I don't know why people get so angered up in the comments. Even if people say stupid things in the comments, at the end of the day if you fight back-who are you fighting with? Probably someone who just wanted to get you angry.
I I think the quality of Sk'a work is uneven, true, but at times his work does rival other celebrated writers. He uses philosophy, symbology, etc in many of his writings. Not many people are aware that he wrote The Shawshank Redemption which is an excellent movie as well as a novella. I'm a big fan of Steinbeck but SK's book sit comfortably on my shelves by his. I think his book on writing was excellent and generous and also a great memoir. Read Misery and tell me that it isn't a great book.
King has been writing longer than I've been alive, lol. My personal favorites include: 1. Bag of Bones, 2. Desperation, 3. Duma Key, 4. Pet Sematary, 5. Insomnia.
I haven't read his juggernauts, though, such as The Stand and It; these are just from the 12 I've read.
Everyones entitled to there own opinion but if you describe SK work as dull you obviously have never read any of his work. I implore you, thatbadass, to read "The Stand" and then say that King has no style. Unless you have actually read his work to criticizing a literary great is something a moronic fucking idiot would do.
It is obvious to me that you have forgotten the face of your father.
Well put godling...100 Rolands agree. and a little advice for tha"dumb"ass...quit watching american idol and listening to myspace bands...David, kill.
But just to clarify one thing, when you say 'literary great', are you comparing him to literary giants like John Steinback, Jack Kerouac, Ernest Hemingway, Charles Dickens and others? Right...
No style? Do understand that Stephen King won multiple rewards. His books may not have "boomed" like Twilight, but in another year, people will forget about Twilight just as they have with many other books such as Harry Potter. Yet, people will always be reading Stephen King books.
Now, understand that you condemn Stephen King of having no style only because he spoke his opinion and you did not agree. That is pathetic as I am sure you never read a book of his. Don't be a dumb twili.
Fuck you idiot, Stephen King is a good author, but people haven't forgotten Harry Potter. The sixth film has made 917 mil, the highest of any 2009 movie.
Stephen King is not a great writer? Look at his list of books and stories and tell me you've never heard of at least half of them. Writing isn't just about the execution, it's about the reslult. One person's opinion, (such as your own) doesn't match up against millions. Oh, and by the way, The Dark Tower series, was genious.
I've read It, Desperation, The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon, Dreamcatcher, and The Stand they were all genius and there prbuly wont be another author like him for a long time.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I recently read Wolves of the Calla. That is the lowestcrappieceofgarabage one can ever produce. I understand piling up scum for 350 pages like Patterosn or Kootz do, but for 800, wow. The guy hit you in that accident mr. SK and he surely hit u hard, didn't he ? whatta pathetic mind of a so called writer.Only in america. This shallow idiot wouldn't be able to type at the front desk of any hotel in europe, not to mention latin america or india.PUUUUKE!!!
Did you even read the first of the dark towers? Because you sound like your full of shit. anyone thats ever read those know they are fucking great. your a sorry critic, no real fight with what you said. just a bunch of bull. you go write a better book asshole!!!
let me tell u about king .If 1 would get into a car accident and lose 90 % of his brain due to it, one would still be able to write better book than almost any of SK's books . the great science of metaphysic wouldn't be able to explain how such a vomit as "Wolves of the Calla" could be laid in print and through all 800 sorry ass pages.
of course u r an idiot.The idiot.just for praising SK as one great writer.Another thing, u r stupid for not using wikipedia where tells u who danielle steel is...She sold 550 milion copies of her books which is 200 milion above SK ( 350 milion)..and yes, more movies than SK after her books ( 23 )..idiot!!!!
For people never heard of Celine or Beckett, punctuation is what it is, as well as writers like SK to venerate in front of fools. But then again, of course that someone of a "dumbass" language would never even hear of Celine, less to read him or follow.Leo Tolstoy once fairly defined what art iss and most of it he recycled into a strong group of art imitations. That concerned even Zola and Wagner. For SK I am not sure that he would find anything except his books being an unpleasant toilet paper.
Are these people really arguing on who's the best author? If you look the books, read 'em! If you don't, then don't! That's that. No author is better than any author in fact. But if you want to think one is better than the other, that's your opinion. Let somebody else think differently on the matter. I personally LOVE Stephen King's work, but I don't go around criticizing everybody who doesn't. Get over it. People have different opinion, people. That's why books sell. People like them.
u r a moron.U know nothing about literature..NADA!!! u said "no author is better than any author in fact ". You r out of your mind. What that means, that James Patterson is better author than William Faulkner ? That Janet Evanovich is better than Luis Ferdinand Celine? oh yes, who's Celine, right ?
FUCK OFF!!! go watch them reality shows, u moron...
You don't know anything about the English language. Why should we believe you know anything about literature. "u r a moron"? "U know nothing"? "You r out of your mind"? "watch them reality shows, u moron..."?
stupid idiot..Danielle Steel sells more than anyone..three times more than Sk, so what that makes her, a great writer..a garbage assembler, exactly what she is...
One of the keys of sellig a lot of books - don't be too good. You don't get rich from writing for people who look for something really artful and original. It's the Kiss-principle: keep it simple and stupid. No matter with what kind of entertainment you try to get rich - you'll only archive your goal, if you can mobilize the biggest of the hidden reserves: the idiots.
i agree to make money this is true, but ideas are your children and how could you ever do such an injustice to your children as not make them the best possible?
Your a fucking idiot. Your obviously a fucking bloody idiot. If SK's works are so bad why have they sold more copies then you can even count to you fucking prick. Also one more thing what have you done in your life worth mentioning. Wait whats that o yes nothing! Sk has all the writing sucess in the world when you have nothing yet your critazizing him! You haven't done a thing in your life worth mentioning you Quack!
question : if, as u idiot said, SK is a genius then let me ask u fairly...what is Jose Saramago then? a fusion between spinoza and christ ?...or what is faulkner or toni morrison then ? crossover between budha and kant ? what's wrong with u people..serious literature is like bach or mozart or sibelius...SK is justin timberlake...
MrtvaPriroda that's just YOU not liking SK...And just cause he hasnt gotten a nobel prize for literature (like Faulkner and Morisson that you mentioned ) doesn't mean that he isn't a great writer. I bet you anything that your children will be taught SK in literature in the future, and he'll be refered to among the classics come 30 years time.
nobel prize!!? r u serious!!? well, of course he is not in the bracket for the nobel..why? cause he is not good enough.and he is a good writer , but what I am fighting here is a bullshit of many idiots saying how SK is "the best writer".while garcia is living, while Toni Morrison is living, while Naipaul and Saramago are among living!!!it is like saying that bulgarian basketball team is more skillful than Boston Celtics and all that garbage statement just because one likes Bulgaria.
i quote what you just wrote "well, of course he is not in the bracket for the nobel..why?cause he is not good enough"
that's about the stupides comment i have ever read.what makes someone a better writer than another? and why should horror or science fiction not be considered as serious as other more "serious" types of writing?
Lisey' story...awful book...like 95% of king's novels....this guy writes so bad , he wouldn't be able to find his fitting place in american litarature not even as changing post menstrual tampons for toni morrison...
then why the h.e.double hockey sticks are you looking at posts about him? just to hiss hate at fans? get a life. SK is a author genius...like a wine his work gets better and better with time
Stephen King...few half sane books..most of it VOMIT...no one is going to memorise this dude 30 years from now....just watch...same garbage as Patterson or Koontz...a few points better thou...
He's one of those authors that says that his books are like his children and he hates having to choose between them. HOWEVER, he has stated on a couple of occasions that "The Reach" is his short story he likes the most.
31193JaH: THANK YOU! You are the first person to catch this. Thanks!! And to think, I actually did proof-reading for a publshing company years back for a while.
I don't know why people get so angered up in the comments. Even if people say stupid things in the comments, at the end of the day if you fight back-who are you fighting with? Probably someone who just wanted to get you angry.
UnParapluieBleu 1 year ago
I I think the quality of Sk'a work is uneven, true, but at times his work does rival other celebrated writers. He uses philosophy, symbology, etc in many of his writings. Not many people are aware that he wrote The Shawshank Redemption which is an excellent movie as well as a novella. I'm a big fan of Steinbeck but SK's book sit comfortably on my shelves by his. I think his book on writing was excellent and generous and also a great memoir. Read Misery and tell me that it isn't a great book.
krobinson95 1 year ago
King has been writing longer than I've been alive, lol. My personal favorites include: 1. Bag of Bones, 2. Desperation, 3. Duma Key, 4. Pet Sematary, 5. Insomnia.
I haven't read his juggernauts, though, such as The Stand and It; these are just from the 12 I've read.
RullyisJRM 2 years ago
I´ll read cell :D
bloodyhetza 2 years ago
Love Stephen King. Favorite author. I'll be reading "Dreamcatcher" soon. :)
jrmmf 2 years ago
im reading thinner
squidwardandspongbob 2 years ago
im reading DUMA KEY ....
TheBookWorld 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Stephen King is such a dull and egotistical writer. Listen to him talk about his new book in this short interview.
Stephen King seems to have cornered the market when it comes to writing fiction with absolutely NO STYLE!
thadbadass 3 years ago
Everyones entitled to there own opinion but if you describe SK work as dull you obviously have never read any of his work. I implore you, thatbadass, to read "The Stand" and then say that King has no style. Unless you have actually read his work to criticizing a literary great is something a moronic fucking idiot would do.
It is obvious to me that you have forgotten the face of your father.
godling666 3 years ago 4
Well put godling...100 Rolands agree. and a little advice for tha"dumb"ass...quit watching american idol and listening to myspace bands...David, kill.
dodgingasteroids 2 years ago
OK, I'll read "The Stand" and get back to you.
But just to clarify one thing, when you say 'literary great', are you comparing him to literary giants like John Steinback, Jack Kerouac, Ernest Hemingway, Charles Dickens and others? Right...
thadbadass 2 years ago
Dull???? maybe your just too stupid that everything for you is dull
playmakerzam 3 years ago
No style? Do understand that Stephen King won multiple rewards. His books may not have "boomed" like Twilight, but in another year, people will forget about Twilight just as they have with many other books such as Harry Potter. Yet, people will always be reading Stephen King books.
Now, understand that you condemn Stephen King of having no style only because he spoke his opinion and you did not agree. That is pathetic as I am sure you never read a book of his. Don't be a dumb twili.
NoNameC68 2 years ago
Fuck you idiot, Stephen King is a good author, but people haven't forgotten Harry Potter. The sixth film has made 917 mil, the highest of any 2009 movie.
ZeldaMarioHarry8 2 years ago
Stephen King is not a great writer? Look at his list of books and stories and tell me you've never heard of at least half of them. Writing isn't just about the execution, it's about the reslult. One person's opinion, (such as your own) doesn't match up against millions. Oh, and by the way, The Dark Tower series, was genious.
kaschap28 3 years ago 2
Desperation, Regulators, Bag of Bones.... all GENIUS!
askmisscris 3 years ago
I've read It, Desperation, The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon, Dreamcatcher, and The Stand they were all genius and there prbuly wont be another author like him for a long time.
kxkid661 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I recently read Wolves of the Calla. That is the lowestcrappieceofgarabage one can ever produce. I understand piling up scum for 350 pages like Patterosn or Kootz do, but for 800, wow. The guy hit you in that accident mr. SK and he surely hit u hard, didn't he ? whatta pathetic mind of a so called writer.Only in america. This shallow idiot wouldn't be able to type at the front desk of any hotel in europe, not to mention latin america or india.PUUUUKE!!!
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago
Did you even read the first of the dark towers? Because you sound like your full of shit. anyone thats ever read those know they are fucking great. your a sorry critic, no real fight with what you said. just a bunch of bull. you go write a better book asshole!!!
eatthemoon13 3 years ago
let me tell u about king .If 1 would get into a car accident and lose 90 % of his brain due to it, one would still be able to write better book than almost any of SK's books . the great science of metaphysic wouldn't be able to explain how such a vomit as "Wolves of the Calla" could be laid in print and through all 800 sorry ass pages.
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago
MAN you must be a teenager who knows nothing.get your facts right.Your iq is too low for stephens books
playmakerzam 3 years ago
of course u r an idiot.The idiot.just for praising SK as one great writer.Another thing, u r stupid for not using wikipedia where tells u who danielle steel is...She sold 550 milion copies of her books which is 200 milion above SK ( 350 milion)..and yes, more movies than SK after her books ( 23 )..idiot!!!!
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago
The irony of your comment on literature when you have only the loosest grasp on spelling, grammar, and punctuation...
Ponderous, dumbass.
BelleFourche 3 years ago 2
For people never heard of Celine or Beckett, punctuation is what it is, as well as writers like SK to venerate in front of fools. But then again, of course that someone of a "dumbass" language would never even hear of Celine, less to read him or follow.Leo Tolstoy once fairly defined what art iss and most of it he recycled into a strong group of art imitations. That concerned even Zola and Wagner. For SK I am not sure that he would find anything except his books being an unpleasant toilet paper.
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago
DAMN GREG WHEELER KICKS ASS!
galanwheel 3 years ago
Are these people really arguing on who's the best author? If you look the books, read 'em! If you don't, then don't! That's that. No author is better than any author in fact. But if you want to think one is better than the other, that's your opinion. Let somebody else think differently on the matter. I personally LOVE Stephen King's work, but I don't go around criticizing everybody who doesn't. Get over it. People have different opinion, people. That's why books sell. People like them.
KirKir21 3 years ago 2
u r a moron.U know nothing about literature..NADA!!! u said "no author is better than any author in fact ". You r out of your mind. What that means, that James Patterson is better author than William Faulkner ? That Janet Evanovich is better than Luis Ferdinand Celine? oh yes, who's Celine, right ?
FUCK OFF!!! go watch them reality shows, u moron...
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago
You don't know anything about the English language. Why should we believe you know anything about literature. "u r a moron"? "U know nothing"? "You r out of your mind"? "watch them reality shows, u moron..."?
It's so ironic.
Vecnoran 3 years ago
why would u say that ?
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago
LOL!
a0lsucks 3 years ago
According to you . . . .
"Bobz life wuz gud. He playd in summur."
is just as good as
"Bob's life was wonderful and carefree. Summer was his wonderland where nothing mattered but sun and grass."
Get back to me on that.
MrGameposter 2 years ago
Yeah, you're a regular Hubert Selby, ain'tchya?
Full of shit much?
BelleFourche 3 years ago
stupid idiot..Danielle Steel sells more than anyone..three times more than Sk, so what that makes her, a great writer..a garbage assembler, exactly what she is...
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago
One of the keys of sellig a lot of books - don't be too good. You don't get rich from writing for people who look for something really artful and original. It's the Kiss-principle: keep it simple and stupid. No matter with what kind of entertainment you try to get rich - you'll only archive your goal, if you can mobilize the biggest of the hidden reserves: the idiots.
Pimpelhuber 3 years ago
couldn't agree more...
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago
i agree to make money this is true, but ideas are your children and how could you ever do such an injustice to your children as not make them the best possible?
uncklekk 3 years ago
...but then again not a very serious one cause you have probably done all your homework and read too much Rand along the way.
jazzmanEE 3 years ago
Your a fucking idiot. Your obviously a fucking bloody idiot. If SK's works are so bad why have they sold more copies then you can even count to you fucking prick. Also one more thing what have you done in your life worth mentioning. Wait whats that o yes nothing! Sk has all the writing sucess in the world when you have nothing yet your critazizing him! You haven't done a thing in your life worth mentioning you Quack!
dragonbreed07 3 years ago
question : if, as u idiot said, SK is a genius then let me ask u fairly...what is Jose Saramago then? a fusion between spinoza and christ ?...or what is faulkner or toni morrison then ? crossover between budha and kant ? what's wrong with u people..serious literature is like bach or mozart or sibelius...SK is justin timberlake...
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago
MrtvaPriroda that's just YOU not liking SK...And just cause he hasnt gotten a nobel prize for literature (like Faulkner and Morisson that you mentioned ) doesn't mean that he isn't a great writer. I bet you anything that your children will be taught SK in literature in the future, and he'll be refered to among the classics come 30 years time.
jazzmanEE 3 years ago 2
nobel prize!!? r u serious!!? well, of course he is not in the bracket for the nobel..why? cause he is not good enough.and he is a good writer , but what I am fighting here is a bullshit of many idiots saying how SK is "the best writer".while garcia is living, while Toni Morrison is living, while Naipaul and Saramago are among living!!!it is like saying that bulgarian basketball team is more skillful than Boston Celtics and all that garbage statement just because one likes Bulgaria.
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago
i quote what you just wrote "well, of course he is not in the bracket for the nobel..why?cause he is not good enough"
that's about the stupides comment i have ever read.what makes someone a better writer than another? and why should horror or science fiction not be considered as serious as other more "serious" types of writing?
Maybe you need a serious lesson in objectivism.
jazzmanEE 3 years ago 2
Lisey' story...awful book...like 95% of king's novels....this guy writes so bad , he wouldn't be able to find his fitting place in american litarature not even as changing post menstrual tampons for toni morrison...
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago
Obviously you are not intelligent enough to appreciate Stephen King's works. Why did you even bother commenting on such a literary genius?
1kashy 3 years ago
then why the h.e.double hockey sticks are you looking at posts about him? just to hiss hate at fans? get a life. SK is a author genius...like a wine his work gets better and better with time
punkinhead131 3 years ago
Stephen King...few half sane books..most of it VOMIT...no one is going to memorise this dude 30 years from now....just watch...same garbage as Patterson or Koontz...a few points better thou...
MrtvaPriroda 3 years ago
Try spelling something better than a first-grader could before criticizing multi-million copy-selling author.
BTW, King began writing in the late 60's
*Gasp!* That's FOURTY YEARS!
MrGameposter 2 years ago
What is Stephen King's favorite of his books, do you know? Or his favorite character? Is he really Gan do you think?
Opalwitley 4 years ago
He's one of those authors that says that his books are like his children and he hates having to choose between them. HOWEVER, he has stated on a couple of occasions that "The Reach" is his short story he likes the most.
Rishoutfield 4 years ago
Personally I favor the hell out of the Dark Tower series, but as for what he knows, perhaps "Rishoutfield" is right.
000majorwinters000 3 years ago
Personally I favor the hell out of the Dark Tower series, but as for what he knows, perhaps "Rishoutfield" is right.
000majorwinters000 3 years ago
its actually called Lisey's story...not lisleys's story...lol....
31193JaH 4 years ago
31193JaH: THANK YOU! You are the first person to catch this. Thanks!! And to think, I actually did proof-reading for a publshing company years back for a while.
netcinema 4 years ago
no probz..lol...
31193JaH 4 years ago