@frontenginedragsterd I would imagine that the tether lost all communication once it was severed? But they may have very well had measuring devices still working
@frontenginedragsterd Yes I figured that the charge on the tether made it look wider but wasnt 100% sure. I think David Sereda mentioned that the tether was charged too. So going on your hypothesis, then the objects around it may be charged as well and therefore considerably smaller and not a mile wide like most people say?
How can anyone trust NASA? This vid proves nothing. i'm still sticking with my first thought. this in no way debunks the inident because you didn't cover those most important questions...
why some objects stop change direction and just pop up out of nowhere....
what i never understood is the the tether is 12 miles long and how wide????? Maybe like 20 feet wide? But why does it look so wide 12 miles away? If the thether is 12 miles long and i take that scale and i measure the width it is like 1/2 mile wide./
So.. Scale has nothing to do with the relationship these things would have visually? That's the most flawed concept I've seen in a long time. And I've been watching videos on Uri Geller claiming he's real, but it's still fail.
You're making some assumptions here. If the center of the photocathode of the SIT Vidicon camera used to film the NASA footage is coincident with the mount pivot center, then parallax effects are impossible. Your simulation relies on the image sensor being displaced from the pivotal center, and is therefore questionable. The real cameras only exhibit parallax due to non-rotational displacement (oscillatory) in the rubber pan/tilt mounts following aim adjusment, suggesting nearfield objects.
@frontenginedragsterd I would imagine that the tether lost all communication once it was severed? But they may have very well had measuring devices still working
jamesgambino 5 months ago
@frontenginedragsterd Yes I figured that the charge on the tether made it look wider but wasnt 100% sure. I think David Sereda mentioned that the tether was charged too. So going on your hypothesis, then the objects around it may be charged as well and therefore considerably smaller and not a mile wide like most people say?
jamesgambino 5 months ago
How can anyone trust NASA? This vid proves nothing. i'm still sticking with my first thought. this in no way debunks the inident because you didn't cover those most important questions...
why some objects stop change direction and just pop up out of nowhere....
019208237 1 year ago
what i never understood is the the tether is 12 miles long and how wide????? Maybe like 20 feet wide? But why does it look so wide 12 miles away? If the thether is 12 miles long and i take that scale and i measure the width it is like 1/2 mile wide./
jamesgambino 2 years ago
So.. Scale has nothing to do with the relationship these things would have visually? That's the most flawed concept I've seen in a long time. And I've been watching videos on Uri Geller claiming he's real, but it's still fail.
Buzzkillskeptic 2 years ago
You're making some assumptions here. If the center of the photocathode of the SIT Vidicon camera used to film the NASA footage is coincident with the mount pivot center, then parallax effects are impossible. Your simulation relies on the image sensor being displaced from the pivotal center, and is therefore questionable. The real cameras only exhibit parallax due to non-rotational displacement (oscillatory) in the rubber pan/tilt mounts following aim adjusment, suggesting nearfield objects.
MoronAntidote 2 years ago 2
How far did you place the imaging surface from the pivot i wonder?
MoronAntidote 2 years ago
Have you also considered the 6:1 zoom (NASA MLA Lens Assembly)?
MoronAntidote 2 years ago
Well?
MoronAntidote 2 years ago
@Raybo58
Are you going to accept that you made an error here or not?
MoronAntidote 1 year ago
Comment removed
MoronAntidote 2 years ago
if you guy are interested in watching the objects flying around the tether in space then here is the actual object observed from EARTH..
watch?v=DOLjCpmZmEQ
Gaobdgao 2 years ago
Excellent, but I was never in any doubt they were Alien. 5 stars.
Streetcap1 2 years ago
Comment removed
0LabRat0 2 years ago
Wasnt sure where you were going with this to begin with, but ya...bloody brilliant!!!
5s, fav'd, and yet another nail in the nasa bullocks machine
GoldieTalon 2 years ago