so the point is ... we can run any house hold device off a car battery when we use a power converter .... the scam they killed John kanzius for is he stumbled on that which they were trying to hide.. water spliting at such a high rate it can run any generator to produe high voltage and some to spare
@frank0067 Holy shit..... now he was assassinated? You've got to be joking. You have now convinced me you are delusional. He stumbled on technology that has been known about for years? You're right, no one before him though to use this technology to light on fire. Haha, of course they thought of it, but again, it's... not... economical...
It appears you are not willing to listen to logic, since I've said most of this stuff to you about four times each. And you come back with assassination...
@frank0067 Ok, frank. Do you understand that this system requires an input of more energy than it gives back? Answer this very simple question for me. Do you understand that?
@bweazel BOY you one of yhose people with their head stuck in the sand arent you.. you belive anything the media tells ya... i can tell by your answers...
John Kanzius is on video saying the very oposite what you said... he said it can replace the energy in the automobile... which BTW is heavery for no good reason whatso ever but to burn MORE OIL !.. c cant belive my eyes He had lukemia sure but he death had Nothing to do with it. but HEY another coincedence only for you.
@bweazel keep belive that bs quip... takes more than gives out... READ MY LIPS.. IT DOES NOT !! its a lie
look at ALL the stuff your car controls electrialcly .. including headlights tails lights blinkers windshield washers front and rear..foggers horn radio cdplayers air conditioning fuel pump fan heater power windows cab-lights cigerett lighters .. what else did i miss !!. and ALL comes off of the alternator puting out less than 14 volts .
you have gull to tell me all thats less than RWG??
@frank0067 What's your point? None of those really require much energy. Plus, that engine is being powered by gasoline, not salt water. This must be hard to accept for you, this many facts. Let it soak in over the night, see if you feel differently about it in the morning.
@bweazel LOL you get more ridicoulous each time..... an alternator does not run on gasoline... LMAO
the belt from the engine turns it... another magic device maybe??
depending on the alternator but commonly they give out less than 14 volts... which is another scam in itself should be lot more.. and Kanzius even says you can use this to run cars on !!
@frank0067 Never said it did. What I said was the engine is powered by gasoline. The alternator is powered by a belt attached to the engine. Not claiming to be an expert on cars, but it takes a real special idiot to behave as though gasoline does not indirectly power the alternator.
You are bat shit insane, lol ;) I'm done with ya. Have a nice life.
@bweazel comon scense should show ya... a radio wave generator is same as any other device much less power needed even... yet your car can run a HTEAR - windshield wiper motor - fuel pump and lights and radio all at same time !
listen dont get frustrated... BIG Oi and auto is behind but not the top off of this BS supression
@frank0067 You are a paranoid, delusional idiot, frank. You clearly have zero idea about anything, especially science or the fundamentals of it. Continuing this conversation with you would be a complete waste of my time, sorry. "a radio wave generator is same as any other device much less power needed even" You see what I mean? No one can argue with such persistent ignorance and idiocy (which looks willful on your part). Again, have a nice life, and stop wasting my time.
@frank0067 I just found this on his Wikipedia page. I thought it might interest you. "Kanzius admitted that this process could not be considered an energy source, as more energy is used to produce the RF signal than can be obtained from the burning gas and stated in July 2007 that he never claimed his discovery would replace oil, asserting only that his discovery was 'thought provoking.'" (Ogden, Shannon (2007-07-05). "Salt Water Fuel". First Coast News.)
@frank0067 As for your " the scam they killed John kanzius for" business, the man was diagnosed with leukemia in the late 90's before he even started working on this project, and underwent chemotherapy for many years. He died of pneumonia. He was not assassinated because he discovered some wild breakthrough that Big Oil is trying to keep under wraps. He seems to have been trying to extend his own life, and will end up helping thousands. Honestly, I think you need to seek medical attention, sir.
@frank0067 To have them at the intensity to cause this chain reaction, yes, you do. You need more energy than the reaction gives back in energy, thus, a wasteful form of energy. Not to mention that water vapor is the largest green house gas, for all those that may be climate change prone ;)
@bweazel i thnk your quite wrong... what it gives back is much more than we see here...and what we even see here is something also not shown...steam engine which can provide more than enough power to make the power for a radio generator ...
btw its not the power which does this is the key square wave feqency
@frank0067 No, it's not much more than you see here. It is a tiny flame produced by using high intensity radio waves to separate hydrogen atoms from water molecules. And what it gives back is the hydrogen gas, that is then lit on fire. This is a non economical way of producing fire. Simple as that, bro.
What you "think" really isn't important. You'll need to do more than just say "more is going on than we can see", yes, that's obvious, but what is it you think is going on here?
@frank0067 It is a tiny flame. Ya, well the larger flask you have, the more energy that needs to go into it. Plenty of people have duplicated it. Again, it is not economical, and that's why no one does this on a large scale. Why? Because it is not a viable option for producing energy, just a neat science experiment.
No, no suppression. For about the twentieth time now, it... is... not... economical. Do you understand that? If this is so profitable, why don't you make one and save us all?
@frank0067 Has anyone ever built his exact machine? No, but that doesn't mean the method isn't used to do thing like break down water molecules so people can breath under water in submarines, or in space. The Navy and NASA both use these methods. You keep acting like this is some new breakthrough, it's really not. It's old tech, that someone put a spin on. No one ever thought about lighting it on fire before, because they thought what's the point? Takes more energy than you get back.
@bweazel Listen someone else is gonna buy that stuff your throwing around..but Not me... thats such a ridiculous answer... first... IT IS a viable solution ...it IS free energy even for goodness sakes. but i belive i already sted that.
The only saps who chirping out that ..takes More energy thanit puts out answer is the folks who are trying to hideing the invention, and there is a number of them.
@frank0067 You must be a moron then, frank. If you can't understand that this method of creating energy gives you less energy back than it requires you put in, then you are an idiot. It is viable, sure, it is not economical or efficient or even necessary. If you get power from the wall outlet, what is the point of using that same wall outlet to power a machine to give you a different form of energy? There's no point at all.
@frank0067 That's exactly my point, sir. And where do you think the heat comes from? Magic heat fairies? No, it comes from coal (for the most part). So what you're saying here is: Let's dig up coal, burn it, so we can use a radio frequency generator to split water molecules and burn hydrogen, which gives us less energy back than the energy of burning coal.
Your idiocy is really starting to bother me, and you're over 40? That's just shameful, you should know better by your age.
@frank0067 So what you are advocating is that we waste energy, to get energy. Where the fuck is your logic? Where else does logic like this apply in your life? Do you waste money to get less money back? Waste food to get less food back? Name me a single spot in your life where you spend more of something, knowing full well you will get less of that same thing back. Again, what's the point?
Tell me, frank. Do you think this motor could power the computer you're on right now? 1:58 Be honest.
@bweazel thats just supressive double talk bs ... your understand ing of things comes throught this confority of supressivesness..
DO you know that Big oil and auto makes us pay highest price for gas because the veicle and engline is MADE to do just that.. weakeast sprk-plug made.. heaveny veilce timeing retarded.. liquid gas injection ...intake air choked .. ECU made to rat out better combustion and ratify that... Modelt T FORD 20- 25 mpg .. todat average car gets 15-20 mpg.. by design
@frank0067 You're bordering on paranoid delusions, sir. My understanding of this particular scenario comes from common sense, which is: don't be wasteful. Using 2000 watts, to give you hardly 400 back is not a good way to get energy. Why you are trying to argue this with me, I have no idea. That should be pretty obvious to you that this is not a good way to get energy, since it requires another form of energy to break the bonds to make what you're seeing possible.
@frank0067 This has very little to do with Big Oil. Since very little of our grid power comes from oil. Also, the Model T weighed about 1000 lbs. Modern cars weigh anywhere from 3000lbs up. The average MPG is higher than that too, so it looks like we're doing much better than the scenario you are trying to paint there.
@frank0067 What part of using a 2000-watt radio generator is free? Do you realize how stupid and paranoid you are making yourself look here? I'm done going back and forth with you, if you can look at this video, and can think to yourself that this is "free" energy, you are an uneducated putz, and it's a poor investment to try to help you understand the world. Have a nice life, sir. Perhaps you should read a couple books, just a thought.
@frank0067 "steam engine which can provide more than enough power to make the power for a radio generator ..." Uh huh, and where do you get the energy to fire the steam turbine? Coal? Wood? Oil? Natural gas? It's got to come from some where.
"btw its not the power which does this is the key square wave feqency" It is the power that does this. More power is needed than this reaction gives back. Stop trying to make this more complex than it is.
@frank0067 No, it is not much more than you see here. It's just that. Using a shit ton of radio waves to break down water. I like how you smart guys come on here behaving as though there is some secret use to this guys invention which he said cannot be used the way you are saying it can. Sorry. Like I told the last guy. Go take your meds.
OK, so this sounds great, but... First, the cancer issue. Been there done that. This technique was investigated 30 years ago at the University of Arizona (and several associated universities). Second, the energy that he is putting into disassociating the hydrogen and oxygen in water is greater than the energy returned by burning it. Entropy always wins.
@FreepWonk Have you seen the data from John Kanzius' research? If so, you can not make any claims about energy in vs. energy out. John Kanzius was never claiming over-unity in his device. However, you ARE wrong about entropy always winning. There is a loophole; dark energy and its entrainment in certain configurations of high voltage transducers creating the Casimir Effect. I suggest you watch my Moray King video.
Don't let it go John!!! the oil companies will buy it, patent it and bury it. They've done that with electric cars, and they'll do it with your invention.
@solunasunrise Greed of oil barons? I really don't think that has anything to do with it at all. Let's say I came to you with this idea, and I said hey solunasunrise, I have an idea for new "clean" energy, but the catch is that you'll have to pay more into this system, than the system will give you back in revenue. So it's going to end up being a black hole of money for you, and you will never receive a penny doing it. Would you buy it? Can I send the contract to your house? ;)
@nedmorlef It has nothing to do with man being greedy. Has everything to do with nature being difficult. As soon as you invent clean, truly renewable energy and you break the riddle that nature has put before us, let us know, until then, keep uneducated comments like that to yourself.
Advantage: No electrodes to get dirty, efficiency doesn't degrade over time.
Disadvantage: Hydrogen, Oxygen, (possibly Sodium & Chlorine) need to be separated with this device. With traditional electrolysis, Hydrogen bubbles at the cathode, and Oxygen bubbles at the anode.
Can this be more efficient than the sulfur-iodine cycle? Will it find its niche in small scale production? Could this be combined with high-pressure electrolysis?
hahah yeah wow thats amazing. But i can already see this NEVER hitting the public. i mean this video was uploaded 3 years ago...... who knows how long it was out there before that...... too bad people love petroleum and dont give a flying fuck enough to sacrifice.
@fenderflipper No one is buying it because it is not economically efficient. Why would want to spend money (energy) to get less money (energy) back? No one would, and that's exactly why your house doesn't run on one of these right now.
@bweazel Storage and distribution. Storage: A solar powered home could use excess energy to create hydrogen during the day, and use the hydrogen at night or on cloudy days. Rechargeable batteries take more energy to charge than they put out, but people use them for their storage value. Distribution: A plant could use solar or wind energy to create hydrogen gas and pipe it out to customers like natural gas. No one is buying it because this method was just discovered.
@youcrackmeupdude If the solar energy is enough to power this process, then it is enough to power the home on it's own, most likely, and the whole hydrogen part is unnecessary. That's the whole point, to get this reaction, you need to have more energy to make the reaction, than the reaction gives you back in energy. It's a net loss, therefore, wasteful. The entire process is not economically feasible.
For example: It's possible to melt rock, but wouldn't you rather use wood for heat? ;)
@Dxxchrisable This is a cute science experiment, but that's about all it is. It is not sustainable, nor does it net positive energy, it actually nets negative energy, so it takes more energy to get this reaction you're seeing, than the reaction is actually putting off.
@bweazel I asked my self the same question. But it does make a difference, cause all you would need is electricity enough to make the combustion. And I bet that drains down the energy comsumption as well. So its a win win scenario. Im not an engineer, or anything. Just the best educated guess I can imagine.
@EricShookRools Not in a high enough energy to power anything with though, which is exactly the point I was making. If radio waves worked the way you were behaving as though they do, there would be no need to plug in your radio or TV or anything else that receives a signal. Sure, they're everywhere, so are light waves, x-rays, gamma rays and the rest of the spectrum, it's a question of energy intensity though, not one of these waves merely being around us at all times.
@EricShookRools Now, if you could find a way to convert normal energy into a higher intensity energy, without adding in any other energy, I'm sure lots of people would be very curious as to how you did that ;)
@clarkdef Haha, well, I'll go with what the inventor of the machine said. And he said that it is not a viable energy source. His actual quote is on here a couple pages back, I think you should read it. Wrong, more energy is required to power the machine than the energy it gives back, but ok, I'll let you think you know what you're talking about.
@bweazel Must use a lot of power, I have gotten a lawnmower which is 4hp to power my 54" tv. I think that the fuel could work or be viable if it could be made to not burn so hot so not a good idea to dismiss something you know little about. But yeah I would say that not being viable would be 1. freq not responding well within cyclinder. 2. flame burning too hot for use within engine.
@bweazel But nah don't agree with the powering it argument, a typical alternator uses about 2-4hp to run properly and is capable of producing over 2000watts
@clarkdef How can you all read the quote from the inventor himself, saying it is not an alternative to oil and it takes more power to run it than it gives you back in power, and still reply to me arguing against the inventor. It's ridiculous. I'll say it again, I will take the inventors word over yours any day of the week.
@clarkdef And in case you're too lazy: "Kanzius admitted that this process could not be considered an energy source, as more energy is used to produce the RF signal than can be obtained from the burning gas and stated in July 2007 that he never claimed his discovery would replace oil, asserting only that his discovery was 'thought provoking.'" (Ogden, Shannon (2007-07-05). "Salt Water Fuel". First Coast News.)
I am really glad people are getting to see this and get an education in scientific discovery. If the machine takes more energy than it emits, well it ends up being a proof that hydrogen exists and nothing more. There are plenty of machines that do clever things but are not practical for everyday issues such as travel. Maybe some young scientist will be watching and use the idea to resolve an issue that is practical.
This isn't as amazing as it would seem. You can't violate the laws of thermodynamics, and this radio wave generator-for-hydrogen proves that. It uses high amounts of energy to produce those radio waves. It is still less energy intensive to use other methods of electrolysis for hydrogen technology. Other than the gold nanoparticles, there is no real innovation here. Sorry.
@bobstevefrank123 The device he was using was really low power, dude. It ran off of a singe AC current. Plus you can burn all of it at once by charging a capacitor and using that as a source of power.
Did you know that the capacitor in a disposable camera, powered by a measly AAA generates enough electricity to emulate a single burst from a stungun? Some capacitors can melt the heads of screwdrivers. My uncle said that, and he has been in the business for a long time.
Free energy technology exists!But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the energy revolution!
Hilarious. What a crock of shit. As so many commenters here already state, the energy IN is more than the energy OUT therefore he is achieving NOTHING!
@HitMeWithIt achieving nothing??? ...BOY i never seen someone so brain smacked as you man...
This is one of the greatest discoveries in our history !!
One thing that cures yes CURES cancer and KNock off oil and supressive energy cartels... while providing the answer to FREE energy .. ALL in one item !
There's so much bad reporting here it's laughable.
Oh look radio waves can kill cancer cells, really? mm I wonder where that idea came from....maybe from the research carried out by the medical proffession over the last 50-60 years......
Basically all that is happening is that the radio waves are absorbed by the impurites in the water,NaCl, MgCl etc. They get excited, they form elemental Mg & Na. These then oxidise ripping the O2 from the H20. This is exothermic chemistry and well known.
How much energy does it take to release the hydrogen? Does it take more or equal amount of energy to produce that effect, if it does then what's the advantage? Maybe someone can enlighten me.
I don't get why people get confused by stuff like this, the laws of thermodynamics say that more energy HAS TO be going into breaking the water apart initially than is coming from the flame this is no free energy, there is no such thing. Now, as for using it as a way of storing solar for an indefinite period, that makes more sense, but remember we have been able to do this same thing through electrolysis more efficiently for a VERY VERY Long time. Can't believe this hack news station ran this
For all practical purposes, consider water being an infinite commodity. Not in a million years could humans "burn" enough water to deplete the oceans. Also, water is free. Thats why its a good thing
When the HHO gas is burned, it turns right back into water. There is no casue for concern. There are millions of hosue sized comet chucks hitting earth weekly, healing the ozone, and adding more water to the planet anyway
Infinite .....That is why its called a Water Cycle...at least they haven't destroyed that part of education.
That means once you car has finished with it then it goes back to the clouds and comes back down as rain. The problem with this is that is too good and put an end to this mass media farce that is global warming. RP2012
Manmade global warming is real. Air pollution is also real. The farce is the politicization of thse issues and the "solutions" to them (e.g. carbon tax), which don't address the problem. I like RP, but please don't use this page for his campaign.
@32GaugeSlug Global warming may not be real, but sending billions of dollars per year overseas certainly is. The globlal warming scam serves one good purpose, it will help get people off oil
@UTubeFreeMind wait are you saying you believe this will generate energy and global warming is not real or what? because this thing is just a cool way to do electrolysis it generates no power and global warming is real lol its a matter of how much we cause. which we release 100times the co2 of volcanoes and co2 absorbes infrared and the earth emit it. Also if we had no co2 or rather no green house effect earths temp would be closer to the moon or mars. idk how people argue against it.
oil is far more finite then salt water. do u realize how much salt water there is relative to the amount of cars? it would prolong the inevitable but a great invention. I wonder what happens to the burnt water and if there are any environmental effects from it.
This solves only half of the issue anyways, it would be great that we would stop raping the world of it's solidified carbon... but you still need energy to create the radiowaves, and it would still be a combustion vehicle anyways. Just because it's abundant doesn't mean should burn it, or anything for that matter.
@discodenial There is an overunity scenario when dealing with high voltage and high frequencies. The energy is coming from the quantum level via the Casimir Effect and the reverse of this phenomenon, and by many other means usually involving the Tesla Switch. Rodin Coils and Hall Effect Transistors can also entrain this quantum energy available everywhere in the universe. It's been suppressed by TPTB to maintain their monopolies but it soon will change. You'll just have to trust me :-)
@mattimber The energy is coming from the theoretical quantum level? Haha, are you sure it's not coming from the breaking of the water molecules and the burning of hydrogen? I think it's safe to say that the energy is coming from the chemical and atomic level.
I dunno, if this was discovered over a year ago I think this technology would be refined enough to have been put to use in a practical application that would be common by now.
Yes, that is a typical response from folks who discover that they've been lied to about science and things like free energy supression and cancer cures might exist (e.g. Dr.'s Riech, Rife, Tesla, & John Kanzius). Look up Cognitive Dissonance. Free energy and cancer cure is possible and has been supressed going back 100 years. Google "PES Suppression" and see what I mean.
@mattimber Even J. Kanzius' own paper titled "Observations of polarised RF radiation catalysis of dissociation of H2ONaCl solutions" admits that the technology has a negative EROEI. With all due respect, not everything is a conspiracy. Helps to read background material before you pounce because it makes you look uneducated which I'm sure you are not.
How long before a Exxon or another giant corporation buys it and keeps it put away so that we're reliant on fossil fuels until it's too late? They killed the electric car among many other miracle technologies, they will kill this.
john Kanzius = THE MAN he pretty mutch cured cancer and made a new fuel out of salt water he shoul have gotten a novel prize for having such a great two use invention
Im from Erie PA, and my grandpa went to his hospital in Erie when he was diagnosed with colon cancer. Since then my grandpa has been the happy old guy he usually is.
no sean tan credulos, si esta persona invento realmente lo que dice quienes son los que se perjudican con su invento y partiendo de la base que muchos presidentes fueron asesinados y sus muertes encubiertas, no estamos adelante de un complot del poder para encubrir algo que puede ayudar a la humanidad y erradicar la pobreza o el petroleo es tan importante como para hacer desaparecer a alguien que quiere alludar a la humanidad.
a cambio combinado con los fabricantes autos, golpee las partes posteriores con el pie, rentabilidades, para tener ésos con el conocimiento ' silenced'. Wonderous, aunque, que algún día éste podría ser el futuro, entiendo su pessism, para alas, los E.E.U.U. Gov' t. e it' s ' Hedgemony, ' obstaculizaría los fundimentals de la ciencia.
Usted tiene un punto válido, senor y' el senorã, el problemo, es compañías petroleras grandes integradas con la última mafia que coludió la corrupción del nivel (a través del vigésimo siglo) con las compañías del combustible, con la multitud - cerró la puerta a los estudios científicos, que ' El Mob'
My mom was his nurse! he was very kind to her and invited us to his speech! one of the places he wants to do it is here, in fort myers florida with the lee memorial hospital group.he has already tested it on small animals(sorry animal lovers but this is helping humans here...get over it!) they injected cancer into bunnies and the machine 100% cured them! sadly, he died not too long ago. but his wonderful work will remain until it cures many diseases!
Great question. I think that John Kanzius is working with the Steven Greer & The Orion Project, but I'm not sure. You can check with them to see. You might also check out a similar device that Tom Valone invented (pretty different, but sort of similar) Go to the Integrity Research Instiute's website or Google: Photonic Rejuvenation Energizing Machine & Immunizing Electrification Radiator" Tom Valone's device is based on the Tesla and Rife technologies, and the Azure patent #6,217,604 "
Kanzius better not sell his invention to some corporation, especially to an oil or motor company that will just keep it in storage in order to protect their petroleum profits. He can build up his own company using his exclusive patent on this marvelous invention and let those greedy oil bastards run for their money or he can spread it all over the Net for all to use and screw those corporate & Mid East SOBs!
Not necessarily, somehow the modulated RF energy seems to be tuned to the NaCl crystalline structure thus acting as a pyzo transducer generating harmonics sympathetic to the H2O molecule, thus breaking the hydrogen bound at a very low cost in energy and producing lots of hydrogen to burn. We have to stop thinking in a linear symmetric "conservation of energy" fashion. So yes I think there is over-unity output involved here. Very efficient systems are often of resonant technology...
Just out of curiosity, what are you basing that claim on? I have been unable to find anything that indicates how much power is required to produce this effect, or how much is harvested from a given amount of fuel. I'd really like to know, but I can't seem to find the information anywhere.
I dont believe there's an "over unity" occurrence here. If it takes a certain amount of energy to fracture the water molecule & by this separation the hydrogen will produce more heat energy than what was required to fracture the water, then what we are seeing is the same occurrence as when we drill for oil. There's a certain amount of energy expended to drill & more energy is released via the oil than was used to get to it.
...and that's OK as long as the energy to produce the wave is generated by solar or some other renewable energy source. The gas can be stored, which equates to storing the solar, until needed.
You don't want to store HHO gas. It's way too volatile. Compressing it is also a bad idea. (BOOM!) You really want to use it on demand. A similar device like this can be seen in many hydroxy boosters now used to improve gas mileage for cars & trucks. You can also build an HHO generator that can create enough HHO gas from water to run a car or truck on and use no petroleum at all. Google: panacea paul zigouras to see an example of such a system.
A fascinating discovery - and one which might have some potential use - but hardly free power.
If you are putting 300 watts of energy in, you need to be getting AT LEAST 300 watts back out again to even "stand still" - and that assumes the transmitter is 100% efficient too.
With all these "scientists" on the job, I am surprised, we haven't been given the efficiency ratio - could it be that it isn't a magical over-unity device after all?
I agree, no over unity here. This could be a source of energy to replace oil. We could use solar to produce the electric for the process, then store & distribute in gas form. Solar isn't going to run out anytime soon.
Don't be so quick to dismiss over-unity & don't confuse efficiency with coefficient of performance (COP). Solar energy is a form of free energy, & contributes to the COP of an solar device. A fridge is an example of an over-unity device. Consider the quantum vacuum or radiant energy as an energy source (like solar is), then this contributes to a device's ability to be over-unity & make free energy.You're not creating energy, but merely grabbing it from nature & converting to usable energy.
Please explain how a fridge is an over-unity device. I hold that electrolysis is not over-unity. It is using a given amount of energy to crack the water molecule, which now has a high potential of energy in the HHO gas. Just like it takes a certain amount of energy to retrieve oil out of the ground so it can be usable. Using a rez frequency to crack water will increase the gas production, which will make that process viable for us to use & replace petroleum.
Check out the videos I have: "Water Fuel Cell by Xogen" (or see xogen (dot)ca. My schematic video (most popular on my channel) has a link to a PDF that shows a lot of sources. Also, there's plenty of alternative (conventional and cutting edge/free energy) at freeenergynow (dot) net. Also, Google search "Matt Imber" and you'll find a letter I wrote about this subject in the context of an energy plan to mitigate global warming.
generator is configured to generate an RF signal having a frequency of approximately 13.56 MHz.
Its from his patent guys.. try it.. But not sure what is the watts of that. I found that at least 600W, but if you look closer hi is placing his test tube between RF senders wich have quite big space between them. So wattage might be lot smaler.
This process is not at all like the Stanley Meyer process which places the water in an high voltage state, causing the water molecules to fall apart due to a lack of binding electrons. The Kanzius process excites the oxygen atom in the water with RF energy (13.561 MHz). The water molecule essentially spins itself apart. The charged sodium ions repel or attract the resultant atoms separating them enough to prevent reformation of the water molecule. The processes are completely different.
300 Watts in, and obviously not 300 Watts out. No free energy here. Google for a document titled "Observations of polarised RF radiation catalysis of dissociation of H2O-NaCl solutions" for more detailed information.
Yes any auto alternator should be able to produce 300 watts. The amount of gas he was producing was minimal for that input. Those using brute force electrolysis are getting better HHO output with 300W. It is a good idea though. A new method to explore. With the right refinements, who knows...
Ethanol can be made with solar (to heat the mash), or other "waste" material, can be used to burn & heat it. The wrong way to produce ethanol is to use petroleum or some other "fossel fuel".
Normally yes but this process has a lot of kinetic energy involved in it. All those H and O atoms flying around and bumping into water molecules and sodium and chlorine atoms cause them to vaporize into the gas mix which gives it some color.
RIP, John... you and your work will not be forgotten.
saalanc 2 weeks ago
how Ironic that he died of cancer :/
fubar66 3 months ago
so the point is ... we can run any house hold device off a car battery when we use a power converter .... the scam they killed John kanzius for is he stumbled on that which they were trying to hide.. water spliting at such a high rate it can run any generator to produe high voltage and some to spare
frank0067 3 months ago
@frank0067 Holy shit..... now he was assassinated? You've got to be joking. You have now convinced me you are delusional. He stumbled on technology that has been known about for years? You're right, no one before him though to use this technology to light on fire. Haha, of course they thought of it, but again, it's... not... economical...
It appears you are not willing to listen to logic, since I've said most of this stuff to you about four times each. And you come back with assassination...
bweazel 3 months ago
@frank0067 Ok, frank. Do you understand that this system requires an input of more energy than it gives back? Answer this very simple question for me. Do you understand that?
bweazel 3 months ago
@bweazel BOY you one of yhose people with their head stuck in the sand arent you.. you belive anything the media tells ya... i can tell by your answers...
John Kanzius is on video saying the very oposite what you said... he said it can replace the energy in the automobile... which BTW is heavery for no good reason whatso ever but to burn MORE OIL !.. c cant belive my eyes He had lukemia sure but he death had Nothing to do with it. but HEY another coincedence only for you.
WAKE UP !!
frank0067 3 months ago
@bweazel keep belive that bs quip... takes more than gives out... READ MY LIPS.. IT DOES NOT !! its a lie
look at ALL the stuff your car controls electrialcly .. including headlights tails lights blinkers windshield washers front and rear..foggers horn radio cdplayers air conditioning fuel pump fan heater power windows cab-lights cigerett lighters .. what else did i miss !!. and ALL comes off of the alternator puting out less than 14 volts .
you have gull to tell me all thats less than RWG??
frank0067 3 months ago
@frank0067 The inventor said it does. I think I'll take his word over yours. Go take your meds.
bweazel 3 months ago
@frank0067 What's your point? None of those really require much energy. Plus, that engine is being powered by gasoline, not salt water. This must be hard to accept for you, this many facts. Let it soak in over the night, see if you feel differently about it in the morning.
bweazel 3 months ago
@bweazel LOL you get more ridicoulous each time..... an alternator does not run on gasoline... LMAO
the belt from the engine turns it... another magic device maybe??
depending on the alternator but commonly they give out less than 14 volts... which is another scam in itself should be lot more.. and Kanzius even says you can use this to run cars on !!
what are REALLY trying to hide..really
frank0067 3 months ago
@frank0067 Never said it did. What I said was the engine is powered by gasoline. The alternator is powered by a belt attached to the engine. Not claiming to be an expert on cars, but it takes a real special idiot to behave as though gasoline does not indirectly power the alternator.
You are bat shit insane, lol ;) I'm done with ya. Have a nice life.
bweazel 3 months ago
@bweazel comon scense should show ya... a radio wave generator is same as any other device much less power needed even... yet your car can run a HTEAR - windshield wiper motor - fuel pump and lights and radio all at same time !
listen dont get frustrated... BIG Oi and auto is behind but not the top off of this BS supression
frank0067 3 months ago
@frank0067 You are a paranoid, delusional idiot, frank. You clearly have zero idea about anything, especially science or the fundamentals of it. Continuing this conversation with you would be a complete waste of my time, sorry. "a radio wave generator is same as any other device much less power needed even" You see what I mean? No one can argue with such persistent ignorance and idiocy (which looks willful on your part). Again, have a nice life, and stop wasting my time.
bweazel 3 months ago
@bweazel ya just as i thought a social sheep who follows others never understanding anything for yourself..
most folks who make a religion of their concept of science..i find have No idea what science even means ...
btw there are solar powered ham radios .. battery.. you name it.
its vey difficult to show someone that their long held perception of the world isnt the way it is at all and there are many who fall into that.
frank0067 3 months ago
@frank0067 I just found this on his Wikipedia page. I thought it might interest you. "Kanzius admitted that this process could not be considered an energy source, as more energy is used to produce the RF signal than can be obtained from the burning gas and stated in July 2007 that he never claimed his discovery would replace oil, asserting only that his discovery was 'thought provoking.'" (Ogden, Shannon (2007-07-05). "Salt Water Fuel". First Coast News.)
bweazel 3 months ago
@frank0067 As for your " the scam they killed John kanzius for" business, the man was diagnosed with leukemia in the late 90's before he even started working on this project, and underwent chemotherapy for many years. He died of pneumonia. He was not assassinated because he discovered some wild breakthrough that Big Oil is trying to keep under wraps. He seems to have been trying to extend his own life, and will end up helping thousands. Honestly, I think you need to seek medical attention, sir.
bweazel 3 months ago
bigger issue i see is saltwater in a car
xTheDeathSaintx 3 months ago
Guess who bought is invention ?
.
B.P
niceboy60 5 months ago
dont need much energy to make radio waves
frank0067 5 months ago
@frank0067 To have them at the intensity to cause this chain reaction, yes, you do. You need more energy than the reaction gives back in energy, thus, a wasteful form of energy. Not to mention that water vapor is the largest green house gas, for all those that may be climate change prone ;)
bweazel 3 months ago
@bweazel i thnk your quite wrong... what it gives back is much more than we see here...and what we even see here is something also not shown...steam engine which can provide more than enough power to make the power for a radio generator ...
btw its not the power which does this is the key square wave feqency
frank0067 3 months ago
@frank0067 No, it's not much more than you see here. It is a tiny flame produced by using high intensity radio waves to separate hydrogen atoms from water molecules. And what it gives back is the hydrogen gas, that is then lit on fire. This is a non economical way of producing fire. Simple as that, bro.
What you "think" really isn't important. You'll need to do more than just say "more is going on than we can see", yes, that's obvious, but what is it you think is going on here?
bweazel 3 months ago
@bweazel its nota tiny flame.. also thats only limited to the amount held in the flask..
who else has duplicated the project? whee do we se eothers doing the same thing ??
why did they take it .. for cancer research... and not disclose it again..
ya see whats going on dont ya? same ol supression
show me someone who also is splitting water with radio waves .
frank0067 3 months ago
@frank0067 It is a tiny flame. Ya, well the larger flask you have, the more energy that needs to go into it. Plenty of people have duplicated it. Again, it is not economical, and that's why no one does this on a large scale. Why? Because it is not a viable option for producing energy, just a neat science experiment.
No, no suppression. For about the twentieth time now, it... is... not... economical. Do you understand that? If this is so profitable, why don't you make one and save us all?
bweazel 3 months ago
@frank0067 Has anyone ever built his exact machine? No, but that doesn't mean the method isn't used to do thing like break down water molecules so people can breath under water in submarines, or in space. The Navy and NASA both use these methods. You keep acting like this is some new breakthrough, it's really not. It's old tech, that someone put a spin on. No one ever thought about lighting it on fire before, because they thought what's the point? Takes more energy than you get back.
bweazel 3 months ago
@bweazel Listen someone else is gonna buy that stuff your throwing around..but Not me... thats such a ridiculous answer... first... IT IS a viable solution ...it IS free energy even for goodness sakes. but i belive i already sted that.
The only saps who chirping out that ..takes More energy thanit puts out answer is the folks who are trying to hideing the invention, and there is a number of them.
i
frank0067 3 months ago
@frank0067 You must be a moron then, frank. If you can't understand that this method of creating energy gives you less energy back than it requires you put in, then you are an idiot. It is viable, sure, it is not economical or efficient or even necessary. If you get power from the wall outlet, what is the point of using that same wall outlet to power a machine to give you a different form of energy? There's no point at all.
Please, stop being so dumb.
bweazel 3 months ago
@bweazel LOL .. where do ya think the power in the OUTLET comes from.. the magic power fairy???
hahahah it is generated usualy with steam first in form of heat !
frank0067 3 months ago
@frank0067 That's exactly my point, sir. And where do you think the heat comes from? Magic heat fairies? No, it comes from coal (for the most part). So what you're saying here is: Let's dig up coal, burn it, so we can use a radio frequency generator to split water molecules and burn hydrogen, which gives us less energy back than the energy of burning coal.
Your idiocy is really starting to bother me, and you're over 40? That's just shameful, you should know better by your age.
bweazel 3 months ago
@frank0067 So what you are advocating is that we waste energy, to get energy. Where the fuck is your logic? Where else does logic like this apply in your life? Do you waste money to get less money back? Waste food to get less food back? Name me a single spot in your life where you spend more of something, knowing full well you will get less of that same thing back. Again, what's the point?
Tell me, frank. Do you think this motor could power the computer you're on right now? 1:58 Be honest.
bweazel 3 months ago
@bweazel thats just supressive double talk bs ... your understand ing of things comes throught this confority of supressivesness..
DO you know that Big oil and auto makes us pay highest price for gas because the veicle and engline is MADE to do just that.. weakeast sprk-plug made.. heaveny veilce timeing retarded.. liquid gas injection ...intake air choked .. ECU made to rat out better combustion and ratify that... Modelt T FORD 20- 25 mpg .. todat average car gets 15-20 mpg.. by design
frank0067 3 months ago
@frank0067 You're bordering on paranoid delusions, sir. My understanding of this particular scenario comes from common sense, which is: don't be wasteful. Using 2000 watts, to give you hardly 400 back is not a good way to get energy. Why you are trying to argue this with me, I have no idea. That should be pretty obvious to you that this is not a good way to get energy, since it requires another form of energy to break the bonds to make what you're seeing possible.
bweazel 3 months ago
@frank0067 This has very little to do with Big Oil. Since very little of our grid power comes from oil. Also, the Model T weighed about 1000 lbs. Modern cars weigh anywhere from 3000lbs up. The average MPG is higher than that too, so it looks like we're doing much better than the scenario you are trying to paint there.
bweazel 3 months ago
@frank0067 What part of using a 2000-watt radio generator is free? Do you realize how stupid and paranoid you are making yourself look here? I'm done going back and forth with you, if you can look at this video, and can think to yourself that this is "free" energy, you are an uneducated putz, and it's a poor investment to try to help you understand the world. Have a nice life, sir. Perhaps you should read a couple books, just a thought.
bweazel 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@frank0067 "steam engine which can provide more than enough power to make the power for a radio generator ..." Uh huh, and where do you get the energy to fire the steam turbine? Coal? Wood? Oil? Natural gas? It's got to come from some where.
"btw its not the power which does this is the key square wave feqency" It is the power that does this. More power is needed than this reaction gives back. Stop trying to make this more complex than it is.
bweazel 3 months ago
@frank0067 No, it is not much more than you see here. It's just that. Using a shit ton of radio waves to break down water. I like how you smart guys come on here behaving as though there is some secret use to this guys invention which he said cannot be used the way you are saying it can. Sorry. Like I told the last guy. Go take your meds.
bweazel 2 months ago
OK, so this sounds great, but... First, the cancer issue. Been there done that. This technique was investigated 30 years ago at the University of Arizona (and several associated universities). Second, the energy that he is putting into disassociating the hydrogen and oxygen in water is greater than the energy returned by burning it. Entropy always wins.
FreepWonk 6 months ago
@FreepWonk Have you seen the data from John Kanzius' research? If so, you can not make any claims about energy in vs. energy out. John Kanzius was never claiming over-unity in his device. However, you ARE wrong about entropy always winning. There is a loophole; dark energy and its entrainment in certain configurations of high voltage transducers creating the Casimir Effect. I suggest you watch my Moray King video.
mattimber 5 months ago
@FreepWonk YouTube search or Google search: "Water Fuel" via Zero-Point Energy, by Moray King"
mattimber 5 months ago
Don't let it go John!!! the oil companies will buy it, patent it and bury it. They've done that with electric cars, and they'll do it with your invention.
loganfry1 6 months ago
at the last setense i just think and byebye good idea..... another revoltionary idea going down the toilette for the greed of a few oil barons !
solunasunrise 6 months ago
@solunasunrise Greed of oil barons? I really don't think that has anything to do with it at all. Let's say I came to you with this idea, and I said hey solunasunrise, I have an idea for new "clean" energy, but the catch is that you'll have to pay more into this system, than the system will give you back in revenue. So it's going to end up being a black hole of money for you, and you will never receive a penny doing it. Would you buy it? Can I send the contract to your house? ;)
bweazel 3 months ago
so if you all start driving on this really quickly you might be able to combat the rising sea levels before it covers the road....
Astarkat 7 months ago
all the science doesn't matter. there will never be cheap energy. man is just too greedy.
nedmorlef 7 months ago
@nedmorlef It has nothing to do with man being greedy. Has everything to do with nature being difficult. As soon as you invent clean, truly renewable energy and you break the riddle that nature has put before us, let us know, until then, keep uneducated comments like that to yourself.
bweazel 3 months ago
HERE'S MY ANGRY COMMENT WITH LOTS OF FUCKS IN IT
leonard71 7 months ago
"It's the most abundant element on earth, water"
Alright then.
MisterScientist 7 months ago 6
Compared to traditional electrolysis:
Advantage: No electrodes to get dirty, efficiency doesn't degrade over time.
Disadvantage: Hydrogen, Oxygen, (possibly Sodium & Chlorine) need to be separated with this device. With traditional electrolysis, Hydrogen bubbles at the cathode, and Oxygen bubbles at the anode.
Can this be more efficient than the sulfur-iodine cycle? Will it find its niche in small scale production? Could this be combined with high-pressure electrolysis?
youcrackmeupdude 7 months ago
He would be better off claiming cold fusion. Might as well go whole hog if you are a fraud.
oracle2world 7 months ago
Wait does that mean we could blow up the oceans?
kenarnold2011 9 months ago
@kenarnold2011 With enough energy, you can blow up anything.
bweazel 9 months ago
Wait does that mean we could blow up the oceans?
kenarnold2011 9 months ago
where does the energy from the radio waves come from???
green17celtics 10 months ago
@green17celtics The wall outlet a.k.a. a coal fire and a steam turbine ;)
bweazel 9 months ago
hahah yeah wow thats amazing. But i can already see this NEVER hitting the public. i mean this video was uploaded 3 years ago...... who knows how long it was out there before that...... too bad people love petroleum and dont give a flying fuck enough to sacrifice.
REALtimeJERiCHO 10 months ago
running the machine.. on electricity.. neutralizes.. the result.. there is no perpetual motion machine.. on earth
rrmoh 10 months ago
If some big energy company does "buy up this invention" you can bet the general public will never see it again.
fenderflipper 10 months ago
@fenderflipper No one is buying it because it is not economically efficient. Why would want to spend money (energy) to get less money (energy) back? No one would, and that's exactly why your house doesn't run on one of these right now.
bweazel 9 months ago
@bweazel Storage and distribution. Storage: A solar powered home could use excess energy to create hydrogen during the day, and use the hydrogen at night or on cloudy days. Rechargeable batteries take more energy to charge than they put out, but people use them for their storage value. Distribution: A plant could use solar or wind energy to create hydrogen gas and pipe it out to customers like natural gas. No one is buying it because this method was just discovered.
youcrackmeupdude 7 months ago
@youcrackmeupdude If the solar energy is enough to power this process, then it is enough to power the home on it's own, most likely, and the whole hydrogen part is unnecessary. That's the whole point, to get this reaction, you need to have more energy to make the reaction, than the reaction gives you back in energy. It's a net loss, therefore, wasteful. The entire process is not economically feasible.
For example: It's possible to melt rock, but wouldn't you rather use wood for heat? ;)
bweazel 7 months ago
Uh huh.... where do you get the energy for the radio waves? Hmmmm?
bweazel 11 months ago 13
@bweazel if it is electricity it would be a really good recycling energy source. Because
Water>engine>dynamo>elictricity
Dxxchrisable 9 months ago
@Dxxchrisable This is a cute science experiment, but that's about all it is. It is not sustainable, nor does it net positive energy, it actually nets negative energy, so it takes more energy to get this reaction you're seeing, than the reaction is actually putting off.
bweazel 9 months ago
@bweazel well i totally agree with you but atleast were on to something right?!?!
Dxxchrisable 9 months ago
@bweazel I asked my self the same question. But it does make a difference, cause all you would need is electricity enough to make the combustion. And I bet that drains down the energy comsumption as well. So its a win win scenario. Im not an engineer, or anything. Just the best educated guess I can imagine.
antoniosalazar85 7 months ago
@bweazel Aside from the Sun, our planet is bombarded with radio waves from the moon, asteroids, other planets and other stars. They are everywhere.
EricShookRools 3 months ago
@EricShookRools Not in a high enough energy to power anything with though, which is exactly the point I was making. If radio waves worked the way you were behaving as though they do, there would be no need to plug in your radio or TV or anything else that receives a signal. Sure, they're everywhere, so are light waves, x-rays, gamma rays and the rest of the spectrum, it's a question of energy intensity though, not one of these waves merely being around us at all times.
bweazel 3 months ago
@EricShookRools Now, if you could find a way to convert normal energy into a higher intensity energy, without adding in any other energy, I'm sure lots of people would be very curious as to how you did that ;)
bweazel 3 months ago
@bweazel I don't wana spark you off again lol but this idea will work. Once the engine starts the radio wave generator will be powered by the engine.
clarkdef 2 months ago
@clarkdef Haha, well, I'll go with what the inventor of the machine said. And he said that it is not a viable energy source. His actual quote is on here a couple pages back, I think you should read it. Wrong, more energy is required to power the machine than the energy it gives back, but ok, I'll let you think you know what you're talking about.
bweazel 2 months ago
@bweazel Must use a lot of power, I have gotten a lawnmower which is 4hp to power my 54" tv. I think that the fuel could work or be viable if it could be made to not burn so hot so not a good idea to dismiss something you know little about. But yeah I would say that not being viable would be 1. freq not responding well within cyclinder. 2. flame burning too hot for use within engine.
clarkdef 2 months ago
@bweazel But nah don't agree with the powering it argument, a typical alternator uses about 2-4hp to run properly and is capable of producing over 2000watts
clarkdef 2 months ago
@clarkdef How can you all read the quote from the inventor himself, saying it is not an alternative to oil and it takes more power to run it than it gives you back in power, and still reply to me arguing against the inventor. It's ridiculous. I'll say it again, I will take the inventors word over yours any day of the week.
bweazel 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@clarkdef And in case you're too lazy: "Kanzius admitted that this process could not be considered an energy source, as more energy is used to produce the RF signal than can be obtained from the burning gas and stated in July 2007 that he never claimed his discovery would replace oil, asserting only that his discovery was 'thought provoking.'" (Ogden, Shannon (2007-07-05). "Salt Water Fuel". First Coast News.)
bweazel 2 months ago
He just happen to reach the end of his life expectancy too.
XgrownazzmanX2 1 year ago
I am really glad people are getting to see this and get an education in scientific discovery. If the machine takes more energy than it emits, well it ends up being a proof that hydrogen exists and nothing more. There are plenty of machines that do clever things but are not practical for everyday issues such as travel. Maybe some young scientist will be watching and use the idea to resolve an issue that is practical.
markallen200 1 year ago
Water isn't a element loooool
omarion2k 1 year ago
Why haven't I heard of this before?! O:
AleifrLeifrson 1 year ago
This isn't as amazing as it would seem. You can't violate the laws of thermodynamics, and this radio wave generator-for-hydrogen proves that. It uses high amounts of energy to produce those radio waves. It is still less energy intensive to use other methods of electrolysis for hydrogen technology. Other than the gold nanoparticles, there is no real innovation here. Sorry.
bobstevefrank123 1 year ago
@bobstevefrank123 The device he was using was really low power, dude. It ran off of a singe AC current. Plus you can burn all of it at once by charging a capacitor and using that as a source of power.
Did you know that the capacitor in a disposable camera, powered by a measly AAA generates enough electricity to emulate a single burst from a stungun? Some capacitors can melt the heads of screwdrivers. My uncle said that, and he has been in the business for a long time.
infamus15 7 months ago
Cracking water molecules and burning the hydrogen!!! Wow!! That's revolutionary!!! Someone call Obama!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
jpfist707 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy technology exists!But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Join the energy revolution!
Rread4549 1 year ago
Hilarious. What a crock of shit. As so many commenters here already state, the energy IN is more than the energy OUT therefore he is achieving NOTHING!
I', no chemist but I can do basic Mathematics :)
HitMeWithIt 1 year ago
@HitMeWithIt achieving nothing??? ...BOY i never seen someone so brain smacked as you man...
This is one of the greatest discoveries in our history !!
One thing that cures yes CURES cancer and KNock off oil and supressive energy cartels... while providing the answer to FREE energy .. ALL in one item !
frank0067 1 year ago
thats bullshit nikola tesla knew this shit years ago
HopelessReminder 1 year ago
There's so much bad reporting here it's laughable.
Oh look radio waves can kill cancer cells, really? mm I wonder where that idea came from....maybe from the research carried out by the medical proffession over the last 50-60 years......
Basically all that is happening is that the radio waves are absorbed by the impurites in the water,NaCl, MgCl etc. They get excited, they form elemental Mg & Na. These then oxidise ripping the O2 from the H20. This is exothermic chemistry and well known.
AmblinClearwater 1 year ago
@AmblinClearwater .. Wut?
badkiller2 1 year ago
You are a hero
tweakedmofo 1 year ago
Lol, 'this is the most abundant element in the world, water' Fail.
Fishstickification 1 year ago
Really? The energy required to generate the RF is far greater than what you'd have to produce the energy output. Bad reporting!
bcg7752 1 year ago
How much energy does it take to release the hydrogen? Does it take more or equal amount of energy to produce that effect, if it does then what's the advantage? Maybe someone can enlighten me.
LiveCamProfits 1 year ago
yeah the first Invent this thing is a Philippines hmmmmp
fods202 1 year ago
1:20 .. what is it ???
effedieffedi 1 year ago
I don't get why people get confused by stuff like this, the laws of thermodynamics say that more energy HAS TO be going into breaking the water apart initially than is coming from the flame this is no free energy, there is no such thing. Now, as for using it as a way of storing solar for an indefinite period, that makes more sense, but remember we have been able to do this same thing through electrolysis more efficiently for a VERY VERY Long time. Can't believe this hack news station ran this
Celestiallama 1 year ago
this is the oldest idea ever
ElPopularVale 1 year ago
where would you find radio waves of such high intensity? You would have to apply tons of energy to produce them.
maniacmobster 1 year ago
John Kanzius was brilliant
Jazzper79 1 year ago
i just tried this. put dense salt water into a microwave oven preferably a small sample and you'll be suprized!
rblackwell2771 1 year ago
Put in your hand and.... AHHH! OH MY GOD ITS ON FIRE
Xenophanessmith 1 year ago
Cure for cancer:
Dr. Gerson, Dr. Budwig, Dr. Kelley protocols.
Search : "The beautiful truth: movie on youtube.
Go to: w w w . gerson . org/ [remove spaces]
Google: Dr. Johanna Budwig
Go to: w w w . drkelley . com [remove spaces of course]
gigiontube 1 year ago
The world's water supply is finite. Why would this device be a good thing?
dzagama 2 years ago
@dzagama
For all practical purposes, consider water being an infinite commodity. Not in a million years could humans "burn" enough water to deplete the oceans. Also, water is free. Thats why its a good thing
rrwiest 2 years ago
When the HHO gas is burned, it turns right back into water. There is no casue for concern. There are millions of hosue sized comet chucks hitting earth weekly, healing the ozone, and adding more water to the planet anyway
mattimber 2 years ago
Infinite .....That is why its called a Water Cycle...at least they haven't destroyed that part of education.
That means once you car has finished with it then it goes back to the clouds and comes back down as rain. The problem with this is that is too good and put an end to this mass media farce that is global warming. RP2012
UTubeFreeMind 2 years ago
Manmade global warming is real. Air pollution is also real. The farce is the politicization of thse issues and the "solutions" to them (e.g. carbon tax), which don't address the problem. I like RP, but please don't use this page for his campaign.
mattimber 2 years ago
@mattimber yaaaaaaaaaaaawnnn. Global Warming is about as real as Santa Claus.
32GaugeSlug 11 months ago
@32GaugeSlug Global warming may not be real, but sending billions of dollars per year overseas certainly is. The globlal warming scam serves one good purpose, it will help get people off oil
2x2is22 10 months ago
@UTubeFreeMind wait are you saying you believe this will generate energy and global warming is not real or what? because this thing is just a cool way to do electrolysis it generates no power and global warming is real lol its a matter of how much we cause. which we release 100times the co2 of volcanoes and co2 absorbes infrared and the earth emit it. Also if we had no co2 or rather no green house effect earths temp would be closer to the moon or mars. idk how people argue against it.
Prontest 1 year ago
oil is far more finite then salt water. do u realize how much salt water there is relative to the amount of cars? it would prolong the inevitable but a great invention. I wonder what happens to the burnt water and if there are any environmental effects from it.
coolconman11 1 year ago
@dzagama The water is cheap and is found everywhere. Above all that, this water is evaporating and will continue the water cycle.
salehhamadeh1 1 year ago
This solves only half of the issue anyways, it would be great that we would stop raping the world of it's solidified carbon... but you still need energy to create the radiowaves, and it would still be a combustion vehicle anyways. Just because it's abundant doesn't mean should burn it, or anything for that matter.
discodenial 6 months ago
@discodenial There is an overunity scenario when dealing with high voltage and high frequencies. The energy is coming from the quantum level via the Casimir Effect and the reverse of this phenomenon, and by many other means usually involving the Tesla Switch. Rodin Coils and Hall Effect Transistors can also entrain this quantum energy available everywhere in the universe. It's been suppressed by TPTB to maintain their monopolies but it soon will change. You'll just have to trust me :-)
mattimber 6 months ago
@mattimber The energy is coming from the theoretical quantum level? Haha, are you sure it's not coming from the breaking of the water molecules and the burning of hydrogen? I think it's safe to say that the energy is coming from the chemical and atomic level.
bweazel 3 months ago
I dunno, if this was discovered over a year ago I think this technology would be refined enough to have been put to use in a practical application that would be common by now.
rrwiest 2 years ago
Yes, that is a typical response from folks who discover that they've been lied to about science and things like free energy supression and cancer cures might exist (e.g. Dr.'s Riech, Rife, Tesla, & John Kanzius). Look up Cognitive Dissonance. Free energy and cancer cure is possible and has been supressed going back 100 years. Google "PES Suppression" and see what I mean.
mattimber 2 years ago
@mattimber Even J. Kanzius' own paper titled "Observations of polarised RF radiation catalysis of dissociation of H2ONaCl solutions" admits that the technology has a negative EROEI. With all due respect, not everything is a conspiracy. Helps to read background material before you pounce because it makes you look uneducated which I'm sure you are not.
yogiudo 1 year ago
@mattimber Yep. It's all about control.
"A man with power is afraid to lose it."
infamus15 7 months ago
How long before a Exxon or another giant corporation buys it and keeps it put away so that we're reliant on fossil fuels until it's too late? They killed the electric car among many other miracle technologies, they will kill this.
rockstar0725 2 years ago
Legend
cleancut05 2 years ago
its not "burning" water, its allready burned. the water just acts as a battery, google for "waterfuel cell"
akademiker23 2 years ago
I heard about this idea years ago. When will we get it?
RegressLess 2 years ago
john Kanzius = THE MAN he pretty mutch cured cancer and made a new fuel out of salt water he shoul have gotten a novel prize for having such a great two use invention
TheJizmister 2 years ago
he will...
estvnsal 2 years ago
Im from Erie PA, and my grandpa went to his hospital in Erie when he was diagnosed with colon cancer. Since then my grandpa has been the happy old guy he usually is.
SilentSniperTX3 2 years ago
please i write in spanish
no sean tan credulos, si esta persona invento realmente lo que dice quienes son los que se perjudican con su invento y partiendo de la base que muchos presidentes fueron asesinados y sus muertes encubiertas, no estamos adelante de un complot del poder para encubrir algo que puede ayudar a la humanidad y erradicar la pobreza o el petroleo es tan importante como para hacer desaparecer a alguien que quiere alludar a la humanidad.
martidelchola2 2 years ago
a cambio combinado con los fabricantes autos, golpee las partes posteriores con el pie, rentabilidades, para tener ésos con el conocimiento ' silenced'. Wonderous, aunque, que algún día éste podría ser el futuro, entiendo su pessism, para alas, los E.E.U.U. Gov' t. e it' s ' Hedgemony, ' obstaculizaría los fundimentals de la ciencia.
Mace713 2 years ago
Usted tiene un punto válido, senor y' el senorã, el problemo, es compañías petroleras grandes integradas con la última mafia que coludió la corrupción del nivel (a través del vigésimo siglo) con las compañías del combustible, con la multitud - cerró la puerta a los estudios científicos, que ' El Mob'
Mace713 2 years ago
My mom was his nurse! he was very kind to her and invited us to his speech! one of the places he wants to do it is here, in fort myers florida with the lee memorial hospital group.he has already tested it on small animals(sorry animal lovers but this is helping humans here...get over it!) they injected cancer into bunnies and the machine 100% cured them! sadly, he died not too long ago. but his wonderful work will remain until it cures many diseases!
marshmallowwoman 2 years ago
RIP
goeleet 2 years ago
Any one know where is John Kanzius'S invention applied (hospitals,country and city ) and address
please I need it as soon as possible please
E3O0YY 3 years ago
Great question. I think that John Kanzius is working with the Steven Greer & The Orion Project, but I'm not sure. You can check with them to see. You might also check out a similar device that Tom Valone invented (pretty different, but sort of similar) Go to the Integrity Research Instiute's website or Google: Photonic Rejuvenation Energizing Machine & Immunizing Electrification Radiator" Tom Valone's device is based on the Tesla and Rife technologies, and the Azure patent #6,217,604 "
mattimber 3 years ago
john kanzius has almost 18 days that has died...i think this is a case that should be investigated but drug business should not let it be...
eterntony 3 years ago
That's sad news.
R.I.P. John Kanzius.
I recall reading somewhere he had cancer and was trying to use his device to help treat it.
mattimber 3 years ago
Check out the latest comment! The Fort Myers Florida Lee Memorial Hospital Group was aparently funding and experimenting with the Kanzius device!
mattimber 2 years ago
Kanzius better not sell his invention to some corporation, especially to an oil or motor company that will just keep it in storage in order to protect their petroleum profits. He can build up his own company using his exclusive patent on this marvelous invention and let those greedy oil bastards run for their money or he can spread it all over the Net for all to use and screw those corporate & Mid East SOBs!
lovelyirene2001 3 years ago
Truth is his cure for cancer has more potential than this discovery. It takes more energy to create the flame than the flame actually produces.
policeman1313 3 years ago
Not necessarily, somehow the modulated RF energy seems to be tuned to the NaCl crystalline structure thus acting as a pyzo transducer generating harmonics sympathetic to the H2O molecule, thus breaking the hydrogen bound at a very low cost in energy and producing lots of hydrogen to burn. We have to stop thinking in a linear symmetric "conservation of energy" fashion. So yes I think there is over-unity output involved here. Very efficient systems are often of resonant technology...
LordTiahuanaco 3 years ago 2
Just out of curiosity, what are you basing that claim on? I have been unable to find anything that indicates how much power is required to produce this effect, or how much is harvested from a given amount of fuel. I'd really like to know, but I can't seem to find the information anywhere.
ScreminFlea 3 years ago
Think I read something on wikipedia about it. Don't remember exactly, sorry.
policeman1313 3 years ago
I dont believe there's an "over unity" occurrence here. If it takes a certain amount of energy to fracture the water molecule & by this separation the hydrogen will produce more heat energy than what was required to fracture the water, then what we are seeing is the same occurrence as when we drill for oil. There's a certain amount of energy expended to drill & more energy is released via the oil than was used to get to it.
Alcyone53 3 years ago
...and that's OK as long as the energy to produce the wave is generated by solar or some other renewable energy source. The gas can be stored, which equates to storing the solar, until needed.
Alcyone53 3 years ago
You don't want to store HHO gas. It's way too volatile. Compressing it is also a bad idea. (BOOM!) You really want to use it on demand. A similar device like this can be seen in many hydroxy boosters now used to improve gas mileage for cars & trucks. You can also build an HHO generator that can create enough HHO gas from water to run a car or truck on and use no petroleum at all. Google: panacea paul zigouras to see an example of such a system.
mattimber 3 years ago
NIce vid guy
Englanish29 3 years ago
A fascinating discovery - and one which might have some potential use - but hardly free power.
If you are putting 300 watts of energy in, you need to be getting AT LEAST 300 watts back out again to even "stand still" - and that assumes the transmitter is 100% efficient too.
With all these "scientists" on the job, I am surprised, we haven't been given the efficiency ratio - could it be that it isn't a magical over-unity device after all?
As I say, impressive but....
guymark 3 years ago 2
I agree, no over unity here. This could be a source of energy to replace oil. We could use solar to produce the electric for the process, then store & distribute in gas form. Solar isn't going to run out anytime soon.
Alcyone53 3 years ago
Don't be so quick to dismiss over-unity & don't confuse efficiency with coefficient of performance (COP). Solar energy is a form of free energy, & contributes to the COP of an solar device. A fridge is an example of an over-unity device. Consider the quantum vacuum or radiant energy as an energy source (like solar is), then this contributes to a device's ability to be over-unity & make free energy.You're not creating energy, but merely grabbing it from nature & converting to usable energy.
mattimber 3 years ago
Please explain how a fridge is an over-unity device. I hold that electrolysis is not over-unity. It is using a given amount of energy to crack the water molecule, which now has a high potential of energy in the HHO gas. Just like it takes a certain amount of energy to retrieve oil out of the ground so it can be usable. Using a rez frequency to crack water will increase the gas production, which will make that process viable for us to use & replace petroleum.
Alcyone53 3 years ago
im doing research and want to know a new source of alternative energy that i can present to my resoure teacher
Shootermaster540 3 years ago
Check out the videos I have: "Water Fuel Cell by Xogen" (or see xogen (dot)ca. My schematic video (most popular on my channel) has a link to a PDF that shows a lot of sources. Also, there's plenty of alternative (conventional and cutting edge/free energy) at freeenergynow (dot) net. Also, Google search "Matt Imber" and you'll find a letter I wrote about this subject in the context of an energy plan to mitigate global warming.
mattimber 3 years ago
generator is configured to generate an RF signal having a frequency of approximately 13.56 MHz.
Its from his patent guys.. try it.. But not sure what is the watts of that. I found that at least 600W, but if you look closer hi is placing his test tube between RF senders wich have quite big space between them. So wattage might be lot smaler.
edkins1 3 years ago
This process is not at all like the Stanley Meyer process which places the water in an high voltage state, causing the water molecules to fall apart due to a lack of binding electrons. The Kanzius process excites the oxygen atom in the water with RF energy (13.561 MHz). The water molecule essentially spins itself apart. The charged sodium ions repel or attract the resultant atoms separating them enough to prevent reformation of the water molecule. The processes are completely different.
cuke8466 3 years ago
Exactly-- what is the power input into the radio transmitter, and how much energy is the transmitter using as opposed to producing?
Tell me that and then maybe we can be impressed, otherwise it is like the ethanol catch 22- you need to burn fuel to make the ethanol too.
xykor2 3 years ago
300 Watts in, and obviously not 300 Watts out. No free energy here. Google for a document titled "Observations of polarised RF radiation catalysis of dissociation of H2O-NaCl solutions" for more detailed information.
cuke8466 3 years ago
300wats are ok to produce it by car. See, your car is using light bolbs 100w each :)) And that energy been wasted away, mate.
edkins1 3 years ago
Yes any auto alternator should be able to produce 300 watts. The amount of gas he was producing was minimal for that input. Those using brute force electrolysis are getting better HHO output with 300W. It is a good idea though. A new method to explore. With the right refinements, who knows...
cuke8466 3 years ago
Ethanol can be made with solar (to heat the mash), or other "waste" material, can be used to burn & heat it. The wrong way to produce ethanol is to use petroleum or some other "fossel fuel".
Alcyone53 3 years ago
and how much energy is being put into the radio transmitter? eh?
mandowarrior123 3 years ago
Good question...
y0uturd 3 years ago
Doesn't hydrogen burn with a colourless flame?
quintena 3 years ago
and what about salt?
mandowarrior123 3 years ago
Normally yes but this process has a lot of kinetic energy involved in it. All those H and O atoms flying around and bumping into water molecules and sodium and chlorine atoms cause them to vaporize into the gas mix which gives it some color.
cuke8466 3 years ago
whats that frequency
theoneagain 3 years ago
13.561 MHz. The Nuclear Magnetic Resonant frequency of Oxygen.
cuke8466 3 years ago
How much does the electricity cost? Norway has a hydrogen fuel initiative. You could sell your idea to them.
tomhaley52 3 years ago
Wow. grate car power! muhahahaha!
rwmtiger 3 years ago
I am sure the oil companies are planning a takedown of his idea at this very moment. They suck!
JOEYCRAXMAN 3 years ago 2