what the f**k is next, thats rediculous . . 2010 america develops brain wave crowd dispersing weapon, that f**ks with your mind making you run away in fear . . not the future i want to see
gay and gay... 1st/ why the hell we need a shotgun onto the m4 not like we are going to use it every door we kick it and it is bulky..
2/ m203 i rather stick with the old school m203. that thing is bulky plus adding more extra pouch on ur service rifle.. A++ for the Saw other than that suck balls We need new body armor design !!!
I can't figure out how the US can keep affording new weapons when she is almost bankrupt. She is fighting old AK-47's with new rifles costing thousands of dollars. It's like a mad spending spree using unlimited credit card. Thing is the Total US govt debt is like 90% of GDP already and the recession is still ongoing with 10% unemployed. Kinda scary to see how long democracy can be sustained by this kind of free spending.
green peace has called the active denial system "inhumane". I think its more humane to make someone feel like they are burning than to shoot and kill them
by spending 600 BILLION A YEAR. no wonder why we are in a recession. if you added up all the military spending in the world from every single country and made it into a pie chart, the U.S. would take up about half the damn chart. thats how much we waste. oh well at least when we have a real war then we will be showing off the never before seen technology and it will be awesome to see all the new gadgets and planes that are top secret right now.
ADS = lame. In it's current form. Only truly practical area of use is at roadblocks in rural areas. In a city it's mostly useless as you have to close within small arms range to use it at which point baddies can just lite it up, so then to avoid that circumstance, you have to waste time, effort, and manpower to secure it's flanks to prevent it from being neutralized which in turn slows it's deployment time which in turn reduces it's effectivess and practicality.
It is said that the technology given to and in view of the public can be from 25+ years behind our Actual potential. So, for years conspiracy theorists have speculated that our emotions can be manipulated from frequencies sent from satellites and other machinery from space. If this theory is correct, the Active Denial System is just a little snippet of our actual technological ability. That's quite scary. Imagine what they can do from space. Just a thought
I like how they show army personel using this to disperse a crowd. The first time it was fielded, it was used against peaceful civilian protesters at the Pittsburg G20 summit.
No its not. I can wrap myself in metals to deflect the microwaves. Furthermore, I can build the same dang thing in my home, and shoot them with it, too.
@henik9 True. There's a reason they don't want to end the war. Without it they'd have no reason to stop inventing ways to handle dissenters...uh I'm mean insurgents.
This gear is amazing but I`d pass on wearing and carrying it all in a sticky hot Jungle environment or in the middle of a sweltering desert. Gonna be soaked in sweat and exhausted.
THOSE are the weapons of war our soldiers need right now.
Give the XM-320 to the police, and that modular accesory shotgun looks way to bulky. Just take an semi-auto shotgun, and saw off the stock, put a rail on it and attach it.
remote turrets thats amazing.... Someone finally got smart and attached a camara to a turret rather then putting a guy on a 50 cal... and it cheap... now they just gotta put armor on humvees and they got a real good fire support unit... Rpg or nothing.
What do you guys think about building weapons that don't allow the enemy to use their weapons at all? Not to get super sci-fi, but if we had nano-robots constantly scouring through enemy territory and disabling weapons (without the enemy knowing) and attaching themselves to the individuals themselves and broadcasting location while disabling the individuals motor skills. Just a thought.
@rexregum: No. It's manual bolt weapon. The under-barrel shotgun is mainly there for breeching doors. Lock buster rounds normally don't have the energy to cycle a semi-automatic action, so you use a manual action.
And this comment is from a user who's from; Slovakia. And says Americans have very low weapons... Hmm and what best weapons do you have of us? Oh bending/spreading over for Russia?
british army use shit like this already and plus we have invented a technology which makes us invisible look it up and america doesnt have it lmao and wont ever have it haha
not the ones in your house, you cant see the but when an object disrupts this field we can see it so somehow they reduce the amount of disruptions in the waves so then they can make it that we cant see a certain colour that well. AAAGGHHH!!!!!!!!!
microwaves have nothing to do with sound, microwaves are electromagnetic photons being sent at the speed of light at a certain frequency, changes in frequency change the type of wave and its strength, sound is simply the information your brain processes from air particles hitting your ear drums. BIG DIFFERENCE
Microwaves are electromagnetic waves with wavelengths ranging from as long as one meter down to as short as one millimeter, or equivalently, with frequencies between 300MHz (0.3 GHz) and 300 GHz.
NEW technology that can make tanks invisible has been unveiled by Britain's Ministry of Defence.
In secret trials last week, the army said it had made a vehicle completely disappear and predicted an invisible tank would be ready for service by 2012.
The new technology uses cameras and projectors to beam images of the surrounding landscape onto a tank.
The result is that anyone looking in the direction of the vehicle only sees what is beyond it and not the tank itself.
hahaha that technology isn't available yet. they can only make very small things invisible and they can't even do it at the visible light spectrum, only in other wavelengths. you should stop lying.
Oh boy, yet another idiot who knows nothing about guns opening their mouth. Yes I know it's the M110, that the military designation for that rifle. It's still the same commercial AR-10 that came out 50 years ago. They just slapped some rails on it but internally it's still the same gas impingement system that Eugene Stoner developed over half a century ago. They just use words like "innovative", "cutting-edge" and "force multiplier" to sell it better. You morons will fall for any marketing ploy.
"Sniper rifle" is a subjective term that's determined by a weapon's application. The M110 is based on the half century old AR-10 and are operationally identical. How is that so hard for you to understand you retarded little cunt?
So the M110 is based on the mechanism of the Ar-10!!! Wow, its like my eyes have been opened by your wisdom...... so I suppose that since the M-16, M-4, M-249, etc, etc, etc are all derived from the AR-10 design, they aren't any better than the AR-10 either? And all those weapons are just marketing ploys that didn't improve on an older system?
Man the vast majority of Western firearms over the last 50 years (save recent developments) are based on the design of Eugene Stoner.
THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS ABOUT KEEPING THE GOVERNMENT IN CHECK. It doesn't say anything about "rifles and shotguns" or "pistols." It says "arms," which means all weapons.
A reasonable interpretation is 'all weapons that currently exist.' It's ludicrous to argue that the founding fathers thought the general public should be armed with nuclear weapons. It's actually the other way around; the amendment describes the right to bear some form of arms, but says nothing regarding what kind and doesn't prohibit the government banning specific types of weapon from civilian use.
Then by your definition, the Congress can limit weapons to knives and clubs and still be OK in regards to the 2nd Amendment? That's what your argument boils down to.
When will people understand that it's not the WEAPONS that are at issue, it's the use of them that's the issue? I contend that there is no difference between a cop, a member of the armed forces, and a regular citizen on the street. The Second Amendment secures the other 9 in the Bill of Rights!
No, since court decisions have determined that the right to bear arms includes the right to bear firearms. It's all a matter of interpretation, but a 'well regulated militia' is somewhat different to 'completely unregulated private citizens.'
Bear in mind the second amendment also has no provision for removing arms from people while they're *in prison*. Would you argue this omission means prisoners have a right to be as or more heavily armed than the men guarding them?
Oh, ya, the beneficient courts have saved us there. Right? I have another question for you, then: where is this "regulated militia?" If you say "the National Guard," I will laugh at you for your idiocy. If the NG is a "militia," then how come the fedgov takes it over, like right now in our foreign wars? Seems to me every true militia gets shut down by the BATF and FBI. I still say all people should have access to all weapons. GUNS DONT KILL PEOPLE.
The lack of a 'militia' is largely because modern wars have proven how ineffectual they are in defending a nation from anything; no militia has ever defeated a modern armed force without massive external support.
And no, people should not have 'all guns.' There is no reason a civilian would need to own a surface-to-air missile or automatic grenade launcher, and given the damage that could be done by one in the wrong hands, every reason they should not be allowed to have one.
Again, the Second Amendment simply says the people have a right to be armed. Because it's so vague about what 'arms' are or what the right to bear them entails, the lawmakers have had to work to turn it into something workable.
To put it another way, it's technically in line with 2a to ban the sale, manufacture and import of every weapon in existence because people can still arm themselves with power tools and planks of wood; it says nothing about the right to *buy* weapons, after all.
ARMS is not "defined?" Neither is "it" but that doesn't mean we don't know what the definition is. Here's a law dictionary definition from 1856: ARMS. Any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes in his hands, or uses in his anger, to cast at, or strike at another.
When, the is the big difference between a "civilian" and a magic "law officer" or "military person?" A badge? Some kind of special insignia on their arm? Dogtags? By your thoughts, we shouldn't allow truckers to carry 40,000 pounds of HAZMAT because they might "go nuts." Wait, anyone with 15 gallons of gasoline in their car might too! Oh, what about those evil pilots? We saw what they did on 9/11! And those pharmacists with all those drugs? AIEEEE!
The main difference is those things have lawful uses. There is no lawful use a civilian could have for a missile designed to shoot down aircraft or a gun designed to fire grenades. There are plenty of illegal uses, however. Your argument is similar to claiming the first amendment allows the publication of libel and slander because it doesn't specifically disallow it. It's fairly obvious it doesn't intend that, or for the right to bear arms to mean anyone should be armed with anything.
good, now heat up my MREs
Iriatv 5 months ago 14
@Hachvogenn Actually the microwave was created by the military =P
Commando874 5 months ago
"creates a heating affect" also known as boiling the water inside of your cells
WhiskeySixxTn 5 months ago 11
wtf at the microwave..
MrSniperscope 6 months ago
415 degree oven are they trying to burn people
guitardude671 1 year ago 59
the only ones in use are the 2 snipers all other ones where ditched because of the price
xxbryan715xx 1 year ago
some of those new SAWs were shit....
Sturmmann 1 year ago
ACCESS DENIED *microwave*
YellowLegion 1 year ago 6
microwave? o you mean instant cancer machine
AtomicFreerun 1 year ago 11
just throw snakes! everybody hates snakes !
Havergoe 1 year ago 71
i wonder how good this feels on full power at point blank
NexusFawx 1 year ago
It really is as easy as it seems in Call of Duty to shoot some of these guns.
sliverazuria 1 year ago
The attachable 'nade launcher for the M4A3 and the newest sniper rifle both look just like the guns from Halo Reach.
retardrepellent 1 year ago
Waffensystem Modell SturmGewehr 44 St.Gw.44 7_92_33mm
MP44StG44Page 1 year ago
they should roll one of those ActiveDenialSystem whenever theres a riot.
its a party pooper
RevitalizedVessel 1 year ago
ADS? Stopping freedom fighting hippies? Richard Nixon approves
CDRNonsense 1 year ago
and I'm proud to be an american because if I wasn't I'd probably be dead.
BootyBot 1 year ago 3
I bet it is harmful for the balls, to sit in this hummer :(
uliqed 1 year ago
well, the war business needs more income =)
ponchoboy00 1 year ago
it will happen... Depopulation... Watch this video on You Tube, by Hal Lindsey Billionaires Decide Who Lives Who Dies
onstageagain 1 year ago
microwave tank ... damn that thing reminds me of CnC. I wonder where that tech can go if you crank up the voltage ...
SonOfTerra92 1 year ago
this shit would be so useful in the first days of the iraq war
lucas503 1 year ago
Do they test it on women and children ?
sidecrank 1 year ago
ahuh what next???? TERMINATOR???
lapulapu12345 1 year ago 4
these things are against humanity. only dead knows the meaning of life.
FARAZV 1 year ago
that new grenade launcher sucks ass. I HATE it. I want my M203 back
itisthechad 1 year ago
lol almost 2011 and no laser wall thing
dithyramb956 1 year ago
what the f**k is next, thats rediculous . . 2010 america develops brain wave crowd dispersing weapon, that f**ks with your mind making you run away in fear . . not the future i want to see
colgiljnr 1 year ago
ray gun jaay
R3tArdXd 1 year ago
DEATH RAYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
crazendisturbed 1 year ago
has anyone notice that somehow the us army gets the latest stuff?
furrysega7 1 year ago
SHIT A HITMARKER NO WAY!
Quicksilver4991 1 year ago
its ridicoulous how expensive these things will be
ATEAMZZZZ90786987645 1 year ago
RUN ITS ATACK OF THE TENNIS BALLS!
SuperJacob619 1 year ago 2
gay and gay... 1st/ why the hell we need a shotgun onto the m4 not like we are going to use it every door we kick it and it is bulky..
2/ m203 i rather stick with the old school m203. that thing is bulky plus adding more extra pouch on ur service rifle.. A++ for the Saw other than that suck balls We need new body armor design !!!
Vietboy1st 1 year ago
:36 M320! I wanna see wanna of those fired
TheCrazyrogue666 1 year ago
they look like toys... I bet a kid could use those. why cant people understand that these things are used for killing people!
ipkut0day 1 year ago
they are using this heat gun system in California Jails to control unruly inmates
itsmonti1 1 year ago
I can't figure out how the US can keep affording new weapons when she is almost bankrupt. She is fighting old AK-47's with new rifles costing thousands of dollars. It's like a mad spending spree using unlimited credit card. Thing is the Total US govt debt is like 90% of GDP already and the recession is still ongoing with 10% unemployed. Kinda scary to see how long democracy can be sustained by this kind of free spending.
AccordGTR 1 year ago
green peace has called the active denial system "inhumane". I think its more humane to make someone feel like they are burning than to shoot and kill them
KiwiTomCrawford 1 year ago
PFFT.... "There's really no kick to it at all!"
malofa99 1 year ago
i dont want to get shot in the head with theis guns im only 13 ):
nrk513 1 year ago
by spending 600 BILLION A YEAR. no wonder why we are in a recession. if you added up all the military spending in the world from every single country and made it into a pie chart, the U.S. would take up about half the damn chart. thats how much we waste. oh well at least when we have a real war then we will be showing off the never before seen technology and it will be awesome to see all the new gadgets and planes that are top secret right now.
xSlapshot49x 1 year ago
shooting someone is a bit brutal , so , let's cook'em alive instead
patator2512 1 year ago
all the weapons do the same work...they Kill!!
egw2009 1 year ago
We have hi tech weapons but we can't find Bin Laden. That is sad =(
Imurjudge 1 year ago
ADS = lame. In it's current form. Only truly practical area of use is at roadblocks in rural areas. In a city it's mostly useless as you have to close within small arms range to use it at which point baddies can just lite it up, so then to avoid that circumstance, you have to waste time, effort, and manpower to secure it's flanks to prevent it from being neutralized which in turn slows it's deployment time which in turn reduces it's effectivess and practicality.
GirlsGamesGunsGuitar 1 year ago
xm26 yea
dontmakemeMAD1990 1 year ago
wow propaganda to the max
terrorhunter 1 year ago
I wanna get hit! With the heat thing I'll b the human guinea pig!
nugg3ttoprock 1 year ago
Haha the army made a microwave gun awesome! lol
Halfbakedmass 1 year ago
and now lets spend that money on science for peace and exploration. That would benefit humans much more
Gine012 1 year ago
haha, 95 gigahertz, which is getting a little bit technical
Splooshiba 1 year ago
awsome
MrBlindboy10 1 year ago
It is said that the technology given to and in view of the public can be from 25+ years behind our Actual potential. So, for years conspiracy theorists have speculated that our emotions can be manipulated from frequencies sent from satellites and other machinery from space. If this theory is correct, the Active Denial System is just a little snippet of our actual technological ability. That's quite scary. Imagine what they can do from space. Just a thought
dzire08 1 year ago
tennis balls?thats awesome we use bloody potatoes and broomsticks and they hurt like hell. was great fun getting revenge tho
Dragonsway 1 year ago
how about the dragon skin?
noelsoong777 1 year ago
i bet the active denial system can damage eye tissue, which is notorious for getting heat damage ie 'glass blowers cataracts'
islandsjim 1 year ago
All those hi-tech weapons but it all comes down to a solidier. If his mental capabilities are strong in the actual battlefield. Just a reality check.
OTAKUJHE 1 year ago
They were shouting "No more beer!"?
taitungknight 1 year ago
ohhhh microvave!!!!!
Pasdaran1 1 year ago
shotgun attachment on m4????
heaven has called
timnlin 1 year ago
I like how they show army personel using this to disperse a crowd. The first time it was fielded, it was used against peaceful civilian protesters at the Pittsburg G20 summit.
Hooray for technology, huh?
EikC 1 year ago
Point that giant microwave at your balls for a while and il bet they'll explode :L
TREVORS481 1 year ago
The ActiveDenialSystem is scary for any freedom loving citizen.
henik9 1 year ago 360
Not as scary as psychotic, rioting citizens terrorizing innocent people.
joshua81em 1 year ago
@henik9
No its not. I can wrap myself in metals to deflect the microwaves. Furthermore, I can build the same dang thing in my home, and shoot them with it, too.
MrTurdFurgeson 1 year ago
@henik9 True. There's a reason they don't want to end the war. Without it they'd have no reason to stop inventing ways to handle dissenters...uh I'm mean insurgents.
prodriver8108 1 year ago
WT? They are frying those guys
GWestNorthside 1 year ago 23
This gear is amazing but I`d pass on wearing and carrying it all in a sticky hot Jungle environment or in the middle of a sweltering desert. Gonna be soaked in sweat and exhausted.
tku28 1 year ago
That ads, is slick.
m52spy 2 years ago
HK-416, Dragon Skin, Land Warrior Program, Liquid Hydroflex, Portable UAV's, Intelligent Friend/Foe heat signature identification system, Infantry HUD, MULE, SWORDS, and GLADIATOR robots.
THOSE are the weapons of war our soldiers need right now.
Give the XM-320 to the police, and that modular accesory shotgun looks way to bulky. Just take an semi-auto shotgun, and saw off the stock, put a rail on it and attach it.
arandomperson3 2 years ago 2
No Hk-416,the Scar-L !!
11251309 1 year ago
@arandomperson3
dragon skin actually failed in testing and if you look more into actual tests of some of the guns and why they arent being used you will be surprised
theme57 1 year ago
@arandomperson3 about the M-16 under barrel shotgun the military already has one & it looks cool, I mean action movie cool.
TogieTung 1 year ago
@arandomperson3 you read the wikipedia too much
hhhhhhyy 1 year ago
microwaves right into your eyes.
Mmm, I wonder what would be the longterm effects of a short exposure...
Volunteers?
northerntropics 2 years ago 8
wot happens if u shoot at the radiological dish would it affect its combat capabilites
leesgholden 2 years ago
@leesgholden lets just hope the wind doesn't pick up before the people clear out xD
Stevennickel 1 year ago
3:11 git off mah lawn ya damn hippies!!
bopomofo 2 years ago
i wish the British army got a few good upgrades
Philtards 2 years ago
remote turrets thats amazing.... Someone finally got smart and attached a camara to a turret rather then putting a guy on a 50 cal... and it cheap... now they just gotta put armor on humvees and they got a real good fire support unit... Rpg or nothing.
robrocks56 2 years ago
my fav is the 240 bravo i dont like the 249 saw that much to be honest. nice shot gun attachment to the m4. havent seen that before
BornInTheCreek 2 years ago
I wonder if the mock protestors were chanting, "Stop the Bloody Wars". XD
ZWXYQV 2 years ago
I wonder if the mock protestors were chanting, "Stop the Bloody Wars!" XD
ZWXYQV 2 years ago
Not new anymore. Old video, we've got much later and more effective weapons.
Mister86Productions 2 years ago
active denial system = instant win
Bobfishownz 2 years ago
now video gamers will want to join the army lol
ownedya22 2 years ago
the ray gun doesnt give you cancer. ive watched other vids about this new wep and they tested it and it soesnt cause anything
rebelmaster47556 2 years ago
we are all screwed
prevention552 2 years ago
What do you guys think about building weapons that don't allow the enemy to use their weapons at all? Not to get super sci-fi, but if we had nano-robots constantly scouring through enemy territory and disabling weapons (without the enemy knowing) and attaching themselves to the individuals themselves and broadcasting location while disabling the individuals motor skills. Just a thought.
JohnMichaelGonska 2 years ago
cool shit, i hope they get these to our guys in the field asap
everydayhero26 2 years ago 11
2:50 thats probably cancerous-_-
darkj3am 2 years ago 7
hmmm so are dense rocks
SobaniForce 2 years ago
hahah yeah i was thinking same thing
bleushift 2 years ago
definetly haha.
placebo4yo 2 years ago
The video game similarities make it easier to be completely detached. Super progress.
smmeegal 2 years ago 2
Instead of these blokes practising killing can they come and help me make our home less draughty n help me grow some food please?
smmeegal 2 years ago
did the underslung shotgun keep jamming or was it the way it was meant to be operated?
rexregum 2 years ago
@rexregum: No. It's manual bolt weapon. The under-barrel shotgun is mainly there for breeching doors. Lock buster rounds normally don't have the energy to cycle a semi-automatic action, so you use a manual action.
MorganKeyes 2 years ago
Can I get one for hunting rabbits?
cyberhuninvan 2 years ago 4
i like the modular accery shotgun, with the explosive rounds they have for shotguns it might replace the boom tube
UberVulf 2 years ago
2:38 wonder if it gives your cancer
hondaaccourd5 2 years ago 7
that ADS sounded as if it could cause cancer, like ppl who use mobile phones loads because of the microwaves or sumthin
airsoftgunrunner 2 years ago
hehe gun fights will become just as easy as they are in video games
israelfails 2 years ago
why creat new weapons
just new ways to kill people
stupid
reallly
baka
randhawa72 2 years ago
human frymaster 3000 they gonna fry your eggs!
aintabsi 2 years ago
LOL its only upgraded airsoft guns :D:DD americans you have very low weapons :) :D:D:D let hide them :D:Dd
5520211 2 years ago
And this comment is from a user who's from; Slovakia. And says Americans have very low weapons... Hmm and what best weapons do you have of us? Oh bending/spreading over for Russia?
GwarSick 2 years ago
Grenade launcher shown sucks compared to Device DM
adrastea99 2 years ago
that s.a.w. should come with a boom tube collapsable stock instead of the own shown. its alot mor comfortable, reliable, and has a few more options
LeekyChicken 2 years ago
i would like to try the grenade launcher i wonder how much recoil it has
haloandairsoft 2 years ago
grenade would freeze in the launcher in the Russian winterz....
IronManu77 2 years ago
same as any other 40 i think
RedPower012 2 years ago 4
Ha, jam at 1:59
Stopthewar17 2 years ago 4
Yeah!!!! they look so comfortable, just like a video game.......we can kill the humans faster..
1oneeno 2 years ago 94
@1oneeno what if that particular human is trying to kill you?
chrisbrodz 1 year ago
@1oneeno how should soldiers kill people? should we make sure that our casualties are equal to theirs?
panzer903 1 year ago
@1oneeno what did you think it was for? Huggin' and kissin'?
titbits17 1 year ago
OH NO! TENNIS BALLS! LOOK OUT!
wnxsystem 2 years ago 139
@wnxsystem yeah these not american tennisballs are a serious problem that has to be killed without a reason ! american style ;D
ABCMATTISSOMMER 1 year ago
@wnxsystem WE CANT STOP EM!!! WERE ALL DEAD!!!
1Airsoftsniper 1 year ago
yeah the British have done the same but put in on a land rover it looks kewl
solidkid95 2 years ago
the last weapon is develpoed for protestors
seabear145 2 years ago
woaaa... its soo propaganda.... its like that first sentence alone had to be approved by George Bush.
Elephantintheroom01 2 years ago
its look it up cut head and i never watched harry potter
scouse180 2 years ago
cool but they should make new armour not just guns
goldenacers 2 years ago
british army use shit like this already and plus we have invented a technology which makes us invisible look it up and america doesnt have it lmao and wont ever have it haha
scouse180 2 years ago
hey "scouse180"...do you realise that Harry Potter and theinvisibility coat are not real ????
hahahahahahahahaha
anteracmacash 2 years ago 3
its true the British army are testing cloaking devises for tanks look it up on google
solidkid95 2 years ago
and those are...
anteracmacash 2 years ago
its weird nothing is made, yet its all to do with magnetic fields and all that shit
solidkid95 2 years ago 2
so your talking about a floating tank or something????
anteracmacash 2 years ago
No, there are microwaves everywhere
not the ones in your house, you cant see the but when an object disrupts this field we can see it so somehow they reduce the amount of disruptions in the waves so then they can make it that we cant see a certain colour that well. AAAGGHHH!!!!!!!!!
solidkid95 2 years ago
microwawes are high frequency SOUND wawes...while color of ANY object has to do with light...but who am I to judge...
anteracmacash 2 years ago
What are you talking about, microwaves aren't sound, they're electromagnetic waves.
sdfsdf666 2 years ago
microwaves have nothing to do with sound, microwaves are electromagnetic photons being sent at the speed of light at a certain frequency, changes in frequency change the type of wave and its strength, sound is simply the information your brain processes from air particles hitting your ear drums. BIG DIFFERENCE
mukers 2 years ago
Microwaves are electromagnetic waves with wavelengths ranging from as long as one meter down to as short as one millimeter, or equivalently, with frequencies between 300MHz (0.3 GHz) and 300 GHz.
right out of wiki
soulstarter 2 years ago
invisibility/supreme camouflage
BornCitizen 2 years ago
NEW technology that can make tanks invisible has been unveiled by Britain's Ministry of Defence.
In secret trials last week, the army said it had made a vehicle completely disappear and predicted an invisible tank would be ready for service by 2012.
The new technology uses cameras and projectors to beam images of the surrounding landscape onto a tank.
The result is that anyone looking in the direction of the vehicle only sees what is beyond it and not the tank itself.
Deed1992 2 years ago
preety cool...but is still think that the backbone of every force is a soldier with his weapon..
anteracmacash 2 years ago 9
Im surprised you know this. Hell, we wouldnt know ANYTHING that was going on in area 51.....
xxMafia101 2 years ago
hahaha that technology isn't available yet. they can only make very small things invisible and they can't even do it at the visible light spectrum, only in other wavelengths. you should stop lying.
Barfunk 2 years ago
if you heard about it then the trials were not that secret
bigdawgD2003 2 years ago
and what proof do you have of this
UberVulf 2 years ago
nothing a nuke couldnt fix lol
omtay318 2 years ago
share this with marines
OFFICIALGAMEFREAKS 2 years ago
2:53 cool
tizight00 2 years ago
omg they taken the tec from 2:45 from aliens !
flobba123 2 years ago
next development of the remote joystick gun is of course... a robot. (less risk of casualties *on "our side")
google "big dog" weapons platform
reptilespantoso 2 years ago
the thing with that is, that the militairy says the target will get out of the way.
Q: well what happens if the target is stuck (at the head of a mass demonstration?) a very likely scenario.
A: the target will be fried, since it's a giant outdoor microwave
grilled targets now in your hometown. yay!!
reptilespantoso 2 years ago 2
its not going to fry them due to the fact that it is a none lethal system the people just feel as if they are in a microwave or oven
Nicholas304 2 years ago
They said the same thing abaut tasers!
dewzs 2 years ago 2
oops we f*cked up the frequency! omg look at that guy burning!
jlasud 2 years ago 2
Oooh, Active Denial System.
Way to get cancer. Nice one :|
kongo034 2 years ago
An active denial system which will deny caring folk the chance to be heard, seen, or remain where They Want to Be ...
netlethe 2 years ago
whats that..a mobile microwave oven...or an electric roaster?...
kamotepotatas 2 years ago
That's some scary stuff :P
relicen1 2 years ago
you evidently don't know much about guns, because a sniper rifle with the kick of a m16 is a big improvement
chunkymonkey0724 2 years ago 2
It's not a "new" and "improved" rifle, it's a 50 year old AR10 with rails. And his claim that it has the same felt recoil as an M16 is bullshit.
redmunkee 2 years ago
lol thats a M110 fool, its replacing the M24
NifoOtiBoy 2 years ago
Oh boy, yet another idiot who knows nothing about guns opening their mouth. Yes I know it's the M110, that the military designation for that rifle. It's still the same commercial AR-10 that came out 50 years ago. They just slapped some rails on it but internally it's still the same gas impingement system that Eugene Stoner developed over half a century ago. They just use words like "innovative", "cutting-edge" and "force multiplier" to sell it better. You morons will fall for any marketing ploy.
redmunkee 2 years ago
Except that the AR-10 wasn't a sniper rifle....... moron. M110 has much greater range.
NifoOtiBoy 2 years ago
"Sniper rifle" is a subjective term that's determined by a weapon's application. The M110 is based on the half century old AR-10 and are operationally identical. How is that so hard for you to understand you retarded little cunt?
redmunkee 2 years ago
So the M110 is based on the mechanism of the Ar-10!!! Wow, its like my eyes have been opened by your wisdom...... so I suppose that since the M-16, M-4, M-249, etc, etc, etc are all derived from the AR-10 design, they aren't any better than the AR-10 either? And all those weapons are just marketing ploys that didn't improve on an older system?
Man the vast majority of Western firearms over the last 50 years (save recent developments) are based on the design of Eugene Stoner.
NifoOtiBoy 2 years ago
We do not need new weapons, we need love!
brightingsky2009 2 years ago
Coming soon to a neighborhood near you.
ret 2 years ago
radio waves cant do that?, its a giant MICROWAVE oven. crazy white people!
chollonerd 2 years ago 3
well no its radio waves they vibrate the atoms highly and it feels hot
Janilenae2007 2 years ago
Just wait until we invent lasers weapons then well start feeling the heat LOL
TheOwNeR395 3 years ago
THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS ABOUT KEEPING THE GOVERNMENT IN CHECK. It doesn't say anything about "rifles and shotguns" or "pistols." It says "arms," which means all weapons.
PHenry500 3 years ago 3
A reasonable interpretation is 'all weapons that currently exist.' It's ludicrous to argue that the founding fathers thought the general public should be armed with nuclear weapons. It's actually the other way around; the amendment describes the right to bear some form of arms, but says nothing regarding what kind and doesn't prohibit the government banning specific types of weapon from civilian use.
LuciferG61 3 years ago
Then by your definition, the Congress can limit weapons to knives and clubs and still be OK in regards to the 2nd Amendment? That's what your argument boils down to.
When will people understand that it's not the WEAPONS that are at issue, it's the use of them that's the issue? I contend that there is no difference between a cop, a member of the armed forces, and a regular citizen on the street. The Second Amendment secures the other 9 in the Bill of Rights!
PHenry500 3 years ago
No, since court decisions have determined that the right to bear arms includes the right to bear firearms. It's all a matter of interpretation, but a 'well regulated militia' is somewhat different to 'completely unregulated private citizens.'
Bear in mind the second amendment also has no provision for removing arms from people while they're *in prison*. Would you argue this omission means prisoners have a right to be as or more heavily armed than the men guarding them?
LuciferG61 3 years ago
Oh, ya, the beneficient courts have saved us there. Right? I have another question for you, then: where is this "regulated militia?" If you say "the National Guard," I will laugh at you for your idiocy. If the NG is a "militia," then how come the fedgov takes it over, like right now in our foreign wars? Seems to me every true militia gets shut down by the BATF and FBI. I still say all people should have access to all weapons. GUNS DONT KILL PEOPLE.
PHenry500 3 years ago
The lack of a 'militia' is largely because modern wars have proven how ineffectual they are in defending a nation from anything; no militia has ever defeated a modern armed force without massive external support.
And no, people should not have 'all guns.' There is no reason a civilian would need to own a surface-to-air missile or automatic grenade launcher, and given the damage that could be done by one in the wrong hands, every reason they should not be allowed to have one.
LuciferG61 3 years ago
Again, the Second Amendment simply says the people have a right to be armed. Because it's so vague about what 'arms' are or what the right to bear them entails, the lawmakers have had to work to turn it into something workable.
To put it another way, it's technically in line with 2a to ban the sale, manufacture and import of every weapon in existence because people can still arm themselves with power tools and planks of wood; it says nothing about the right to *buy* weapons, after all.
LuciferG61 3 years ago
ARMS is not "defined?" Neither is "it" but that doesn't mean we don't know what the definition is. Here's a law dictionary definition from 1856: ARMS. Any thing that a man wears for his defence, or takes in his hands, or uses in his anger, to cast at, or strike at another.
Pretty damn clear to me.
PHenry500 3 years ago
When, the is the big difference between a "civilian" and a magic "law officer" or "military person?" A badge? Some kind of special insignia on their arm? Dogtags? By your thoughts, we shouldn't allow truckers to carry 40,000 pounds of HAZMAT because they might "go nuts." Wait, anyone with 15 gallons of gasoline in their car might too! Oh, what about those evil pilots? We saw what they did on 9/11! And those pharmacists with all those drugs? AIEEEE!
PHenry500 3 years ago
The main difference is those things have lawful uses. There is no lawful use a civilian could have for a missile designed to shoot down aircraft or a gun designed to fire grenades. There are plenty of illegal uses, however. Your argument is similar to claiming the first amendment allows the publication of libel and slander because it doesn't specifically disallow it. It's fairly obvious it doesn't intend that, or for the right to bear arms to mean anyone should be armed with anything.
LuciferG61 3 years ago