The music you chose for this video is absolutely awesome and appropriate. If I were to rate the video responses I've heard to KH's video, I'd have to rate this one the best at keeping my attention.
When having to take a horse to the prom, it becomes a matter of function over form. The little horse will not be able to handle your weight as well, as you gallop through the doors to the prom, dressed as Vigilante (Greg Saunders).
Great response, I love your reasoning...hope you still have your tongue...
I will be very interested to see what you think of my choices when I announce them and why I went the way I did. Some of it is similar to your approach, but other parts are very different.
5 and 6 topped my list, both seem like neat little summaries of the fundamentalist and liberal theologian's positions, their conceptions of an athiest, and their flaws. 5 presents what would be valid arguments if the premise were not demonstrably false (kicks itself by attacking scientific method though). It's appeal to emotion was #3 and #4summarised.
Asside from Godwin, 6 seemed to confuse god with a subjective feeling
The most interesting thing is how they write their straw-athiests.
I couldn't hone in on 1 problem with #1 I was burried in an onslaught of BS. The argument from beauty section (seemingly not aware of any suffering existing in the world) got most of my attention.
#2 was VFX material (theres a begining) + semantics with defining athiesm
#3 didn't offend me - seems like projecting the fact that christians only get 'born again' when emotionally unstable / cld work on desperate ppl
# 4 - saying pascal was present is giving this non-argument more than it's due
YAAAY! *throws confetti*
ChelseaHysteria 2 years ago
This is rawsome.
BRV6969 2 years ago
I had to watch this again for the second time, just to hear the music. Consider that a subscription gained.
NosLycn 2 years ago
The music you chose for this video is absolutely awesome and appropriate. If I were to rate the video responses I've heard to KH's video, I'd have to rate this one the best at keeping my attention.
When having to take a horse to the prom, it becomes a matter of function over form. The little horse will not be able to handle your weight as well, as you gallop through the doors to the prom, dressed as Vigilante (Greg Saunders).
NosLycn 2 years ago
Great response, I love your reasoning...hope you still have your tongue...
I will be very interested to see what you think of my choices when I announce them and why I went the way I did. Some of it is similar to your approach, but other parts are very different.
Thanks for the response!
KingHeathen 2 years ago
You're welcome, and thanks. I'm looking forward to yours and I'll be sure to leave a comment.
kreskinkun 2 years ago
5 and 6 topped my list, both seem like neat little summaries of the fundamentalist and liberal theologian's positions, their conceptions of an athiest, and their flaws. 5 presents what would be valid arguments if the premise were not demonstrably false (kicks itself by attacking scientific method though). It's appeal to emotion was #3 and #4summarised.
Asside from Godwin, 6 seemed to confuse god with a subjective feeling
The most interesting thing is how they write their straw-athiests.
unassumption 2 years ago
I couldn't hone in on 1 problem with #1 I was burried in an onslaught of BS. The argument from beauty section (seemingly not aware of any suffering existing in the world) got most of my attention.
#2 was VFX material (theres a begining) + semantics with defining athiesm
#3 didn't offend me - seems like projecting the fact that christians only get 'born again' when emotionally unstable / cld work on desperate ppl
# 4 - saying pascal was present is giving this non-argument more than it's due
unassumption 2 years ago
i wanted to punch all of them.....
1550949 2 years ago
Good response, although I disagree with your answer, I wanted to punch no 3.
Cade57 2 years ago
I really don't like 3. It's essentially the difference between a 37% and a 35%. They're all Fs.
kreskinkun 2 years ago