Added: 5 years ago
From: baroccus
Views: 5,972
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (37)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You lie. There are 100s of on the spot eyewitnesses to the wreckage and the human remains. When you deny large bodies of easily available information to promote a theory that has absolutely ZERO evidence to support it, that makes you a liar by omission. In your case, you are among the more radical, spewing several uncorrobarated allegations at a time. You haven't done the slightest bit of research. You are a, typical "truther", world class liar. You got nothing of any value to say, LIAR...bye!

  • OMG 9/11 BLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLA fucking hell...

  • Sorry I think you have a bit too much water in your wooden shoes. Those examples are shape charges. not thermite.

    thermite debunked,

    search youtube

    ySHgiUxnLC0

  • All the shit was hoisted up to those critical floors in Aug and sure those cutting charges were well placed then as well....

  • Why so many parts of aircraft found at WTC but none at The Pentagon????sounds like BS lots of it.

  • @deltaalpha21074 If you havn't seen the pictures of the pentagon with pieces of what is obviously the remains of an aircraft, it is only because you havn't looked. Those pics are all over the net.

  • @biggbrattz Sorry to tell you but wasn't to hard for CIA spooks to place scrap crap in that section they hit hard with a missle one that disintegrates with CORDITE ie smokless powder and foll kids like you!

  • Thermite liquified the steel to cut through with charges too thick to cut with small amount of Explosives so sure steel was heated and then cut look at my vidio and see plu happy to test plenty more aircraft grade Aluminum just like at your local airport or even flying into your city right now 6061-t6

    Does not just vaporize.

  • The biggest enemies of USA is not only the fanatic Islamic morons that flew in the towers or bombed our embassies, BUT MOST OF ALL, AND MANILY OUR OWN LIBERAL CITIZENS THAT HAVE A DOUBT IN THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT EVEN FOR A MOMENT & AT A TIME LIKE THIS, If SOME liberals continue their betraying attitude towards their own country, they will lose their country to those particular Islamic fanatics, No doubt about that.

  • Dumbass you can't even spell giuliani right, no you Nazi bastards need to die.

  • My name is Robert U. Golani, what the hell are you talking about Are you a dope head?

    Lobster kaka

  • Oh my mistake, I thought you were a Giuliani suporter because he is such a corupted piece of shit beurocrat nazi bastard. So I figured that a skin head like you would love someone like him.

  • All I know about Guliani is that he changed New York to a better place, and brought the crime rate down. I would look at the bright side. The real Nazis are the fanatic Muslims that kill 3000 innocent people to prove their religion rules. Get out of that lobster shell.

  • I would look at the reality that te only one who says Rudy Guiliani lowered crime is Rudy Guilani. Fuck the fanatic muslims, they don't scare me they are no threat, why don't you look at whats happening our economy right now and see who the real threat is ?

  • Question: IF thermite really was used to help bring down the towers on 9/11, would you want that fact revealed? Or should we all help keep it quiet because we are at war?

  • Richrad you are easily brain washed. If you think 9/11 was an inside job, then you are the perfect target for Muslim fanatics.

  • Fine, but the question contained the word "IF" in capitals for emphasis. It's called a hypothetical question, similar to "IF the world were going to end tomorrow, what would you do?"

  • wat happens if i use iron and aluminium filings, lit by Mg ribbon?

  • But if people must insist on the thermite theory, than a likely and plausible senario is that the immense

    amount of aluminum from the aircraft could have easily melted in a jet-A fuel fire (under 1500 deg F),

  • Aluminum is not enough to make thermite. You need about twice as much iron oxide as aluminum and you need both in powdered form.

  • And your point being? You think molten aluminium can bring down a steel building? Not by a long shot.

  • ugh ,he means the someone (either terrorists or the government) used thermite (aluminum + rust) to bring down the twin towers.

    even if the twin tower were brought down by thermite with "sulfate" (he probably means sulfide)in it. it can still be thermite of a

    amateur source.

  • Plus, jet fuel fires burn much much hotter than convertional flames and the convection heating affectes of the fire were amplified by the tower's shape,

     thus it is not unlikely nor uncommon for a jet fuel fire to be able to melt steel.

  • Jet fuel does not melt steel.

  • canola oil can melt steel, so long as it is in an 70% oxygen environment or higher. A candle in pure oxygen can melt aluminum. The ratio of oxygen in the fires of the twin towers was around 85%, and there was jet fuel, not canola oil. The reason there was so much oxygen is because of the chimeny effect of the tower's central elevator shafts, supplying lots and lots of air to the fire very quickly, and into a very small space

  • Our atmosphere is 21% oxygen, not 85%

    Look up "Earth's Atmosphere" in Wikipedia or wherever you like. No matter how fast air is moving, it is still only 21% oxygen. The nitrogen (and other gases) move right along with the oxygen!

  • yes, but the "amount" of oxygen a fire gets is not only dependant upon the ratio of oxygen to other gases in the local atmosphere, but also dependant upon the flow/consumption rate of the gases. Look up "blast furnace" and "bellows" on Wikipedia. Duchebag.

  • YOU were the one who said "The ratio of oxygen in the fires of the twin towers was around 85%"

    YOU said "ratio" not AMOUNT. And it's a DOUCHE bag; learn how to spell it and then go USE it.

  • There was black smoke, which means that the fire didn't have enough oxygen to burn fully. Even with "bellows", hydrocarbon fuels like jetfuel will never burn at these temperatures, you need to use a blast furnace. Blast furnaces are based on high pressurising, and that is not possible under these conditions. The windows would have blown out long before this pressure would've been acchieved and you need a completely sealed space to get pressurisation. Sorry to bring it, but your theory is wrong.

  • The columns didn't need to melt to cause collapse.

  • correct. they only neede to weaken just enough. however, molten steel was found in large quantities, still molten, hours after the collapse occured.

  • Well, molten metal was found. No part of the rubble met the threshold to melt steel.

  • so instead of Iron oxide or Fe(III)O2 and Aluminum, this reaction is Iron(II) and Aluminum oxide. It is possible then that a thermitious type reaction could be responsible for ultimately causing the structural failure of the WTC towers, however, there is no way that a) the terrorists could have known this might occur and planned on this occuring, and b) it is rediculous to think that the terrorists actually brought these chemicals on board the aircraft hoping to cause this reaction.

  • interesting reverse thermite reaction

  • yes it is'nt it?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more