Obama really should have been the Democratic Reagan, but he hasn't been, has he? He's been pretty ineffectual.
I like the question of whether Stewart would vote for a Republican in the right scenario, and I wonder if O'Reilly would be open-minded enough to vote for a Democrat in the right scenario.
While I don't have beef with Obama, this made so much sense to me! No, he didn't live up to my expectations, but maybe they were too high? This is the proper way to say "I'm disappointed."
This is great! I watched this same bit cut with a democrat view ...How dumbass is this shit journalism in the first place?... How about showing the whole thing, and let people make up their own minds?
@szeilea I'm not even american yet I still believe I have more understanding of how your political system works, than a lot of ethnic americans. I do not claim to know it all, but you dont have to be a genius to see that Bill O'Reilly fails to reach logical conclusions and that he stirrs up a lot of hate over petty things. Jon Stewart always gives the more logical and reasonable answer, not like the overpatriotic-christian value-paranoid bullcrap that Bill spews out from time to time. Yeah?
@Kyalaen look, O'Reilly might be short-tempered and radical, but the man tells the facts. This country was founded on the Christian faith and we need to keep it that way, liberals are tearing that apart and that's what scares me.
@szeilea you essentially just said, that the only faith that is acceptable in the U.S. is Christianity. The country was founded upon democratic values and a secular view about how to mediate power with checks and balances to prevent from despots in office. Dude. are you really going to say that a country was founded on a religion? does the constitution, anywhere, dictate that the Christian faith must be upheld? do a fact check on Fox's bullshit before you attack others for telling the truth
@axe251 first off, you're not even american so you dont even have valid points to argue because you have no true idea what you're talking about (no offense). you clearly haven't heard our pledge of allegience, seen our money, read constitution, or anything. You have no idea. The founding fathers were all great christian men and to say otherwise is completely ignorant
@szeilea really? ur going to claim I'm "unamerican" just because I support religious diversity, as the U.S. does? Sure the founding fathers were Christian, and religion does percolate into aspects of America, but the constitution was founded upon checks and balances on government, not christianity. Compromise, protection of the classes as shown by Jefferson. Though Christianity is undoubtedly the majority, one should not discount the myriad of diversity represented in "American Religion."
I honestly think they could do a daily show together and become a legendary talk show, topping Lettermen, Leno, O'brien, 60 Mins....everything. I would imagine the ratings would be higher than anything else on tv.... Like a REAL Hannity and combes.
this is the exact way every democrat is, they can sit there and trash republicans to no end, not know what they expect from their candidate or party, then when they have to explain what they want for a political candidate mummer and stutter step out a sentence that makes no sense whatsoever.
Not sure I missed any irony in your statement or not. Bill seems to be the most presumptious of the two, and seems to sit firmly in his own secular beliefs whereas Jon seems more open minded and tends to consider each issue differently. Bill inferring that Jon's criticism is merely a left or right issue is both ignorant and besides the point, when really you should judge any candidate by merit, be it a democratic president or Republican letting the American people down.
2:00 I like the way O'Riely says 'thats not nice' you can tell he is thinking he wants to say 'thats not right' but can't bring himself to. Ironcially 'thants not nice' is the more accurate statement.
Gotta love those ADHD cuts to clips of stewart disrupting the interview, not to mention generally choppy editing. What sort of attention span does Fox cater to?
I'm getting sick and tired of hearing clips with stupid assholes trying to compare Obama to JFK... no, you media whores; that is an insult to President Kennedy and everything he did for us, and his sacrifice. Obama is a cheap whore. There is no comparison.
I love how Bill is so condescending towards a man who is intellectually lightyears ahead of him. I know it would look bad on John but he could so verbally destroy Bill.
Most of Obama voters are Living off the government tit!
They are low life people that are able bodied, yet live off government assistance. I.E. Welfare, WIC, Food Stamps etc. healthy welfare recipients that are able to work but choose not to because they are satisfied with their welfare checks for doing nothing.
The people living off the government tit are the largest voter pool for the democratic party.
When OReilly comes on, I switch to Fox BUSINESS News and watch Judge Andrew Napolitano on "Freedom Watch." I get the news of the day and learn about the Constitution! What a deal!
Really sorry but as an english guy, I totally understood what Stuart said at the end there. As a 'Patriotic' American, how can O Reilly not get it?????
I feel so bad for the US having a moron like him presenting national news commentary.
men if only our leaders disagreed like this two and actually challenged each other like this we would be in a much more better shape. two guys from very different political philosophies and ideology yet they can sit at same table challenge each other and still have fun at it. this is how our political debate should look like
Most of Obama voters are Living off the government tit!
They are low life people that are able bodied, yet live off government assistance. I.E. Welfare, WIC, Food Stamps etc. healthy welfare recipients that are able to work but choose not to because they are satisfied with their welfare checks for doing nothing.
The people living off the government tit are the largest voter pool for the democratic party.
@paulstrong123 You just insulted forty million Americans. One is Six of Americans depend on government aid, you don't think some of those are republicans? And my own mother. Who works nights at a hospital, goes to college during the day and needs food stamps to try and feed her children. Also there are approximately 41 million Americans working two jobs and still struggling below the poverty line, probably doing more work in their average week than you have done in a lifetime.
its telling that o'reilly doesn't understand that you're supposed to be open minded and you're allowed to change your mind over who you vote for in light of evidence. You can see his brain reading 'does not compute' when Jon says he's not a complete partisan hack
Quote of the Week: "I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites" - Senator Barack Hussein Obama
I like to consider myself a moderate. Having said that, I think Fox News is brain-washing people to a frightening degree and they are very much responsible for the polarization of this nation. We need more moderates. You hardly ever hear of them mentioned these days and there used to be more. Reagan-Democrats seem the last example. I do love Jon Stewart! He's funny, he's honest, and he does his job. He's a politically based comedian and I think his show has gained a lot of respect.
@CaptainPriceLives Fox News built up Mr. Cain, because he was new, because he's black. O'Reilly said Mr. Cain couldn't win, that the GOP has promised Romney the nomination already. Fox ignored Dr. Paul completely. Now, I see Fox TEARING DOWN Mr. Cain! Build him up, just to tear him down? That's dirty of Fox. When O'Reilly comes on tv, I switch the channel to Fox Business News "Freedom Watch." to learn about the news of the day and the CONSTITUTION.
Topics: Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc2.yolasite.com
figure4etc1.yolasite.com
etc.
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
Too the man below me, do you believe everything you've read on the Internet? I sure don't or won't...blah blah the holocaust didn't happen! Blah blah moon landing faked! Blah blah government killed Kennedy!
Obama is a total puppet now. He started off as a real person, but the shadow government probably threatened his family and a major american city. There is a missing nuclear weapon, missing since Cheney decided to move them. They hadn't been moved since the 60s btw. 9/11 was computer graphics shown as live tv. The proof is in on that. check out my favorites for more info. INVESTIGATE. ACT.
depends on the night depends on the rating... bill o reilly will do ANYTHING to try to discredit this guy. lol people who see the world logically. never understand why were labeled as LIBERAL
i have no idea whats being discussed here, but i can tell by the length of the comments that it is some type of awful argument. colon, open parentheses.
marijuana is dangerous, gay people can get married all ready in every state and yes bring the troops home. before you ask, any man can marry any woman. and any woman can marry any man. marriage is defined a certain way. if we redefine it, why is it then sacred and special? what is so important about 2 people, why not three or seven? Why not relatives? gays don't want equal rights on this particular issue, they want uber rights. thumbs down please. I like low ratings.
@Follower172 No, they don't have equal rights. It's sexism to allow susie to marry Bob, but you won't let me marry Bob. That is blatant sexism. Also, marriage isn't sacred or special. The traditional marriage was a) trade a pig for a guys 12 year old daughter, or b) Invade a village, rape a woman, and put a lock/chain on her finger to remind her that you own her now.
I think it's seriously messed up for anyone to prescribe to traditional marriage, I just don't like underage slave rape.
@Follower172 What? How is being able to marry someone of the same gender an "uber right"?
That doesn't make any sense. And there is no such thing as "sacred and special". What is sacred about marriage? You know what it means to get married? It's a court document, signed by you and another, plus one witness, brought together by an individual of authority. Why can't a man and a man, or a woman and a woman do that? It's ridiculous.
@Xltdizzle Marriage is a sacred institution given by God. Not given by the state. I don't think the state should even be able to mandate marriage. Gay couples can live together, they currently do have ALL the rights that married people have (taxes and such). A Man can marry ANY woman he wants to. A Woman can marry any MAN she wants to. If you don't like it, change the definition that the federal gov. uses. but then, what is so special about 2? Why not 3 people. why not brother/sister?
@Follower172 Take God out of it. Church and state are separate. I also don't believe in God. I'm Canadian, so I can't change it, but there are plenty of people down there trying for me. New York got through, so that's good news!
And yeah, I get that a man can marry a woman, and a woman can marry a man. Do you think I'm an idiot?
If a man can marry a woman, it's simply not right that a man can't marry a man. Slowly your worldly views are shrinking, and one day there will be none of you left.
@Xltdizzle Sure, I will ignore the FACT that marriage is a religious institution that was given by God for the purpose of God's glory and there is an appropriate way to have marriage, and that what is being proposed by you and others is a profination of that institution, I will just ignore it. No. The definition of marriage presupposes God. I re-affirm my previous statement.
@Follower172 Okay, so if we're going to ignore the fact that the "definition" of marriage that YOU ascribe to does not mention God in the slightest, then I'm going to ignore the fact that the "definition" states it should be a man and a woman. Besides, I'm Canadian, our definition is clearly different, because we don't care who gets married. You know why? Because it shouldn't matter. Does it hurt you, to see a man love a man? Probably not, because that would be silly.
@Xltdizzle I was being sarcastic dude. I don't care what you think the definition is, or where you think it came from. It came from God. God instituted marriage, not man. The reason it is man and woman is because God created people...as man and woman. I don't care if you are canadian, czec, australian or from frezno. God is the one who is responsible for marriage
@Xltdizzle How am I a bigot? because I stand up for what is right? How about this. You are a bigot for not believing that marriage is for a man and a woman. Such a stupid argument. and usually, inconsistency of argument or stupidity of argument is a sign of a falied argument. Family is the bedrock of society. Gay couples cannot contribute to society the way straight married couples can. They cannot reproduce, their unions guarantee that childred won't have one parent...you hate kids!
@Follower172 Stupidity of an argument is all on your side of the table. Look at how many STRAIGHT couples get themselves pregnant, and just abort the fetus, or put it up for adoption? Gay couples are fully capable of adoption and raising a child in need that way, which contributes just as much to society. It's actually MORE helpful to adopt, seeing as populations are getting WAY too big for our own good anyway. I love children. Also, I'm not a bigot, I'm not the intolerant one here.
@Xltdizzle So your argument against my argument is another example of the profination of marriage? Did you ever hear me defend straight couples who profane marriage? No. And btw putting a child up for adoption is a good thing...Gay couples cannot contribute unless they have someone ELSE have a child...so it isn't them contributing, it is the helper. You are not intolerant? it seems that you are not very tolerant of the person who stands up for traditional marriage. funny how the "tolerant"
@Follower172 The world is changing, and you are not. That is the only thing here that I can't tolerate. I respect your views enough to not fall into mere petty insults, and offer at least a debate, even though I disagree with them. So what if a gay couple has to let somebody else have the child? If they adopt a child, and that child grows up feeling loved, supported, etc, is that really such a bad thing? Did they not contribute?
@Xltdizzle No, they did not. 1) they didn't have the kid 2) they are guaranteeing that the kid(s) will grow up without one of the parents 3) they cannot actually carry on a society. And if marriage isn't a tradition, or isn't sacred, then what is sacred and meaningful about the number 2? Why just a man and woman, or man and man? or two women? why not three? why not a man and his daughter? Why not a brother and sister? if it is arbitrary and it is about rights...why not allow everyone?
@Follower172 If they adopt a child, and that child grows up and has a child of their own, how is that not carrying on a society? You're implying adopted kids don't matter, so long as it was a gay couple that adopted them. There is nothing "sacred and meaningful" behind the number two. A square is not a square if it has more than four sides. Two PEOPLE (of ANY gender) can be united in marriage. And there is a very, very obvious reason we don't let family marry. Why is that even an argument?
@Follower172 funny how the "tolerant" people are always the ones who are intolerant of ideas that are not in line with their ideas. Like you, the person who preaches "tolerance" and diversity...but when someone has a traditional view, or heaven help them, a Christian view, you never tolerate their point of view. you don't want diversity and tolerance. you want your ideas to be the ones that every person has. so you are by definition a bigot!
@Follower172 except allowing same sex couples the right to marry takes no rights away from opposite sex couples, while you are actively taking rights away from the queer community. which makes you a bigot.
@chlohioisforlovers What rights are being taken away? The definition of marriage is one man and one woman. Any homosexual man has the right to marry...a woman. And any homosexual woman has the right to marry...a man! That is why I said you don't want equal rights, you want uber rights. And you didged the question by the way. Why stop there? if marriage isn't sacred and special, why not allow father and daughter, bro and sis, 35 year old woman and 14 year old boy? polygamy? why not?
@chlohioisforlovers Also, gay people discriminate also. They don't want a father to have the "right" to marry his daughter. or a teacher the "right" to marry her student. They don't want a man to have many wives, or a woman to have many husbands. So why aren't they being accused of denying rights? if it is all just about "rights" why not be consistent and argue for everyone's rights? what is so special about 2 people being brought together in matrimoney?
@Follower172 Is there an article written by a gay activist or pundit advocating a ban on these things? Is there any video? If you're talking about a marriage between an adult and, say, a 15 year old, understand that a 15 year old is not considered to be a consenting adult. And since marriage is, ultimately, a legal contract, a 15 year old would not be able to sign off on that, neither would animals (since I know that's come up too). I just want to understand your definition of 'they'.
@Gunman610 Um, that doesn't matter. be consistent. if we are talking about rights and lvoe, then what you said doesn't matter. who are we to tell a man that he can't marry his daughter? who is society to say no to that? after all, you are calling society to change its opinion on same sex marriage...the point is, you have no basis for what you are saying because to you it is simply about a contract, rights and love. To me, and in reality it is about God. and honoring God.
TIME IS OVER.IT’S ONLY THE START…Osama Bin Laden Dead May 1,2011 / Hitler Dead April 30,1945 66 Years Apart!Another 6 is coming this year.Microchip-666 in hands and foreheads.Hell is real!Earthquakes,famines,floods..Obama-America threw Israel under the bus!ISRAEL lost its only friend-WWIII!Bible Prophecy!TO NON BELIEVERS REPENT SAVE YOUR SOULS AND PRAY FOR OTHERS.JESUS IS COMING,RAPTURE IS COMING!Get raptured not suffer the great tribulation.LISTEN TO PAUL BEGLEY IN YOUTUBE.
@TigerIPanzer Were you watching the same interview as everyone else? I think you might want to take off your blinders for a minute or two there, champ.
despite that they might be debating to raise ratings. (tongue twister lol) I noticed the mutual respect between them even though they disagree so much. I think that is the coolest part of this conversation.
Why dont you ever see conervetives fighting for cvil rights? hell if they would stand up for one thing other than the right to guns and taxes are to high.
How the fuck could the fool pretend he didn't understand Jon Stewart's Roosevelt/Reagan point about Obama? That's not clever, it's not even witty, it's plain dishonest. If not, he's a bigger idiot than he appears to be.
Obama probably hasn't lived up to his expectations, because when he was running for President, nearly everyone just expected him to fix the whole wide world in his first year of office. Then, when he couldn't, everyone started to hate him again, especially when they figured out we were in a bigger mess than previously thought.
Yeah, it's just upsetting b/c I wish instead of all the democrats just hoping he would take care of everything, I think they should all stick together and support each other instead of trying to get republican support.
@internationalvibe It's not just that he couldn't fix...he didn't even try and so far actually gave to republicans more than they asked. And now he is the one that seems to be eager to make social security and medicare cuts than the republicans and doesn't even fight for taxing the rich and has the audacity to paint his decisions as "shared sacrifice".
If anyone can't see that he is a fucking weasel who only cares to get elected...then they are fucking idiots.
@internationalvibe - I don't think it was just that. The Repubs have gone out of their way to spoil any living persons chance of making any difference. They have held the country to ransome, attacked an elected official more than any other human on earth, they have constructed lies and fabrications, all in a hissy fit because "their team wasn't in power". I do think though Obama is to blame for the latest holdup by not detailing it to the American people, instead he keeps playing mr nice guy.
Lol the description to this vid is soooo biased. Hey fox, if u want more viewers, try to be more open minded. But then again u already have enough followers... Meh... Just stay the same
@BrunoDaKeeper Every Democrat that has run for office in the last 2 decades has said that.
People need to learn to stop going by what people SAY, and start going by what they DO.
And that applies to everyone, no matter the party. Hold your own accountable and stop pointing the finger at the other party...they are YOUR representitives, hold them accountable.
@TradingTutor In my opinion, they should at least decriminalize it so you dont go to prison for it
and Portugal and Holland decriminalized marijuana and increased the penalties for harder drugs like cocaine and heroine which i think is something america should follow
@BrunoDaKeeper they decriminalized marijuana in Portugal? I'm from Portugal, and didn't know that... Well that might explain why some many people I know are potheads, when 10 years ago there were almost no teens that did drugs. It's sad to see smart school colleagues screwing up their lives and even changing their personality because of drugs...
"in 2001 portugal became the first European country to officially abolish all criminal penalties for personal possession of drugs, including marijuana, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine."
ill send u the link to time magazine's article on "THE EUROPEAN COUNTRY WITH THE MOST RELAXED DRUG LAWS"
@BrunoDaKeeper I'm English, so I agree with the first and last suggestion, but I don't have to agree with the middle suggestion because we have allowed homosexual marriage, albeit named as "civil partnership" rather than marriage. Two out of three ain't bad, especially when one of them is bringing heroic soldiers and admirable people out of a rogue oil robbery that is a disgrace to both our countries.
@scaryninja1693 Thanks 4 the opinion, the reason i think we should let them get married is that for example New York just passed a gay marriage law and they have a part in the law where churches don't have to marry them, marriage in a religious sense is up to the religion but with a civil partnership most insurance companies won't allow for someone who has a civil partnership to be under their partner's healthcare plan which in my opinion is not right, church should be seperate from government
@BrunoDaKeeper Can't say I disagree with you on that one either, Church should definately be seperate to government, in fact, religion as a whole should be seperate. Westboro Baptist Church should be subject to the law, not protected by it, I don't see how people can be allowed to protest at military funerals, especially when they're openly honest that they're doing it for homophobic reasons. That's probably the most extreme form of religion manipulating government, but the point remains.
@scaryninja1693 yea i hate Westboro Baptist Church, they preach about being good but then go around hating people which is what religion preaches against doing, but it would be a little difficult to protect some religions while making laws against others, and then there is the problem with people saying what can be considered a religion and what cant
@BrunoDaKeeper I'd say religions and cults are the same thing to be honest, if you are religious and have a large quantity of people on side with you it's religion, if the number of members is small it tends to be labelled a cult. As for laws, I don't care what your beliefs entail, if there is one thing that religions or even people in general shouldn't be allowed to do, it's preach against the dead at their own funeral and make it public.
@scaryninja1693 I think what they do is terrible, but you can't expect free speech and expect it to be denied to others at the same time. They're expressing themselves, they have the right to make complete asses of themselves and become the most hated people in America.
There is the major crux of the O'Reilly/Limbah end of the spectrum philosophy: when Stewart says you dont know much about me, and OReilly replies "And I dont want to." speaks to how these people know little about the hardships of those (gays, illegal/legal immigrants, welfare cases) they criticize/blame for society's problems, and they refuse to educate themselves on the issues. instead on are content with their biases and mal-informed opinions, as well as their skewed "facts"
"I didn't understand a word of that but it sounded really good." I'm guessing that this is what goes on in O'Reilly's brain before he says anything
nakiommi 3 days ago
its always very cool to see two totally differently adjusted guys getting along so well with each other!
Thronsohn 4 days ago
reilly is a comedian an a good/fair loser!
reacting with a "nnngggg.....yeah" on THAT punchline from steward made my day!!!
yohannes80 4 days ago
Obama really should have been the Democratic Reagan, but he hasn't been, has he? He's been pretty ineffectual.
I like the question of whether Stewart would vote for a Republican in the right scenario, and I wonder if O'Reilly would be open-minded enough to vote for a Democrat in the right scenario.
38Gaucho 1 week ago
I want these two to keep interviewing each other forever. I love them both.
Nilbop 1 week ago
"I didn't understand a word of that"
Well that speaks on his intelligence.
TheOneAndOnlyNAB 1 week ago
While I don't have beef with Obama, this made so much sense to me! No, he didn't live up to my expectations, but maybe they were too high? This is the proper way to say "I'm disappointed."
koolhatesme 1 month ago
This is great! I watched this same bit cut with a democrat view ...How dumbass is this shit journalism in the first place?... How about showing the whole thing, and let people make up their own minds?
Airperra 1 month ago
"Millions of people " are watching O'Reilly? I don't think so! (maybe to gather comedic material :-p)
26yearstoorion 1 month ago
@26yearstoorion They are watching it because Stewart is there in the interview. I am, at least
MrTrollingStone 3 weeks ago
@26yearstoorion 3 million watch o'reilly nightly. no one else even comes close, except for other hosts on fox news
baseballkid077 2 weeks ago
I love at the end when he does what O'Reilly does to him right back at him: putting words that he doesn't agree with in his mouth.
jdebruynviolin 1 month ago
3:51 - lol Perfet exchange.
gcastellanos02 1 month ago 2
@axe215 read my msg below. I'm too lazy to retype it.
rememberthis218 1 month ago
@axe215 you just commented to yourself. Way to make yourself look like the winner in your little argument... dumbass.
rememberthis218 1 month ago
Bill O'Reilly is like the retarded kid that never gets it, and Stewart is the class genius trying to help the kid out.
Kyalaen 1 month ago 5
@Kyalaen and you're that know-it-all kid who thinks he knows everything but is really clueless. yeah?
szeilea 1 month ago
@szeilea I'm not even american yet I still believe I have more understanding of how your political system works, than a lot of ethnic americans. I do not claim to know it all, but you dont have to be a genius to see that Bill O'Reilly fails to reach logical conclusions and that he stirrs up a lot of hate over petty things. Jon Stewart always gives the more logical and reasonable answer, not like the overpatriotic-christian value-paranoid bullcrap that Bill spews out from time to time. Yeah?
Kyalaen 1 month ago
@Kyalaen look, O'Reilly might be short-tempered and radical, but the man tells the facts. This country was founded on the Christian faith and we need to keep it that way, liberals are tearing that apart and that's what scares me.
szeilea 1 month ago
@szeilea you essentially just said, that the only faith that is acceptable in the U.S. is Christianity. The country was founded upon democratic values and a secular view about how to mediate power with checks and balances to prevent from despots in office. Dude. are you really going to say that a country was founded on a religion? does the constitution, anywhere, dictate that the Christian faith must be upheld? do a fact check on Fox's bullshit before you attack others for telling the truth
axe251 1 month ago
@axe251 first off, you're not even american so you dont even have valid points to argue because you have no true idea what you're talking about (no offense). you clearly haven't heard our pledge of allegience, seen our money, read constitution, or anything. You have no idea. The founding fathers were all great christian men and to say otherwise is completely ignorant
szeilea 1 month ago
@szeilea really? ur going to claim I'm "unamerican" just because I support religious diversity, as the U.S. does? Sure the founding fathers were Christian, and religion does percolate into aspects of America, but the constitution was founded upon checks and balances on government, not christianity. Compromise, protection of the classes as shown by Jefferson. Though Christianity is undoubtedly the majority, one should not discount the myriad of diversity represented in "American Religion."
axe251 1 month ago 2
@axe251 oh and btw, I'm an American, and I live in America. You shouldn't assume that because I disagree with you I'm not an American
axe251 1 month ago
Haha bill looks like the grinch too
CaBr0n76 1 month ago
hahahah i love john stewartt.
ilovejb5789 1 month ago
What a lame audience..
NorwegianPotato 1 month ago
@NorwegianPotato Its the O'Reilly factor... I think your statement is redundant ;)
test123ok 1 month ago
@test123ok Haha, true :)
NorwegianPotato 1 month ago
Obama is about as useful as a one legged man at an ass kicking competition.
spicyMcHAGGIS9green 1 month ago 2
...what he said
Eye2EyeIIIV 1 month ago
I honestly think they could do a daily show together and become a legendary talk show, topping Lettermen, Leno, O'brien, 60 Mins....everything. I would imagine the ratings would be higher than anything else on tv.... Like a REAL Hannity and combes.
QueenetBowie 2 months ago
this is the exact way every democrat is, they can sit there and trash republicans to no end, not know what they expect from their candidate or party, then when they have to explain what they want for a political candidate mummer and stutter step out a sentence that makes no sense whatsoever.
soxnpats4lyfe 2 months ago
I love Bill! - He stands his ground , and takes matters seriously
Jon on the other hand is a secular clown, but pretty clever I'll say
ASKBELLA1 2 months ago
@ASKBELLA1 "Secular Clown".
Just like the founding fathers were Secular Clowns.
TheSpartanondrugs 2 months ago 4
@ASKBELLA1 lol ur gay bro
xxstaggerxx 2 months ago
@ASKBELLA1
Not sure I missed any irony in your statement or not. Bill seems to be the most presumptious of the two, and seems to sit firmly in his own secular beliefs whereas Jon seems more open minded and tends to consider each issue differently. Bill inferring that Jon's criticism is merely a left or right issue is both ignorant and besides the point, when really you should judge any candidate by merit, be it a democratic president or Republican letting the American people down.
AlfTheTroll 2 months ago
@ASKBELLA1 And you must be one of those self righteous christian trolls aren't you?
LouieV6 1 month ago
2:00 I like the way O'Riely says 'thats not nice' you can tell he is thinking he wants to say 'thats not right' but can't bring himself to. Ironcially 'thants not nice' is the more accurate statement.
Nexius8 2 months ago
Gotta love those ADHD cuts to clips of stewart disrupting the interview, not to mention generally choppy editing. What sort of attention span does Fox cater to?
nw82 2 months ago
bill is a moron.
biglu30 2 months ago in playlist More videos from FoxNewsInsider
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm getting sick and tired of hearing clips with stupid assholes trying to compare Obama to JFK... no, you media whores; that is an insult to President Kennedy and everything he did for us, and his sacrifice. Obama is a cheap whore. There is no comparison.
melbyRick 2 months ago
Starting to wonder if these two are friends
SampleName236 3 months ago
I love how Bill is so condescending towards a man who is intellectually lightyears ahead of him. I know it would look bad on John but he could so verbally destroy Bill.
Ffguy82 3 months ago 3
@Ffguy82 its called being the bigger man
poratosk8r2 2 months ago
Fuck O'Reilly
Wilson7imawesome 3 months ago 2
VOTE RON PAUL U.S DEPENDS ON IT
johnnyblazeksgldp 3 months ago 3
Bill is such a dick trying to get stabs att Jon all the time.
9mmMetal 3 months ago
I can't beleive fox posts this stuff. You just look like idiots.
Blacknwhiteweed 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Obama Tit Suckers: :-0
Most of Obama voters are Living off the government tit!
They are low life people that are able bodied, yet live off government assistance. I.E. Welfare, WIC, Food Stamps etc. healthy welfare recipients that are able to work but choose not to because they are satisfied with their welfare checks for doing nothing.
The people living off the government tit are the largest voter pool for the democratic party.
paulstrong123 4 months ago
SMH @ Bill making passive-aggressive insults to Jon because he knows Jon's logic has made him look retarded to his right-wing "audience"
herakuzi 4 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
When OReilly comes on, I switch to Fox BUSINESS News and watch Judge Andrew Napolitano on "Freedom Watch." I get the news of the day and learn about the Constitution! What a deal!
vechorik 4 months ago
Really sorry but as an english guy, I totally understood what Stuart said at the end there. As a 'Patriotic' American, how can O Reilly not get it?????
I feel so bad for the US having a moron like him presenting national news commentary.
commontongues 4 months ago 17
men if only our leaders disagreed like this two and actually challenged each other like this we would be in a much more better shape. two guys from very different political philosophies and ideology yet they can sit at same table challenge each other and still have fun at it. this is how our political debate should look like
flintskull1 5 months ago
1:50 He's such an asshole because he knows nobody likes him and just then he realized the he will lose his only friend if he continues down that path
ElJefer 5 months ago
Obama Tit Suckers: :-0
Most of Obama voters are Living off the government tit!
They are low life people that are able bodied, yet live off government assistance. I.E. Welfare, WIC, Food Stamps etc. healthy welfare recipients that are able to work but choose not to because they are satisfied with their welfare checks for doing nothing.
The people living off the government tit are the largest voter pool for the democratic party.
paulstrong123 5 months ago
@paulstrong123 Soooo... Obama supporters get tits? AWESOME!
TheRollingCubes 4 months ago
@paulstrong123 You just insulted forty million Americans. One is Six of Americans depend on government aid, you don't think some of those are republicans? And my own mother. Who works nights at a hospital, goes to college during the day and needs food stamps to try and feed her children. Also there are approximately 41 million Americans working two jobs and still struggling below the poverty line, probably doing more work in their average week than you have done in a lifetime.
yeah3191 2 months ago
its telling that o'reilly doesn't understand that you're supposed to be open minded and you're allowed to change your mind over who you vote for in light of evidence. You can see his brain reading 'does not compute' when Jon says he's not a complete partisan hack
cambridgeecon 5 months ago
i want a chill cheese burger from Tommys
mlbjosh8 5 months ago
Quote of the Week: "I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites" - Senator Barack Hussein Obama
paulstrong123 5 months ago
O'reilly is a pompous ass.
totallyawesomevideos 5 months ago
I like to consider myself a moderate. Having said that, I think Fox News is brain-washing people to a frightening degree and they are very much responsible for the polarization of this nation. We need more moderates. You hardly ever hear of them mentioned these days and there used to be more. Reagan-Democrats seem the last example. I do love Jon Stewart! He's funny, he's honest, and he does his job. He's a politically based comedian and I think his show has gained a lot of respect.
1105Chance 6 months ago
I kind of wish these two would do a regular segment on each other's shows.
CaptainPriceLives 6 months ago 88
@CaptainPriceLives that would be amazing...
SamAt5am 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CaptainPriceLives Fox News built up Mr. Cain, because he was new, because he's black. O'Reilly said Mr. Cain couldn't win, that the GOP has promised Romney the nomination already. Fox ignored Dr. Paul completely. Now, I see Fox TEARING DOWN Mr. Cain! Build him up, just to tear him down? That's dirty of Fox. When O'Reilly comes on tv, I switch the channel to Fox Business News "Freedom Watch." to learn about the news of the day and the CONSTITUTION.
vechorik 4 months ago
Obama is just too dumb to have anything to offer the country.
hangfire0352 6 months ago
Gov Huntsman jams a song to OBAMA- Hit The Road Jack now on youtube
musicmoney21 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Everyone Wake Up!
Obama is Destroying this Country!
For Gods Sake, We elected a Freaking "Community Organizer" to Run this Country off a Cliff! :-(
Please, let's all band together and Vote him out in 2012! :-)
paulstrong123 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 2012!!!!
ETThExtraTerrestrial 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK FOR DEBATES AND GOVERNANCE
Topics: Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc2.yolasite.com
figure4etc1.yolasite.com
etc.
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
TheServiceWeb 6 months ago
Too the man below me, do you believe everything you've read on the Internet? I sure don't or won't...blah blah the holocaust didn't happen! Blah blah moon landing faked! Blah blah government killed Kennedy!
Messmaster08 6 months ago
Obama is a total puppet now. He started off as a real person, but the shadow government probably threatened his family and a major american city. There is a missing nuclear weapon, missing since Cheney decided to move them. They hadn't been moved since the 60s btw. 9/11 was computer graphics shown as live tv. The proof is in on that. check out my favorites for more info. INVESTIGATE. ACT.
beastshawnee 6 months ago
Comment removed
magicx3434 6 months ago
@beastshawnee Someone should contact homeland security on your ass
magicx3434 6 months ago
Politics can be pretty depressing, but I gotta say...I love these two guys together. It's very entertaining.
Banes500 6 months ago
depends on the night depends on the rating... bill o reilly will do ANYTHING to try to discredit this guy. lol people who see the world logically. never understand why were labeled as LIBERAL
doonymacc 6 months ago
@BarackObamaHasAids youze trowllin
lovefromeponine 7 months ago 23
Comment removed
engaine 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i bet they fuck.
mattykRonPaul2012 7 months ago
i have no idea whats being discussed here, but i can tell by the length of the comments that it is some type of awful argument. colon, open parentheses.
sheyet2 7 months ago
bill oreilly is an awkward spaz. after talking with stewart, i'd come home and drink myself to sleep in depression
VvRushvV 7 months ago
Jon Stewart is not funny. Shocking, I know...
ehhyouseful 8 months ago
*Cheap marketing alert* There's a new Jon Stewart app out for the iphone/ipad, it delivers a daily quote from the man himself.
bm359 8 months ago
O'reilly is suh an asshole lol...tool
sfockerstitv 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
obama's conscience: youtube.com/watch?v=Xatp9WgHFNE
continuo1685 8 months ago
Comment removed
continuo1685 8 months ago
marijuana is dangerous, gay people can get married all ready in every state and yes bring the troops home. before you ask, any man can marry any woman. and any woman can marry any man. marriage is defined a certain way. if we redefine it, why is it then sacred and special? what is so important about 2 people, why not three or seven? Why not relatives? gays don't want equal rights on this particular issue, they want uber rights. thumbs down please. I like low ratings.
Follower172 8 months ago
@Follower172 No, they don't have equal rights. It's sexism to allow susie to marry Bob, but you won't let me marry Bob. That is blatant sexism. Also, marriage isn't sacred or special. The traditional marriage was a) trade a pig for a guys 12 year old daughter, or b) Invade a village, rape a woman, and put a lock/chain on her finger to remind her that you own her now.
I think it's seriously messed up for anyone to prescribe to traditional marriage, I just don't like underage slave rape.
rpottage 8 months ago
@Follower172 What? How is being able to marry someone of the same gender an "uber right"?
That doesn't make any sense. And there is no such thing as "sacred and special". What is sacred about marriage? You know what it means to get married? It's a court document, signed by you and another, plus one witness, brought together by an individual of authority. Why can't a man and a man, or a woman and a woman do that? It's ridiculous.
Xltdizzle 8 months ago
@Xltdizzle Marriage is a sacred institution given by God. Not given by the state. I don't think the state should even be able to mandate marriage. Gay couples can live together, they currently do have ALL the rights that married people have (taxes and such). A Man can marry ANY woman he wants to. A Woman can marry any MAN she wants to. If you don't like it, change the definition that the federal gov. uses. but then, what is so special about 2? Why not 3 people. why not brother/sister?
Follower172 8 months ago
@Follower172 Take God out of it. Church and state are separate. I also don't believe in God. I'm Canadian, so I can't change it, but there are plenty of people down there trying for me. New York got through, so that's good news!
And yeah, I get that a man can marry a woman, and a woman can marry a man. Do you think I'm an idiot?
If a man can marry a woman, it's simply not right that a man can't marry a man. Slowly your worldly views are shrinking, and one day there will be none of you left.
Xltdizzle 8 months ago
@Follower172 Also nowhere in the definition of Marriage is God mentioned. So definitely keep God off of your tongue when discussing it.
Xltdizzle 8 months ago
@Xltdizzle Sure, I will ignore the FACT that marriage is a religious institution that was given by God for the purpose of God's glory and there is an appropriate way to have marriage, and that what is being proposed by you and others is a profination of that institution, I will just ignore it. No. The definition of marriage presupposes God. I re-affirm my previous statement.
Follower172 8 months ago
@Follower172 Okay, so if we're going to ignore the fact that the "definition" of marriage that YOU ascribe to does not mention God in the slightest, then I'm going to ignore the fact that the "definition" states it should be a man and a woman. Besides, I'm Canadian, our definition is clearly different, because we don't care who gets married. You know why? Because it shouldn't matter. Does it hurt you, to see a man love a man? Probably not, because that would be silly.
Xltdizzle 8 months ago
@Xltdizzle I was being sarcastic dude. I don't care what you think the definition is, or where you think it came from. It came from God. God instituted marriage, not man. The reason it is man and woman is because God created people...as man and woman. I don't care if you are canadian, czec, australian or from frezno. God is the one who is responsible for marriage
Follower172 8 months ago
@Follower172 I don't know how people like you live with such bigotry. Way to avoid the question, by the way.
Xltdizzle 7 months ago
@Xltdizzle How am I a bigot? because I stand up for what is right? How about this. You are a bigot for not believing that marriage is for a man and a woman. Such a stupid argument. and usually, inconsistency of argument or stupidity of argument is a sign of a falied argument. Family is the bedrock of society. Gay couples cannot contribute to society the way straight married couples can. They cannot reproduce, their unions guarantee that childred won't have one parent...you hate kids!
Follower172 7 months ago
@Follower172 Stupidity of an argument is all on your side of the table. Look at how many STRAIGHT couples get themselves pregnant, and just abort the fetus, or put it up for adoption? Gay couples are fully capable of adoption and raising a child in need that way, which contributes just as much to society. It's actually MORE helpful to adopt, seeing as populations are getting WAY too big for our own good anyway. I love children. Also, I'm not a bigot, I'm not the intolerant one here.
Xltdizzle 7 months ago
@Xltdizzle So your argument against my argument is another example of the profination of marriage? Did you ever hear me defend straight couples who profane marriage? No. And btw putting a child up for adoption is a good thing...Gay couples cannot contribute unless they have someone ELSE have a child...so it isn't them contributing, it is the helper. You are not intolerant? it seems that you are not very tolerant of the person who stands up for traditional marriage. funny how the "tolerant"
Follower172 7 months ago
@Follower172 The world is changing, and you are not. That is the only thing here that I can't tolerate. I respect your views enough to not fall into mere petty insults, and offer at least a debate, even though I disagree with them. So what if a gay couple has to let somebody else have the child? If they adopt a child, and that child grows up feeling loved, supported, etc, is that really such a bad thing? Did they not contribute?
Xltdizzle 7 months ago
@Xltdizzle No, they did not. 1) they didn't have the kid 2) they are guaranteeing that the kid(s) will grow up without one of the parents 3) they cannot actually carry on a society. And if marriage isn't a tradition, or isn't sacred, then what is sacred and meaningful about the number 2? Why just a man and woman, or man and man? or two women? why not three? why not a man and his daughter? Why not a brother and sister? if it is arbitrary and it is about rights...why not allow everyone?
Follower172 7 months ago
@Follower172 If they adopt a child, and that child grows up and has a child of their own, how is that not carrying on a society? You're implying adopted kids don't matter, so long as it was a gay couple that adopted them. There is nothing "sacred and meaningful" behind the number two. A square is not a square if it has more than four sides. Two PEOPLE (of ANY gender) can be united in marriage. And there is a very, very obvious reason we don't let family marry. Why is that even an argument?
Xltdizzle 7 months ago
@Follower172 funny how the "tolerant" people are always the ones who are intolerant of ideas that are not in line with their ideas. Like you, the person who preaches "tolerance" and diversity...but when someone has a traditional view, or heaven help them, a Christian view, you never tolerate their point of view. you don't want diversity and tolerance. you want your ideas to be the ones that every person has. so you are by definition a bigot!
Follower172 7 months ago
@Follower172 except allowing same sex couples the right to marry takes no rights away from opposite sex couples, while you are actively taking rights away from the queer community. which makes you a bigot.
chlohioisforlovers 7 months ago
@chlohioisforlovers What rights are being taken away? The definition of marriage is one man and one woman. Any homosexual man has the right to marry...a woman. And any homosexual woman has the right to marry...a man! That is why I said you don't want equal rights, you want uber rights. And you didged the question by the way. Why stop there? if marriage isn't sacred and special, why not allow father and daughter, bro and sis, 35 year old woman and 14 year old boy? polygamy? why not?
Follower172 7 months ago
@chlohioisforlovers Also, gay people discriminate also. They don't want a father to have the "right" to marry his daughter. or a teacher the "right" to marry her student. They don't want a man to have many wives, or a woman to have many husbands. So why aren't they being accused of denying rights? if it is all just about "rights" why not be consistent and argue for everyone's rights? what is so special about 2 people being brought together in matrimoney?
Follower172 7 months ago
@Follower172 Is there an article written by a gay activist or pundit advocating a ban on these things? Is there any video? If you're talking about a marriage between an adult and, say, a 15 year old, understand that a 15 year old is not considered to be a consenting adult. And since marriage is, ultimately, a legal contract, a 15 year old would not be able to sign off on that, neither would animals (since I know that's come up too). I just want to understand your definition of 'they'.
Gunman610 7 months ago
@Gunman610 Um, that doesn't matter. be consistent. if we are talking about rights and lvoe, then what you said doesn't matter. who are we to tell a man that he can't marry his daughter? who is society to say no to that? after all, you are calling society to change its opinion on same sex marriage...the point is, you have no basis for what you are saying because to you it is simply about a contract, rights and love. To me, and in reality it is about God. and honoring God.
Follower172 7 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper I gave you thumbs up, because I will vote for that man, Ron Paul.
Greenslime300 8 months ago
"I didnt understand any of that but it sounded good" WTF??
fuckyourcouch226 8 months ago 2
O'Reilly is such a cocksucker
metyuewb 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 2012!!!
woodydavidson420 8 months ago
jon stewart is the MAN
BobDole3005 9 months ago
is it just me, or did anyone else die laughing when John called Bill "The Grinch"
pantlesJon 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
TIME IS OVER.IT’S ONLY THE START…Osama Bin Laden Dead May 1,2011 / Hitler Dead April 30,1945 66 Years Apart!Another 6 is coming this year.Microchip-666 in hands and foreheads.Hell is real!Earthquakes,famines,floods..Obama-America threw Israel under the bus!ISRAEL lost its only friend-WWIII!Bible Prophecy!TO NON BELIEVERS REPENT SAVE YOUR SOULS AND PRAY FOR OTHERS.JESUS IS COMING,RAPTURE IS COMING!Get raptured not suffer the great tribulation.LISTEN TO PAUL BEGLEY IN YOUTUBE.
TheENTERRAPTURE17 9 months ago
Just one question: Who gives a shit what Jon Stewart thinks?
VeriSheri 9 months ago
@VeriSheri Bill O'Reilly and Fox News? duh. thats why he's there.
gleefanatic2011 9 months ago
@gleefanatic2011 ...O'Reilly's show is going down the toilet. I don't even watch it anymore.
VeriSheri 9 months ago
fox news isn't news
Overbruce 9 months ago
Has anyone seen the unedit clip of this & Bill talking about Common interview? Its makes more sense but not FUCK NEWS. HACK THE PLANET.
gryce 9 months ago
you can see that Stewart without reading his autocue is a shy lame-assed pussy with nothing to say
TigerIPanzer 9 months ago
@TigerIPanzer Were you watching the same interview as everyone else? I think you might want to take off your blinders for a minute or two there, champ.
Rhuddlan 9 months ago
despite that they might be debating to raise ratings. (tongue twister lol) I noticed the mutual respect between them even though they disagree so much. I think that is the coolest part of this conversation.
TheUrbanRecluse 9 months ago
Why dont you ever see conervetives fighting for cvil rights? hell if they would stand up for one thing other than the right to guns and taxes are to high.
MrMrbobblehead 9 months ago
18,000 writers = collective hive mind...but still a mind. Some of what he
reads is not from him, but that doesn't mean it isn't true, nor that it doesn't
have meaning.
GlassAgate 9 months ago
o'reilly's an idiot. nothing but narrow-minded bullshit comes out of his mouth.
kgoodies008 9 months ago
i think jon took a massive bong hit just before this so the interview might seem more interesting.
tommos1 9 months ago
How the fuck could the fool pretend he didn't understand Jon Stewart's Roosevelt/Reagan point about Obama? That's not clever, it's not even witty, it's plain dishonest. If not, he's a bigger idiot than he appears to be.
G58 9 months ago
boring guest
xoxak888 9 months ago
o'reily at his best. :D
Jean0987654321 9 months ago
Obama probably hasn't lived up to his expectations, because when he was running for President, nearly everyone just expected him to fix the whole wide world in his first year of office. Then, when he couldn't, everyone started to hate him again, especially when they figured out we were in a bigger mess than previously thought.
At least that's how I see it.
internationalvibe 9 months ago 17
@internationalvibe
Yeah, it's just upsetting b/c I wish instead of all the democrats just hoping he would take care of everything, I think they should all stick together and support each other instead of trying to get republican support.
annpetasupporter 6 months ago
@internationalvibe
Because it seems obama is more interested in their support than the democrats which just gives them more power.
annpetasupporter 6 months ago
@internationalvibe It's not just that he couldn't fix...he didn't even try and so far actually gave to republicans more than they asked. And now he is the one that seems to be eager to make social security and medicare cuts than the republicans and doesn't even fight for taxing the rich and has the audacity to paint his decisions as "shared sacrifice".
If anyone can't see that he is a fucking weasel who only cares to get elected...then they are fucking idiots.
And that's how I see it.
lasku0007 6 months ago
@internationalvibe - I don't think it was just that. The Repubs have gone out of their way to spoil any living persons chance of making any difference. They have held the country to ransome, attacked an elected official more than any other human on earth, they have constructed lies and fabrications, all in a hissy fit because "their team wasn't in power". I do think though Obama is to blame for the latest holdup by not detailing it to the American people, instead he keeps playing mr nice guy.
TheSpankymonkey 6 months ago
Lol the description to this vid is soooo biased. Hey fox, if u want more viewers, try to be more open minded. But then again u already have enough followers... Meh... Just stay the same
PBJTA 9 months ago
@stewiegriffinx "twerk words". Hmm. Fox News fan?
jtbpnw 9 months ago
is it just me or has Bill's set gotten cheaper and cheaper looking over the years?
stiimuli 9 months ago
Legalize Marijuana, Let The gay people get married, Bring The Troops Back Home
THUMBS UP IF YOU WOULD VOTE FOR SOMEONE WHO SAID THAT
BrunoDaKeeper 9 months ago 116
@BrunoDaKeeper but what about ending the FED etc.....no one apart from you and your creepy friends want ron paul...stop being a douche.
92Disturbed 9 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper Dunno About the legalizing marijuana thing.
NoukonGlobal 9 months ago
@NoukonGlobal Everyone has their own opinions but here are my reasons for legalizing marijuana:
FIRST - the government would make alot of money from taxes,
SECOND - waste less money on the war on drugs
THIRD - Put less stress on the court systems
FINALLY - If cigarettes are legal and really addictive, why not legalize marijuana which is not chemically addictive
BrunoDaKeeper 9 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper I'm not entirely for cigarettes and alcohol being legal either.
If Marijuana was legalized though, it would have to be pretty monitored. (Overpriced as well)
NoukonGlobal 9 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper RON PAUL 2012
nsideirish 9 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper
Ron paul?
Armigo91 9 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper Every Democrat that has run for office in the last 2 decades has said that.
People need to learn to stop going by what people SAY, and start going by what they DO.
And that applies to everyone, no matter the party. Hold your own accountable and stop pointing the finger at the other party...they are YOUR representitives, hold them accountable.
rdrakken 9 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper Add universal healthcare and you have it down imo.
Neanderthalcouzin 9 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper not for marijuana getting legalized, but i agree with the rest. we don't want more potheads teens
TradingTutor 9 months ago
@TradingTutor In my opinion, they should at least decriminalize it so you dont go to prison for it
and Portugal and Holland decriminalized marijuana and increased the penalties for harder drugs like cocaine and heroine which i think is something america should follow
BrunoDaKeeper 9 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper they decriminalized marijuana in Portugal? I'm from Portugal, and didn't know that... Well that might explain why some many people I know are potheads, when 10 years ago there were almost no teens that did drugs. It's sad to see smart school colleagues screwing up their lives and even changing their personality because of drugs...
TradingTutor 9 months ago
@TradingTutor
"in 2001 portugal became the first European country to officially abolish all criminal penalties for personal possession of drugs, including marijuana, cocaine, heroin and methamphetamine."
ill send u the link to time magazine's article on "THE EUROPEAN COUNTRY WITH THE MOST RELAXED DRUG LAWS"
BrunoDaKeeper 9 months ago
@TradingTutor
I was a teen in Portugal 10 years ago and every teen who smoked - including many who didn't - also smoked pot back then. Nice try.
KatzeARL 8 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper LISTEN TO RON PAUL!!!
woodydavidson420 8 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper Yes but according to Mr. Bill O'Reilly, that would make me an angry anti-military, homosexual pot-head..
deadRoden7 8 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper Okay, good idea. Now go find them.
AmericanBadass44 7 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper I'm English, so I agree with the first and last suggestion, but I don't have to agree with the middle suggestion because we have allowed homosexual marriage, albeit named as "civil partnership" rather than marriage. Two out of three ain't bad, especially when one of them is bringing heroic soldiers and admirable people out of a rogue oil robbery that is a disgrace to both our countries.
scaryninja1693 7 months ago
@scaryninja1693 Thanks 4 the opinion, the reason i think we should let them get married is that for example New York just passed a gay marriage law and they have a part in the law where churches don't have to marry them, marriage in a religious sense is up to the religion but with a civil partnership most insurance companies won't allow for someone who has a civil partnership to be under their partner's healthcare plan which in my opinion is not right, church should be seperate from government
BrunoDaKeeper 7 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper Can't say I disagree with you on that one either, Church should definately be seperate to government, in fact, religion as a whole should be seperate. Westboro Baptist Church should be subject to the law, not protected by it, I don't see how people can be allowed to protest at military funerals, especially when they're openly honest that they're doing it for homophobic reasons. That's probably the most extreme form of religion manipulating government, but the point remains.
scaryninja1693 7 months ago
@scaryninja1693 yea i hate Westboro Baptist Church, they preach about being good but then go around hating people which is what religion preaches against doing, but it would be a little difficult to protect some religions while making laws against others, and then there is the problem with people saying what can be considered a religion and what cant
BrunoDaKeeper 7 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper I'd say religions and cults are the same thing to be honest, if you are religious and have a large quantity of people on side with you it's religion, if the number of members is small it tends to be labelled a cult. As for laws, I don't care what your beliefs entail, if there is one thing that religions or even people in general shouldn't be allowed to do, it's preach against the dead at their own funeral and make it public.
scaryninja1693 7 months ago
@scaryninja1693 I agree
BrunoDaKeeper 7 months ago
@scaryninja1693 I think what they do is terrible, but you can't expect free speech and expect it to be denied to others at the same time. They're expressing themselves, they have the right to make complete asses of themselves and become the most hated people in America.
lovefromeponine 7 months ago
@BrunoDaKeeper
Legalize Gay-Pot...Marridge!!!
DakNJaxter 7 months ago
There is the major crux of the O'Reilly/Limbah end of the spectrum philosophy: when Stewart says you dont know much about me, and OReilly replies "And I dont want to." speaks to how these people know little about the hardships of those (gays, illegal/legal immigrants, welfare cases) they criticize/blame for society's problems, and they refuse to educate themselves on the issues. instead on are content with their biases and mal-informed opinions, as well as their skewed "facts"
etheangel2220 9 months ago 5
re: 18000 writers.
Why not respond something like:
"Well, we're certainly not doing it live.."
Stewart is too gently on Billo.
Hirnlego999 9 months ago
they've got a batman and joker kind of relationship...
blackbuilt 9 months ago