Added: 3 years ago
From: orionmachine
Views: 621
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wow they both have lisps.

  • lets see....

    Company + traders are losing money...OR

    Companies are losing money and traders a profiting...what is best for the economy...hmmhm

  • LMFAO! Shorting doesn't kill a company because you have to BORROW the shares! That means for EVERY share thats short, there is a share thats LONG!! Some people are so dumb, shorts don't drive stocks down you morons.

  • Phil was talking about "Naked" shorting, which is when you do not borrow the shares. According to Tim and Phil there is a big difference between the two. I am not a stock expert though, so I can't dispute the case.

  • Ah, I see. Pardon my overreaction, I've just been running into a lot of people who think shorting is "evil" and should be banned.

    There is a big difference, and that is naked shorting is illegal. However most people don't think of this and say shorting stocks drives them into the gorund, and therefore they say shorting should be banned or we should slap more regulations on it. All we have to do is enforce the laws that are already there.

  • Go to investopedia and look up "Naked shorting" it will explain the difference.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more