Added: 2 years ago
From: RepublicanSenators
Views: 2,488
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (50)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • omfg, Sotomayor is a joke. just answer the damn questions!

  • Sign me up to be a supreme court justice. I can sit there and say I CAN'T ANSWER THAT, with the best of them. The supreme court should follow the US CONSTITUTION to the GODDAMN letter. No ifs, ands, or buts.

  • Abolish the Bill of Rights, rights of the people cannot be determined and restricted to a piece of paper, but by common law and common sense. If a person believes that he has a right to bear arm, so be it as long as he does not harm others. If he does, that is a separate matter.

  • ntn1987

    you're completely delusional.

  • @Diatonic135 Ya no shit.I didn't even know where to start with that kid. lol 

  • ntn1987...common sense tells us that we learn more as we grow ("older but wiser") and common sense also tells us that we become more resistant to changing our thinking as we grow ("can't teach old dog new tricks"). The only finality in common sense is when it is interpreted by one party - a king, a dictator, or a simple majority. And in most of those cases, "common" would be a poor description of the reasoning.

  • I think the most consistent human trait

    is hypocrisy. Senator Coburn is no

    exception. The GOP is little more

    than a lie machine that is has corrupted

    intelligent politcal discourse in the U.S for

    at least 40 years. The veil has been lifted

    and the GOP is choking on its own lies.

    It is really quite a spectacle.

  • @Pilgrim812 And dems don't lie? They been on a roll lately. Vote independent. Or at least don't put a group down by the actions of some. They will do what it takes then self interest takes over. It happens when either party is in. Bush now Obama all the same just puppets for the elite and world banks. BUt between the two I'm going to the republicans and independent where I can.

  • @justinsaneok To answer your question, they all lie, or at least

    mislead. Who you vote for is your right. My personal circumstances cause me

    to view the GOP in a particularly negative light as the culture wars have defined

    us politically for the last 25 years. I have no love for the democrats as I have

    watched them play a game to bait gay voters to get elected, and then back

    off from their promises once elected. I am digusted with our political process

    in total. We have only the courts.

  • This cow lady hates America, denies the rights of the most helpless, and would allow Obama brownshirts to eminent domain my home and property, while not allowing me the luxury of armed resistance. All Americans with mexican heritage should be ashamed of this cow lady. I know that I am.

  • This asshole Coburn said to Sonya Sotomayor: You got some spaaan'n to do! What an idiot!

  • Sotomayor is either trying to cover up or totally out of her depth.

  • 2:36 She loves to avoid the issues!!! She has no excuse NOT to answer the question!!! She has proven so far to be the WORST pick for a judge of the highest court in the land and it's a shame to see someone like this sorry excuse for a judge holding a position on the supreme court!!!

  • Avoids the issue, she came right out and talked about Planned Parenthood v. Casey. That didn't sound like avoiding the question and she NEVER answers in the abstract.

  • What she said was NOT the answer!! She didn't even ANSWER his question!! She totally avoided the issue and she is sitting there saying she doesn't know the state law when she is running for the highest court in the land?? THAT'S PATHETIC!!! And she goes in and swears to uphold the Constitution but yet she is a huge anti-gun radical!! Well guess what? The 2nd Amendment is part of the constitution!! That grants us the right to keep and bear arms!!

  • OMG, Every single time a Democrat gets in to office the right wingers think that the government will be knocking down your door to take your guns away. Do you know this attifude is put out there for the NRA to make money? Let me know in 3 years how this administration changed the 2nd amenment. Truly laughable. If you have watched ANY of the Supreme Court nomination interogations, you would know they can not directly answer certain questions because they might be asked them if they are nominated.

  • Well then you are NOT paying attention whatsoever!! Sotomayor has a HUGE RECORD of going against the 2nd Amendment!!

  • A person who does NOT agree with the Constitution has NO place on the Supreme Court or anywhere in America for that matter!!!!!

  • she holds her cards close, let's hope she isn't an immoral pig even though she is so intent on keeping that possibility available.

  • Everyone that this president has offered up seems to be the worst of a radical. I am sure anyone can find exceptions to my statement however it is generally true.

  • Comment removed

  • Lost in all this is the waste of money the DNC poured into her make up and wardrobe. Jesus after 5 hours in the makeup chair she is still one ugly cow.

  • All things considered circus or no circus she is going in thankfully. If we could only get Scalia to retire...

  • jbosso79 --> First of all, look at all the previous court nominations and then comment on how potential judges evade questions due to the fact that these issues could actually arise in the S. Court. Abortion and bear arms is obviously controversial and most likely will be seen in the Court at some time. Also, look into what Roe v. wade said as it seems that you have your facts wrong.

  • She has no business as a nominee to the supreme court. The ruling for Roe-vs-Wade was based on the arguement that "we don't know when life begins" and if it were later determined when life begins then the issue would have to reconsidered. Yet, she can't even answer if new findings from new techologies should be considered with regard to Roe-vs-Wade. She can't even say if we have a right to bear arms in self-defense?!?! what the...! Seriously? what an idiot.

  • Roe-vs-Wade was not based upon the courts opinion of "where life begins" that is to say they were not ambivalent. The ruling stated that until the point of fetal viability it was an issue of privacy. It is a strange ruling which was not backed by legal precedence. In my opinion understanding (or what little understanding) of the court system had I been arguing for the plantiff I should not have used the privacy argument.

  • Only a liberal could support the Sotomayor's "non-answer" to the question, "Do I have the right to personal self-defense?" The only answer is absolutely YES!

    And to "mistersumthing" -- careful on your Sarah Palin remarks -- she knows how to defend herself. So if you see her ... RUN. I suspect that you would.

  • She hasn't even read the Constitution.

  • I don't think the Senator understands Judicial process. She isn't dodging she is attempting to explain due process. He isn't getting it. He is obviously intelligent but he over simplifies a complex process. Which without a law degree it would be strange if he did.

  • daniel01141975, she should be able to answer the question, "do I have a right to self-defense?". She says, "I can't think of a case" for crying out loud. He didn't ask for a case, he asked for her "personal opinion." It isn't an "abstract question." This is a no-brainer. she is clearly an idiot.

  • You think a supreme court justice should base rulings on personal opinion?

  • This lady should have never even come close to being nominated. It is the complete politicizing and political protectionsizm at play here. Obama is trying to stack the court with libs so that he can push his anti American agenda.

  • He's neither thick nor sidestepping. He's questioning her in a respectful, gentlemanly way. Something most liberals don't recognize nor understand. He's also trying to make sure that all those that watch it can understand the simplicity of the horror of abortion.

  • 21 weeks is 147 days, not 142.

  • the problem is, you don't always have a right to self defense. If she said yes, she'd be wrong. Life and the law are more complicated than that.

    OR, yes, she's insane and thinks we have no right to defend ourselves.

    Obviously both are reasonable interpretations of that exchange, especially if you be trollin

  • "I'm trying to think of a case where..."

    He asked YOU a very straightforward question. "Do I have a right to self-defense?" There is no reason why a straightforward answer.

    Any sane person would say "YES."  WTF is this woman's problem? The only conclusion is that she does NOT believe we have a right to self-defense, but that we are all supposed to wait for the government's hired goons to come save us.

    When seconds count, the police are only minutes away.

    Fuck that, and fuck her.

  • he's not asking her questions that would pertain to her job. you can ask her what she'd do as a supreme court justice and expect an answer. you can't ask her a question about something peripheral to her job (the answer to which would likely be damaging) and expect her to give you anything other than "I can only tell you what the Supreme Court said." Precedent's a bitch.

  • Mistersumthing, who made you the judge of someone's intelligence? Tom Coburn is an obstetrician and certainly knows what he's talking about. Sotomayor is using double talk and avoiding the questions. Apparently, like BO, they are "above her pay grade". Anyone who thinks that judges should make policy should NOT be on the Supreme Court.

  • i have a right to base an opinion, based on his line of questioning. he's thick - just because you're a doctor doesn't mean you can't be thick. It's clear he doesn't understand the basic concepts of how law is applied, but trying to trip her up. he's thick. if you don't see that, you're probably thick too

  • They're both intelligent. She is more versed in the intricacies of the law -- and he is trying to trip her up - they are both doing their jobs, and are both good at what they do.

  • I think she is the one sidestepping his sound questions there chief.

  • its not sidestepping. its called being diplomatic, because the reality is this is just a confirmation hearing but they're turning it into a political circus because they want her to say something they can use against her. you'd do the same thing if you wanted the job.

  • You are calling people "knobs" and you think others are "thick"? Please! Learn English!

  • with a name like "SarahPalinisAmazing" you have very little intellectual highground to preach to me about intelligence or grasp of the english language. "knobs" and "thick" come from a section of the english language called "colloquialisms". Look it up Sarah, goshdarn it you betcha, you'll love it

  • I am proud to have Tom Coburn representing myself and my state. Great job Dr. Coburn.

    Sotomayor should NOT be allowed to represent this country. She would just be another czar for Obama.

  • Is this Dr. Coburn as in Medical Doctor?

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more