**That's why Lear is cursing everyone at the end, "You are men of stone." What he means is none of you care, you will wait till it is too late then clean up the mess. As Lear himself does, executing the executioner. Justice is 'right' but it does no 'good,' it is just an endless march of punishment, because justice is lifeless. Without life there is no meaningful justice for good or bad. But without care there is no life. Lear's greatness is his heart, though he finds it very late.
@0davus The ending of 'King Lear' was perceived to be so bleak that Nahum Tate's version featuring a happy ending dominated the stage from the Restoration until the 1830's. Truth is, no other Shakespeare tragedy ends on on a more pessimistic note. In 'Antony and Cleopatra', for instance, there is a sense of glory in the noble suicides of the two titular characters as well as the notion of Rome's future golden age under Augustus. 'King Lear' ends with a gloomy observation of the play's events.
I find 'King Lear' to be Shakespeare's crowning achievement, and the ending is easily one of the most haunting and heartbreaking moments in both literature and theatre. As Samuel Johnson said, the death of Cordelia goes against every sense of justice and the hope of the reader. All other Shakespearean tragedies end with at least a small glimmer of justice and/or hope for the future. 'King Lear', however, leaves an impression of pure despair.
Actually Edgar almost saves Cordelia, after Edmund's repentance (cut out of this vid) he is running to save her. Lear kills the hangman as well - too late.
Shakespeare's comment on the nature of justice is more "too late" than it doesn't exist at all.
Another example is Cornwall's servant who doesn't lift a finger until after one of Gloster's eyes is put out.
It raises the question, not of whether life or existence is fair, but whether fairness/justice matters as we think it does.
@0davus There is much truth in what you state. Despite this, the fact that justice arrives too late does not diminish the injustice of what happens. On the contrary, the fact that the play presents such a sense of hope through the actions of the good characters contributes to make the ending seem even bleaker and more unjust. The price Lear pays for his folly in many ways seems too harsh, but that is what makes it such a powerful tragedy.
This is my favourite of any I've seen because he shows weakness, his voice gets high pitched and squeaky. We've seen the assertiveness of a king degrade into the testiness of an old man who has trouble controlling his own body now. There's just a hair between the two earlier on -you see him go over the line. Some people just keep a rounded tone, right to the end. He really looks and sounds as if he's losing it . He knows this play is all about power.
You Know I'm A Big Fan Of Shakespeare And Laurence Olivier.... but i think this is version is so dull and boring.......... i was disappointed considering the cast
o man thanx for the video...am actually doing a review on this same film for english class. am suppose to be a movie critic so over all i gave it some negative views but the acting was awesome and made up for the past arts when compared with those of 2day but the effects and setting could have been done better
There is King Lear, and then there is Laurence Olivier's King Lear. William Shakespeare would be proud.
sageSPH 2 weeks ago
**That's why Lear is cursing everyone at the end, "You are men of stone." What he means is none of you care, you will wait till it is too late then clean up the mess. As Lear himself does, executing the executioner. Justice is 'right' but it does no 'good,' it is just an endless march of punishment, because justice is lifeless. Without life there is no meaningful justice for good or bad. But without care there is no life. Lear's greatness is his heart, though he finds it very late.
0davus 2 months ago
@0davus The ending of 'King Lear' was perceived to be so bleak that Nahum Tate's version featuring a happy ending dominated the stage from the Restoration until the 1830's. Truth is, no other Shakespeare tragedy ends on on a more pessimistic note. In 'Antony and Cleopatra', for instance, there is a sense of glory in the noble suicides of the two titular characters as well as the notion of Rome's future golden age under Augustus. 'King Lear' ends with a gloomy observation of the play's events.
rigstula 2 months ago
They left out my favorite line!
"Yet Edmund was beloved
The one the other poisoned for my sake,
And after slew herself."
MacWillyFortunes 4 months ago
I find 'King Lear' to be Shakespeare's crowning achievement, and the ending is easily one of the most haunting and heartbreaking moments in both literature and theatre. As Samuel Johnson said, the death of Cordelia goes against every sense of justice and the hope of the reader. All other Shakespearean tragedies end with at least a small glimmer of justice and/or hope for the future. 'King Lear', however, leaves an impression of pure despair.
rigstula 5 months ago
Actually Edgar almost saves Cordelia, after Edmund's repentance (cut out of this vid) he is running to save her. Lear kills the hangman as well - too late.
Shakespeare's comment on the nature of justice is more "too late" than it doesn't exist at all.
Another example is Cornwall's servant who doesn't lift a finger until after one of Gloster's eyes is put out.
It raises the question, not of whether life or existence is fair, but whether fairness/justice matters as we think it does.
0davus 2 months ago
@0davus There is much truth in what you state. Despite this, the fact that justice arrives too late does not diminish the injustice of what happens. On the contrary, the fact that the play presents such a sense of hope through the actions of the good characters contributes to make the ending seem even bleaker and more unjust. The price Lear pays for his folly in many ways seems too harsh, but that is what makes it such a powerful tragedy.
rigstula 2 months ago
lots of heavy breathing
I keep expecting a major movie kiss
rosetintworld 11 months ago 2
Why would he ware chain mail on his head only
austpom333 1 year ago
@austpom333 he was hiding his identity
unclebreezybum 9 months ago
By the way, that's Frank Gallagher (from shameless) playing Edgar.
alanjewels 1 year ago
I love Olivier's version because out of all the Lear's, it is the saddest. The quitness and pure desolation he brings is quite heartbreaking.
chasen47 2 years ago 2
This is my favourite of any I've seen because he shows weakness, his voice gets high pitched and squeaky. We've seen the assertiveness of a king degrade into the testiness of an old man who has trouble controlling his own body now. There's just a hair between the two earlier on -you see him go over the line. Some people just keep a rounded tone, right to the end. He really looks and sounds as if he's losing it . He knows this play is all about power.
magenchild 1 year ago
You Know I'm A Big Fan Of Shakespeare And Laurence Olivier.... but i think this is version is so dull and boring.......... i was disappointed considering the cast
stephen1988LFC 2 years ago
I always cry at that. "Why should a dog, a horse, a rat have life, and now... no breath at all...?"
marius478 2 years ago 10
And thou no breath at all
UnfamiliarPlace 2 years ago
@marius478 It's actually "and thou no breath at all?" but yeah that part is sad.
JustLovie 1 year ago
@marius478 Agreed my friend, although it is THOU and not NOW..
gilbertgodlyddd 10 months ago 2
@marius478 it is good isnt it!!
kendosendo 9 months ago
its BEN HARPER FROM MY FAMILY!!!!
wickedgal27 3 years ago 7
Astounding. Bravo Sir Laurence and brilliant cast.
boxingglovelove 3 years ago
such a poignant moment when lear enters burdened by cordelia. Olivier pulls of the animalism of 'howl' perfectly, but he is no mckellen.
albany is also well-played. very commanding when talking to the "unnatural hag" gonerill
Google0002 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
my god. the set, acting and direction are seriously bad.
tenmilefarm 3 years ago
they are
babacanosh2 2 years ago
That fourth "never" is astonishing.
colostomywithers 3 years ago
though i like shakespeare and i like laurence olivier, it was too hard to watch this play.
starrbeatlesqueen 3 years ago
Wow. Very young looking David Threlfall! FRAAAAAAANK!!
HighBrowMarxistWays 3 years ago
o man thanx for the video...am actually doing a review on this same film for english class. am suppose to be a movie critic so over all i gave it some negative views but the acting was awesome and made up for the past arts when compared with those of 2day but the effects and setting could have been done better
watri 3 years ago
Bravo! For the play, I remember, pleas'd not the million, 'twas cavairy to the general.
DeathWishMonkey 4 years ago
Sir Laurence is King Lear. There will never be another actor as good at it.
LindaLaCagnina 4 years ago
I thought Edgar was going to be kissed at 1:00.
And Olivier is like a woman here! Yikes!
Without that 'cello going, this would be rather poor.
nextren 4 years ago
LMAO!!!!!
sweethoneyb7 4 years ago
I prefer the later Olivier stuff like this, when he'd calmed down a little. Incredible acting.
Birdieupon 4 years ago
sweeeet. thanks for posting it.
Turk3ylips 4 years ago 2