I see in the future if American people really start awakening that they might let bush and some others burn, in front of people, and then put them in some fancy houses like they did before!!? What you need is a system change where new people come to power and take all the power out of evil's hands. That is the only way, everything else will be just a show off...
soldiers are just dumb docile cunts who would do anything they are told to without questioning anything.... Israel, china, Pakistan all own nuclear weapons... why don't you invade them...
Actually, Bush is above the law in his mind and in the minds of the international banking elite, slave masters. Repeal Bretton Woods Treaty and restore the U.S. Constitution back to We The People! Repeal the 1903 Dick Act while we are at it! Do it NOW! Or, take back your two vital powers on the state level. Its your only chance to reverse the New World Order peacefully.
Not only is Bush not in jail, he is on Oprah selling books and laughing it up with her. Oprah and Obama are just as bad as Bush. Oprah: You are just as guilty as Bush. You have had you popular talk show for 10 years since 911. You have been hogging up the airwaves all this time. You better have a trick up your sleeve with Obama-OR ELSE! I am not kidding here-this is a VERY serious topic-we are talking about the entire Earth civilization, Lady.
i think 'treason' might be a more accurate description of Bushs crimes...however...i wish this MAN (very few around) the best with his book and his efforts.
what kind of coward talk is it that president can't be prosecuted because that makes him/her affraid to make difficult decisions.
President and leaders should be even more accountable than anyone else because of the wage of their decisions. That only helps to keep them of taking things lightly on important issues and possibly helps to keep out corrupt people from those seats.
Why is it that leaders life should be more important than civilians and soldiers?
@linzki What kind of leaders are they if they are not ready to sacrifice their lives even more than a common citizen. Those kind of leaders are not worty to be leaders.
9/11 was not an inside Job how can you dare to say this, they were Islamic terrorist and they took the planes ok and then they fly the planes into the WTC, as easy as such, and the planes as soft they are built have gone through all the steel, without damage like a rocket, because these terrorists used arabic new invented high stable planes with stable coating extra to do this and they colored it AA, but in fact these planes came from the cave in Afghanistan where Bin Laden built them.
Maybe Dubya misfired on 'a good reason to tell us that he's sending the military in,' but I'm pretty sure that Halliburton needed work to do (whatever 'reason' you package it in). ... Dubya didn't KNOW that all the lies were lies; If you were told those lies were probably true with a possibility that they weren't, which way would you rather be wrong: the way that kills a lot of U.S. SOLDIERS or the way that kills a lot of INNOCENT U.S. CIVILIANS?
@kojekish If I saw him because he and others in crooked Michigan government started my anxiety attacks and great shocks well I wouldn't know what I'd do to this psychopath Bush doing harm to peoples lives.
This lawyer is a scum bag. Let's see him prosecute OJ or some actual killers. He's too much of a chicken shit. Everyone hates Bush now sure this scum bag lawyer pops up in the lime light. He's a piece of shit. Name one person that Charles Manson killed where there's actual proof. Manson convicted himself because he was delusional. Anything you said about Manson he would shake his head yes and say yes that's me.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
People who join the United States military chose to do so full knowing the risk that there is by joining. It is bad that they had to die, but we can not blame the President for trying to help.
Gooseman, don't get into with this guy. All his questions can be answered in the debate he and I had. Why be redundant. This guy clearley has Bush derangement.
Simple minded "folk" tend to ignore the facts in favor of the status quo. But the overwhelming evidence to prosecute GW Bush as a murderer has been here for a long time. Just after a year in office it became clear that him and a group of cronies were duping the public and conspiring against the world. He is subject to full prosecution for 911 and Iraq. I didnt condone Hussein. But his death is a result of an unjust invasion. There are no rights as a result of the war. Built on blood is bad.
@financialclips He also had at these murders a trumped front to terrorize&destroy US citizens lives by being the first to sign the patriot act. For our protection? Believe me Bush-child hating pedifiler wasn't out to help the US or he would've gave a damn when I sought him to get me out of hell hole corrupted Michigan. MI government causing child endangerment, stealing big financially from me, of course not abiding in laws against abuse & discrimination of kids,& thugstrying to put me in jail
@financialclips there actually a book out from a former soldier or something that actually proved that saddam or osama actually did have some chemical weapons after all but it was never allowed to surface to the media back here
If Nazi war criminals are found 65 years after they committed their crime, should they still be prosecuted?
If someone convinced others to drop a bomb on your church killing thousands of your friends by telling others that terrorists were using the church to plan an attack, but it turned out to lie, but they were not caught for 10 years, should they be prosecuted?
If someone convinced others to blow up your child's school by telling them that it was really a weapons factory, killing your children and thousands more, but it turned out to be a lie, and the person was not caught for 20 years, would you still want them prosecuted or would you say, "Well, that happened a long time ago. Let's just forget about it."?
The purpose of prosecution is to deter others from doing the same thing in the future.
Everything we were told about Iraq was a lie. BS EVERYONE KNOWS SADDAM HAD WMD'S. HELL HE USED THEM ON HIS OWN PEOPLE. MONDAY MORNING QUARTERBACKING IS GOOD FOR YOU AND I. IT'S NOT SO GOOD WHEN YOUR THE PRESIDENT. THANK GOD FOR W! THX FOR KEEPING US SAFE
Saddam did not have Weapons of Mass Destruction. Yes he did, we know he used them on the Kurds. Military experts believe he shipped them to Syria. For arguments sake, let's say he didn't, if something would've happened say Arizona got nuked and it got traced back to Iraq. You'd be the 1st one in line calling for W impeachment saying he received a memo and did nothing. You can't have it both ways. Yeah invading Iraq propted 9-11. Oh that's right 9-11 happened before we invaded Iraq. SIMPLETON
The stuff Saddam used on the Kurds were not WMD's. First of all the US gave him that stuff. Second it took many units of that poison to take out a full city block. The WMD's Bush said he had were a thousand times more powerful where one hit could cover tens of city blocks. Bush also claimed he had UAV's and almost nuclear weapons. Saddam never had any them. Even your hero Bush the chickenhawk had to fess up to that. It's sad you claim there were even after Bush admitted there never were any!
It amazes me how all you Bush ass-lickers can only say Bush kept us safe. Unfortunately that's all you can say. Never do any of you give one detail other than Bush kept us safe. Give me one detail. However it can't be a lie, a lie/failure of a war, something illegal or a violation of the Constitution. Saddam didn't have WMD's! Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld all admitted there were no WMD's! Stop being in denial and nothing more than a stubborn partisan.
Once again you can't give me one detail. He called our Constitution a god damned piece of paper. Ever heard of the fourth amendment? Illegal search and seizure? Bush allowed for illegal warrantless wiretapping. Violation right there! You assume just because i don't like W I'm a dem/lib. I'm neither. I hate em all. Al Qaeda? AQ is the CIA Arab legion. It was created by Robert Gates. Saddam Never had WMD's. If intelligence showed he did, It would of should him moving them to Syria.
January 2005 i the Oval Office. Just search for it and you'll find it. All your phone calls, my calls are recorded and stored. Don't you remember the immunity Bush gave the telecommunication companies to do so? Saddam used poison. Poison weapons. Not weapons that cause destruction, massive damage. It took many many hits of that stuff to take out one city block. The weapons Bush said Saddam had could take out tens of blocks with one hit.
3,000 people were killed on 9/11 while Bush was President, one month after he received a memo titled "Bin Laden determined to attack inside the U.S.", but Bush did nothing.
How did Bush keep us safe?
Since Bush invaded Iraq, 4,000 American soldiers have been killed and 30,000 are permanently disabled.
How did Bush keep us safe?
And hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been killed. For what?
he received a memo titled "Bin Laden determined to attack inside the U.S.", but Bush did nothing. He also received a memo from the British intelligence saying Saddam was getting yellow cake and selling it to Al Queda. W DID SOMETHING. THX W FOR KEEPING US SAFE!
What if Saddam had invaded the U.S. based on the same lies that Bush told us about Iraq, and killed hundreds of thousands or millions of Americans, should he be prosecuted for war crimes or would you say, "Oh well, he thought he was doing the right thing. Let's just forget about it and move on."?
If they don't prosecute Bush, then this allows every other leader in the world to invade other countries based on lies that "Well, we feel threatened".
If Bugliosi is wrong, let someone come forward and prove him wrong by writing a book DEFENDING Bush. Every defendent in a courtroom has a right to a defense attorney. Bush would be no exception to that rule. Even Mr. Bugliosi would acknowledge that.
I would have liked to have heard Bugliosi's response to the lady's question at the end of the segment where she asks him if he's been on Bill Maher's show. Why hasn't he had him on?
Bush and Blair were found guilty of war crimes in Malaysia Tribunal... Dec 2011.. google it
earthicastar 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@earthicastar "Bush and Blair were found guilty of war crimes in Malaysia Tribunal... Dec 2011.. google it"
Whoop-ti-doo. A fourth-world banana republic full of sound and fury that signifies nothing -- the international equivalent of that has-been Buglosi.
XNMR53 4 days ago
Buglosi is just another old ambulance chaser trying to reclaim his lost fifteen minutes of fame.
XNMR53 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HANG HIM!
contessabaldelli 3 weeks ago
IT Was Murder and Daddy Saved HIM HOW..???? BUSH and OBUMMA are KILLERS.../ Murderers and not held accountable for it..? WTF...
TheAnonymouse01 1 month ago
I'm so happy for the the people of America and the rest of the world that Vincent Bugliosi has the balls to go against pure evil.
evraisgod 1 month ago 2
The fact that he was able to get on air and talk about it with a bunch of reptilians raises some alarms for me, lol.
Gameguru667 1 month ago
the war drums are beating again, they want to bomb Iran, Ron Paul wont allow that..RON PAUL 2012
Dolphster69 2 months ago
What about Chenny, Rumsfeld, Carl Rove, these bastards need to be charged in the same case.
GodBuddhaChrist 2 months ago 2
I see in the future if American people really start awakening that they might let bush and some others burn, in front of people, and then put them in some fancy houses like they did before!!? What you need is a system change where new people come to power and take all the power out of evil's hands. That is the only way, everything else will be just a show off...
AnglesM888 2 months ago
Comment removed
Ozzmancometh70 3 months ago
Murder is an understatement...
S0up3rD0up3r 3 months ago
soldiers are just dumb docile cunts who would do anything they are told to without questioning anything.... Israel, china, Pakistan all own nuclear weapons... why don't you invade them...
TheUndertakerSaysRIP 3 months ago
Vince is wrong about LBJ and Vietnam.
Tsnore 3 months ago
LP III CASE CAN DO THIS VINCENT.
TheRenaissancePen 7 months ago
Actually, Bush is above the law in his mind and in the minds of the international banking elite, slave masters. Repeal Bretton Woods Treaty and restore the U.S. Constitution back to We The People! Repeal the 1903 Dick Act while we are at it! Do it NOW! Or, take back your two vital powers on the state level. Its your only chance to reverse the New World Order peacefully.
SupraSovereign 8 months ago
Not only is Bush not in jail, he is on Oprah selling books and laughing it up with her. Oprah and Obama are just as bad as Bush. Oprah: You are just as guilty as Bush. You have had you popular talk show for 10 years since 911. You have been hogging up the airwaves all this time. You better have a trick up your sleeve with Obama-OR ELSE! I am not kidding here-this is a VERY serious topic-we are talking about the entire Earth civilization, Lady.
gooty64 8 months ago
America is so right wing their not even taking in to consideration what he's stating
thebeefdancer 9 months ago
i think 'treason' might be a more accurate description of Bushs crimes...however...i wish this MAN (very few around) the best with his book and his efforts.
steveahmann 9 months ago
what kind of coward talk is it that president can't be prosecuted because that makes him/her affraid to make difficult decisions.
President and leaders should be even more accountable than anyone else because of the wage of their decisions. That only helps to keep them of taking things lightly on important issues and possibly helps to keep out corrupt people from those seats.
Why is it that leaders life should be more important than civilians and soldiers?
linzki 9 months ago
@linzki What kind of leaders are they if they are not ready to sacrifice their lives even more than a common citizen. Those kind of leaders are not worty to be leaders.
linzki 9 months ago
Fuck Bush!
Cocksucker needs to rot in hell.
aaronjason0404 9 months ago
9/11 was not an inside Job how can you dare to say this, they were Islamic terrorist and they took the planes ok and then they fly the planes into the WTC, as easy as such, and the planes as soft they are built have gone through all the steel, without damage like a rocket, because these terrorists used arabic new invented high stable planes with stable coating extra to do this and they colored it AA, but in fact these planes came from the cave in Afghanistan where Bin Laden built them.
SeashoreaTRUTH11 9 months ago
I love how the girl on the right adds nothing to the conversation.
riovouga 11 months ago
the BUG is insane!!!
kfag101 1 year ago
Maybe Dubya misfired on 'a good reason to tell us that he's sending the military in,' but I'm pretty sure that Halliburton needed work to do (whatever 'reason' you package it in). ... Dubya didn't KNOW that all the lies were lies; If you were told those lies were probably true with a possibility that they weren't, which way would you rather be wrong: the way that kills a lot of U.S. SOLDIERS or the way that kills a lot of INNOCENT U.S. CIVILIANS?
mythmanjay 1 year ago
what decides what murder is? philosophy anyone? cmon join me
MrSkate4weed 1 year ago
Bush should go and kill himself, because who did 911 !
kojekish 1 year ago
@kojekish If I saw him because he and others in crooked Michigan government started my anxiety attacks and great shocks well I wouldn't know what I'd do to this psychopath Bush doing harm to peoples lives.
RobinSpence100 11 months ago
This lawyer is a scum bag. Let's see him prosecute OJ or some actual killers. He's too much of a chicken shit. Everyone hates Bush now sure this scum bag lawyer pops up in the lime light. He's a piece of shit. Name one person that Charles Manson killed where there's actual proof. Manson convicted himself because he was delusional. Anything you said about Manson he would shake his head yes and say yes that's me.
x11115 1 year ago
This lawyer built a false plot about Charles Manson. He even admitted it.
x11115 1 year ago
I don't like that news from the west completley overlooks the death toll on the civilians in Iraq. It's always "4200 American Soldiers dead!"
Did they forget about the millions of civilians?
ChiOwnsYoursoul 2 years ago
So, in order to preserve the union, the president ISN'T... accountable for fomenting war?
zdrceny 2 years ago
Yeah Saddam used chemicals on the Kurds "13 YEARS!!" before 9/11. So why use it as the reason for the invasion now?
Who sold Saddam the Chemical Weapons in the first place, or has that one conveniently slipped everyone's mind?
Depleted Uranium IS a Weapon of Mass Destruction, and of the worst kind, but none of you are complaining when the US use them, I wonder why that is?
Go "Baa aaa aaa ck" to sleep sheep.
123backinyerface 2 years ago 7
@123backinyerface that comment reminds me of Pet by A Perfect Circle
shittybullshit 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
People who join the United States military chose to do so full knowing the risk that there is by joining. It is bad that they had to die, but we can not blame the President for trying to help.
gooseman1337 2 years ago
Gooseman,
How did Bush try to help?
He told us we had to invade Iraq because Saddam had ties to Al Qaeda. This was a lie.
He told us he had biological weapons. This was a lie.
He told us he had chemicals weapons. This was a lie.
He told us he tried to buy uranium from Africa. This was a lie.
He told us he had aluminum tubes suitable for a nuclear weapons program. This was a lie.
Did the soldiers agree to die even if Bush was lying?
financialclips 2 years ago 18
Gooseman, don't get into with this guy. All his questions can be answered in the debate he and I had. Why be redundant. This guy clearley has Bush derangement.
ed2kou1 2 years ago
Simple minded "folk" tend to ignore the facts in favor of the status quo. But the overwhelming evidence to prosecute GW Bush as a murderer has been here for a long time. Just after a year in office it became clear that him and a group of cronies were duping the public and conspiring against the world. He is subject to full prosecution for 911 and Iraq. I didnt condone Hussein. But his death is a result of an unjust invasion. There are no rights as a result of the war. Built on blood is bad.
highnote606 2 years ago
@financialclips He also had at these murders a trumped front to terrorize&destroy US citizens lives by being the first to sign the patriot act. For our protection? Believe me Bush-child hating pedifiler wasn't out to help the US or he would've gave a damn when I sought him to get me out of hell hole corrupted Michigan. MI government causing child endangerment, stealing big financially from me, of course not abiding in laws against abuse & discrimination of kids,& thugstrying to put me in jail
RobinSpence100 11 months ago
@financialclips
We knew it then what we know now but what did Americans do about it?
Sit on their fat asses and eat like pigs?
RedRockification 6 months ago
@financialclips there actually a book out from a former soldier or something that actually proved that saddam or osama actually did have some chemical weapons after all but it was never allowed to surface to the media back here
philly24488 1 month ago
Very true
ed2kou1 2 years ago 4
ed2kou1,
I'm not aware that you answered any of my questions.
I've tried to keep it civil and only talk about the facts, but you have resorted to name-calling.
I will continue to try and keep it civil and avoid name-calling.
What military experts believe Saddam shipped Weapons of Mass Destruction to Syria?
Please post the names of all the military experts who believed this.
I am not aware of anyone who believes this.
Who said invading Iraq prompted 9/11? That's not what I said.
financialclips 2 years ago 2
You are right, he hates Bush and no matter what I say it will not change his point of view.
gooseman1337 2 years ago
Yeah the debate is clearley laid out. He suffers from Bush derangement.
ed2kou1 2 years ago
@gooseman1337 Are you out of your mind? Bush lie over and over and MUST be brought to bar.
bobbyles 1 year ago
@gooseman1337 Trying to help? Bush and criminals involved in government are the only terrorists traitors destroying our citizens lives!
RobinSpence100 11 months ago
@gooseman1337 How in the hell was bush trying to help? He created it!
wonkasin 7 months ago
Give it up W is gone. Let him be, god bless W thanks for keeping us safe.
ed2kou1 2 years ago
ed2kou1,
If Nazi war criminals are found 65 years after they committed their crime, should they still be prosecuted?
If someone convinced others to drop a bomb on your church killing thousands of your friends by telling others that terrorists were using the church to plan an attack, but it turned out to lie, but they were not caught for 10 years, should they be prosecuted?
financialclips 2 years ago
ed2kou1,
If someone convinced others to blow up your child's school by telling them that it was really a weapons factory, killing your children and thousands more, but it turned out to be a lie, and the person was not caught for 20 years, would you still want them prosecuted or would you say, "Well, that happened a long time ago. Let's just forget about it."?
The purpose of prosecution is to deter others from doing the same thing in the future.
Everything we were told about Iraq was a lie.
financialclips 2 years ago
Everything we were told about Iraq was a lie. BS EVERYONE KNOWS SADDAM HAD WMD'S. HELL HE USED THEM ON HIS OWN PEOPLE. MONDAY MORNING QUARTERBACKING IS GOOD FOR YOU AND I. IT'S NOT SO GOOD WHEN YOUR THE PRESIDENT. THANK GOD FOR W! THX FOR KEEPING US SAFE
ed2kou1 2 years ago
ed2kou1,
Saddam did not have Weapons of Mass Destruction.
They found no biological weapons, no chemical weapons, no nuclear weapons or nuclear weapons program.
Robert Scheer of the Los Angeles Times wrote repeatedly about Bush's lies before Bush invaded Iraq.
When you say "everybody knew...", this is simply not true.
Anyone who took the time to look into it, knew it was all a lie.
Invading Iraq based on lies and killing hundreds of thousands of people fanned the flames of terrorism.
financialclips 2 years ago
Saddam did not have Weapons of Mass Destruction. Yes he did, we know he used them on the Kurds. Military experts believe he shipped them to Syria. For arguments sake, let's say he didn't, if something would've happened say Arizona got nuked and it got traced back to Iraq. You'd be the 1st one in line calling for W impeachment saying he received a memo and did nothing. You can't have it both ways. Yeah invading Iraq propted 9-11. Oh that's right 9-11 happened before we invaded Iraq. SIMPLETON
ed2kou1 2 years ago
The stuff Saddam used on the Kurds were not WMD's. First of all the US gave him that stuff. Second it took many units of that poison to take out a full city block. The WMD's Bush said he had were a thousand times more powerful where one hit could cover tens of city blocks. Bush also claimed he had UAV's and almost nuclear weapons. Saddam never had any them. Even your hero Bush the chickenhawk had to fess up to that. It's sad you claim there were even after Bush admitted there never were any!
ciccone39 2 years ago
It amazes me how all you Bush ass-lickers can only say Bush kept us safe. Unfortunately that's all you can say. Never do any of you give one detail other than Bush kept us safe. Give me one detail. However it can't be a lie, a lie/failure of a war, something illegal or a violation of the Constitution. Saddam didn't have WMD's! Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld all admitted there were no WMD's! Stop being in denial and nothing more than a stubborn partisan.
ciccone39 2 years ago
You call me partisan lol.
Wkept us safe, we're we attacked again after 9-11.
He didn't violate the constitution.
Saddam did have WMD's, he used them on the Kurds.
All your heroes thought Saddm had WMD'S.
Kennedy, Gore, Clinton, Clinton, Kerry.
I'm sure I'm leaving some out.
So yeah there you go!
NOW QUIT BEING A W HATER! You do realize, you say the same talking points as AL QUEDA
ed2kou1 2 years ago
Once again you can't give me one detail. He called our Constitution a god damned piece of paper. Ever heard of the fourth amendment? Illegal search and seizure? Bush allowed for illegal warrantless wiretapping. Violation right there! You assume just because i don't like W I'm a dem/lib. I'm neither. I hate em all. Al Qaeda? AQ is the CIA Arab legion. It was created by Robert Gates. Saddam Never had WMD's. If intelligence showed he did, It would of should him moving them to Syria.
ciccone39 2 years ago
Show me where he said that, regarding the constitution. Illegal serch and seizure when?
Wartless wiretapping, if you're talking to terrorists.
Al Queda, was formed in the early 80's. Muja midide.
Saddam used WMD'S on his own people.
THX W FOR KEEPING US SAFE
ed2kou1 2 years ago
January 2005 i the Oval Office. Just search for it and you'll find it. All your phone calls, my calls are recorded and stored. Don't you remember the immunity Bush gave the telecommunication companies to do so? Saddam used poison. Poison weapons. Not weapons that cause destruction, massive damage. It took many many hits of that stuff to take out one city block. The weapons Bush said Saddam had could take out tens of blocks with one hit.
ciccone39 2 years ago
ed2kou1,
3,000 people were killed on 9/11 while Bush was President, one month after he received a memo titled "Bin Laden determined to attack inside the U.S.", but Bush did nothing.
How did Bush keep us safe?
Since Bush invaded Iraq, 4,000 American soldiers have been killed and 30,000 are permanently disabled.
How did Bush keep us safe?
And hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have been killed. For what?
financialclips 2 years ago
he received a memo titled "Bin Laden determined to attack inside the U.S.", but Bush did nothing. He also received a memo from the British intelligence saying Saddam was getting yellow cake and selling it to Al Queda. W DID SOMETHING. THX W FOR KEEPING US SAFE!
ed2kou1 2 years ago
ed2kou1,
The letter was a fake.
The letter was supposedly signed by people in the Nigerian government, however they had left their positions several years earlier.
The letter was such an obvious fake, an Italian tabloid refused to print the letter.
Do you believe that an Italian tabloid was smart enough to figure out it was a fake, but U.S. Intelligence was not?
I will post a video clip where Joe Wilson talks about the fake letter.
Bush killed hundreds of thousands of people based on lies.
financialclips 2 years ago
ed2kou1,
What if the situation were reversed?
What if Saddam had invaded the U.S. based on the same lies that Bush told us about Iraq, and killed hundreds of thousands or millions of Americans, should he be prosecuted for war crimes or would you say, "Oh well, he thought he was doing the right thing. Let's just forget about it and move on."?
If they don't prosecute Bush, then this allows every other leader in the world to invade other countries based on lies that "Well, we feel threatened".
financialclips 2 years ago
Good to hear some progress is being made - there hasn't been much on this for a while.
Toxie207 2 years ago
If Bugliosi is wrong, let someone come forward and prove him wrong by writing a book DEFENDING Bush. Every defendent in a courtroom has a right to a defense attorney. Bush would be no exception to that rule. Even Mr. Bugliosi would acknowledge that.
Linguist1967 2 years ago 2
I would have liked to have heard Bugliosi's response to the lady's question at the end of the segment where she asks him if he's been on Bill Maher's show. Why hasn't he had him on?
DMenase24 2 years ago