One of the WTC design engineers, Leslie Robertson, had denied that people saw molten steel in the Ground Zero rubble. A video surfaced recently showing that in 2002 he claimed he had seen "a little river of molten steel" himself.
You lie. There are 100s of on the spot eyewitnesses to the wreckage and the human remains. When you deny large bodies of easily available information to promote a theory that has absolutely ZERO evidence to support it, that makes you a liar by omission. In your case, you are among the more radical, spewing several uncorrobarated allegations at a time. You haven't done the slightest bit of research. You are a, typical "truther", world class liar. You got nothing of any value to say, LIAR...bye!
@biggbrattz "There are 100s of on the spot eyewitnesses to the wreckage and the human remains."
Of course there are going to be human remains.But how about the bodies proven to be in 200 seperate pieces(same person) and on roofs of buildings a good distance from the Towers? THAT doesn't happen in a supposed "COLLAPSE." That's sheer nonsense.
typical "truther", world class liar.-THAT in itself is a LIE. Typical truthers have done more research than you closeminded assholes ever did.hahaha
@deltaalpha21074 If you havn't seen the pictures of the pentagon with pieces of what is obviously the remains of an aircraft, it is only because you havn't looked. Those pics are all over the net.
@biggbrattz Sorry to tell you but wasn't to hard for CIA spooks to place scrap crap in that section they hit hard with a missle one that disintegrates with CORDITE ie smokless powder and foll kids like you!
Thermite liquified the steel to cut through with charges too thick to cut with small amount of Explosives so sure steel was heated and then cut look at my vidio and see plu happy to test plenty more aircraft grade Aluminum just like at your local airport or even flying into your city right now 6061-t6
The biggest enemies of USA is not only the fanatic Islamic morons that flew in the towers or bombed our embassies, BUT MOST OF ALL, AND MANILY OUR OWN LIBERAL CITIZENS THAT HAVE A DOUBT IN THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT EVEN FOR A MOMENT & AT A TIME LIKE THIS, If SOME liberals continue their betraying attitude towards their own country, they will lose their country to those particular Islamic fanatics, No doubt about that.
Oh my mistake, I thought you were a Giuliani suporter because he is such a corupted piece of shit beurocrat nazi bastard. So I figured that a skin head like you would love someone like him.
All I know about Guliani is that he changed New York to a better place, and brought the crime rate down. I would look at the bright side. The real Nazis are the fanatic Muslims that kill 3000 innocent people to prove their religion rules. Get out of that lobster shell.
I would look at the reality that te only one who says Rudy Guiliani lowered crime is Rudy Guilani. Fuck the fanatic muslims, they don't scare me they are no threat, why don't you look at whats happening our economy right now and see who the real threat is ?
Question: IF thermite really was used to help bring down the towers on 9/11, would you want that fact revealed? Or should we all help keep it quiet because we are at war?
Fine, but the question contained the word "IF" in capitals for emphasis. It's called a hypothetical question, similar to "IF the world were going to end tomorrow, what would you do?"
Plus, jet fuel fires burn much much hotter than convertional flames and the convection heating affectes of the fire were amplified by the tower's shape,
thus it is not unlikely nor uncommon for a jet fuel fire to be able to melt steel.
canola oil can melt steel, so long as it is in an 70% oxygen environment or higher. A candle in pure oxygen can melt aluminum. The ratio of oxygen in the fires of the twin towers was around 85%, and there was jet fuel, not canola oil. The reason there was so much oxygen is because of the chimeny effect of the tower's central elevator shafts, supplying lots and lots of air to the fire very quickly, and into a very small space
Look up "Earth's Atmosphere" in Wikipedia or wherever you like. No matter how fast air is moving, it is still only 21% oxygen. The nitrogen (and other gases) move right along with the oxygen!
yes, but the "amount" of oxygen a fire gets is not only dependant upon the ratio of oxygen to other gases in the local atmosphere, but also dependant upon the flow/consumption rate of the gases. Look up "blast furnace" and "bellows" on Wikipedia. Duchebag.
There was black smoke, which means that the fire didn't have enough oxygen to burn fully. Even with "bellows", hydrocarbon fuels like jetfuel will never burn at these temperatures, you need to use a blast furnace. Blast furnaces are based on high pressurising, and that is not possible under these conditions. The windows would have blown out long before this pressure would've been acchieved and you need a completely sealed space to get pressurisation. Sorry to bring it, but your theory is wrong.
so instead of Iron oxide or Fe(III)O2 and Aluminum, this reaction is Iron(II) and Aluminum oxide. It is possible then that a thermitious type reaction could be responsible for ultimately causing the structural failure of the WTC towers, however, there is no way that a) the terrorists could have known this might occur and planned on this occuring, and b) it is rediculous to think that the terrorists actually brought these chemicals on board the aircraft hoping to cause this reaction.
This has been flagged as spam show
One of the WTC design engineers, Leslie Robertson, had denied that people saw molten steel in the Ground Zero rubble. A video surfaced recently showing that in 2002 he claimed he had seen "a little river of molten steel" himself.
See my video:
The 9/11 "Deep Mystery" and the Crazy Engineers
punxsutawneybarney 7 months ago
You lie. There are 100s of on the spot eyewitnesses to the wreckage and the human remains. When you deny large bodies of easily available information to promote a theory that has absolutely ZERO evidence to support it, that makes you a liar by omission. In your case, you are among the more radical, spewing several uncorrobarated allegations at a time. You haven't done the slightest bit of research. You are a, typical "truther", world class liar. You got nothing of any value to say, LIAR...bye!
biggbrattz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@biggbrattz "There are 100s of on the spot eyewitnesses to the wreckage and the human remains."
Of course there are going to be human remains.But how about the bodies proven to be in 200 seperate pieces(same person) and on roofs of buildings a good distance from the Towers? THAT doesn't happen in a supposed "COLLAPSE." That's sheer nonsense.
typical "truther", world class liar.-THAT in itself is a LIE. Typical truthers have done more research than you closeminded assholes ever did.hahaha
ed11561 6 months ago
OMG 9/11 BLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLABLA BLA BLA fucking hell...
blahdob 2 years ago
Sorry I think you have a bit too much water in your wooden shoes. Those examples are shape charges. not thermite.
thermite debunked,
search youtube
ySHgiUxnLC0
AWSmith1955 3 years ago
All the shit was hoisted up to those critical floors in Aug and sure those cutting charges were well placed then as well....
deltaalpha21074 3 years ago
Why so many parts of aircraft found at WTC but none at The Pentagon????sounds like BS lots of it.
deltaalpha21074 3 years ago
@deltaalpha21074 If you havn't seen the pictures of the pentagon with pieces of what is obviously the remains of an aircraft, it is only because you havn't looked. Those pics are all over the net.
biggbrattz 1 year ago
@biggbrattz Sorry to tell you but wasn't to hard for CIA spooks to place scrap crap in that section they hit hard with a missle one that disintegrates with CORDITE ie smokless powder and foll kids like you!
deltaalpha21074 1 year ago
Thermite liquified the steel to cut through with charges too thick to cut with small amount of Explosives so sure steel was heated and then cut look at my vidio and see plu happy to test plenty more aircraft grade Aluminum just like at your local airport or even flying into your city right now 6061-t6
Does not just vaporize.
deltaalpha21074 3 years ago
The biggest enemies of USA is not only the fanatic Islamic morons that flew in the towers or bombed our embassies, BUT MOST OF ALL, AND MANILY OUR OWN LIBERAL CITIZENS THAT HAVE A DOUBT IN THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT EVEN FOR A MOMENT & AT A TIME LIKE THIS, If SOME liberals continue their betraying attitude towards their own country, they will lose their country to those particular Islamic fanatics, No doubt about that.
RuGolani 4 years ago
Dumbass you can't even spell giuliani right, no you Nazi bastards need to die.
mindlobster 4 years ago
My name is Robert U. Golani, what the hell are you talking about Are you a dope head?
Lobster kaka
RuGolani 4 years ago
Oh my mistake, I thought you were a Giuliani suporter because he is such a corupted piece of shit beurocrat nazi bastard. So I figured that a skin head like you would love someone like him.
mindlobster 4 years ago
All I know about Guliani is that he changed New York to a better place, and brought the crime rate down. I would look at the bright side. The real Nazis are the fanatic Muslims that kill 3000 innocent people to prove their religion rules. Get out of that lobster shell.
RuGolani 4 years ago
I would look at the reality that te only one who says Rudy Guiliani lowered crime is Rudy Guilani. Fuck the fanatic muslims, they don't scare me they are no threat, why don't you look at whats happening our economy right now and see who the real threat is ?
mindlobster 4 years ago
Question: IF thermite really was used to help bring down the towers on 9/11, would you want that fact revealed? Or should we all help keep it quiet because we are at war?
RichardC111165 4 years ago
Richrad you are easily brain washed. If you think 9/11 was an inside job, then you are the perfect target for Muslim fanatics.
4Tamashah 4 years ago
Fine, but the question contained the word "IF" in capitals for emphasis. It's called a hypothetical question, similar to "IF the world were going to end tomorrow, what would you do?"
RichardC111165 4 years ago 2
wat happens if i use iron and aluminium filings, lit by Mg ribbon?
shinobi31337 4 years ago
But if people must insist on the thermite theory, than a likely and plausible senario is that the immense
amount of aluminum from the aircraft could have easily melted in a jet-A fuel fire (under 1500 deg F),
Mattersmatter 5 years ago
Aluminum is not enough to make thermite. You need about twice as much iron oxide as aluminum and you need both in powdered form.
RichardC111165 4 years ago
And your point being? You think molten aluminium can bring down a steel building? Not by a long shot.
ChronoDensetsu 4 years ago
ugh ,he means the someone (either terrorists or the government) used thermite (aluminum + rust) to bring down the twin towers.
even if the twin tower were brought down by thermite with "sulfate" (he probably means sulfide)in it. it can still be thermite of a
amateur source.
silendshade 4 years ago
Plus, jet fuel fires burn much much hotter than convertional flames and the convection heating affectes of the fire were amplified by the tower's shape,
thus it is not unlikely nor uncommon for a jet fuel fire to be able to melt steel.
Mattersmatter 5 years ago
Jet fuel does not melt steel.
mindlobster 4 years ago
canola oil can melt steel, so long as it is in an 70% oxygen environment or higher. A candle in pure oxygen can melt aluminum. The ratio of oxygen in the fires of the twin towers was around 85%, and there was jet fuel, not canola oil. The reason there was so much oxygen is because of the chimeny effect of the tower's central elevator shafts, supplying lots and lots of air to the fire very quickly, and into a very small space
Mattersmatter 4 years ago
Our atmosphere is 21% oxygen, not 85%
Look up "Earth's Atmosphere" in Wikipedia or wherever you like. No matter how fast air is moving, it is still only 21% oxygen. The nitrogen (and other gases) move right along with the oxygen!
RichardC111165 4 years ago 2
yes, but the "amount" of oxygen a fire gets is not only dependant upon the ratio of oxygen to other gases in the local atmosphere, but also dependant upon the flow/consumption rate of the gases. Look up "blast furnace" and "bellows" on Wikipedia. Duchebag.
Mattersmatter 4 years ago
YOU were the one who said "The ratio of oxygen in the fires of the twin towers was around 85%"
YOU said "ratio" not AMOUNT. And it's a DOUCHE bag; learn how to spell it and then go USE it.
RichardC111165 4 years ago
There was black smoke, which means that the fire didn't have enough oxygen to burn fully. Even with "bellows", hydrocarbon fuels like jetfuel will never burn at these temperatures, you need to use a blast furnace. Blast furnaces are based on high pressurising, and that is not possible under these conditions. The windows would have blown out long before this pressure would've been acchieved and you need a completely sealed space to get pressurisation. Sorry to bring it, but your theory is wrong.
ChronoDensetsu 4 years ago
The columns didn't need to melt to cause collapse.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
correct. they only neede to weaken just enough. however, molten steel was found in large quantities, still molten, hours after the collapse occured.
Mattersmatter 4 years ago
Well, molten metal was found. No part of the rubble met the threshold to melt steel.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
so instead of Iron oxide or Fe(III)O2 and Aluminum, this reaction is Iron(II) and Aluminum oxide. It is possible then that a thermitious type reaction could be responsible for ultimately causing the structural failure of the WTC towers, however, there is no way that a) the terrorists could have known this might occur and planned on this occuring, and b) it is rediculous to think that the terrorists actually brought these chemicals on board the aircraft hoping to cause this reaction.
Mattersmatter 5 years ago
interesting reverse thermite reaction
Mattersmatter 5 years ago
yes it is'nt it?
baroccus 5 years ago