Iv'e had a LR disco & a RR sport and a cayenne turbo. I've taken them all off road and they perform equally as good, cayenne & RR sport were fantastic in deep snow with road tyres
Ive had a LR disco & a RR sport and a cayenne turbo. I've taken them all off road and they perform equally as good, cayenne & RR sport were fantastic in deep snow with road tyres
I bet driving that thing around the ring was a real butthole clencher. I imagine it'd be better for the land rover to do it in the wet, it will at least slide then, it's so high centered it seems like it would tip with any grippy lateral G's at all.
@Romandiesel It's only good at rallying. Try going offroad not damaging the body kit. There'll be loads of problems trying to get over a trunk or up the slope slowly.. :D BUT ITS GOOD! FASTEST SUV in the world! I prefer RangeRover cos of it's look though. :)
@TheVtieg6 no what i mean that with better driver who have experience of this track as he or she know his \ her hand like Sabine she could managed to do that in much less time
"you bet" doesn't mean very much. How about you link me to a video that shows.
I am not claiming the S/C Sport is faster, but you are making an uninformed guess there. Land Rover have put a video up of their time, how about Porsche and BMW do the same!
@lowlifehippie Yea the Sport Supercharged is .3 seconds slower 0-60 than the Turbo S but lets not forget that it's close to $60,000 cheaper than the Sport fully loaded... and where I live barely anyone has Range Rovers, and everyone have Cayennes!
@lowlifehippie Reports are the Cayenne did it in 8.34. However the Range Rover test was not with a racing driver, so I guess the speeds are comparable. I would still take a Range Rover over the Porsche Cayenne any day even if the RR's fastest time stood at 8.55.
@lowlifehippie Yup, might as well compare it to sports cars if you're going to mention the X5M or Cayenne Turbo - the same approach to technology aimed at on-road performance is also paid to off-road performance, something which is TOTALLY unmatched on any other vehicle in production, and certainly so if you're talking about on-road performance as well. Watch this video, then google 2011 range rover sport rock crawling - it's a spectacular feat of engineering.
The sport feels tighter and more reactive like a car, while the normal Range Rover feels smoother and built for comfort. It all depends on what you prefer.
@Bosnian808 as you track has limits of itself,even 500 hp wouldnt matter if its a sharp turn,physic laws applies to all car,Rangie can go faster on a straight line but limited to fast turns and sharp corners.
@Bosnian808 I think the supercharged(normal) is better. IF you're using it more for offroad and travelling. The "normal" RR is also much more expensive. :(
Would look much better from a rear mounted camera in the interior to give viewer the drives prospective as he approaches turns and does a better job of showing speed and forces to the viewer.
This has been flagged as spam show
Iv'e had a LR disco & a RR sport and a cayenne turbo. I've taken them all off road and they perform equally as good, cayenne & RR sport were fantastic in deep snow with road tyres
lxb180 8 months ago
Ive had a LR disco & a RR sport and a cayenne turbo. I've taken them all off road and they perform equally as good, cayenne & RR sport were fantastic in deep snow with road tyres
lxb180 8 months ago
I bet driving that thing around the ring was a real butthole clencher. I imagine it'd be better for the land rover to do it in the wet, it will at least slide then, it's so high centered it seems like it would tip with any grippy lateral G's at all.
K31TH3R 1 year ago
@Romandiesel It's only good at rallying. Try going offroad not damaging the body kit. There'll be loads of problems trying to get over a trunk or up the slope slowly.. :D BUT ITS GOOD! FASTEST SUV in the world! I prefer RangeRover cos of it's look though. :)
patrick5158 1 year ago
try a ferrari you will be done in 3 minutes
redbull9679 1 year ago
@redbull9679 it takes a Ferrari Enzo and the ferrari 599xx about 6 minutes to go around the Nurburgring fastest laps ever recorded on the track
dddddddgggggggggg 1 year ago
Why are you driving a 4wd on a race track?
Memphis35 1 year ago
@Memphis35 Just to show that it is also fast! and or the heck of it:)
bradley081 2 weeks ago
@Romandiesel i have not seen a cayenne leave a gravel road yet im guessing they may be good for rallying but nothing else
spliffthedog 1 year ago
a little slower please
Darkpoli318 1 year ago
A Ford Transit van can do it in 10:08 :-)
Press the pedal harder....
stagsimon 2 years ago
yeah but thats sabine
whotswrall 2 years ago
so maybe Land rover needs to put Sabine in the hot seat ;-)
stagsimon 2 years ago
....and do the lap on a dry track
Timberpants 2 years ago
@stagsimon
exactly Sabine manage to do about 10 minutes in Ford Transit Van so 9 minutes for 500 hp rage rover is nothing
mallah656 2 years ago
@mallah656
Your acting like 1 minute around the track is nothing
TheVtieg6 2 years ago
@TheVtieg6 no what i mean that with better driver who have experience of this track as he or she know his \ her hand like Sabine she could managed to do that in much less time
mallah656 2 years ago
how fast does the cayenne turbo s goes around the ring? i bet faster
and X5 M? once again i bet faster
still i d go for the range rover, range rover is not about going fast
lowlifehippie 2 years ago 4
"you bet" doesn't mean very much. How about you link me to a video that shows.
I am not claiming the S/C Sport is faster, but you are making an uninformed guess there. Land Rover have put a video up of their time, how about Porsche and BMW do the same!
lilbeefer 2 years ago
@lowlifehippie Yea the Sport Supercharged is .3 seconds slower 0-60 than the Turbo S but lets not forget that it's close to $60,000 cheaper than the Sport fully loaded... and where I live barely anyone has Range Rovers, and everyone have Cayennes!
TheeFuhrer 2 years ago
but can a cayenne go off-road i think that would be a no
spliffthedog 1 year ago
Yea, exactly.
TheeFuhrer 1 year ago
@lowlifehippie Reports are the Cayenne did it in 8.34. However the Range Rover test was not with a racing driver, so I guess the speeds are comparable. I would still take a Range Rover over the Porsche Cayenne any day even if the RR's fastest time stood at 8.55.
meowmmmmm 1 year ago
@lowlifehippie Yup, might as well compare it to sports cars if you're going to mention the X5M or Cayenne Turbo - the same approach to technology aimed at on-road performance is also paid to off-road performance, something which is TOTALLY unmatched on any other vehicle in production, and certainly so if you're talking about on-road performance as well. Watch this video, then google 2011 range rover sport rock crawling - it's a spectacular feat of engineering.
EstorilEm 1 month ago
You think sport or nofrmal is better? Im going to hunters on monday in guildford.
Bosnian808 2 years ago
They are both VERY different. I suggest you drive both and then you decide.
Timberpants 2 years ago
How do they vary?
Bosnian808 2 years ago
The sport feels tighter and more reactive like a car, while the normal Range Rover feels smoother and built for comfort. It all depends on what you prefer.
deanP382 2 years ago
@Bosnian808 as you track has limits of itself,even 500 hp wouldnt matter if its a sharp turn,physic laws applies to all car,Rangie can go faster on a straight line but limited to fast turns and sharp corners.
cemmas 2 years ago
@Bosnian808 I think the supercharged(normal) is better. IF you're using it more for offroad and travelling. The "normal" RR is also much more expensive. :(
patrick5158 1 year ago
Would look much better from a rear mounted camera in the interior to give viewer the drives prospective as he approaches turns and does a better job of showing speed and forces to the viewer.
rayamanelly 2 years ago
theres a video of a tdv8 range rover sport doing 9:30
0thingthing0 2 years ago
top
luceblu12 2 years ago
See the above video response for an other take on the same drive around the Nurburgring.
Timberpants 2 years ago
Great car !!!!!!!!
'A'
ADProductionsLtd 2 years ago
looks fast
dddddddgggggggggg 2 years ago