Ironically, there are some researchers speculating that the LACK of pollution is part of the reason for global warming. The line of logic is something to the effect that less pollution allows more sunlight through. That seems like it would be enough, but then it continues by saying that more sunlight makes plants a darker green, which in turn traps in more heat and warms the planet.
Funny this kind of asshole complains about biased polls in the librull media when he never deviates one iota from FOX's cooked up right wing propaganda line some call news. Then he gets all sanctimonious, conflating to the state of WI asking people not to feed peanuts to squirrels in the capitol into some sinister LAW, which it isn't. But I guess when you are a right wing neo-theo-con mouthpiece, you can lie all you want while you pretend you are some righteous defender of freedom
@BarthBunzel If your'e liberal, (which im not) this is just the stuff to divide the right and the GOP. It will help the Dems win the general in '12. And if Palin wins the primary, do a jig, because it will ensure a dem victory.
"Now some people in school are not allowed eat peanut butter sandwiches"
Gee....I wonder why someone with a peanut allergy would not want to eat a peanut sandwich. A "partial immunity" will not make it possible to eat peanut.
Also, you do not gain a partial immunity due to exposer- quite the opposite. You gain an allergy from extended exposer
I think the president that was in charge when we bombed them should apologize, I mean it wasn't Obama's decision at all for the bombing. I'm sure he would've said no
I came to this page from a link that recommended you, but now I even more don't get it. Dude, don't hyperventillate. On second thought, watching someone hyperventillate might actually be more entertaining. It was that bad.
how about you ask the people of CUDA what they think. its interesting that you listen to his detractors but not those who stay there. the ones who like the status quo there. the same with Venezuela. there are people in America that feel like they have been locked up for decent. england, france. all over the world. why do you not pick up on these countries? we have laws that prohibit "hate speech" which really actually get used to stop decent.
Why shouldn't the United States apologise for the atomic bombins in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Sure, the Japanese government was wrong for its expansionist policies, bombing Pearl Harbour, and other war crimes they committed, but why should you punish civilians for a governments actions? Think about it for a while. Is there really nothing to apologise for? What about the countless innocent people who lost their friends and relatives? Shouldn't the U.S. apologise to them?
@TheXtranormalproduct Because Japan attacked the US, and because they just wouldnt surrender. And all other options were worse for everyone, whether invasion or blockade. The reason they dropped on civilians is they knew the Japanese thought the US were "weak" and sentimental (why they thought this, i dont know!) and they dropped the 2nd bomb because they did not recieve a surrender from the first. Its a brutal, horrible and catastrophic event that was unfortunately necessary.
How can this generation apologize for what happened 2 generations ago? We had nothing to do with it. Do you think any such apology from this generation would be sincere or heartfelt? I argue its impossible. What good is a half-assed, disingenuous apology?
"Oh, atom bomb? My bad."
How fucking ridiculous is that? If your relative was killed in Japan would you want a fake ass apology? Fuck no. Do we feel bad? YES! But we cant apologize 4 what we didnt do.
@TheXtranormalproduct the attack wasn't to punish civilians, it was to end a war. tell me would you rather have the US Invade and have every Japanese citizen fight to the death?
Now don't get me wrong when I rated you 1 star. The only reason I do this is because the reason the level of republicans was low for (most likely) 1 of 2 reasons.
1. It was a completely random sample of population and it just turned out that way which is how a perfect poll is supposed to be taken. With completely randomly chosen people.
2. They tried including that many republicans but as it often is. Some people refused to answer and they were simply removed from the poll percentage.
also this is something that simply happens when a new president gets elected. Since the president won then that means the great majority like him. So at the beginning of the presidency people will like him thus giving a high approval rate. As the months pass, that tends to go down.
The reason why Obama had such a high approval rate was because of the mess that Bush made. People simply lost faith in the republicans.
??? I said nothing about his approval rating. I was just correcting his statement about the statistics and the fact that they were most likely done correctly or as best as they can.
That peanut thing was just nuts (no pun intended.) Did it ever occur to you that the reason we didn't hear about peanut allergies 20 years ago was because people died from them before making it to school, rather than building up an immunity?
That would be a good argument, but 20 years ago we already had ways to treat allergic reactions (on most cases) before they reached the critical stage.
Is this what they teach you in american schools? Actually there were a lot of other countries that were instrumental in WWII.
In fact, the USA didn't even bother to get involved until much later, after the japanese pantsed you guys at PH.
I'm not talking about the ethics of war, I'm not even talking about "what would have happened if the yanks didn't use the nuke". I'm saying that "america won WWII" is about as accurate as "america won the vietnam war"
He said america won the war - that's a bit like saying Guardiola won the barcelona soccer - he just happened to be on the winning side - he did NOT win the match himself.
My other points about the failures of america to involve itself in the war are also valid, in fact, america made profits out of the war before joining it - a habit and mistake that continues to haunt it to this day - see the bullshit in afganistan.
Actually it makes perfect sense. Because he was only talking about America. It makes sense to say America won WWII. If he were only talking about England that saying England won would be acceptable too. Because these countries were on the winning side. It's all about linguistic concepts. So even though I know jack crap about soccer, You can say Guardiola won barcelona soccer, IF your only talking about Guardiola.
I could say that - but it would be both lying and disingenuous. The fact is that in a group effort, by definition, no one single entity can claim rights to "winning" anything. They can try (and the usa often does), but the rest of the team would rightly be disgusted.
Americas profits are not a mistake. It's when certain politicians decide to trust these sides before learning about them that mistake comes in. But Afganistan is not like WWII. Because in WWII we profited by selling weapons to the allies. (It's called capitalism btw) Afganistan was an attempt to finally make an ally in the middle east besides Israel. Because we never had a huge standing in the M.E.
I admit that was a mistake in Afganistan but are liberal party never could get it right.
what a joke - you are attempting to divorce responsiblitity of the vendor of their product. In fact, the usa profited by selling weapons to any one who bought them, not just the allies.
As for your liberal party quip - remind me again who equipped saddam hussein with weapons?
You are either the the least informed person on youtube or your trying to trip me up.
Selling weapons to an ally is not the same as selling drugs to a kid. In fact after the war started USA kept business strictly among the allies. It's not divorcing responsibility it's using common sense.
Let's see Hussein came into power in 1979. His weapons were supplied around that time too.... That would make Jimmy Carter the president. So your answer is once again the liberal party.
I never claimed that the rest of the world was smart. Since mainstreamer only look to point fingers to make themselves feel better. I'm not attempting to dodge anything. I'm simply telling you like it is. Allies betray, that is a fact of life. Grow up already.
You call the iraqi war a "betrayal"? Breathtakingly ignorant stuff
If anyone betrayed anyone here, it would be the yanks, who very obligingly gave saddam a whole pile of weapons & then turned on them a decade later
since the rest of the world sees the USA from the outside - unlike most of the usa population - relatively, the rest of the world IS smarter on this matter
You can tell me what you think it is till youre blue in the face mate - your grasp of reality is what Im talking about. etc
I didn't call the Iraq war anything. Your mincing words. I simply stated that Betrayal is a fact of life. You however proved that you are a cowardly debater.
FYI The US did not betray Iraq a decade later, Saddam became immensly corrupt and began taking steps to eliminate all non-muslim states. (not just the US)
You can't claim to be "smarter" on any issue unless you can see both sides. Outside and In. You fail here.
So in conclusion "mate" I actually have a grasp of reality.
You just took everything out of context, How does that put facts on your side?
Think about that, Your not arguing your mincing words and quote mining.
Since you cannot logically form a competent rebuttle that means you fail yet again. So the facts must be on my side because you making your arguments up.
Now if your walnut sized mind can finally grasp this. The US supported Iraq during it's battle for independance. However their Dictator took absolute power and began invading Kuwait. So the US stepped in with UN approval. So who betrayed who here? because Facts will show that a former ally actually betrayed us when they attacked a current ally.
Then they preceeded to vengefully build WMD's so we interrupted that and managed to liberate an oppressed people. Oh yeah so much US betrayal here.
whoops. you made a couple of factual errors there buddy - for a start I'm talking about the current war, not the hogwash that you're babbling about. Here are the facts for your digestion.
1. the 2003 invasion of iraq did not have un approval
2. the intelligence on wmds was not only found to be wrong, it was found to be fabricated.
How dissapointing - yet again, I am debating with a monkey who is not equipped to hold the debate.
Go learn stuff, you intellectually inept, brainwashed monkey.
Hmm, so you're saying that it's okay to keep killing people even when the evidence that you used to justify the killing, was found to be faked?
Pre war evidence was faked, does that mean the war should continue?
Btw, the UN didn't get involved because the ethics of such a war were seriously shaky - didn't stop the yanks butchering the folks there though, even if the rest of the sane world knew it was a joke.
No your saying that. I'm saying the united states had probable cause (detective work) when Saddam refeused to allow UN investigators in the country. Remember he was under survelliance as a risk to all nations. The US had to bait the perverbial hook because of the cowardly trend infecting the modern world, but sometimes extremes are necessary.
Btw the UN was involved until 2005 when the other involvd nations pulled out for their own various purposes.
For the love of god, are you seriously that damn inept?
Noooo, I'm not saying that it's okay to invade a country even when the justification is fake.. yawn... that is EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE of what I am saying you buffoon!
Look, I'm completely through trying to speak sense to an ape that stumbles around, groping for content and fact. You can dress it all up the way you like, it's all lipstick on a pig mate
You kill people for a faked reason like the usa does, then suffer the scorn of the planet.
Hurts when your own logic is used against you doesn't it? All you have is pathetic name calling. You don't even realize that I've made a monkey out of you.
lol your entertaining. Mind your blood pressure now.
But hey, at least I didn't run away from a problem that doesn't exist.
Next time try counterfacts instead of just repeating yourself. It makes your arguments hard to take seriously.
But hey I'd be happy to continue a real debate if you can actually do your own research. Because so far the only "Brainwashed monkey" here is the one pointing his finger. You have much to learn before you can hope to continue.
But you ever notice how close Iraq is to Syria and Iran? Two confirmed enemies of the US? Wouldn't they be willing to hide secrets from their "sworn" enemies?
This is what we call investigation. Try it sometime.
I'm not a fan of Bush, but the evidence is leaning toward him right now.
So are you calling yourself a monkey? Come on you shouldn't be so hard on yourself.
Lol!, you ARE trying to have a pissing contest!, how come you didn't grow out of that when you are 16, like everyone else?
So let me just check with you, since you claim to be reading from "non-partial" sources (btw, correct english is "impartial" meaning, not partial or biased, but don't let your poor spelling and lousy grammar cloud your hilarious delusions) - which sources ARE you using? just so I can check exactly how "non partial" they are.
No I'm just pointing out evidence that you back away from and resort back to your superiority complex and blatant hypocracy. Why didn't you grow out of that when you were 12, like everyone else?
Most of my information actually comes from BBC not ABC but BBC. (btw the time for correct english is uneccessary when dealing with an entertainment unit like youtube, But don't let your narcissism cloud your grotesquely saddening delusions.)
Lol. Okay,wait, let me confirm with you that you think a backyard lab in iraq is your proof that they're creating WMDs? Don't you think that, just a little, you're completely misunderstanding the scale of the effort invovled?
lol, strange, even hans blix disagrees with you. Don't you think hans blix would have more of a clue than you?
btw since you are so obsessed with pissing contest. Wouldn't your bad grammar and inability to recognize ebonic idioms make you just as much of an idiot as me? I mean come on you try to play grammar teacher on me and end up missing basic punctuation. lol
I use American ebonics from time to time. Big deal, I'm around it all day.
So when I look back in retrospect, your the one who wanted this pissing contest at the beginning, but laugh at me when I reverse your momentum. textbook hypocracy.
Like a kid, you're now trying to convince me that "non partial" is a word in current usage by african americans?
it must be truly mind-numbing to be you.
tedious. tedious and boring. we both know it's a stupid fucking expression that doesn't exist. Get over it and get on with it, you meaningless halfwit.
I'm only throwing your own tedious ways back at you.
Thanks for the rascism btw. Do you believe that only african-americans use ebonic idioms? That's childish wouldn't you say? (Hypocracy?)
It's actually quite fun to be me, I was trained to see through BS and you are the eaisest case I've ever witnessed. Even if you don't leave Iceland often. Try actually visiting America before you try to tell an American what we do and don't do.
Get over it and on with it, narcissim has no purpose.
"Ebonics is a term that was originally intended and sometimes used for the language of all people of African ancestry"
I'm being no more racist than if I said african americans had black skin.
What else you got mate? going to call me racist for calling saying that the mohawks are native americans? lol, "trained". really. So which part of your ability to see through bullshit makes you still believe I live in iceland? dumbass.
Hmmm.. Did I notice the word "originally" in that description? That means it's not exclusive to the African-American community. Wow! you know your ineptitude for logic is an embarassment.
Your page says iceland, so since I'm turning your own patterns against. that's all I need for a personal attack.
Ok, keep repeating yourself It only makes you look inept as you face fact after fact that debunks you. You actually think that ONLY African-Americans use ebonics? Regardless of who invented the concept the behavior is prime for imitation. Even from yours truly because all my friends use ebonics.
Try again kiddo.
Since you obviously are incapable of doing anything new. I will simply restate that I'm using your logic against which allows me to justify my own BS.
lol. You forfeit your own reasoning on your whole argument about grammar. Pointing out the obvious now has only reinforced my point. (btw you cave too eaisly under pressure.)
Well feel free to keep posting the comments your not suppose to be posting. I'll answer and continue pulling your strings for as long as you allow it.
You can keep imagining that you're steering the conversation, but I'm sorry. You are not
Now. do I admit your statement about ebonics is correct? Sure it is, but so Is mine. Both are correct, one does not preclude the other. African americans are the origin of ebonics, and this has been my point all along.
As for the rest of your post - I have no idea what you're trying to say - it's incoherent, poorly written, and presents no argument. It's just ranting
This whole comment proves I'm steering the "conversation." So little boy it seems you want to dance some more.
The fact that my statement is correct (and that you don't live around here) shows that YOU are only assuming.
The reason you don't understand the rest of the comment is because your unable to break it. Nothing to do with my writing your just not thinking deeply enough. Look beyond yourself, because your starting to dissapoint me.
Actually, the reason that I'm having problems decoding your posts is that they are discontinuous, disjointed, poorly written, poorly thought out, they present no argument, they present no legitimate information or evidence.... etc etc. etc.
lol.. yeah ok, you're right, this is getting boring, and I think I'll let you post a few more uninformed rants till you realise you humor me no longer. lol.
Unablke to break through logic again I see. Or are you just selectively literate?
My comments have followed the same format as your own. So think of what your saying about yourself.
I have stated multiple times that I would copy you.
So While you enjoy your meaningless humor at your own expense. I'll allow you to remain as uninformed because I grow weary of your inability to think critically.
So do you have anything? Mate? Cause you keep repeating the same pathetic childish insults with absolutely no sense of creativity. yawn. Do you even have the ability to make sense, or completly research a source? Maybe you should check those mobile labs again, hardly someones back yard.
lol when your ready to grow up drop another line.
btw This makes 3 times you've promised to stop messaging me and yet you still do it! That's hilarious.
lol, for some reason I enjoy baiting ignorant americans - fills in the blanks at work.
A logical paradox is one that disproves or contradicts itself. e.g. "this statement is false" is a paradox. You've simply asked a pile of inane questions, none of which are a paradox. Perhaps this is yet another word you need to look up?
Acutally, I did live in the usa, I left because the entire philosphy of the government was so obviously wrong and lacked ethics; a la invading a country on a faked premise.
What I actually said was "I'm not going to reply unless you have proof" (of WMDs)"
Unfortunatly all you camp up with was a very sad attempt, which I later showed to be false, but I thought merited my response since it was symptomatic of your misunderstanding of the world, & in fact, it directly contradicted opinions of UN experts
A WMD chemical lab in somones house? puhlease
I think you should write "dance puppet dance" a few more times, it gets funnier each time you do
You said that the first time, So what about the other three? I gave you evidence and you didn't bother researching the right subject to shoot down. So you got no merit for your response because you couldn't even research the right topic.
You brought up the WMD in someones house I simply used logic to demonstrate your naive ways.
Good laughing at yourself is a sign of maturity. Keep it up. You need some serious healing.
If by "good" you mean bringing up meaningless examples of falsafiable hogwash, then I'll agree. you excel.
Actually, YOU said that the BBC report on the chemical labs was evidence of WMDs in iraq, this is rot.
BBC reported a backyard chem lab, hans blix also stated that they could not make WMDs, you simply lied and assumed that this two-bit operation proved that iraq makes WMDs - there's very little "logic" involved in your misreporting of the facts
I said I get most of my information from BBC. When you add up all the evidence it makes a strong case worth investigating. Which the UN did not do. You can't think beyond the media at all.
I never lied or assumed. I only gave one example which you are desperately trying to break through. and all you have is 1 article that say 1 SUSPECTED lab was a home. You also didn't think about my argument before trying to counter it. I did hint to dective work. cont...
I was going to save this for when you played the crap out of your Falsafiable mobile labs claim. But I'm bored and theirs nothing good on TV so why not.
Did you ever wonder why only a select number of sources on Mobile Labs and WMD's were released, while the vast majority are classified?
Show me a government that tells it's people the entire story, and I'll show you a nation of corpses.
lol, interesting. you think he's guilty just because you say he is. It's interesting because the usa normally has a policy of "innocent until proven guilty" - you, on the other hand, are subscribing to "guilty until proven innocent".
The question you should be asking is: "if none can be found, does that prove he DOES have some?"
If I simply accuse you of having weapons, is that ground enough for me to try to kill you? not in the slightest!
"you're going to continue to accuse him and believe he's guilty because that's what you've been told to think, and you have no ability to do anything other than what everyone else has told you to do".
You do realise that one of the things that the usa is most famous for is not only it's hypocrisy, but it's competete inability to acknowledge it's own hypocrisy - as you are ably demonstrating.
Good luck with your double-standards mate - everyone else just laughs.
not at all, usa has the highest murder/shooting the fastests growing unemployment and the highest national debt per person in the developed world.
but I like the fact you have no idea. most americans don't.
Seeya kiddo, if you're still deperate to have this inane conversation in a few decades, perhaps we can pick it up then. Until then, I can see you've run out of any valid points to make.
What, exactly is your point again? That backyard chemistry sets comprise a weapon of mass destruction that validates an invasion (and an expendidure) on the scale that the americans are currently involved in?
Really? are you typing with a straight face, pictures of reagan and dubya on the wall, and with the "stars and stripes" playing in the background? I hope so, that would be completely consistent with my mental image of you.
bloodrunsclear 22 years old , wonder how you'll like BHO when the draft starts ?
Need to study LBJ and the vietnam war , you'll find a amazing story , I predict when BHO plan for the economy fails , He will have to send the peasants of to war ,Like all good dictators do ,One thing to remember about BUSH, he was privy to info, so is BHO, that's why BHO just kept BUSH'S war plans,VOTE for BHO 4 more years of BUSH
The Republican are a bunch of lying, conniving, rapacious swine, hell-bent on impoverishing the American middle class.
Obama would not have to apologize to the rest of the world if Bush hadn't commited so many crimes against humanity. Kids with peanut allergies will die if they eat peanuts. I'd go into more but I just don't have the time.
Greetings. I'm a lying, conniving, rapacious swine and so is my family. I'd just like to thank you for helping to bring America together in a bipartisan unification, just as Obama promised. I'm glad his is a party of hope, not of hate.
We need a third party in America I'm tired of this Democrate vs. Republican BS! Everyone likes to throw the blame on the other party, all that does is cause hate and its just dumb.
I do agree. I also wish in the meantime both parties could treat the other with respect, not edging out or ragging on one of the other to discredit them.
So, 38% of them are independent, I assume. You don't mention the numbers of his approval rating in the pole either. So, you're just spouting cool sounding numbers and not backing them up. You again show yourself to be an intellectual coward. Doing nothing more than staring straight ahead and trying to appear smart!
Thank you for what you do! I joined You Tube today after dragging my feet for a long time because in order to subscribe to your channel I had to join. Now I am catching up on your videos... all in one night. (I discovered HTWW two days ago but had not gone back to see the previous videos.) You do a good job with the news, short, sweet and to the point!
Sure. You comment on a poll in favor of a Democrat, but nothing on the so called "Polls" ran by UCLA which supposedly said Fox News was fair and balanced.
Why didn't he just register with the username "Fox News the 2nd?" It would be more accurate.
You're a moron. Peanut butter allergies (or any allergies) are an immune system over reaction. The body essentially creates too many anti-bodies for a harmless chemical or molecule, and this causes over inflammation. Being exposed to peanuts does not create "an immunity", they already have an immunity, and that's the problem. Furthermore, the government did not write a law, ordering people to stop, they asked them to, You can still feed peanuts if you want to, just to be defiant.
jesus you're a dip shit. KIDS WITH PEANUT ALLERGIES CAN'T EAT PEANUT BUTTER CUZ THEY'LL DIE YOU FUCK!!!! people did not build a small resistance to peanuts 20 years ago, they avoided them just like they do today
Approximately 300,000 Iraqi girls are rapped by American solder , If some did the same to American girls what American will do imagine.That why lots of sucides boom in Iraq. Most of them women and girls. But US media did not show facts in the TV.
where the FUCK did you come up with that statistic (300K iraqis raped by US soldiers). why don't you just say 30 gajillion? i'm not saying the number is zero, but with an outrageous figure like that, you've got to substantiate it.
My friend was eating a snickers (I think), so some peanut got on her hand, so when she passed some different chocolate to one of my other friends, he had a reaction. And as for the media mishaps, did you see Fox's revolution talks on TEA day. The not blinking is scary still.
Generalized approval polls like that should use a random subset of the population regardless of the sample distribution between parties. I agree that the poll may be skewed to the left, since as you say there are several percent divergence compared to other pools regarding party preferences. There may be many reasons for this, such as a poor geographically diversification of the sample data, but regardless THIS pool showed these results.
I have a hard time believing that the shortcomings of the pool was intentional. So saying it is fake is taking it too far. Should the media outlets in question maybe have discarded the pool? Maybe, however the media has never been that good at anything concerning numbers.
Its the peanuts being in a public area where a child or other is exposed to the peanuts. But who cares if a child gets "sick" from the allergy, sick of course meaning their throat swells until they cannot breathe.
I don't believe that America needs to apologize for dropping the A-bomb, but it really seems that you can't tell the difference of bombing a naval base and killing soldiers and bombing two cities, killing over 200,000 civilians.
I'm glad you really took the time to explain how the poll was conducted and how most polls use a small sample size. Its great that you explained that the answers were weighted for age, sex, race, region... Thanks for looking into the possibility of some people who vote for republicans responding as independents. You really clarified how this poll was conducted.
Me, I closed up shop ! Can't afford to be in business any longer and am losing my retirement. Can't wait to get into the bread and soup line and get a hand out from your tax dollars. Ahhh, food stamps and free medical. I can't wait.
I worked hard for my retirement and now I will have to work until I die. The USA will never be able to repay the trillions of dollars that Obama has borrowed. We will be lucky if our great,great, great grandchildren will have the luxury of the freedom we used to enjoy. We are being taxed to death. That surely will give people incentive to open new business and create new jobs. Been there, done that. Can you spell "Socialism?"
I love you, man. You tell it like it is. Piss on the democratics. I have not met one person who voted for Obama that will still not go against him. All I've heard is, "Give him one year.He just got into office. It was the republicans who put the USA in this mess." People, wake up. We are all going broke because Obama is giving our money away. Do you all want to be living in the same cardboard box? That's where we are headed.
bargainhunter, when's the last time anybody got a job from a democrat? as charles barclay said, poor ppl have been voting for democrats for 50 years, and guess what? they're still poor.'
You totally missed my point entirely. I didn't vote for Obama and .................I am a Republican and not ashamed to admit it. I suggest you go back and read my comments. I tried to find them but they have seemed to mysteriously disappear....Hmmm, must have been a democrat in the house.
bargainhunter, i read several of your posts and i agreed with them 100%. i should have been more clear. my intention was to add to your argument. sorry that i came across like i was disagreeing with you. it should be obvious to anyone reading your posts that you are 'right of central'.
OH and I just watched a show about a girl who's peanut allergy is so bad, she shook hands with someone who had eaten peanuts earlier in the day and had to be rushed to the hospital. Yea, let's expose her to peanuts "over time" and watch her die. YOU'RE A MORON
Methinks you underestimate the severity of some peanut allergies.
ThePuppyTurtle 8 months ago
Ironically, there are some researchers speculating that the LACK of pollution is part of the reason for global warming. The line of logic is something to the effect that less pollution allows more sunlight through. That seems like it would be enough, but then it continues by saying that more sunlight makes plants a darker green, which in turn traps in more heat and warms the planet.
Source: Super Freakanomics, by Levitt & Dubner
Altimadark 1 year ago 2
Funny this kind of asshole complains about biased polls in the librull media when he never deviates one iota from FOX's cooked up right wing propaganda line some call news. Then he gets all sanctimonious, conflating to the state of WI asking people not to feed peanuts to squirrels in the capitol into some sinister LAW, which it isn't. But I guess when you are a right wing neo-theo-con mouthpiece, you can lie all you want while you pretend you are some righteous defender of freedom
BarthBunzel 1 year ago
@BarthBunzel If your'e liberal, (which im not) this is just the stuff to divide the right and the GOP. It will help the Dems win the general in '12. And if Palin wins the primary, do a jig, because it will ensure a dem victory.
aaronsdavis 1 year ago
it's a conspiracy!!! shut up...
matlabboy 1 year ago
"Now some people in school are not allowed eat peanut butter sandwiches"
Gee....I wonder why someone with a peanut allergy would not want to eat a peanut sandwich. A "partial immunity" will not make it possible to eat peanut.
Also, you do not gain a partial immunity due to exposer- quite the opposite. You gain an allergy from extended exposer
jimjamgumbob 1 year ago
I think the president that was in charge when we bombed them should apologize, I mean it wasn't Obama's decision at all for the bombing. I'm sure he would've said no
Tahitianish 1 year ago
I came to this page from a link that recommended you, but now I even more don't get it. Dude, don't hyperventillate. On second thought, watching someone hyperventillate might actually be more entertaining. It was that bad.
ibrox72 1 year ago
Sooo, now the conservatives need a john stewart LOL.
larsjake 1 year ago
They posted another bogus poll today.
Claiming that 83% agree with Obama after the state of the union speech.
I took that poll and noticed that not 1 question on that poll agreed with obama.
so in reality 100% DISagreed with him.
mlkkkkkkk 2 years ago
how about you ask the people of CUDA what they think. its interesting that you listen to his detractors but not those who stay there. the ones who like the status quo there. the same with Venezuela. there are people in America that feel like they have been locked up for decent. england, france. all over the world. why do you not pick up on these countries? we have laws that prohibit "hate speech" which really actually get used to stop decent.
rsolgtp 2 years ago
We've always had peanut allergies and they can and do even kill people. and they do not develop partial immunity.
TruthInjector 2 years ago
Why shouldn't the United States apologise for the atomic bombins in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Sure, the Japanese government was wrong for its expansionist policies, bombing Pearl Harbour, and other war crimes they committed, but why should you punish civilians for a governments actions? Think about it for a while. Is there really nothing to apologise for? What about the countless innocent people who lost their friends and relatives? Shouldn't the U.S. apologise to them?
TheXtranormalproduct 2 years ago 8
The U.S. or the U.S government?
miller44jpgg44 2 years ago
@TheXtranormalproduct Because Japan attacked the US, and because they just wouldnt surrender. And all other options were worse for everyone, whether invasion or blockade. The reason they dropped on civilians is they knew the Japanese thought the US were "weak" and sentimental (why they thought this, i dont know!) and they dropped the 2nd bomb because they did not recieve a surrender from the first. Its a brutal, horrible and catastrophic event that was unfortunately necessary.
aaronsdavis 1 year ago
@TheXtranormalproduc Think of it this way:
How can this generation apologize for what happened 2 generations ago? We had nothing to do with it. Do you think any such apology from this generation would be sincere or heartfelt? I argue its impossible. What good is a half-assed, disingenuous apology?
"Oh, atom bomb? My bad."
How fucking ridiculous is that? If your relative was killed in Japan would you want a fake ass apology? Fuck no. Do we feel bad? YES! But we cant apologize 4 what we didnt do.
2eelShmeal 6 months ago in playlist How the world works
@TheXtranormalproduct the attack wasn't to punish civilians, it was to end a war. tell me would you rather have the US Invade and have every Japanese citizen fight to the death?
maximunoutlaw32 5 months ago
Yes obammy sucks, good job.
Try blinking more, or are you trying to scare people? And loss that lisp, that only works in the bay aera. silllyy
DaAmericanHammer 2 years ago
fail. cheater.
unaka2012 2 years ago
Great Job....Keep It Up........
tsfonline 2 years ago
Now don't get me wrong when I rated you 1 star. The only reason I do this is because the reason the level of republicans was low for (most likely) 1 of 2 reasons.
1. It was a completely random sample of population and it just turned out that way which is how a perfect poll is supposed to be taken. With completely randomly chosen people.
2. They tried including that many republicans but as it often is. Some people refused to answer and they were simply removed from the poll percentage.
cnetwoot 2 years ago
5 stars - nice job.
x8rdee3 2 years ago
also this is something that simply happens when a new president gets elected. Since the president won then that means the great majority like him. So at the beginning of the presidency people will like him thus giving a high approval rate. As the months pass, that tends to go down.
The reason why Obama had such a high approval rate was because of the mess that Bush made. People simply lost faith in the republicans.
HerrBismarck 2 years ago
??? I said nothing about his approval rating. I was just correcting his statement about the statistics and the fact that they were most likely done correctly or as best as they can.
cnetwoot 2 years ago
I was adding to your comment. I wasn't attacking you. Hence why I said "also" at the beginning.
But I knew that was going to happen.
HerrBismarck 2 years ago
its so hard to stare like you do.. other than that great videos btw.
Ginji989 2 years ago
thanx Bro..........
equinoxranch 2 years ago
That peanut thing was just nuts (no pun intended.) Did it ever occur to you that the reason we didn't hear about peanut allergies 20 years ago was because people died from them before making it to school, rather than building up an immunity?
BuryMeInGames 2 years ago
That would be a good argument, but 20 years ago we already had ways to treat allergic reactions (on most cases) before they reached the critical stage.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
Is he a jewish zionist?
itrainsinoctober 2 years ago
your right, amarica played no part in winning world war two.
Dr34dmoc 2 years ago
YOUR A NERD
AshleyV313 2 years ago
Interesting, America won the war?
Is this what they teach you in american schools? Actually there were a lot of other countries that were instrumental in WWII.
In fact, the USA didn't even bother to get involved until much later, after the japanese pantsed you guys at PH.
I'm not talking about the ethics of war, I'm not even talking about "what would have happened if the yanks didn't use the nuke". I'm saying that "america won WWII" is about as accurate as "america won the vietnam war"
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Not if your only talking about America. Had his video involved other countries then yes he would have been inaccurate.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
what you said makes no sense.
He said america won the war - that's a bit like saying Guardiola won the barcelona soccer - he just happened to be on the winning side - he did NOT win the match himself.
My other points about the failures of america to involve itself in the war are also valid, in fact, america made profits out of the war before joining it - a habit and mistake that continues to haunt it to this day - see the bullshit in afganistan.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Actually it makes perfect sense. Because he was only talking about America. It makes sense to say America won WWII. If he were only talking about England that saying England won would be acceptable too. Because these countries were on the winning side. It's all about linguistic concepts. So even though I know jack crap about soccer, You can say Guardiola won barcelona soccer, IF your only talking about Guardiola.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
I could say that - but it would be both lying and disingenuous. The fact is that in a group effort, by definition, no one single entity can claim rights to "winning" anything. They can try (and the usa often does), but the rest of the team would rightly be disgusted.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Americas profits are not a mistake. It's when certain politicians decide to trust these sides before learning about them that mistake comes in. But Afganistan is not like WWII. Because in WWII we profited by selling weapons to the allies. (It's called capitalism btw) Afganistan was an attempt to finally make an ally in the middle east besides Israel. Because we never had a huge standing in the M.E.
I admit that was a mistake in Afganistan but are liberal party never could get it right.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
profits are not a mistake?
So - selling drugs to kids is not a mistake?
what a joke - you are attempting to divorce responsiblitity of the vendor of their product. In fact, the usa profited by selling weapons to any one who bought them, not just the allies.
As for your liberal party quip - remind me again who equipped saddam hussein with weapons?
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
You are either the the least informed person on youtube or your trying to trip me up.
Selling weapons to an ally is not the same as selling drugs to a kid. In fact after the war started USA kept business strictly among the allies. It's not divorcing responsibility it's using common sense.
Let's see Hussein came into power in 1979. His weapons were supplied around that time too.... That would make Jimmy Carter the president. So your answer is once again the liberal party.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
Ah, so the liberal party is to blame? nothing about getting motions past the senate?
Nice attempt to dodge the responsibility that the USA has in supplying somone they later called part of the axis of evil, with wepons.
They irony of this is that in the last debacle, american soldiers were being killed by american-produced weapons.
You can blame who you want - the rest of the world just blame the usa for their ongoing stupidity and diplomatic ineptitude.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
I never claimed that the rest of the world was smart. Since mainstreamer only look to point fingers to make themselves feel better. I'm not attempting to dodge anything. I'm simply telling you like it is. Allies betray, that is a fact of life. Grow up already.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
You call the iraqi war a "betrayal"? Breathtakingly ignorant stuff
If anyone betrayed anyone here, it would be the yanks, who very obligingly gave saddam a whole pile of weapons & then turned on them a decade later
since the rest of the world sees the USA from the outside - unlike most of the usa population - relatively, the rest of the world IS smarter on this matter
You can tell me what you think it is till youre blue in the face mate - your grasp of reality is what Im talking about. etc
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
I didn't call the Iraq war anything. Your mincing words. I simply stated that Betrayal is a fact of life. You however proved that you are a cowardly debater.
FYI The US did not betray Iraq a decade later, Saddam became immensly corrupt and began taking steps to eliminate all non-muslim states. (not just the US)
You can't claim to be "smarter" on any issue unless you can see both sides. Outside and In. You fail here.
So in conclusion "mate" I actually have a grasp of reality.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
lol, you certainly did, i just took what you said to their logical extension, I'll help you see it
I said:
"the USA has in supplying somone they later called part of the axis of evil, with wepons.
you said;
""I'm simply telling you like it is. Allies betray, that is a fact of life. "
Ergo, you just said the usa betrayed iraq. lol. perhaps you need to think about it?
you can say "fail" as much as you want kiddo, facts are not on your side.
lol. keep trying though, 10 points for effort. lol
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
You just took everything out of context, How does that put facts on your side?
Think about that, Your not arguing your mincing words and quote mining.
Since you cannot logically form a competent rebuttle that means you fail yet again. So the facts must be on my side because you making your arguments up.
0 points for laziness kiddo. lol
Go back to school, Please.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
Now if your walnut sized mind can finally grasp this. The US supported Iraq during it's battle for independance. However their Dictator took absolute power and began invading Kuwait. So the US stepped in with UN approval. So who betrayed who here? because Facts will show that a former ally actually betrayed us when they attacked a current ally.
Then they preceeded to vengefully build WMD's so we interrupted that and managed to liberate an oppressed people. Oh yeah so much US betrayal here.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
whoops. you made a couple of factual errors there buddy - for a start I'm talking about the current war, not the hogwash that you're babbling about. Here are the facts for your digestion.
1. the 2003 invasion of iraq did not have un approval
2. the intelligence on wmds was not only found to be wrong, it was found to be fabricated.
How dissapointing - yet again, I am debating with a monkey who is not equipped to hold the debate.
Go learn stuff, you intellectually inept, brainwashed monkey.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Whoops. I didn't make any factual errors there buddy. I mentioned the current war did I not? Here are some more facts for digestion.
1. The UN was on board until they discovered that war isn't pretty. (imagine that an ugly war. What a concept.)
2. The intelligence on WMD's was actually strongly supported by the recently abandoned labs and WMD equipment found all over the country.
Your the dissapointment. You can't even research your own facts, just spew out what you've been spoon fed.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
until it was found to be fraudulent.
sigh..
how tiresome you americans can be.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Pre-war evidence was fradulent. Active war evidence speaks for itself.
sigh...
You have a short attention span don't you?
A clear scan of my comment would show the context of pre and active war days.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
Hmm, so you're saying that it's okay to keep killing people even when the evidence that you used to justify the killing, was found to be faked?
Pre war evidence was faked, does that mean the war should continue?
Btw, the UN didn't get involved because the ethics of such a war were seriously shaky - didn't stop the yanks butchering the folks there though, even if the rest of the sane world knew it was a joke.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
No your saying that. I'm saying the united states had probable cause (detective work) when Saddam refeused to allow UN investigators in the country. Remember he was under survelliance as a risk to all nations. The US had to bait the perverbial hook because of the cowardly trend infecting the modern world, but sometimes extremes are necessary.
Btw the UN was involved until 2005 when the other involvd nations pulled out for their own various purposes.
The joke is that so many now deny this.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
For the love of god, are you seriously that damn inept?
Noooo, I'm not saying that it's okay to invade a country even when the justification is fake.. yawn... that is EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE of what I am saying you buffoon!
Look, I'm completely through trying to speak sense to an ape that stumbles around, groping for content and fact. You can dress it all up the way you like, it's all lipstick on a pig mate
You kill people for a faked reason like the usa does, then suffer the scorn of the planet.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Hurts when your own logic is used against you doesn't it? All you have is pathetic name calling. You don't even realize that I've made a monkey out of you.
lol your entertaining. Mind your blood pressure now.
But hey, at least I didn't run away from a problem that doesn't exist.
Next time try counterfacts instead of just repeating yourself. It makes your arguments hard to take seriously.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
But hey I'd be happy to continue a real debate if you can actually do your own research. Because so far the only "Brainwashed monkey" here is the one pointing his finger. You have much to learn before you can hope to continue.
Please go back to school.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
Interesting - so now go do your homework, and the next time you post, tell me where the WMDs are that bush and his cronies were looking for.
Can't find them?
Indeed not - why not? because they don't exist - they never did, and this was ADMITTED by the administration -i.e. that they lied.
Which part of this is confusing or difficult for you to understand?
The funny thing about monkies is that they don't even know what they don't know.
Now run along and find that info before your next post.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Can't find them in Iraq. I'll confirm that.
But you ever notice how close Iraq is to Syria and Iran? Two confirmed enemies of the US? Wouldn't they be willing to hide secrets from their "sworn" enemies?
This is what we call investigation. Try it sometime.
I'm not a fan of Bush, but the evidence is leaning toward him right now.
So are you calling yourself a monkey? Come on you shouldn't be so hard on yourself.
Well that was fun, hope you start reading soon.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
wow, You're the second inept twit that I've met posting here - both are american!, and people wonder why I laugh at americans.
Ah I see, so you don't find weapons in either iraq or syria, and you ASSUME that they have WMDs, even though there is not a single discovery of any?
Assumption, my dear retard, is the mother of all fuckups - i.e. the stupidity that bush pulled your eager country into.
And STILL haven't found any WMDs...
Until you find them mate, its probably best to pull your head in
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
aww, are you trying to have a "I'm smarter than you" pissing contest? I hope so, it's pretty funny to watch
Now, here's your homework task, since you seem to have missed this very important fact;
Run along and find one, any reference to the location of the WMDs in iraq, a news article, anything
now because documents before nov 2005 were shown to be fake, you have to find any documents that were written AFTER that dat.
& heres a promise; I'm not going to bother replying unless you have that proof
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
3,000 chemical/radiation suits. - confirmed
Chemical weapons laboratory not three days abandoned. - confirmed
Sure the pre-war evidence was faulty, but the discoveries speak for themselves.
Ever wonder why Saddam refused to let UN investigators in his country?
Did you forget to investigate?
p.s. no need to be jealous of how smart I am. Reading news from a non-partial outlet really works wonders.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
Lol!, you ARE trying to have a pissing contest!, how come you didn't grow out of that when you are 16, like everyone else?
So let me just check with you, since you claim to be reading from "non-partial" sources (btw, correct english is "impartial" meaning, not partial or biased, but don't let your poor spelling and lousy grammar cloud your hilarious delusions) - which sources ARE you using? just so I can check exactly how "non partial" they are.
"non partial". lol...idiot
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
No I'm just pointing out evidence that you back away from and resort back to your superiority complex and blatant hypocracy. Why didn't you grow out of that when you were 12, like everyone else?
Most of my information actually comes from BBC not ABC but BBC. (btw the time for correct english is uneccessary when dealing with an entertainment unit like youtube, But don't let your narcissism cloud your grotesquely saddening delusions.)
You forgot basic sentence structure. lol...
hypocrite
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
lol, tesdious post, and entirely expected.
BBC reports the "laboratory" they found was somone's HOUSE, not capable of making WMDs (quote from Hans Blix)
Ejecting UN inpspectors is simply that, ejecting them, you can speculate all you like but it is NOT PROOF of WMDs.
Cmon mate, are you seriously making your judgement on this pile of pissweak, and circumstantial dribble?
Fact remains - no wmds were ever found, and usa lied about the reasons to invade.
Deal with it, your goverment are criminal.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Oh right! no one's ever used their home as a make-shift lab for illegal substances... My mistake.
It's probable cause (don't you understand law enforcement) What did Saddam have to hide?
Yeah I give you the proof and you try pissweak and fractured logic to evade it. Cmon mate try an honest debate.
Fact remains- WMD traces were found everywhere leading to Syria and Iran's borders.
Deal with it, You ignorance is criminal.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
Lol. Okay,wait, let me confirm with you that you think a backyard lab in iraq is your proof that they're creating WMDs? Don't you think that, just a little, you're completely misunderstanding the scale of the effort invovled?
lol, strange, even hans blix disagrees with you. Don't you think hans blix would have more of a clue than you?
How arrogant and tedious you americans can be!
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
btw since you are so obsessed with pissing contest. Wouldn't your bad grammar and inability to recognize ebonic idioms make you just as much of an idiot as me? I mean come on you try to play grammar teacher on me and end up missing basic punctuation. lol
I use American ebonics from time to time. Big deal, I'm around it all day.
So when I look back in retrospect, your the one who wanted this pissing contest at the beginning, but laugh at me when I reverse your momentum. textbook hypocracy.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
oh god, how tedious you are.
Like a kid, you're now trying to convince me that "non partial" is a word in current usage by african americans?
it must be truly mind-numbing to be you.
tedious. tedious and boring. we both know it's a stupid fucking expression that doesn't exist. Get over it and get on with it, you meaningless halfwit.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
I'm only throwing your own tedious ways back at you.
Thanks for the rascism btw. Do you believe that only african-americans use ebonic idioms? That's childish wouldn't you say? (Hypocracy?)
It's actually quite fun to be me, I was trained to see through BS and you are the eaisest case I've ever witnessed. Even if you don't leave Iceland often. Try actually visiting America before you try to tell an American what we do and don't do.
Get over it and on with it, narcissim has no purpose.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
This from wikipedia:
"Ebonics is a term that was originally intended and sometimes used for the language of all people of African ancestry"
I'm being no more racist than if I said african americans had black skin.
What else you got mate? going to call me racist for calling saying that the mohawks are native americans? lol, "trained". really. So which part of your ability to see through bullshit makes you still believe I live in iceland? dumbass.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Hmmm.. Did I notice the word "originally" in that description? That means it's not exclusive to the African-American community. Wow! you know your ineptitude for logic is an embarassment.
Your page says iceland, so since I'm turning your own patterns against. that's all I need for a personal attack.
Mind your surroundings grasshopper!
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
erm yes.. ergo - ebonic = usage by african americans.
lol.
keep trying kiddo.
"I was trained to see through BS" - yet you beleive that I live in iceland.
yawn.
what else you got mate? anything sensible? or just more salivating and ranting?
lol. perhaps we should postpone this a bit till you're older?
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Ok, keep repeating yourself It only makes you look inept as you face fact after fact that debunks you. You actually think that ONLY African-Americans use ebonics? Regardless of who invented the concept the behavior is prime for imitation. Even from yours truly because all my friends use ebonics.
Try again kiddo.
Since you obviously are incapable of doing anything new. I will simply restate that I'm using your logic against which allows me to justify my own BS.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
I dont think only african americans use it, I didnt even imply it. Stating that I have red hair does not mean that ONLY I have red hair.
lol.
Ebonics originated with African americans, my statements are still correct. get over it.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Yet you admit my statements are correct?
lol. You forfeit your own reasoning on your whole argument about grammar. Pointing out the obvious now has only reinforced my point. (btw you cave too eaisly under pressure.)
Well feel free to keep posting the comments your not suppose to be posting. I'll answer and continue pulling your strings for as long as you allow it.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
lol
what a strange little boy you are
You can keep imagining that you're steering the conversation, but I'm sorry. You are not
Now. do I admit your statement about ebonics is correct? Sure it is, but so Is mine. Both are correct, one does not preclude the other. African americans are the origin of ebonics, and this has been my point all along.
As for the rest of your post - I have no idea what you're trying to say - it's incoherent, poorly written, and presents no argument. It's just ranting
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
This whole comment proves I'm steering the "conversation." So little boy it seems you want to dance some more.
The fact that my statement is correct (and that you don't live around here) shows that YOU are only assuming.
The reason you don't understand the rest of the comment is because your unable to break it. Nothing to do with my writing your just not thinking deeply enough. Look beyond yourself, because your starting to dissapoint me.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
whoa. now that makes no sense.
lol. you really are screwed up aren't you?
Actually, the reason that I'm having problems decoding your posts is that they are discontinuous, disjointed, poorly written, poorly thought out, they present no argument, they present no legitimate information or evidence.... etc etc. etc.
lol.. yeah ok, you're right, this is getting boring, and I think I'll let you post a few more uninformed rants till you realise you humor me no longer. lol.
gnight kiddo!
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Unablke to break through logic again I see. Or are you just selectively literate?
My comments have followed the same format as your own. So think of what your saying about yourself.
I have stated multiple times that I would copy you.
So While you enjoy your meaningless humor at your own expense. I'll allow you to remain as uninformed because I grow weary of your inability to think critically.
gnight kiddo!
You hypocracy bores me.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
If you are the one steering here why do you jumping head first into simple taunts?
You call me little boy, but you are the eaisiest person to provoke.
I may be young, but why is it that I keep you at the edge of my whims?
Since you claim I have weak evidence, you should have left after the second time you promised to.
Why haven't you disputed all the other WMD materials I've listed?
Why not dispute the trails leading to Syria and Iran?
What about the 3,000 Chem. suits?
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
So do you have anything? Mate? Cause you keep repeating the same pathetic childish insults with absolutely no sense of creativity. yawn. Do you even have the ability to make sense, or completly research a source? Maybe you should check those mobile labs again, hardly someones back yard.
lol when your ready to grow up drop another line.
btw This makes 3 times you've promised to stop messaging me and yet you still do it! That's hilarious.
Keep dancing my little puppet. This is fun.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
suggesting that we postpone till you get older is "promising to stop messaging"?
Strange, I thought it was just suggesting that we wait till we get older.
I notice that alot of your posts are starting to resemble my older posts.
it's also interesting that during almost a direct cut-and-paste of my earlier posts, you make aspirations to my "lack of creativity".
lol, too many of you americans are the same.
Do you really wonder why the world laughs at you?
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Ok since I'm having fun with this I have a few questions for the logical paradox that is you.
If I'm truly so boring, why are you so interested in me? Is your existence more boring and meaningless than my own?
Why am I wrong for being so tedious, but that's ok for you?
Wouldn't unconcious use of an expression you've never heard mean I've heard it from a predecessor?
Isn't the meaning of an existence determined by what one has found meaning in?
"Halfwit"? Takes one to know one huh?
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
lol, for some reason I enjoy baiting ignorant americans - fills in the blanks at work.
A logical paradox is one that disproves or contradicts itself. e.g. "this statement is false" is a paradox. You've simply asked a pile of inane questions, none of which are a paradox. Perhaps this is yet another word you need to look up?
Acutally, I did live in the usa, I left because the entire philosphy of the government was so obviously wrong and lacked ethics; a la invading a country on a faked premise.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Actually you've taken the bait, you promised two days ago to stop replying to me, yet you do it.
FYI: I called you a logical paradox. Because you are a living contradiction.
None of my statements were ment be a paradox. Just a counter to you childishness.
DANCE PUPPET DANCE!!!
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
lol you ARE an odd guy!
What I actually said was "I'm not going to reply unless you have proof" (of WMDs)"
Unfortunatly all you camp up with was a very sad attempt, which I later showed to be false, but I thought merited my response since it was symptomatic of your misunderstanding of the world, & in fact, it directly contradicted opinions of UN experts
A WMD chemical lab in somones house? puhlease
I think you should write "dance puppet dance" a few more times, it gets funnier each time you do
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
I'm just good at what I do.
You said that the first time, So what about the other three? I gave you evidence and you didn't bother researching the right subject to shoot down. So you got no merit for your response because you couldn't even research the right topic.
You brought up the WMD in someones house I simply used logic to demonstrate your naive ways.
Good laughing at yourself is a sign of maturity. Keep it up. You need some serious healing.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
If by "good" you mean bringing up meaningless examples of falsafiable hogwash, then I'll agree. you excel.
Actually, YOU said that the BBC report on the chemical labs was evidence of WMDs in iraq, this is rot.
BBC reported a backyard chem lab, hans blix also stated that they could not make WMDs, you simply lied and assumed that this two-bit operation proved that iraq makes WMDs - there's very little "logic" involved in your misreporting of the facts
btw - it's YOU I'm laughing at, not me.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
Yet I've brought up none... hmmm...
I said I get most of my information from BBC. When you add up all the evidence it makes a strong case worth investigating. Which the UN did not do. You can't think beyond the media at all.
I never lied or assumed. I only gave one example which you are desperately trying to break through. and all you have is 1 article that say 1 SUSPECTED lab was a home. You also didn't think about my argument before trying to counter it. I did hint to dective work. cont...
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
The missing logic here is yours because I have given you the facts that you are unable to seperate your personal vendetta from.
I guess I was a bit premature on your maturity level. Your still in denial. But keep laughing. Ignorance is bliss afterall.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
I was going to save this for when you played the crap out of your Falsafiable mobile labs claim. But I'm bored and theirs nothing good on TV so why not.
Did you ever wonder why only a select number of sources on Mobile Labs and WMD's were released, while the vast majority are classified?
Show me a government that tells it's people the entire story, and I'll show you a nation of corpses.
evilmasterstudios 2 years ago
Grow up.
you're too old to beleive in conspiracy theories mate...
or are you?
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
they found a bunch of chemical weapons. weapons of mass destruction do not have to specifically be nuclear weapons
thundersnake1 2 years ago
What they "found" was nothing more significant than a home-brew, backyard and trivial effort to create chemical weapons.
Which part of "MASS DESTRUCTION" do you think is constructed in a backyard?
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
everybody knew saddam had chemical weapons, but they couldnt find all of them either.
they found alot of mustard gas that was stored inappropriately which made the gas ineffective.
so if they could not find his known chemical weapons and nuclear weapons, does that mean he didnt have any?
thundersnake1 2 years ago
lol, interesting. you think he's guilty just because you say he is. It's interesting because the usa normally has a policy of "innocent until proven guilty" - you, on the other hand, are subscribing to "guilty until proven innocent".
The question you should be asking is: "if none can be found, does that prove he DOES have some?"
If I simply accuse you of having weapons, is that ground enough for me to try to kill you? not in the slightest!
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
no, you are confused. he was killed for killing his own people. your type of arguments dont work here
thundersnake1 2 years ago
ah yes, what you mean to say is;
"you're going to continue to accuse him and believe he's guilty because that's what you've been told to think, and you have no ability to do anything other than what everyone else has told you to do".
You do realise that one of the things that the usa is most famous for is not only it's hypocrisy, but it's competete inability to acknowledge it's own hypocrisy - as you are ably demonstrating.
Good luck with your double-standards mate - everyone else just laughs.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
seems like your jealous because us Americans are a bunch of badasses and you arent.
thundersnake1 2 years ago
lol!
not at all, usa has the highest murder/shooting the fastests growing unemployment and the highest national debt per person in the developed world.
but I like the fact you have no idea. most americans don't.
Seeya kiddo, if you're still deperate to have this inane conversation in a few decades, perhaps we can pick it up then. Until then, I can see you've run out of any valid points to make.
tata!
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
okay sure, speaking from a person from iceland who doesnt even live in America to know how its like.
but maybe you are right, America is starting to get bad in unemployment because of those stupid liberal democrats.
and dont your wish you lived in kennesaw, georgia? a town where everybody has guns and no muders for the last 25 years :)
thundersnake1 2 years ago
if those liberal democrats dont make things worse, America will still be the greatest nation on the face of the earth!
thundersnake1 2 years ago
I just wanted to interject at this point, even though I tired of you long ago, to publically laugh at you.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
the "home brew" killed whole villages of Kurdish people at the hands of hussein.
docholladay2112 2 years ago
So do american soldiers.
What, exactly is your point again? That backyard chemistry sets comprise a weapon of mass destruction that validates an invasion (and an expendidure) on the scale that the americans are currently involved in?
Really? are you typing with a straight face, pictures of reagan and dubya on the wall, and with the "stars and stripes" playing in the background? I hope so, that would be completely consistent with my mental image of you.
bonzonobeans 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
bloodrunsclear 22 years old , wonder how you'll like BHO when the draft starts ?
Need to study LBJ and the vietnam war , you'll find a amazing story , I predict when BHO plan for the economy fails , He will have to send the peasants of to war ,Like all good dictators do ,One thing to remember about BUSH, he was privy to info, so is BHO, that's why BHO just kept BUSH'S war plans,VOTE for BHO 4 more years of BUSH
navyman0290 2 years ago
I love this guy... He's unbelievable.
Reaganite2323 2 years ago
The Republican are a bunch of lying, conniving, rapacious swine, hell-bent on impoverishing the American middle class.
Obama would not have to apologize to the rest of the world if Bush hadn't commited so many crimes against humanity. Kids with peanut allergies will die if they eat peanuts. I'd go into more but I just don't have the time.
MAXBLAYLOCK 2 years ago
Greetings. I'm a lying, conniving, rapacious swine and so is my family. I'd just like to thank you for helping to bring America together in a bipartisan unification, just as Obama promised. I'm glad his is a party of hope, not of hate.
bloodrunsclear 2 years ago
We need a third party in America I'm tired of this Democrate vs. Republican BS! Everyone likes to throw the blame on the other party, all that does is cause hate and its just dumb.
crazynatedog 2 years ago 2
I do agree. I also wish in the meantime both parties could treat the other with respect, not edging out or ragging on one of the other to discredit them.
bloodrunsclear 2 years ago
Comment removed
navyman0290 2 years ago
MAXBLAYLOCK hell-bent on impoverishing the American middle class.
Well I herd though the REP will build the projects with heat , Unlike BHO and tony REZKO .Snikers
navyman0290 2 years ago
39% + 23% = 62%
100% - 62% = 38%
So, 38% of them are independent, I assume. You don't mention the numbers of his approval rating in the pole either. So, you're just spouting cool sounding numbers and not backing them up. You again show yourself to be an intellectual coward. Doing nothing more than staring straight ahead and trying to appear smart!
Droodjerky 2 years ago 2
Poll numbers aren't the point. the poll should be...
33.3% Republican
33.3% Democrat
33.3% Independent
Then we would have a fair representation of the mass view.
DarkWarrior450 2 years ago
Thank you for what you do! I joined You Tube today after dragging my feet for a long time because in order to subscribe to your channel I had to join. Now I am catching up on your videos... all in one night. (I discovered HTWW two days ago but had not gone back to see the previous videos.) You do a good job with the news, short, sweet and to the point!
WorkEqualsFreedom 2 years ago
Sure. You comment on a poll in favor of a Democrat, but nothing on the so called "Polls" ran by UCLA which supposedly said Fox News was fair and balanced.
Why didn't he just register with the username "Fox News the 2nd?" It would be more accurate.
FrostbittenWolf 2 years ago
what a plonker
MrThumbwii 2 years ago
You're a moron. Peanut butter allergies (or any allergies) are an immune system over reaction. The body essentially creates too many anti-bodies for a harmless chemical or molecule, and this causes over inflammation. Being exposed to peanuts does not create "an immunity", they already have an immunity, and that's the problem. Furthermore, the government did not write a law, ordering people to stop, they asked them to, You can still feed peanuts if you want to, just to be defiant.
TheSynesthetic 2 years ago
Hey....you want fixed polls, try FOX. They got plenty for you point out. Lol!
Swordsquire 2 years ago
hey i just figured you out. its all sarcasm...right?
koolkranny 2 years ago
jesus you're a dip shit. KIDS WITH PEANUT ALLERGIES CAN'T EAT PEANUT BUTTER CUZ THEY'LL DIE YOU FUCK!!!! people did not build a small resistance to peanuts 20 years ago, they avoided them just like they do today
stjimmy933499399493 2 years ago
I wasn't aware that allergies could be immunized by repeated exposure to the source. Perhaps over a series of generations this is true?
determinism89 2 years ago
pearl harbour was rigged
mebbmebbmibbmibb 2 years ago
your mom was rigged
collins1188 2 years ago
haha and fox news is perfect? RRRIIIGGGHHTTT...
wrldslmst 2 years ago
It's the number one rated news channel... so relative to EVERYTHING it is perfect isnt it....
collins1188 2 years ago
sorry about the delay... being number one rated does not mean perfection...
wrldslmst 2 years ago
what is perfect for me may not be perfect for you... so why don't you stop talking about perfection like its some objective adjective.
collins1188 2 years ago
ur a genius
Neverletgorox 2 years ago
Comment removed
Luxavius 2 years ago
I don't agree with you very often, but I still think your videos are entertaining and sometimes even make solid points
skitchdrews 2 years ago
87.2 percent of all statistics are made up.
I just made that up, since it seems that talking out of one's own butt is the order of the day for HTWW.
For the love of all that is holy, BLINK, damn you! BLINK!!
DrumWild 2 years ago
Approximately 300,000 Iraqi girls are rapped by American solder , If some did the same to American girls what American will do imagine.That why lots of sucides boom in Iraq. Most of them women and girls. But US media did not show facts in the TV.
MonsterIsrael 2 years ago
where the FUCK did you come up with that statistic (300K iraqis raped by US soldiers). why don't you just say 30 gajillion? i'm not saying the number is zero, but with an outrageous figure like that, you've got to substantiate it.
vcovreson 2 years ago
Nice.... I agree... most news stations tend to have a bias... even the big guys like the New York Times and CBS.....
Its all whichever party has the most money to dish out... just to change the opinions and values of every American.... Freaking tools.
LordNiseb 2 years ago
he blinks once in this video -- kinda weird.
faidin 2 years ago
My friend was eating a snickers (I think), so some peanut got on her hand, so when she passed some different chocolate to one of my other friends, he had a reaction. And as for the media mishaps, did you see Fox's revolution talks on TEA day. The not blinking is scary still.
SaviorOfLogic 2 years ago
Actually, only one in five of children with a peanut allegy will out grow it. But banning peanuts is somewhat rediculous.
radsjeff 2 years ago
Generalized approval polls like that should use a random subset of the population regardless of the sample distribution between parties. I agree that the poll may be skewed to the left, since as you say there are several percent divergence compared to other pools regarding party preferences. There may be many reasons for this, such as a poor geographically diversification of the sample data, but regardless THIS pool showed these results.
Zoiros85 2 years ago
I have a hard time believing that the shortcomings of the pool was intentional. So saying it is fake is taking it too far. Should the media outlets in question maybe have discarded the pool? Maybe, however the media has never been that good at anything concerning numbers.
Zoiros85 2 years ago
shooting pollution particles into the air won't work!! Remember Highlander 2!!
StingrayWorld 2 years ago
You can blink once a while nerdy boy.
viniciusb 2 years ago
Is that an over the top intro or what? You expect Robin Meade after that but you get some nerdy boy reading blog notes from his mom's basement.
viniciusb 2 years ago
Its the peanuts being in a public area where a child or other is exposed to the peanuts. But who cares if a child gets "sick" from the allergy, sick of course meaning their throat swells until they cannot breathe.
I don't believe that America needs to apologize for dropping the A-bomb, but it really seems that you can't tell the difference of bombing a naval base and killing soldiers and bombing two cities, killing over 200,000 civilians.
RobTheChief 2 years ago
don't worry I'm shure FOX news will have a fair balanced poll about Barack's approval ratings. (sarcasm)
mclovinyourmom1218 2 years ago
check out my reply, the poll WAS accurate, howtheworldworks is full of garbage and special effects.
BrightRaven0 2 years ago
Bad ones at that I don't think I need to bring the backwords spinning Earth again that whore has been beaten to death.
mclovinyourmom1218 2 years ago
mclovinyourmom, i don't agree with your ploitics, but i fucking LOVE your username.
vcovreson 2 years ago
is it just me or do HTWW try to be like sxephil just political?
lordtomat 2 years ago
although i like them both, HTWW is no sxephil. he reminds me more of machosauceproductions. sxephil is hysterical.
vcovreson 2 years ago
The outro music reminded me of a zelda game... nevermind
TwilightAronXD 2 years ago
informative video though.
jbcvabeach82 2 years ago
yikes calm down what are you looking at?? it looks like your reading a script
jbcvabeach82 2 years ago
I'm glad you really took the time to explain how the poll was conducted and how most polls use a small sample size. Its great that you explained that the answers were weighted for age, sex, race, region... Thanks for looking into the possibility of some people who vote for republicans responding as independents. You really clarified how this poll was conducted.
Pull your head out of your ass.
EuroCntricHipyChrist 2 years ago
thank you for clearing up da truth, i ain't trying to hear no noise from the new york times, glad you up in here to spit da truth yo
HowDaWorldTwerks 2 years ago
Me, I closed up shop ! Can't afford to be in business any longer and am losing my retirement. Can't wait to get into the bread and soup line and get a hand out from your tax dollars. Ahhh, food stamps and free medical. I can't wait.
BargainHunter8142 2 years ago
I worked hard for my retirement and now I will have to work until I die. The USA will never be able to repay the trillions of dollars that Obama has borrowed. We will be lucky if our great,great, great grandchildren will have the luxury of the freedom we used to enjoy. We are being taxed to death. That surely will give people incentive to open new business and create new jobs. Been there, done that. Can you spell "Socialism?"
BargainHunter8142 2 years ago
I love you, man. You tell it like it is. Piss on the democratics. I have not met one person who voted for Obama that will still not go against him. All I've heard is, "Give him one year.He just got into office. It was the republicans who put the USA in this mess." People, wake up. We are all going broke because Obama is giving our money away. Do you all want to be living in the same cardboard box? That's where we are headed.
BargainHunter8142 2 years ago
bargainhunter, when's the last time anybody got a job from a democrat? as charles barclay said, poor ppl have been voting for democrats for 50 years, and guess what? they're still poor.'
vcovreson 2 years ago
vcovreson:
You totally missed my point entirely. I didn't vote for Obama and .................I am a Republican and not ashamed to admit it. I suggest you go back and read my comments. I tried to find them but they have seemed to mysteriously disappear....Hmmm, must have been a democrat in the house.
BargainHunter8142 2 years ago
bargainhunter, i read several of your posts and i agreed with them 100%. i should have been more clear. my intention was to add to your argument. sorry that i came across like i was disagreeing with you. it should be obvious to anyone reading your posts that you are 'right of central'.
vcovreson 2 years ago
Vcovreson: Thank you and Amen to that....You go bro'....I'll be listening.
BargainHunter8142 2 years ago
OH and I just watched a show about a girl who's peanut allergy is so bad, she shook hands with someone who had eaten peanuts earlier in the day and had to be rushed to the hospital. Yea, let's expose her to peanuts "over time" and watch her die. YOU'RE A MORON
LolaHeart84 2 years ago
Wow, you're an idiot.
LolaHeart84 2 years ago