I drive an '01 Seville SLS and they really get up and go. I've timed my best 0-60 at around 6.6 seconds, with my 0-90 around 13 seconds. Very impressive for such a big car, and even more so considering it's the SLS and not the STS. With my exhaust work, the car sounds beefy at low end too.
those looked like some heavy rims on the 300 but good pull man lets me know where my 98 gtp stands against a N/A 300zx was thinking about getting a N/A 300zx b/c i love there look but idk if i want a car that i can pull hard on with the car i have now
I'm pretty sure it would, and I'm not saying that just because I own the STS. Do you have the 4.9? If so, the 4.9 would get the jump off the line, but the STS would come back with the high-end power.
i do have the 4.9, and i agree about the high end power, ive also had the 4.5 but it wasnt really anything to brag about, ive never raced another caddy but ive never failed to burn out a ricer
Many have commented that the 92-97s are more aerodynamic than the 98-03, even though the 92-97s are a bit more "boxy." Essentially they have the same engine, the 300HP Northstar V8. Get a "Z" rated Cadillac and you have no speed limited and can take it up to whatever the speedometer says it can go. (Around 160 MPH)
Same thing with my '96 STS..i always have jappy crappy's at red lights trying to show me what they got, but i more often than not leave them behind in da dust...There's nothing like the feeling of pushin da pedal to the metal of an STS
My '76 Caddy can still beat most imports (stock ones at least) of the line. But that's probably because it has `360 ft-lbs of torque at 2200 RPM and 190 HP at 3200 RPM. That basically gives it a great launch, but crappy top speed. But, a new intake, cam, headers and exhaust system bumps that up considerably. Still, it's pretty impressive to see a 5500# car leave as quick as mine does, even stock....
this just goes to show that just cuz a car looks sporty it doesnt mean its fast. its funny how all these kids in high school and colleges buy eclipses, cougars, svt focus, which are all slower than even an SLS, or a stock honda oddysey minivan, for example. some kids just have to look at more whats under the hood rather than whats over.
The new STS-V will do 0-60 in 4.7 sec run the 1/4 mile in 13.2 at 107.5 mph and has a electronically limited top speed of 155mph, it gives me a warm fuzzy feeling^^
I drive an '01 Seville SLS and they really get up and go. I've timed my best 0-60 at around 6.6 seconds, with my 0-90 around 13 seconds. Very impressive for such a big car, and even more so considering it's the SLS and not the STS. With my exhaust work, the car sounds beefy at low end too.
Halogen360 2 years ago
those looked like some heavy rims on the 300 but good pull man lets me know where my 98 gtp stands against a N/A 300zx was thinking about getting a N/A 300zx b/c i love there look but idk if i want a car that i can pull hard on with the car i have now
nickv11763 2 years ago
sat thats yo caddy in thiz video
hooddollz 2 years ago
Yessir.
sl1ck 2 years ago
im just curious, would that caddy beat my 93 sedan deville?
rmcubssuck35 3 years ago
I'm pretty sure it would, and I'm not saying that just because I own the STS. Do you have the 4.9? If so, the 4.9 would get the jump off the line, but the STS would come back with the high-end power.
sl1ck 3 years ago
i do have the 4.9, and i agree about the high end power, ive also had the 4.5 but it wasnt really anything to brag about, ive never raced another caddy but ive never failed to burn out a ricer
rmcubssuck35 3 years ago
gotta Love about Cadillac, power and class together to blast
54spiritedwill54 3 years ago 6
are the 98-03 slower den than the 92-97?
cuckookumari 4 years ago
Many have commented that the 92-97s are more aerodynamic than the 98-03, even though the 92-97s are a bit more "boxy." Essentially they have the same engine, the 300HP Northstar V8. Get a "Z" rated Cadillac and you have no speed limited and can take it up to whatever the speedometer says it can go. (Around 160 MPH)
sl1ck 4 years ago
governed at 155, thats what my 94 would do she'd probably only do 163-165 tops but it pulled hard up to 155. i'll find the vid and post it
jrkoff 4 years ago
my 97 eldo etc is governed at 152mph...says top speed reached, fuel cut-off or something like that.
bbrewer5 3 years ago
Exactly
sl1ck 3 years ago
99 Deville biotch stock as a buick quick as a jet, it is def great as shit, i fuk evry1 up in dat shit
biggiesm210006 4 years ago
The Deville's tight, but it can't fuck with the Seville STS. I got that '99 STS, you can check it out in my videos.
CavvyStudios 3 years ago
Caddy Rules
muh248 4 years ago 3
caddys are fucking awsome i have a sls and does about 100mph in the qtr
123bassguitar 4 years ago
hehehe.Jap junk beat again by another Caddy....Maybe he should of wound it up tighter? Maybe it needs a bigger muffler.... HAHAHAHAHA
Tflack2006 4 years ago
true....And funny as shit, "bigger muffle" ahahahah xD
biggiesm210006 4 years ago
lol nice and easy
lbwd 4 years ago
Nice, Cadillacs PWN!
True power is Northstar + Cadillac.
Zw33k3rb0y 4 years ago
Same thing with my '96 STS..i always have jappy crappy's at red lights trying to show me what they got, but i more often than not leave them behind in da dust...There's nothing like the feeling of pushin da pedal to the metal of an STS
krookstax 4 years ago
Actually the latest STS V8 his 60 in 5.9 seconds.
CadillacTone 5 years ago
the 300 hp northstar is great on highway races (lot's of power concealed), but off the line it's comparable to the sluggish marauder.
Valiant81 5 years ago
My '76 Caddy can still beat most imports (stock ones at least) of the line. But that's probably because it has `360 ft-lbs of torque at 2200 RPM and 190 HP at 3200 RPM. That basically gives it a great launch, but crappy top speed. But, a new intake, cam, headers and exhaust system bumps that up considerably. Still, it's pretty impressive to see a 5500# car leave as quick as mine does, even stock....
crezzyman 4 years ago
this just goes to show that just cuz a car looks sporty it doesnt mean its fast. its funny how all these kids in high school and colleges buy eclipses, cougars, svt focus, which are all slower than even an SLS, or a stock honda oddysey minivan, for example. some kids just have to look at more whats under the hood rather than whats over.
pfo335 5 years ago
1996 Cadillac STS - 0-60 6.4 Seconds and Top Speed 150 MPH with the Z-Rated Tires;; absolutely walks all over any N/A 300ZX or 3000GT
DurfeeV6 5 years ago
ooh a sts beat a nonturbo wanklooking Z lol "wow" zzzzzz ,STS are dogs from a roll,I speak from experience beatingone
05rsx 5 years ago
Lol...That guy who you beat probably had no idea how to drive...Dogs my ass
Robertdavis13 4 years ago
The new STS-V will do 0-60 in 4.7 sec run the 1/4 mile in 13.2 at 107.5 mph and has a electronically limited top speed of 155mph, it gives me a warm fuzzy feeling^^
hrpuffnstuff15 5 years ago
yea the newer sts 2000-2003 does 0-60 in 6.7 secs
pfo335 5 years ago
i think its 305 horses and 0-60 in around 7 sec.
sportydude03 5 years ago
cadilllac what yall know bout northstar
guccigurl89 5 years ago
thats what u gotta Love about Cadillac, power and class together to blast yo bitch ass
DSNCB919 5 years ago
seemed even to me, NA got a late start cause he likes abusing his tranny by revving and dropping it into D.
DrewZ926 5 years ago
lol. you don't f*ck with a Northstar.
BennyCadillac 5 years ago
of course the STS wins, lol. everyone sleeps on the sporty Caddy
vaboyy06 5 years ago
Thats alot of money wasted on a good looking non-turbo 300.
jimmygu 5 years ago