me ne suna he shiaism me ap apni maao or bahano k sath zana kr skte ho apne L*** pe resham ka kapra charha kar asal yazeed k bachy ye sheea log he lanat in par ahle bait ki.... aaattthhhuuuu
It should be remembered that the paternal aunt of Shimr, Umm Banin bint Kharam, was the wife of Hazrat Ali (Karramallahu taala wajhah) and whose off-springs were Abbas, Abdullah, Jafar, and Uthman and all the four brothers were accompanying Imam Husain in this encounter. Thus Shimr was the paternal cousin of all the four brothers and also of Imam Husain (radiyallahu anh).
SANAN WHO CRITICALLY INJURED HUSSAIN WAS A PERSIAN SHIA, SHIMR LAIN WHO CUT HEAD OF HUSSAIN WAS A SHIA.
To provide a solid proof of this fact (i.e. that Shimr was a Shia), we refer to the esteemed and classical Shia scholar, Al-Qummi. Al-Qummi, author of the famous book Mafaatihul-Jinaan, writes in his book: I say, Shimr was in the forces of Ameer al-Mumineen on the Day of Siffin. (Al-Qummi, Safinatun-Najaat, vol.4, p. 492, Chapter Sheen Followed by Meem).
Shimr lain was not only shia but also real parental nephew of umul banin, wife of ali.
@UsmanAli771 This is absolutely false and a weak argument. With a rational mind I ask you to define the term "shia". Look at the quran for reference, (Quran 37:83), and (Quran 28:15), etc. Basically, the term "shia" is a religious word that represents a devoted "follower" of Ibrahim (pbuh), Moses (pbuh), Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and the Ahlulbayt (pbut). How could anyone who follows the lineage of Prophet Muhammad kill his grandson? That just contradicts the term and your argument.
To this day, the Shia still commemorate Ashura by doing Matam (self-flagellation). This ritual was passed down the generations by the Al-Tawwabun (the Penitents) showing us that the Shia of today originate from the same Shia of Kufa who betrayed Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). The very reason that the Shia beat themselves is to punish themselves for this betrayal of the Ahlel Bayt.
KILLERS OF AHLE BAIT POSE AS LOVERS OF AHLE BAIT.
To this day, the Shia still commemorate Ashura by doing Matam (self-flagellation). This ritual was passed down the generations by the Al-Tawwabun (the Penitents) showing us that the Shia of today originate from the same Shia of Kufa who betrayed Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). The very reason that the Shia beat themselves is to punish themselves for this betrayal of the Ahlel Bayt.
@MuhammadAhmad1 Once again, you promote nothing but ignorance and baseless statements. The ritual of matam (self-flagellation) originated from Hz. Owais Al-Qarni (r.a.), a devoted sahaba of the Prophet (pbuh). Upon hearing the news that the Prophet had his teeth broken in the battle of uhud, Hz. Owais pulled one of his own teeth out (because of his love towards the Beloved Prophet). Upon hearing this news of Owais breaking his teeth, Prophet praised his act and praised him
The Shia mourning on Ashura has little do with their love for Hussain (رضّى الله عنه), but rather has more to do with their hatred of the Sunnis. Why else do they not comemmorate the martyrdoms of their other heroes, such as Ali (رضّى الله عنه) or Hamza (رضّى الله عنه)? The truth is that Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was killed by the Khawarij, a group of the Shia! This is why the Shia today do not make a big fuss about the death of Ali since it was a man from their own party who killed him.
@MuhammadAhmad1 What makes your statement and islamic knowledge look absolutely repulsive is the fact that the term "shia". "And most surely Abraham was among the Shia of him (i.e., Noah)" (Quran 37:83). The term means "follower". The shias of today are shias of Ali (as) who was himself (as) a shia of Muhammad (pbuh). So as you can see, we are simply followers of Muhammad (pbuh).
With that said, exactly how can someone refer to himself as a "shia of Ali (as)" and murder their own leader?
@MuhammadAhmad1 You see, you follow a religion that is still immersed in hatred. We shias perform these rituals to commemorate the sacrifice made by Maula Ali (as) and his progeny so we could avoid hatred, religious incompetence, and ignorance; all three for which you evidently posses. I dare you to bring quranic reference if you truly have credibility in your statements of hate towards "shias"
@akmnawab110 ,The Shia betrayed Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Hasan (رضّى الله عنه), Hussain (رضّى الله عنه), and Zayd ibn Ali ibn Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). The irony is not lost that the Shia claim to be lovers of the Ahlel Bayt and yet historically they have betrayed them and lead to the deaths of Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Hussain (رضّى الله عنه), and Hussain’s grandson (رضّى الله عنه).
The Shia of Kufa outnumbered Yezid’s men 18,000 to 4,000. Actually, the number was greater than 18,000; 18,000 was simply the number of men who had pledged Bayat (oath of allegiance) to protect Hussain. Had they wanted to, the Shia of Kufa could have defeated Yezid’s men and protected Hussain. But instead, they did nothing but watch from afar with cowardice. The Shia of today will eulogize this day and talk about how 71 men fought against 4,000 of Yezid’s troops. Where did the other 18,000 go?
This has been flagged as spam show
me ne suna he shiaism me ap apni maao or bahano k sath zana kr skte ho apne L*** pe resham ka kapra charha kar asal yazeed k bachy ye sheea log he lanat in par ahle bait ki.... aaattthhhuuuu
urjaanoeo 2 months ago
Ek he dafa Gardan Kaat lo na !!!!
FinalCounterStrike 4 months ago
Abe ek he dafa gardan kaat lo na !!!!
counterstrike4u 7 months ago
WHO MADE IMAM HUSSAIN A MAZLOOM,? SHIAS OF KUFA.
ON WHOSE INVITATION HUSSAIN LEFT MAKKAH AND WENT TO KUFA? SHIAS OF KUFA.
WHO WROTE LETTERS TO HUSSAIN TO COME TO KUFA? SHIAS OF KUFA.
WHO DECEIVED ,LEFT HUSSAIN ALONE AND RAN AWAY? SHIAS OF KUFA.
WHO CRITICALLY INJURED HUSSAIN AND CUT HEAD OF HUSSAIN? SHIAS.
WHO INFORMED IBNE ZIAD THAT AQEEL IS HIDING IN A HOUSE? SHIAS OF KUFA.
NOW WHY SHIAS ARE DOING DRAMA OF AZADARI? WHERE THERE AZADARI DISAPPEAR FOR OTHER 10 IMAMS AND HAMZA?
12342026 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It should be remembered that the paternal aunt of Shimr, Umm Banin bint Kharam, was the wife of Hazrat Ali (Karramallahu taala wajhah) and whose off-springs were Abbas, Abdullah, Jafar, and Uthman and all the four brothers were accompanying Imam Husain in this encounter. Thus Shimr was the paternal cousin of all the four brothers and also of Imam Husain (radiyallahu anh).
SANAN WHO CRITICALLY INJURED HUSSAIN WAS A PERSIAN SHIA, SHIMR LAIN WHO CUT HEAD OF HUSSAIN WAS A SHIA.
UsmanAli771 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A Shia Killed Sayyiduna Hussain:
To provide a solid proof of this fact (i.e. that Shimr was a Shia), we refer to the esteemed and classical Shia scholar, Al-Qummi. Al-Qummi, author of the famous book Mafaatihul-Jinaan, writes in his book: I say, Shimr was in the forces of Ameer al-Mumineen on the Day of Siffin. (Al-Qummi, Safinatun-Najaat, vol.4, p. 492, Chapter Sheen Followed by Meem).
Shimr lain was not only shia but also real parental nephew of umul banin, wife of ali.
UsmanAli771 8 months ago
@UsmanAli771 This is absolutely false and a weak argument. With a rational mind I ask you to define the term "shia". Look at the quran for reference, (Quran 37:83), and (Quran 28:15), etc. Basically, the term "shia" is a religious word that represents a devoted "follower" of Ibrahim (pbuh), Moses (pbuh), Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) and the Ahlulbayt (pbut). How could anyone who follows the lineage of Prophet Muhammad kill his grandson? That just contradicts the term and your argument.
akmnawab110 8 months ago
In ko bud dua hai yeh qayamat tak apney aap ko peety gayn. Jahil shia kafir
786FH 1 year ago
@786FH khabees aik he bar pait mein kyun nahi marlete agar ziyada he gham hai tu ullo k phattey
tumpassaye 11 months ago
@786FH do you have any proof in the form of quranic evidence to back up your claim?
akmnawab110 8 months ago
Shia are kafir. They have no connection with islam.They are kafirzz
786FH 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
To this day, the Shia still commemorate Ashura by doing Matam (self-flagellation). This ritual was passed down the generations by the Al-Tawwabun (the Penitents) showing us that the Shia of today originate from the same Shia of Kufa who betrayed Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). The very reason that the Shia beat themselves is to punish themselves for this betrayal of the Ahlel Bayt.
KILLERS OF AHLE BAIT POSE AS LOVERS OF AHLE BAIT.
MuhammadAhmad1 1 year ago
To this day, the Shia still commemorate Ashura by doing Matam (self-flagellation). This ritual was passed down the generations by the Al-Tawwabun (the Penitents) showing us that the Shia of today originate from the same Shia of Kufa who betrayed Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). The very reason that the Shia beat themselves is to punish themselves for this betrayal of the Ahlel Bayt.
MuhammadAhmad1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MuhammadAhmad1
**************YA ALI MADAD**************
Jab Kabhi zikre Hussain(as) ka bayan hota hai
To bughz chehra e Iblees se aya hota hai
Kya ajab raaz matam e Shabeer me hai
haath parta hai yahan aur dard wahan hota hai.
**************YA ALI MADAD**************
indianhero110 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MuhammadAhmad1
**************YA ALI MADAD**************
Jab Kabhi zikre Hussain(as) ka bayan hota hai
To bughz chehra e Iblees se aya hota hai
Kya ajab raaz matam e Shabeer me hai
haath parta hai yahan aur dard wahan hota hai.
**************YA ALI MADAD**************
indianhero110 1 year ago
@MuhammadAhmad1 Once again, you promote nothing but ignorance and baseless statements. The ritual of matam (self-flagellation) originated from Hz. Owais Al-Qarni (r.a.), a devoted sahaba of the Prophet (pbuh). Upon hearing the news that the Prophet had his teeth broken in the battle of uhud, Hz. Owais pulled one of his own teeth out (because of his love towards the Beloved Prophet). Upon hearing this news of Owais breaking his teeth, Prophet praised his act and praised him
akmnawab110 1 year ago
@akmnawab110 , WHY ALI DID NOT BREAK HIS TEETH ?
UsmanAli771 8 months ago
@UsmanAli771 why would Maula Ali (as) break his teeth when he was the only Muslim left defending Islam and the Prophet of Islam (pbuh) in uhud?
akmnawab110 8 months ago
@akmnawab110 , ali was only muslim? you shias have proved ali true. ali said that a group will go to hell in my love upto shirk (shias).
MuhammadAhmad1 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Shia mourning on Ashura has little do with their love for Hussain (رضّى الله عنه), but rather has more to do with their hatred of the Sunnis. Why else do they not comemmorate the martyrdoms of their other heroes, such as Ali (رضّى الله عنه) or Hamza (رضّى الله عنه)? The truth is that Ali (رضّى الله عنه) was killed by the Khawarij, a group of the Shia! This is why the Shia today do not make a big fuss about the death of Ali since it was a man from their own party who killed him.
MuhammadAhmad1 1 year ago
@MuhammadAhmad1 What makes your statement and islamic knowledge look absolutely repulsive is the fact that the term "shia". "And most surely Abraham was among the Shia of him (i.e., Noah)" (Quran 37:83). The term means "follower". The shias of today are shias of Ali (as) who was himself (as) a shia of Muhammad (pbuh). So as you can see, we are simply followers of Muhammad (pbuh).
With that said, exactly how can someone refer to himself as a "shia of Ali (as)" and murder their own leader?
akmnawab110 1 year ago
@MuhammadAhmad1 You see, you follow a religion that is still immersed in hatred. We shias perform these rituals to commemorate the sacrifice made by Maula Ali (as) and his progeny so we could avoid hatred, religious incompetence, and ignorance; all three for which you evidently posses. I dare you to bring quranic reference if you truly have credibility in your statements of hate towards "shias"
akmnawab110 1 year ago
@akmnawab110 ,The Shia betrayed Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Hasan (رضّى الله عنه), Hussain (رضّى الله عنه), and Zayd ibn Ali ibn Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). The irony is not lost that the Shia claim to be lovers of the Ahlel Bayt and yet historically they have betrayed them and lead to the deaths of Ali (رضّى الله عنه), Hussain (رضّى الله عنه), and Hussain’s grandson (رضّى الله عنه).
MuhammadAhmad1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Shia of Kufa outnumbered Yezid’s men 18,000 to 4,000. Actually, the number was greater than 18,000; 18,000 was simply the number of men who had pledged Bayat (oath of allegiance) to protect Hussain. Had they wanted to, the Shia of Kufa could have defeated Yezid’s men and protected Hussain. But instead, they did nothing but watch from afar with cowardice. The Shia of today will eulogize this day and talk about how 71 men fought against 4,000 of Yezid’s troops. Where did the other 18,000 go?
MuhammadAhmad1 1 year ago
geo matam da ro !!
pakforlive12 2 years ago