the trouble about russians is there money , cus the ak47 is been there arsenl since 19550 , so cum on , the americans get a assault rife and make a better one 20 yys later or sumthing so wat im saying is the americans can improv more quicker and reserch more than the russians as the russians dont hve the money on there side
over al , emerica tech is btrr thn russians in most expects , they hve more brains , an drussia is good , but dont hve money to resrch anythin , all there tech ow wa spost to come out in the 90s so , theve been cut bck by a allmost 2 decades , and there econom is bulllshit , most of it relyin on oil and natural gas , which they the ol will run out in 20 yrs and this modersation of the armed forces , what are the avtually buyin from it , i dont see any big purchases ,
@smithyboi1000 pathetic, in moron-land, people imagine russian army still in bunch of cosacks shooting uraaaaaa with the AK47 on full auto and covered by T34... Russia uses AK-74 since 1980's, and now uses modernised variants, new rifles and a lot of genius weapons for special forces, i don't see any better thing in USA with the 30 YO M16a2 and crappy M4.
That fuel is intended for road marches and deep strikes. In combat areas those tanks are empty or filled with sand which actually give good protection against heavy MG fire. Of course, BMP isnt a tank. Tanks do not carry infantry around.
Tanks duke it out with enemy tanks, fuck shit up and exploit breaches in enemy lines.
Thats not really the problem. The soviets expected manuever warfare with NATO in europe so they banked on light, fast, cheap and above all amphibious IFV's. They gave decent protection from the front but insufficient on the sides. There have been reports that even 7.62ap can piece some parts of the side armor not to mention the rear. Thats soviet doctrine though, fast, cheap and plentiful and we don't care if you die ;)
yeah except they don't have to load the thing with ammo for the cannon if they don't want to. They still have the 30mm left for offense. I agree though, that its a stupid design. What happened to KISS? No need to load a IFV with a bomb in the form of 90mm ammo. Better put that cost and weight into crew protection from 30mm plus from the front and some sort of reactive armor/stand off cages
The fact that you refer to this as a tank renders your opinion irrelevant american *draws a big "D" on your forehead, puts a dunce hat on you and tells you to go and sit in the corner*.
"Best" is a hard term. It is, however, the only amphibious vehicle of its class, and much faster than its western counterparts. Of course, as this video demonstrates, it is not without it's faults.
u.s troop carrier was only met to protect it's self,in there sceem of thing they need some thing fast and was able to carrie more than the bmp,it will with a duo rockets can protect it's self from a main tank,when u travel as far as u.s army does they can't have a weapon that does everthing they have it got the room. but i wish they make a copy or better one!
@vollirik You know where the gas tanks are on a BMP? Between the passengers and safety. Good luck if you get hit in the rear. I've been in both Soviet designed vehicles and American designed vehicles. I choose American.
@vollirik Your Estonian brethren who served with me in Afghanistan preferred American vehicles. But I'm sure you're right. I'm also sure you would choose a T-72 over and M1A1. Ask the Iraqis how that fight turns out.
@vollirik No it isn't and you know it bub! First the BMP1 is inferior to the M2A2 Bradley IFV! The BMP-2 has only one that that is slightly better then the Bradley..... a 30mm gun! But that is it.... it still has design flaws where a 50 cal round can damage the sides and the rear of both BMP 1 & 2! And did you bother to tell your buddies that those two budging doors in the back are NOT Armor Plated but two diesel fuel tanks! Nasty place to get Hit!
the trouble about russians is there money , cus the ak47 is been there arsenl since 19550 , so cum on , the americans get a assault rife and make a better one 20 yys later or sumthing so wat im saying is the americans can improv more quicker and reserch more than the russians as the russians dont hve the money on there side
smithyboi1000 1 year ago
@smithyboi1000 , the Nazis had also better weapon in 1941...What could they do? Nothing...
Skylinegtr34ful 1 year ago
over al , emerica tech is btrr thn russians in most expects , they hve more brains , an drussia is good , but dont hve money to resrch anythin , all there tech ow wa spost to come out in the 90s so , theve been cut bck by a allmost 2 decades , and there econom is bulllshit , most of it relyin on oil and natural gas , which they the ol will run out in 20 yrs and this modersation of the armed forces , what are the avtually buyin from it , i dont see any big purchases ,
smithyboi1000 1 year ago
@smithyboi1000 pathetic, in moron-land, people imagine russian army still in bunch of cosacks shooting uraaaaaa with the AK47 on full auto and covered by T34... Russia uses AK-74 since 1980's, and now uses modernised variants, new rifles and a lot of genius weapons for special forces, i don't see any better thing in USA with the 30 YO M16a2 and crappy M4.
PATRONSKiii 7 months ago
i love this old beast :)))) it has a soul.
Warpedtank 2 years ago 3
And the best og this crppy tank is that the thick doors at the back contains fuel... not extra armour
panzerkeiko 2 years ago
That fuel is intended for road marches and deep strikes. In combat areas those tanks are empty or filled with sand which actually give good protection against heavy MG fire. Of course, BMP isnt a tank. Tanks do not carry infantry around.
Tanks duke it out with enemy tanks, fuck shit up and exploit breaches in enemy lines.
Kommarikakka 2 years ago 2
Thats not really the problem. The soviets expected manuever warfare with NATO in europe so they banked on light, fast, cheap and above all amphibious IFV's. They gave decent protection from the front but insufficient on the sides. There have been reports that even 7.62ap can piece some parts of the side armor not to mention the rear. Thats soviet doctrine though, fast, cheap and plentiful and we don't care if you die ;)
gosciu555 2 years ago 5
One 12.7mm tracer round - BBQ'd mech infantry
Hairysteed 2 years ago
yeah except they don't have to load the thing with ammo for the cannon if they don't want to. They still have the 30mm left for offense. I agree though, that its a stupid design. What happened to KISS? No need to load a IFV with a bomb in the form of 90mm ammo. Better put that cost and weight into crew protection from 30mm plus from the front and some sort of reactive armor/stand off cages
gosciu555 2 years ago
BMP-3 doesn't have them on the rear door anymore.
Goodspittin 2 years ago
The fact that you refer to this as a tank renders your opinion irrelevant american *draws a big "D" on your forehead, puts a dunce hat on you and tells you to go and sit in the corner*.
vodkasvictim 2 years ago
its not a tank its a ifv
aag005 2 years ago
I wish this was subtitled! My friend tried to teach me Russian but we were drunk, too much wodka...
cra83 3 years ago 6
hehehe
bittemeinrammstein 3 years ago
yeah, maybe a drunk Russian isn't the best teacher for a drunk Englishman ;)
cra83 3 years ago
Whats worse is a drunk Russian talkign with a drunk Irishman I should think lol.
looneychicken 2 years ago
haha, im half irish.... Needless to say, we gave up....
cra83 2 years ago
Lol, a third Irish here. Wonder why you gave up lol. Aint forgein languages easiest to learn/teach while drunk?
looneychicken 2 years ago
nah, my Estonian-born mate was trying to teach me the russian fror ''to our friend's health'' and i kept saying it in polish. She wasnt happy! haha
cra83 2 years ago
the BMP ,much better than the Marder or that cube carrier of the yanks
toulon33480399 3 years ago 7
i wanna have a bmp-2!:D
megakoko123 3 years ago 11
Man!!! I whish, this was in english, spanish or italian!!! Crap! I love these russian documentries!
NicolazDamian 4 years ago 19
me to,bmp is the best in it's class(only in it's class) wish the u.s make some of this type with a big cannon and a 30mm ect ect
Conservativepacheat 3 years ago
"Best" is a hard term. It is, however, the only amphibious vehicle of its class, and much faster than its western counterparts. Of course, as this video demonstrates, it is not without it's faults.
MarkSynthesis 2 years ago
BMPs have serious armor protection issues.
BattleT3chvx 2 years ago 2
Nice Vid, too bad that is in russian... this vid reminds me Operation Flashpoint :P
billlydark 4 years ago 9
yeah, but those bmps and 113s were deathtraps in that game. Nobody EVER missed with a LAW or an RPG.
You were safer outside of the APC then you were inside of it.
russcarljohnson 4 years ago 5
Same goes for real life, id NEVER feel safe in russian armour. T-90 included it looks cramped as hell
poonjoo 4 years ago
But BMP-2\3 is still better than any american troops' carrier.
And you'll be idiot feeling yourself safe in fight. :)
vollirik 3 years ago 15
u.s troop carrier was only met to protect it's self,in there sceem of thing they need some thing fast and was able to carrie more than the bmp,it will with a duo rockets can protect it's self from a main tank,when u travel as far as u.s army does they can't have a weapon that does everthing they have it got the room. but i wish they make a copy or better one!
Conservativepacheat 3 years ago
@vollirik You know where the gas tanks are on a BMP? Between the passengers and safety. Good luck if you get hit in the rear. I've been in both Soviet designed vehicles and American designed vehicles. I choose American.
ProfessorMatthew 1 year ago
@vollirik Your Estonian brethren who served with me in Afghanistan preferred American vehicles. But I'm sure you're right. I'm also sure you would choose a T-72 over and M1A1. Ask the Iraqis how that fight turns out.
ProfessorMatthew 1 year ago
@vollirik No it isn't and you know it bub! First the BMP1 is inferior to the M2A2 Bradley IFV! The BMP-2 has only one that that is slightly better then the Bradley..... a 30mm gun! But that is it.... it still has design flaws where a 50 cal round can damage the sides and the rear of both BMP 1 & 2! And did you bother to tell your buddies that those two budging doors in the back are NOT Armor Plated but two diesel fuel tanks! Nasty place to get Hit!
11B30Inf 5 months ago
It is said on the field of battle a infantryman is a 0 and a tank is a 1. Put them together and you get a 10.
People just used the vehicles wrong in that game. The massive explosions of tanks also contributed to the fact.
ytbentrlldkt 3 years ago
can i find this i english.??
sharpshiell 4 years ago
My good nice BMP!
GerojSlav 4 years ago 11
Vojennoje delo RULEZZZ
WolfSLAV 5 years ago 2
I want that program in my TV!!!
GerojSlav 5 years ago 8
"They dont need weapons if they can use the enemy's weakness!"
W.Schwebel
Gromoslawski 5 years ago 5