@jjpetkusiii it seems the only thing your ability to read various languages has given you is the ability to misinterpet the bible in its original languages and in english as well. ROFLMAO. For some reason you like to advertise that blunder loud and clear. Still dont see a chapter and verse with the words "faith alone" Whats the matter cant come up with one to support youre erronious doctrinal beliefs. Come on missy....surely you can come up with "ONE" ROFLMAO.
@jjpetkusiii just a quick heads up for all of those people that wish to engage either jjpetkusiii or boggymark1. These are the same person spamming under multiple identities.
Get busy and give this some negative votes. BTW youre slowin down dog. 25 more posts to respond to. Chop chop ROFLMAO.My goodness, Jo, you must be terribly full of hate? indeed ! You should repent and be saved by the Grace of the Lord.
It is funny that Cornelius Van Til loved paradox. His best known writings pertain to the Doctrine of the Trinity, which he hashed up so badly because of his love of Greek philosophy. In his writings on the Trinity, his desperate attempts to HARMONIZE the rubbish he taught, he had to make reference to the nebulous and mystical teachings of pagan Greek philosophers Parmenides and Heraclites. He applied their teachings on the "one and the many" to the CHRISTIAN doctrine of the Trinity.
Ralph Allan Smith, interpreting Van Til's tripe, writes:
"Van Til offered an approach to Christian apologetics that was new.. ..he adopted the Kantian transcendental form of argumentation to Christian.. Van Til recommended the use of a transcendental argument to prove the truth of Christianity. A transcendental argument is thought to differ in structure from a deductive argument. Empirical verification was thought to be the test of truth." -
This has been flagged as spam show
@Redbeetle <===== is a hill billy. yeeee haaaa
NelsonIncredulous 1 month ago
Comment removed
alexmcginness 2 months ago
Comment removed
alexmcginness 3 months ago
Comment removed
alexmcginness 6 months ago
Comment removed
alexmcginness 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jjpetkusiii it seems the only thing your ability to read various languages has given you is the ability to misinterpet the bible in its original languages and in english as well. ROFLMAO. For some reason you like to advertise that blunder loud and clear. Still dont see a chapter and verse with the words "faith alone" Whats the matter cant come up with one to support youre erronious doctrinal beliefs. Come on missy....surely you can come up with "ONE" ROFLMAO.
alexmcginness 7 months ago
Comment removed
alexmcginness 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jjpetkusiii just a quick heads up for all of those people that wish to engage either jjpetkusiii or boggymark1. These are the same person spamming under multiple identities.
Get busy and give this some negative votes. BTW youre slowin down dog. 25 more posts to respond to. Chop chop ROFLMAO.My goodness, Jo, you must be terribly full of hate? indeed ! You should repent and be saved by the Grace of the Lord.
alexmcginness 7 months ago
Thanks!! To the Point!!
kanglingliuhuang 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Correction!
My second (2.) post, the third line should read:
"he (Van Til) adopted the Kantian transcendental form of argumentation to Christian apologetics." (emphasis mine)
AFRlKlTTY 11 months ago 3
1.
It is funny that Cornelius Van Til loved paradox. His best known writings pertain to the Doctrine of the Trinity, which he hashed up so badly because of his love of Greek philosophy. In his writings on the Trinity, his desperate attempts to HARMONIZE the rubbish he taught, he had to make reference to the nebulous and mystical teachings of pagan Greek philosophers Parmenides and Heraclites. He applied their teachings on the "one and the many" to the CHRISTIAN doctrine of the Trinity.
cont...
AFRlKlTTY 11 months ago 3
2.
Ralph Allan Smith, interpreting Van Til's tripe, writes:
"Van Til offered an approach to Christian apologetics that was new.. ..he adopted the Kantian transcendental form of argumentation to Christian.. Van Til recommended the use of a transcendental argument to prove the truth of Christianity. A transcendental argument is thought to differ in structure from a deductive argument. Empirical verification was thought to be the test of truth." -
Van Til's Insights on the Trinity, page 12 & 13
AFRlKlTTY 11 months ago 3