There a Creator ? part 2. Through the Wormhole with Morgan Freeman 1080p HD

[watchWorld100]

i wonder what einstiein's reaction would be if he sees this video? "wow! i can't believe future scientists are fame seekers not truth seekers."

[gjm346]

the last theory reminds me of spore

[lastsundance]

bald dude looks like maynard james keenan. lol

[randy95023]

Dude! I do NOT want to burn in hell for eternity for reducing God to some computer geek with a pocket protector. If quarks are just some high tech form of "pixels" then maybe our "God" IS just a chubby guy in His mom's basement. I'd rather not think about that...

[weezierful]

@randy95023 Haha I love your comment.

[RAAAJcom]

If I am part of a computer simulation , some requests...all humans definitely need more memory, better memory management, and easier memory transfers (Wasting 1/3 of our lives re-learning a fraction of what is important to know is a pain in the ass).

[entwisenva]

D.R.E.E.A.M.S. Dynamic Reality Encapsulation Energy Analysis Matrix Simulations

[entwisenva]

Welcome to your own personal dream worlds. The rise of the machines DID happen. DNA is just another programming language. I recommend studying Object Role Modeling, Google it. Buy the brown book by Dr. Terry Halpin on the subject if you want to be able to model how things actually work. :) Have a nice day! This has been a public service announcement.

[ThemOldaBoys]

Wait wait so if computers will have the 500 times the power of a human...

We could just create our own worlds? And not worry about trying to find out who built our world?

[chingchombuela]

when scientists say they don't like a theory because it means there further from an explanation, it makes me think they just want to be satisfied in there mind and not know the truth. if that guy's correct, then the creator probably won't be our future selves because we are just computer programs, right?

[haze122112]

so basically we are all keanu reeves

[MrNncon]

in a situation like that. how do u prove whos real and whos not?

this raises to many questions, am i and 800 others real? are the rest of u not? is this something we did do our self because a space ship is exploding and we want more life?

its pretty cracker crack pot

[MrNncon]

the second article is a little radical and speculative. its bad science until you discover it.. im reminded of the crack pots who had very limited spiritual and science offerings of the 80s

crack pots who watch the matrix and try and make the world in too something..

until we see actual data or poof in the "matrix code" u cant jump to the conclusion.. lol its pretty crack pot. just on the basic theory u should keep yer mouth shut until proven other wises your just a guy with mental issues

[TheBigImpulse]

if god has a computer game and we are a simulation, i wanna apply for GM :D

[slowmonkey156]

10:04 "And if I believe that the human is consious and self-aware, I must also believe that the machine has the same qualities". That is absolutely NOT necessarily true. I'm so sick of hearing that.

[HeavySpinna415]

@slowmonkey156 Lol im with you on this one. Sounds ridiculous

[TenaciousTeun]

the movie The Matrix is in my opinion a new sort of bible. And the time is now to choose the red or the blue pill...

[panyidavid]

Really? You're showing the awsome graphics of computers with sims?

[lguembes]

@panyidavid I thought the same thing

[CHOTICHATRI007]

ONLY HOLE I KNOW IS WARM HOLE I GO THERE EVERY NIGHT

[manonfireb4u2]

so if this is a virtual reality world and we are actually laying on a chair. someone could speak to us out thier and we w translate it in here as god or aliens. interresting. and if we zap ourselves with electric pulses in here we might disturb the game out thier. so did the girl actually wake up out there for amomment? interresting.

[fluker824]

computer simulations LOL

I think that guy seen the matrix too many times

[PoeFlow]

I need dat Playstation 12.

[karimrakha]

@PoeFlow loooooooooooooooooool

[jccarbunkle]

The lines at 13:03 look like a dialect of lisp

[lostfnvegas]

Id like to combine my fist with both their faces

[KillerWhaleSFl]

I'd like to combine that god helmet with some shrooms.. 

[INGLORIOUSVictorious]

without religion there wouldnt be science.

[zauii89]

@INGLORIOUSVictorious

Without science we'd still live in caves, don't give creed to religion ffs.

[ateosb]

The argument that reality exists as a infinite series of creators controlling computer simulations gets you no where. Eventually your going to have to answer the question of who created the first creator.

[Ninja9191]

I'm not bashing or something. But I believe pixels don't interact with each other the way quantum particles do, this doesn't sound like a legit comparison to me..

[sk8shred]

If "God" made up all this stuff....

Why the fuck won't he show us he exists...

Atheism

[BetroS83]

@sk8shred If your an Atheist then why dont you kill yourself? What is the point in living if you die and have no memory of your life? Absolutley pointless!!!

[sk8shred]

@BetroS83 Because why not?? Im aware that i'm living and that's great.

There's no need to kill myself I have friends, family, i love nature, i love talking to people etc. I love living.. but i don't need a god for that... a god doesn't make sense at all.

Why the fuck won't he show us that he exists? he ain't there xD and btw science shows us a logical explaination for ecerything

[3212333222333]

"You ever have that feeling where you're not sure if you're awake or still dreaming? "

"All the time. It's called mescaline, it's the only way to fly. "

[doorrobotics]

Funny that they show a Buddha statue while talking about god when Buddhism does not involve any entities whatsoever.

[crosbying]

@doorrobotics well actually, Buddhism is divided into realms, one them being the realm of the gods, but even the gods are subject to the infinite reincarnation, and therefore by having good enough karma, anyone can enter into that realm. But to be truly free, you have to stop the reincarnation by reaching nirvana

[786HKHM]

What about the fact that that's how God communicates. That is by modulating our neuro-physiology. what if GOD is infinite universes and MORE.

[xxYdoxxx]

@786HKHM

Then your definition of God is "Universe"

[csmcmillion]

@786HKHM > What about the fact that that's how God communicates.

You should look up the definition of "fact".

[logopod1]

you can tell when morgan freeman thinks the idea is ridiculous

[MrNovart]

i really should make my homework but this is way more interesting :D

[MrWorshipMe]

uhm, since when do we know time is quantized?! I must have missed a very big scientific discovery there...

there are many non discrete quantities in our world, most numbers are irrational...

the existence of Pi is a VERY strong reason to believe god in not a programmer.

[stijnisgoed]

@MrWorshipMe Look up Planck time on Wikipedia, it's the shortest time span that has any meaning. Therefore, we couldn't test wether shorter time differences exist. Pi only 'exists' as a mathematical object, not as a physical object and isn't measurable in any way. The same goes for all irrational numbers.

[MrWorshipMe]

@stijnisgoed You do know that Planck length and time are not very mainstream right? no physicist knows anything about scales in which gravity might or might not interfere with quantum theory, as no one has a good theory about the subject.

Even those who use Planck length and time for their loop gravity and super gravity and what not don't know if they should use hbar or just h to calculate this lenth and time.

Also, if all numbers were rational, no chaotic precession could occur - and it does.

[MrWorshipMe]

@stijnisgoed since we are incapable of observing infinity, it is impossible to prove that three body motion never returns over the same exact pattern twice - but mathematically, according to the known laws of motion, it shouldn't and I see no reason to believe it does unless your axiom is that no irrational exists, and then I can not prove you anything...

[stijnisgoed]

@MrWorshipMe I do accept that you can prove mathematical statements using irrational numbers, and that those statements can be associated with the physical world.But I don't see why this would mean that irrational numbers 'exist'. We can mathematically construct a 100-dimensional space, but does that mean it really exists?

[stijnisgoed]

@MrWorshipMe Secondly, given for example the ZFC axioms of set theory and Gödel numbering, you only need a finite amount of binary numbers to proof what you just said, so why would it be a very strong reason to belief God is not a programmer?

LOL, just realised how strange this discussion is, given I don't even believe in God :)

[MrWorshipMe]

@stijnisgoed I did not understand this part: "you only need a finite amount of binary numbers to proof what you just said", I would be happy if you could direct me to a source, so I can get smarter :)

I agree that mathematics concepts are not essentially true in reality, I am not a Platonist.

But, chaos theory is a good reason to believe in Irrational numbers - if all the numbers were rational, chaotic precession would eventually repeat themselves... and I don't think this is very probable.

[stijnisgoed]

@MrWorshipMe Using Gödel numbering, you can assign a unique number to every mathematical axiom and every proof. That means that everything we know (or even everything our minds can comprehend) can be represented in the form of a finite amount of numbers, including the 'mathematical existence' of irrational numbers.

[MrWorshipMe]

@stijnisgoed He also showed this set is never complete... look up Gödel 's incompleteness theorem... This actually makes my point even stronger :)

[stijnisgoed]

@MrWorshipMe Indeed the set is never complete, but a computer programmer with a computer (much) more potential than our universe could make a set of proofs that is large enough to fool us into thinking we don't live in a computer simulation, while actually we do (hypothetically). Because everything we can think of, has already been thought of by this hypothetical supercomputer. And that is what the original argument was about.

[MrWorshipMe]

@stijnisgoed Maybe we are the grand simulation's way of creating this infinite list of mathematical arguments :)

Also, the computer may calculate on demand the detail scale we measure, so nothing is infinite, like fractal simulations...

As a side note, I too don't believe in god, but saying things like "god is \ is not a programmer" to me is like saying "god doesn't \ does play with dice" - it's a way to speak about nature, that's what Einstein did :)

[MrWorshipMe]

@stijnisgoed So according to the logic in my previous post, a tree falling in a forest with no one to hear it does not make a sound :)

In conclusion, I could not find any good reason to believe we live in a simulation, and since our senses are limited we will never know :)

I suspect that's the conclusion of most philosophical arguments concerning reality...

It was nice thinking about it though.

[arseymcpherson]

@MrWorshipMe 'In conclusion, I could not find any good reason to believe we live in a simulation'. Haven't the researchers in this video given you good solid reasons?

[MrWorshipMe]

@arseymcpherson LOL

[stijnisgoed]

@MrWorshipMe I don't know much about chaos theory. The only thing I can say is that our universe may be just a very good approximation of one in which chaotic precession never repeats itself, because - as you said earlier - we cannot observe for an infinite amount of time.

[MrWorshipMe]

@stijnisgoed Also, if there are no irrational numbers, and the smallest length is Planck's length, then our universe can not be anisotropic, since some rotations are impossible (they produce irrational multiples of the unit length).

And if I go one Planck to the side, and one Planck up, what is the distance between where I was to where I am? 2 Planck's? How then can x^2+y^2=d^2 be true at the large scale?

[stijnisgoed]

@MrWorshipMe That's a very good question. Hadn't thought about that yet. I don't know the answer. I don't know enough general relativity (hardly any) and quantum mechanics to say anything useful about that.

[DJmixmastermicro]

Buddhism has NO god. How misleading that Buddhism gets lumped in with God-obsessed cults like Christianity and Islam. In fact at the core, Buddhism is Atheistic, or at least Agnostic. A main belief is "Emptiness": there is no self, no soul, no god, no creator. If you look past the external appearance of religious rituals that are a natural result of being in a culture, you will see that Buddhism is actually a science of humanity thats been around for 2500 years. The concept of Zero is Buddhist.

[pixusbubblejet]

@DJmixmastermicro. this show is made from a judeo-christian western point of view, so even if they are atheist scientists they still grew up in that culture and so assume other non-western philosophies are the same christianity, when in fact they are not.

[TheBalamik]

@DJmixmastermicro actually Buddha, Jesus, Moises, Mahoma can be considered philosophers that had a spiritual experience or enlightenment.

[DJmixmastermicro]

@TheBalamik. at the end of the day, there is no historical evidence anything great actually happened to those people. the existence of jesus as a person is even debated. at least buddha and muhamad have historical evidence to prove they were actual people. the evidence of their spiritual experience can be surmised in the results of their teachings.

[elasticaddict]

that induced experience reminds me of an LSD trip! very similar. imagine doing that experiment while LSD !?

[elasticaddict]

the experience they induced in that girl reminds me of what happens sometimes during an LSD trip.You get this overwhelming sense of being connected to god and to the universe and everything in it...very cool feeling..wow imagine doing this experiment with the helmet while on LSD..shazaam!!

[Joeysnamehere]

It is facinating the way he describes the way God, or the idea of a "creator" or "intelligent design" may be nothing more than an electrical impulse in your temporal lobe. This doesnt mean I agree with it or do not believe in God, I am just saying it is facinating and would explain much about religious conquests of seeking facts about the religious community. Hopefully folks will not take this out of context.

[bentgenius1]

bentgeniusdotnet a fresh look at god and religion.

[falidy]

Scientists that believed in God:

Copernicus

Newton

Galileo

Pasteur

Pascal

Boyle

Leibnitz

Einstein

And hundreds more...

[MrWorshipMe]

@falidy Including Einstein in your list makes your concept of god pretty mute.

He did not believe in a miracle working, all knowing, super natural god with or or without a son.

Also, what does a list of people believing something has to do with this something actually being true?

If people believe something to be true on the grounds of evidence, then the list of evidence is what you need list to convince someone this thing is true.

But if there are no evidence... no list of names can prove it.

[falidy]

@MrWorshipMe Einstein believed in a super intellectual being that created the world. This pretty much fits the definitions Muslims provide on God - I'm not saying Einstein was a Muslim - Its true he did not believe in a miracle working God but he did however believe that God - Who created the laws of physics - can adjust and mutilate the laws of physics causing "Miracles" because even if we with our limited minute knowledge and resources can play with the laws of physics then what can God do ?

[MrWorshipMe]

@falidy I wonder where you get you "facts" from... try reading about Einstein's views before you write such nonsense... try this: type in wikipedia Einstein, and go to the page dedicated to his views on religion for starters.

You might also want to read on Spinoza too.

Einstein most certainly did NOT believe in an intelligent being, Einstein's god has neither intelligence, feeling, nor will.

Also, no human managed so far to change the laws of physics, I don't know what you mean.

[NOyaPara]

@MrWorshipMe everything you said is true ... i would just like to add that he was a so called deist which is exactly what you described ...

[flyboynextdoor]

the universe created computers, not the other way around genius



[flyboynextdoor]

If we are conscious beings how could we be imagined or a simulation?

I think therefore I am. René Descartes

[ronnyboy6o]

@flyboynextdoor Exactly, which means our consciousness is separate from our physical bodies (not produced by brain), and it not only 'imagines' your external reality, but your body and brain as well b/c that's what can properly experience what we call physical reality in.

[danielvutran]

Uploaded on my birthday! lol

[icedilli25]

I like watching this kind the stuff, science and learning but most, almost all of my friends don't ..... is there something wrong with me? or them?

[flyboynextdoor]

@icedilli25

No

[Joeysnamehere]

@icedilli25 Einstein even said it himself "the question that sometimes drives me hazy: am I or are the others crazy"

There is nothing wrong with that, not even kinda. I am similar to you. Having a thurst for knowledge is a very healthy thing. It means you want to make sense and rationalize things, or simply, you are just a curious person in general. It is people like that which begs questions now, so they can be answered (sometimes wrong) that constant questioning only inspires knowledge.

[SargeO88]

That girl is TOO cute!!! Whoo!

[terrait]

ultimate troll girl

[JohanssonJ92]

@terrait No its true, ive had it done too, the brain is easily fooled if you know how it works :)

I "felt" some thing surrounding me, didn't see my own body tho.

[YPicanda]

wish I can see the whole documentary not seperate parts either missing or been removed.