Added: 5 years ago
From: grassrootinnovation
Views: 15,097
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (13)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What you believe is incorrect, ...Unbiased and credible science does not back up your grossly uneducated opinions on this topic.

  • just open the window let the smoke go out so that the second hand will not be the killer

  • The older generation lived through a time when more people smoked and they smoked everywhere, so why has average life expectancy increased by two years, and why is there a larger aging population, why havn't they all been killed by second hand smoke.

  • Complete garbage!

    second-hand smoke is not even a proven MINOR health risk, it might be annoying to some people, but...

    Directly inhaling smoke into one's lungs is obviously a far greater health risk, than ingesting a few heavily dilluted whisps to passive smoke.

  • Complete garbage eh? yeah, I would say that your comment is complete garbage.

    Take a basic college level health class and come back when you aren't as ignorant or naive.

    People like you shouldn't be allowed to vote.

  • @VS120sfan Yeah, it's not complete garbage. Half of the time the smoke isn't that diluted, especially if it is inside a house. Come on, inhaling second-hand smoke is just as dangerous as actually putting the cigarette in your mouth and taking a pull. Get your facts straight next time.

  • I smoke ,but i never smoke around people who don't unless i am outside. Personally i hate the smell of tobacco in the house, but i cant kick the addiction....Smoking outside dtops me smoking lots of cigs, especially on cold windy days :D

  • What a terrific video! How much longer do we have to have our family members in the death grip of the tobacco industry? Everyone has the right to breathe clean air in public places and at work.

  • amen, ban driving... drivers pollute my air more than smokers could ever dream of.

  • What utter nonsense.

    If what the anti-smoking lobby is saying was true...

    If there is no known safe level of second-hand tobacco smoke exposure for humans...

    No person living in a smoking permitted household would live past the ripe "old" age of 30 years.

    The truth and valid, unbiased science are not on the side of the anti-smoking army.

  • Utter nonsense, I think not. Second hand smoke is just as dangerous as first hand smoke. Oregon just passed a law that disallows second hand smoke in public places such as restaurant.

    Lung cancer is a silent killer, you could be as old as 60 before it metastisizes.

  • if you honestly believe 2nd hand smoke is as dangerous as first hand smoke... you are untold amounts of stupid. You don't even need studies, simple logic should tell you this. But yes, every single study concludes what simple logic should tell the person of average intelligence. If simple logic eludes you, then im sorry.

  • Lol, yeah, I'm not sure why I said 2nd hand smoke is just as bad as first hand smoke.

    But, there is no such thing as a safe level of smoke. Our lungs just happen to be very efficient and very convoluted, so they can handle dirt, smoke, and other particles...up to a point.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more