I wonder how much weight a BRS system takes up on the typical small airplane. Seriously, it'd be nice to see equipment like this on more single-engine aircraft--old or new. Trainers especially. Force landings are nice in the event of an engine failure (eh, sort of), but losing an engine at night, clipping something like a bird, or having pieces of the aircraft fall off (i.e., wings) means that the pilot is screwed without equipment like this.
@bc1560 you clearly have no knowledge in aviation. No plane is made for its wind to fall off. Clearly he was pushing this aircraft to the limit, and stressed the airframe.
If a 747 had a BRS, where would the plane land without breaking up on impact? An airport? Even then, wouldn't a horizontal landing be safer than a vertical landing?
Personally I'd like to avoid the spinal injuries that often come with ejections... This chute looks a lot less impressive, but I'm sure it's a lot gentler on the pilot as well.
@BrunoDaKeeper lol. did you ever see boeing 747 or airbus 330 ? how big the chute would have to be ? Besides, plane crashes usually don't happen due to lost wing and any BRS would not help you when something happens on landing...
There is a correction to be made to this video. THe pilot is one of the Hangar del Cielo civilian acrobatic team and the aircraft is a RANS S10 SAKOTA not a S9 CHAOS. It differs especially because the S10 is a 2 seater. Please check you source and thanks for the video.
it is neither practical nor feasable to put a recovery chute on an airliner ,do u know how big the chute would have to be how much it would weigh .....think about it
It's about time we saw a video where a plane breaks in flight and the pilot walks away anyway. This is what technology is supposed to do for us. The BRS Recovery Chute is by far one of the best innovations of the century.
@fairhillnorrie They landed with a large chute in a capsule no larger than your bathroom and in a planned manner not a crash? I'm not sure how those mean that a jumbo jet parachute is a great plan. I wasn't questioning whether parachutes work
AF1 does not, in fact, have a parachute. It's safe because it's an established safe model that's worked over on an intense maintenance schedule.
Flying is 8 times safer per-mile than your fat ass driving to work, not sure what you're complaining about
I can't get excited about a pilot doing acrobatics using a kit built aircraft and being surprised that the wing falls off. Let's drive a Chevy into a brick wall and test the airbag to make sure it works
@ArtStone the Pitts Special started out as a homebuilt and many are still built as homebuilts from plans. Many aerobatic aircraft on the airshow circuit are homebuilts. If you did some research you would discover that many homebuilts are made to a standard far superior to the average factory aircraft.
@fairhillnorrie Not many, unfortunately. The vast, vast majority of jumbo jet failures are due to catastrophic failure and are nearly always during takeoff and landing, times at which a parachute would not be effective.
Commercial airliners are built to be far, far more redundant than your average hobby plane. I can't offhand think of any major airliner disaster that would've been averted or helped by an onboard chute...and doubt one is even technically feasible for an aircraft of that size.
@holycrapifoundthem where do you get your information? the majority of most airline crashes are pilot error or weather or a combination of both. I can list several airline incidents that would have been averted if there was a chute system, this is obviously academic as there is no such system.
@unapro3 Yes, my primary point was that it's neither feasible nor helpful to chute down a 747. And sure, name those incidents; I'd love to hear them. I don't know what pilot error has to do with this...of course that's the top cause...it does not mean you can deploy a chute, or that doing so would be helpful. My information comes from a lifetime in aviation and one of the heads of Rockwell Collins, who designs the majority (all at this point? Save the 777?) of your aircraft safety systems.
@holycrapifoundthem he he, a lifetime in aviation? your only 29!! Iam an A&P/Pilot and have beeen in the aviation industry before you were born. I mentioned pilot error because you said the majority of 747 failures were catastrophic. The DC9 that lost all hydraulics, the DC9 that lost all elevator control, the DC10 that had a mid air and lost tailplane, 757 that went into spin, 747 that had rear press bulkhead failure, 707 mid air, 1900 aft C of G, 707 in flat spin, ther are heaps.
@unapro3 I think 30 years counts. I've been spoonfed aviation disaster stories since I was 4. If you're a pilot I'm surprised you think deploying a chute in a spin is a good idea. JAL 123 is about the one that I find convincing there. Anyhow I didn't mean to suggest that it would never help, but there certainly are not "heaps" where the airliner was stable enough to deploy a chute but lacked other, better options. It's hardly the "oh this is so obvious" solution earlier posters were assuming
Wow. That was a beautiful "landing". I'm sure the pilot preferred it to the other option, which would have been very messy. I've seen the kits available for small aircraft for years, but this is the first video I've seen of one being used in a real-world situation.
This is perfect example of the value of these recovery systems. It was nice to see that a U.S. Insurance company call Aggressive Aviation actually gives a credit to planes that are equipped with this kind of safety equipment.
That appears to me to be a piece of debris that came off the airplane when the BRS was deployed. Also, the BRS system is designed to rescue the plane with you still in it, secured to your seats with the restraint system in the plane. This is usually a whole lot safer than the pilot bailing out himself because the impact of the landing goes directly onto the planes under fuselage.
those who know better correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears to me that the pilot ejects at 0:25, no? what's the red thing off to the left? a part of the fuselage or another chute? even with a BRS why would the pilot not eject anyway, which would be much safer than hitting the ground with a plane on top of you.
@dsomary the "red thing" is part of the BRS system and is attached to the rocket that ensures rapid deployment of the 'chute. As stearman81n mentioned, the 'chute is normally attached to the airframe such that it would bring the plane down on its gear. In this case, it does appear that the lines were wrapped around the rear fuselage as the aircraft spun. He could have flown with his own 'chute, but at some point you must decide how much redundancy is enough.
Look very closely as the aircraft descends under canopy and you can see Moline rapidly moving both the rudder and elevator back and forth. That may *pure speculation* indicate his attempt to free the lines, but there may be other reasons. Due to the speed of the roll, it's not clear that Moline would have been able to cleanly escape the aircraft. It can also take more time for non-ballistic 'chutes to open. A normal parachute might not have fully deployed before he hit the ground.
I'm building the 2 place version of this airplane. The BRS harness is designed to break out around the canopy and suspend from 4 points to the lanyard or extension... providing a wheels-down descent. In this case, it appears that the lanyard wrapped around the tail during deployment. Luckily it was propelled clear of the aircraft during the violent spin.
...and for you gamers out there who insist this is faked somehow? You really should try the real world sometime, it'll blow your mind.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
You can totally see the wires. Also around 0:55 the "missing" wing reappears for a couple of frames. And planes don't have parachutes and so this is totally fake.
@doisdjoai You should know that those guys are world famous with theyr airshow on Rans airplanes - which are all equipped with ballistic recovery systmes. Cesar, the teamleader himself also recovered from an accident in this way some years before.
@UnitedTulips But the parachutes only work well with light aircrafts and can not be used on faster or heavier planes, or else the parachute would tear apart.
Great pilot? How much skill does it take to pull a handle? No offence but doing those maneuvers on a homebuilt is risky at best. I surely wouldn't do low altitude maneuvers like that unless I was in an Extra or MX2. The story of a cocky young pilot if anything who was lucky to have a parachute.
I'm amazed by the reaction time of this pilot... barely one second goes by from the wing snapping, to the time the chute begins to deploy... great reflexes and not wasting time trying to recover the airplane like some pilots do and then don't have the altitude to deploy the BRS or bailing out... quick thinking...
Such an amazing and simple solution god these need to be in all aircraft
MrRednijlad 2 days ago
Wow. Trays amazing. Every plane should be equipped with that. Definitely would have been killed.
MILLERS066 2 weeks ago
My name is Abramovich. I have this one in my Boeing.
Mykola40 2 months ago
you would think 'fixed wing' would have 2 meanings
NZsquadron 2 months ago
A guy landed an F-15 with 1 wing.
Aviation2001 3 months ago
USA COMPONENTS ......... -.-
ArGames11 3 months ago
@ArGames11 That plane was not made to withstand maneuvers like that more like a bad pilot not bad components
Spitzenhund 1 month ago
@Spitzenhund ok , sorry,, but this is important " he is a live :) "
ArGames11 1 month ago
Can you pull the ripcord while you shit your pants or do you shit first, then pull?
SoCalDualSport 3 months ago
Hmm.... Someone didn't do preflight...
Uunster 4 months ago
Lucky the pilot had a poopchute!
thr33wisemonks 4 months ago
Good vid. BRS deserves every kudo, award, and accolade that comes their way.
ThinkingManNeil 4 months ago
I wonder how much weight a BRS system takes up on the typical small airplane. Seriously, it'd be nice to see equipment like this on more single-engine aircraft--old or new. Trainers especially. Force landings are nice in the event of an engine failure (eh, sort of), but losing an engine at night, clipping something like a bird, or having pieces of the aircraft fall off (i.e., wings) means that the pilot is screwed without equipment like this.
RocketBird120 4 months ago
@RocketBird120
The weight from the BRS is 8 to 10kg (include fixings), 12kg for a 2 places ultralight 472kg class (the Chaos is registered as ultralight in Europe)
leneanderthalien 3 weeks ago
What size canopy is that? It brings the plane down very nicely.
Freeflyer91 5 months ago
WOW!
Seigu007 5 months ago
So are they making enormous BRS's for full sized passanger plains?
Dexxxter7780 6 months ago
Wouldn't it be safer to just have a plane that's wings didn't just fall off???
bc1560 7 months ago 8
@bc1560 you clearly have no knowledge in aviation. No plane is made for its wind to fall off. Clearly he was pushing this aircraft to the limit, and stressed the airframe.
TheParsonsRS 1 month ago
@countrytownman I'm not even going to say it.
antimattercrusader 7 months ago
he lost his freebag
beardedswine 7 months ago
great system
albedran2 8 months ago
It would be nice if they could attach large massive parachutes on passenger plans
Reeseycup79 8 months ago
If a 747 had a BRS, where would the plane land without breaking up on impact? An airport? Even then, wouldn't a horizontal landing be safer than a vertical landing?
zimtower 9 months ago
Superb stuff.
GrimlyKK 10 months ago
Okay, that's it. I'm definately having one on my potential future homebuilt aircraft.
Tjita1 10 months ago
recovery chute? naaawwwww, i'll take a fighter jet ejection seat ANY day
bkboy747 10 months ago
@bkboy747
Personally I'd like to avoid the spinal injuries that often come with ejections... This chute looks a lot less impressive, but I'm sure it's a lot gentler on the pilot as well.
FinallyAUniqueName 9 months ago
Incredible, just thinking he would've died without this... Shocking.
Fucklesticks 10 months ago
THIS IS AWESOME ........
truck501 10 months ago
He was pushing that S-9 well beyond light aerobatic specs the plane was designed for.
parkert51 10 months ago
Okay he is so crazy. I know if i did that I would be pooped after.(-=
nancycucesharp 11 months ago
I can't imagine this pilot would have been able to jump out while spinning at this incredible rate, and use a personal parachute in time to not die.
Good job! BRS
videos like this are the best advertising you can get.
jwboll 11 months ago
faa, make t his mandatory in all GA planes!
freebird20002012 11 months ago
Very nice this airplane.
Aeronautapobre 11 months ago
yay shes okay!
Obzy666 1 year ago
I hope there put this on all flight school Cessna soon:)
iryan74656 1 year ago
Whatever that pilot paid for the system, it was worth it!
joesmoe71 1 year ago
someone know where can I buy this sistem?
I need it for a personal project...thanks
sukerjumps 1 year ago
WHY IS THIS NOT ON ALL PLANES????????????????
BrunoDaKeeper 1 year ago
@BrunoDaKeeper lol. did you ever see boeing 747 or airbus 330 ? how big the chute would have to be ? Besides, plane crashes usually don't happen due to lost wing and any BRS would not help you when something happens on landing...
IngMonkey 11 months ago
There is a correction to be made to this video. THe pilot is one of the Hangar del Cielo civilian acrobatic team and the aircraft is a RANS S10 SAKOTA not a S9 CHAOS. It differs especially because the S10 is a 2 seater. Please check you source and thanks for the video.
GitoAtom 1 year ago
amazing piloting
Louisthefish23 1 year ago
it is neither practical nor feasable to put a recovery chute on an airliner ,do u know how big the chute would have to be how much it would weigh .....think about it
tug82 1 year ago
I think it's always a good idea to have a ballistic chute...., you never know!
HOBBYWIRELESS 1 year ago
Sadly another example of pilot error. You don't do unlimited high-g aerobatics in a sportsman class airplane.
Chute worked well though, technology makes a nice save of bad human decision-making!
ecktoeman 1 year ago
It's about time we saw a video where a plane breaks in flight and the pilot walks away anyway. This is what technology is supposed to do for us. The BRS Recovery Chute is by far one of the best innovations of the century.
SenorSpode 1 year ago 28
This has been flagged as spam show
WOWOOOOOOOOOO AWESOME . I LIKE B R S VARY MUCH HE SAVE PILOT LIFE HUNDRED%. ONE THING IS THAT ALLAH GOD SAVE HIS LIFE. KEEP SAFE FLYING...
qazibrother 1 year ago
WOWOOOOOOOOOO AWESOME . I LIKE B R S VARY MUCH HE SAVE PILOT LIFE HUNDRED%. ONE THING IS THAT ALLAH GOD SAVE HIS LIFE. KEEP SAFE FLYING...
qazibrother 1 year ago
@qazibrother so what about the thousands of other pilots that have died over the years, Allah didn't like them???
unapro3 1 year ago
@unapro3 we want Chang our mind.ALLAH know every thing.
qazibrother 1 year ago
This is why I would never fly my Weedhopper without a BRS.
ozarkmac 1 year ago
he damn lucky @@
LengendYih 1 year ago
this is an amazing idea, but what would happen if the plane started burning while it was still going down?
It seems like this is a life saving device, but could also turn the plane into a burning coffin for the pilot/passengers.
Although I guess its between that or crashing and dying
samson9757 1 year ago
@samson9757 i guess its a better chance than plummeting to the ground and dying for sure.
straighttailpilot 1 year ago
@fairhillnorrie They landed with a large chute in a capsule no larger than your bathroom and in a planned manner not a crash? I'm not sure how those mean that a jumbo jet parachute is a great plan. I wasn't questioning whether parachutes work
AF1 does not, in fact, have a parachute. It's safe because it's an established safe model that's worked over on an intense maintenance schedule.
Flying is 8 times safer per-mile than your fat ass driving to work, not sure what you're complaining about
holycrapifoundthem 1 year ago
Great life saving piece of equipment, respect is due.
Wonkabar007 1 year ago
I guess Bill Hempel wasn't flying it.. :)
wd4jkh 1 year ago
Well done, BRS!
mjkobb 1 year ago
@josip33 hahahaha
charliebad 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
fake
charliebad 1 year ago
Imagine a jumbo jet on parachutes. LOL!
Blitz4000 1 year ago
OMG THAT 1 REALLY HURTED ME!YAYX
BoyTheCute 1 year ago
Nice! now if they could only invent parachutes for airlines, it'd be a 'good' invention.
Ghostmooner 1 year ago
lucky hes not dead
collegeboy760 1 year ago
no comment
bennv5909h 1 year ago
@bennv5909h lol you said no comment but you leaved a comment
BoyTheCute 1 year ago
@BoyTheCute
lol you said ''leaved'' its called left.
Ethanerkul 1 year ago
@Ethanerkul xD!sry!^^'
BoyTheCute 1 year ago
@BoyTheCute
Its ok! :P
I'm surprised you replied with a posetive answer, most people wont do that.
Good job! :)
Ethanerkul 1 year ago
@Ethanerkul :) thanks!
BoyTheCute 1 year ago
@Ethanerkul lol you said "posetive" its called positive.
unapro3 1 year ago
ITS THE RIGHT WING
desertneedle1 1 year ago
@desertneedle1
LOL!
EwBriii 1 year ago
@desertneedle1 he tricked you... he was upside down!
jwboll 11 months ago
I can't get excited about a pilot doing acrobatics using a kit built aircraft and being surprised that the wing falls off. Let's drive a Chevy into a brick wall and test the airbag to make sure it works
ArtStone 1 year ago
@ArtStone the Pitts Special started out as a homebuilt and many are still built as homebuilts from plans. Many aerobatic aircraft on the airshow circuit are homebuilts. If you did some research you would discover that many homebuilts are made to a standard far superior to the average factory aircraft.
unapro3 1 year ago
@fairhillnorrie
lol no, just watch my videos ;-)
0815tobey 1 year ago
Oh never mind. lomcevacks! Crazy
traffety 1 year ago
What was that maneuver called again?
traffety 1 year ago
flash2:P A N I C
diablitodude 1 year ago
Now if the army would put a system like this on the top of the rotor mast of our helicopters...
raulrusboy 1 year ago
@fairhillnorrie Not many, unfortunately. The vast, vast majority of jumbo jet failures are due to catastrophic failure and are nearly always during takeoff and landing, times at which a parachute would not be effective.
Commercial airliners are built to be far, far more redundant than your average hobby plane. I can't offhand think of any major airliner disaster that would've been averted or helped by an onboard chute...and doubt one is even technically feasible for an aircraft of that size.
holycrapifoundthem 1 year ago
@holycrapifoundthem where do you get your information? the majority of most airline crashes are pilot error or weather or a combination of both. I can list several airline incidents that would have been averted if there was a chute system, this is obviously academic as there is no such system.
unapro3 1 year ago
@unapro3 Yes, my primary point was that it's neither feasible nor helpful to chute down a 747. And sure, name those incidents; I'd love to hear them. I don't know what pilot error has to do with this...of course that's the top cause...it does not mean you can deploy a chute, or that doing so would be helpful. My information comes from a lifetime in aviation and one of the heads of Rockwell Collins, who designs the majority (all at this point? Save the 777?) of your aircraft safety systems.
holycrapifoundthem 1 year ago
@holycrapifoundthem he he, a lifetime in aviation? your only 29!! Iam an A&P/Pilot and have beeen in the aviation industry before you were born. I mentioned pilot error because you said the majority of 747 failures were catastrophic. The DC9 that lost all hydraulics, the DC9 that lost all elevator control, the DC10 that had a mid air and lost tailplane, 757 that went into spin, 747 that had rear press bulkhead failure, 707 mid air, 1900 aft C of G, 707 in flat spin, ther are heaps.
unapro3 1 year ago
@unapro3 I think 30 years counts. I've been spoonfed aviation disaster stories since I was 4. If you're a pilot I'm surprised you think deploying a chute in a spin is a good idea. JAL 123 is about the one that I find convincing there. Anyhow I didn't mean to suggest that it would never help, but there certainly are not "heaps" where the airliner was stable enough to deploy a chute but lacked other, better options. It's hardly the "oh this is so obvious" solution earlier posters were assuming
holycrapifoundthem 1 year ago
@unapro3 The new Cessna Skycatcher was twice saved by a ballistic chute although I think one time the Pilot had to jump as the chute was ineffective.
jizzmonger 1 year ago
@jizzmonger Yeah, on one of the saves from this parachute system, the plane was more damaged by being dragged along the ground after touchdown.
Lakotahope 1 year ago
Wow. That was a beautiful "landing". I'm sure the pilot preferred it to the other option, which would have been very messy. I've seen the kits available for small aircraft for years, but this is the first video I've seen of one being used in a real-world situation.
JWSmythe 1 year ago
god damn hater go to hell
EXTREMRAPIST 1 year ago
Good save!
Sittingduck30 1 year ago
Creative use of the word "land"
CandygramMongo 1 year ago
This is perfect example of the value of these recovery systems. It was nice to see that a U.S. Insurance company call Aggressive Aviation actually gives a credit to planes that are equipped with this kind of safety equipment.
montyberrigan 1 year ago
That appears to me to be a piece of debris that came off the airplane when the BRS was deployed. Also, the BRS system is designed to rescue the plane with you still in it, secured to your seats with the restraint system in the plane. This is usually a whole lot safer than the pilot bailing out himself because the impact of the landing goes directly onto the planes under fuselage.
trikeboywonder 1 year ago
Just saw it on sky news, its definitely real.
JaSheen89 1 year ago
do a barrel roll
BYMYSYD 1 year ago
those who know better correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears to me that the pilot ejects at 0:25, no? what's the red thing off to the left? a part of the fuselage or another chute? even with a BRS why would the pilot not eject anyway, which would be much safer than hitting the ground with a plane on top of you.
dsomary 1 year ago
@dsomary the "red thing" is part of the BRS system and is attached to the rocket that ensures rapid deployment of the 'chute. As stearman81n mentioned, the 'chute is normally attached to the airframe such that it would bring the plane down on its gear. In this case, it does appear that the lines were wrapped around the rear fuselage as the aircraft spun. He could have flown with his own 'chute, but at some point you must decide how much redundancy is enough.
AVweb 1 year ago 5
Look very closely as the aircraft descends under canopy and you can see Moline rapidly moving both the rudder and elevator back and forth. That may *pure speculation* indicate his attempt to free the lines, but there may be other reasons. Due to the speed of the roll, it's not clear that Moline would have been able to cleanly escape the aircraft. It can also take more time for non-ballistic 'chutes to open. A normal parachute might not have fully deployed before he hit the ground.
AVweb 1 year ago 4
@dsomary i saw that!
TWCjon 1 year ago
@dsomary yes it does
tgbrfv38 8 months ago
I'm building the 2 place version of this airplane. The BRS harness is designed to break out around the canopy and suspend from 4 points to the lanyard or extension... providing a wheels-down descent. In this case, it appears that the lanyard wrapped around the tail during deployment. Luckily it was propelled clear of the aircraft during the violent spin.
...and for you gamers out there who insist this is faked somehow? You really should try the real world sometime, it'll blow your mind.
stearman81n 1 year ago
Someone just made a lot of money putin a chute on a plane. Simple and very effective! obviously!!!
gavin53uc 1 year ago
This is a true story, i've just heard it in the news
MangaManifaction 1 year ago
ABOUT FUCKING TIME SOMEONE DOES THIS TO A PLAIN...SMART
greencard 1 year ago
@greencard
the emergency parachute it´s being on the market over 10 years
tulaconalas 1 year ago
boeing n airbus shld install these on their planes.
mojorossi 1 year ago
and this is the CONTINUE word flashes on the screen with a count down from 15.
6V92TA 1 year ago
yalls narrator is gooood
sandberg420 1 year ago
HE CHEATED, HE USED A PARACHUUTE lol
drum2survive 1 year ago
@drum2survive lol!!!
6V92TA 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You can totally see the wires. Also around 0:55 the "missing" wing reappears for a couple of frames. And planes don't have parachutes and so this is totally fake.
doisdjoai 1 year ago
@doisdjoai If I might ask, where do you buy your LSD?
CatsAreGods 1 year ago 2
@doisdjoai You should know that those guys are world famous with theyr airshow on Rans airplanes - which are all equipped with ballistic recovery systmes. Cesar, the teamleader himself also recovered from an accident in this way some years before.
surely - no fake!
ls8xs 1 year ago
@doisdjoai
You cant photo shop a video dipshit.
For fucks sake im tired of all these adults acting like they know what there talking about. FUCKING ADMIT IT, YOUR FUCKING OLD SHIT.
Now stop making fucking fools of yourself and actually learn what the fuck photoshop is
MrXaborus 1 year ago
this makes so much more sense than ejecting the pilots seat! the pilot and the plane is saved, and for a much cheaper price too I assume
UnitedTulips 1 year ago
@UnitedTulips But the parachutes only work well with light aircrafts and can not be used on faster or heavier planes, or else the parachute would tear apart.
guambombboy 1 year ago
they should have used this on 911
STICKYPOOSALAD 1 year ago
so fake.
ThinkerMister11 1 year ago
@ThinkerMister11 FUCK YOU! its real, research the company and the event before posting shit like this... they have saved many live with this system
wcc963 1 year ago
that was pretty cool i gota say
cheapo911 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fake. Totally photoshopped.
doisdjoai 1 year ago
@doisdjoai moron.
shiluugei23 1 year ago
@doisdjoai Your a total dipshit fuckhead. Jump off a fucking bridge asswipe
ismasamov55 1 year ago
kinda makes ya wonder why it took 100 years of flight before anyone ever thought of commercializing parachutes for planes... hmmm duh!
ElCidCampeador8 1 year ago
@ElCidCampeador8 More like the technology wasn't safe enough or ready yet...you must realize, you're storing explosives on an aircraft...
CatsAreGods 1 year ago
THIS PILOT WON THE GAME!
thegamelostit 1 year ago
Awesome system
ZerozPk 1 year ago
fabulous, I wish they all had chutes
redhot916spd 1 year ago
its great a 22 year old survived to live the rest of his life!!!!!!!11
FlyHighRC386 1 year ago
This is the result of a great workout and a great pilot!
Note 10.
Andersoniub94 1 year ago
@Andersoniub94 it does take a special pilot to pull a handle lol,
FlyHighRC386 1 year ago
@Andersoniub94
Great pilot? How much skill does it take to pull a handle? No offence but doing those maneuvers on a homebuilt is risky at best. I surely wouldn't do low altitude maneuvers like that unless I was in an Extra or MX2. The story of a cocky young pilot if anything who was lucky to have a parachute.
HDaviator 1 year ago
@HDaviator do some research on homebuilts before commenting.
unapro3 1 year ago
this is the news report of channel 13.
you will see the remains of the burned plane
(Y) watch?v=sLY7LghTeB8
chaconero 1 year ago
I'm amazed by the reaction time of this pilot... barely one second goes by from the wing snapping, to the time the chute begins to deploy... great reflexes and not wasting time trying to recover the airplane like some pilots do and then don't have the altitude to deploy the BRS or bailing out... quick thinking...
RodMafud 1 year ago
Not a model plane, real aerobatic plane with a pilot inside.
And for moyohtg, it's BRS Aerospace, I believe. At least, they're the ones who make most of the systems I've heard of.
Fordan 1 year ago
That's a model plane?
baloneyjazz 1 year ago
wow, incredible
aviationpolska 1 year ago
This is not luck, its a great, concentrate pilot!!! Grande pibe sos un campeón!!Saludos...y gracias por compartir este video tan impresionante!!!
martinba77 1 year ago
oh yeah, kids now a days have to have two wings to land.
DavZZee 1 year ago
@DavZZee ... how funny ... pfff
charlieechovictor 1 year ago
Can anyone tell me the producing company of these BRS-Systems??
moyohtg 1 year ago
@moyohtg google is your friend
unapro3 1 year ago
That was awesome. Although, for a second I thought he was going to knife edge the plane to the runway, but a parachute works too :P
RoboTekno 1 year ago
Dam, that kid is pretty lucky...
philipnewmannz 1 year ago
lucky luke
poerik 1 year ago
Amazing system, it's great to see this had a positive outcome.
idontcare80 1 year ago 2
I land all the time with only one wing ;-)
0815tobey 1 year ago
wow, lucky guy.
rauviz 1 year ago