Added: 5 years ago
From: saintamh
Views: 43,896
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (170)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You guys have to realize the landing radar is underneath the descent stage but a bit ways from the ground compared to those 3 landing probes extending from the footpads. The actual altitude readings are measured from the point of the landing radar and not the extended probes. That accounts for the apparent differences you're seeing from the perceived -vs- actual altitude just before the landing.

  • One of the few vid's that gives me goose bumps even in 240p...

  • does anybody know weather they did start cheering after they landed like on from the earth to the moon and nasa edited it out or was that fiction?

  • I did watch vid,n I'm very much awake,thank u!no dust on pads,no blast crater.landed or perfectly placed there?I would have 2believe placed there.NEWSFLASH:da govt lies 2us!n ususally wit catastrophic consequences!on da scale of lies da govt lies diss is relatively small considering the very low loss of lives.Iran contra was a huge govt conspiracy that other parts of the govt didnt know about,n many ppl died.so don't believe everything da govt spoon feeds u!

  • Of course I watched the video,lol,there is no blast crater no dust on the pads nothing.being placed there other than landing there seems more plausible.I m awake.I don't believe everything the govt tells me.they have lied to us in the past n continue to lie to us often with horrific consequences.2lie about is not a farfetched conspiracy theory,Iran contra was a huge govt conspiracy that no other part of the govt knew about.millions were made and many died.so dude I suggest u wake up.

  • Pics show no dust on landing pads when according to this video there is plenty of dust.there is more computing power in my iPhone than there was at mission control.when GWB discussed going to the moon, NASA said it would take close to twenty years! And the trip would take longer! So I guess technology from twenty years from now is not as good as the late sixties,early seventies? Wake up folks,

  • @rnsone -- I guess you didn't actually watch the video. The dust is all being blown AWAY from the foot pads.

    How would it stop and land on the foot pads?

    But then, some people are mystified by technology. Maybe it's kind of scary to know what kinds of things people can accomplish. It might be best for you not to wake up. Go back to sleep.

  • "Pro!" "Yeah PRO!"

  • At least we who know that the astronauts went to the moon can revel in the glorious truth of it; the moon hoaxers are entitled to their opinion, but don`t let them irritate you; pity them, for they are unable to watch these videos & feel the thrilling truth like the rest of us.

  • @25411959 Did you watch the post first moon landing conference? If not, you should. Then ask yourself if Armstrong and the other two look thrilled. They look downright miserable to me. In fact, they even seem to be hanging their heads in shame at one point. Funny, they all resigned immediately after. Not even one willing to lend his expertise to the following missions? Strange...

  • @Lorieellesh

    Oh christ not that crappy "derhh they look da guilty to me" asshole claim of moon hoaxers.

    They were in a news conference that they knew would be watched by almost the entire planet and kept as a historical video for centures, what do you expect, they'd act like The great Santini and act like egotistical blowhards? Ever been interviewed for TV before? I have, it's nerve wracking because you don't want to FUCK UP and look like an asshole.

  • Alan Bean and Pete Conrad were awesome!

  • @NASAvsPETE Again ...Stop puttin' this graffiti out. You're a full of shit man. THIS DOESN'T LOOK LIKE ANY OF THE OTHER LANDINGS WHATSOFUCKINEVER ! NOR DO ANY OF THE FOOTAGE FROM OTHER LANDINGS.

    Damn man....Your feudal attempts at diversion are sad man. 

  • "Plenty of gas dude" at 4:24 Real cool.

  • hoaxers insult the bravery, hard work and brain power of the astronauts & everyone else involved in the mission - some 400,000 people. One question to them - it was the height of the Cold War, the Russians had led every other step of the Space Race, so how did the USA get the Russians to stay quiet if they weren't actually on the Moon???

  • i wish someone out there would explain all the little terminology they use right after they land........must be shutting down systems, ect

  • @NASAvsPETE: Dude... at least read through what I have written properly before debunking it :)

  • @NASAvsPETE: The LM pilot already called out 18 ft at 4:27. The '24 feet' call is surely there and I have no idea what it meant... maybe something blurted out in the excitement (Which kinda hints that they actually went there) of the landing? Even with contact probes measuring 5 ft, the LM altitude need not be measured from its footpads, especially coz the descent stage is left on the moon. With a reference point within the ascent stage the 'premature' contact could happen even around 14 ft.

  • They never went to the moon. Here's a link to some of the evidence of a hoax.

    spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487

  • sorry , moon landing was real , but they tried to keep us bussy thinking about if it was real or not , when thetrue was WHAT IS IN THE MOON .... think about that

  • @heroicautobotluis yeah man, nice thought

  • @NASAvsPETE

    At 4:25 you start to see the shadow of the contact light probes. In another 10 seconds the 'contact light' call is made. The dust movement is intense. The LM touches town almost immediately. Any reasonable person can tell that they are close to the ground.

  • @NASAvsPETE

    Alan Bean is reading out those numbers from a display but we can all see from the clip that they are near to landing when the 'contact light' call is made. What is your point?

    Incidentally, the contact light probes are 5ft8 long not 2ft. Clearly, you're the sort of person who just makes things up. The idea of a hoax must come quite easily to you.

  • Correction, 5ft6.

  • Comment removed

  • @NASAvsPETE

    what's laughable is the way moon hoaxturds see and hear any old shit they want. there's nothing wrong with the descent rates being called out they were plenty slow fool

  • My birthday is november 19 muhahaha :D

  • @NASAvsPETE

    No, actually the LMs were manually throttled. Go learn something.

  • Kubrick faked it for 'em.

  • land on the moon 1969 cant stop oil leak 2010

  • @yourboycal - great point!

  • At 4:26 does Bean call Conrad "dude"?

  • this was a epic adventure far surpassing anything created on film.

  • Why would they want to fake the landing?

  • Why was there light everywhere at 4:20

  • @spnrulz01 The dust was picked up and blown around by the decent engine, and was scattering the sunlight, which for proper landing conditions (to see craters and big rocks) was equal to being on the Earth at 7am local time.

  • letterman tried to fuck his coworwokers...I'm very proud of Apollo...in fact I want to balloon to the moon if I could...

  • Very interesting comments here concerning hoaxes (of course), liberal nuts, the health care system, and even Letterman and Palin too.

    All in response (somehow) to watching historical footage of Apollo 12's lunar landing.

    Such inspired, witty, and insightful commentary.

    Goofballs.

  • Comment removed

  • As Apollo Astronaut Charles Duke said, "We went to the Moon 9 times. Why would we "fake it" 9 times? Good question for the liberal nit wits.

  • i count 8

    2 lunar orbital

    6 lunar landings

    and definitely NOT faked.

  • Definitely 9

    Orbital

    Apollo 8;10

    Landing 11;12;14;15;16;17

    Orbital..but aborted mission

    Apollo 13

    3 Orbital; 6 Landings

  • You notice how these modern day idiots who think this was faked, weren't even alive when any of this happened? Hussein is great, Michael Moore speaks the truth, the Moon landings were faked, and all we need is more government. This country is finished!

  • the engine blast blew away the loose upper dust, thus, very little lands on the foot pads; all crews reported this phenomenon.

  • at 1:20 "there it is, THERE IT IS!!! Son of a gun!!!" Is he talking about Surveyor 5?

  • I think he's talking about a particular crater that was used as a landmark.

  • what amazing footage

  • This clearly shows the lander displacing the sand and yet there is no diplacement or dust shown on any of the landers.

  • ??? "It clearly shows it displacing sand yet it shows there is no displacement of sand" ????

    Tune down the hoaxtard doublespeak, you didn't make any sense.

  • Dude Your right like I'm so sure we went to teh moon, me an my hoax friends agree with you. Tomorrow we're gonna build a fort, you in?

  • It's a pity that Alan Bean destroyed the camera pointing it to the Sun! He did like the true Mr. Bean! :D

  • REAL........!!

  • What a fun landing that was.

  • That was fantastic!

  • Sweet pinpoint landing with two of the Apollo programme's most colourful pilots. Nice!

  • I blow off the hoax crowd as kooks, just like I do with Liberal Democrats. Just whackjobs.

  • I do too, and I'm a Liberal Democrat.

  • Moon Hoaxers are like the Flat Earth Society. No matter how much evidence that they did go to the moon, they are too stubborn to change opinion.

  • the Flat earth society believes the moon landings were faked too.

  • whats the evidence that they wen't

  • the moon rocks that scientist of all the world studied, the equipment and the pictures of the equipment of the moon taking by the last moon orbiter idiot!!! and the soviets follow them with a radar.

  • How did they fake it then? In 1969 It was easier to do a moon landing to fake it.

  • @ILUXONCHIKBOY

    Are you kidding me? You must be talking about the flag, while the flag was being deployed the inertia causes it to move, and there is no resistance in space to stop it from waving immediatly instead of the astronauts to actually hold it in place

  • @siemenstraffic Yeah right.  50 YEARS ago and we went to the moon. Bwaaaah haha. We didn't even have enough technology today to go to the moon.

  • What studies?

  • Truly one of the best landings I guess. Especially there was some emotion audible, finally!

  • He's got it made! Outstanding landing, Pete. RIP.

  • How do you confuse someone who says this was all a Hoax .. ask then to name all the Commanders of the Apollo Missions. Just watch them stutter as they cant remeber the names of the men they rubbish. I went to a "Moon Hoax" lecture once and stood up and told the idiot talking that he was an Expert. But then an "Expert" is just a has been drip under pressure. Bunch of Idiots.

  • to chucky001001: oh, its real alright

  • (salutes) Such a momentous occasion. Amazing.

  • Frank Borman professed that the Apollo project was all about cold war sabre rattling. NASA sent moon samples to USSR universities. Chances of them not noticing nor wishing to draw attention to a fraud? zero.

    bye bye hoax idiots.

  • chucky001001

    retarded wanker, needs help

  • Watched all the Apollo landings - this one is my favorite. Pete Conrad's excitement is wonderful! The Apollo 12 crew was the closest

    knit of them all, Navy guys and friends for years before the mission. P.S. The moon hoax bunch couldn't change a flat tire, which of course qualifies them as space flight experts.

  • chucky001001...happy to reveal itself as a complete and utter retarded cunt.

  • @chucky001001 Warants please, reasons?

  • NOTICE!

    The International Society of Conspiracy Dorks is starting a Fall membership drive.

    In order to obtain membership, candidates are required to blindly believe all available YT Conspiracy Theories.

    Members will be quizzed on the 911 CT, Moon Hoax CT, JFK CT, Area 51 CT, FEMA Death Camp CT, Illuminati CT, GWB is a Reptilian CT, NWO CT, NO Levee CT, Diana CT.

    Extra credit will be awarded for knowledge of Elvis and Flouridation CT's. Testing will be conducted by mjok. Sign up today. LOL!

  • Is this a genuine offer? If so I'm so in.

  • Do some math here guys.

    He states that they are decending at 99 feet a seond: 1 foot per second = 60 feet a minute

    He states he is at 3500 feet at the time of this rate of decent.

    3 minutes from this time to landing give or take a few seconds

    99 feet a second converted to feet per minute = 5940 feet per minute = 108 kilometers an hour doesn't calculate to me :)

  • 2004...that's why you don't work for NASA. HaHa!

  • Come on fella put down the walkers crisps, the guy is trying to land this thing and your munching and rattling the packet.

  • Lol. RIP Pete Conrad - he's guiding a spaceship to a pinpoint landing on another world and he sounds like he's having a bloody brilliant time!

  • Nice landing Pete. Looks like it would be hard to judge altitude- but thats probably just because of this small view.

  • Think about it.

    1000's and 1000's of journalists around the world.

    Science journalists...investigative journalists etc.

    1000's of reporters working for radio, TV & newspapers in Russia, Germany, UK, China, India, France, Sweden, Poland, Brazil, Australia etc.

    Any reporter who could come up with a shred of legit Hoax evidence would be lauded as a Hero. It would be...THE STORY OF THE CENTURY! THE GREATEST SCOOP IN HISTORY!

    So why is the Moon Hoax still just a CircleJerk of NetTards??? LOL!

  • Hows that menopause going Linda :)

  • The absolute funniest thing about the Hoax Believers is that they actually believe that they have uncovered the "smoking gun". They can't quite wrap their minds around the fact that scientists 10 times smarter than they are, have looked at Apollo data for 40 years. Really TOO funny when you think about it.

    Yep...somebody has to play the role of idiots in this world. Hoaxers have volunteered for that assignment. Without idiots like Hoax Believers...smart people have nothing to laugh at. LOLOL!!

  • Linda I have seen you running around commenting on every moon landing video on the tube whats your reason for that. you trying to convince yourself?

  • im going to work at nasa when i grow up and thats the trut i got my heart set on that job

  • with nonstop videos like these, its hard to see how people still think its a hoax

  • Their going to be going back to the moon in the teens. The russians and possibly the chineese are going to be joining the race. Though the chinese way of landing, even for coming back to earth, no parachutes, no rockets, just a bunch of air bags! BOING! LOL!

  • the air bag is quite good, for robotic probes would be pretty rough for humans though lol. i wish they had gone back to the moon by now and had a plan to go to mars by 2020 also i wish australia played a bigger part in going back to the moon and space travel. besides relaying signals from the moon and sending them onto nasa

  • Yeah, that's their plan for landing humans on a planet. You have to be complately sprapped in place, even each individual finger needs to be strapped in place! If their not, then the part of the body that ain't is going to be shattered! I think that to go to Mars, it needs to be completely international. A little bit of Russian technology, a little bit of American, a little Australian, a little Canadian, a little Chineese, they all need to be combined to make one really good space craft.

  • and in that case the astronauts could be a select few from different countries and the flag they plant would represent the whole world not just say usa or russia

  • That's what I'm hoping will happen. One smaller step to world piece!

  • Well, at least this time the video shows enough sand blast out and red color exhaust flammes! Compare with the Apollo 11 ! They have really improved in f... video's! But the astronauts not improving!

  • THIS is how you should act on the moon...like a kid in a toy store!

  • Son of a bitch, RIGHT DOWN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD!!

  • Son of a bitch, RIGHT DOWN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD!!

  • That was their reaction when they saw the Surveryor 3 probe so near them on the surface.

    How would you react if you were out in the "magnificent desolation" in a landscape that had been waiting lifeless for billions of years and then all of a sudden, there's a man made object sitting right on the surface of the moon! It'd kinda blow my mind, for sure!

  • No Apollo crew were as close nor had as much fun in flight as Conrad ,Gordon, and Bean.They made landing on the moon (our second time),look and sound easy.For anyone who believes we never did this needs to get their head examined.

  • Very impressive footage, if you don't mind my saying so sir!

    Would I be correct in assuming the red bursts of flame seen near landing are from the Apollo12 LEM descent engine?

    .

    My wife prefers to watch the soaps though, I must say!

  • thank u nasa for providing us a "pinhole" view. fucking idiots want all the real spectacular footage for themselves and only feed us this bullshit.

  • Best quality bulls@@t from the simulator though vig' you gottah admit!!

  • Maybe for the next lunar lander...you could recommend a nice Bay Window and French Doors. LOL!

  • My favorite landing. These Navy boys sound more like normal people having the ride of their lives! Watch this episode of "From The Earth to The Moon" and you'll see how much fun these guys had at their job!

  • Incredible ! These guys really got nerves and balls ! Hats off !

  • I love this footage...You`v got it made.Classic line.I hope we return to the moon one day and if I had my way they would take a conspiracy theorists with them and park the lander right next to one of the old Apollo lunar modules and see what they had to say then.

  • and leave them there

  • actully there was dust, it streaked away though in a highly ballistic pattern, unlike earth dust. cuz there is no frickin air on the moon

  • hey but there is dust, u see the fuzzy stuff?

  • yes, but it moves differantly then earth dust, ever see dust on earth move inf ormation? On earth because of air supporting it the dust stays uop a lot longer, almost as soon as the engine cuts off, no dust. you can see it even better in apollo 11

  • I see dust. Isn't there a 911 video you could be questioning? Isn't the "faked moon landing" conspiracy so 20th century?

  • @clomar

    I can see dust, it just isnt so good quality

  • compared to apollo 11, these guys look really unprofessional.. :)

  • The Apollo 11 astronauts probably felt they had the weight of the world around their necks. This obviously wasn't the case for Apollo 12. As Pete Conrad stepped onto the Moon he said "Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me."

  • Personalities. I've met Alan Bean and Buzz Aldrin at different times. Just shook hands and chatted a moment. You can immediately see that Aldrin is all about ideas and business, and Bean is about the joy of life. They probably respond to stress completely differently.

  • I'm 20 years old. although I was not around during the Apollo era, I have great admiration for those who dared to risk their lives to send man to the moon for the future benefit of all mankind. Apollos 1 - 17 werw th greates achievments in the history on mankind. Any perso who says thats thes feats nevr occured should Read Andrew Chaikin's book A Man On The Moon. You'll Eat you words and stick your dumb fat heads back in the sand.

  • I agree, there were even less evidence about Yuri Gagarin's first launch (no videos, no live Tv) and nobody gives a doubt about it. The whole hoax is bullshit, or perhaps it's a hoax by some people studying mind-controlling or hoaxes themselves/

  • The "Hoax people" are just pure and simple idiot's. They are too young, stupid, and moronic to know any better. I'm shocked how stupid the younger set is to believe in such $h!t. they can lose themselves in "Capricorn One" reruns. Who knows, perhaps after watching it enough times they'll even believe O.J. didn't do it.

  • Well I know a lot of young people who know it to be fact that it happened. It's not even a matter of belief, it's a "matter of fact".

    The real problem is the large amount of uneducated people young and old, who cannot solve a simple calculus problem...but they can easily believe a hoax like the moon astronauts were really power rangers, lol. They're crazy and will believe any nonsense, and have no education.

  • MATTER OF MISPLACED BELIEF. Unless you were on the moon, and saw it for yourself, you can't say fact dumbass!

  • Do you believe in viruses? You've never seen one.

  • I hate when people who know nothing about Apollo program (except the hoax mith which was busted years ago) say that moon landing was hoax... The sad truth is that many american and not-american people just like to know about "national secret" - which of course doesn't exist...

    Greetings from Poland for all spaceflight fans.

  • The moon landing were one of those "Where were you when?" moments in time. To all the hoax believers I bet Chris Columbus had the Spanish ppl mumbling that his 1492 voyage had gone nowhere too.

  • Amen!

  • pros!

  • absolutely

  • I love this footage. "He's got it made."

  • yeah your right nwana1977 its great footage. The apollo 12 crew were so much more talkative than apollo 11. Maybe the pressure of landing on the moon wasnt so great second time around. T he quote i like in this piece of footage goes something like "look at that crater right where it ought a be".

  • I know, I felt so much excitement just watching it! I hate not being able to fly to the moon now, looks like the government will be cutting more money to NASA to boost war spending. A while back I used to read PopSci articles saying we'd be back by 2014. Nowadays even 2025 seems far fetched with all the budget cuts.

  • Linda, your age makes no difference and I'm 35. Your age doesn't make you right. It's sad when idiots who are ignorant about space exploration, physics and the high intensity of natural light in space. Without knowing the facts first, you can't say the video above is a hoax because I know the above subjects very well so I know that the video above is a genuine moon landing footage.

  • straydog! You should be proud of your countrymen that could accomplish such a mission.

  • I know NASA had all sorts of props for simulation purposes.  IT'S CALLED PREPARATION!!! You know Stray...at age 36 there is little hope for you. You're just one of many losers in this world. Obviously you're not Deans List material. I just worry about younger more impressionable YT members watching the Hoax Crap, believing it, and being turned off from science and technology pursuits. Remember Hoaxers...a mind is a terrible thing to waste.

  • Don't worry, there will always be young people (like me) which will always fight again conspiracy and monn-hoaxers. If you do space engineering studies at least 1 year, you have enough evidence and logical way of thinking to counter-attack any stupidity of any hoaxer (that have very very rarely scientific bases)

  • Linda ... I may be 36 but I don't look a day over 22 ... That's because my mom has taken such good care of me all these years , while I have been living in her basement wearing my tin foil hat ! ( RIOTIOUS LAUGHTER )

  • We hope you stay in there, we don't need garbage.

  • FYI Stray. The replica moon that NASA used for training purposes had NOWHERE near the detail this video and all the other videos have. The replica was used to help the astronauts get familiarized with the area they would land on. Larger topographic features were included...the smaller features were irrelevant and not incorporated on the replica. FYI...the replica moon has less than 5% of the actual moon features. HOAX BUSTED again...sorry. Try "Camera Man on the Moon" final redux.

  • Shut up fool, you know nothing about apolo absulutly NOTHING, those were used a training grounds you idiot, get your facts straight.

  • You're a moron, we actually have 4 year college degrees and I for one have thoroughly studies mathematics and science. NASA and several international space agencies have even taken pictures of several old lunar landing sites from lunar orbit. You are stupid to say the least, you study a hoax and call it factual....pitty. Hoaxers prey on ignorant people like you without a proper education. These stupid myths have been busted repeatedly, but you don't care anyway.

    Great video BTW!

  • But since you are the voice of calm, rational common sense and never resort to belligerent insults, we should accept the moon landing hoax idea without reserve!

  • @straydog02

    Dude, that was his first mission, how can you say that. Also, we have the technology to land on the moon, but its too expensive to do so.

  • @awey271 .. I have no idea what top secret black ops technology the US military has and neither do you.. What I do know is that Project Apollo did not happen as advertised... There's mountains of evidence of fakery, along with many contradictory and erroneous "moon trip" stories from the men who allegedly landed there 42 years ago.

    If you do some research with an open mind, you will see that the official Apollo record is not true.

  • @straydog02

    Ok, give me a scientific reason why, oh, and keep up the good work on doing research, at least your not one of the idiots that always curse and namecall.

  • @awey271 . Believe it or not, most of the cursig and name calling comes from those who defend Apollo . This subject does seem to bring out the worst in people.

    imo, the science that proves Apollo was a sham is the fact that no animals were sent into & beyond the Van Allen Radiation belts before NASA allegedly sent 24 humans to the Moon during 9 missions.. The Soviet turtles and mealworms sent up during Zond don't count, as they can withstand huge amounts of radiaition, where humans can not.

  • @morg3k Do you believe Jesus Christ was a real person? No, he's a myth. A government hoax.

  • As they said, "Outstanding!". Aren't Americans great. I wish we could getthis sort of casual enthusiasm from our astronauts again. Thanks for the vid.

  • What an incredible feat. Hat is off to NASA. All you Hoaxers...get out of your Moms basement, take off your tinfoil helmets, get a job. Order not important. LOL

  • I hate the stunning ignorance...the oxy-moronic smugness, i suppose your a Christian? - go buy an ipod or something... or better a soul

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more