where is the evidence it came over night..... hmm bullshit on crop circles.. why not do it on a landmark why allways out of sight... its a load fo crap.. sorry to dissapoint u all but its callled video editing.. wheather that is on the date of recording.. its quite easy to do
i disagree scientists and researchers have attempted to remake these circles but they found it is impossible to make them as complex as they are and do it in such a short period of time...im not sayin i believe they are from aliens i just dont no
You can doubt all you want! It wont change the fact that I have and it wont change the fact that ALL of them are man made. The ONLY difference between any crop circle is the skill level of the people making them, some people have more talent than others. The large, very complex circles are made by more talented and skilled makers like myself, the smaller ones are made by people who are new at it and have less talent and skill. They are all man made, that is all there is to it.
Who told you there are "impossible geometric shapes"? It's very obvious that they are not impossible because they are there! Who told you the stocks are bent by "accelerated growth"? That is absolutely HILARIOUS! I cant believe people actually fall for those myths without even one independant lab report, not one! Believers refuse to even ask the people who tell them these ridiculous claims how they came about these claims! I am so glad I grew up asking questions and not falling for myth!
"..suggested that these flattened circles were the result of "some cyclonic wind action" and enclosed a sketch of the "most perfect" of these circles which, unfortunately, Nature did not publish..."
You copied and pasted some silly claims without even checking the source! That is funny! If you had checked the sources of your claims you would have realised that not one of these individuals have ever done any lab work, they simply make up a story and sell it to naive and gullible people. It's astonishing that there are still a few people who haven't the common sense to even ask those idiots to show them a copy of a lab report or even the name of a lab! It's hilarious but sad at the same time
The physical changes (listed below) documented in crop circle plants by Michigan biophysicist W.C. Levengood have been determined by evaluating hundreds of sample plants -- both downed and standing -- taken from inside the overall perimeter of each formation against hundreds of control plants taken at varying distances outside each formation, in several directions.More than 250 individual crop formations from multiple countries, over a 10-year period were examined in-depth.
WC levengood was BLT's lead "scientist", that is until it was discovered that he lied! He even lied about being a PhD, he claimed he "could be one f he wanted to", He also admitted he did no lab work to back his claims, he said, and this is a quote "lab work is expensive and a waste of time and money", It's funny how you believers never tell anyone about WC Levengoods lies and how he was caught making fraudulent claims! BLT is a joke! They have absolutely zero independent lab work ! Hilarious!
If crop circles were found to not be entirely man made it would be the biggest discovery in human history, there would be thousands of real scientists investigating them, trying to figure out what force could have made them. Every agricultural machinery manufacturer on the planet would be after them to learn how to exploit whatever force was used to manipulate these plants without human intervention, tell me, why is NONE of this happening? Why are zero scientist investigating them?
In 1686 an even earlier British account of geometric areas of flattened plants is found in A Natural History of Staffordshire, written by Professor Robert Plot, LLD, the first "keeper" of Oxford's Ashmolean Museum and a professor of chemistry at Oxford. Professor Plot describes not just circles, but flattened areas "obtaining three parts of a circle, others being Semicircular, some of them Quadrants."
In 1686 an even earlier British account of geometric areas of flattened plants is found in A Natural History of Staffordshire, written by Professor Robert Plot, LLD, the first "keeper" of Oxford's Ashmolean Museum and a professor of chemistry at Oxford. Professor Plot describes not just circles, but flattened areas "obtaining three parts of a circle, others being Semicircular, some of them Quadrants."
Sorry but your claim that there were crop circles as far back as 1678 is wrong. There has never been a crop circle before 1970, not one. If there were why are there no pictures of one in the 60s, 50s, 40s, 30s, 20s,? Why is there no mention of any before the 70s? They started in the 70s and got bigger and more complex each year as people got better at making them. That is why no massive, complex circles ever appeared while the rest were small and simple. They are entirely man made, all of them.
"The Mowing-Devil: or, Strange News out of Hartford-Shire is the title of an English woodcut pamphlet published in 1678.
The pamphlet tells of a farmer who, refusing to pay the price demanded by a labourer to mow his field, swore that he would rather that the Devil mowed it instead. The next morning, the field was found to be perfectly mowed - unnaturally perfect"
"This pamphlet, and the accompanying illustration, is often cited as among the first recorded cases of crop circles by cereologists."
"The Mowing Devil" was not a crop circle, it was a story about a farmer who refused to pay high fees to have his crop harvested, he said he would rather the devil harvested his field than pay the high fees. It was not bent over bt MOWED, and it was mowed in the shape of his field, not any design that could be considered a circle or design. That has been discounted years ago. All crop circle are man made, all of them. End of story.
Why didnt you finish that quote you copied? The part were it says the "mowing Devil" has been discounted as a crop circle? I like how you only showed the first part of that quote! That is just like a believer, you not only hide the facts from everyone else, you hide it from yourself!. If you truly wanted to know the real truth you would look somewhere other than YouTube and the National Enquirer for your facts, if you did you would realise that all crop circles are man made. "Case Closed"
The only thing the makers of those crop circles are saying is "look at how good people are at making crop circles". Crop circles are all man made, they always have been since the first circles were made back in the 1970s.
Your ignorant... Legit crop circles dont have bent stalks or stems like the man made ones do, they have tiny reactions in each and every plant aprox. 2 inches off the ground that bends the stalk... they aren't forced over from the "board and rope" type technique that mimics use.
Who told you that garbage? Sorry but that is complete myth. No "tiny reactions" have occurred in any crop circle. Why dont you ask the idiots who tell you such things to show you the lab reports that back up their claims, they wont be able to because they refuse to have any lab work done, they know they will be proven liars and frauds. There is no such thing as a "mimic" in regards to crop circles. The only difference between any crop circle is the skill level of the people making them.
You can make all the false claims you want, it will never change the fact that all crop circles are man made. Maybe if you actually looked up the sources of your claims you will find out that they are all fraudulent and have no basis in reality. You believers wont even ask the so called "researchers" to show you the lab work that would back up their claims! If you did you would find out that they have none and in fact they refuse to have lab work done, they know it will prove they are liars.
Did you check out W.C. Levengood yet? When you do you will find out he is definitely a fraud. It's ironic, he is the one that started all that "exploded node" garbage and people still fall for it even after it was proven a hoax, even after he was proven a fraud. The rest of the people who based their claims on his lies dont want you to know about Levengood and his lies, they dont tell you how he was caught and how all his claims are void. You fell for his lies, what are you going to use now?
where is the evidence it came over night..... hmm bullshit on crop circles.. why not do it on a landmark why allways out of sight... its a load fo crap.. sorry to dissapoint u all but its callled video editing.. wheather that is on the date of recording.. its quite easy to do
bradrichardson08 1 year ago
@bradrichardson08 Sorry to disapoint you but Crop circle is real, get a right on a chopper get there and you can see them :)
baboelaman 9 months ago
i disagree scientists and researchers have attempted to remake these circles but they found it is impossible to make them as complex as they are and do it in such a short period of time...im not sayin i believe they are from aliens i just dont no
soccerinitalia 2 years ago 5
I believe in aliens but you do realize that crop circles are man made?
hell even I have made crop circles in my life
iadoremanga 2 years ago
I doubt you have made crop circles...
you need to understand there is a huge difference between true crop circles and man made designs in the fields... Look it up.
Obsessedaxe 2 years ago
You can doubt all you want! It wont change the fact that I have and it wont change the fact that ALL of them are man made. The ONLY difference between any crop circle is the skill level of the people making them, some people have more talent than others. The large, very complex circles are made by more talented and skilled makers like myself, the smaller ones are made by people who are new at it and have less talent and skill. They are all man made, that is all there is to it.
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
haha foolish.. impossible geometric shapes created by a couple of drunk dudes..
and 1970's eh? crop circles date back to the first reported incident back in 1678 you stupid moron.. lol here's some more fact for ya.
"the stalks from a crop circle are not bent or broken, but accelerated growth on side of the point of contact, the node bends the stalk."
"not only does the physical appearance of seem to change (it looks dehydrated), but there is change at the molecular level."
Obsessedaxe 2 years ago
Who told you there are "impossible geometric shapes"? It's very obvious that they are not impossible because they are there! Who told you the stocks are bent by "accelerated growth"? That is absolutely HILARIOUS! I cant believe people actually fall for those myths without even one independant lab report, not one! Believers refuse to even ask the people who tell them these ridiculous claims how they came about these claims! I am so glad I grew up asking questions and not falling for myth!
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
"..suggested that these flattened circles were the result of "some cyclonic wind action" and enclosed a sketch of the "most perfect" of these circles which, unfortunately, Nature did not publish..."
Obsessedaxe 2 years ago
You copied and pasted some silly claims without even checking the source! That is funny! If you had checked the sources of your claims you would have realised that not one of these individuals have ever done any lab work, they simply make up a story and sell it to naive and gullible people. It's astonishing that there are still a few people who haven't the common sense to even ask those idiots to show them a copy of a lab report or even the name of a lab! It's hilarious but sad at the same time
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
The physical changes (listed below) documented in crop circle plants by Michigan biophysicist W.C. Levengood have been determined by evaluating hundreds of sample plants -- both downed and standing -- taken from inside the overall perimeter of each formation against hundreds of control plants taken at varying distances outside each formation, in several directions.More than 250 individual crop formations from multiple countries, over a 10-year period were examined in-depth.
Obsessedaxe 2 years ago
WC levengood was BLT's lead "scientist", that is until it was discovered that he lied! He even lied about being a PhD, he claimed he "could be one f he wanted to", He also admitted he did no lab work to back his claims, he said, and this is a quote "lab work is expensive and a waste of time and money", It's funny how you believers never tell anyone about WC Levengoods lies and how he was caught making fraudulent claims! BLT is a joke! They have absolutely zero independent lab work ! Hilarious!
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
If crop circles were found to not be entirely man made it would be the biggest discovery in human history, there would be thousands of real scientists investigating them, trying to figure out what force could have made them. Every agricultural machinery manufacturer on the planet would be after them to learn how to exploit whatever force was used to manipulate these plants without human intervention, tell me, why is NONE of this happening? Why are zero scientist investigating them?
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
In 1686 an even earlier British account of geometric areas of flattened plants is found in A Natural History of Staffordshire, written by Professor Robert Plot, LLD, the first "keeper" of Oxford's Ashmolean Museum and a professor of chemistry at Oxford. Professor Plot describes not just circles, but flattened areas "obtaining three parts of a circle, others being Semicircular, some of them Quadrants."
Obsessedaxe 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In 1686 an even earlier British account of geometric areas of flattened plants is found in A Natural History of Staffordshire, written by Professor Robert Plot, LLD, the first "keeper" of Oxford's Ashmolean Museum and a professor of chemistry at Oxford. Professor Plot describes not just circles, but flattened areas "obtaining three parts of a circle, others being Semicircular, some of them Quadrants."
Obsessedaxe 2 years ago
Sorry but your claim that there were crop circles as far back as 1678 is wrong. There has never been a crop circle before 1970, not one. If there were why are there no pictures of one in the 60s, 50s, 40s, 30s, 20s,? Why is there no mention of any before the 70s? They started in the 70s and got bigger and more complex each year as people got better at making them. That is why no massive, complex circles ever appeared while the rest were small and simple. They are entirely man made, all of them.
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
"The Mowing-Devil: or, Strange News out of Hartford-Shire is the title of an English woodcut pamphlet published in 1678.
The pamphlet tells of a farmer who, refusing to pay the price demanded by a labourer to mow his field, swore that he would rather that the Devil mowed it instead. The next morning, the field was found to be perfectly mowed - unnaturally perfect"
"This pamphlet, and the accompanying illustration, is often cited as among the first recorded cases of crop circles by cereologists."
Obsessedaxe 2 years ago
"The Mowing Devil" was not a crop circle, it was a story about a farmer who refused to pay high fees to have his crop harvested, he said he would rather the devil harvested his field than pay the high fees. It was not bent over bt MOWED, and it was mowed in the shape of his field, not any design that could be considered a circle or design. That has been discounted years ago. All crop circle are man made, all of them. End of story.
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
Why didnt you finish that quote you copied? The part were it says the "mowing Devil" has been discounted as a crop circle? I like how you only showed the first part of that quote! That is just like a believer, you not only hide the facts from everyone else, you hide it from yourself!. If you truly wanted to know the real truth you would look somewhere other than YouTube and the National Enquirer for your facts, if you did you would realise that all crop circles are man made. "Case Closed"
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
@iadoremanga Have you made one as complex and as geometrically correct? I doubt it.
MrClapTrap 1 year ago
The only thing the makers of those crop circles are saying is "look at how good people are at making crop circles". Crop circles are all man made, they always have been since the first circles were made back in the 1970s.
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
Your ignorant... Legit crop circles dont have bent stalks or stems like the man made ones do, they have tiny reactions in each and every plant aprox. 2 inches off the ground that bends the stalk... they aren't forced over from the "board and rope" type technique that mimics use.
Obsessedaxe 2 years ago
Who told you that garbage? Sorry but that is complete myth. No "tiny reactions" have occurred in any crop circle. Why dont you ask the idiots who tell you such things to show you the lab reports that back up their claims, they wont be able to because they refuse to have any lab work done, they know they will be proven liars and frauds. There is no such thing as a "mimic" in regards to crop circles. The only difference between any crop circle is the skill level of the people making them.
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
Look at the "BLT research" page for starters you ignorant fuck.
Case closed
Obsessedaxe 2 years ago
You can make all the false claims you want, it will never change the fact that all crop circles are man made. Maybe if you actually looked up the sources of your claims you will find out that they are all fraudulent and have no basis in reality. You believers wont even ask the so called "researchers" to show you the lab work that would back up their claims! If you did you would find out that they have none and in fact they refuse to have lab work done, they know it will prove they are liars.
youstupidmoron 2 years ago
Did you check out W.C. Levengood yet? When you do you will find out he is definitely a fraud. It's ironic, he is the one that started all that "exploded node" garbage and people still fall for it even after it was proven a hoax, even after he was proven a fraud. The rest of the people who based their claims on his lies dont want you to know about Levengood and his lies, they dont tell you how he was caught and how all his claims are void. You fell for his lies, what are you going to use now?
youstupidmoron 2 years ago