Military training was immediately imposed on the Maltese population. Some old people and women were encouraged to go to Sicily to be safe. Measures were taken to ensure adequate supplies of corn from Sicily. The defence force consisted of some 9,000 men, which included some 600 Knights and 8,000 local military force.
In 1557 La Valette was elected for Grandmaster of the Order of St. John. His experience was going to prove useful to the Order and the Maltese during the Great Siege. La Vallette was the first one to start urging for preparation for the coming Siege. His intuition was proved correct!
La Vallette, who had become a Knight at eighteen years of age, was a courageous soldier. He could speak Italian, Spanish, Greek and Turkish. This was obviously too the Order's advantage. When La Vallette became the Admiral of the Order's fleet, he caught Kust Ali in 1554, and sent him to row in the galleys. La Vallette was a powerful leader in battle. When the ships under his command used to attack they always would win
In October 1564 rumours reached Malta from the Ottoman Empire of a planned attack on Malta. The French Grandmaster Jean Parisot De La Vallette recalled to the Convent (the headquarters of the Knights in "Birgu") all the Knights who were living abroad and appealed for help in the preparations for the coming siege.
For the attack on Malta of 1565, the Turkish Sultan Soleyman sent again his general Dragut. However, this time he was to be helped by two admirals: Admiral Piali Pasha was to be in charge of the fleet, while Admiral Mustapha Pasha was to be in command of the army. On the other hand, the Order of St. John was to be led by Grandmaster Jean Parisot De La Vallette, with the backing of the Pope and the Holy Roman Emperor.
Turkish Sultan, had let the Order leave peacefully from Rhodes; after the Knights settled in Malta in 1530, they still continued attacking Turkish ships around the Mediterranean. Therefore, Soleyman was getting very annoyed with the losses his empire was suffering. Moreover, he was also unhappy about the fact that when one of his best generals, Dragut, attacked the Maltese Islands in 1551, he did not succeed in invading Malta and defeating the Knights
we maltese are brave persons fuck the ottomans the only point is that we won we have great history and don t forget we wher blessed by our gog it was a miracle to win against 60,000 go and learn history who said against malta
SOME SAY TO THEIR WISHFULL THINKING THAT THESE ARE TOY SOLDIERS,BUT MY FRIENDS WEATHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT THIS IS HISTORY,THE OTTOMAN GENERAL WAS KILLED IN TINY MALTA.REMEMBER ONLY THIS 5000 MALTESE,500 KNIGHTS AND A BRAVE GRAND MASTER JEAN DE LA VALLETTE DAFEATED AN ARMY OF 30,OOO OTTOMANS.WE WERE BESIEGED FOR 3 MONTHS BY THAN THE OTTOMANS RECIEVED AN OTHER 30,000 MORE=60,000 OTTOMANS AGAINST 600 BRAVE MALTESE,AND500 KNIGHTS,AND OUR BRAVE GRAND MASTER.I FORGOT TO NAME THE OTTOMAN GENERAL,PASHA
Oh, please. Don't be so defensive. I just don't find this film either very informative, nor illuminating. I wasn't commenting on, or taking sides in a historical battle; nor do I feel sorry for the Ottomans. But if you want to play with your toy soldiers, part-time historical enactors, and (to my mind) rather bombastically loud music, please go ahead. It's a free world but if you post a film and invite comments why are you so defensive if someone is not so impressed by it? It's narcissism.
@peyiots if u would spend more time thinking & less time being a total asshole maybe u would fucking notice that THIS IS NOT A DOCUMENTARY U FUCKING IDIOT, this is a music tribute vid, now if ur so stupid that u don't even know such vids exist then just shut ur fucking mouth, if ur gonna act like a total dickhead. If u want info on history go buy some books or read history accounts on history sites not on some yt tribute vid. TO YOUR MIND? unfortunatly for u i don't give a shit of u or ur mind.
This is not really a documentary. It has no text, it is accompanied by a rather tiring, strident, pseudo, and overblown music which is also too loud and comes across as a bit of post-historical staging with diisneyworld extras. Sorry mate; too bombastic. Stick to commercials for toy soldiers and airfix models.
@peyiots WHO THE HELL TOLD YOU THIS IS A DOCUMENTARY??? you just tried to make a fool of others but overlooked the fact that you'r making a fool of yourself only. For text all you needed to do is read the freakin text in the discription. If u feel sorry for the ottoman dickheads cos they got humiliated by a handful of knights & farmers its fine, but don't try to paint it as something else especially when u got nothing to prove. IDIOT.
@Suppressingfire The siege of Malta, or perhaps more fitting; The embarassment of the Ottomans despite odds of almost ten to one in their favour, remains fact forever. Don't be bothered or get irritated by the rantings of someone quoting authors that are obviously biased. "Speak not in the ears of a fool: for he will despise the wisdom of thy words." Proverbs 23:9 from the source pre-dating all other claims of "Christhood" and contact with God. If that isn't satisfying, compare the contenders.
@seahorseofvenice chapter 19 verse 28 is not literal, "sister of Aaron" means that Mary was a descendant of Aaron (as). Paran and Bacca in the Bible are the hedjaz and that area, and Mecca, and the Bible clearly speaks of Ismael and his mother going to Paran.
@seahorseofvenice what have you said about the Quran is just speculation with no proof. the Quran is the most authentic scripture from all the religions today. the variations in early Quranic manuscripts which were discovered are so minimal, that they are basically negligible.
@seahorseofvenice we Maltese don't have much from arabs except a part of our language, cos our language comes from Italian, Greek, French, Latin & Arabic ,so its not an arabic language either. Sry but i think u misunderstood me, i never said the Romans mixed ppl with Carthaginians, i said we Maltese aided the Romans to get us rid of the Carthaginians during the 2nd punic war, cos malta was under carthage before romans came. & i never said berbers are arabs, of course not, why u say that? ;)
@seahorseofvenice Yes it does, Thats why i'm proud of the Maltese Islands & of course we Maltese are not arabs, whoever thinks that is a retard. Turks are not arabs either, turks come from somewhere near china & from mongolia. But i mentioned arabs cos muslim arab fatimids did invade our islands some 700-800 years before the muslim ottoman turks did & by God's Grace, both were kicked out.
@seahorseofvenice yes thats very true, evrything u said.. the Normans were a Godsend to us, cos together we were able to kick the arabs out for good. Besides the italian & sicilian banishments to Malta, Malta was under Roman & the later Roman-Byzantine protection, from the 2nd punic war in the 200s BC, when we aided them to get us rid of the Carthaginians, all the way to the 800s AD. Malta never looked to Romans as our invaders but our Liberators, just as the Normans, the Knights & the British.
a debate by amateur historians all based upon wishful thinking. Belief and no need to rationalize anything. But if God is Great, He is above such rationalizations, can not have dictated such books, and is also above religious wars. People fight because they want land, power, riches, slaves, and always find reasons to rationalize such desires. Because God has promised this land to us, because God hates infidels, not created by Him but by a rival god perhaps from another universe. Etc
@siinantara people also fight for DEFENCE of land, heritage, religion etc. Tell me something if no one defends christianity just because the gospel preaches "love thy enemies" do u think christianity or anyother religion for that matter, will survive?? the gospel also preaches "an eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth". If u love ur family i assume ur ready to fight to defend them from harm. Throughout history muslims already attempted to conquer & islamise the world 3 times, & now they'r on the 4th
@seahorseofvenice the fact that there never were variances in the recitations of the Prophet Muhammad shows that all this was not coming from the mind but from divine revelation, and that the Kuran was being preserved in Muhammad by God, not by the human mind. had there been any variances the public would have recognized them.
@seahorseofvenice the hebrew and christian scriptures were not readily available to the common people, as the writing and preservation of scriptures was done by the scribes and scholars, not a public or popular thing. The Messenger of God recited the revelations publicly, and the verses of the Kuran spread out, were recited and memorized publicly by his followers. it is impossible that the religion was "pieced together" as you say, while the people remained unaware.
... this prophecy is very very important. who according to you is That Prophet who is 1) like Moses a.s., and 2)is raised from among the brethren of the Israelites ? do you know who the brethren of the Israelites are, christian?
also, since christians believe that there is no prophet after Jesus, can you tell me who the jews were waiting for in John 1:20, when they asked John the Baptist are you 1) the Messiah 2) Elijah 3) THAT PROPHET? So besides the Messiah there was also Elijah and That Prophet. actually christians go on to say that That Prophet is the One referred to in Deuteronomy 18:15-18, and actually deuteronomy18 is the verses on which the 9th of the Jewish laws (613 mitzvot) is based? so you can see that ...
...a) believing that there is no god but God and the Unity/Oneness of God 2) repenting to God and worshipping ONLY THE One God. So according to you the Prophets before Jesus who i hope you believe in, were all wrong and their revelation war wrong?!! (God forbid)
1. where does Jesus say he is a god in the gospels? 2. where does Jesus say that salvation comes from the cross or from his sacrifice, in the gospels? 3.where does ANYWHERE in Torah or Gospels say that salvation comes from believing in the cross or death and resurrection of Jesus, in order to obtain salvation and the expiation of sins? 3. How do you as a christian reconcile the fact that the Messengers from God believed in the Oneness of God and that atonement comes from ...
I see you are hating again. Please, get a life, quit dreaming of another crusade, set aside early Christian teachings and make up a better solution than nuking people. Perhaps you can finally stop fellating the Pope's phallus.
You have to understand christianity evolved compared to what happen back in the crusades.The true teaching of christ was always about love,justice, peace, long suffering.It was always in the bible, if christian relgions commited acts against humanity in the name of god, well they were wrong.I have to say also in the bible, one has the right to defend himself,so that means we aint gonna be your bitch, if you attack our western society.I see alot of muslims from comments want Ottoman empire back..
stupid malta person. you hate muslims so much but your and all the people of malta share the same origin with that mediterranien muslim people. you loser european gypsies.
@mgokalparslan & u call me stupid? u fucking dumb bitch there is no evidence that Maltese are of stupid goatfucking muslim orgin u dumb bitch, this is a bullshit myth, besides when muslim came took our island we always kicked u fucks out. Throughout Maltese history Malta never ever saw u fucks as brethren but as outsiders. So because the Spanish Conquistadores conquered many of the americas, u believe that the natives are Spanish? u fucking nut, go wrap urself in a bedsheet & go blow urself up.
you fucki stup bullshit and write the genetics of maltese people. they are a mixture of africans, middle easterns and europeans, you can see this by looking any maltese face. i didn't say they are muslim i say they have the same roots with middle eastern's muslim people (when they were not muslims) and similar features. if it's not so, who are they? germanic or british ??
@mgokalparslan Yes roots u fucking idiot, first of all 1st settlers in Malta came from the north & not from the south in around 5,200 BC u fucking imbecille, the phoenicians, carthaginians, arabs & all that came much after. & throughout our whole history Malta had clearly been inhabited & possessed more by Europeans than middle-easterns or africans & u have absolutly zero idea how a Maltese looks else u wouldn't said such a bullcrap. Our faces, features, skin are much linked to italians
@YUSKHAN u fucking ugly stinking flat-faced good-for-nothing fucks never even came close to take Rome when u had an empire, cos we stopped u, defeated u & sent u fucks back licking ur wounds. how can u possibly take it now? just a handful of my countrymen & knights slaughtered 28,000 of u fucks in 1 of ur many attempts to sieze Malta, let alone taking Rome itself.. Can't u fucks be more stupid than u are? u pretend ur tough when ur best troops of ur best times were sons of Christian Europeans.
what happened to the Knights of Rhodes they were butchered by the the Jannnisary core, we are coming form Rome and we are going to destroy the Vatican and build mega mosques on top of it, just like we did in Constantinople ha ha just keep praying ashole we coming for the disbelieve
@YUSKHAN (1) rhodes? haha are u fucking seruious? the eachtime hopelessly outnumbered knights on Rhodes won 2 of 3 sieges & slaughtered up to 90,000 turks & egyptians in all 3 sieges, before finally surrendering with honor in 1522 cos even suleiman was fucking impressed with their heroic actions & let them go, not slaughtered as u idiot wished & said. 1st the Mamliuk fleet siege of 1444 by egypt, 2nd in 1480 by ottomans & the 3rd was that of 1522.
@YUSKHAN (2) It was they who slaughtered the turks, & turks took Rhodes at a terrible cost from this handful of men, cos the knights hospitallers never exceeded more than 5-600 knights & swelling to 7-8,000 with brothers, mercenaries or allies u idiot, whereas ottomans in most sieges numbered some 100-150,000 & more. At Malta the same, a handful of knights & 5,000 Maltese slaghtered 28,000 of 48,000 ottoman invasion. How can u say that TURKS SLAUGHTERED THE KNIGHTS? when evry knight was worth 50
@YUSKHAN (3) of ur shitty janissaries. & Constantinople? haha u fucks outnumbered them by fucking 20 to 1.. 200,000 vs only 7,000, u r nothing but a bunch of UNWANTED monkey badloosing assholes. U NEVER even will come close to rome cos soon we'r gonna fuck u muslim cunts out of Europe like our forefathers did 3 fucking times. How many times in battles & sieges just a few Europeans defeated a much larger muslim army? i can start mentioning them one after the other THAT IS ALL U FUCKS ARE..
@YUSKHAN (4) WORTHLESS SCUMBAGS FEEL ONLY CONFIDENT BY SWARMS OF ILLETTERAT MONKEYS. now fuck off u & ur pisslam. keep pissing off the west, Europe & the jews even more so that we will nuke fucking mecca, medina & all the fucking middle-east shithole monkeys & send u shitfucks where u belong. U WILL NEVER TAKE US, U NEVER HAD & U NEVER WILL u fucks only live among us out of our good will, but ppl are waking up, slowly but surely & patriots WILL REPLACE TRAITORS & U'LL ALL BE DEPORTED BY FORCE.
@YUSKHAN u fucking idiot, u clearly showed u know nothing then about the knights of st.john cos throughout the 3 sieges of rhodes in 1444, 1480 & 1522 between these few hundred knights & 100s of 1,000s of turks & egyptians in each invasion, the knights of st.John butchered up to 90,000 muslims including many many of ur faggot janissaries got fucked, at Malta 500 knights alongside some 5,000 Maltese militia butchered another 28,000 of turkish fucks including 4,000 from the 6,000 janissaries sent.
@YUSKHAN (1) they where what? u fucktard the knights of st.John fought in 3 invasions of rhodes & beaten off 2. 1st by 20,000 mamluks in 1444 vs only 5-7,000 knights & burgundians & the 2nd by 70-100,000 ottomans in 1480 vs only 3,500 knights & men. During the fall of Rhodes in 1522, another 100,000 turks vs 7,000 knights & men, ur sickfucking janissaries got slaughtered evrytime they attacked the walls. & the knights were let go by sultan. in all 3 sieges they slaughtered 90,000 muslims u fuck.
@YUSKHAN (2) this little order of st.john that never numbered no more than 600 knights max & 3,000 brothers was able to slaughter countless of ur pisslamic fucks, ur so proud of. & what about Malta? just 500 knights & 5,000 Maltese militia slaughtered 28,000 from the 48,000 ottoman invasion of 1565? U KNOW SHIT ABOUT UR OWN HISTORY LET ALONE THE KNIGHT'S. what about by sea battles? they sunk, captured & destroyed much of the ottoman's, barbary corsair's & moorish ships. COME, WE'LL FUCK U ALL UP
@YUSKHAN (3) u pisslamic fucks think u can just take on evrywhere because of ur numbers? ITS NOT THE QUANTITY THAT COUNTS, BUT THE QUALITY U PISSLAMIC FUCK, something u backward fucks never ever had. fuck off u & ur pisslamic wetdreams of mohammad's pedophile wedding & pisslamic world. U WILL EAT SHIT & DIE BEFORE THAT HAPPENS. start a war, with europe & the west so that we see u crying & braging all the time of sufferring , like u always do in other wars. No allah u akbar then u sick mofo.
@Suppressingfire i suggest you stop worrying on so called christian powers fighting so called muslim powers, and to worry about the Life after this temporal one. you have no idea what you are saying when you utter such words. The Creator withdraws His Mercy from the enemies of Muhammad al-Mustafa.
@syf567 oh yeah? Muhammad al-Mustafa? how can that be when ur precious muhammad was an enemy of evryone even to muslims at some points? he wiped out entire tribes off the map, turning ppl against their own like khalid bin walid & others, personally beheaded countless Christians & Jews, ordering ppl get nailed in their eyes & slitting girl's throats for singing poems against him, he raped children & had incests Sex with his own family members. U MEAN THE CREATOR WILL FORGIVE EVRYONE EXCEPT HIM.
@Suppressingfire what great Lies and Blasphemies you said. no wonder you are a product of christian missionary distortion of facts. and even if that was not the case, many of these "stories" come from unreliable sources who the authors themselves (ibn ishaq, al-tabari etc.) say they should not be taken as reliable. other things you said are outright lies.
@Suppressingfire in any case you did not even attempt to give any source for your lies against the Messenger of God, so there isnt a point in me answering you
One should note that there is large relation between the island of Malta and the island of Ios in Greece (also known as Little Malta). Relatives of La Valette sailing towards the holy lands found a shelter at the island of Ios due to its natural port protecting from all the winds. There are still inhabitants with a surname of Valetas (for those who are aware of Greek History, Spyridon Valetas, member of the so called "Friendly Company", helped much during and prior the Greek Revolution of 1821).
Just finished reading an a first hand accounting of the siege by FRancisco Balbi di Correggio. Makes incredible reading, and although all sorts of praises go to the Knights, he did acceed that many Maltese fought well, many thousands of Maltese died at the hands of the Muslims.
@1stREMESquaddie Yes Balbi di Coreggio gives the best account of the great siege, its true without the Knights Malta would have fallen but still the Maltese were some 7,000 out of 9,000 defenders & did much of it & fought stubbornly for evry inch. Balbi's account is the most detailed also cos he was there a Spanish Mercenary Arquebusier. Not because its concerns my country's history but the great siege really fascinates me, the level of ferocity in the fighting by both sides was alarmingly high
The turks had to bow down to the Maltese! They suffered defeat and shame on there honour! The musulm empire was weak and not strong as the chrstians. MALTA had totally owned the muslm thanks to the knights of st.john. The turks have never excepted it , and it is in history. MALTA the small island owned the turks
its amazing to me how few europeans know anything about the muslim crusades that went all the way into austria or the taking of euripean slaves to north africa where you still see arabs with blue eyes to this day. now they welcome the muslims to their lands with welfare and free housing so they can finish the job, all for some oil money and votes for the liberalruling class of the eu
@laosuwan u'r amazed cos Europeans learned knowlage throughout history & u guys don't cos most of u just believe all what imams & sheiks tell u & don't even try to learn thats why u'll stay stupid. blue eyes? so u think ppl traveled & races mixed only by islam's slaves? Greeks & Macedonians conquered & ruled the whole east much before islam, Romans, British, Spanish, German & French empires conquered countries from all corners of the world & left their seed besides Europe had muslim slaves also.
@Nickname997 U SHOULD STOP COS A TINY LITTLE ISLAND FUCKED 28000 OF UR 48000 OTTOMAN INVADING DIPSHITS U FUCKING IDIOT. The so-called stupid ottoman faggots got defeated & humiliated by a few 100s knights & maltese farmers u ignorant dumbfuck. i get it, historians from all over wrote what i'm saying & u wanna argure with them?? or u say western historians & knights are liers & muslims are honest? cos that usual bullshit is what u fucks allways say when u don't find words to close the argument.
@Nickname997 yes thats what sounds great isn't it? JUST A TINY ROCK IN THE MEDITERRANEAN WITH ITS LIMITED RESOURSES & FEW KNIGHTS, MERCINARIES & PEASANTS STOPPED, DEFEATED & TURNED BACK THE SO-CALLED MIGHTY OTTOMAN EMPIRE FROM MALTA. & what about MIGHTY SPAIN? u feared Spain as ur worst nightmare cos it was ur counterpart , but not have SLAVE ARMIES just real dedicated men. NOW PISS OF if ur gonna be an asshole & when u don't like what u read u fall on the same, usual muslim bullshit LIES.
@Nickname997 WRONG AGAIN U IDIOTIC SHIT, so u are PROVING that u never to some time to read how the ottomans were defeated at Malta lol. YES u idiot they fought the last battle out in the open fields at Naxxar. The turks had already embarked for but suleiman heard that the reliefe force was smalled than they thought so he disembarked the turks again. The gran soccorso waited on Naxxar highgrounds & the Mdina 100 cavalry garrison waited at mdina gates also.
@Suppressingfire@Suppressingfire when turks disembarked for battle again the gran soccorso knights CHARGED WITHOUT ORDERS at the turks & mdina knights charged the same & ur so called heroes ran before they even got outflanked. Also before the final battle on the 7th of august the turks assaulted again both forts at once to stretch the defenders & at one point they were gonna break through untill 100 garrison cavalry knifghts stationed at mdina charged at the marsa camp & saved the day.
@Nickname997 u really need to either go learn some history or shut the fuck up & quit being a turkish dipshit. the defenders at Malta were few not because that was needed but thats all that Malta had. u Turkish BADLOOSERS when u win a victory u shout Glory & when u loose u say ITS ALL LIES & BULLSHIT like fucking 6 year old crying" i wanna win, i wanna win" waaaaa waaaa. admit LIKE A REAL MAN that determined ppl of Christian Europe halted u & send u back to turkey, just like we admit our losses
Turkish armies were not bigger always but christian sources make propoganda against Turks, they cant accept their defeat.
The population of Europe was much bigger than Ottoman Empire but how can the Ottomans then have in every battle 100.000 soldiers and in every battle half is killed and this happens every 10 years. What a fantasy.
@Nickname997 why don't u mention Christian European Victories after Malta over ur ottoman pussies at the battle of Slankamen 1691, 2nd battle of Mochas 1687,Battle of Zenta 1697, battle of Petrovardin 1716, 2nd Siege of Vienna 1683 (the 1st Vienna also also 1529), Siege of Eger 1552, the battle of Lepanto 1571, the battle of st.Gotthard 1664, the battle of Sisak 1593 & so on? U know shit just dipshit tales told to u from some old fool instead of distinguished historians, writers & biographers.
Your a bunch of barbarians that like to steal land and kill people who are not muslim.You have hate and greed in your hearts and ideas of a glorious new Ottoman empire.Once your true intentions are reaveled even the true liberal left will begin to see you are a threat to freedoms that people of the west enjoy.
@Nickname997 u don't even know how much knights hospitallers, mercenaries, peasants & u wanna fucking speak from ur arse. For ur information the biggest number of fighters in the great siege were Maltese ppl u idiot 7000-8000, knights hospitallers just 500 at the begining of the siege, 2000 mercenaries from italy & greece & were reinforced by another 4000 later. The spanish u speak of were only less than a 1000 & most of them came during the gran soccorso AT THE END OF THE SIEGE, .
@Suppressingfire the victory always belonged to the knights of st .john & Maltese ppl & not to the few 100s spanish as u say (with all respect to spain) there where so few men near the turks that even able galley slaves were ordered to fight.
@nachopulp Spanish? only 200 Spanish were in the siege if u are talking about the reliefe force that fought the last naxxar battle it didn't fight the battle by their own, cos the knights cavalry of Mdina outflanke the turks, 2ndly during that time the turks were already broken had embarked & only disembarked again when the reliefe force wasn't as big as they thought & 3rd Malta with its few 8000 dfenders withstood the whole siege. Praise goes to the Knights & the Maltese ppl not to the Spanish.
@Suppressingfire Yeah, it was all politics. You'd think that the entire Catholic side of Christendom would have sent serious numbers of men to defend somewhere as strategic as Malta.
But oh no, they saw The Knights as a kind of " foreign legion " not to be trusted. France had a non aggression agreement with Constantinople, if I'm right.
@Noodles37UK It wasn't that France thought the Knights are not to be trusted, cos 1st of all half the order were French but the reason France didn't even give a hand was cos France was an ally of the Ottomans during that time, during those times France was an ally of Europe's arch enemy. No one, except Spain & the Pope, wanted to help Malta, they simply thought its useless to send prescious men to a rock that the ottomans of suleiman are gonna crush it under their heels, how wrong were they..
@nachopulp Alvaro de Bazan didn't play a key role but he only joined the gran soccorso reliefe force ships that brought 4000 fresh troops which most were spanish commanded by Ascano de la Corna but when these came the turks were already broken & strated embarking, they fought again in the last battle cos it was smaller than thought & still the Cavalry Knights of Mdina flanked them & some began to run even before flanked. Thats very different from ''if it wasn't for alvaro malta would fall".
Do you really think that receving 4000 fresh troops and provisions after months of siege was not crucial? Alvaro de Bazan did it. It's a fact that the Spanish relief opened a second front against the Turks. The 6th of Sept of 1565, when the Turks began to reembark into the galleys to face the coming armada, was the moment that the besieged used to charge against the Turks. The Turk galleys that were able to face the coming armada suffred heavy losses at sea.
@nachopulp I did not say it wasn't crucial but u need to see the fact that those reinforcements were promised at the beginning of the siege came when the turks were broken & Alvaro is not the hero of the siege, La Valette is, & u'r wrong cos the final battle of the reliefe force wasn't at sea but on land near naxxar hills & they still didn't fight the turks alone cos the cavalry knights of mdina charged & outflanked them. Ascano de la corna was commanding the reliefe force on land.
@nachopulp don't get me wrong cos i love Spain & Spanish history & heroes but credit doesn't go to the Spanish but to the knights of st.john & the Maltese ppl. The turks were already broken & started retreating to their ships when the gran soccorso arrived & they still weren't all spanish but most of them. The only reason the turks disembarked again & fought a last ditch battle was cos they still outnumbered the Christians but their best officers & half the invading was already dead in the siege
@nachopulp yes there were thousands of spanish troops in the islands as part of the garrison. the credit for the heroic defence and patriotic war goes to hospitallers, maltese, spanish, italian, and greek forces. however, the vast majority of the defenders were maltese troops. as to the final help in september, the ottoman army was already beaten they had no hope of penetrating the defences. they had made many assaults and got nothing expet dead men. they lost 8000 on st elmo only!!
@ivaflimkien My Mum is from Valetta. There was a uselessly bloody battle in Saint Paul's Bay right at the very end . I have Correggio's account ( although haven't read it). I've read Bradford's brilliant book though. Malta was saved by a bluff that 16,000 Europeans were coming to her aid. Malta succeeded where the Byzantines failed. The Moslems were truly worn out.
@Nickname997 Do u know how much stupid u sound, in the camp? the knights observed all around from the forts. turks were all over Marsa, mount schibberras (valletta), tigne, manoel island, msida,outside bigru, bighi, outside senglea & santa margeritha when the few defenders held the the then small city of mdina, the penninsula forts of st.michael senglea, fort st. angelo birgu, & fort fort st.elmo valletta but st.elmo fell after 30 days. the turks lost 25-28000 including 4000 janissaries.
@Nickname997 The turks u shout of couldn't take Malta when it was just trees & fields with just 4 little forts let alone what could they do after the siege when la vallette fortified 50 times stronger. During the siege they even killed the famous Turkish General/admiral of the corsairs Dragut, they killed the general Aga of the janissaries, the turkish ordinance commander & many other lower ranking but distinguished officers. Malta wityhstood & 2nd & more destructive siege in ww2 from luftwaffe
@Nickname997 The very words of Lala Kara Mustafa Pasha, overall commander of the turks in malta "Oh Allah, if the son had cost us much, what price shall we have to pay for the father?" speaking of Birgu & Senglea after st.elmo fell. 200 garrison at st.elmo held for 30 day before it fell & fought to the death & took with them 6000 of their best. What the hell do u know about Malta History? Malta with the helb of the British even besieged & kicked out 3,500 garrison French of Napoleon & ww2 also
@Nickname997 A quick check on the net has the numbers at 48000 to 6000 against the Hospitallers, even with the reinforecements they only amounted to approx 14,000. I would be happy to stand corrected upon you supplying your reference source.
@Nickname997 thats bullshit , malta had only 4 little forts if u check well the defenses in 1565. La vallette made the well fortified cities after the siege when suleiman threatened to besiege it himself. & check out history accounts of turkish numbers from ppl who were there fighting not some modern historian's ideas, Francesco Balbi di Coreccgio gave the most detailed accounts about the siege 38,000 turks came first & reinforced by another 10000 from algiers, tripoli & other muslim corsairs.
@Nickname997 & u mentioned firepower lol, i laugh at you the Ottomans had the greatest guns, bombards, mortars & basilisks at the time more than anyone else, don't confuse Malta's defences from before the siege to after it, during the siege all malta had was crappy small cannons they brought with them from Rhodes 30 years earlier. The Turkish guns reduced evrywhere to dust. sry mate but u know NOTHING about the great siege of 1565, u just can't stomach that some knights & farmers defeated turks.
@Nickname997 the knights were just a fraction near the ottomans they were just a few 1000s near the whole ottoman empire, EXEGERATE? u should say muslim never admit defeat. but u should also know the the few knights & maltese farmers sunk & captured many ottoman galleys & ships in naval battles, for ur info the few knight HALTED THE OTTOMAN ADVANCE FROM THE MEDITERRANEAN. where the hell do u get ur so-called history? DON'T BELIEVBE ME U SHOULDN'T, BUT AT LEAST GO READ ABOUT THEM BEFORE U SPEAK.
@Nickname997 thats funny u wanna compare the few 100s knights hospitallers & their limited resourses with ottomans on riches, men power, Bombards, basilisks,mortars,cannons, ships & so on? the most important thing that i am Maltaese i'm proud to tell u that we small ppl, & a few knights slaughtered ottomans dipshits like rabbits, outnumbered 5-1 & their remains returned home at night by order of suleiman so that they would the ppl won't watch defeated champions of islam by a few peasants.
@Nickname997 Turks for ur info have a whole history outnumbering the enemy in many many of their battles, where's the glory in that 200,000 against 7000 in constantinople, 100,000 agaisnt a few 1000 peasants at the siege of eger, both vienna sieges, Lepanto & so on. Turks my arse all they were is barbarians raping , looting & killing peasants. lol i'm sure u don't even know that the best turkish troops 'the janissaries' were mostly sons of christians & a slave army.
@Nickname997 ottomans vs. malta was 90%-10%. it was the disagreements between the three ottoman naval commanders and the sultan gave way to tactical mistakes.
i think kingdom of heaven is an excellent movie its one of my favorites but the historical inaccuracy in it really bugs me and it did seem more one sided towards the muslims
the bastard that made kingdom of heaven promised that he would make the great siege of malta and lied and made kingdom of heaven. anyways great vid! ive been to that museum its incredible
Tnkx bro :) did he? Ridley Scott eh? If he made the Kingdom of Heaven more favorable on the Christian side instead of showing christians battling eachother, christian jealousy, christian killing civilians, christian defeats & historical inaccuracy, i think he would have done a great job. I know that most of it happened, but why show only the bad things? Thats why i hate kingdom of heaven, cos it starts & ends with shameful acts of christians & victorious muslims.
@JulianThePhilosopher i don't mean i hate the film cos its medieval scense r great but other scense annoy me like when balian was all alone in the desert & 4-5 Teutonic Knights in armour & swords, shields, flails, lance came & he kills them all lol, especially the last knight punched balian with his mail glove, then a header with his helm which they will surly put him out of his sences but balian steals his dagger & stuck it in his visor then balian dies & the hospitaller brings him back to life
@JulianThePhilosopher yeah thats true, especially in the last scene, where saladin apparently just lets all the defenders and citizens of jeruesalem go home no catches. However the truth was he set a price in silver for their freedom, and those who could not pay up were enslaved, and a scribe who's name escapes me, wrote about the mass rape of women afterwards, I know it wasn't as bad as slaughtering entire populace like christians did, but it was still wrong, and typical of "religion of peace"
I really really wish they make the Great siege of Malta 1565 a film, but if they ever make one i hope they will not ruin it with a bunch historical errors like they usually do. They made many films of smaller battles & sieges, why won't they do the Malta Great siege? against all odds, hopelessly outnumbered & facing the Conquering Ottoman Empire army of Suleiman the Magnificent.
This was one hell of a brutal and bloody siege!! It would make a great movie actually to pay tribute to the bravery and courage of those involved in the defence.
Grand Master Valette of the Knights of St John said to the Ottomans, "We Christians will fight to the death and take you with us."
At 1st Mustafa got so pissed that swore to kill evry single one including the Maltese fighters once they won, weeks later, knowing its not that easy he changed his mind & demanded 'Honourable Surrender'. When Mustafa's slave told this to La valette, he replied "Tell ur master There is the only territory i will give him. There lies the land he may have for his own" & showed the slave a huge ditch full of twisted,rotting & roasted janissary bodies.
Military training was immediately imposed on the Maltese population. Some old people and women were encouraged to go to Sicily to be safe. Measures were taken to ensure adequate supplies of corn from Sicily. The defence force consisted of some 9,000 men, which included some 600 Knights and 8,000 local military force.
CommonPurpose1 3 weeks ago
In 1557 La Valette was elected for Grandmaster of the Order of St. John. His experience was going to prove useful to the Order and the Maltese during the Great Siege. La Vallette was the first one to start urging for preparation for the coming Siege. His intuition was proved correct!
CommonPurpose1 3 weeks ago
La Vallette, who had become a Knight at eighteen years of age, was a courageous soldier. He could speak Italian, Spanish, Greek and Turkish. This was obviously too the Order's advantage. When La Vallette became the Admiral of the Order's fleet, he caught Kust Ali in 1554, and sent him to row in the galleys. La Vallette was a powerful leader in battle. When the ships under his command used to attack they always would win
CommonPurpose1 3 weeks ago
@CommonPurpose1 i think la vallette at one time was also a galley slave
1225MAGNA 3 weeks ago
In October 1564 rumours reached Malta from the Ottoman Empire of a planned attack on Malta. The French Grandmaster Jean Parisot De La Vallette recalled to the Convent (the headquarters of the Knights in "Birgu") all the Knights who were living abroad and appealed for help in the preparations for the coming siege.
CommonPurpose1 3 weeks ago
For the attack on Malta of 1565, the Turkish Sultan Soleyman sent again his general Dragut. However, this time he was to be helped by two admirals: Admiral Piali Pasha was to be in charge of the fleet, while Admiral Mustapha Pasha was to be in command of the army. On the other hand, the Order of St. John was to be led by Grandmaster Jean Parisot De La Vallette, with the backing of the Pope and the Holy Roman Emperor.
CommonPurpose1 3 weeks ago
Turkish Sultan, had let the Order leave peacefully from Rhodes; after the Knights settled in Malta in 1530, they still continued attacking Turkish ships around the Mediterranean. Therefore, Soleyman was getting very annoyed with the losses his empire was suffering. Moreover, he was also unhappy about the fact that when one of his best generals, Dragut, attacked the Maltese Islands in 1551, he did not succeed in invading Malta and defeating the Knights
CommonPurpose1 3 weeks ago
We Maltese are proud we defeated the muzlim rats the ottoman empire, we then gave another lesson to hitler, HAHAHAHAHAHA. THK U GOD OF ISRAEL
TheJasonking 1 month ago
AWESOME!
Loved it! The soundtrack is perfect, too!
DaniLeeRideoutCasha 1 month ago
GREETINGS FROM SERBIA
+ C C C C +
MegaMikss 1 month ago
we maltese are brave persons fuck the ottomans the only point is that we won we have great history and don t forget we wher blessed by our gog it was a miracle to win against 60,000 go and learn history who said against malta
jonathan21436114 1 month ago
SOME SAY TO THEIR WISHFULL THINKING THAT THESE ARE TOY SOLDIERS,BUT MY FRIENDS WEATHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT THIS IS HISTORY,THE OTTOMAN GENERAL WAS KILLED IN TINY MALTA.REMEMBER ONLY THIS 5000 MALTESE,500 KNIGHTS AND A BRAVE GRAND MASTER JEAN DE LA VALLETTE DAFEATED AN ARMY OF 30,OOO OTTOMANS.WE WERE BESIEGED FOR 3 MONTHS BY THAN THE OTTOMANS RECIEVED AN OTHER 30,000 MORE=60,000 OTTOMANS AGAINST 600 BRAVE MALTESE,AND500 KNIGHTS,AND OUR BRAVE GRAND MASTER.I FORGOT TO NAME THE OTTOMAN GENERAL,PASHA
charlieborg1 3 months ago in playlist charlieborg1's favourites
Oh, please. Don't be so defensive. I just don't find this film either very informative, nor illuminating. I wasn't commenting on, or taking sides in a historical battle; nor do I feel sorry for the Ottomans. But if you want to play with your toy soldiers, part-time historical enactors, and (to my mind) rather bombastically loud music, please go ahead. It's a free world but if you post a film and invite comments why are you so defensive if someone is not so impressed by it? It's narcissism.
peyiots 5 months ago
@peyiots if u would spend more time thinking & less time being a total asshole maybe u would fucking notice that THIS IS NOT A DOCUMENTARY U FUCKING IDIOT, this is a music tribute vid, now if ur so stupid that u don't even know such vids exist then just shut ur fucking mouth, if ur gonna act like a total dickhead. If u want info on history go buy some books or read history accounts on history sites not on some yt tribute vid. TO YOUR MIND? unfortunatly for u i don't give a shit of u or ur mind.
Suppressingfire 5 months ago
@peyiots now fuck off
Suppressingfire 5 months ago
This is not really a documentary. It has no text, it is accompanied by a rather tiring, strident, pseudo, and overblown music which is also too loud and comes across as a bit of post-historical staging with diisneyworld extras. Sorry mate; too bombastic. Stick to commercials for toy soldiers and airfix models.
peyiots 5 months ago
@peyiots WHO THE HELL TOLD YOU THIS IS A DOCUMENTARY??? you just tried to make a fool of others but overlooked the fact that you'r making a fool of yourself only. For text all you needed to do is read the freakin text in the discription. If u feel sorry for the ottoman dickheads cos they got humiliated by a handful of knights & farmers its fine, but don't try to paint it as something else especially when u got nothing to prove. IDIOT.
Suppressingfire 5 months ago
i would have loved to give my life there, wish i stood in the heroic defense of fort sint-elmo
thebiest100 6 months ago
@Suppressingfire The siege of Malta, or perhaps more fitting; The embarassment of the Ottomans despite odds of almost ten to one in their favour, remains fact forever. Don't be bothered or get irritated by the rantings of someone quoting authors that are obviously biased. "Speak not in the ears of a fool: for he will despise the wisdom of thy words." Proverbs 23:9 from the source pre-dating all other claims of "Christhood" and contact with God. If that isn't satisfying, compare the contenders.
newcamper 6 months ago
@newcamper well said mate, i couldn't have said it any better :)
Suppressingfire 6 months ago
@seahorseofvenice chapter 19 verse 28 is not literal, "sister of Aaron" means that Mary was a descendant of Aaron (as). Paran and Bacca in the Bible are the hedjaz and that area, and Mecca, and the Bible clearly speaks of Ismael and his mother going to Paran.
syf567 6 months ago
@seahorseofvenice what have you said about the Quran is just speculation with no proof. the Quran is the most authentic scripture from all the religions today. the variations in early Quranic manuscripts which were discovered are so minimal, that they are basically negligible.
syf567 6 months ago
@seahorseofvenice we Maltese don't have much from arabs except a part of our language, cos our language comes from Italian, Greek, French, Latin & Arabic ,so its not an arabic language either. Sry but i think u misunderstood me, i never said the Romans mixed ppl with Carthaginians, i said we Maltese aided the Romans to get us rid of the Carthaginians during the 2nd punic war, cos malta was under carthage before romans came. & i never said berbers are arabs, of course not, why u say that? ;)
Suppressingfire 7 months ago
@seahorseofvenice Yes it does, Thats why i'm proud of the Maltese Islands & of course we Maltese are not arabs, whoever thinks that is a retard. Turks are not arabs either, turks come from somewhere near china & from mongolia. But i mentioned arabs cos muslim arab fatimids did invade our islands some 700-800 years before the muslim ottoman turks did & by God's Grace, both were kicked out.
Suppressingfire 7 months ago
@seahorseofvenice yes thats very true, evrything u said.. the Normans were a Godsend to us, cos together we were able to kick the arabs out for good. Besides the italian & sicilian banishments to Malta, Malta was under Roman & the later Roman-Byzantine protection, from the 2nd punic war in the 200s BC, when we aided them to get us rid of the Carthaginians, all the way to the 800s AD. Malta never looked to Romans as our invaders but our Liberators, just as the Normans, the Knights & the British.
Suppressingfire 7 months ago
@seahorseofvenice izlam belongs to satan, muhamad is the biggest pervert in world history
TheJasonking 7 months ago
a debate by amateur historians all based upon wishful thinking. Belief and no need to rationalize anything. But if God is Great, He is above such rationalizations, can not have dictated such books, and is also above religious wars. People fight because they want land, power, riches, slaves, and always find reasons to rationalize such desires. Because God has promised this land to us, because God hates infidels, not created by Him but by a rival god perhaps from another universe. Etc
siinantara 8 months ago
@siinantara people also fight for DEFENCE of land, heritage, religion etc. Tell me something if no one defends christianity just because the gospel preaches "love thy enemies" do u think christianity or anyother religion for that matter, will survive?? the gospel also preaches "an eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth". If u love ur family i assume ur ready to fight to defend them from harm. Throughout history muslims already attempted to conquer & islamise the world 3 times, & now they'r on the 4th
Suppressingfire 8 months ago
we are maltese, we are brave
davidsal98 9 months ago
@seahorseofvenice the fact that there never were variances in the recitations of the Prophet Muhammad shows that all this was not coming from the mind but from divine revelation, and that the Kuran was being preserved in Muhammad by God, not by the human mind. had there been any variances the public would have recognized them.
syf567 9 months ago
@seahorseofvenice the hebrew and christian scriptures were not readily available to the common people, as the writing and preservation of scriptures was done by the scribes and scholars, not a public or popular thing. The Messenger of God recited the revelations publicly, and the verses of the Kuran spread out, were recited and memorized publicly by his followers. it is impossible that the religion was "pieced together" as you say, while the people remained unaware.
syf567 9 months ago
@seahorseofvenice exactly..
Suppressingfire 10 months ago
... this prophecy is very very important. who according to you is That Prophet who is 1) like Moses a.s., and 2)is raised from among the brethren of the Israelites ? do you know who the brethren of the Israelites are, christian?
syf567 10 months ago
also, since christians believe that there is no prophet after Jesus, can you tell me who the jews were waiting for in John 1:20, when they asked John the Baptist are you 1) the Messiah 2) Elijah 3) THAT PROPHET? So besides the Messiah there was also Elijah and That Prophet. actually christians go on to say that That Prophet is the One referred to in Deuteronomy 18:15-18, and actually deuteronomy18 is the verses on which the 9th of the Jewish laws (613 mitzvot) is based? so you can see that ...
syf567 10 months ago
...a) believing that there is no god but God and the Unity/Oneness of God 2) repenting to God and worshipping ONLY THE One God. So according to you the Prophets before Jesus who i hope you believe in, were all wrong and their revelation war wrong?!! (God forbid)
syf567 10 months ago
1. where does Jesus say he is a god in the gospels? 2. where does Jesus say that salvation comes from the cross or from his sacrifice, in the gospels? 3.where does ANYWHERE in Torah or Gospels say that salvation comes from believing in the cross or death and resurrection of Jesus, in order to obtain salvation and the expiation of sins? 3. How do you as a christian reconcile the fact that the Messengers from God believed in the Oneness of God and that atonement comes from ...
syf567 10 months ago
I see you are hating again. Please, get a life, quit dreaming of another crusade, set aside early Christian teachings and make up a better solution than nuking people. Perhaps you can finally stop fellating the Pope's phallus.
gandalfph 11 months ago
You have to understand christianity evolved compared to what happen back in the crusades.The true teaching of christ was always about love,justice, peace, long suffering.It was always in the bible, if christian relgions commited acts against humanity in the name of god, well they were wrong.I have to say also in the bible, one has the right to defend himself,so that means we aint gonna be your bitch, if you attack our western society.I see alot of muslims from comments want Ottoman empire back..
kyriacos40 11 months ago
stupid malta person. you hate muslims so much but your and all the people of malta share the same origin with that mediterranien muslim people. you loser european gypsies.
mgokalparslan 1 year ago
@mgokalparslan & u call me stupid? u fucking dumb bitch there is no evidence that Maltese are of stupid goatfucking muslim orgin u dumb bitch, this is a bullshit myth, besides when muslim came took our island we always kicked u fucks out. Throughout Maltese history Malta never ever saw u fucks as brethren but as outsiders. So because the Spanish Conquistadores conquered many of the americas, u believe that the natives are Spanish? u fucking nut, go wrap urself in a bedsheet & go blow urself up.
Suppressingfire 11 months ago
@Suppressingfire
you fucki stup bullshit and write the genetics of maltese people. they are a mixture of africans, middle easterns and europeans, you can see this by looking any maltese face. i didn't say they are muslim i say they have the same roots with middle eastern's muslim people (when they were not muslims) and similar features. if it's not so, who are they? germanic or british ??
mgokalparslan 11 months ago
@mgokalparslan Yes roots u fucking idiot, first of all 1st settlers in Malta came from the north & not from the south in around 5,200 BC u fucking imbecille, the phoenicians, carthaginians, arabs & all that came much after. & throughout our whole history Malta had clearly been inhabited & possessed more by Europeans than middle-easterns or africans & u have absolutly zero idea how a Maltese looks else u wouldn't said such a bullcrap. Our faces, features, skin are much linked to italians
Suppressingfire 11 months ago
We are coming for Roma again, were coming for it!!!!! Ottoman empire for life!!!!!!!!
YUSKHAN 1 year ago
@YUSKHAN u fucking ugly stinking flat-faced good-for-nothing fucks never even came close to take Rome when u had an empire, cos we stopped u, defeated u & sent u fucks back licking ur wounds. how can u possibly take it now? just a handful of my countrymen & knights slaughtered 28,000 of u fucks in 1 of ur many attempts to sieze Malta, let alone taking Rome itself.. Can't u fucks be more stupid than u are? u pretend ur tough when ur best troops of ur best times were sons of Christian Europeans.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
what happened to the Knights of Rhodes they were butchered by the the Jannnisary core, we are coming form Rome and we are going to destroy the Vatican and build mega mosques on top of it, just like we did in Constantinople ha ha just keep praying ashole we coming for the disbelieve
YUSKHAN 1 year ago
@YUSKHAN (1) rhodes? haha are u fucking seruious? the eachtime hopelessly outnumbered knights on Rhodes won 2 of 3 sieges & slaughtered up to 90,000 turks & egyptians in all 3 sieges, before finally surrendering with honor in 1522 cos even suleiman was fucking impressed with their heroic actions & let them go, not slaughtered as u idiot wished & said. 1st the Mamliuk fleet siege of 1444 by egypt, 2nd in 1480 by ottomans & the 3rd was that of 1522.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@YUSKHAN (2) It was they who slaughtered the turks, & turks took Rhodes at a terrible cost from this handful of men, cos the knights hospitallers never exceeded more than 5-600 knights & swelling to 7-8,000 with brothers, mercenaries or allies u idiot, whereas ottomans in most sieges numbered some 100-150,000 & more. At Malta the same, a handful of knights & 5,000 Maltese slaghtered 28,000 of 48,000 ottoman invasion. How can u say that TURKS SLAUGHTERED THE KNIGHTS? when evry knight was worth 50
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@YUSKHAN (3) of ur shitty janissaries. & Constantinople? haha u fucks outnumbered them by fucking 20 to 1.. 200,000 vs only 7,000, u r nothing but a bunch of UNWANTED monkey badloosing assholes. U NEVER even will come close to rome cos soon we'r gonna fuck u muslim cunts out of Europe like our forefathers did 3 fucking times. How many times in battles & sieges just a few Europeans defeated a much larger muslim army? i can start mentioning them one after the other THAT IS ALL U FUCKS ARE..
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@YUSKHAN (4) WORTHLESS SCUMBAGS FEEL ONLY CONFIDENT BY SWARMS OF ILLETTERAT MONKEYS. now fuck off u & ur pisslam. keep pissing off the west, Europe & the jews even more so that we will nuke fucking mecca, medina & all the fucking middle-east shithole monkeys & send u shitfucks where u belong. U WILL NEVER TAKE US, U NEVER HAD & U NEVER WILL u fucks only live among us out of our good will, but ppl are waking up, slowly but surely & patriots WILL REPLACE TRAITORS & U'LL ALL BE DEPORTED BY FORCE.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@YUSKHAN build a mosque on your stinking mums house you son of a bitch. long live catholicism it wipes the floor with muslims lawl
ivaflimkien 1 year ago
@YUSKHAN Hey, man, read my channel title.
EnlightenedShqiptar 11 months ago
@YUSKHAN u fucking idiot, u clearly showed u know nothing then about the knights of st.john cos throughout the 3 sieges of rhodes in 1444, 1480 & 1522 between these few hundred knights & 100s of 1,000s of turks & egyptians in each invasion, the knights of st.John butchered up to 90,000 muslims including many many of ur faggot janissaries got fucked, at Malta 500 knights alongside some 5,000 Maltese militia butchered another 28,000 of turkish fucks including 4,000 from the 6,000 janissaries sent.
Suppressingfire 11 months ago
@YUSKHAN (1) they where what? u fucktard the knights of st.John fought in 3 invasions of rhodes & beaten off 2. 1st by 20,000 mamluks in 1444 vs only 5-7,000 knights & burgundians & the 2nd by 70-100,000 ottomans in 1480 vs only 3,500 knights & men. During the fall of Rhodes in 1522, another 100,000 turks vs 7,000 knights & men, ur sickfucking janissaries got slaughtered evrytime they attacked the walls. & the knights were let go by sultan. in all 3 sieges they slaughtered 90,000 muslims u fuck.
Suppressingfire 7 months ago
@YUSKHAN (2) this little order of st.john that never numbered no more than 600 knights max & 3,000 brothers was able to slaughter countless of ur pisslamic fucks, ur so proud of. & what about Malta? just 500 knights & 5,000 Maltese militia slaughtered 28,000 from the 48,000 ottoman invasion of 1565? U KNOW SHIT ABOUT UR OWN HISTORY LET ALONE THE KNIGHT'S. what about by sea battles? they sunk, captured & destroyed much of the ottoman's, barbary corsair's & moorish ships. COME, WE'LL FUCK U ALL UP
Suppressingfire 7 months ago
@YUSKHAN (3) u pisslamic fucks think u can just take on evrywhere because of ur numbers? ITS NOT THE QUANTITY THAT COUNTS, BUT THE QUALITY U PISSLAMIC FUCK, something u backward fucks never ever had. fuck off u & ur pisslamic wetdreams of mohammad's pedophile wedding & pisslamic world. U WILL EAT SHIT & DIE BEFORE THAT HAPPENS. start a war, with europe & the west so that we see u crying & braging all the time of sufferring , like u always do in other wars. No allah u akbar then u sick mofo.
Suppressingfire 7 months ago
@Suppressingfire U mad?
MGreyWolfM 6 months ago
@Suppressingfire i suggest you stop worrying on so called christian powers fighting so called muslim powers, and to worry about the Life after this temporal one. you have no idea what you are saying when you utter such words. The Creator withdraws His Mercy from the enemies of Muhammad al-Mustafa.
syf567 6 months ago
@syf567 oh yeah? Muhammad al-Mustafa? how can that be when ur precious muhammad was an enemy of evryone even to muslims at some points? he wiped out entire tribes off the map, turning ppl against their own like khalid bin walid & others, personally beheaded countless Christians & Jews, ordering ppl get nailed in their eyes & slitting girl's throats for singing poems against him, he raped children & had incests Sex with his own family members. U MEAN THE CREATOR WILL FORGIVE EVRYONE EXCEPT HIM.
Suppressingfire 6 months ago
@Suppressingfire what great Lies and Blasphemies you said. no wonder you are a product of christian missionary distortion of facts. and even if that was not the case, many of these "stories" come from unreliable sources who the authors themselves (ibn ishaq, al-tabari etc.) say they should not be taken as reliable. other things you said are outright lies.
syf567 6 months ago
@Suppressingfire in any case you did not even attempt to give any source for your lies against the Messenger of God, so there isnt a point in me answering you
syf567 6 months ago
@syf567 the messenger of SHIT he was. the source IS UR SO-CALLED HOLY QURAN u fucking idiot.
Suppressingfire 6 months ago
@Suppressingfire dude, that coomment to yuskhan was fuckin' kingly and you deserve to be knighted for that :D Maltin ghal dejjem!!!!
ivaflimkien 1 year ago
@ivaflimkien Suppress go get Knighted and lead us to victory to get rid of these TURKGAY ASSHOLES
bombardus 7 months ago
@ivaflimkien hehehehe :) Long Live Roman Catholic Malta :)
Suppressingfire 7 months ago
One should note that there is large relation between the island of Malta and the island of Ios in Greece (also known as Little Malta). Relatives of La Valette sailing towards the holy lands found a shelter at the island of Ios due to its natural port protecting from all the winds. There are still inhabitants with a surname of Valetas (for those who are aware of Greek History, Spyridon Valetas, member of the so called "Friendly Company", helped much during and prior the Greek Revolution of 1821).
Plutonas78 1 year ago
@Plutonas78 tnkx for the info, i wasn't aware of that :) I have mad respect for Greece & its great history.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
Just finished reading an a first hand accounting of the siege by FRancisco Balbi di Correggio. Makes incredible reading, and although all sorts of praises go to the Knights, he did acceed that many Maltese fought well, many thousands of Maltese died at the hands of the Muslims.
1stREMESquaddie 1 year ago
@1stREMESquaddie Yes Balbi di Coreggio gives the best account of the great siege, its true without the Knights Malta would have fallen but still the Maltese were some 7,000 out of 9,000 defenders & did much of it & fought stubbornly for evry inch. Balbi's account is the most detailed also cos he was there a Spanish Mercenary Arquebusier. Not because its concerns my country's history but the great siege really fascinates me, the level of ferocity in the fighting by both sides was alarmingly high
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Suppressingfire
I guess you would also like another great siege story against the Turks.... The Siege of Castelnuovo. It was called the Spanish Termopilae
nachopulp 1 year ago
@1stREMESquaddie
Thanks for the info. Just ordered the book. Cheers!
nachopulp 1 year ago
The turks had to bow down to the Maltese! They suffered defeat and shame on there honour! The musulm empire was weak and not strong as the chrstians. MALTA had totally owned the muslm thanks to the knights of st.john. The turks have never excepted it , and it is in history. MALTA the small island owned the turks
tarxienfcsupporters 1 year ago
its amazing to me how few europeans know anything about the muslim crusades that went all the way into austria or the taking of euripean slaves to north africa where you still see arabs with blue eyes to this day. now they welcome the muslims to their lands with welfare and free housing so they can finish the job, all for some oil money and votes for the liberalruling class of the eu
laosuwan 1 year ago
@laosuwan u'r amazed cos Europeans learned knowlage throughout history & u guys don't cos most of u just believe all what imams & sheiks tell u & don't even try to learn thats why u'll stay stupid. blue eyes? so u think ppl traveled & races mixed only by islam's slaves? Greeks & Macedonians conquered & ruled the whole east much before islam, Romans, British, Spanish, German & French empires conquered countries from all corners of the world & left their seed besides Europe had muslim slaves also.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
Lol be proud to be Maltese.
you can have your siege
your propoganda
your victory
and your TINY island.
and put the farmers in your ass
I am stopping
because I know realised that people of malta are very obsessed and brainwashed with this siege.
Nickname997 1 year ago
@Nickname997 U SHOULD STOP COS A TINY LITTLE ISLAND FUCKED 28000 OF UR 48000 OTTOMAN INVADING DIPSHITS U FUCKING IDIOT. The so-called stupid ottoman faggots got defeated & humiliated by a few 100s knights & maltese farmers u ignorant dumbfuck. i get it, historians from all over wrote what i'm saying & u wanna argure with them?? or u say western historians & knights are liers & muslims are honest? cos that usual bullshit is what u fucks allways say when u don't find words to close the argument.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Nickname997 yes thats what sounds great isn't it? JUST A TINY ROCK IN THE MEDITERRANEAN WITH ITS LIMITED RESOURSES & FEW KNIGHTS, MERCINARIES & PEASANTS STOPPED, DEFEATED & TURNED BACK THE SO-CALLED MIGHTY OTTOMAN EMPIRE FROM MALTA. & what about MIGHTY SPAIN? u feared Spain as ur worst nightmare cos it was ur counterpart , but not have SLAVE ARMIES just real dedicated men. NOW PISS OF if ur gonna be an asshole & when u don't like what u read u fall on the same, usual muslim bullshit LIES.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
In every siege in the world history,
The defenders are fewer than the attackers because they are in a fortress they have advantage there is no need for more men than necessary
and they would starve very easily.
hehehe if Malta people defeated Turks very easily why did they hide in the castle?
they could make a battle in the open field.
Nickname997 1 year ago
@Nickname997 WRONG AGAIN U IDIOTIC SHIT, so u are PROVING that u never to some time to read how the ottomans were defeated at Malta lol. YES u idiot they fought the last battle out in the open fields at Naxxar. The turks had already embarked for but suleiman heard that the reliefe force was smalled than they thought so he disembarked the turks again. The gran soccorso waited on Naxxar highgrounds & the Mdina 100 cavalry garrison waited at mdina gates also.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Suppressingfire @Suppressingfire when turks disembarked for battle again the gran soccorso knights CHARGED WITHOUT ORDERS at the turks & mdina knights charged the same & ur so called heroes ran before they even got outflanked. Also before the final battle on the 7th of august the turks assaulted again both forts at once to stretch the defenders & at one point they were gonna break through untill 100 garrison cavalry knifghts stationed at mdina charged at the marsa camp & saved the day.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Nickname997 u really need to either go learn some history or shut the fuck up & quit being a turkish dipshit. the defenders at Malta were few not because that was needed but thats all that Malta had. u Turkish BADLOOSERS when u win a victory u shout Glory & when u loose u say ITS ALL LIES & BULLSHIT like fucking 6 year old crying" i wanna win, i wanna win" waaaaa waaaa. admit LIKE A REAL MAN that determined ppl of Christian Europe halted u & send u back to turkey, just like we admit our losses
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
Turkish armies were not bigger always but christian sources make propoganda against Turks, they cant accept their defeat.
The population of Europe was much bigger than Ottoman Empire but how can the Ottomans then have in every battle 100.000 soldiers and in every battle half is killed and this happens every 10 years. What a fantasy.
Nickname997 1 year ago
What it does it matter that Malta was a christian victory?
Turks conquered Cyprus, Tunis, Crete after this battle.
5 years before this battle they won the battle of Djerba where half of the spanish ships were sunk.
Nickname997 1 year ago
@Nickname997 why don't u mention Christian European Victories after Malta over ur ottoman pussies at the battle of Slankamen 1691, 2nd battle of Mochas 1687,Battle of Zenta 1697, battle of Petrovardin 1716, 2nd Siege of Vienna 1683 (the 1st Vienna also also 1529), Siege of Eger 1552, the battle of Lepanto 1571, the battle of st.Gotthard 1664, the battle of Sisak 1593 & so on? U know shit just dipshit tales told to u from some old fool instead of distinguished historians, writers & biographers.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Nickname997
True. But soon after you were defeated at Lepanto that constituted a turning point of the Ottoman Empire history, victory led by Spain.
nachopulp 1 year ago
Your a bunch of barbarians that like to steal land and kill people who are not muslim.You have hate and greed in your hearts and ideas of a glorious new Ottoman empire.Once your true intentions are reaveled even the true liberal left will begin to see you are a threat to freedoms that people of the west enjoy.
kyriacos40 11 months ago
And I see that Maltese people think they were mighty and defeated Ottoman Empire.
The victory has nothing to do with Maltese people, The Knights won with help of Spain and Europe. Malta is in his own nothing.
Nickname997 1 year ago
@Nickname997 u don't even know how much knights hospitallers, mercenaries, peasants & u wanna fucking speak from ur arse. For ur information the biggest number of fighters in the great siege were Maltese ppl u idiot 7000-8000, knights hospitallers just 500 at the begining of the siege, 2000 mercenaries from italy & greece & were reinforced by another 4000 later. The spanish u speak of were only less than a 1000 & most of them came during the gran soccorso AT THE END OF THE SIEGE, .
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Suppressingfire the victory always belonged to the knights of st .john & Maltese ppl & not to the few 100s spanish as u say (with all respect to spain) there where so few men near the turks that even able galley slaves were ordered to fight.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Suppressingfire
I'm sorry but I have to desagree. If it hadn't been for the Spanish aid to the island, Malta would have fallen. Alvaro de Bazan played a key role.
nachopulp 1 year ago
@nachopulp Spanish? only 200 Spanish were in the siege if u are talking about the reliefe force that fought the last naxxar battle it didn't fight the battle by their own, cos the knights cavalry of Mdina outflanke the turks, 2ndly during that time the turks were already broken had embarked & only disembarked again when the reliefe force wasn't as big as they thought & 3rd Malta with its few 8000 dfenders withstood the whole siege. Praise goes to the Knights & the Maltese ppl not to the Spanish.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Suppressingfire Yeah, it was all politics. You'd think that the entire Catholic side of Christendom would have sent serious numbers of men to defend somewhere as strategic as Malta.
But oh no, they saw The Knights as a kind of " foreign legion " not to be trusted. France had a non aggression agreement with Constantinople, if I'm right.
Noodles37UK 1 year ago
@Noodles37UK It wasn't that France thought the Knights are not to be trusted, cos 1st of all half the order were French but the reason France didn't even give a hand was cos France was an ally of the Ottomans during that time, during those times France was an ally of Europe's arch enemy. No one, except Spain & the Pope, wanted to help Malta, they simply thought its useless to send prescious men to a rock that the ottomans of suleiman are gonna crush it under their heels, how wrong were they..
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Suppressingfire There was a variety of reasons and you are right.
Noodles37UK 1 year ago
@nachopulp Alvaro de Bazan didn't play a key role but he only joined the gran soccorso reliefe force ships that brought 4000 fresh troops which most were spanish commanded by Ascano de la Corna but when these came the turks were already broken & strated embarking, they fought again in the last battle cos it was smaller than thought & still the Cavalry Knights of Mdina flanked them & some began to run even before flanked. Thats very different from ''if it wasn't for alvaro malta would fall".
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Suppressingfire
Do you really think that receving 4000 fresh troops and provisions after months of siege was not crucial? Alvaro de Bazan did it. It's a fact that the Spanish relief opened a second front against the Turks. The 6th of Sept of 1565, when the Turks began to reembark into the galleys to face the coming armada, was the moment that the besieged used to charge against the Turks. The Turk galleys that were able to face the coming armada suffred heavy losses at sea.
nachopulp 1 year ago
@nachopulp I did not say it wasn't crucial but u need to see the fact that those reinforcements were promised at the beginning of the siege came when the turks were broken & Alvaro is not the hero of the siege, La Valette is, & u'r wrong cos the final battle of the reliefe force wasn't at sea but on land near naxxar hills & they still didn't fight the turks alone cos the cavalry knights of mdina charged & outflanked them. Ascano de la corna was commanding the reliefe force on land.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@nachopulp don't get me wrong cos i love Spain & Spanish history & heroes but credit doesn't go to the Spanish but to the knights of st.john & the Maltese ppl. The turks were already broken & started retreating to their ships when the gran soccorso arrived & they still weren't all spanish but most of them. The only reason the turks disembarked again & fought a last ditch battle was cos they still outnumbered the Christians but their best officers & half the invading was already dead in the siege
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@nachopulp yes there were thousands of spanish troops in the islands as part of the garrison. the credit for the heroic defence and patriotic war goes to hospitallers, maltese, spanish, italian, and greek forces. however, the vast majority of the defenders were maltese troops. as to the final help in september, the ottoman army was already beaten they had no hope of penetrating the defences. they had made many assaults and got nothing expet dead men. they lost 8000 on st elmo only!!
ivaflimkien 1 year ago
@ivaflimkien My Mum is from Valetta. There was a uselessly bloody battle in Saint Paul's Bay right at the very end . I have Correggio's account ( although haven't read it). I've read Bradford's brilliant book though. Malta was saved by a bluff that 16,000 Europeans were coming to her aid. Malta succeeded where the Byzantines failed. The Moslems were truly worn out.
Noodles37UK 1 year ago
@Noodles37UK yeah i read that book of bradfords-i agree with you comppletely. my mums from valletta too
ivaflimkien 1 year ago
Malta was a christian victory and Turks lost many soldiers,
but the forts and guns had the most important role.
Francesco exaggerates Ottomans soldiers and could never know this information he never went to the Ottoman camp.
But all battles where Turks lose christians exaggerate, but they never talk about the victories.
Battle of Djerba 1560
Battle of Preveza (1538)
Nickname997 1 year ago
@Nickname997 Do u know how much stupid u sound, in the camp? the knights observed all around from the forts. turks were all over Marsa, mount schibberras (valletta), tigne, manoel island, msida,outside bigru, bighi, outside senglea & santa margeritha when the few defenders held the the then small city of mdina, the penninsula forts of st.michael senglea, fort st. angelo birgu, & fort fort st.elmo valletta but st.elmo fell after 30 days. the turks lost 25-28000 including 4000 janissaries.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Nickname997 The turks u shout of couldn't take Malta when it was just trees & fields with just 4 little forts let alone what could they do after the siege when la vallette fortified 50 times stronger. During the siege they even killed the famous Turkish General/admiral of the corsairs Dragut, they killed the general Aga of the janissaries, the turkish ordinance commander & many other lower ranking but distinguished officers. Malta wityhstood & 2nd & more destructive siege in ww2 from luftwaffe
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Nickname997 The very words of Lala Kara Mustafa Pasha, overall commander of the turks in malta "Oh Allah, if the son had cost us much, what price shall we have to pay for the father?" speaking of Birgu & Senglea after st.elmo fell. 200 garrison at st.elmo held for 30 day before it fell & fought to the death & took with them 6000 of their best. What the hell do u know about Malta History? Malta with the helb of the British even besieged & kicked out 3,500 garrison French of Napoleon & ww2 also
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
Wonderful pictures, great music, fantastic theme. Viva San Marco, Viva San Giovanni, Viva Malta.
CesareFoscari 1 year ago
Malta had one of the best defences in the world and got help from many European countries.
Ottomans vs Malta was 50%-50%
Ottomans were not much more powerfull and Malta was not a weak undefended place.
Nickname997 1 year ago
@Nickname997 What the !!!!!! I've read different history books to you, what is the source of your data here?
Weary3367 1 year ago
@Weary3367 What kind of books did you read then that you do not know this?
In every book it is written like this.
Nickname997 1 year ago
@Nickname997 A quick check on the net has the numbers at 48000 to 6000 against the Hospitallers, even with the reinforecements they only amounted to approx 14,000. I would be happy to stand corrected upon you supplying your reference source.
Weary3367 1 year ago
@Weary3367 But Malta was a great fortress with firepower and cannons and was supported by superpower Spain. Other sources say Turkish army was 22.000
malta was protected by the Knights who were professional soldiers and they knew that the Turks would attack they had prepared themselves.
You dont have exaggerate everything.
Nickname997 1 year ago
@Nickname997 thats bullshit , malta had only 4 little forts if u check well the defenses in 1565. La vallette made the well fortified cities after the siege when suleiman threatened to besiege it himself. & check out history accounts of turkish numbers from ppl who were there fighting not some modern historian's ideas, Francesco Balbi di Coreccgio gave the most detailed accounts about the siege 38,000 turks came first & reinforced by another 10000 from algiers, tripoli & other muslim corsairs.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Nickname997 & u mentioned firepower lol, i laugh at you the Ottomans had the greatest guns, bombards, mortars & basilisks at the time more than anyone else, don't confuse Malta's defences from before the siege to after it, during the siege all malta had was crappy small cannons they brought with them from Rhodes 30 years earlier. The Turkish guns reduced evrywhere to dust. sry mate but u know NOTHING about the great siege of 1565, u just can't stomach that some knights & farmers defeated turks.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Suppressingfire Allright if you want to believe in your fantasy propoganda story that Malta was powerfull, believe in your fantasy story.
Yes you have right !
Malta knights and farmers were very strong!
but that the knights never could conquer any teritorry from Turks
has ofcourse nothing to do that their ONLY victory in Malta has to do with that Malta was a fortress!
Francesco says in his book that they used firepower with great effect.
The knights were rich had weapons,ships.
Nickname997 1 year ago
@Nickname997 the knights were just a fraction near the ottomans they were just a few 1000s near the whole ottoman empire, EXEGERATE? u should say muslim never admit defeat. but u should also know the the few knights & maltese farmers sunk & captured many ottoman galleys & ships in naval battles, for ur info the few knight HALTED THE OTTOMAN ADVANCE FROM THE MEDITERRANEAN. where the hell do u get ur so-called history? DON'T BELIEVBE ME U SHOULDN'T, BUT AT LEAST GO READ ABOUT THEM BEFORE U SPEAK.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Nickname997 thats funny u wanna compare the few 100s knights hospitallers & their limited resourses with ottomans on riches, men power, Bombards, basilisks,mortars,cannons, ships & so on? the most important thing that i am Maltaese i'm proud to tell u that we small ppl, & a few knights slaughtered ottomans dipshits like rabbits, outnumbered 5-1 & their remains returned home at night by order of suleiman so that they would the ppl won't watch defeated champions of islam by a few peasants.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Nickname997 Turks for ur info have a whole history outnumbering the enemy in many many of their battles, where's the glory in that 200,000 against 7000 in constantinople, 100,000 agaisnt a few 1000 peasants at the siege of eger, both vienna sieges, Lepanto & so on. Turks my arse all they were is barbarians raping , looting & killing peasants. lol i'm sure u don't even know that the best turkish troops 'the janissaries' were mostly sons of christians & a slave army.
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@Nickname997 ottomans vs. malta was 90%-10%. it was the disagreements between the three ottoman naval commanders and the sultan gave way to tactical mistakes.
aporia82 1 year ago
i think kingdom of heaven is an excellent movie its one of my favorites but the historical inaccuracy in it really bugs me and it did seem more one sided towards the muslims
Atvor 1 year ago
hi ... Great video ... Can you tell me what soundtrack did you use for this video? Thanks
stillakercem 1 year ago
@stillakercem its called Preliator by Globus , tnkx :)
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
GERİ GELECEĞİZ...
thecoverplay 2 years ago
write in English f'oxx il-hniezer razztek
Suppressingfire 2 years ago
hahah ich einen turkish kebab yeah AVE Europe The kings of War oqodu emm haha nice video man
futuramark 2 years ago
Comment removed
futuramark 2 years ago
the hills of naxxar !!!!!!
grandememe 2 years ago
it is a great video.
munxar5 2 years ago
Yeah show em turkeys what happens when ya fak with us maltese and european knights.. ;p
futuramark 2 years ago
Greets from Ireland long life and Blessings to Malta and its people
IslamicTerd 2 years ago 2
the bastard that made kingdom of heaven promised that he would make the great siege of malta and lied and made kingdom of heaven. anyways great vid! ive been to that museum its incredible
PrinceOfMalta1 2 years ago
Tnkx bro :) did he? Ridley Scott eh? If he made the Kingdom of Heaven more favorable on the Christian side instead of showing christians battling eachother, christian jealousy, christian killing civilians, christian defeats & historical inaccuracy, i think he would have done a great job. I know that most of it happened, but why show only the bad things? Thats why i hate kingdom of heaven, cos it starts & ends with shameful acts of christians & victorious muslims.
Suppressingfire 2 years ago
However, i must say that the siege was awesome, i think i never seen a siege on a film as good as the one in kingdom of heaven.
Suppressingfire 2 years ago
@Suppressingfire Kingdom of heaven is historically inaccurate. Its a politically correct movie to make everyone feel happy and fuzzy inside.
JulianThePhilosopher 1 year ago
@JulianThePhilosopher i don't mean i hate the film cos its medieval scense r great but other scense annoy me like when balian was all alone in the desert & 4-5 Teutonic Knights in armour & swords, shields, flails, lance came & he kills them all lol, especially the last knight punched balian with his mail glove, then a header with his helm which they will surly put him out of his sences but balian steals his dagger & stuck it in his visor then balian dies & the hospitaller brings him back to life
Suppressingfire 1 year ago
@JulianThePhilosopher yeah thats true, especially in the last scene, where saladin apparently just lets all the defenders and citizens of jeruesalem go home no catches. However the truth was he set a price in silver for their freedom, and those who could not pay up were enslaved, and a scribe who's name escapes me, wrote about the mass rape of women afterwards, I know it wasn't as bad as slaughtering entire populace like christians did, but it was still wrong, and typical of "religion of peace"
fuckinghell93 1 year ago
I really really wish they make the Great siege of Malta 1565 a film, but if they ever make one i hope they will not ruin it with a bunch historical errors like they usually do. They made many films of smaller battles & sieges, why won't they do the Malta Great siege? against all odds, hopelessly outnumbered & facing the Conquering Ottoman Empire army of Suleiman the Magnificent.
Suppressingfire 2 years ago
nice one
RomaVictor36 2 years ago
ABSOLUTE CHRISTIAN VICTORY!
Great work! 5/5 ; )
albertohWP 2 years ago
This was one hell of a brutal and bloody siege!! It would make a great movie actually to pay tribute to the bravery and courage of those involved in the defence.
Grand Master Valette of the Knights of St John said to the Ottomans, "We Christians will fight to the death and take you with us."
GodfreyBouillon2 2 years ago
At 1st Mustafa got so pissed that swore to kill evry single one including the Maltese fighters once they won, weeks later, knowing its not that easy he changed his mind & demanded 'Honourable Surrender'. When Mustafa's slave told this to La valette, he replied "Tell ur master There is the only territory i will give him. There lies the land he may have for his own" & showed the slave a huge ditch full of twisted,rotting & roasted janissary bodies.
Suppressingfire 2 years ago
LOL! La valette is a legend!! These are the kind of warriors we need today.
GodfreyBouillon2 2 years ago
good video
Luiszxc9999 2 years ago
arrgh!! i always have to forget something >:( i forgot the TNKX FOR WATCHING at the end.... sry
Suppressingfire 2 years ago
Nice work well done ,lovely music too ;)
SirRupertGiles 2 years ago