Tore the story apart and why would there be letters under the floorboards at Green Gables. An orphan suddenly with a wealthy family and her parents come back to life. The whole concept didn't make any sense at all. The acting and costuming were good it just didn't crack it with me. Megan Follows cannot be beaten in this role, and the original is the best. The sequels were great as well. The cast in the original was brilliant and cannot be made better. Don't break from perfection. Remakes- Naa
This is embarrassing and ridiculous. I am actually angry and offended. What in the world was Kevin Sullivan thinking?!!!! Why not turn RAINBOW VALLEY or RILLA of INGLESIDE into movies? This is tripe and has no basis in the book.
This looks like crap! The original series with Megan Follows was wonderful. The fourth installment where Anne and Gilert are older and caught up in WW1 is alright, but jumps to far from the books. There seems to be a slow decline in the quality of these Sullivan movies as he "fanfics" his own stuff and strays farther from the source material. Whats wrong with Anne's background as in the books? Whats so much "better" about a lieing Anne whose parents were not teachers? Others thoughts?
This is SO WRONG. It's like watching The Return to the Secret Garden. Plus this little girl playing Anne is far to over-dramatic then the dreamy whimiscalness of Megan Follows.
horrible, way too far from the book. Bad form Kevin Sullivan,booo. Maybe your lack of income from this movie will show you that you need to stick to the author's story line instead of putting your ideas into the plot.
It should have been Megan Follows which conyinue the role as Anne Shirley as the old on Green Gables and it will be okay the young played of Hannah Endicott-Douglass.She do it really well.
I've read this book (quite a pleasant read) but it seems to have nothing to do with a trailer. Mrs Thomas wasn't rich. Anne was an orphan. Oh well, I'll order this anyway and check it out. Barbara Hershey and Shirley Maclaine. Not a shabby cast.
I'm sure that when I have to chance, I will watch this movie even though I've read so much about it that is not good. And more than likely, I will agree with the way it's been handled. I don't understand why they couldn't have gotten Megan Follows? And why did they do what they did to Gilbert? The 3rd movie was good, but if you'd read the books you didn't like it for how they did it.
what they really should do is redo anne 3 because it was no good and continue on through the books. It would be AWESOME to see anne's house of dreams, of ingleside, and rainbow valley done right!
@leahknits TOTALLY!! I totally agree. Why does the film industry make SUCH STUPID HORRIBLE decisions. Rainbow Valley and Rilla of Ingleside would probably do as well as the first two movies, if they do it right.
the details they made up for this film change anne's personality completely and for the worse. anne is now a lier and ashamed of her family. completely not the anne from the books or from the previous films. this is some other anne, not anne of green gables. it worries me that uninitiated people will see this movie and always associate it with the story.
Why can't these people stick to the words Montgomery wrote? It's a prequel, but it seems that they fiddled with major story details...apparently Anne's father isn't dead afterall? I'd rather they do Anne's House of Dreams and also re-do Gilbert & Anne's wedding which was poorly handled in the 3rd movie. The acting does look good though.
Hmmm...seems the real story by Lucy Maude Montgomery is fine as is. Why the need for a pre-quel that's not from the book? Something tells me the 'purists' won't like this one...but I guess I'll decide for myself if and when this movie is available in the US
What the heck?? As if she lived with some wealthy lady before she came to green gables. This better be from her imagination... I am not sure how I feel about this...
I know there was 1934. It did need tarting up.
Bakers13Dozen 4 months ago
Tore the story apart and why would there be letters under the floorboards at Green Gables. An orphan suddenly with a wealthy family and her parents come back to life. The whole concept didn't make any sense at all. The acting and costuming were good it just didn't crack it with me. Megan Follows cannot be beaten in this role, and the original is the best. The sequels were great as well. The cast in the original was brilliant and cannot be made better. Don't break from perfection. Remakes- Naa
Bakers13Dozen 4 months ago
This is embarrassing and ridiculous. I am actually angry and offended. What in the world was Kevin Sullivan thinking?!!!! Why not turn RAINBOW VALLEY or RILLA of INGLESIDE into movies? This is tripe and has no basis in the book.
deedeedmr 10 months ago
This looks like crap! The original series with Megan Follows was wonderful. The fourth installment where Anne and Gilert are older and caught up in WW1 is alright, but jumps to far from the books. There seems to be a slow decline in the quality of these Sullivan movies as he "fanfics" his own stuff and strays farther from the source material. Whats wrong with Anne's background as in the books? Whats so much "better" about a lieing Anne whose parents were not teachers? Others thoughts?
kalara75 1 year ago
This is SO WRONG. It's like watching The Return to the Secret Garden. Plus this little girl playing Anne is far to over-dramatic then the dreamy whimiscalness of Megan Follows.
MermaidBlueFins 1 year ago 2
horrible, way too far from the book. Bad form Kevin Sullivan,booo. Maybe your lack of income from this movie will show you that you need to stick to the author's story line instead of putting your ideas into the plot.
EmbroideredFlower 1 year ago 2
is this a new american girl movie? it looks interesting
bubblesfan31896 1 year ago
but the girl is very good at acting
but the shouldnt have made a remake
emmaO85 1 year ago
It should have been Megan Follows which conyinue the role as Anne Shirley as the old on Green Gables and it will be okay the young played of Hannah Endicott-Douglass.She do it really well.
annefan4ever 1 year ago
That girl is not Anna.
Megan!? Where are you!?
KikyoChanXD 1 year ago
Sorry, but Megan Follows will always be mine Anne and I can't watch an Anne movie without Gilbert in it.
g1991231 1 year ago 5
i just cant bear to watch and Anne movie in which gilbert is DEAD its just beyond wrong its positively BLASPHEMOUS! I utterly refuse.
mchool 1 year ago
I can't imagine anyone other than Megan Follows as Anne...she fit the role to a T. I'm not really feeling the new Anne....
JonasBrosFan17 1 year ago 3
The new one does fine; it's just that Megan is Anne for all of us who have watched the original Sullivan version for so many years.
RichKnight2010 1 year ago
sorry but i'll always like the real original one
the new one is a fail.
stopnope 1 year ago 3
The new Anne does look cute! But she's nothing compared to Megan Follows!
ConfuzzledCub 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Me too the only Anne that exists is the one that's played by Megan Follows.
islandaisqc 2 years ago
the little girl that played anne was very good and she was cute!! but i must say thats about all i like about this movie.
icarlybigfan95 2 years ago 2
I agree. Megan Follows would be a nearly impossible act to follow. But this little girl is really good.
I don't like the story. Nothing like the books. It will probably be a dud because of that.
AmaindeJH 2 years ago 4
I've read this book (quite a pleasant read) but it seems to have nothing to do with a trailer. Mrs Thomas wasn't rich. Anne was an orphan. Oh well, I'll order this anyway and check it out. Barbara Hershey and Shirley Maclaine. Not a shabby cast.
InsubordinationFreak 2 years ago
Yeah, same.
Megan Follows was a perfect Anne.
BlatentlyBooshified 2 years ago 4
I'm sure that when I have to chance, I will watch this movie even though I've read so much about it that is not good. And more than likely, I will agree with the way it's been handled. I don't understand why they couldn't have gotten Megan Follows? And why did they do what they did to Gilbert? The 3rd movie was good, but if you'd read the books you didn't like it for how they did it.
sierradane 2 years ago
They should have cast Raelee Hill. She looks exactly like an older Anne. Beautiful red curls, delicate features and starry grey eyes.
Lindy1708 2 years ago
what they really should do is redo anne 3 because it was no good and continue on through the books. It would be AWESOME to see anne's house of dreams, of ingleside, and rainbow valley done right!
leahknits 2 years ago
Amen!!!
GloryB2Jesus 1 year ago
@leahknits TOTALLY!! I totally agree. Why does the film industry make SUCH STUPID HORRIBLE decisions. Rainbow Valley and Rilla of Ingleside would probably do as well as the first two movies, if they do it right.
deedeedmr 10 months ago
The film industry is just looking for a reason to hire Shirley MacClain.
pentime6 2 years ago
the details they made up for this film change anne's personality completely and for the worse. anne is now a lier and ashamed of her family. completely not the anne from the books or from the previous films. this is some other anne, not anne of green gables. it worries me that uninitiated people will see this movie and always associate it with the story.
DondaLonda 2 years ago 3
they should only rely on montgomery books.....they should make a series on anne of ingleside...
saveen3 2 years ago
this loooks so gay.. fancy trying to get another girl to play anne. Megan Follows was brilliant. She WAS anne!
dinochompeth 3 years ago 4
my dad is the D.O.P. on this movie
WarcraftGooru 3 years ago
Well, from the trailer, it looks really well-shot.
InsubordinationFreak 2 years ago
I seen it last nite and the movie was not like how i thought it would be!....It was just blaaah!
SweetnessAngel2008 3 years ago 2
Why can't these people stick to the words Montgomery wrote? It's a prequel, but it seems that they fiddled with major story details...apparently Anne's father isn't dead afterall? I'd rather they do Anne's House of Dreams and also re-do Gilbert & Anne's wedding which was poorly handled in the 3rd movie. The acting does look good though.
KittyKins57 3 years ago 3
Hmmm...seems the real story by Lucy Maude Montgomery is fine as is. Why the need for a pre-quel that's not from the book? Something tells me the 'purists' won't like this one...but I guess I'll decide for myself if and when this movie is available in the US
SabrinaMessenger 3 years ago 3
hannah looks great, but im not sure about 'old anne' i dont feel she has the 'anne' spirit.
actshorty 3 years ago
What the heck?? As if she lived with some wealthy lady before she came to green gables. This better be from her imagination... I am not sure how I feel about this...
1shoegal1 3 years ago 12
why do teaser trailers always look better than the official one?
amen4me 3 years ago
no idea!
SweetnessAngel2008 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is not happening...
KateOlson 3 years ago
Cool... ^^
MegaLansss 3 years ago