but make yourself a favour,go to an average boulevard and look at the people... you will see an ocean of Romanians and just a group or two of few Gypsies. F.ex.the NGO's counted this year Gypsies in Oltenia and they are 5% of oltenians
MrCraiessou 8 months ago
@MrCraiessou pai per total , nu doar o regiune ... Vei vedea ca sunt mai multi decat spune statistica .
georgikamakedonu 8 months ago
@MrCraiessou "There is no region in Romania with Gypsy majority."
just see the "beautiful" bucharest. + aids (hiv+), roving wild dogs, and street-kids capitol.
by the way where the ottoman empire ruled for more than 300ys its sadly natural that there are many uncivilized gipsies. most of them are thieves, criminals as their ancestors had been too, centuries before.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 3 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul No way ,Hungarian kid,that.s what you want to see from beautiful Bucharest,that.s what your stupid propaganda wants to show from our capital city,Don.t worry,boy,I saw lots of Gypsies and beggers in Budapest.,in every capital city there are beggers plus the West has lots of drug-addicted,filthy prostitutes,paria afro-asian immigrants with huge social problems - just look at yourselfs and leave Bucharest alone.Not to mention that you are the reservoir of HIV,more than Africa
MrCraiessou 3 months ago
@MrCraiessou the only kid here is probably you. bucharest is still a large town. there are only soc-real buildings, few megalomaniac ceaucescu-era style official buildings, and plazas. that's not much. most of the gipsies who beg and commit other crimes are from "old"-romania (though romania is relatively new, compared to Hungary, and most of the european countries). deal with it.
and google about the rest: hiv bucharest; street-kids bucharest; romanian beggars
kockasfuzetlapunyul 3 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul And what is Budapest?a small town with some megalomaniac habsburgic bulidings IN DECAY,a copy-paste palace after London Parliament palace,lots of drunkards,lots of whores exposing their vaginas in pictures everywhere,lots of ugly Gypsies beaten by lots of ugly Hungarian skin-heads caricatures.And beside that? Cornfield,pusta,hungarian gypsies and peasants.I don.t need to google your filthy propaganda to find out things about my beautiful country Romania
MrCraiessou 3 months ago
@MrCraiessou before habsburg "house", many other kings were throwned in Hungary. cause its an old country. as a christian kingdom it existed from 1000 to 1946. so we have historical buildings. its natural that most of the buildings remained from the dualist era. but its certainly not like the soc-real style + ceaucescu's few megalomaniac trash buildings in romania. don't forget that except soc-real "residential" areas everything in Transylvania is hungarian, german built.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 3 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul even in unrenovated state those look better than bucharest..
what i've told you is true. and you seriously think that if people search on google HIV bucharest, or street-kids bucharest the found links are hungarian propaganda? are you that stupid really? bucharest is not a beautiful city. it can be in the future. but now it is not. i think even some of the people living there could openly admit this is fact.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 3 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul Like I care about your piles of ugliness!too bad you cannnot move them in your pusta,that we'll teach you a lesson about the evilness of building your ugly houses and churches in stolen land,in Romanian land of Transylvania.I don't care if Hungary is old or new,just stay in your country and leave Romania alone!Bye bye,go trolling hungarian videos,Magyar silly boy.
MrCraiessou 3 months ago
@MrCraiessou "stolen land,in Romanian land of Transylvania" at leats a romanian who is aware of the fact that Transylvania was is stolen land.
"I don't care if Hungary is old or new,just stay in your country and leave Romania alone!"
we did not care about vlach gipsies and what happened.. still i don't care, stay in your country. with the borders of 1882, its official foundation.
uneducated trollmanian.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 3 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , you must be so envious. You basically have nothing in Hungary outside porn industry. The only thing at which Hungary is ahead of Romania is about 100E for the minimum salary. In rest nothing bro, even the palace of Parliament is copied after the one from Britain :D Say hello to the Madjari people from Kazakhstan my dear lolgarian ;)
gogoasacenusie 3 months ago
@gogoasacenusie yeah the situation in Hungary is better than in Romania after Hungarian Kingdom (Hungary) 2/3 of its territories, 1/3rd of its ethnic hungarian population, even the remnant cities, goods were destructed in the world wars twice at about 80-90%s, the gold reserves had been stolen by germans, than from them by USA in WWII. after that 1956 happened. and so on.
meanwhile romania joined in wars you have never won (pretending as you've not been defeated and even signed the peace
kockasfuzetlapunyul 3 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul treaty.. you've got Erdély/Transylvania from french and english who got gold mines of Transylvania in exchange.
so everywhere, everytime (not all the time, romanian kingdom was only formed in 1882 and Transylvania was HK countrypart not romanian) despite you had been not fighted or even seriously defeated, you gained unbelievable wealth as a country. still you are no better than Hungary (HK 1000-1946). which was robbed several times. you are pathetic.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 3 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , by the way, i noticed you have some kind of sick desperation in your posts. It's probably triggered by inferiority complexes. The funniest part of all is the "3 options available for you" i have to admit, it just cracked me up when i have read them. I remember you buddy, i know i've talked to you before. By the way, you should search the "Wild Carpathia" trailer where Prince Charles says he's descendent of Vlad the Impaler. The full movie will be out on the market soon.
gogoasacenusie 3 months ago
@gogoasacenusie indeed triggered by inferiority complexes. complexes of mostly chauvinist, great romanian, slavic nationalists. because most of them are aware that historical facts are not really equal to their nationalist propaganda.
the funniest part that those are based on the following facts. 1. before 1867, romanian kingdom not existed. 2. before 1920.6.04. Transylvania was not the part of rumania 3. during WWII HK gained back northern parts of Transylvania, with hungarian majority.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 3 months ago
@gogoasacenusie yeah. and william is northern irish. the queen is indian whatsmore among english royal family the are australians (even aboriginals). you really don't realise why that prince charles is telling those things. why all the royal family members are visiting their "interests". they mostly don't give a shit about people. hello, they are elites. not workers. though sometimes they have to work. visiting, saying things to keep the money, keep the wealth. the "common wealth".
kockasfuzetlapunyul 3 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , don't be envious my little madjari lolgarian friend ;;) Buddy, seriosly now. Who on this planet would believe that Transylvania was inhabited since the beggining by Hungarians when in your own hungarian oldest chronicle is written it was inhabited by Romanians :D And the chronicle even has archeological correspondence? And there are about a dozen other chronicles saying the same things? Cmon buddy, we've talked again, it is futile to debate against a fact... :P
gogoasacenusie 3 months ago
@gogoasacenusie @gogoasacenusie i wonder why you didn't save the funny term lolgarian (derived from mine usage for you lolmanians /not all romanians, not all in romania believes that romania is the oldest country on earth.. founded by proto-romanians (42 000 BC) and roman descendants.. ROFLMANIA ;-) ) for bulgarians.
and who said that transylvania was not habited? :-o the only thing i've ever said (based on facts) that your descendants (you claim to be romans LOL, if that might be true, then
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul albanians (who romanian nationalist tend to at least "not like" refusing to admit their REAL conneczion with romans) are mega-brutal-über-romans. you were their neighbours in moesia. only lolmanian problem with this fact, that moesia was not in the carpatian basin, where transylvania is. :-D).
we hungarians founded HK, which had as countrypart transylvania. the first vlachs appeared there in 13th century, asked our king to travel through(!) HK to the later on moldavia.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul the territory which later became moldavia was inhabited in 800s by hungarians, cumans (with hungarian help cumans made up a pagan kingdom) - the cuman kingdom was forceful till the mongol invasion of europe. after that it declined and in 1356 the hungarian(!) king ordered the restoration of a country next to HK's n-eastern borders. that time half of the leaders was cumans (with strong hungarian relations, some even ethnic hungarians, they've slowly left moldavia principality
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul and moved to Transylvania - those who had right to bring with them their peasents, workers were the so called "kenéz", who himself had to be not vlach (cause the peasents in cuman kingdom were those vlachs and their descendants who asked permission to cross HK from the once moesia), but hungarian-cuman. /thats the cause why the Hunyadis were clearly not vlachs. John Hunyadi's father was kenéz (you romanians derived this title as "cneaz"). only the kenéz had the right to
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul let vlachs settle down in HK. otherwise it was prohibited. (being pagans, not fighters, but workers).
the remnant leaders of cuman kingdom were vlachs, vlachs like most of the peasents in cumanian kingdom for 100ys. and slowly vlachs became the majority of peasantry in transylvania from 14th century till 19th. though hungarian-secler and saxon (german) nobility never allowed in fights not involved, hundred years later settled vlachs to gain nobility.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , "Hungarians are before Romanians/Vlachs in Transylvania"
Even writing it it's a logical fallacy lol. I don't like albanians btw ( because they're muslims...). I like Bulgarians, Serbians and even Hungarians. As hard as it may be to believe, i have szekely relatives ( my grandma ). And i know a bit hungarian....The problem is, i have 0 tolerance for bullshit and morons. The trollus idiotus has no ethnicity, no color and no religion. But i do enjoy talking to them lol
gogoasacenusie 2 months ago
@gogoasacenusie and you are citating that sentence from who exactly? and also why? your way of interpreting was rather a phallosy..
that's interesting about your connections. i've only found on internet (yt) true trollmanians who don't know a single historical fact. those who know (but misinterpreting facts to favor the romanian-style history) are somehow have at least one hungarian-secler relative. complexies in the not so old, ultra-nationalist romania. kind of stockholm syndrome.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul aside of that: if i hate the ultra-nationalist romanian (and in big-romania complexies suffered guys /like you/ who know more about history than most of the romanians, but a larger mouth (to prove how great romanians are you)) bullshit about daco-roman continuity. the idiotic theory of 42 000 BC "proto-romanians" or their false beliefes in the everlasting, oldest country romania that had Transylvania from the beginning, maybe from the beginning of time too.. :-p
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul so if i am against these, whats your problem. put your little(?) complexes away for a sec: why exactly is that threatening to you, if i am answering trollmanians, and romanians, even lolmanians idiotic videos and comments, revealing what's behind for example english and french bless for romania (meanwhile they are treating you romanian people not even as shit). and that their country is not so old, its people only use Translyvania as a mid-destination to spain, italy, france
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul though they take their time to mock hungarians-seclers (saxons are now about 0,4% in Transylvnia, where they were equal parts of the nobility for 800ys. hungarians-seclers lived there even before Hungaraian Kingdom was formed. and its name was not by mistake Hungarian Kingdom.. our ancestors along with other little nations, who willingly fought for HK to live and die here are well remembered. we and the chronicles do not remeber the vlachs and slovakians this way.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , uuu please mister don't ruin my dreams! We Hungarians are the most oppresed nation in the world! We are here since Jesus Christ! Those bad Romanians who came from Albania, or Bulgaria, or Macedonia? OK Greece! took over our ancient erdely :( Slovaks also bad people came and stole our land! Also Serbs and some Ukrainians. We like Croatians but it's still part of Hungarian Kingdom! And Szekelys are Hungarians even though we saw them as separate nation until '90s :((
gogoasacenusie 2 months ago
@gogoasacenusie well thats your dreams. yours.
the most oppressed by the time are palestines. then the little nations in china, russian federation. those who are affected by 'world'power claims, afganisthan, iraq, oh and n-korea. and also japan (us influency from WWII still). people of middle-east, and whole africa. south america. inside the EU the newly joined countries.
maybe its only in your dreams that Hungary is the most oppressed. in general. if wee look for the one country
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul specifically which was devastated the most, depite what it had made for protecting christian world. that country is Hungarian Kingdom, now Hungarian Republic. which other country's territory (without Croatia - HK was in personal union with Croatia, they had their inner policy, and HK protected them from Venice, which was the most powerful city-state and attacked Croatia for the dalmatian trade-routes; even after trianon, and after communism Hungary was the only country
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul which helped Croatia against the asshole serbs. to leave the artificial yugoslavia.. so stfu. you don't know about the connection between HK and Croatian Kingdom. no one in Hungary ever treated Croatia as a not independent countrypart. it was and thank to their will to fight is an independent country. short terms of direct oppression by habsburgs and "slavic friends", serbs+russians made them fight. 800ys personal union with HK - no direct fights, just by habsburgs: NONE.)
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
slovaks.. did slovakia existed before 1993? NO. did czechslovakia existed before 1920? NO. (not to mention WWII, when czechs mocked the 3m sudeten-germans and were surprised that nazi germany attacked them.. slovakia (later it was not concerned as independent in WWII, cause czechslovakia was legally restored) even attacked Poland!) when was HK founded? year 1000. when rumania? 1882, but before 1920 Transylvania was part of HK.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul so who exactly 'stole' territories from the other? czechslovakia and romanian kingdom did from Hungarian Kingdom! so did: Austria, (after WWII some parts from czechslovakia was passed by soviet order to ukraine), yugoslavia. with significant hungarian population outside the idiotic new borders of Hungarian Kingdom. they were made after WWs and none of the new "neighbours" defeated us in the wars. whatsmore in WWII they were part of the axis powers.. sum this up trollmanian..
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , following your logic Italy never existed before 1861 or Germany before 1871 xD Just because there were fragmented provinces or other types of organized teritories that doesn't mean the people just teleported there :D Same case with Slovaks, Romanians, Serbs etc. In case of Romania they existed in majority in Transylvania, Wallachia, Moldavia. They tried to unify first in 1600 and then with success in 1918. Simple as that. You lolgarian ;;)
gogoasacenusie 2 months ago
@gogoasacenusie as germany it not existed. it not acted like one country. you seriously deny this? LOL!. and why garibaldi and the others went through those serious fights then? these were not one countries, but in a more or less one common frame in germany 300-400! autonome territories. with their own inner policies. Prussia and basburg austria fought for the unificatian Prussia won - Germany was founded without austria.. Italy: several strong city-states fought with each other..
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@gogoasacenusie and when exactly counted officially throughout history who became the majority? (and romanians became the "slight"! majority only in Transylvania, not in HK because they were not fighting. no fights-population growth. same goes for slovaks. they existed, slovakia never existed before XXth century. and guess what all slavics in 1920 were 46,7% in the torn apart HK countryparts! (in Pozsony - now bratislava 14% slavics lived!! and not all slavics were slovaks!) again you FAIL.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , when they became majority? :D Very simple they were since the beggining xD Trollgarian you fight against the very Hungarian historical sources and all history books from planet Earth ;;) Read the conquest of Transylvania in Gesta Hungarorum. Read Kezai, Nestor, Oguzname, etc You know it very well and yet you act so surprised, almost like a clown :P You lil hamster :D
gogoasacenusie 2 months ago
@gogoasacenusie i saw that coming. i said you will definitely say "from the beginning" of time? right, right, right little malchik trollmanian? ;-)
you do know why the goatfuckers were mentioned by romans, and others. you know there is no other proof that you your ancestors fought f.e. with romans, or us than mentioning them in one or two lines in "codexes" in which even witchesm fairies and others are mentioned more. IT WAS SHAME 4 ROMANS THAT THERE WAS NO REAL ENEMY IN THE REGION.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
you are projecting and gone insane. way to go dust-in trollmann! :-D
you know you had at least some historical knowledge, not like 99% (such a popular percentage nowadays) the avarege lolmanians, but you are now in absolute troll-mode, and from now on you are going to face starvation. i am not feeding you trollmanian, go away, bad troll, baaaad, go!
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , sorry if i upset you xD those historical chronicles are there and won't be gone but who knows maybe HARRY POTTER will make them go away ;;) you trollgarian :P
gogoasacenusie 2 months ago
@gogoasacenusie with 1600 you refer to the the executed by own "men" "brave" michael. who, when the true hungarian princips were not at home in Transylvania and most of the transylvanian seclers, hungarians left to fight in international wars, this idiot and his company fled to HK, because the time of tax-paying of vlach principality to ottoman empire came to close. he and his "company" claimed that he will be the princip of Transylvania. just the ottoman sultan, the habsburg-hungarian king
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul the hungarian princip and his own men not accepted him. .-D you know what trollmanian, claim thait you are the king rumania, i wonder how many people will follow you. (but beware, they want your title, want you life! AHAHAHAHAHHA you little prick.)
the first and the second hungarian made vlach principalities were under suzerainty of: HK, PK, BK, Ottoman empire (willingly tax-payer for 350ys!) you traited every single nation around you and some even far away from you.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , "attack the Hungarian kingdom" :D The "AUSTRO-Hungarian" kingdom was a medieval artificial creation in which so many populations like Slovaks, Romanians, Serbs, Croatians, etc were majority in their respective lands. Trianon is irrelevant as these populations would have taken back the lands with or without Trianon. Stolen gold? Lol. Romania has in its national gold reserves about 103 tones of gold. One of the biggest in the world :D Nobody exploits the gold except Romania
gogoasacenusie 2 months ago
@gogoasacenusie you are debil. Austria-Hungary was made in 1867! and after WWI it was gone.. the habsburgs had dreams of big empire we hungarians fought for our freedom, cause habsburgs treated even hungarians like austria treated the minorities of HK. we had habsburg king you moron, we gained officially as a country independeny and namely the same rights. but Franz-Joseph ruled. and not surprisingly decided in every questions pro Austria..
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@gogoasacenusie HK was the largest gold producer in Europe before 1920. before "founding" "India" - America, and stealing the gold in S-America HK was the known worlds number 1 gold producer. deal with it trollmanian.
(and about stolen gold. even during WWII the germans stole the second gold-train of Hungary, and when they were defeated, the USA stole that.. the jews sued US government for it.. and they got nothing.)
even that was an amount of gold. still nothing compared to our gold-mines.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul and about who mines the gold in Transylvania. yeah romanians do it. with: asutralian and canadian companies. you lolmanians screwed up for english and french (or you don't know about the connection between these countries, i help you out (again): 'ex'-colonies of france and england. with real and nowadays interests in them. 'common'wealth..) when let the soviets in with you traitorous acts. (that is one reason that romania is treated like shit).
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul the only connection english and french in reality have with you are the Transylvanian gold-mines. just recently basescu whined that new contracts has to be made in favor for romania, because when the last one was made the price of gold was 1700 dollars/oz in the contract. basescu whined that throughout the long-term contracts it will reach even 2500 (it started skyscraping AFTER the first contratcts were signed.. ;-))
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul the soviets had their own mining "problems. so during communist era only silver mines were robbed by soviets. after SU collapsed, romania still had the communist (absent. ceaucescu, who was lightning fast executed, to save the others. romania was and is a shitty poor country. what it could made it rich, the gold was long time ago "spent" by english and french..) they are in such a rush, that they polluted the river Tisza in 2000-2001 with cyanid-mining "tech".
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul and now they have the plans to explode the whole mountain to reach the gold! Verespatak. Gabriel Resources - canadian(!) company. AURUL ltd. - romanian and (surprise-surprise) australian company.
so please you little trollmanian (sugar on top) g.f.y. ;-)
its true you moron that some part goes to romania. but at least 2/3rd of the gold wanders to help english and french interest their common wealth. guess what will happen if gold producing will be over.. bye-bye romania..
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , you trollgarian don't even have basic concepts like understanding what the national gold reserve is xD and I have to admit that the gold - teritorial integrity conection is......fascinating :D:D bye bye neurons heloo insanity cuckoo-cuckoo ;;)
gogoasacenusie 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , u.u.u. Monkey angry. Monkey don't understand that monkey was minority in "our" kingdom. Monkey don't understand that gold from Romania goes in Romania national reserves that's why it is 103 tones in present day which is one of the biggest in the world. Monkey also don't understand that gold from Romania stays in Romania. Monkey also don't understand that "OUR" teritory was always the teritory of others and monkey has.....BIG inferiority complexes...u u u
gogoasacenusie 2 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , yeah you got me. I just like inventing hungarian connections and praising them to kockasfuzetlapunyul from youtube....you trollgarian ;) "Historical facts" from hungarian history books ahhaa....and gray aliens from Zeta Reticuli probing your trollgarian ass ;;)
gogoasacenusie 2 months ago
@gogoasacenusie dont say that zeta reticuli was a great romanian pagan principality (when everyone else had christian kingdom, but hey you are lolmanian, who doeasn't care), right. Hungarian Kingdom founded in year 1000. romanian kingdom without Transylvania because it was the countrypart of HK was founded when exactly: 1881-1882? you are denying this fact along with others? why to play in little, play it big lolmanian.. (and hell you know this.) with your ps-s called in your case mouth.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
thats one cause that once again 3 options will be available for you:
-borders mid-WWII
-borders before trianon peace dictate
-borders before 1882 (officially) or a decade before unofficially*
*there was no other country on earth where the kingdom was founded without a king crowned
and i was fair with those 3 options. it has a chance, that russian, bulgarian, hungarian and even other claims are going to reach more than a simple regain of their territories you had stolen with help..
kockasfuzetlapunyul 3 months ago
@kockasfuzetlapunyul , actually Romania was one of the richest countries in Europe during monarhy and before communism. I noticed you like to mentally masturbate yourself with the whole "Hungarian kingdom" stuff. You didn't loose any teritories buddy simply because there wasn't yours. Not historically, not from ethnical majority point of view. A country so small as Hungary does not posess any military power either. Stop bitching and look to the future while thanking God you still have a country
gogoasacenusie 3 months ago
@gogoasacenusie you mean monarchy between world wars. with the stolen Erdély. though you did not have the technology to mine the gold. also england, france not allowing you alone even today, right? ;-)
really? just look up the historical maps and find rumanian kingdom. and tell me please about the brave well known battles of yours vlach-rumanian-romanian-trollmanian. beggars.
kockasfuzetlapunyul 3 months ago
@gogoasacenusie new country no debts. also not involved in wars (if you don't count that after you attacked Hungarian Kingdom - because french and english guarantee that you can have Transylvania, of not for free, but for a "small" fee: the HK's gold mines in Transylvania - HK before 1920 was Europe largest gold producer, before 1492, the worlds largest! you were seriously defeated /and you attecked after the WWI finished!!).
kockasfuzetlapunyul 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
brainiacmaster 2 years ago
do you have a 'switch off' button??
Dannoo007 2 years ago
GOD BLESS ROMANIA
gcgrup 3 years ago 23
I love Romania to... The only Eastern country where people look like us the Italians.. oo well I forgot Romanian is a Latin Language :D... Girls are hot in Romania..
DorianGabriello 3 years ago 71
but because hungary beats the shit out of their gypsies then these fuckin gypsies come to romania because it's a free country and then they go to italy steal and shit and they make a shame of romania
chickensupdude 2 years ago 10
@DorianGabriello romanians look like italians?! Where do you get that from?! If it's true it's trough romans..
ZamolxisGebeleizis 1 year ago
@DorianGabriello Moldova too ... we look like Italians too xD
MrVladunea 10 months ago
@DorianGabriello Thank you so much!!!
skatermichael22 9 months ago
Câteva cuvinte, care înseamnă foarte mult pentru noi, românii. Să-i dea Dumnezeu sănătate.
Vlahia2008 3 years ago 23
si sA LE DEA GENOCID LA TIGANI
chickensupdude 2 years ago
" Very speciall part of the world" :) A little bit from Prince Charles hart is in Transylvania, Romania. He got a speciall project of reviving some saxon villages from Transylvania ( Viscri village), to encourage the rural tourism and eco-foods. Right this moment he is in Romania for a week.
AndreiM999 3 years ago 26
foarte frumos din partea lui!
Warsongmotan 3 years ago 45
@Warsongmotan ce mai este foarte frumos din partea englezilor este cat au cotropit si au violat popoare si regiuni intregi de-a lungul timpului ,si probabil ca se pisiceste pe langa romani care ii venereaza pe regi si printi si alte jeguri umane ptr ca sa faca o noua cotropire ,vedeti de exemplu scutul antiracheta din comuna Deveselu al americanilor,
veganbo 3 months ago
@Warsongmotan un lucru frumos dupa mii de ani de asa zisa civilizatie masacrele se intampla la ordinea zilei,mi se pare cateodata un vis ce traiesc ptr ca lumea nu se ridica la un nivel normal al gandirii si a dragostei planetare ce ne este destinata noua ptr ca asa simtim toti pacea
veganbo 3 months ago