Added: 4 years ago
From: Uralic
Views: 206,277
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,495)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • his is their vision and understanding of life and people. the greek god zeus and greek titans are cannibals and lustfull disrectitude "holy" creatures to them. opposite to that; turks , from the beginning of time believed only in one god and mercifulness and justice of the creator. they were shamanic nomads with great respect to nature and the living things on it.

  • west and europe have always written their own history. according to their mentality, the culture which is not them, are barbaric. this video is a proof to that . rome and other western civilisations, has always make exploitee's and exploited them with brute force. t

  • Turkey needs a leader like him nowadays :/

  • Barberian was your stupid mother,who was push you into your sad, stupid and unhappy life!

  • ffuck all the rasist gays animalsfuck off

  • 18 people from byzantine whose fathers fucked each other bdsm for 1000 years.

  • ALL HAIL ATTILA!!!!

  • DEATH TO _Insert Text Here_

  • DEATH TO McDonalds

  • ATILA IS MOST CANIBAL EVER

  • Turan shall come!

  • Duude! Stop changing the facts again! Turks created 17 nations so far ending with TURKIYE (hopefuly). The Huns was just one of the origins.

  • @sopar3169 Mongoloids created Huns who created Turks!!!

  • Romans are equally barbaric

  • @mishrik < - ASIAN CANIBAL

  • Long live. the noble and great Turk nation. my brothers.

  • @batux100 DEATH TO PANFASCIST Turkey

  • @unfukkkmee RESSURECTIZZZZZZZZZZ

  • @Pharenheitz SHUT UP

  • @unfukkkmee DEATH TO idiots

  • @Pharenheitz DEATH TO israel

  • @unfukkkmee DEATH TO Mr. Smith

  • @Pharenheitz KLOZE UR MOUTH

  • @unfukkkmee LIFE TO Freedom of Speech... DEATH TO Raciscts!

  • @Pharenheitz U ARE THE Racist, WHY THE ANGLO-GERMANS AKA ISRAEL IS FANATIC ENEMY OF GREEKS

  • @unfukkkmee Because you're a PARANOID SCHIZOPHRENIC.

  • @Pharenheitz BACK OFF AND DIE SON OF WHORE, Atilla BURN IN HELL NOW

  • @unfukkkmee AVENU SHALOM ALECHEIM AVENU SHALOM ALECHEIM AVENU SHALOM ALECHEIM SIMON TOV MAZZAL TOV SIMON TOV MAZZAL TOV AVENU SHALOM ALECHEIM

  • @Pharenheitz ''SHALOM'' WITH GUN IN HAND IS IMPOSIBLE, PUT THIS IN UR BEAIN PSEUDO-''ISRAELI'' FROM NORSTWEST EUROPE

  • @unfukkkmee I was raised by Greek Immigrants in a Jewish Neighborhood.

    You have a gun in your heart.

  • THE JEW IS RELIGION , IS NOT'' nation.''

    @Pharenheitz STOP THE PROPAGANDA AGAINST, THE GREEKS

  • Uyghurs, Altaic family, they are all seen as anchestors here in Turkey, because they really are the ancient Turkic people!

  • - Teşekkürler...

  • if Attilawas Turk than why is he Called ATTILA HUN

    his mother was an italian woman thats why he had the black hair, and he did not have them asian eyes some people pictured. His Father Was HUNGARIAN. Its true the hungarians had a shared past with turks, but that was nearly 1000 years Later!

  • @GhettoSapiens no...

  • @GhettoSapiens soo Hun is Turk andd Hungarian!!! Not different Hungarian and Turk in hun period!!!

  • Turkic and Magyar brotherhood forever!

  • Something doesn't fit.. Huns, are this days turks right?.. But why did their tribes held gathered to the east of europe and march upon rome from tthere, and not from where turks belong now..and march via Greece upon rome? Likely they should more be as many says.. Mongolians, norva pre russians? Im confused :P

  • Proud To Be TURK

  • no1 can know attilas family tree. but sumthin is certain that he united ural-altaic tribes who were always migrating to west. it didnt happen in 1 day. sycthians were also from central asia. in truth, according to holy book, noahs son Yafes, and his son Maek is seen as father of all ural-altaic nations. and they all come from Mu, the lost continent (look for vikipedia for deatiled info)

    but in asia, worlds greatest colonial empire was Uyghurs in 12.00 BC, buildin first pyramids&mummy technology

  • Hun Great TURKS

  • i want to see an eternal empire who protect sexy ladies from us dangerous males .

  • we need the huns to invade muslim and jew in west asia this the huns will have an eternal victory .

    badge ladies are my favourite too many fucking whites boring !

  • Attila wasn´t Magyar, just fanatics believe so, please don´t say bollocks

  • BİG TURK ATTİLA !

  • Being turk are realy related to feeling as a turk. it is based on comon culture, language, history, not only genetics. So all oguz turks, tatars, uzbeks, cuvash, also kazaks and kyrgızes are real turks (not turkic because it is a false expression. Turkic=Turki means "not turk but similar to turk". ) Turkistan(turkland=the land of turks) is the oldest name of all central asia, caucasia, southen and estern sybiria.Greetings from turkey to you, the brother. :)

  • @nurettinsarul there is no turkic or turkish mummies in East Turkestan... They are all tocharian iranic mummies... & huns were not europoids/caucasoids... they were pure asians...

  • @Askar9992/ On the other hand, being turk are realy related to feeling as a turk. it is based on comon culture, language, history, not only genetics. So all oguz turks, tatars, uzbeks, cuvash, also kazaks and kyrgızes are real turks (not turkic because it is a false expression. Turkic=Turki means "not turk but similar to turk". ) Turkistan(turkland=the land of turks) is the oldest name of all central asia, caucasia, southen and estern sybiria.Greetings from turkey to you, the brother. :)

  • @Askar9992 I wouldn't say they were 'purely' Mongoloid either. They migrated west and smelted with the Iranic remnants of the Scythians and the Sarmatians there, not to mention the huge amount of Gothic mercenaries/soldiers under Attila's command. But I'm sure the majority of the ethnic Huns looked South Siberian/Central Asian.

  • @OlCalif @Askar9992 Purity its not Gold we are discussing every one is mixed but the Identity is through what is predominant in them thats MONGOLOID BLOOD>>>>>>

  • Hungarians were turkish tribes that mixed with uralic tribes.They were totally 10 tribes. 7 tribes were turkish, 3 tribes were uralics. Surprisingly, 7 turkish tribes were effected by those 3 uralic tribes in all ways. By the way, turks come from the mixing of many finno-ugorics and some amerindians in very old past. So turks(in turkey,caucasia,central asia,balkans,moldova, south and east russia) are relatives of not only hungarians but also all finno-ugoric people.

  • Mongolian and Turkish people(HUNS)may be brothers but their races are differant.Turks(HUNS) are in the turanid type of caucasoid race,but mongols are in mongoloid race.Turks appeared by the mixing of finno-ugorics with some amerindians.However Mongols appeared after some another amerindians evaluated into mongoloids. Even if we say turks and mongols are distant relatives, we can claim such a relativity also for turks and russians or turks and scandinavians because of Turks’ finno-ugoric roots.

  • @nurettinsarul turks are not HUNS... turkish people are genetecelly pure indo-europeans...

  • @Askar9992/ The word "turk" is the oldest name of the people who come from huns,kypchaks, kumans, tatars, all oguz turks and central asian people (except mongols). Central asia, caucasia and southern russia is hystorically called "turkistan", the land of turks. One more point, we teach the history of huns to our children in turkey as some of he proudy parts of turkish history.

  • @Askar9992/ Many of Hungarians were turkish tribes that mixed with uralic tribes.They were totally 10 tribes. 7 tribes were turkish, 3 tribes were uralics. Surprisingly, 7 turkish tribes were much effected by those 3 uralic tribes in all ways. By the way, turks come from the mixing of many finno-ugorics and some amerindians in very old past. So turks(in turkey,caucasia,central asia,balkans,moldova, south and east russia) are relatives of not only hungarians but also all finno-ugoric people.

  • @nurettinsarul hungarians were not turkish tribes... turkish peoples are nation which formed in Anatolia, mainly by greeks, persians & etc europeans... they carrying just few turkic R1b genetic... magyars - proto- hungarians were ugric peoples with some turkic admixture....

  • @Askar9992 /There are some serious theories that turks have emigrated to anatolia(Asia minör/Asian part of Turkey) and southern europe a few times in the history. The people in Troya and some other formar anatolians were turks who emigrated to anatolia from caucasia and central asia in the very old times. Maybe because of that, turkish and the other mediteranien peoples' genes are not so much differant.

  • @Askar9992/ Arkeologists and historians have found some hints about formar anatolian people's life styles such that they were simmilar to preturks'. Religious seramonies, kitchen equipments, figures in their writing or stuffs etc. By the way, Etruxes who have set up roma empiror were turks as many other formar anatolians. According to the last researchs, the genes of etruxes, turks of turkey, and the very old turkish skeletons found in central asia are surprisingly very similar.

  • @Askar9992/ And the mummies found in estern turkistan(the lands of uyghur turks in china) are very similar to turks of turkey and the other oguz turks. they are caucasoid and their haplogroups are very similar to turks of turkey. Namely anatolia were the land of turks in the history, is now and will be in the future.

  • @Askar9992/ Finally, if you continue to make desicion by looking at mongoloid featurs of kyrgiz and kazak turks, you continue to have false thoughts. They have mixed of mongols at least in the ratio of %20. Since Mongoloid features are dominat, they seem so mongoloid. For example, it is written in persian and chineese sources, kyrgizes were white and wavy red-haired only a few centuries ago. They were caucasoid(europid/white) as the -10 000 years old- mummies of uygur turks in china.

  • @nurettinsarul actually kyrgyz peoples have 70% R1a & 30% C3... you have just maximum 11% R1b.. 5-11% ... & there is no turkic mummies in China, they are tocharians' mummies... BTW I don't believe that ancient kyrgyz were white or something... event kipcaks' facial reconstrution was mongoloid just like avars....

    ancient turkic peoples were mongoloids, Bumin Kagan & other Gokturks' ruled were mongoloids... monuments & archeology proved it

  • @Askar9992/ %30 of C3 gen explain why kyrgız turks seem so mongoloid and pysichally differant from other turks. I just told about this mixing such that mongols have C3 gen a lot. According o the genetical searchs, the skeletons of ancient turks, oguz and uyghur turks are very similar to eachother.They are also related to kazak and kyrgız turks.By the way, the first kuman/kypchak turks were blonde and had blue or green eyes.The kypchak turks of north turkey and caucasia are still blonde.

  • @nurettinsarul I don't know were cumans blond or something.. they were mix of caucasoids & europoids

  • @Askar9992/ The Turks from kuman origin in north turkey,caucasia and some parts of south russia are still blond as me.(look at the school march in my channel.You will see my pictures at the beginning.) Some kumans mixed of mongols and some of them turned into mongoloid.Especially blond molgols and mongoloid turks have appeared by the mixing of mongols and kumans/kypchaks. If the limited effects of this mixing are neglected, Turks are generally caucasoid anyway.This is a scientifical knowladge.

  • @nurettinsarul Turkic people were from different origin, but turkic language is from asians

  • @nurettinsarul most turkic have mongoloid featers but not turkish people, becoz you have just 11% turkic R1b

  • Attila is a Turk.

    And Turks ancestor Huns.

    why change the story? We Turkey, we know our ancestors. It's nice to criticize my ancestors. (Huns, TURK) May God forgive you.

  • The name Attila is not turkic. The name is gothic. Ata = Vater ila = affectionate form by names in the Gothic language.

  • ATTILA THE HUN NEVER BEEN TERRORIST,I REALY HATE TO HEAR THIS FROM OUR FIRST KING OF THE HUNGARY,IF I COULD I WOULD SUE THE SIT OUT OF YOU WHO BRING UP THIS MOST HATED PERSON BULLSIT,AND MENTIONING ATTILA THE HUN LIKE A TERRORIST..

  • Hun&Turk=Blood Brothers

    TURAN!!!

  • @Askar590 Huns were Turkish, not Mongolians

  • Sorry, but the Huns NEVER been Turkish or Mongolians! I don`t have any problem with the Turkish or Mongolian people, but it`s just a different story :)))

  • @sugarstar01 what was your opinion based on? Huns were Turkic-Mongolic tribes of central asia.

  • @KingofKpop soo he was the same as genghis khan?

  • @Inpatientsnake Genghis Khan was Mongol for sure, he's the one who created Mongol empire. Attila was Hun, Huns were not Caucasian, Huns were divided into two major groups: White Huns and Black Huns they were scattered all over central asian from East Asian to Eastern Europe. Real Turks, Mongols, Tungus were all Turko-Mongolic people originated from inner Mongolia. 

  • @KingofKpop

    Atilla can't be other than MONGOLIA!

  • In that time of BARBARIC WORLD a BARBARIAN only can RULE!!!!

  • Today we put our new borns name Altay, Altan, Atilla ! Who are you to suggest us what and who was Atilla!!!

  • @KingofKpop That's the traditional theory. The origins of the Huns are not known to this day...just saying

  • @KingofKpop ALL ASIANS WITH BLANTED EYES ARE MONGOLIANS. AND  THE SLAVS ARE MONGOLIANS, TODAY

  • @sugarstar01 Turks had a great migration, they settled in Europe as Huns (Hun Turks), they forced all barbarian tribes to move into lands of Rome, that destroyed Rome, so Huns (Turks) are destroyed Rome with one migration, in 1071 Turks had another migration to into Anatolia, they were Oguz Turks, that forced Byzantium to move back to Europe in years, in 1453, Ottomans (Oguz Turks) conquered Constantinople, reason I told about this is, Hun Turks and Oguz Turks are diffrent but they are both Turk

  • @Lunelitius I just hate it how people mix the two words Turkish and Turkic together. 'Turkic' is a collective term to all Turkic peoples that include the peoples of Turkey (hence the word Turkish). I pray more people will learn the difference.

  • @Lunelitius Turks are Mongolian, coz mongolids who pillaged and raped Cuacosoids

  • @mishrik Cool story bro

  • @Lunelitius yes thats the story of present humans.

  • @Lunelitius THE  HUNS ARE GERMANS.

  • @unfukkkmee umm.. What?! Are you high?

  • @Lunelitius THIS IS HISTORICAL TRUTH

  • Atilla the Hun is the great grand father of both Turkic and Macar people

  • @TurkishHegemony I don't agains the Turks, but the Turks only conquered Hungary in the XV century for hundred fifty years want us to be muslims what we aren't and attacked Europe constantly! The Hungarians different than any nations around them that's why the Slaves did not like them or French or Romanians! Only brother is the Polish brothers who always helped them and we visa versa!!!

  • @MissKristinaBanana

    Before we Turkic and Macar people were influenced by middle eastern religions, we used to be shamanic and united, the Hungarians have become christians and Turks have become muslims. Lets go back to our roots Macar brothers!

  • @MissKristinaBanana You came from our Land south of Volga river. Turks and Macar people were same our religion was shamanism but we Turks we took Islam and Macar people become Christians. The name Attila is Turkic.

  • atilla was turk !!! hun is turk !! turkish legend Atilla !!! 

  • HUNGARIANS,TURKS,ALBANS, ARE BROTHERS.

  • TURK İS POWER......

  • Én udevilsya amikor már a magyarok! És megkérdeztem az egyik magyar, mint akkor

    Aksakal (régebbi, bodza), és azt mondta, túl Aksakal

  • Ez tartottak Almaty

    It was held in Almaty

  • Comment removed

  • I udevilsya when we had the Hungarians! And I asked one Hungary, as you will

    Aksakal (older, elder) and he told me, too Aksakal

  • The Huns Huns, but not Turks.

    Atilla's Huns invaded the Parthian Empire in the Balkans.

    Atilla Engadin increased fel.Keresztény ruling was the first in Europe.

  • @Askar590

    Turks are European? hahahahahahahahahaah

    Turk are not Altaic Peoples.

    Europe? hahahahahahaahahahahahahahahah­ahahahahahahahaah

  • @ThePhilosophie1 ps whats with all the "hahahahahahaha" you really finding this THAT funny?

  • @subedei30 yes you have like the same reason. But even as it makes me laugh with their commentary XD

  • @Askar590 so what? if someone with white skin, it is European?

    Attila was not a Mongol Turk

    stop making me laugh

  • Comment removed

  • @Askar590

    actually I just got information, Attila was a Turk and he spoke Turks

    Attila: One day the world will speak Turkish language

  • Comment removed

  • he whas aturk mongol, all turks are from mongol

  • @KurdSouth The Hun empires borders were from Hungary till China.The chinese build the wall against the hunnian raids.In this empire was a lot of kingdoms with autonomy and a lot of ethnics.On the eastside they were more asiatic.On the westside europid.Where the capital of Atilla was they looks definetly europid.Atilla's smalles son Csaba and his tribe went to the transylvanian hills after his father died.They still living there.Called Seclers.Read and search my friands!

  • tereg=tureg=turk=turkish????

  • Bir gün olaçak Turani kuraçagiz inshallah

  • you're right, Thephilosophie1

    Huns are the ancestors of the Turks

  • hahahahahahahaha

    you know nothing about the huns.

    I study the history, the Huns are the ancestors of the Turks

    Hungarian? hahahahhahahahaha

    Huns in the old Turkish "Han"which means:

    King, the leader, the powerful

    The history of Turkish history is the richest in the world.

    If you have a subjection, check yourself

    Ne mutlu Turkum diyene

  • @ThePhilosophie1 in Mongolian han means han as a king in english and also hun means man or person Hahahaha you also know nothing about huns????

  • @ThePhilosophie1 and the türkishes stay over everyone...i know a nation who think the same..they have a land since 60 years south from Turkey.Called Israel.

  • @ThePhilosophie1 , they misunderstand the conquered as the identity of huns how shameful

  • @ThePhilosophie1 The Huns Huns, but not Turks.

    Atilla's Huns invaded the Parthian Empire in the Balkans.

    Atilla Engadin increased fel.Keresztény ruling was the first in Europe.

  • @negyokru66 one of the ancestor of the Turk is the Huns

  • @ThePhilosophie1

    xiongnu was 4 folks unio: mongol, manchu, oghuz and ogur.

    iranic, uralic, türkic, mongolic which is you? all? :D ohh baby , others were nobodies?

  • @ThePhilosophie1 also de mongols

  • @ThePhilosophie1 everybody knows that huns are the ancestors of turkik peoples ! where were turks when quinn dynasty began to build the great wall against the huns in north east of china ? china'history is stromgly related to the huns ! the first chinese dynasty was a hun dynasty. did you know ?

  • the double curved bow is hun invention and used only by bloodbrother peoples related to the huns : mongols . turkish , and tatar peoples borned after centuries after the huns after their expansion from china into europe and asia . after the hun attacks the roman empire paid tribute to the huns in gold and after 30 years did not survived as an empire.

  • @ThePhilosophie1 hungarians are mixed peoples living in hungary ! but all these peoples have the same hun roots ! : huns from china and magyars from the volga : magors , uygurs and many others unified for expanson but all these peoples are ancient huns estabilished near river volga . the name of attila vas etele in turk meaning : volga

  • Respond to this video... turkish people is a mixture of hundred peoples ! the same is with huns ! just a blind man cannot observe that hun - turkish - mongol peoples are blood brothers having hun roots from china ! using the double curved hun invented bow ! the same war tactics ! ferocious warriors ! all defeatad peoples by huns became allied with hun , in their expansion if not they were exterminated ! they formed mixed families and blood brothers .

  • is there any connection between hunnic empire with chinese han ?

  • Let us all remember that 'turks' of Attila's era shared no resemblance to modern turks. Same with Greeks, Egyptians...you get the picture. There is lots of genetic drift. I agree that Attila looked more like a modern Hungarian or Romanian than a modern turk.

  • @whitehunter88

    Atilla was hungarian king, ogur and savar huns came to hungary in ad 373, with leader Kattar. Atilla was born here. Hephtalites or White huns made the Indian hunnic realm too. And kushans avars.

    Romanians are not huns or dacians, they are vlachs from Albania. Their first land the medieval Wallachia.

  • @HungarianHistory

    hahahahahahahaha

    you know nothing about the huns.

    I study the history, the Huns are the ancestors of the Turks

    Hungarian? hahahahhahahahaha

    Huns in the old Turkish "Han"which means:

    King, the leader, the powerful

    The history of Turkish history is the richest in the world.

    If you have a subjection, check yourself

  • @ThePhilosophie1

    hahahhah , you have nothing with Atilla who was ogur and not oghuz!

  • @HungarianHistory

    Atilla was a Turk

    Hungary did not have to prove that rich history is Hungarian Atilla hahahahahhahahahahahaahahahaha

  • @ThePhilosophie1

    in the xiongnu khanate lived 4 great groups, ogur huns, oghuz huns, manchus and mongols.

    the türks are from oghuz blue , heaven or kök türks.

    uyhgurs, bulgarians, and hungarians are from ogurs. (chuvashes, kazan tatars too)

    but these ogurs had unio too with hephtalite sabirs (magyar tribe) too and some other scytho-sarmatian , germnaic folks.

    i dont know blue türk rulers maybee some are from Atilla too. but Atilla ruled the european huns and not the kök türks or indian w. huns.

  • @HungarianHistory , Romanians are from Albania??

    LOL!!! Are you Hungarians mentally retarded?? What the fuck do you learn in your schools??? AHHAHAHAH

  • @gogoasacenusie

    you have albanian words, were from?

  • @HungarianHistory , it's called borrowing words dumbass like all neighbours do. You Hungarians have tones of Slavic words and even Turkish in your vocabulary. You can count by fingers the Albanian words in Romanian language you narrow-minded desperate man :)))) Big warm greetings to the Madjari people from Kazakhstan your genetical relatives :D What do you think they're doing at this hour?? Banging goats in the ass or sucking a donkey?! :)))

  • @gogoasacenusie

    its interrest which words are slavic r türkic?

    the goat and donkey contact had you in our chronicles:D we liked horses:D

  • @gogoasacenusie

    we have not asian genetic markers :) kazakstanians have european, uyghurs too. europeans on horses migrated to asia, and back home to eu as kurgan culture, scythans, sarmatians, huns, avars, maygars, uzes, cumans, tatars.

    the joined elements were asians yes in 24% in ancient magyar tombs, but only in the ruler tombs, what means this? it means 50 000 mongoloids in europid sea. who didnt speake in magyar. you have 25% jewish markers were from?

  • The Huns were Turks. So stop talking nonsense. Meaning of Turks: Kazak Uzbek Kirgiz Azeri Turk (Turkey) Turkmen North Cyprus and tataristan, Uygur etc. ... I am a Turk who knows his history. Proud of being Turk I would do anything to merge the country Turks
  • @ThePhilosophie1 The Huns were not Turks, The turks are subject conquered people to the Ottoman empire. The Huns are the ancestors of the Magyars. They came from the slopes of the Ural mountains, and from history itself. Sorry But Turks cant claim to be related Huns that is for sure.

  • @tisoy909 If you said that the Turks conquered people are subjected to the Ottoman Empire. Then explain me if the empire Göktürk (empire of Central Asia) is a Turkish empire or not.

    Westerners know nothing about the history of us ...

    except Western historians ...

    discuss with them before saying anything

    Sincerely Thephilosophie1

  • I am proud of as a TURK because my ancestors are reason of the Great Chinese Wall !! :)

  • It's so funny to see all these Turks claim him. Huns were not a race, they were a federation of many ethnic groups. Huns could be Mongol, Hungarians, Slavs, Germans, Celts, everything.

  • thedogrukonus @ You are right. The Huns, the Avars, and Hungarians are TURK. These are the Turanian peoples (or Iranian). The Turkish belongs to the family of Turkic peoples.

  • bachka1 @ Attila was not Turkish, but not Mongolian. However, the Huns, the Avars and Hungarians are direct relatives. Turks are also part of the allied nations (if you interpret it, you're right: Attila came from a nation with which the Turks also cared for relatives)... The Hungarians are grandchildren of Attila, the Turks are their cousins ... if you know... :)

  • You should have a lot to learn in order to find out that you're arguing about Attila. Your comments based on a Zionist rabble-tales. Attila was black hun (ie western)The western Huns belong to the Turanian. Read up, it would be helpful. The Ural-Altaic languages are divided into 3 main branches: 1. Finno-Ugric/Finn, Estonian, Latvian, Lithuanian. 2.Turkic-Mongol /Turkish, Mongolian, Kazakh, Kyrgyz, etc). The Turanian-Iranian... may be that it hurts you, there Hungarian are a Turanian people.

  • Ok if turks were huns then who are the people of Hungary? Attila's hun state is only one part of HUNs wh moved to ther west.

  • Huns are Turks.

  • Saying Huns as only Turks is absolutely wrong. They were Mongolian. and may be..i am saying may be Turks (with little hope)..There is no proof of this..Huns divided into several parts.

  • @boohoi9 huns and attila were turkic, not mongolian, go do your research properly.

  • @AntiKyrgyz

    Of course! Everything that Hungary should be deleted from history?

    Fuck your mother!

  • @adamooodb r u mentally ill? fuck mongolians

  • @AntiKyrgyz Some hun congregations were mongolian .

  • barbarian or not they fucked everybody out

  • HUNS ARE ALSO TURKS 

  • @superhornet69

    damn.. where are you from superhornet?

  • no wonder Hitler did so much by playing one Race against another. Deep down inside we all think we are (extra) special. An outsider confirmation of this sounds only divine to our ears.

  • In Attila age, the huns known the ancient languge and they could make a big alliance with many nations (gemans, vikings etc) becouse of this. They wanted unify europe and west asia. Nowdays "thanks to this" the west europeans present him like a barbarian. They don't know the history and anything. They were ritch and upper classes with the strongest cavalry army of the world. Mongolians not huns. Anybody can check the ancient mummies in central asia here on youtube. Long life to Hungary!

  • I'm so proud of being a Turk, descendant of the Scourge of God!

  • Modern people of mongolia have nothing to do with ATTILA THE KHAN. The people who are related to Attila are magyers in Hungary, western Turks,khazaars turks, and some kypchak turks from magyer tribe in kazakhstan. The mongolians in mongolia, are tungusic, chinese, and manchurian who carry 03 and c3 haplogroup.

  • @AntiKyrgyz sounds rational

  • Best Lovely Greetings from TURKs to our cousins Hungarians. You are the grandsons of Attila the Hun TURK. Don't Forget please your identity after you join to fucking EU. You are our brothers, we have the same roots, ancestors and older history then Europeans. You are in our hearts. We like you really. Long live Ural & Altaic Turanians, great Attila (turkish Atilla), all our Grandfather!..

  • @muratti05 thanks

  • i thought it was a music video wow

  • ATTILLA is the straight ancestor of kazakhs. We still have tribes which names are HUNs here. Fuck off who doesn't know the historyю My father is a descendant of a Genghis khan and my mother is a descendant of attilla's tribe. Kazakhs and other turk nations are gratest warriors in the world.

  • @reket777pvl cenghis khan carried haplogroup C3, he killed millions of Turkmens dumb fuck, C3 is an ethnic east asian mongolian bloodline found in non turkic mongolians today. If you carry c3 bloodline, FUCK OFF U don't have anything to do with Attila, chinese looking ugly modern kazak fucks.

  • @AntiKyrgyz

    Why your nick is antikygrgyz ? Why not anti Rus ? Russia had assimilated hundreds of thousands tatars in last 100 years.

  • huns came from mongol asia and settled in hungary us turks also came from mongol asia but settled in turkey therefore hungarians and turks come from the same seed just like tatars uighurs and all the turkic peoples

  • Freedoom of Turk nations...