Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (836)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • why is these ass ?hole with jacob?

  • Well, now with the neutrino discovery...

  • Glen Beck is going to show me god's handywork... prick

  • WTF!! GLEN BECK NIETCHEZE'S TITLE WAS GOD IS DEAD AND WE KILLED HIM! why? because through people like you making a pure mockery of religion that no one wants anything to do with it anymore you piece of shit tool!!

  • Beck is such a dick.....that I can't even watch this.....later.

  • YA BUT canu memorize the alphabet like me!

  • his IQ will drop if he watches Fox

  • The kid is autistic. He's been on soooo many TV shows, I can't believe nobodyone else has seen him before. It's obviously a product of parenting....you tell your kid he is smarter than Einstein, and he eventually believes it.....

  • V=LxWxH Now you know! lol.

  • "Steven Hawking can think in 3 dimensions, -I believe so, but I can do in 4 or 5!"

    Translation: "There's one of the most clever person on the Earth, who can do sthg, that very few other can do. -Maybe, but still I can do that better. No, even better, waaaaaaaaay better!" Let's just say this is ridiculous.

  • Is this kid a Vulcan, check his ears, he's hiding them behind his snap back!

  • This kid is going to be so fucked up.

  • Beck has the mind of a 12 year old

  • What is ass burgers

  • id push that smug little egotistical prick out the fucking window then jump out after and curb stomp his fucking face in

  • this kid has got nothing on einstein what a joke

  • he has aspergers but hes a terrible actor i.e. the backwards hat

  • He wasn't trying to make a volume equation of a fucking box of cereal at 14 month old, there is no way he would have even seen a volume equation at that age. This show is fucking ridiculous, I'm sure this kid is very smart, but they need to stop making these ridiculous claims because the kid will become depressed when he tries to enter University at a very early age and realise you can't bullshit your way to a phd, they'll know when he is blagging.

  • @lyricaltesting he'll finish his degree at 14yrs old, that is, next year!

    he's been commissioned to produce a study at age 12. (he was paid, that is!)

    i guess, your news is late...or, you weren't just aware.

    in my work, i bump into some kids with autism. some of them can actually seem ridiculously exceptional! yes, it actually seems like they couldn't bullshit their way to a phd.

    we do look ridiculous to some of them. and, that's alright. :)

  • "I wouldn't even recognize an equation for volume" Seriously dude?  You shouldn't even be allowed to talk to this kid, he might catch the stupid.

  • edit- damnit i feel bad now. just got to the part about aspergers

  • i would have liked the schmuck if he wasn't so full of himself

  • In real life

    this kid would get his ass kicked every day

  • @michiyoyoshiku That's just sad. You're gonna end up living in a trailer and this kid is gonna end up doing great things for humanity.

  • @Dorkus89Malorkus

    I'm going to win the nobel prize this kid is going to be laughed out of every institution in the world.

    Get it right

  • @michiyoyoshiku Yeah I'm sure you did physics at the age of 12. He might be full of himself but he sure has some math skills.

    Better move that trailer lest you get a parking ticket.

  • @Dorkus89Malorkus

    I live in a two story house in the woods. maybe you should move your trailer.

    Physics mastery isn't going to save the world. But my psychological breakthroughs will.

  • @michiyoyoshiku Physics is one of the major sciences that has given us everything from aircraft to nuclear power. Sure, physics hasn't done anything for us.

    You live in your parents house, it's not yours.

  • @Dorkus89Malorkus

    Ask the people of Prypiat ukraine how nuclear power has worked out. and this is my house you idiot.

    You can't accept the fact I'm successful.

  • @michiyoyoshiku That does nothing to change the fact that without nuclear power half of the world would shut down. Physics has given us pretty much anything in technology that you can think of. The fact alone that you diss physics as something that has never given us anything proves that you're an idiot. I don't doubt that you live out in the woods in a cottage. That's where you belong.

  • never in a hundred years thought i would thumbs up a Glenn Beck video

  • Ohh this kid is smart but he's not smarter than einstein Einstein theory has been around for years not being able to be disprovin from world rebound scientist

  • I NEED TO BE REWIRED.

  • THIS IS BULLSHIT, the middle is 6:52, and there is no 6:52, where the hell am i suppose to put my arrow.

  • ima fuck that kid up

  • Glenn Beck is dumb.

  • @AlgonaTKD your dumb, if you were smart you would listen to him. cant wait to say i told you so

  • @MrGman543 Einstein, Newton, and Maxwell were doing Calculus by age 3, solving complex system binaries by age 5, and constructing universal field theories by age 8. This kid is about, oh I don't know, 8 years behind :). So keep "waiting" to tell us so.

  • @Rnadom2232 Interesting. Does that mean Newton invented a time machine too? Because he invented calculus at the age of 20....

  • @Rnadom2232 i am not talking about the kid moron. plz stop this crap, your so blind to just listen to the president without questioning him. if you were smart you would really learn and understand the constitution, but keep listening to your college professor buddy. good luck when you get in the real world and find out what a cruel world this is. no democrat will ever fix that, in fact they try to, but make it worse.

  • these adults are just weathering his brain.

  • I wonder how fake this is.

  • What an insufferable douche Beck is.

  • "I wouldn't even recognise an equation for volume, would you?"

    "Nope"

    "No"

    Wow, really? Isn't volume 3rd or 4th grade maths(In australia at least)

  • Yo that snapback is dope

  • Glenn Beck - "I carried Einstein's "Relativity" in my back pocket for a year and a half.... read it over and over again and couldn't grasp it" (a minute later) Glenn Beck - "I wouldn't even recognize an equation for volume, would you?" Well no wonder...

  • awesome mother he's got!

  • He writes the equation on the board, now explain it.

  • Einstein's iq > 200

  • this guys is really smart, but is he as creative as einstein and hawking? becouse iff he just can solve equations, i mean any math proffessor could do that, but can he come up with great theroies thinking that he rides a beam light like einstein? (sorry for the poor spelling)

  • Glenn Beck is a rude, insensitive idiot.

  • "i can think in four and five dimensions!".... then draws a hypercube in 2d like no one else could.

  • The Guy interviewing them is really lame and doesnt know how to properly speak without. like eemmm aaam aa i asked ummm aa you today aa eemm.....SHUT UP

  • This show is an embarrassment.

  • He'll NEVER be like you Beck....he's better and you suck.

  • The kids to cocky

  • Not disliking because i hate the kid, i just hate the stupid interviewer

  • Glenn Beck = Dumb. Parents = Dumb. Kid = Smart, but surrounded by idiots. They are raising him to be such a douche.

  • Comment removed

  • "I can think in 4 and 5 dimensions" no... you just drew a cube around another cube.

  • @spankthemonkee112 He draw a 2-dimensional picture of a 4D hypercube, also known as a tesseract. Of course he can't imagine higher dimensions, but we can think of it. For us, a hypercube is two cubes connected to each other, but think of a cube. What is a cube? It is two squares connected to each other. Actually, a cube is a infinite ammount of squares "lying" on each other. A tesseract must be a inifinte ammount of cubes "lying" on each other, too.

  • @Markus9705 The kid claimed to be able to think in four and five dimensions and tried to demonstrate this by drawing a "cube around another cube." Whether his drawing was a projection of a four-dimensional object onto two-dimensional space or not, it does not mean that he's capable of visualizing higher-dimensional space. The fact that he thinks he's able to do something that is impossible for every other human being does not make him smarter than everyone else. It just means he's really cocky.

  • @jaimesthesaint As I said, he can't imagine higher dimensions, but he can think of it. He can't draw a hypercube, of course, only a projection.

    And yes, he said wrong. He isn't capable of visualizing higher-dimensional space. But if he can draw hypercubes at the age of 12 I think he IS smart, actually.

  • @Markus9705 I didn't get to elaborate on my final statement because of the character limit. Of course he's very smart if he's doing this at 12, but his cockiness far surpasses what is warranted by his intelligence. He is not smarter than every living physicist. Even if he were, it wouldn't matter. In science, the validity of an idea is measured by the evidence for it, not by the intelligence of the individual who proposed it. He doesn't get to say, "I'm smarter than the other guy, so I'm right."

  • @jaimesthesaint But he probably has the highest IQ of all living physicist.

  • @Markus9705 Probably not. But again: so what?

  • @Markus9705 Well yeah, but that doesn't change the fact that he drew a cub around another cube and said it was in 5 dimensions, that wasn't even an accurate depiction of what a hypercube would look like.

  • @spankthemonkee112 He draw what a hypercube would look like in 2D (its two dimensional shadow). Yes, it was so accurate depiction you can get of how a hypercube would look like. The projection type of the hypercube is called a Schlegel diagram.

  • Gentille Intelligence

  • I thought he was going to draw a penis at 9:46

  • i hate that kids smug face..i wanna put my fist in it, but he is pretty smart

  • @samdaleyhillary thats not proof.

  • The fact that THIS kid came from THESE parents proves the existence of god more than anything Glenn Beck could ever think of.

  • "I wouldn't recognize an equation for volume, would you?" well if you watch fox news regularly or work for fox news then probably not.

  • why does this say he challenges einsteins theory of relativity, but in the video he trys to disprove the big bang theory? einstens theory of general relativity has been confirmed on paper(equations) and with absolute proof. change the title of this video or something.

  • Ok I realize he is 13 (currently) but geez he is soooo arrogant. He can think in 4 dimensions? Impossible. Yes his ability to do calculus at his age (not being Asian of course) is impressive, but it does not allow him to proclaim that he is smarter than Einstein and Hawking!

  • Fox News, where intelligence and reality is non-existant.

  • Goddamn Glenn is so fucking annoying.

  • He just insulted him by giving god the credits.

  • Glenn is stupid. He's patronizing and it's very annoying. The kid's parents (the mom in particular, but the dad too) also seem stupid. There's a weird vibe from that family, I can't put my finger on it, but there's something strange about them.

  • Really?... they give him a Calc II problem that isn't even difficult. Also... who says cos instead of cosine.

  • he is nothing compare to 8 year old college kid but he is still all some if i had one wish beside world peaces is to become a prodigy

  • Comment removed

  • I hate this little cunt.. doesn't matter how smart you are... everyone can get the shit beat out of them.

  • I understand the theory of special relativity, does that make me a genius? Ok im 19 and not 12 but at least I understand more than Glenn Back.

  • As a college student with IQ 138 and a double major in physics and mechanical engineering I find this to be incredibly patronising. This kid has yet to do anything I can't do and the fact that he's 8 years younger than me isn't enough to impress me. I can solve a rubik's cube blindfolded but I'm not looking to get on TV claiming to have a "photographic memory" because I fucking don't and either does he. I'm smart and that's the end of it, someone needs to teach this kid some fucking modesty.

  • @ModelOrange Jealous much?

  • @raz1024 No, I just got a little worked up because there are people who I feel would actually deserve the attention.

  • @ModelOrange So a 12-year-old who is on his way to a Ph.D. before his teens are out does not deserve attention? Please. He's already publishing. And who knows what leaps he'll have made by the time he's in his 20s. And besides, you think if you gave attention to people who "deserve it more", the general populous would pay attention? Not saying others don't deserve it, but you're putting too much stock in a brief novelty story on a network...espeically since it's FOX!

  • @ModelOrange i think there is a tendency to think that smart or genious people MUST be good at math! Thats the most idiotic thing; there are many different types of intelligence. You cant say Beethoven wasnt an ingenious because he maybe wasnt good at maths! He even may had an IQ of more than 160!

  • @ModelOrange Teach yourself some modesty. "I'm smart and that's the end of it"? Yeah, that's real modest of you. Being modest would entail not feeling threatened by a 12-year old. You can solve a Rubik's cube blindfolded, and so can anyone else who wants to take the time to remember the algorithms.

  • @Twinsfan28 Hahaha dude, That was my fucking point you're arguing against yourself. I'm not trying to get any attention for it because anyone CAN learn how to solve it blindfolded if they really wanted to. But regardless, it's way fucking harder than logarithmically differentiating or proving convergence. It's irritating that this kid is claiming to disprove all of science with no reason or explanation given in the video. Read the top comment, it sums it up well.

  • I just wanted to point out that anyone calling glen beck an idiot for claiming this child a genius especially after watching this kid perform multivariable calculus, at AGE 12!!!

    Well you people are clueless as to what intellegence really is, sadly... I envy your blissful ignorance.

  • I need to borrow this kid for my calc 2 exam next week.

  • Of course this is wrong.

  • This is so fascinating to watch. I've never seen so much false drama made for a news show.

  • Since when does being able to write in two different languages mean that you're a genius with an IQ of 170? Glenn Beck is an idiot.

  • @Mafila The kid was doing multivariable calculus... at AGE 12 are you kidding me? This kid is a prodigy.

  • @Mrjammintime1 You obviously misread my comment, I wasn't talking about the kid, I was talking about Glenn Beck's idiotic comment when he was comparing the kid to Thomas Jefferson. There is no argument that the kid is an absolute genius and a child prodigy, but Glenn Beck is an idiot.

  • Fuck Glenn Beck, fucking FAGIT!

  • i cant get over how clueless these parents are...

  • @manoffayth *cough* blond*cough*

  • oh yeah but i bet he sucks at black ops

  • I wish i had autism , I really do...

  • @MrSethsiPodz Just because you have autism doesnt mean you have sevant abilities, you could just be a fucking idiot like Glenn Beck...

  • the parents support the republican party, how do i know that?

  • Lol...."GOD".

  • this kid is a douche lol

  • hes a cocky prick

  • THE MOST IMPORTANT THEORY EVER : THE TRUTH ALWAYS GO OUT FROM KID'S MOUTH.

  • I'm sorry but if you can't grasp relativity a least a little bit your just plain stupid. Read it in plain English "energy is equal to mass times the speed of light squared". So any idiot should be able to reason that the equation means that energy and mass are one and the same thing.

  • I think it's safe to assume that the 138 dislikes are people disliking Beck - not the kid.

  • I NEVER thought I would rather hear Beck talk politics (aka - anti-intellectual moralistic bull)

  • Comment removed

  • IQ is irrelevant. Chris Langdon's IQ is over 200, but his scientific theory is seen as a joke among physicists.

  • @QuantumGh0st they may just not get it then. IQ (though not perfect) is very relevant. Try reading "IQ testing 101" by Alan S. Kaufman

  • Sorry astrophysicists. I know that data from Hubble Expansion, CoBE, WMAP, primordial element concentrations, galaxy distributions, and type 1A supernova all line up perfectly with the observable universe expanding out of a hot, dense, early state 13.7 billion years ago, but some kid who solved a Calc II problem on Glen Beck's blackboard said he didn't like that theory. Guess it's back to the drawing board.

  • @jaimesthesaint

    Sounds like someone is jealous that this 12 year old understands more about physics, mathematics, and the universe around us than most understand after a lifetime of study.

  • @jaimesthesaint

    Also FYI, Einstein believed that they universe was constant and static not expanding. In fact he spent his entire life looking for the cosmic constant that would prove his theory correct.

    Disproving relativity though would be a great leap forward if relativity is incorrect then we can look at light speed travel more realistically since we would not have to worry about a 10 month trip taking 10,000 years to complete due to relative theory.

  • @ViCe1986 Einstein thought the universe was static because Hubble hadn't discovered its expansion yet. When Hubble Expansion was discovered, that wasn't a problem for relativity - it just meant that lambda (the cosm. constant) had a different value than expected.

    Nowadays, lambda is interpreted to be "dark energy" and measurements have shown it to make up ~72% of the universe, but again, this is irrelevant because relativity doesn't make a precise prediction for what lambda should be.

  • @ViCe1986 Regarding "disproving relativity": If relativity were not an accurate description of the universe, the computer you're using to read this wouldn't work. Nor would your GPS, your smoke detector, PET scans, or the nuclear reactions in the sun. Relativity has been verified countless times in many different experiments. We might, one day, find it to be incomplete, but just like the Newtonian physics that preceded it, it will never go away, so I'd get used to it if I were you.

  • @ViCe1986 Lastly:

    "If it disagrees with experiment it is wrong. In that simple statement is the key to science. It does not make any difference how beautiful your guess is. It does not make any difference how smart you are, who made the guess, or what his name is - if it disagrees with experiment it is wrong. That's all there is to it." - R.P. Feynman

    It does not matter how smart this kid is or how much you like his ideas. Only data matter. If experiments don't support his ideas, they're wrong.

  • @jaimesthesaint There's so many things that you're not considering.

  • @GotZest Such as?

  • @jaimesthesaint I'm 20 and I understand relativistic physics. I also understand that it is wrong. It doesn't take into account for the non-static nature of the Universe. All of this stuff is moving. It's cycling around itself, really fast but it looks really slow compared to the perspective that we have as part of it. This kid is on to it, the real way everything is. That is, the universe is infinite and finite at the same time. So it is imploding and expanding at the same time.

  • @jaimesthesaint well this kid is clearly an idiot-savant. in short hes like a computer, not much original thought but amazing calculating abilities. also the big bang theory has already been disproven in MANY different ways... i thought everyone knew that. their are other theories that are similar that have not been but the "big bang theory" is nonsense.

  • @ThomasJeffersonMan How is "the big bang theory" nonsense?

  • "I can think in four and five [dimensions]"

    Bullshit.

  • @jaimesthesaint any competent pilot thinks in 4.

  • @nerdyharry No they don't, because the human brain is not capable of picturing more than three independent axes at once.

    If you're talking about pilots picturing three dimensions of space, and considering time as well, that's different. They're projecting points in four-dimensional space-time onto three-dimensional space and picturing them in three dimensions. They are not picturing a time axis in addition to three space axes, so they are not thinking in four dimensions.

  • @jaimesthesaint doesn't picturing changing rates of dynamic change in 3d matter over time count as visualizing a 4th axis? the kind of skill that lends itself to choreography, or aeronautics?

  • @nerdyharry No, it doesn't. Though, it is certainly useful to be able to project objects in higher dimensions onto lower-dimensional spaces that can be visualized. However, this is not the same as visualizing four linearly-independent axes at once, which is something that the brain cannot do, no matter how smart you are.

  • @jaimesthesaint why do you need an axis to picture a scene in 3d, moving. maybe some people besides yourself find it easy to visualize a 3d event in "bullet-time" perspective, being able to choose from which angle they view a synthesized version of reality in their mind, and accurately estimating changes in the rate of change to those models over a course of 'time'.

  • @nerdyharry That's not picturing the scene in four dimensions, that's imagining a sequence of three-dimensional descriptions of the scene in chronological order. If you could imagine the scene at all times, simultaneously, while maintaining a complete description of the scene in the three spatial dimensions, and actually make sense of this picture, then you would be picturing the scene in four dimensions.

  • @jaimesthesaint well, that's how they'd block it out in the storyboards, but how do you know positively that it's impossible? people like bach and mozart could improvise 6-part fugues, why can't someone highly mentally trained visualize, for example, an 800 cubic metre virtual space in their mind, with 6 ninjas fighting 3 on 3, 'improvising' as they visualize it in their imagination to every detail down to realistic movement of their clothing and and hair until the scene is over?

  • @nerdyharry When I said "simultaneously," I meant "simultaneously in the same graph," not "side-by-side." The storyboard as you described would be a series of 3-dimensional "slices," not an actual 4-dimensional model. A 4-dimensional model can only exist in a space with at least four dimensions i.e. a space in which at least four independent axes can be defined. No one can visualize such a space, so no one can make a genuine 4d model.

  • @jaimesthesaint "When I said ... "side-by-side.""

    Another clarification: Not only does the model have to be plotted on a single 4d graph, that graph needs to be continuous, which would require more information than could ever be provided by a series of 3d representations.

    It's important to note that every time you represent a 4d system with a 3d model, information about the system gets lost. That's why none of the models you've brought up count as being 4d. It isn't just me nit-picking.

  • @nerdyharry There are, of course, other ways of thinking about problems in which there are four or more dimensions aside from actually making a four-dimensional representation (you've mentioned a few), but these are clever ways of getting around the fact that we can't visualize a four-dimensional space and don't count as examples of thinking in four or more dimensions.

  • his parents are bullshiting........

  • Wow, that interviewer is kind of an asshole..

  • lol fox news u already know their answer " ask the questions ul give the answer and wel forget it and then wel lie for a while and tel u its news even tho its not because wev been sue for being fox fake retard christian news

  • lmao he's writing log rules on windows....OMG HE MUST BE SO SMART...

  • Glen Beck seriously wouldn't recognize the equation for the volume of a rectangular box? Seriously?

    Seriously?

  • is the kid's mom quagmire's dad?!!!

  • I thought he was going to attempt to disprove the big bang?

  • learn what nietzsche's quote actually means before spreading more of your stupid nonsense. what a jackass.

  • What a great entertainer Glenn Beck is.

  • Hah! That's what I was doing last semester in college. Except I'm 8 years older than him lol.

  • Glenn beck is so dumb. This kid isn't even that smart compared to the kids who are actually really smart. There are 12 year olds who make the USAMO, he doesn't do anything that proves it. It looks like he just memorized a few definitions of calculus

  • Man Glenn Beck is an ass and he definitely is threatened by this kid. I'm offended by him.

  • "I wouldn't even recognize an equation for a volume".

    Oh dear.

  • one doesnt simply study in front of a computer....

  • fox news not surprised...

  • his parents wouldn't recognize an equation for the volume for a box?!

    im surprised that two such idiotic minds can breed to create such a prodigy.

  • hahahahaha Glenn is moron! xD Literally!

    couldn't grasp Einstein's theory of relativity at 30 bahahaha

  • this kid is awesome ! but glen beck is retarded

  • why the fuck do you loosers keep hating on beck? this video is about the kid, not beck

  • Just the name of Glen beck makes me gag a little. The guy is a creepy pedobear, and those glasses and grey hair isn't helping.

  • Glen Beck is epitome of evil. Poor kid has to suffer being around creepy ass neck-beard...

  • g beck deserves to lose his job there

  • this glenn guy is like... fucktarded the fuck out of his fucking mind

  • i bet he has a nice weenie

  • Beck need attention!!

  • Ugly monkey tries to interview some intelligence. 

  • Photographic memories don't actually exist look it up

  • glenn beck is a fucking dick sucker. i want to knock his teeth out

  • 170? Holy crap. I wish I had a photographic memory. I never really liked it when playing a game stuff like You were born to be awesome. this guy works his ass off for master swordplay and you are a prodigy that gets it in 10 seconds. In real life photographic memory is like that for intellegence. Unlike a normal person who tirelessly studies they can look at it. say, oh. cool. look at that, seems good. and then are done. I suppose that a person with that gift should not feel bad, but embrace it.