Added: 4 years ago
From: NsOakland6
Views: 4,319
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (75)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Good going ,you are a very smart lady.& the misinformation outlets & Rupert Murdoch & his cronies are going to make it impossible to beat mitt & i am from Massachusetts screw the finatical Mormon ?if he preached any other religion theyd call him on it..

  • I can understand what she is saying, it is just a shame and a tragedy that the powers that be are willing to do everything and anything to suppress the vote, our vote especially for Ron Paul. A vote is a vote is a vote period, weather its for Ron Paul or Santa Claus and it should be counted, period. We shouldn't have to resort to websites, check points and re check points, one person, one vote, and it should count!

  • ronpaulvotecount goes to a stupid japanese site and is registered to someone in tokyo since may 2010.

  • Hell yeah!

    It's not about democraps or republicants!

    love from Houston,tx!

  • ron paul got railroaded

  • AmeriKKKa

    Hated by the world

    Biggest problem in the world

    Israel's bitch

    Robber Baron paradise

  • I'm a Hillary supporter, but I AGREE with this idea for all voters. I'm watching Fraud happen all over the place in the Primaries on all sides of this election. We're ALL being duped. Paper Ballot & Computer Ballot Fraud keeps happening. This entire election is FALSE. So sad.

  • HILLARY IS A FRAUD

  • both are

  • the only way i can see to end voter fraud is to make the records public but have each persons privacy be protected with a password

    this way after you have voted you could go to a website and confirm your vote has been counted. no fraud possible every vote recorded and tracked like a ups package :)

  • it is easy to create a system that will confirm you voted but not actually add your vote to the total. The only way is to be able to see every one else's vote and your own so every one can verify the vote count manually.

  • it is essential that we have our votes remain secret. dont want bosses bullying their employees to vote a certain way or any other abuses you could imagine with them not being secret.idealy the system would be transparent and unmanipulatable a software analysis of the program after the election could confirm no tampering. we could make all votes in system only a code number and assighn each person a codeto accesess the votes in the system .but i see problems of ballot stuffing like that

    but

  • 1:21, she said"physical pieces of paper that will be collected by the priest" then changed it to precinct teams!LOL

    i think phrase priest was right, it seems that the U.S. in need of it's last rites, as the voting system you have seems (whether it be register with a party first or "electronic"???!!!!) to be already settled long before the average citizen has put pen to paper,in the U.K, we make OUR minds up ourselves! Good luck and i hope you get someone worthy of your trust in democracy.

  • I agree with your concerns about the voting problems here in the U.S.  However, having made up your minds in the U.K. to continually vote for socialist politicians and policies that strip away your freedoms and increase the power of your government -- I wouldn't be shouting that from the rooftops if I were you. Cheers! :)

  • I am writing an affidavit.

  • In California me and my neighbor voted close to noon and received voter receipt number 00001 and 00002. Not even one McCain sign seen anywhere ever. Only republicans to were seen out voting were Ron Paul ones who were proud to let everyone they had voted Ron Paul. We went early to the polls and RP votes were still pouring. Giuliani was out & Voxeo, company that reports #s through a cell phone GOP programmed script forgot 2 take him out. This electronically reports "results" to the news.

  • ok I can prove the fraud this time, again. What do you think the odds of Ron Paul comming in 5th place in every single one of Florida's 67 counties? F****** Impossible!

  • Yea there is a guy that posts videos on here that is from florida and he just put a new video up saying how could this happen. He said there is Ron Paul signs ALL OVER THE PLACE and a lot of RP voters in his part of florida at least.

  • @NsOakland6

    Ron Paul has just won the second consecutive CPAC straw poll by a large margin. It may have been too little too late last time, but he's really making a splash and people are waking up. I hope he runs again now that the message is out there!!

    Unfortunately, the mainstream media is still doing everything they can to dismiss him as "unelectable" or just not give him any airtime at all. Some republicans want to exclude him from the next debate, just ridiculous. We shall see :)

  • There are 13 polling stations left, and about 9600 abcesty ballots that have not come in, the total is right now 62060

  • Is there a way to find out how many absenty ballots there are?

  • not sure.

  • 11:17

  • 62217

  • well i am not going to be right, but because there was so many central machines, once i print out the totals for the counties we will see how it compares. Total voters to votes. No wonder they get away with it in florida, you would have to have someone calculating every machine to catch the fraud, and there is no way they will let that happen

  • I think its going to be less than that number, I say betweet 65,000 and 69,000. this one they have perfected with more than one central machine, it keeps you from getting a accurate figure

  • they have way to many central stations to get results early, NH only had one central station

  • 613 stations left to come in total sations 6913

  • Its 945 florida vote will be aprox 69,130 total

  • Ok lets see if ur right lol.

  • still no finished results

  • my feeling it was done by percentage vs votes per station, but we will see, dont forget there are still absentee ballots to come in

  • well thats ok, I have already contacted a few others, more than my percentage being right, what will cause the alarm is the 7 votes he lost, I have wrtten that part down because i knew ther would be no proof, but that is in here too. BUSTED thats all i got to say.

  • if I am right and it was esimated at 7 votes per station he will end up with 15813 votes

  • do you have any way to save these messages, or will they give you an exact time

  • No i have no way to save them other then use a video camera to record them on the screen like i said.Ech comment already says how many hours/days ago they were made and there is a date on this page in the top right corner that says when it was posted so that should be enough.

  • I have reported this as fraud, the problem with that is I forgot to right it down in the begining, i did start but not untill I saw that there was possible fraud. Lets not forget my calculation was done to prove myself wrong, not to show the fraud, unfortunely it showed the fraud

  • there are only ten more polling stations to come in

  • total # of votes was 15773 with 2186 reporting, the new number is 2249 stations reporting and still the same number of votes now there is no way he did not get one single vote. Immpossible!!!!!

  • ok here is more proof 65 polling stations just came in and ron Paul did not get one single vote.

  • Dont forget there is always the possibilty I am wrong, I just dont see how i could have predicted the outcome without knowing how many people would vote

  • What was the total number of votes for Ron Paul the last you saw? I can't find the numbers for him anywhere.

  • If there was no fraud i would have not been able predict that ron paul would get 5.3% of the actual vote per state + or - vairable of votes per station, which at this time stands at 3/4 of a % of the vote , regardless of how many voters.

  • For anyone reading this I did my calculation to prove to myself that there was no fraud, sadly to say I have been disapointed. I should have not been able to calculate this if there was no fraud.

  • So lets see, last night we had votes being counted backward, and 75 polling stations are still missing, hmmmmmm I smell a rat, of course I never smelled a rat so can someone tell me what they smell like, lol

  • Well 75 voteing stations are still missing this morning I wonder what happened to all them votes

  • man i got back way to late i had to just go to sleep. So what happened now u say? they never finished the total count in SC?

  • EVote machines violate the California constitution.

  • it's 12:21 Am here and 114 polling stations to come in yet 2145/15,570

  • Are you guys going to be the affidivitt there?

  • I am freezing my a** off in MN

  • Lakeport california. we are kicking butt up here

  • started a Ron Paul meetup group, it went from 10 people to 15, to 35 people in three weeks, we are making a difference.

  • Here is something that is seriously screwed up

    The stats for nevada:

    out of 1797 polls ron Paul got 3.3 votes per station, there is no way in hell, unless romney paid a bush of his goofy friends to poll like he did in florida

  • wow, keep posting and updaating on here. i have to leave for a while but i will be right back on when i get back.

  • now it says 2104/ 15234 votes I think i will call cspan

  • the last count is 2104 with 15228 votes where did he lose 7 votes?

  • Here is something weird according to cspan 1 with 2189 polling stations in the count was 15130, next they reported 2104 with 15235 votes hmmmmm? and now he just lost 7 votes

  • so all they have to do is fix the central machine that counts they dont have to do the other one which makes it easier to hide

  • Ah yes i forgot they also link voting machines (or the pc cards from the machines) into the Central machines to get the total count. I forgot about that.

  • all results are counted on one central machine

  • your ? about throwing off the votes might actualy be right, but, based on the number of people voting, the % of 5.3 will still be the same regaurdless of how many people vote because the votes all get counted at a central machine which would ensure the 5.3 percent regardless of the number of votes

  • So they are using paper ballots over there and central tabulation machines? But is there 1 tabulation machine for the state, a room of tabulation machineS, or 1 for every county? The ratios can still be different in each machine but I see what your saying also.

  • no paper ballots, only central machine

  • It was my understanding that "Central" Machines counted Paper ballots in private. Are you talking about the regular voting machines? Right as I am typing I just remembered that I did see a video about SC's voting machines. They said they have all machines with no Paper trail at all. And SC's was prohibit Votes to be counted in private. It was proven that since you can not SEE the votes being counted in the machine that it is Illegal. The video is on youtube somewhere.

  • I mean "SC's LAWs Prohibit votes to be counted in private i mean" sorry.

  • The number is getting real close to what you have predicted. currently 15,130 votes for RP at 97% of the votes in.

  • heres more proof 28 stations just reported and out of 28 stations ron paul only got 30 votes total, ya right

  • The only way this thing is not rigged is for example if one station had 500 and one had say 200, but with that you would see more than a 3/4 % change.

  • Ron took second in Nevada, they must not have DIBOLT!! LOL LOL LOL

  • No that was a caucus, hand counted, you are right.

  • As I am watching the SC poll results it may appear that these are rigged. If my calculations are correct and they are rigged ron paul will get just under 12,000 vote, and average 5.3% cross your fingers

  • Interesting... You have calculated the ratio(?) of votes that the gaffe is creating for each candidate? (I'm not a math genius by far so excuse me if i used the wrong terminology)

  • yes the # of stations divided by number of votes if the system were rigged, if not my stat will be way off

  • Ok new calculation, The avaerage is 6.5 people per polling station which will raise the caclulation to roughly 14,7000 votes total

  • very good idea! I was thinking about this i think while watch the NH primary CNN ticker result as the night went on. But here is one thing, if they have put even 2 or 3 different versions of the gaffe(virus) that have different ratios for flipping the votes, wouldnt that throw your calculations off? Hopefully there were dumb enough to put the same version of the virus in every machine.

  • yes there are that stupid, anything more would look too suspicious, but you are right, but if they did not do every machine the % of the with the viris would give a higher % than the ones with out which would still average

    just as if they done all of them

  • what I find extremely suspicious is no matter how many polling stations report, the average never changes more than 3/4 of a percent. this is completely unrealistic, because some stations cannot report the same, this is immpossible!!!!!!!

  • This is a step in the right direction, but a fraudster could still rig the election and not touch Ron Paul's vote totals. Just take some votes from a candidate who tallied much lower (or much higher) than Ron Paul and give those votes to another candidate who is neck and neck with Ron Paul. This way a fraudster could easily knock Dr. Paul a few places back without touching his totals.

  • but, it is a step in the right direction.

  • true, but with the affitts for example, the reporting polling station 12,13,14 that reported in the race reported 0 votes now if they did get affidavitts that will show fraud if there was votes there. cool huh

  • but then why would he have lost seven votes

  • DAMN! You should organized all the data you are collecting and make a video showing it. Tape the comments of the convo we have had showing the time the comments were made and show the date this video was posted. Your calculation was pretty much right on the mark unless 2000 votes just fall out of the sky or something.

  • Dr. Paul finished 2nd in Nevada! Despite little mainstream media coverage. L

    Let's spread the word.

  • Ronny is doing really well in Nevada!

  • Thank you for posting this...

  • No problem. It is a repost from the original poster.

  • This is a good idea, but I wonder if we could get enough declarations to catch fraud.

    I'm a California lawyer. We don't think we need notarized affidavits in this state. Maybe the election code requires it, but normally a declaration signed under penalty of perjury has the same effect.

  • How we can continue to break record after record... Just like Ron Paul says, "Let the market work. Get out of the way." We need to empower OURSELVES and I know how we can do that.

  • Good idea!

    Hi from Chicagoland and another Ron Paul supporter.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more