Lord Shmuck prick bankrupted his own business( Amstrad) by not sampling and testing the chipboard for a new WP, before ordering a million from China that turned out to be shite.
Then got his big jew mate Murderhack to bail him out with a bent contract to make Sky sat dishes.
"The QUEEN has been pleased by Letters Patent under the Great Seal of the Realm dated 20 July 2009 to confer the dignity of a Barony of the United Kingdom for life upon Sir Alan Michael Sugar, Knight,
by the name, style and title of BARON SUGAR of Clapton in the London Borough of Hackney."
A sir is a Knight of the Realm. A Lord is a mere peer of the realm. A peerage is offered as a reward for political activities. Knighthoods are mostly awarded for success in the arts, business, academia, charity, politics etc. I'm against the honours system as it currently stands. When John Prescott can became a portly peer of the shires then something has been fucked up.
"The QUEEN has been pleased ...to confer the dignity of a Barony of the United Kingdom for life upon Sir Alan Michael Sugar, Knight, by the name, style and title of BARON SUGAR of Clapton in the London Borough of Hackney."
Barons are entitled to be adressed as such, by employees too.
Properly adressed as Lord Sugar by everybody else; his employees included, exept he says otherwise. He IS a Lord and done.
@KeepEuropeWhite He has every right. Its a huge achievement for anyone to achieve and if one cannot feel good for coming from where he was as a child to where he is now then thats just stupid.
Hey, while you guys are arguing over this guy, do you think you can pause your bickering to explain to me as an American just what in the hell the "House of Lords" DOES? Is it under threat to dissolve? Does it have any real power anymore? I'm just curious. Is it more of a "dog and pony" show nowadays?
Hey, while you guys are arguing over this guy, do you think you can pause your bickering to explain to me as an American just what in the hell the "House of Lords" DOES? Is it under threat to dissolve? Does it have any real power anymore? I'm just curious. Is it more of a "dog and pony" show nowadays?
@Rac665 The House of Lords, on paper, is a way of scrutinising the Government, but in the last decade or so, they do not block anything from the House of Commons because they feel they don't have the right to do so. They are not democratically voted in, but chosen by select people and few people in the UK feel they should have any power in law-making decisions. The idea of a US style democratically elected Supreme Court has come up, but I'm not sure if it's actually going ahead!
I was under the assumption that the Lords consists of professionals from various trades. Back in the day Ithe House of Lords were aristocrats from the upper class I thought. Since the upper class tend to be professionals in the modern world, I'm assuming that's what the Lords are now. My question is what exactly is wrong with an appointed House full of experts and respected professionals? Say If the Commons puts out policy dealing with medical issues, I would much rather (cont)
@Rac665: But you see the Aristocrats aren't allowed to vote for the commons so you'd have a more neutral upper chamber as the aristocrats would have little reason to be corupt due to already having required cash from their lands.
...have someone make policy on issues that they have worked in before. Who says a Career Politician should dictate issues of education, medicine etc. What would be the point of having a democratically appointed House of Lords? Wouldn't it be just another "Commons"? The UK seems to small to have something along the lines of our "Senate".
@StevenDeedle OK, let's just forget about the disgusting racist BNP policies for a moment. They have no plan for the economy, no plan for the NHS, no plan for anything other than kicking all black people out. Therefore, they are not a political party and shouldn't be allowed to stand for elections.
@L30TM They said, "Hear, hear," which is a term used in houses of Parliament to express agreement. Usually said after a comment is made, I would assume that in this context it is the traditional way of politely showing approval in the Lords. I'm open to correction here, but I think applause is (at least traditionally) not the done thing in the UK Houses of Parliament. Here in Ireand, as with most other places, applause is fine.
Ambitious used car salesman, admired by people who know nothing about life, and only really admire the accumulation of money. Used by Labour because he's one of the few successful business men who still looks like a dodgy working class geezer. Why does he still support Labour in his position? Tribal Labour man, really though, talks Labour, lives conservative.
@Johnno85 Clever response, Red John. I get used to the wisdom of the vacant so called left, you all seem to have the same vocabulary. Four legs good, two legs bad, it always ends up the same for all successful socialists - everyone's equal but some are more equal than others.
wtf is this twat doing as a Lord? So it seems both the Digital Bill and the enoblement of a knob was on the list of things to rush through before labour got kicked out. Anyone who has ever worked for this guy knows he is a money obsessed prick and cares for nobody!
@and551 because I worked for him at Amstrad 15 years ago designing his fax machines. He had no concern for the quality of the product or the consumers, he just focused on profit. Maybe he is suited to governement?
@1965CAPTKIRK Labour gets 400,000 donated to them by an honest business like Sugar. The rich Tory cunts get millions of pounds donated to them by a criminal named Lord Ashcroft. Therefore, you cannot take the moral higher ground here. Fuck off.
Sugar affirmed his allegiance rather than "taking the oath": there was no bible and no reference to God. Compare this video to your one of Michael Martin. It's an important distinction, particularly for those people who believe in the separation of the state and religion.
@jrawle Lord Sugar still 'took the oath'. He simply used the affirmation working instead of the religious version. Two important points: 1) The oath is to the Queen and not God. 2) I suspect Lord Sugar's decision to use the affirmation wording with no Bible and no reference to God is because Lord Sugar is Jewish. I doubt he gave any consideration to the so-called separation of church and state.
@Andy1982able The Oaths Act 1978 states that anyone is "permitted to make his solemn affirmation instead of taking an oath." So an affirmation is not an oath. The comment about religion was meant in general terms, not necessarily as Lord Sugar's motive for affirming. Historically, the oath was effectively a bar to certain people sitting in parliament, particularly Catholics and Jews. Google "the parliamentary oath" for an interesting paper on it.
@Andy1982able: The Church and the State are one in the UK. Of course if he wanted to swear the oath rather than give a affirmation he could have used a copy of the Old Testiment (as you can't touch a Torah)
to the contrary he has given many a speech and engaged in many a debate on the recession and how we will get out of it...its these type of people who should be in the Lords someone with a little nuance of business acumen
masonic rituals
Marco81blues 1 day ago
Lord Shmuck prick bankrupted his own business( Amstrad) by not sampling and testing the chipboard for a new WP, before ordering a million from China that turned out to be shite.
Then got his big jew mate Murderhack to bail him out with a bent contract to make Sky sat dishes.
What a businessman!
"IT AINT WHAT YOU KNOW ITS JEW YOU KNOW".
svecter 3 weeks ago
you can see how happy he is :)
gobildigookable 1 month ago
What a great man. Great stuff
greenbutterfly101 1 month ago
is this Trumpton?
TheWarmcube 1 month ago
yorwa faaackin disgrace! this establishment is a faaackin shaambows!
gunboatd1plomat 1 month ago
alan sugar = cunt
FatFriendly1 1 month ago
Sounds like Joey Tribbiani used his thesaurus to write the opening speech
jedi0305 1 month ago
Baron of Hackney. Sounds delightful...
stixflix06 1 month ago
Look at this mediEVIL bullshit, fuck me, we're almost in 2012, not 1802!
andyhibbert 1 month ago
am i the only waiting for some funny shit to happen
TheMarmite09 1 month ago 2
what did they say at the end as he shaked that womans hand?
skodabreath 2 months ago
it would be much more fun to watch if they were all on segways
GREMLlN 2 months ago
I would burst into laughter lol
florencelovme 3 months ago
What is that noise at 4:01 ?!
WILL2LIV3 3 months ago
That wig is absolutely ridiculous
Madfoot713 3 months ago
He was Sir Alan Sugar and hated being referred to as 'SAS'.
3Deity 4 months ago
Santa Sugar
TalonMercenary 4 months ago
He changed Sir Alan because people said S'rallen. Now Lord Sugar can become Lord Sugar-tits
MrWubbWubb 4 months ago
@KeepEuropeWhite
One that's an actual Lord?
Like Lord Sugar.
Nitronick 5 months ago
@Nitronick
actually Baron Sugar
"The QUEEN has been pleased by Letters Patent under the Great Seal of the Realm dated 20 July 2009 to confer the dignity of a Barony of the United Kingdom for life upon Sir Alan Michael Sugar, Knight,
by the name, style and title of BARON SUGAR of Clapton in the London Borough of Hackney."
rivenoak 5 months ago
@vroom2000 thanks
ahmir2500 5 months ago
why do they bow their heads
ahmir2500 6 months ago
lolllll this is some of the craziest shite iv seen in my lifee :P wtf is this place loll
turismo1992 6 months ago
"I solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will be faithful and bare true legions to her majesty the queen Elizabeth."
"HAHA!!! YOU'RE ALL FIRED!"
eggz01 6 months ago
I wonder if Voldemort had to go through this bullshit for his title as well.
Aldeni1551 6 months ago 16
PROPER
whotaughtyou 7 months ago
WHO HE
whotaughtyou 7 months ago
I'd rather be addressed as Sir rather than Lord... to be called a Lord must be excruciatingly embarrassing.
Hamilcar275 7 months ago
@Hamilcar275
really? lol Lord is higher then sir,
Lord is an awesome rank
xMandalorex 6 months ago
A sir is a Knight of the Realm. A Lord is a mere peer of the realm. A peerage is offered as a reward for political activities. Knighthoods are mostly awarded for success in the arts, business, academia, charity, politics etc. I'm against the honours system as it currently stands. When John Prescott can became a portly peer of the shires then something has been fucked up.
Hamilcar275 6 months ago
@KeepEuropeWhite "Who the fuck does he think he is ?"
"The QUEEN has been pleased ...to confer the dignity of a Barony of the United Kingdom for life upon Sir Alan Michael Sugar, Knight, by the name, style and title of BARON SUGAR of Clapton in the London Borough of Hackney."
Barons are entitled to be adressed as such, by employees too.
Properly adressed as Lord Sugar by everybody else; his employees included, exept he says otherwise. He IS a Lord and done.
rivenoak 7 months ago
Where are Lord Vader and Lord Voldemort?
HerrWagnerfreund 8 months ago
@HerrWagnerfreund
Lord Snape is real. ;)
rivenoak 7 months ago
@KeepEuropeWhite He has every right. Its a huge achievement for anyone to achieve and if one cannot feel good for coming from where he was as a child to where he is now then thats just stupid.
Themysticpriest 8 months ago
LOL wtf, just because his got money his become a lord?!
gujibabe28 8 months ago
baron sugar lol
dmax631 8 months ago
aaaahhh, this is awesome. we are witnessing the birth of the real Darth Vader
NorthWeezy2010 9 months ago 3
@KeepEuropeWhite derpp, thats his title derppppp de derrrr. its like you being a teacher and your students call you mr or mrs.
NorthWeezy2010 9 months ago
I thought he said "Hi !" when he first started speaking haha
GeorgeWLamb 9 months ago
@KeepEuropeWhite Like doctors and called doctors, Reverends are called Reverends
05marshalljw 10 months ago
Vile as ever, Should be called the house of horrors. House of theivery, House of betrayal, House of lies, House of filth and debauchery.
The house of bullshitery ! lol
sarah1ooo1 11 months ago
Comment removed
sarah1ooo1 11 months ago
Hope he wasn't bursting for a piss ....twaddle
thorplands9 11 months ago
MY God, I thought that was a joke on "Blackadder" about the "cat skin wind cheaters"!!!
castlecolten 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What a load of fucking shit!
01blackpete1 1 year ago
And the vulgarization of the Lords is complete!
borjon23 1 year ago
I can't respect Lord Alan Sugar enough, he deserves being titled.
NathanRGreenway 1 year ago
alans a slimy bastard ,all the products ever produced were shite
RICHARDTOMLEY10WHARF 1 year ago
@RICHARDTOMLEY10WHARF please dont be rude about my uncle please
hanghoodiescum 1 year ago
@hanghoodiescum i dont acknowledge him being a lord ,so i would adress him as alan ,he would have to wait for me
RICHARDTOMLEY10WHARF 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RICHARDTOMLEY10WHARF
Hey, while you guys are arguing over this guy, do you think you can pause your bickering to explain to me as an American just what in the hell the "House of Lords" DOES? Is it under threat to dissolve? Does it have any real power anymore? I'm just curious. Is it more of a "dog and pony" show nowadays?
Rac665 1 year ago
@hanghoodiescum
Hey, while you guys are arguing over this guy, do you think you can pause your bickering to explain to me as an American just what in the hell the "House of Lords" DOES? Is it under threat to dissolve? Does it have any real power anymore? I'm just curious. Is it more of a "dog and pony" show nowadays?
Rac665 1 year ago
@Rac665 The House of Lords, on paper, is a way of scrutinising the Government, but in the last decade or so, they do not block anything from the House of Commons because they feel they don't have the right to do so. They are not democratically voted in, but chosen by select people and few people in the UK feel they should have any power in law-making decisions. The idea of a US style democratically elected Supreme Court has come up, but I'm not sure if it's actually going ahead!
tonka998 1 year ago
@tonka998
I was under the assumption that the Lords consists of professionals from various trades. Back in the day Ithe House of Lords were aristocrats from the upper class I thought. Since the upper class tend to be professionals in the modern world, I'm assuming that's what the Lords are now. My question is what exactly is wrong with an appointed House full of experts and respected professionals? Say If the Commons puts out policy dealing with medical issues, I would much rather (cont)
Rac665 1 year ago
@Rac665: But you see the Aristocrats aren't allowed to vote for the commons so you'd have a more neutral upper chamber as the aristocrats would have little reason to be corupt due to already having required cash from their lands.
kanenkitten 11 months ago
@tonka998
...have someone make policy on issues that they have worked in before. Who says a Career Politician should dictate issues of education, medicine etc. What would be the point of having a democratically appointed House of Lords? Wouldn't it be just another "Commons"? The UK seems to small to have something along the lines of our "Senate".
Rac665 1 year ago
Good job Sir Allen has joined the House of Lords, what with him being an elected, professional politician!
Lorddoucheington 1 year ago
businessmen and politiicians should not mix end of....
1982labman 1 year ago
House of liars, vote bnp, it's britains only hope of winning the political war between indigeous brits and thousands of 3rd world immigrants.
StevenDeedle 1 year ago
@StevenDeedle OK, let's just forget about the disgusting racist BNP policies for a moment. They have no plan for the economy, no plan for the NHS, no plan for anything other than kicking all black people out. Therefore, they are not a political party and shouldn't be allowed to stand for elections.
ToaJoe 1 year ago
Your fired!!
namemasher 1 year ago
near the end, he shakes a ladie's hand, then everyone said something, then he shakes another ladies hand, why?
L30TM 1 year ago
@L30TM They said, "Hear, hear," which is a term used in houses of Parliament to express agreement. Usually said after a comment is made, I would assume that in this context it is the traditional way of politely showing approval in the Lords. I'm open to correction here, but I think applause is (at least traditionally) not the done thing in the UK Houses of Parliament. Here in Ireand, as with most other places, applause is fine.
reilly616 1 year ago
@reilly616 Ah okay makes sense thanks
L30TM 1 year ago
3 be 2 did well
richyb21 1 year ago
i cant stand all this formal shit
TuRdSandwitch18 1 year ago
rich twats
EMPRODUCTIONS2010 1 year ago
Ambitious used car salesman, admired by people who know nothing about life, and only really admire the accumulation of money. Used by Labour because he's one of the few successful business men who still looks like a dodgy working class geezer. Why does he still support Labour in his position? Tribal Labour man, really though, talks Labour, lives conservative.
Nabou1 1 year ago
@Nabou1 Bullshit!
Johnno85 1 year ago
@Johnno85 Clever response, Red John. I get used to the wisdom of the vacant so called left, you all seem to have the same vocabulary. Four legs good, two legs bad, it always ends up the same for all successful socialists - everyone's equal but some are more equal than others.
Nabou1 1 year ago
wtf is this twat doing as a Lord? So it seems both the Digital Bill and the enoblement of a knob was on the list of things to rush through before labour got kicked out. Anyone who has ever worked for this guy knows he is a money obsessed prick and cares for nobody!
cjellwood 1 year ago
@cjellwood how the christ would you know
and551 1 year ago
@and551 because I worked for him at Amstrad 15 years ago designing his fax machines. He had no concern for the quality of the product or the consumers, he just focused on profit. Maybe he is suited to governement?
cjellwood 1 year ago
Amazing what £200,000 gets you these days.
ednuttah 1 year ago
I like Alan Sugar. Straight forward, to the point and also seems like a plesant person.
234566tgvb 1 year ago
Gets made a Lord by liebour then donates 400.000 to them, your fired! sugar!
1965CAPTKIRK 1 year ago
@1965CAPTKIRK Labour gets 400,000 donated to them by an honest business like Sugar. The rich Tory cunts get millions of pounds donated to them by a criminal named Lord Ashcroft. Therefore, you cannot take the moral higher ground here. Fuck off.
ToaJoe 1 year ago
@ToaJoe Who said I was a Tory? they banned me from their website for saying same old bullshit different arseholes so you fuck off turd!
1965CAPTKIRK 1 year ago
This is why the Lords is still there. They make the trouble makers members. The accents may change but everything stays the same.
burntrim 1 year ago
lord pealcake of argyll and bute sounds like a good title for me :P
pealcake 1 year ago
Sugar affirmed his allegiance rather than "taking the oath": there was no bible and no reference to God. Compare this video to your one of Michael Martin. It's an important distinction, particularly for those people who believe in the separation of the state and religion.
jrawle 2 years ago
@jrawle Lord Sugar still 'took the oath'. He simply used the affirmation working instead of the religious version. Two important points: 1) The oath is to the Queen and not God. 2) I suspect Lord Sugar's decision to use the affirmation wording with no Bible and no reference to God is because Lord Sugar is Jewish. I doubt he gave any consideration to the so-called separation of church and state.
Andy1982able 1 year ago
Comment removed
jrawle 1 year ago
@Andy1982able The Oaths Act 1978 states that anyone is "permitted to make his solemn affirmation instead of taking an oath." So an affirmation is not an oath. The comment about religion was meant in general terms, not necessarily as Lord Sugar's motive for affirming. Historically, the oath was effectively a bar to certain people sitting in parliament, particularly Catholics and Jews. Google "the parliamentary oath" for an interesting paper on it.
jrawle 1 year ago
@Andy1982able: The Church and the State are one in the UK. Of course if he wanted to swear the oath rather than give a affirmation he could have used a copy of the Old Testiment (as you can't touch a Torah)
kanenkitten 1 year ago
cool beans
DavidMcMenamin 2 years ago
I'm so embarrased that this guy sits in the Lords, he shows no interest in it or the people suffering in the recession.
SirOrfeoKingofThrace 2 years ago
to the contrary he has given many a speech and engaged in many a debate on the recession and how we will get out of it...its these type of people who should be in the Lords someone with a little nuance of business acumen
scottc9100 1 year ago
i like the little smile when hackney got read
robthesamplist 2 years ago
Someone should have offered a you're fired as he left the chamber!!!
Nosmos 2 years ago
its liek little kids doin a play or sumat ha xD
kieltehsmith 2 years ago
jeez that man waffles on.
Jemeela 2 years ago
Haha, I bet he was thinking "sh*t I look like Santa"
Jiyuu89 2 years ago 31
@Jiyuu89 I bet he is thinking "oh come on, cut all the craps and let me go..."
guardianlighthouse 5 months ago