Added: 2 years ago
From: headzup
Views: 3,712
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (47)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • hhahahahaa

  • This one made me laugh pretty hard.

  • Would you please come up with something new? You can't shock people on the internet and this post is so overused and boring, no matter what little tweaks you give it here and there.

    If you can't come up with some original thought, if this little riff is the only thing that runs over and over through your feverish brain, please do the decent thing and have your medication adjusted and then go get some sleep.

  • but MOM!! haha priceless

  • Republican Senator Ensign doubled the salary of his mistress, doubled the salary of her husband, placed her son on the payroll, gave bonuses, gifts, and severance pay, & still had to get his parents to kick in an extra $96,000.00.

    I wouldn't be surpised if the total the GOP and his family paid out came to over $500,000 - a might expensive piece of ass.

    I guess I don't have to tell you that he thought it was the worst thing in the world that Bill Clinton had an affair.

  • I wonder if he had gotten her pregnant if his parents would have also payed for the abortion ?

  • This is one of the best!!!

  • haha this was hilarious

  • he could have had the mistress bumped off for alot less.

  • The correlation is weak at that. There is greater correlation between solar activity and change in temperature. That would also do more to explain why other planets have experienced warming/cooling. Since the whole green movement argument is that CO2 causes a rise in temperature, then what of the cooling of the Earth? There's no argument because the whole time you've been saying how CO2 warms the Earth. So if the Earth cools yet CO2 rises, then there is no man made climate change.

  • The earth hasn't been cooling as CO2 levels have risen.

    I don't deny that changes in solar activity can effect temperature but to think that emissions never have an effect is just naive

  • The industrial complex really took off following WW2. From 1940 until 1980, temperature of the Earth dropped. In that time period though we saw a massive increase in CO2 emissions. That completely negates the argument that a rise in CO2 emissions causes a rise in Earth temperature. There is absolutely no proof of causation whatsoever. There is only correlation. Correlation =/= Causation. Solar activity has a far greater effect than CO2. Especially since 0.04% of atmosphere is CO2.

  • Both parties are controlled by their fundamentalist elements.  Both go against the principles that this country was founded on.

  • No, I disagree. The Republicans are beholden to the religious base. Otherwise, THEY control their base by warning them about Big Government and elitism, all the while passing Patriot Acts and gutting legislation that regulates and curbs financial elites. Democrats, I don't even know what they are. They promise to stop the Republicans, but all they ever accomplish is wasteful spending.

  • Hahaha. It's like Napoleon Dynamite and Cartman put together.

  • Is he trying to out do sanford

  • God damn, are there any Republicans who AREN'T having affairs??!!?!?!?

    By comparison, my life as a non-Republican (I'm not Democrat either) is so dull - at least from the perspective of a tabloid reporter.

    But I guess that just goes with the territory when you have a moral compass...

  • Republican Ron Paul is not having affairs but as an OB/GYN he's seen more vaginas than Wilt Chamberlain.

  • @undies in a bunch: That is soooo funny! (OBGYN) Thanks for the laugh!

    Yeah, it's hard to remember Ron Paul is a "real" Republican. If his views were still part of the Republican platform, then hell *I*d probably even join.

    Realistically Ron Paul should invent a new party. Modern republicans have destroyed the name of their party and it's beyond Pauls powers to lift them back up to respectability.

    If an awful party name like "the wigs" was once popular then there is room for new names. :D

  • Nice ... Napoleon Dynamite?

  • I know, i was like, why's he talking like Napoleon Dynamite?? lol

  • would've been cheaper to go the Spitzer route and get $1000 hookers instead

  • Just goes to show you Democrats really are more fiscally conservative. No wonder Clinton was the only president in recent history to run a surplus. He had enough good fiscal instinct to get it for free.

  • I'm a Clinton fan and even I find this extremely hilarious and clever. Good job!

  • Hey, me too, but that doesn't mean we can't poke fun at our own side now and then. :)

    Personally, I really don't think the guy who controls nuclear weapons needs to be sexually frustrated anyway.

  • Where have you been the past 6 months? In a cave? the words Democrat & fiscally conservative do not belong in the same sentence unless you're saying "Democrats are NOT fiscally conservative."

    Clinton did balance the budget, by raiding the Social Security fund and bankrupting it.

  • Clinton played accounting games but so did Reagan and both Bush's, so you can't cry foul there. W.Bush took the practice to new heights but spinning out war spending. To Obama's credit, he's the first in a long time to break with that trend.

    As for the last 6 months, Obama is trying to jumpstart the economy Bush wrecked and clean up Bush's other messes. If you want fiscal conservatism, I have to ask you where YOU were the last 8 years when the Rep's were the proverbial drunken sailors.

  • I was protesting against Bush for his wars and subversion of civil liberties and destruction of the Constitution. I was working on the Ron Paul campaign. Thats where I was the past 8 years, not playing party politics like you.

    Keynesian economics doesn't work. You cannot fix the problem of reckless spending by spending more. You're just feeding the bubble that popped. You're re-inflating the bubble. You will only hurt the lower & middle class with the inflation that is to come.

  • No one here said Keynesian economics worked. I certainly don't think it does-- you don't keep putting gas into a car that may explode at anytime (the bubble metaphor is a cliche; its not perfect, but that's a new one).

    And for the love of god don't mention Ron Paul; i said a fairly neutral criticism about him once on a video and got 4 death-threats in a matter of 5 minutes.

  • OK, well good for you that you were protesting the last 8 years. I admit that I'm not happy that our current choices seem to be the Christian Fascist party vs. same-guys-but-more-moderate party. It would be nice if the Dems would fold up their tent and hand the reins over to a group of real progressives.

    I like Ron Paul on foreign policy, which got most of the attention in the media, but isn't he a fundy Christian?

  • Ron Paul is not a fundamentalist Christian at all. He is basically a libertarian. He is pro-life because of what he has seen as an OBGYN.

    I wouldnt call the Dems the slightly more moderate party either. This Green movement has turned progressives into fundamentalists of their own brand. There is no real science behind it that proves man is causing change in climate but to speak out against it is blasphemy. You are treated like a Holocaust denier if you speak out against climate change.

  • Just to clarify your opinion, do you deny that the climate is getting warmer or do you think that this change isn't caused by humanity's activities?

  • I deny that man is causing climate change. The whole argument is that CO2 causes the rise in temperature. If it were so, then after WW2, when the industrial complex really took off, there would be a constant rise in temperature. There wasnt, in fact 4 decades following WW2, temperature fell. 0.04% of our atmosphere is CO2 & man is not the greatest contributor. Volcanoes, the ocean, dying vegetation, animal & bacteria all contribute more than man does. Correlation is not causation.

  • people like dennis K and Bernie Sanders are better than ROn Paul

  • Liberals don't want fiscally conservative. We want someone who will govern with responsiblity not destroy government. Libertarian ppolitics have some good ideas but do, in solidarity, do not create a responsible government.

  • Right....

    Looks like we have a very responsible government at this point in time. Its like theyre doing everything in their power to destroy the dollar, take away our civil liberties, create a terrible economic environment, tax us to high heaven & give away our tax dollars to their cronies & corporations. A libertarian govt is more responsible because it would actually operate within the confines of the Constitution.

  • Or just go the Bill Clinton route and have them killed when you lose interest or when they get pregnant. Monica saved her life by going public because she didn't want to end up like former Bill Clinton intern Mary Mahoney.

  • lol didnt know my comment would attract the president of the tin foil hat society. Sure we all know how Bill Clinton sleeps with and kills women, who doesnt!?!? ;)

  • Vice President.

  • hahaha

  • lol

  • Repugs get pwnd every other day, its crazy that theres still any of them left.

  • Repugs should learn from Bill Clinton:

    Mary Mahoney executed at Starbucks but ruled a robbery even though $4000 remained in the store 1997.

    Judy Gibbs burns to death when her house burns down 1996.

    Ed Willey commits suicide same day his wife Kathleen is sexually assaulted by Bill 1993.

    Paula Grober accidentally dies in a one-car high-speed accident with no known witnesses 1992.

    Pregnant Suzanne Coleman commits suicide with a gunshot to the back of her head 1990.

  • haha funny video

  • Everyone Google Jeff Bootstraps Fisher and watch so many crooked politians scamble.

  • first.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more