Added: 4 years ago
From: TheYoungTurks
Views: 12,803
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (79)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • if this is true it might also effect his stance on gay marriage.

    it is always ironic when people who have cheated on their spouses or had a divorce say stuff like "gay marriage will destroy marriage".

  • 4. favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, esp. as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.

  • I mean what is wrong with a person being Liberal? I mean the dictionary gives comments like, "someone who believes the rights of individuals that EVERYONE should have." SO why do people say being a liberal as a bad thing.=o in fact every dictionary i looked at so far and even online say the same thing. SO why do people say being "Liberal" is bad?=o I wanna know=o Cause if it's wrong to want everyones rights protected and things to change for the better what is wrong with being a liberal?

  • here's another one=O

    6. of or pertaining to representational forms of government rather than aristocracies and monarchies.

    7. free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant: a liberal attitude toward foreigners.

    8. open-minded or tolerant, esp. free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.

    9. characterized by generosity and willingness to give in large amounts: a liberal donor.

  • Giving the dog a bone! Man, I keep reading more and more dirt about John and Sarah.

    Yes, it is relevant, Adriens Pawn. If John doesn't have the moral fiber (I love that term!) to stay faithful to his wife, then he doesn't have the moral fiber to do what's best for America.

    But that's not news. John McCain flip flops like a screen door in a tornado. He only cares about enriching himself and keeping the war going.

  • My god, the kind of society where people give a shit for the personal lives of others. Give it a rest already!

  • For all those sick of the right wing hypocrisy, life just got alot better! Larry Flynt is going to investigate John McCains multiple affairs.

    Since McCain insists on lying his ass off, I say GO Larry!!

    The so called "maverick" has a little explaining to do, especially since his campaign manager had to chase vicky iseman down in a train station and "beg" her not to see him anymore. With all of this, McCain still lied.

    Sorry John, you and your mistresses are going down!

  • John McCain definitely cheated on Cindy with this Cindy McCain look alike Vicki Iseman (who's 20 year younger than Cindy).

    John McCain was obviously lying when he got caught just months ago. McCain should explain his "family values" to us....especially the part about calling your wife a CUNT.

    John McCain will make Bill Clinton look like a choir boy !

  • The group Vietnam Veterans Against McCain attacks Senator John McCain's heroism as a POW in the Vietnam conflict; this is making some waves in the news due to McCain's presidential candidacy.

    The documentary "Missing, Presumed Dead the Search for America's POWs" however focuses more on Senator John McCain successfully blocking the release of classified POW/MIA documents.

    Here is an excerpt from that documentary. DVD of documentary may be purchased at MissingPresumedDead

  • John McCain is a "Real" hero alright, he was a pilot who bombed and killed innocent women and children in Vietnam -- a "Real" hero. And because he murdered human beings, his karma eventually caught up with him by becoming a prisoner of the war and being imprisoned. A true hero is one with no human blood on his hands.

  • if its a lie why not sue them and prove it?

  • Has there been any further news on this issue? Any further investigation? My guess is - no.

  • Reasons NOT to vote for this sheep in wolves clothing

    1) McCain Committed Treason

    2) Is unstable as a result of being tortured while a prisoner of war in North Vietnam

    3) Fathered Child With Black Prostitute.

    4) His had same sex intercourse.

    5) Wife is addicted to deals

  • Every thing is a lie all of this is fake john mcain is gay

  • There is a lot more evidence coming at you? What does this mean? Should everyone run for cover? This is news? It's all speculation with no proof. Rev. Jesse A. Wright's racial rants are proof of just how hateful he and Barack really are. Coming at you, young turks!

  • At least it was with an adult woman. That's more than you could say about most Republican sex scandals.

  • Get ready for another 9/11 if you won't support his stupid war with Iran.

  • Yeah, that's it, expose that crazy warmonger.

  • a nice SECONDE LADY,even better than the real thing {as the song goese}or is it that the two of them together wouldnt make ONE good woman,I will leave it to your own good judgement.

  • NY Times is pulling this out of their asses. With Bill CLinton, Gennifer Flowers came out with a claim. Clinton was caught w/Lewinski. Even Vicky Iseman denied this, gees did the NYTimes think they were ruining HER life? NAw... the Clintons have to get their way at all costs, and they'll stop at nothing. Vince Foster anyone?

    BTW, the geeky techies are responsible for the wonderful dot com economy. If you want that back, thank them.

  • I don't think democrats should bring up the word affair. Not when their president dropped his pants in the Oval Office.

  • haha these liberals try to knock mccain for macking with women

    conservatives get the women my friend not sneaky liberals sorry

  • vicky ise doesnt want to admit she had sex with mccain what self respecting woman would

  • Ok heres how it went. The women endorsed Mr. Mccain and he took her out for dinner because they were both in the same city at the time. Just because you democrats who are all made up of poors and aliens cant afford to take nice people out for a nice friendly dinner dosent mean you can trash someone for being polite.

  • Yea, fucking poors and aliens are ruining our countries. We gotta kick E.T. the fuck out. And them poors's terrorists, yea? Terrorists fucking insurgents supporting Obama cause he's gonna destroy good Christian America by reaching out to our enemies on the AXES of EVIL and they're gonna take away RICH PEOPLES MONEY cause they're JEALOUS that they can't take NICE PEOPLE out to DINNER. Yea, that makes sense.

  • go back to sleep you knuckle head,,, the big boom of a mccain's nuclear war will wake you up!!!!!!!!ZZZZZZzzzZZzzZZZZZzz­z straight talk my friend!!!;)

  • So Mac can score with the babes, where's the story?

  • Hold on, Turks...

    The New York Times endorsed his candidacy for the Republican nomination, not for President. There's an important distinction to draw here.

    There's no story here, guys. Drop it. Stick to the real issues at hand.

  • Your idiots when it comes to the Ron Paul videos but this one was pretty good.

  • you ron paul people still here? hahahahahaha

    wow, I thought it was gonna be such a big deal since so many internet nerds were going for him, but I guess he got kicked and left in the ditch. yes he would have been a good choice but he didn't get it just like I told all of you

  • Took Michele Obama off the front page with her "First time in my life I am proud of my country." Mission accomplished.

  • Notice by the comments that when ANY smell of scandal effects the GOP then it's all a smear job and people should back off..BUT..when it's about a Democrat they are all over it like stink on poop. Must be getting a little crowded on that "moral highground" so many people are living on right this minute.

  • We need to have a special prosecutor appointed and appropriate millions to see if he had sex with this women.

  • isn't that chris crocker? LEAVE JOHN MCAIN ALONE!!!

  • This McCain deal and the NY Times was an Obama Staff Smear. They are the ones that got this story re-lit. Obama feels that HE IS THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE. Obama feels that he needs to start discrediting and attacking McCain now. Don't believe. Wait a few weeks....

  • Really? If this was a smear whoever planned did a piss-poor job with the timing. An earlier releasea could've derailed McCain's pending nomination, and a later release would still be fresh in the mind of General Election voters. Instead (according to you) Obama did it at the least advantageous time possible. Hmm, yeah, I guess that makes a lot of sense.

  • you republicans really want this guy?? Bush Jr.... Four more years in Iraq??

  • yes they do. they'll take mccain anyday over a woman(hillary) or a black man(obama).

  • meanwhile democrats and the ny times have no problem with tedd chappaquiddick kennedy.

    i find it amusing how inane so many libs really are

  • libs insane? as opposed to racist, bigoted, fear-mongering, and hypocritical conservatives.

  • Right, because you never heard a peep about Monica Lewinsky out of the NY Times in the 90's. Come to think of it, it was IMPOSSIBLE to hear, watch or read about Lewinsky in the 90's. That f*ng Liberal Media(TM) buried the story, just like they buried the "I didn't inhale" story about Clinton. But Bush's cocaine use and DUI was all over the place!

  • Are you fucking kidding?!? The only story for 2 years was the Lewinsky thing. That was started as an investigation into white water and somehow it ended up being millions of dollars and over 2 years spent discussing a man's sex life. Bush on the other hand has started two illegal wars, trashed habeus corpus, exerted executive privilege to make a king blush, etc. and giggled about it the whole time while the media asks him softball questions and the Democrats give in on every fucking thing.

  • Encyclopeteia's comment was tongue-in-cheek.

    (So yes, he was fucking kidding.)

  • Why is Turkey invading the kurds in Iraq Cenk?

    /watch?v=IrXRsXivgTw

  • These are different scandals. With Clinton, there was hard evidence. There is none here, and besides - both parties deny it.

  • True, the harder evidence here is not about the love affair (relatively unimportant), but rather about the lobbyist deals and connections. Unfortunately that aspect of the story is being overshadowed by the affair part. At any rate, even if the evidence was better with Clinton WRT the affair, the point stands that if the media *was* "liberally biased" they wouldn't have aired the story 24/7 for years on end.

  • The only reason NY Times did'nt release this story sooner is because they new it would hurt Hillary whom they endorsed also. Because it would bring back the memories of Bill clinton and his love affair.

  • I hope you're being facetious.

  • Some neo-cons say this shouldn't be an issue.

    Of course when Clinton had an affair they acted like it was the ONLY ISSUE!

  • you are so right. conservatives seem to overlook their own scandals, or they attack the individuals who bring them to light.

  • What a bunch of useless hot air. There's always somebody imagining an affair at every workplace. Why would that be newsworthy here, being just a rumor with a pretty face to imply. . . hey he had to have one with her. It's just a useless attack for no reason. Who wants a bunch of blacks running the country, it would be like Detroit, MI. Who wants Clinton? I'm mad the Democrats cannot field a real honest decent replacement for Republicans who are disappointing but not as stupid.

  • that's what i'm talking about firecat. yours is the same attitude held by all consrvatives. at least you have the nerve to come out and say you don't want obama for president because he's black. and as for the affair not being newsworthy, i bet you didn't feel that way when the republicans launched that so called 'investigation' into bill clinton's extramarrital affair.

  • A bunch of Blacks running the country? LOL

    I think the adequate question is: "Who wants a bunch of Whites to continue to drag this country to the ground?"

  • Let's clean our oun laundry .

  • Of course conservatives aren't "concerned" about this. They don't want this to blowup into the same type Monicagate they caused.

  • This story should be a non- issue. War against the world forever..... now that's an issue.

  • Right on point..:)

  • this story is nothing. new york times is terrible.

  • and the conservatives aren't upset that mcccain might be guilty of the affair, they're upset because someone told on him.

  • Keep in mind that this is the same guy who recently said on youtube that the fact that the Malaysian Minister for Health admitted to a sexual relationship with his mistress was really no big deal.

  • The thought of John McCain lathering Vicki Iseman's lox and capers with his cream cheese disturbs me more than the statement I just typed.

    I guess that's why, in regards to women, I'm for John McCain. McCain would never settle for a Lewinsky. He trades up, not down.

  • interesting nyt held the story when endorsing McInsane

  • I hate political smear tactics, they are so juvenile...but hey considering McCain is pretty much a lock, if this keeps the gullible public from voting Republican I'm not going to bitch.

  • But Cenk makes a good point that as a smear tactic, the timing couldn't have been worse. McCain's biggest R threat (Romney) is already out and the general election is months away.

    But I could be wrong. We'll see how it plays out.

  • partisan punditry is so fun. until you're actually trying to get something done and it gets in the way

  • McCain is a scumbag.

    He TAUNTED Ron Paul when FOX "News" excluded Ron from the New Hampshire debate.

  • I wish this woman he cheated with would come forward and spill the beans. She's probably been paid off with hush money. Everyone put Bill Clinton through the wringer for the Monica Lewinsky scandal and wanted to impeach him. Why shouldn't a candidate that is not even president yet not be put through the very same speculation. He should be and I hope the truth all comes out.

  • oh here we go again.....puritanism run amok!!

  • i agree his affairs are no one's business, but he's a hypocrit if he did do it

  • That's true. If you're guilty of the accusation, then confess, the earlier the better, and let ppl move on. And you're right, personally I don't care about the affairs of politicians, what's important is can they lead the nation and its economy well?

  • was she lobbying or lappying? That is the question? Only time and good investigative reporting will tell. Either way, you have a FINE new topic for "Republican Sexcapades"!

  • That lobbyist wouldnt have to bribe senators with money to exert influence on them. She is pretty hot. And so is McCain's wife. Damn, why did these fine-looking women go for this old guy with PTSD, a body scarred from torture and a raging bout of Alzheimer's? Could it be because they ar hoes and figure they wont have to work too hard to earn their keep with the geezer, since the Vietnam vet can barely keep it up for more than a few seconds? McCain is one lucky SOB to be boning these MILF's.

  • Yeah, it turns out that he's just really good at lying. Every politician has to lie a little bit, and some are VERY good at it.

  • common, all politicians do it

    Bill Clinton

    Larry Craig the gay B*tch

    John McCain ....

    I mean common, anything that is going to help the democrats win the elction is fine by me

  • mccain can have sex? i thought he was too old for that...

  • whether or not the sex scandal is true or not, it will still effect him in a negative manner. so it sounds as if he's screwed.

  • Watch The Entire Show at theyoungturks (.) com

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more