Ovchinnikov sent off (Russia v Portugal - Euro 2004)

[TheManiacDen]

definitely no handball. foot, then stomach and finally he touches ground by his glove.

[Tryndets]

Hauge is blind as a beetle.

[nuttkasekillah]

небыло руки

[paolo85montero]

@MeMrecious stay in the subject plz... this is Euro 2004 Russia against Portugal.

I'm also a referee en they learned us to do not make decisions on presumptions.

In this case, Referee Terje Hauge did a decision on presumption because it was NO HANDBALL

[paolo85montero]

No handball, the ball is not touched by arm or hand.

Never take a decision on presumption Mr. Referee !

[Rocky030295]

Хауге пидарас, Хауге пидарас

[Forger88]

no handball

blind bots

u see everythin on 2:34 replay

[Tomasson2014]

nahhh ni la toca, pasa que expulsa al arquero porque en la primera impresion parece que la toca y como estaba afuera del área y era último hombre el arbitro interpreto eso, osea mano afuera del área y lo expulso pero igual en el minuto 2:42 se ve claramente q no hubo mano del arquero Ovchinnkov

[7SuperCRonaldo17]

there are many illusions in life, and there was one here. Then again, he may have handled, but he "handled" after he stripped Pauleta of the ball

[danielni21]

It's no hand on ball, but, his arm stops the ball going to Pauleta, so it's foul and because Pauleta wouls stay in position to score, it's red card. That's rules of football. nothing else

[cantanhede13b]

ovchinnickov good goalkeeper F.C.Porto dont forget you!

[MystiffDawn]

If 0:40 is not a hand on ball then what is ?

Good decision !!

[OlegTar]

No!!!

even if it was the hand, it was a mistake

But the hand was not!

[MystiffDawn]

Maybe he touched it with his nose.....

[OlegTar]

Nose belongs to the head

[vovik55]

where handball?

[MystiffDawn]

What do you call this at 0:41 ? HAND on BALL !

[paolo85montero]

there's no contact with hand, arm or even what... just the leg and after that, the special effect on the ball.

NO hands, but very difficult to observe that as referee. But do you remember the red card for Jens Lehmann in UCL final 2006? Hauge is no top referee.

[gazelleDOG]

hard to say but id say it shouldn't of been a red-card

[alexs1422]

This wasn't a handball, its clear to see, but if the referee did give the handball, he had to send him off, because he was preventing a clear goal scoring opportunity. Had to be done.

[MystiffDawn]

I should have beenn a  LUE card....

YES it was a handball....

But if yoiu are russian, then it was .... foot ball

ha ha ha ha

[STzenit]

no handball

[MystiffDawn]

You are Russian, of course.

I am NOT Portuguese and I see it was HAND ball.

[MystiffDawn]

Yes,  handball

[CarlosPRaposo97]

@STzenit yes it was. check 0:35

[STzenit]

@CarlosPRaposo97

Seems everyone disagrees with you little kid.

[Mitkovich]

If Ricardo do that in the game, he probably won't get anything!

That was no handsball,and Portugal was favored by referee!

[NunzioFunaki]

yes.. I think the decision was right.. hard but right :)

[paolo85montero]

take a look at 2:45...

then you see clearly it was no handsball.

also on 0:40 you see it.

[MystiffDawn]

What's 2:37 then ? FOOT ? HEAD or.... HAND ?!