Armistice Day - A Call for a Global Day of Anonymous Silence - 14 March 2009

[AnonWithin]

It's time to an hero, seperate the men from the boys....and find out who is looking at the bigger, long term picture, instead of dwelling on what "Theme" will be represented at protest where Anon's are getting arrested at a fairly regular rate. Graham Berry cannot represent each and every ANON on his own as the COS finds reasons to bust your azzes (right or wrong), and let's face it, anyone know the going cost for a criminal attorney these days to retain a "Decent" one? 7K. Think about it.

[AnonWithin]

It's been my experience that there are MANY "Foot Soldier" Anon's who are BEGGING for an open forum and/or open dialogue since the beginning. It's also my estimation that a small percentage of Foot Soldier Anon's are just there to complain about the "tech" and for the party. I think the key to this is spreading the word in a big way that the time has come for BOTH SIDES to step up before utter destruction PERIOD

[AnonWithin]

Ack! I hope I didn't break any forum rules. I did read them a few days back...but I just thought of the fact I may have commented in a disrespectful way as to the forum rules. If so, please know it was unintentional and my message was for EDUCATIONAL purposes to fellow ANON's AND the COS!

[SkepticalMSW]

We're gratified that you are among the VERY few who actually bothered to do their homework before venturing to speak.

Few do these days online. We are attempting to change that for the Internet has indeed more often than once proven to be a lethal weapon. Used properly, it is perhaps the most relevant invention in our lifetimes as academics.

.

[SkepticalMSW]

It was expected that a culture(s) would emerge from this new technology, it was not anticipated that rather than all recognizing the value would result in children and antisocial personalities trying to kill each other and everyone else with what can also be used as a weapon

[SkepticalMSW]

The YouTube user ClingingMars is hereby banned from futher participation in this dialog for violations of the TOS and editoral policy clearly stated on our homepage. We will make a video tommorrow of his attempt to troll us, and present our leveled and measured responses which are couched in the apparently highly addictive to the very weak minded jagon that is both /b/, "Anonymous," and WWP.

Anybody else desire a b&hammer where we make the rules and play Chigao style?

[ChristianlySkeptical]

Predictably there has been no response from the moderators of Why We Protest. Users however have ranged in response from harassment of our number at our repeater site, to a DEATH THREAT from WWP user "KingNerd" aka "KingNerd888" on Youtube.

These are EXEMPLAR ANONYMOUS. These are the sort of people with such hypocrisy embedded in their own self-importance that they completely miss the fact that on multiple levels and in many ways, THEY THEMSELVES ARE THE EQUIVALENT OF SCIENTOLOGISTS.

[hartman5555]

I see no hate speech generated by anonymous. Randomly ask a picketer at any protest why they are there protesting.

[SkepticalMSW]

Investigate Thunderdome. Investigate stigmatization of user "TheBitch" for choosing to take back from you that which you were so graciously given but had not the sense to take and STFU about.

The thread is about the upcoming planned and highly distasteful protests intending to occur globally on the symbolic leader of their organization.

What has been given can be taken back, or the consequence will be exposing the fundamental hypocrisy that is Why We Protest as the "face" of the movement.

[SkepticalMSW]

The nonsense stigmatization of a person whom you people have not the faintest actual identity; a professional social worker who may OR MAY NOT have connections with our project...

THE DROPPING OF DOCUMENTS ON THE WHY WE PROTEST WEBSITE IN A BLATANT ATTEMPT TO FORCE USERS INTO SILENCE WITH INTENTIONAL AND DESTRUCTIVE TO CAUSE ACTIONS WILL CEASE...

You've been warned. Get over yourselves.

[SkepticalMSW]

User hartman5555 (6 minutes ago) said,

Your loosin it man.

The original comment has been deleted from its invalid context and contextualized for the viewer in the "seekrit treehous" language of "Anonymous."

[hartman5555]

You have no free speech, you are screening posts.

[SkepticalMSW]

We have been particularly clear in our channel regarding the ultimate end of posts which fail to offer evidence in refutation or support of statements in 500 letters or less.

As with any peer reviewed professional level journal to which on might submit, THIS forum has specific guidelines for submission of comments AND THEY WILL BE ENFORCED.

This as with all our demands, which we will outline tommorrow should our access fail to be restored, will be outlined in an upcoming video.

[hartman5555]

Your loosin it man.

[SkepticalMSW]

Comment deleted for FAIL