Thus, the universal vehicle will contains: 1).-the body strenght frame; 2).-the thermonuclear controlled reactor; 3).-coolling devices; 4).-reactive electromagnetic motors for drive force and for orientation. At this vehicle, with the steering-wheel or separate commands aid, we direct motors' traction force on any displacement way. The possibilitiys of adaptation and using such vehicles are unlimited in any domain: transport, energy, mining, agriculture,building, dwellings...
The magnetic field produced by superconductor coil, is transformed in electromagnetic field which can evolve in space and will produce the reaction force. The superconductive coil will be supplyed with permanet current at 35...40 kV. This motor is an antigravitational motor, but this will constitute the principal device- indispensable -in the realization the magnetic trap for the thermonuclear controlled reactor!
The reactive electromagnetic motor isn't one invention, it is 100% impression of one part from the schema in the tomb stone from Palenque; which is not sculptured or carved, but is pressed in one die, and mean that it was not performed of the primitive man! The motor has: superconductor coil for magnetic field producing; magnetic nozzles, magnetic circuits for variation of magnetic permeability; dielectric rings for changing electric permitivity.
Mikhael angel showed him thermonuclear controlled reactor namely:"And my spirit hasbeen hiden and me Enoh saw the light of those core.Something as an ice stones house arisen and among ice pieces hadbeen alive fire flames.And my spirit beheld a circle which surround with fire that house from its fourth corner to these alive fire rivers which had enclosed the house.And around it they hadbeen seraphs, cherubs and ophamins, these are eternally awake and watch over the glory(ship)"
Heavenly vehicles with thermonuclear controlled reactor were made and exist of thousands years ago.Nikola Tesla was not mad and the Holy Scriptures deceive not. In the Hebrew apocryphal "Jubilees book" it says about patriarch Enoh that he was with God's angels 7 jubilees(49 years) and they, from a great heavenly ship's board showed him all what exist on Earth and in Skys, this now over 4300 years.
I had thinked a proposal of realisation to one universal vehicle, good on Earth but and in cosmos. The source of energy is a thermonuclear controlled reactor, and the traction is realized through a set of reactive electromagnetic motors. The realization of these, impose a revision and elucidation to some parts from the actual science, which is strangled of the theoretical physics with a series of metaphysical laws and principles.
The presenter of theoretical physics and scientific-fantastical scenarious know not that in the Holy Scriptures is speak about the heavenly world and about heavenly ships. The Jews od 2000...3500 years ago named them: pear of fire, the cloud, glory of the God, angel, fire cart, fire whirl, a.s.o. In Iezechil's book it describes the appearance, the landing and the starting of a big cosmical vehicles. Iezechil describes the landing train as a four alive creatures group.
In present we try different vehicles in every medium(submarine, ships, motor cars, trains, airplanes and rockets), and they don't express an optimum garantee neiter for present nor for future. I follow of 50 years the realization of the russians and americans the penetration of the man in cosmos, but the realised progress is not good and sure, but very expensive, very heavy and dangerous.
Americans built two multi million dollar crawlers to move their rockets around, with clever leveling equipment and stuff. Ruissans put the rocket on the side and pulled it along on a railroad with a regular diesel locomotive.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxx xxx xxx xxx advertising for {rocket launch (advert) } xxx so please go on it and comment and rate xxx xxx xxx xxx xxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
don't think about Kazakhstan as it showed in movie Borat.. people, especially americans open your eyes and look to the country on the other hand. Nowadays Kazakhstan is one of the developed, rich and big country in the world.. think a bit , the true fact is more important than the fun in movie... search more videos about Kazakhstan, read more about it and only know about it, please...
in 1820 a man named fredrick osloft one day he was working in his lab until a ghost came by and killed him the next morning fredrick was nowhere to be seen 100 years later two boys went in the lab as a dare the boys where never seen again where aparently murdered now that u have read this comment tonight when u go to sleep the two boys and fredrick will come and murder you but you can stop this by posting this comment on 5 other videos by midnight im sorry i relly hate these things :'(
Так уж случилось,что после развала Байк-р остался в ведении КЗ.Никто не спорит о заслугах России.К сожалению у КЗ нет лишнего капитала и науч.разработок для развития собственной косм.программы.Поэтому за него и не держатся,а сдают в долговременную аренду России на взаимовыгодных условиях.Благодаря действующему космодрому у местного населения есть работа.Ну а если все довольны,чё лаетесь?Процветания,мира и здоровья всем россиянам и казахстанцам!!)))Вот о чём думать надо,а не цепляться к словам))!
Я сам служил срочку на байконуре...На 45й площадке...Строили коммерческий старт.Если не ошибаюсь он сейчас функционирует.Эх давно это было...Ковёр тюльпанов в мае...это надо видеть!
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
I had thinked a proposal of realisation to one universal vehicle, good on Earth but and in cosmos. The source of energy is a thermonuclear controlled reactor, and the traction is realized through a set of reactive electromagnetic motors. The realization of these, impose a revision and elucidation to some parts from the actual science, which is strangled of the theoretical physics with a series of metaphysical laws and principles.
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
This will be our only means of getting to the ISS in the next bunch of years. The Space Shuttle program will be over soon, Orion has years of development ahead. While Soyuz program has been in service for half a century and nothing will stop it. Because it is being improved steadily.
The American space program may be impressive, but the Russian one is less risky and more stable.
@WolfishFish Эээ, они и сейчас братья-казахи, отличные парни.Уважаю их, респект и уважуха, НО, при всём уважении к ним - Байконур не космодром Казахстана.Это космодром, построенный в СССР и в данный момент его может обслуживать только Россия.
@WolfishFish у Казахстана не может быть подобной космической программы, так как она будет съедать 20 - 30% от ВВП страны.
а Россия сейчас поддерживает два космодрома и строит третий...
Да и по крайней мере думаю, никто бы не будет в будущем против если Казахи будут запускать свои спутники с наших космодромов, если это конечно понадобиться
всё зависит от темпов роста экономики. =) Казахам дорога в космос заказана. не помню точно где, но это в Южной Америке.. какая то из небольших стран, начала давать в аренду место для строительства космодромов...
Там точка наиболее выгодная... нужно меньше топлива и тд... особенности планеты..
там можно сказать .строится международный космический порт..
Hey you fucker shut the fuck up!!!! baikonur iz in Kazakhstan and it belongs to our goverment!!! Stop this misleading information!!! Check the map and see it with your eyes!!! Stupid bitch go learn some geography!!!
Gee the Russians are getting cocky again, maybe they have forgotten they lost the cold war. Guess they have been a backwater country for the last 30 years, they need a bit of hope
@TheTranceSeeker but i know what you mean anyway its not even because of the usa that they lost they lost because of the fall of the berlin wall wich was the main thing that started a domino puzzle that ulminated in gorbatchev bringing dwn the ussr, it was a lapsus that german leader said that east berlin could visit west berlin but he forgot to say how long and beding bedang the wall fold and we know the rest
@TheTranceSeeker Sorry I didnt relise that the Soviet Union won the Cold War, must have been the colapse of the goverment, the ruple and everything else that makes a country stable that led me to think ohterwise. Again I apoligise,yep Russia has really been a becon of civilisation in the last 30 years.
@dodoslovensko ahahha.....if this is "OLD" why then USA use russians for complicated launchs? And dont say i lie, goto RIA novosti and watch videos where USA crew landed with russian mates.
I think one of the reasons Russia has such ease with technology is cause they have the biggest playground on earth. So much landscape that no one cares about where they can just try out everything without anyone being bothered.
Did you see the soldier walking with his machine gun in front of the rocket. He's going to protect the rocket!! From what I don't know. Obvious symbolism over substance. Americans don't do these silly things.
I'm so thankful for your encyclopedic knowledge about the security arrangements at the Baikonur Cosmodrome and can enlighten us all with your limitless wisdom.
@interceptor256 ... actually, with our high tech weapons we have reduced collateral damage (civilian deaths) to the lowest level in any war ever waged on our planet. You could almost say that we have made war much more humane. If the enemy chooses to position themselves amongst civilians then we cannot be held responsible for civilian deaths. You should also know that I am against war.
@Pseudologic Oh yea like you know all there is to know about UAV missiles and predators you have no idea unless you have actually been there and have worked with this technology.
@XxReNaGaDexX1 I speak from news articles, which clearly state that the ratio is about 20 civilians to 1 bad guy. So I know I rely on integrity of those articles, but then US Army never challenges them so they must be true. My statement does not require me to have some special knowledge about UAV other than what I already have.
@Hannsfeld It's not classified information that UAVs kill more civilians than terrorists. In fact, the US Army acknowledges that it's true. I'm not sure what you're trying to prove here.
Well, lets see. Let's take your idea that "because news people say stuff and the military doesn't refute it makes it true" and let's say that it's an "asinine statement", because it is. I didn't say a damn thing about UAV's or anything else.
The "classified" part is called "sarcasm in order to make the point". The military let's that "look, it's a UFO" stuff go on when often it's military aircraft. It's not their job to correct the news stories, unless in their own interest.
Are you dense or what? I just stated twice that my issue is with your silly statement about the military not refuting things making them true. It was ridiculous.
Why now do you now feel the need to draw me into an argument about UAV's? Did you see any reference to UAV's in anything I previously typed, other than telling you I didn't previously say anything about UAV's?
Here's an even better question: What does any of this have to do with the video above?
@Hannsfeld Your statement was that lack of denial from the army doesn't mean that it's true. I said that yes it does, since it's not black ops missions, but are established occurrences knowingly carried out by the US Army. And a false accusation from a reputable paper would result in a denial from the Army. Now, following your logic, if the Army never released a statement about going to Iraq then we can't assume that its the US Army in Iraq, which is totally idiotic.
I stated that the military "not denying" something does not constitute evidence for it being true. Have you ever heard the response "no comment"?
The second statement about the idea that if the Army doesn't release a news story saying they are in Iraq means they aren't over there is so foolish I shouldn't have to point it out at all.
Don't tell me what "my logic" is Skippy. You are straw-manning me. Trying to wriggle out of one foolish statement, you are making more and more.
@Hannsfeld And I never stated that everything that the military doesn't not deny is therefore truth. You took a specific comment out of context and started telling me how wrong I am. Who's "strawmanning" who?
Just had to spew that last little bit of fecal matter didn't you? Can't leave well enough alone?
Your channel lists you as working in "finance" in Canada, and that you are from Russia (which explains why your panties are in a bunch about US UAV's). What makes you an "expert" on anything you are talking about?
Maybe if they need to order a spare tire for a UAV, you can tell them how much it will cost with local tax.
@Hannsfeld OK, so you're not mad about me not being correct on facts, you're just plainly mad because I criticized your army, of which you were a part of. Now I get it. I bruised your ego so you went on lunatic tirade... It doesn't surprise me, confidence in short supply in the US Army, aside from the brainwashed gungho infantile type of confidence they try to instill in you along with hate for anything not American.
You are barking up the wrong tree Skippy. I don't give two shakes about you "criticizing the army", but look at you projecting big time. I can tell from your posts to myself and others here that you have some kind of "Russian Inferiority Complex" which is the real driving force behind your comments, isn't it? I didn't say I hated anyone or anything, I just criticized your original silly comment so now I am on a supposed "lunatic tirade".
By the way, YES my issue with you is that you are asserting things based on silly arguments. However you are desperate to drag me into a "my country is better than yours" argument instead of admitting that your original statement about "things not being refuted makes them true" is a silly fallacious argument. That was what my comments were always about. You have skirted around it at every turn, and as a result we are now on day 2 of a BS pissing contest.
Oh, and tag you're it. Let's keep the ad hominem BS going since it allows you skirt the original issue.
Read my lips: "The lack of refutation of a news story does not constitute evidence of said story being true." It was a silly statement. I am not interested in engaging you on any of your other BS, and never was.
@Hannsfeld Now you're going to analyse my argument for fallacies? Is that a skill you learned at Atheist U? Haha, you sure do a lot of Ad Hominem for someone who pretends to be rationalist. My UAV statement had nothing to do with county of my origin or residence, and I would, unlike you, voice them if I was born in the US. Now go play with your Star Trek collectibles, I'm done here.
Go back and read the posts. How many times have I attempted to steer you back to the original point? I pointed out a silly statement of yours, and this is the result - "Star Trek Collectibles". Why? Because you can't admit to making a silly comment.
And you still haven't answered it. Big surprise. Why don't you dig through my channel and see if you can find anything else to spout off about? Then we can drone on about everything other than the original issue.
When someone asks for a source for something you are asserting, it is traditional to refer to a specific relevant document, not your favorite news outlets.
Don't bother elaborating on this however, as I can see that the answer is generally "I saw it in the news" rather than something more impressive like "I am a military UAV specialist", or "I work in military intelligence".
I think your screen name is most apt, unfortunately.
@ybnvs2 "Did you see the soldier walking with his machine gun in front of the rocket." -- They may call it Cosmodrome, but Baikonur was and still is a military proving ground, hence it is run by military by military rules.
syrymflash и RealRussianPower - два выблюдка, не имеющих ничего общего ни с Россией, ни с Казахстаном. Хотя нет, одна общая черта есть - они оба нас ненавидят :)) Собаки лают - караван идет.
Comment removed
TheWarrior02Arg 1 week ago
• SandustanBrasov
Thus, the universal vehicle will contains: 1).-the body strenght frame; 2).-the thermonuclear controlled reactor; 3).-coolling devices; 4).-reactive electromagnetic motors for drive force and for orientation. At this vehicle, with the steering-wheel or separate commands aid, we direct motors' traction force on any displacement way. The possibilitiys of adaptation and using such vehicles are unlimited in any domain: transport, energy, mining, agriculture,building, dwellings...
sandustanBrasov 2 weeks ago
• SandustanBrasov
The magnetic field produced by superconductor coil, is transformed in electromagnetic field which can evolve in space and will produce the reaction force. The superconductive coil will be supplyed with permanet current at 35...40 kV. This motor is an antigravitational motor, but this will constitute the principal device- indispensable -in the realization the magnetic trap for the thermonuclear controlled reactor!
sandustanBrasov 2 weeks ago
• SandustanBrasov
The reactive electromagnetic motor isn't one invention, it is 100% impression of one part from the schema in the tomb stone from Palenque; which is not sculptured or carved, but is pressed in one die, and mean that it was not performed of the primitive man! The motor has: superconductor coil for magnetic field producing; magnetic nozzles, magnetic circuits for variation of magnetic permeability; dielectric rings for changing electric permitivity.
sandustanBrasov 2 weeks ago
• SandustanBrasov
Mikhael angel showed him thermonuclear controlled reactor namely:"And my spirit hasbeen hiden and me Enoh saw the light of those core.Something as an ice stones house arisen and among ice pieces hadbeen alive fire flames.And my spirit beheld a circle which surround with fire that house from its fourth corner to these alive fire rivers which had enclosed the house.And around it they hadbeen seraphs, cherubs and ophamins, these are eternally awake and watch over the glory(ship)"
sandustanBrasov 2 weeks ago
• SandustanBrasov
Heavenly vehicles with thermonuclear controlled reactor were made and exist of thousands years ago.Nikola Tesla was not mad and the Holy Scriptures deceive not. In the Hebrew apocryphal "Jubilees book" it says about patriarch Enoh that he was with God's angels 7 jubilees(49 years) and they, from a great heavenly ship's board showed him all what exist on Earth and in Skys, this now over 4300 years.
sandustanBrasov 2 weeks ago
• SandustanBrasov
I had thinked a proposal of realisation to one universal vehicle, good on Earth but and in cosmos. The source of energy is a thermonuclear controlled reactor, and the traction is realized through a set of reactive electromagnetic motors. The realization of these, impose a revision and elucidation to some parts from the actual science, which is strangled of the theoretical physics with a series of metaphysical laws and principles.
sandustanBrasov 2 weeks ago
SandustanBrasov
The presenter of theoretical physics and scientific-fantastical scenarious know not that in the Holy Scriptures is speak about the heavenly world and about heavenly ships. The Jews od 2000...3500 years ago named them: pear of fire, the cloud, glory of the God, angel, fire cart, fire whirl, a.s.o. In Iezechil's book it describes the appearance, the landing and the starting of a big cosmical vehicles. Iezechil describes the landing train as a four alive creatures group.
sandustanBrasov 2 weeks ago
• SandustanBrasov
In present we try different vehicles in every medium(submarine, ships, motor cars, trains, airplanes and rockets), and they don't express an optimum garantee neiter for present nor for future. I follow of 50 years the realization of the russians and americans the penetration of the man in cosmos, but the realised progress is not good and sure, but very expensive, very heavy and dangerous.
sandustanBrasov 2 weeks ago
Wait why is this still here, I thought I blew it up in black ops.
justinpeter100 1 month ago
Americans built two multi million dollar crawlers to move their rockets around, with clever leveling equipment and stuff. Ruissans put the rocket on the side and pulled it along on a railroad with a regular diesel locomotive.
Tjita1 3 months ago 8
Tjita1,
'
ussr russia building too many waste arms weapons and spending too much rubles currencys
bestamerica 1 month ago
Esses russos! Poderiam ter ganhado a corrida espacial contra os estados unidos! Mas não só investiram nessa merda de projeto Soyuz!!!
Loof47 3 months ago
I like how quickly the Soyuz is able to roll out. The shuttle was so slow it was painful to watch.
Tubeglowfun 3 months ago
Russian launch platform is fukin cool!!!!
crumcon 4 months ago
A Russian rocket with a steam engine :-)
GertJanDam 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hi, My name Borat!
maltatravel 5 months ago
Awesome!!
darinattard 6 months ago
Казахи ебаные блять
DonSNAT 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxx advertising for {rocket launch (advert) } xxx
xxx so please go on it and comment and rate xxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
rocketman0034 6 months ago
rocketman0034 6 months ago
don't think about Kazakhstan as it showed in movie Borat.. people, especially americans open your eyes and look to the country on the other hand. Nowadays Kazakhstan is one of the developed, rich and big country in the world.. think a bit , the true fact is more important than the fun in movie... search more videos about Kazakhstan, read more about it and only know about it, please...
ZaViRt 6 months ago
'
why why south korea flag on ussr russia rocket for
bestamerica 7 months ago
@bestamerica Because there was South Korean astronaut onboard the Soyuz.
Fontomovsky 7 months ago
Fontomovsky,
'
i dont like it,,,
because ussr russian commander did order the jetfighter to shot the missile and killed KAL007 down in 1983,,,
why russia do that
bestamerica 7 months ago
@bestamerica you really stupid, you know it?
Margulan89kz 7 months ago
@bestamerica next time you moan on "bloody russians", refresh your watch?v=Bl0mYbwPnFo please, hope you don't like *that* either
(aside: heh, his IQ is a signed short int 140 it seems anyways)
mshigorin 1 month ago
mshigorin,
'
no need it...
dont threat me
bestamerica 1 month ago
@bestamerica the only concept you were "threatened" is called "integer overflow" -- relax, it's not even related to splitting you in parts :)
mshigorin 1 month ago
Fontomovsky,
Because there was South Korean astronaut onboard the Soyuz.
Fontomovsky 3 weeks ago
'
south korean astronaut can come in american space shuttle,,,
no need ussr russia rocket,,,
cancelled ussr russia rocket for good,,,
bestamerica 6 months ago
@bestamerica Because there was probably a South Korean astronaunt that was part of the crew
How old are you?
AccessDenied55 6 months ago
AccessDenied55,
'
south korean astronaut can come in welcome to american space shuttle only,,,
no need ussr russia buran and rocket,,,
cancelled ussr russia buran and rocket for good
bestamerica 6 months ago
Where is Borat?
SuperMoneyBusiness 7 months ago
In Soviet Russia rockets travel on train rails.
ihaxurheadoff 7 months ago
@ihaxurheadoff
Actually, rockets travel on rails everywhere...
SSTTEEAALLTTHH 7 months ago 2
ey russian how do u say we won the cold war and space race?
iannaccone18 7 months ago
А что делает мужик с автоматом возле ракеты?
zimm4 8 months ago
In your ass
geobo11 8 months ago
Where's Borat?
CrytellGames 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
in 1820 a man named fredrick osloft one day he was working in his lab until a ghost came by and killed him the next morning fredrick was nowhere to be seen 100 years later two boys went in the lab as a dare the boys where never seen again where aparently murdered now that u have read this comment tonight when u go to sleep the two boys and fredrick will come and murder you but you can stop this by posting this comment on 5 other videos by midnight im sorry i relly hate these things :'(
lilreap3r 9 months ago
call of duty is wrong baikonur isn't for icbm
sjors00666 9 months ago
ロシア語って全角ばかりなんだ
COLOMBEtomoko 9 months ago
главно чтоб вторая ступень мне на голову не упала ЫыЫ
sergTEMIRTAU 9 months ago
@LegitimatelyBaked you are epic fuck shit
zzerDrezz 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
КРЫМ БЫЛ УКРАИНОЯЗЫЧНЫМ ДО ОКУПАЦИИ ЕГО РУССКИМИ!
youtube.com/watch?v=5eJ4mh2WC5U
MrWelder25 9 months ago
beautiful
davidlucasfer 9 months ago
я что не пойму почему казахи надо говорить Казахстанцы тут много народов живут кроме казохов
kinomanofficial 10 months ago
Так уж случилось,что после развала Байк-р остался в ведении КЗ.Никто не спорит о заслугах России.К сожалению у КЗ нет лишнего капитала и науч.разработок для развития собственной косм.программы.Поэтому за него и не держатся,а сдают в долговременную аренду России на взаимовыгодных условиях.Благодаря действующему космодрому у местного населения есть работа.Ну а если все довольны,чё лаетесь?Процветания,мира и здоровья всем россиянам и казахстанцам!!)))Вот о чём думать надо,а не цепляться к словам))!
almaty1975 10 months ago 2
Я сам служил срочку на байконуре...На 45й площадке...Строили коммерческий старт.Если не ошибаюсь он сейчас функционирует.Эх давно это было...Ковёр тюльпанов в мае...это надо видеть!
BULBASHC 10 months ago 8
@BULBASHC what?
Fry123459 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
sandustanBrasov 11 months ago
• SandustanBrasov
I had thinked a proposal of realisation to one universal vehicle, good on Earth but and in cosmos. The source of energy is a thermonuclear controlled reactor, and the traction is realized through a set of reactive electromagnetic motors. The realization of these, impose a revision and elucidation to some parts from the actual science, which is strangled of the theoretical physics with a series of metaphysical laws and principles.
sandustanBrasov 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The test for nuclear fusion realisation on Tokamak's installations and with LASER cannot bring anything new for the energetics' future. I bind the thermonuclear controlled reactor schedule by the Sun model , by the reactive electromagnetic motor schedule from Palenque stone's tombe. You see the my project for thermonuclear controlled reactor.
sandustanBrasov 11 months ago
[Орёт голосом Свинядзе]: "Сожрали миллионы! Уничтожили! Лагерная пыль! Ракет больше чем котлет на душу населения! Долой ракеты, даешь котлеты!"
Virtuon777 11 months ago
This will be our only means of getting to the ISS in the next bunch of years. The Space Shuttle program will be over soon, Orion has years of development ahead. While Soyuz program has been in service for half a century and nothing will stop it. Because it is being improved steadily.
The American space program may be impressive, but the Russian one is less risky and more stable.
meteor4163 11 months ago
Что-то не понял, что творится в комментах.Казахи убеждают, что Байконур в Казахстане?Ну да, он там.
Только братья-казахи мало имеют отношения к этому космодрому.Примерно такое же, какое имели индейцы к кораблю Колумба.
sergeyv91 11 months ago
@sergeyv91 ty idiot. Mi odnoi stranoi bili ranshe, i poetomu nelzya skazat chto kazahi ne imeyut k etomu otnoshenia. Tupica
WolfishFish 11 months ago
@WolfishFish Эээ, они и сейчас братья-казахи, отличные парни.Уважаю их, респект и уважуха, НО, при всём уважении к ним - Байконур не космодром Казахстана.Это космодром, построенный в СССР и в данный момент его может обслуживать только Россия.
sergeyv91 11 months ago
@sergeyv91 Soglasen s tem, chto v danni moment ego mozhet obsluzhivat' tolko Rossia, tak kak ona arenduet Baikonur..
WolfishFish 11 months ago
@WolfishFish Т.е., если бы она его не арендовала, то им бы пользовался КТО?Казахстан?И что бы Казахстан запускал с него?
sergeyv91 11 months ago
@sergeyv91 vot poetomu-to Kazahstan otdal ego v arendu Rossii. Nam on poka ne nuzhen, no vse zhe kosmodrom nash
WolfishFish 11 months ago
@WolfishFish у Казахстана не может быть подобной космической программы, так как она будет съедать 20 - 30% от ВВП страны.
а Россия сейчас поддерживает два космодрома и строит третий...
Да и по крайней мере думаю, никто бы не будет в будущем против если Казахи будут запускать свои спутники с наших космодромов, если это конечно понадобиться
AlexandrGray 10 months ago
@AlexandrGray u Kazahstana mozhet bit' podobnaya programma, no ne seichas. Pridet vremya..
WolfishFish 10 months ago
@WolfishFish
В этом мало кто сомневается)
всё зависит от темпов роста экономики. =) Казахам дорога в космос заказана. не помню точно где, но это в Южной Америке.. какая то из небольших стран, начала давать в аренду место для строительства космодромов...
Там точка наиболее выгодная... нужно меньше топлива и тд... особенности планеты..
там можно сказать .строится международный космический порт..
AlexandrGray 10 months ago
@AlexandrGray
French Guyana chtoli? Tak ved' tam Francuzkoe pravitel'stvo smasterilo....
shammy63 9 months ago
@WolfishFish ругаться-то всякий жынды-батыр горазд, а? ну вот ни к чему. :]
mshigorin 1 month ago
zombies in that place that actually they used again(sereous they where zombies there in 1964!)
PVTCobayo360 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
here I see so many jealous americans :)
Hookis69 1 year ago
they need 2 towers to stabilize their poorly engineered rocket. how sad :(
phantom1000A 1 year ago
wow.. we use a huge conveyer/roller/wheel system to haul our space shuttle.. they use a locomotive lol.. how originaLLy thought..
11AMERICANO11 1 year ago
Superb engineering as usual! Very nice. Maybe in my lifetime I can see one lift off in person.
themainproblem 1 year ago
Hey you fucker shut the fuck up!!!! baikonur iz in Kazakhstan and it belongs to our goverment!!! Stop this misleading information!!! Check the map and see it with your eyes!!! Stupid bitch go learn some geography!!!
AlikVan 1 year ago
That locomotive looks like a Russian version of an ALCO RS-3.
htc6600 1 year ago
Э! Пошёл в ЖОПУ ! Байконур в Казахстане, а не в России! Географию учи, а не пизди!
holydaytime82 1 year ago
The Russian cosmodrome Baikonur is in Russia, not in the "Kazakhstan".
SergeiPilipenko 1 year ago
@SergeiPilipenko It is in Kazakhstan, it's in the desert steppes of Kazakhstan.
MajesticElusiveness 1 year ago
@MajesticElusiveness
No, the Russian and the world wide first cosmodrome Baikonur is in Russia, in the Syrdaria province of Russia.
SergeiPilipenko 1 year ago
@SergeiPilipenko Bleh, whatever. It's still Kazakh, with the Russian renting it.
MajesticElusiveness 1 year ago
@MajesticElusiveness
The Russian cosmodrome Baikonur is still occupied by the separatists, but it is temporarily, while the Moscow Kremlin is occupied the traitors.
SergeiPilipenko 1 year ago
@SergeiPilipenko пошел нахуй!россия снимает этот космодром если ты не в курсе!так что не пизди если не знаешь!
mlp9312 1 year ago
@mlp9312
Приличные страны свои собственные космодромы не «снимают», тем более у какого-то незаконнорожденного «Казахстана».
SergeiPilipenko 1 year ago
@SergeiPilipenko хочешь сказать казахстан не приличный?а твоя россия матушка приличная?
mlp9312 1 year ago
@SergeiPilipenko вроде русский, а такой бред несешь, еврейская у тебя логика.
Acidrobosapiens 1 year ago
do they use the same launchpad for soyuz that they used for the early r-7
Gahman900 1 year ago
You guys are all fags. Nuff said :D
EpiDemic117 1 year ago
Where's Borat?
ezayinthahood 1 year ago
@ezayinthahood Посмотри у себя у жопе...
vallerinos 1 year ago
@ezayinthahood Borat??Borat is not present in Kazakhstan! so stupid
mlp9312 1 year ago
How about we all shut the fuck up and watch the rocket.
Maxables 1 year ago
@Maxables Finally someone with more than one neuron!
NorseCrusader 1 year ago
Gee the Russians are getting cocky again, maybe they have forgotten they lost the cold war. Guess they have been a backwater country for the last 30 years, they need a bit of hope
dx80cruiser 1 year ago
@dx80cruiser haha lost the cold war?
Its the americans that lost in Vietnam, Korea etc
get your facts straight, son.
TheTranceSeeker 1 year ago
@TheTranceSeeker yeah but what happened to usa cold war nemesis ussr... get your fact strait they might have lost a battle but they won the war
xaviourte 1 year ago
@TheTranceSeeker but i know what you mean anyway its not even because of the usa that they lost they lost because of the fall of the berlin wall wich was the main thing that started a domino puzzle that ulminated in gorbatchev bringing dwn the ussr, it was a lapsus that german leader said that east berlin could visit west berlin but he forgot to say how long and beding bedang the wall fold and we know the rest
xaviourte 1 year ago
@TheTranceSeeker Sorry I didnt relise that the Soviet Union won the Cold War, must have been the colapse of the goverment, the ruple and everything else that makes a country stable that led me to think ohterwise. Again I apoligise,yep Russia has really been a becon of civilisation in the last 30 years.
dx80cruiser 1 year ago
@dx80cruiser You are so pathetic haha )))
iams0seri0us 1 year ago
is this the same ,,,design,,,, that put gagarin into space?
dodoslovensko 1 year ago
@dodoslovensko ahahha.....if this is "OLD" why then USA use russians for complicated launchs? And dont say i lie, goto RIA novosti and watch videos where USA crew landed with russian mates.
nedeljko031 1 year ago
@nedeljko031 you replied to the wrong guy.
all i was asking if this is the same ,,model,, that put gagarin into orbit.
is it? cuz it looks like vostok to mee. [iam no expert thou.]
dodoslovensko 1 year ago
@dodoslovensko Dam...wrong man... xD Hm...last Vostok was used in 1991...this is...it should be..something newer :D
nedeljko031 1 year ago
borat is in there :P
asshatnowhere159 1 year ago
@asshatnowhere159 no, borat is fucking your slutty mother
ibragimKAZ 1 year ago
@ibragimKAZ oh i feel so insulted. specially when it comes from some one over youtube.
asshatnowhere159 1 year ago
@asshatnowhere159 ok sorry dude! i understood that u r dumbass! :D
borat - anything else?
ibragimKAZ 1 year ago
@ibragimKAZ no not really. cool rocket btw.
asshatnowhere159 1 year ago
@ibragimKAZ fuck Borat! that guys is a british jew who filmed gypsies in ROmania and mixed languages in teh movie. so retarded, fuck that shit!
378maksim 1 year ago
@ 0:20 the guy wishes his dick was as big as that huge rocket thing rolling out
kalinga01 1 year ago
I think one of the reasons Russia has such ease with technology is cause they have the biggest playground on earth. So much landscape that no one cares about where they can just try out everything without anyone being bothered.
InSaneTK 1 year ago
@InSaneTK Or it's maybe because they invested in space technology. You people still have a problem admitting that Russians can be smarter than you.
Pseudologic 1 year ago 4
vamo las puuuuuuuuuta
runnerfree 1 year ago
Russian designed spacecraft are by far the best and coolest looking ever!
themainproblem 1 year ago
was borat on it?!?!
thoraxxx2 1 year ago
how many years have passed and vostok 1 and sojuz still runing. this is what they calling reliability
6opyt 1 year ago
cccp power
grasess 1 year ago 5
Comment removed
1huppez 1 year ago
Ruskies have the coolest looking gantries. Very robo-tech in design. It makes the whole process look that much more cooler.
starstarstar42 1 year ago 9
well, man, it just looks like that. In reality gantries are of very poor quality and very very old design.
askarbek88 1 year ago
NO COMMENT?
BovrilKetchup 2 years ago 3
russian engineers are the best
23580578H 2 years ago 28
Among the best. Yes.
MastaMag 2 years ago 2
Did you see the soldier walking with his machine gun in front of the rocket. He's going to protect the rocket!! From what I don't know. Obvious symbolism over substance. Americans don't do these silly things.
ybnvs2 1 year ago 3
I'm so thankful for your encyclopedic knowledge about the security arrangements at the Baikonur Cosmodrome and can enlighten us all with your limitless wisdom.
chokedad 1 year ago 4
I am a master at stating the obvious.
ybnvs2 1 year ago 2
lol yes you do, your whole country is mad for it.
TheREALSisko 1 year ago
@ybnvs2 yeah americans rather bomb whole cities
interceptor256 1 year ago
@interceptor256 ... actually, with our high tech weapons we have reduced collateral damage (civilian deaths) to the lowest level in any war ever waged on our planet. You could almost say that we have made war much more humane. If the enemy chooses to position themselves amongst civilians then we cannot be held responsible for civilian deaths. You should also know that I am against war.
ybnvs2 1 year ago
@ybnvs2 You probably mean those UAV missiles that kill 1 bad guy and 20 civilians.
Pseudologic 1 year ago
@Pseudologic Oh yea like you know all there is to know about UAV missiles and predators you have no idea unless you have actually been there and have worked with this technology.
XxReNaGaDexX1 1 year ago
@XxReNaGaDexX1 I speak from news articles, which clearly state that the ratio is about 20 civilians to 1 bad guy. So I know I rely on integrity of those articles, but then US Army never challenges them so they must be true. My statement does not require me to have some special knowledge about UAV other than what I already have.
Pseudologic 1 year ago
@Pseudologic
"US Army doesn't challenge something, so it must be true"
LMFAO!! It's not the US Army's job to supply you with classified information!
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@Hannsfeld It's not classified information that UAVs kill more civilians than terrorists. In fact, the US Army acknowledges that it's true. I'm not sure what you're trying to prove here.
Pseudologic 1 year ago
@Pseudologic
Well, lets see. Let's take your idea that "because news people say stuff and the military doesn't refute it makes it true" and let's say that it's an "asinine statement", because it is. I didn't say a damn thing about UAV's or anything else.
The "classified" part is called "sarcasm in order to make the point". The military let's that "look, it's a UFO" stuff go on when often it's military aircraft. It's not their job to correct the news stories, unless in their own interest.
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@Hannsfeld So you don't believe there are drone strikes in Pakistan? Or if there are they're not American?
Pseudologic 1 year ago
@Pseudologic
Are you dense or what? I just stated twice that my issue is with your silly statement about the military not refuting things making them true. It was ridiculous.
Why now do you now feel the need to draw me into an argument about UAV's? Did you see any reference to UAV's in anything I previously typed, other than telling you I didn't previously say anything about UAV's?
Here's an even better question: What does any of this have to do with the video above?
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@Hannsfeld Your statement was that lack of denial from the army doesn't mean that it's true. I said that yes it does, since it's not black ops missions, but are established occurrences knowingly carried out by the US Army. And a false accusation from a reputable paper would result in a denial from the Army. Now, following your logic, if the Army never released a statement about going to Iraq then we can't assume that its the US Army in Iraq, which is totally idiotic.
Pseudologic 1 year ago
@Pseudologic
I stated that the military "not denying" something does not constitute evidence for it being true. Have you ever heard the response "no comment"?
The second statement about the idea that if the Army doesn't release a news story saying they are in Iraq means they aren't over there is so foolish I shouldn't have to point it out at all.
Don't tell me what "my logic" is Skippy. You are straw-manning me. Trying to wriggle out of one foolish statement, you are making more and more.
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@Hannsfeld And I never stated that everything that the military doesn't not deny is therefore truth. You took a specific comment out of context and started telling me how wrong I am. Who's "strawmanning" who?
Pseudologic 1 year ago
@Pseudologic
Will you move on already? Just have to keep digging the hole deeper and deeper don't you?
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@Hannsfeld Take your own advice right after you free your anal cavity of your head.
Pseudologic 1 year ago
@Pseudologic
Just had to spew that last little bit of fecal matter didn't you? Can't leave well enough alone?
Your channel lists you as working in "finance" in Canada, and that you are from Russia (which explains why your panties are in a bunch about US UAV's). What makes you an "expert" on anything you are talking about?
Maybe if they need to order a spare tire for a UAV, you can tell them how much it will cost with local tax.
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@Hannsfeld OK, so you're not mad about me not being correct on facts, you're just plainly mad because I criticized your army, of which you were a part of. Now I get it. I bruised your ego so you went on lunatic tirade... It doesn't surprise me, confidence in short supply in the US Army, aside from the brainwashed gungho infantile type of confidence they try to instill in you along with hate for anything not American.
Pseudologic 1 year ago
@Pseudologic
You are barking up the wrong tree Skippy. I don't give two shakes about you "criticizing the army", but look at you projecting big time. I can tell from your posts to myself and others here that you have some kind of "Russian Inferiority Complex" which is the real driving force behind your comments, isn't it? I didn't say I hated anyone or anything, I just criticized your original silly comment so now I am on a supposed "lunatic tirade".
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@Pseudologic
(continued)
By the way, YES my issue with you is that you are asserting things based on silly arguments. However you are desperate to drag me into a "my country is better than yours" argument instead of admitting that your original statement about "things not being refuted makes them true" is a silly fallacious argument. That was what my comments were always about. You have skirted around it at every turn, and as a result we are now on day 2 of a BS pissing contest.
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@Pseudologic
Oh, and tag you're it. Let's keep the ad hominem BS going since it allows you skirt the original issue.
Read my lips: "The lack of refutation of a news story does not constitute evidence of said story being true." It was a silly statement. I am not interested in engaging you on any of your other BS, and never was.
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@Hannsfeld Now you're going to analyse my argument for fallacies? Is that a skill you learned at Atheist U? Haha, you sure do a lot of Ad Hominem for someone who pretends to be rationalist. My UAV statement had nothing to do with county of my origin or residence, and I would, unlike you, voice them if I was born in the US. Now go play with your Star Trek collectibles, I'm done here.
Pseudologic 1 year ago
@Pseudologic
Go back and read the posts. How many times have I attempted to steer you back to the original point? I pointed out a silly statement of yours, and this is the result - "Star Trek Collectibles". Why? Because you can't admit to making a silly comment.
And you still haven't answered it. Big surprise. Why don't you dig through my channel and see if you can find anything else to spout off about? Then we can drone on about everything other than the original issue.
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@Pseudologic
By the way, I wasn't in the Army, Einstein. I was in the Air Force.
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@Pseudologic
By the way, what is your source of information for all this "vast knowledge" about UAV's?
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@Hannsfeld All the disreputable weirdo news organizations, you know, like BBC, AP, Washington Times, The New York times and the UN.
Pseudologic 1 year ago
@Pseudologic
When someone asks for a source for something you are asserting, it is traditional to refer to a specific relevant document, not your favorite news outlets.
Don't bother elaborating on this however, as I can see that the answer is generally "I saw it in the news" rather than something more impressive like "I am a military UAV specialist", or "I work in military intelligence".
I think your screen name is most apt, unfortunately.
Hannsfeld 1 year ago
@ybnvs2 "Did you see the soldier walking with his machine gun in front of the rocket." -- They may call it Cosmodrome, but Baikonur was and still is a military proving ground, hence it is run by military by military rules.
LeadHammer 1 year ago
@23580578H swedish are damn good too.
projectloki 1 year ago
@23580578H They are superb engineers. No fluff but all practical and efficient. Nicely done.
themainproblem 1 year ago
syrymflash и RealRussianPower - два выблюдка, не имеющих ничего общего ни с Россией, ни с Казахстаном. Хотя нет, одна общая черта есть - они оба нас ненавидят :)) Собаки лают - караван идет.
MrSarMax 2 years ago 29
Agree
adrastea99 2 years ago
Точно
wozzup08 2 years ago
@MrSarMax согласен! я сам русский из Казахстана.
СЛАВА РОССИИ!!! АЛГА КАЗАКСТАН!!!
378maksim 1 year ago 19
ххахахахх...а я негр из антарктиды...
AlexQwedra 9 months ago
@AlexQwedra закалённый типа негр,да?
378maksim 9 months ago
chido camaradas
aquino1320 2 years ago
ready for battle
forugh 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
fuck u Russian bitch !!!
Kazakhstan is either independent country or will belong to USA
syrymflash 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you kazakh idiots we can rule you again
fuck off now
RealRussianPower 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i'm sure u russian bitch and people like u are gonna suck our dicks u dumbfucks.
syrymflash 2 years ago
@RealRussianPower - под фальш аккаунтом. В жопу его! Это история двух родных гос-в. Не место здесь турецкому засланцу! За*бали уже дармоеды
Vimpel969 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
vlad5548 2 years ago
we will get kazakystan back
RealRussianPower 2 years ago
sounds like a fight over a street corner. typical. u have no ideas.
forugh 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You will get my dick through your ass deep!
tolkaty 2 years ago
Computer.
heound 2 years ago
Cromag learn english before you start abusing ppl on youtube. Your comments make you seem somewhat retarded.
SgtSAWblade 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
learn how to fuck your mother , you look like an animal dick sicker
cromag30 2 years ago
touche
SgtSAWblade 2 years ago
touch the your mother pussy
cromag30 2 years ago
thats russian lol ?
WoLvY24 2 years ago