Too bad nobody told Hawking and these other physicists that the most important thing one can do in life - aside from service to others - is to choose rightly which god to believe in - one is real and the other isn't.
@gukonni I thought there were more than two to choose from. To which two are you refering? Personally I worship Bhaal the demon lord of entropy ... please tell me i picked the right one, you've got me worried now!
@gukonni in your mind god is real in others its debated and challenged whats wrong with that. koolaid drinking idiot I go on whats been proven not written in a book. books often brainwash people. start thinking for yourself instead taking easy route. i study physics religion paranormal stuff Hawking is Genuis and i seen crazy stuff happen who is right will prob be never be known prob until you die.
this is the most ridiculous cop out I've ever heard. Susskind's explanation was so much better in the first place. its too bad that he's too arrogant to admit that he's wrong and has to make up an outlandish claim to prove himself. its also too bad that no one says anything because of his condition. come on people one man's health is not as important as the knowledge that true science can provide
a christian friend of mine told me Hawking was sick as a curse from god for being an athiest. I wanted to slap him what about the 100's of other famous physicists did you god forget to curse them?
i think the best part is that he went and announced to everyone in the scientific community that he was wrong. he has taken a step that people can not, due to their ego.
So a wrong claim and his illness made him famous not a convincing scientific fact.After watching the full programme I still hasn't fully grasped the essence of it.
@Thatmetaldude590 And in maths nowadays it's even more grim. Who's heard of Wiles for example, (proved Fermat's last theorem). This is partly because modern maths and physics are so vast and varied nowadays that since about the 60's is very difficult for "giants" of the field to emerge. Perhaps Feynman/Schwinger/Gell-Mann etc were the leading figures of the final 'epic' generation.
@BagarozziBoi True, though I'm uncertain if that's negative. If the number of people within mathematics increase, either in percentage or number, that would still make a collective development that single individuals might not be able to achieve on their own. Although I believe one can expect notorious scientists and mathematicians to emerge in any near future anyway.
@Thatmetaldude590 In the physics community his reputation would have been more or less the same, perhaps a tiny bit less due to the human factor, but his work is his work. To the general public of course not, they haven't heard of Witten or Susskind, are hardly aware of figures like Penrose or Higgs, and Higgs only because he has something tangible named after him that gives them something to latch onto.
Imagine if somehow his condition could be reversed. He would be able to make spectacular progress! He would be able to get his ideas out with the speed at which his mind works. It's tragic, but without his ALS, he would have never been able to contemplate the mysteries of the universe so deeply and been forced to see it as a tangible force instead of an equation.
To be honest, I am somewhat skeptical of Stephen Hawking himself. It is clear that he could not function without the help of his research grad students. He appears to guide their work to some degree, but I have to wonder the degree to which Hawking's "New Work" is really just the work of grad students stamped with Hawking's "Lucasian Seal of Approval," if you will.
In my opinion, it seems like the grad students are really the ones doing all of the math.
@Th3oryOf3v3ryThing If Hawking succeeds to teach these students so they become as brilliant as he was/is, then this is still a brilliant thing. Of course then the names on the papers should be in a different order.
surfxeo, btw, i dont see any connection between the existence of black holes and the lack of evidence in support of gravity which holds it together, call it what you want, the black hole is still there, whether in cosmos or Einstein's scientific work or both remains to be seen:-)
what comes out of a black hole, the dust of space, energy and stuff like that, me think
please tell stephen to look for what comes out of a black hole, what stays in and what went in. information loss happens all the time, no black hole needed, just look at what will happen with my reco:-)
I was surprised to hear Hawking say that Black holes don't exist. I have been having the same suspicion about the non existence of black holes. Science is supposed to work from observation and yet no one has ever seen a black hole. Einstein only added the black hole hypothesis to make his theory work and yet he was honest to admit he didn't really believe in there existence. And gravity is thousand billion billion billion weaker than the electromagnetic force, so light not escaping is false.
@Surfxeo So, if there are no black holes, then what is at the center of most galaxies or our galaxy? What has the mass of 4 million times that of our sun, that we cannot see and has S2 (the closest star to the center of our galaxy)whipping around it at 3100 miles a sec? What else could it be?
@stilettosandshades Gravity is the weakest of the 4 forces of physics therefore its effects are negligible compared with the other over riding forces.
It only has that mass according to theoretical mathematical formula but has not any empirical evidence to support that assumption. I have an hypothesis what it might be based on plasma physics, which relates to the binary star problem.
If you want to know more about this other understanding of cosmology I recommend you search plasma cosmology or the electrical universe. I was skeptical at first until I started seeing repeatable testable theories that can be backed up by observation and predictions.
Stop trying to stroke your own egos and focus on how you might be able to assist these important men in doing their job better if even possible.The important thing is they are all working for the better of man and (in some cases) a much less important legacy. Whether or not they are right or wrong does not matter. The small steps they take to understand the universe are what matters. Maybe they should learn to understand that too(hawking AND Susskind). Collaboration is what got us here today.
......was wondering if anyone may have considered whether or not Hawking "lied" about being wrong at that conference because he didnt want his legacy to be a formula that unwound the basic laws of physics?...think about his answer..."only if there multi universes".
This is a bit too weird. parallel universes where black holes dont exist. Could a universe even exist without black holes and even if they did, what significance would those universes have for "preserving information". And lastly but not leastly how in hell could you ever prove any of it. You might as well be telling fairy tales.
This war is over. Susskind et al were correct and the non-loss of information due to the holograph principle has resolved it. Susskind wrote a book about it 2 years ago. This set of videos is enlightening, covers most of Susskind's book, and is 3 years old. Hence, Hawking's 2010 book on the universe and creation, The Grand Design
I respect Susskind but he should give Steven some slack, the guy is crippled and is not able to write up and hash out his ideas as fast as an ablebodied scientist of his caliber would. I absolutely love the multi-universe theory, the M-theory. It clears up everything so nicely and elegantly. A blackhole in essence turns into an object eerly similar to a singularity, literally funneling information from this universe to another, with no hope of return.
what the hell is information? and how did they know that this information exist in first place? So if the information can not be destroyed it can not be created. When the matter changes its shape or function, that is information lost. All of this is not problem of mine and seem to be BULLSHI.
@hykovachev Well since you are not a physicist, and you have no idea what the word information means in a scientific context, no one cares whether you think it's bullshit. They can't expound on all of theoretical physics in a short TV program. If you really care go and take a physics course, and if you don't care enough to try and understand keep your opinions to yourself.
@hooloovoo1st ......was wondering if anyone may have considered whether or not Hawking "lied" about being wrong at that conference because he didnt want his legacy to be a formula that unwound the basic laws of physics?...think about his answer..."only if there multi universes".
I want to believe that Stephen Hawking has a more complex system for navigating his way around a computer. By what I've seen in these videos, it seems that he is browsing through a computer by pushing the equivalent of the TAB key to get the desired result. Not only is that slow and primitive, but I know for a fact that there are navigation tools (such as video cameras detecting eye motion or muscle sensors) that would make it easier for him to use a computer and to write down his ideas faster.
This paradox is about the reversibility of information, or, reconstructing the matter after it has entered the event horizon. The information about the matter might either be lost (as per Hawking) or cannot be lost as it violates principles of quantum mechanics. One solution Hawking has proposed here is that the information may be re-constructed (after admitting that information indeed is not lost once matter goes inside the event horizon), but by taking into picture parallel universes...
This paradox is about the reversibility of information, or, reconstructing the matter after it has entered the event horizon. The information about the matter might either be lost (as per Hawking) or cannot be lost as it violates principles of quantum mechanics. One solution Hawking has proposed here is that the information may be re-constructed (after admitting that information indeed is not lost once matter goes inside the event horizon), but by taking into picture parallel universes...
This paradox is about the reversibility of information, or, reconstructing the matter after it has entered the event horizon. The information about the matter might either be lost (as per Hawking) or cannot be lost as it violates principles of quantum mechanics. One solution Hawking has proposed here is that the information may be re-constructed (after admitting that information indeed is not lost once matter goes inside the event horizon), but by taking into picture parallel universes...
the paradox is about the reversibility of information, or to say, reconstructing the matter after it has entered the event horizon. the information about the matter might either be lost (as per Hawking) or cannot be lost as it violates principles of quantum gravity. One solution Hawking has proposed here is from the information may be re-constructed (after admitting that information indeed is not lost once matter goes inside the event horizon). hope this pans out into something more meaningful.
damn, i genuinly feel bad for hawking, all that knowlege and intelligence trapped inside his head, it must be frustrating having to take so long to put conclusions on to paper
Hawking was right from the beginning. It is absrd to say that information is retained in the ring of the event horizon. This is crazy. If the black hole is so powerful that nothing can defy it, not even light, then how can information be preserved? And even if it were preserved, who would be the fool to go and gather it? Sassking? He' d be a fool to go even near, thus even if the info may be preserved in the edge of the black hole, still it is irretreivable.
@6SpAr6TAN69 i dont understand what they mean by the "information being preserved on the event horizon" isnt there a jet that escapes the black hole?? theres a jet that emits particles out of black hole, maybe thats all the stuff that got sucked in, but crushed into such small particles that theres some stuff we cannot detect, sprayed out into space, then re-forms into stars eventually, idunno im not an expert but i like to think about stuff like this
@MrSweatyZombie the vents are stuff that is diverted away from the black hole due to magnefic field reasons, not sucked in, so the stuff that is sucked in should maintain a signature within the black hole, i.e. in the event horizon. it's same reason Hawking said that once the BH dies there is no signature remaining, but Susskind somehow proved otherwise.
@flippitydoo As for the week between my responses... I work, make lots of money, and simply respond to you because it is amusing to hear you try to defend your position. Once again, I'm really sorry you didn't understand this video. Its made for the laymen people and sadly enough you may be even below that level of specialized intelligence.
@Zeldovich you think I googled that? So I guess you knew my major in college, and all about the rest of my personal life. As for what fallacies you have committed- you have committed the Red Herring and Ad Hominem, and Personal attacks. Aside from the traditional logical fallacies, you assume my : intelligence, what I am doing on the internet, things that do not make sense to you must be wrong, and that your precious Flatlands is anything other than a boring and amusing metaphorical novel.
How the fuck can you be world wide famous and prestiegious and rich as a rats ass and you cant hire some scientists to do some gene therapy on your fuckin spinal cord I dont fuckin understand. the technology is out there its 2010 godammit
I am uninformed, but it seems to me we are looking that things wrong. Maybe space is being created, and that the center of a black-hole is being created faster then the mater can occupy it. Gravity between 2 objects is inverse(^2), radius sphere inverse(^3). one can see, how at distance the gravity-curve would be greater, and at very close ranges the Increase in a sphere's volume vs radius curve could be larger. The basic idea seems to fix a lot of other issues in physics. It's just an idea
The truth is whats important, the science world is full of Ego orientated battles. Is it one's ego that is the main motivator for finding the truth? or is it for the benefit of mankind?
So... while in one universe there is a black hole sucking all arround, on the other side (a parallel universe) there is a "white hole" expanding and forming a new universe from the sucked matter of the black hole. To me, make sensse. What do you think?
@mercadotecnico but this would make the exit point for the "white hole" and that subsequent universe -where the information was being taken -or expelled infinatley large ...because if all of that information is ending up there -there would have to be an infinate amount of room for all of that information...and essentially every other universe would eventually cease to reside in this reality -and would reside in that one instead?
There's a good chance that Hawking's newest theory on black holes may be proven correct thru string & M theory. If this is the case, then the big bang was in effect formed from a black hole that transmitted the singularity via string to our physical membrane. The hard part will be proving this theory. CERN just started colliding particles again & we're not even sure if dark matter, the graviton or the Higgs Boson is real yet.
The real paradox here is that with Hawking's condition worsening, and his ability to communicate deteriorating, the answers to the problems that concern the fundamental workings of the universe may become, in essence, "trapped" in his head. The universe is quite a large burden for one man to hold.
@SuperiorDirty I reserve hope that brain-reading technology will essentially solve that problem. If anything Hawking can be the very incentive to catapults it into practical use and into the market. Time will tell...
Instead of trying to figure out if information is lost in a black hole how about trying to figure out how were going to get rid of our own garbage once all the landfills are full. Put that into you black hole theory and smoke it.
have you ever thought about the fact that that's his JOB to figure things like that out and not about solving our garbage problems? . put that in your head and smoke it. :D
I personally think that the idea of a black hole destroys information as it evaporated is off, but I also think that the idea that the information is preserved by the event horizon is off. For 1, it doesn't explain what happens to the information once it is in the black hole, nor the reason for the loss of data in the black hole once it starts to evaporate.
In addition: What I think is that if the black hole evaporated by radiating heat as is stated in the first part, then wouldn't the information just be converted from mass into energy as radiant heat?
what if the black hole matter that 'disappeared' actually was all in the same universe, just that it goes to the center of expansion of the universe(as in no multiverses) (assuming the universe is expanding)
This was an extremely stupid program and an utter waste of time. Why can't anyone make programs on this stuff that can speak to the lay audience that isn't mentally handicapped(like many of you commenters here)?
@Zeldovich Unfortunately this program was made for the layman, and if you want to get a better understanding of this discussion, go read The Black Hole War by Susskind
@Zeldovich They do, check out easy to understand programs like the one Carl Sagan had on the air. Otherwise just stick to whatever you do understand, and leave this kind of stuff to the people who really want to know the answer to the universe. I don't think you can "laymenize" multiple dimensions or universal constants and limits. Don't call things that are above your intelligence stupid. I don't think you could've made a bigger fool of yourself.
@Zeldovich so you need analogies to understand multiple dimensions? Honestly Flatlands is an analogy MUCH more easily understood by people who don't want to understand it our reality. Sure you might get something out of it, but honestly it makes alot more sense in the physical world you and I both share. If you feel Flatland is a good book for understanding the information paradox, i think maybe you just arn't cut out for this type of thinking... once again.
You mentioned "multiple dimensions or universal constants and limits", which doesn't even make sense, but that's beside the point. Flatland will tell you more about how to think about extra dimensions than this garbage.
@Zeldovich I think that is where we stop then. You can no longer understand the ideas that are being described to you. I agree some of these things can be extremely abstract, don't hurt yourself ok?
@Zeldovich Yes, lets move from your lack of understanding and try to point out things I "MAY" not know the difference between.... That will prove your point.. you must be a superior debater. Lets call you the Master of Bating. Do you like my style of arguing who knows best? I learned it from you =) All joking aside, fallacies are fun.
lol You still don't know the difference between perturbation theory and nonlinear dynamics, do you dumbass? So now you want to change the subject? lol
@Zeldovich look... I'm really sorry you didn't understand this video. Its really made for the masses. Perturbation theory in a simple sentence is: taking the answer and finding out he question or derivation. non linear dynamics says it doesn't have to be sequential (aka linear) so you cannot rely on perturbation theory. If you want a better explanation you can pay me to write you a complete report on it so your asininity doesn't show. PLEASE LEARN how to avoid logical fallacies in argument.
@Brandonduboff how do you create nothing? BTW why do things fall? I know how they fall, but i have never seen an explanation to why they fall. Yes i know curvature of space/time, but again why do they fall not float? *maybe mater is really just floating upon piles of space/time? (its just an arbitrary +/- of direction) but does turn our view of the universe upside-down.
If nothing else, Mr. Hawking's condition/mind/celebrity brought these ideas to the masses. So what if his brilliance was laquered w/ his disability? Richard Feynman's work in quantum physics gained him a fair amount of celebrity, as well--but when was it that the world of science hinged itself upon how many books got sold? Credibility is *not* based on fame...And physicists should be more than happy to have their concepts broadcast by this mascot of sorts.
Come on! He is a scientist and his joy is to be guided by a great master. I am sure he do it with pleasure. So, please do not feel sorry either. Enjoy the life my friend.
Information is not lost, it's just backed up in a parallel universe like a SkyDrive. Actually it's more like a infinite parallel universe RAID. That means that in the beginning of time there was not a big bang but a Big Boot that kickstarted it all.
The best person to be guiding Hawking should be Susskind. I'm sure Mr Hawking would think considerably faster if his intellectual opponent but personal friend was to be next to him.
As for the issue of infinities, well, that is something maths as it is now does not address well.
Hawking and Susskind may not be enemies but they are nott best buddies either. As they disagree strongly I find it hard to picture Susskind sitting there going: Defined...described...do you want a V? Do you want a V Stephen? No... a G?...a D?.. a B?..bullshit? Is that what you are trying to say Stephen? That this is a bullshit idea?
That has got to be one of the funniest things I have ever read in my entire life!! Congratulations on nearly suffocating me form a distance with your humor. I don't remember the last time I laughed that hard!:)
@MPETE1976 its easy for people to mock him but imo i doubt anyone of those other sceintists could of attained the same level of achievement in the realm of sceince if they had the same condition...does it look easy living in that body......-_-
@clovelywindheaven Yeah, I think we learned that the world of physics is populated by catty bitches, jealous of his fame. If Susskind & others really want to understand the universe, I should think they would work with Hawking as best they can, rather than whinge about him getting more publicity than they do. I have little doubt that Einstein, were he alive, would be spending time conversing with Hawking.
Haha Sure this is exciting material to learn but as a 20 year old female physic and math major I can't keep my eyes off Christophe Galfard...He's so hot. :D
How else would the scientific society justifying wasting the tax payers moneys, my friend?
By all respect, I believe there are many corrupt links between science and governments all around the globe and they call it serving humanity's FUTURE, while millions people are fighting TODAY just to survive the day.
I quit my job that was in such corrupt environment and love specially the days I have no money in my wallet.
I wonder why this series focuses so much on Hawkings reputation while he himself doesn't. Status is irrelevant. The only thing that matters i science is proof.
there's no proof in science, proof can only be found in the subject of mathematics. Science works with theories, levels of certainty, prediction power, and, more importantly... evidence.
Light, or photons, is affected by gravity. Thus, at the event horizon of a black whole, light will lack the energy to escape. I don't think you really grasp the idea of what a black whole really is lol.
The simple Julia set in chaos theory actually gave me this idea; at first I thought if black holes were eating all information, the universe(s) as we know it would dissappear forever; but thankfully, and thanks to our good friend Steven Hawking, that the true realism of physics holds true, and information, and thus life, is preservered, perhaps in new unborn universes.
(I was cutoff using mrzeta007) - I now use chaos theory to design a communication device to search for other life ! MrZeta
Think of black holes taking information and sending it to another universe, and exploding it like a big bang there. One of the new big bang theories suggest an hour-glass type universe, with all matter existing on the surface of the hour glass; and where there is empty space, lie black holes connecting our hour glass universe with other one or more universes.
@MrZeta007 I really have no significant knowledge about physics. I mostly 'consume' simple documentaries like this one, despite being pretty fascinated by space and it's workings. However, through some years of getting into contact with this subject, I've formed an image of black holes that's pretty similar to what you described: a black hole in our universe converges into a single point, from where it expands again into a different place in this universe, or just into a different universe.
Chaos theory suggests that information can be scattered and still reproduce exactly and perfectly even though there is no seemingly direct connectedness; this had me baffled. Then my childhood days of studying black holes had me thinking as I listened to this video series, and in fact I can offer a solution. The idea of multiple universes would be nice; in fact, if it is true, it will be 'existance's' only chance for 'non-randomess' survuval!! end pt 2
I have always been fans of Feynman and Hawking; and of course Einstein. The black hole theories are in the least very astounding. I myself study advanced physics, but havnt touched on black holes as I am more 'close to earth'. My new research involves the study of quantum electrodynamics, the inter-relatinships between waves and particles using wave theory to derive particle location in space and time, and finally, the study of randomness, chaos and complexity theory. end pt1
I know of only a few that knows Overall Science better then me: I must confirm your statement.
Also theories that can't be tested at present have a problem: Withour concrete Sciencetific Evidence from Experiments, no theory can be confirmed, and must remain a story.
Science is suppose to look at evidence, and then test it. However in Astronomy and Plantology especailly, testing is out ot any reasonable question.
And an other personal question. Can be there black holes in magnetism also like the gravity ones? Do magnetism affect the time space as gravity does? While electromagnetism is an other force of the nature. Can be at last a theoritically magnetic black hole?
Until the end of physics (if one believes that there is an end), I believe that the human ability to pose questions is the reason why science has came so far. We should learn to appreciate problems and people who set them as those who solve them, because both are equally important.
U can do et!
DurexDurpaneu2 2 weeks ago
does anyone know the song that plays around the 5 minute mark when it explains his new idea? sounds epic.
risenreaper21 1 month ago
Too bad nobody told Hawking and these other physicists that the most important thing one can do in life - aside from service to others - is to choose rightly which god to believe in - one is real and the other isn't.
gukonni 2 months ago
@gukonni I thought there were more than two to choose from. To which two are you refering? Personally I worship Bhaal the demon lord of entropy ... please tell me i picked the right one, you've got me worried now!
BagarozziBoi 1 month ago
@gukonni Yes because thousand year old myths, rejected by the smartest people on Earth, are the most important thing in life....
OddOpinion 1 week ago
@gukonni in your mind god is real in others its debated and challenged whats wrong with that. koolaid drinking idiot I go on whats been proven not written in a book. books often brainwash people. start thinking for yourself instead taking easy route. i study physics religion paranormal stuff Hawking is Genuis and i seen crazy stuff happen who is right will prob be never be known prob until you die.
garymonay 1 week ago
Comment removed
gukonni 2 months ago
Comment removed
gukonni 2 months ago
Time and speed are reciprocal. the faster you move time slows down
TzzX78 2 months ago
this is the most ridiculous cop out I've ever heard. Susskind's explanation was so much better in the first place. its too bad that he's too arrogant to admit that he's wrong and has to make up an outlandish claim to prove himself. its also too bad that no one says anything because of his condition. come on people one man's health is not as important as the knowledge that true science can provide
jessmikekaetzelrog 4 months ago
a christian friend of mine told me Hawking was sick as a curse from god for being an athiest. I wanted to slap him what about the 100's of other famous physicists did you god forget to curse them?
maocapoeira 5 months ago 3
@maocapoeira i can say as a christian myself that the whole curse thing is stupid and unbiblicaly founded
photonman54 4 months ago
i think the best part is that he went and announced to everyone in the scientific community that he was wrong. he has taken a step that people can not, due to their ego.
kelbykross1 5 months ago
HAHA! U CAN'T KILL THIS MAN! HE IS LIKE A HUMAN GOD OF SCIENCE! DEFIES DEATH. WHAT A WONDERFUL MAN.
ervin920 7 months ago 6
when they buckled him in on the left side i thought he was driving, i was like, no fucking way!!
Shadapaga 8 months ago 2
So a wrong claim and his illness made him famous not a convincing scientific fact.After watching the full programme I still hasn't fully grasped the essence of it.
doczak69 8 months ago
It's a shame that a mind like his is trapped in a nearly useless body, while useless minds are able to make use of a perfectly useful body.
clgrnt 9 months ago 62
@clgrnt I just wonder if Hawking had had the same reputation and success without the body disorder that made him unique to the entire world
Thatmetaldude590 8 months ago
Comment removed
BagarozziBoi 1 month ago
@Thatmetaldude590 And in maths nowadays it's even more grim. Who's heard of Wiles for example, (proved Fermat's last theorem). This is partly because modern maths and physics are so vast and varied nowadays that since about the 60's is very difficult for "giants" of the field to emerge. Perhaps Feynman/Schwinger/Gell-Mann etc were the leading figures of the final 'epic' generation.
BagarozziBoi 1 month ago
@BagarozziBoi True, though I'm uncertain if that's negative. If the number of people within mathematics increase, either in percentage or number, that would still make a collective development that single individuals might not be able to achieve on their own. Although I believe one can expect notorious scientists and mathematicians to emerge in any near future anyway.
Thatmetaldude590 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Thatmetaldude590 In the physics community his reputation would have been more or less the same, perhaps a tiny bit less due to the human factor, but his work is his work. To the general public of course not, they haven't heard of Witten or Susskind, are hardly aware of figures like Penrose or Higgs, and Higgs only because he has something tangible named after him that gives them something to latch onto.
BagarozziBoi 1 month ago
@clgrnt Very well said my friend. I wish I could thumb + that comment until everyone reads it.
Johannson6990 7 months ago
@clgrnt what do you mean, you people ?
asktamama 7 months ago
@clgrnt in useless ways too.
ZachRose88 5 months ago
@clgrnt ironic aint it?
zxzc77 4 months ago
@clgrnt because of his useless body he can think and imagine much better and he uses it to his advantage, it is mentioned in part 2 or 3 i think
keval7000 1 month ago
@clgrnt WELL SAID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
buzsub03 1 month ago
Do anyone know if anything has happened since this documentary?
vaaaliant 9 months ago
@vaaaliant he went 6 times to the bathroom and his wife jerkim' off twice.
thelargge 8 months ago
I think his physical condition helps him to focus on physics so much.
If he would get a strong, healthy body, he would spend most of his time in night clubs chasing chicks.
nadoeloiskat 9 months ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Someday everything will be reveal and known. Is not what you know. Is how you use what you know.
sevendiamantes 10 months ago
Someday everything will be reveal and known. Is not what you know. Is how you use what you know that matters.
sevendiamantes 10 months ago
Someday everything will be reveal and known.
sevendiamantes 10 months ago
Awesome ty.
sweetmonkeylove1 10 months ago
i watched it all!
bboyHarrypotter 10 months ago
Imagine if somehow his condition could be reversed. He would be able to make spectacular progress! He would be able to get his ideas out with the speed at which his mind works. It's tragic, but without his ALS, he would have never been able to contemplate the mysteries of the universe so deeply and been forced to see it as a tangible force instead of an equation.
stilettosandshades 11 months ago
To be honest, I am somewhat skeptical of Stephen Hawking himself. It is clear that he could not function without the help of his research grad students. He appears to guide their work to some degree, but I have to wonder the degree to which Hawking's "New Work" is really just the work of grad students stamped with Hawking's "Lucasian Seal of Approval," if you will.
In my opinion, it seems like the grad students are really the ones doing all of the math.
Th3oryOf3v3ryThing 11 months ago
@Th3oryOf3v3ryThing If Hawking succeeds to teach these students so they become as brilliant as he was/is, then this is still a brilliant thing. Of course then the names on the papers should be in a different order.
blenderpanzi 11 months ago
surfxeo, btw, i dont see any connection between the existence of black holes and the lack of evidence in support of gravity which holds it together, call it what you want, the black hole is still there, whether in cosmos or Einstein's scientific work or both remains to be seen:-)
what comes out of a black hole, the dust of space, energy and stuff like that, me think
audiojunkiehu 11 months ago
leonard susskind is a beast
TheFaceOfJohnPants 11 months ago
please tell stephen to look for what comes out of a black hole, what stays in and what went in. information loss happens all the time, no black hole needed, just look at what will happen with my reco:-)
audiojunkiehu 11 months ago
I was surprised to hear Hawking say that Black holes don't exist. I have been having the same suspicion about the non existence of black holes. Science is supposed to work from observation and yet no one has ever seen a black hole. Einstein only added the black hole hypothesis to make his theory work and yet he was honest to admit he didn't really believe in there existence. And gravity is thousand billion billion billion weaker than the electromagnetic force, so light not escaping is false.
Surfxeo 1 year ago
@Surfxeo So, if there are no black holes, then what is at the center of most galaxies or our galaxy? What has the mass of 4 million times that of our sun, that we cannot see and has S2 (the closest star to the center of our galaxy)whipping around it at 3100 miles a sec? What else could it be?
stilettosandshades 11 months ago
@stilettosandshades Gravity is the weakest of the 4 forces of physics therefore its effects are negligible compared with the other over riding forces.
It only has that mass according to theoretical mathematical formula but has not any empirical evidence to support that assumption. I have an hypothesis what it might be based on plasma physics, which relates to the binary star problem.
Surfxeo 11 months ago
If you want to know more about this other understanding of cosmology I recommend you search plasma cosmology or the electrical universe. I was skeptical at first until I started seeing repeatable testable theories that can be backed up by observation and predictions.
Surfxeo 11 months ago
@stilettosandshades you wouldn't want to know...
thelargge 8 months ago
Stop trying to stroke your own egos and focus on how you might be able to assist these important men in doing their job better if even possible.The important thing is they are all working for the better of man and (in some cases) a much less important legacy. Whether or not they are right or wrong does not matter. The small steps they take to understand the universe are what matters. Maybe they should learn to understand that too(hawking AND Susskind). Collaboration is what got us here today.
XionosOrigin 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
......was wondering if anyone may have considered whether or not Hawking "lied" about being wrong at that conference because he didnt want his legacy to be a formula that unwound the basic laws of physics?...think about his answer..."only if there multi universes".
paul1820 6 minutes ago paul1820 6 minutes ago
paul1820 1 year ago
I think black holes just transport the information not eat or destroy it
dude40299 1 year ago
Blackholes have a singularity and will shink into non existance
Blackholes could be an intermediate period in the life cycle
Picture The 11th dimension as a miniscule ultraviolet belt of life.
Billionth of a millimeter wide, carrying energy flow from expiring life sources,
across dimensional space
Life forms enter the 11th dimension(blackhole?) after a period of
non activity(death)
This would explain the Blackhole Equation (alive and dead at the same time).
11thDim 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Blackholes have a singularity that will shink to non existance.
Blackholes could be an intermediate period in the life cycle
Picture The 11th dimension as a miniscule ultraviolet belt of life.
A billionth of a millimeter wide, carrying the energy flow from expiring life sources,
across dimensional space. Life forms enter the 11th dimension(could be a blackhole?) after a period of
non activity(death).
This would explain the Blackhole Equation (alive and dead at the same time).
11thDim 1 year ago
This is a bit too weird. parallel universes where black holes dont exist. Could a universe even exist without black holes and even if they did, what significance would those universes have for "preserving information". And lastly but not leastly how in hell could you ever prove any of it. You might as well be telling fairy tales.
mijav2 1 year ago
So there are blackholes, then there are no blackholes. Scientists don't make any sense, they are pussyholes.
FukMySweetPussy 1 year ago
This war is over. Susskind et al were correct and the non-loss of information due to the holograph principle has resolved it. Susskind wrote a book about it 2 years ago. This set of videos is enlightening, covers most of Susskind's book, and is 3 years old. Hence, Hawking's 2010 book on the universe and creation, The Grand Design
rochestermiusa 1 year ago
I respect Susskind but he should give Steven some slack, the guy is crippled and is not able to write up and hash out his ideas as fast as an ablebodied scientist of his caliber would. I absolutely love the multi-universe theory, the M-theory. It clears up everything so nicely and elegantly. A blackhole in essence turns into an object eerly similar to a singularity, literally funneling information from this universe to another, with no hope of return.
vladbcom 1 year ago
"hole world waits" hehe. -_-
Serethen 1 year ago
my black hole is exit only!
urbandenizen 1 year ago
what the hell is information? and how did they know that this information exist in first place? So if the information can not be destroyed it can not be created. When the matter changes its shape or function, that is information lost. All of this is not problem of mine and seem to be BULLSHI.
hykovachev 1 year ago
@hykovachev - Hey, Harry Potter is out soon!!
Mike51020 1 year ago
@hykovachev Well since you are not a physicist, and you have no idea what the word information means in a scientific context, no one cares whether you think it's bullshit. They can't expound on all of theoretical physics in a short TV program. If you really care go and take a physics course, and if you don't care enough to try and understand keep your opinions to yourself.
hooloovoo1st 1 year ago
@hooloovoo1st ......was wondering if anyone may have considered whether or not Hawking "lied" about being wrong at that conference because he didnt want his legacy to be a formula that unwound the basic laws of physics?...think about his answer..."only if there multi universes".
paul1820 1 year ago
hawking is fucked up but with a smart brain what a fuckin shame!
lmonto 1 year ago
@MPETE1976 You're an idiot.
joseftran 1 year ago
I want to believe that Stephen Hawking has a more complex system for navigating his way around a computer. By what I've seen in these videos, it seems that he is browsing through a computer by pushing the equivalent of the TAB key to get the desired result. Not only is that slow and primitive, but I know for a fact that there are navigation tools (such as video cameras detecting eye motion or muscle sensors) that would make it easier for him to use a computer and to write down his ideas faster.
nanturadu 1 year ago 2
This paradox is about the reversibility of information, or, reconstructing the matter after it has entered the event horizon. The information about the matter might either be lost (as per Hawking) or cannot be lost as it violates principles of quantum mechanics. One solution Hawking has proposed here is that the information may be re-constructed (after admitting that information indeed is not lost once matter goes inside the event horizon), but by taking into picture parallel universes...
krishna10ak 1 year ago
This paradox is about the reversibility of information, or, reconstructing the matter after it has entered the event horizon. The information about the matter might either be lost (as per Hawking) or cannot be lost as it violates principles of quantum mechanics. One solution Hawking has proposed here is that the information may be re-constructed (after admitting that information indeed is not lost once matter goes inside the event horizon), but by taking into picture parallel universes...
krishna10ak 1 year ago
This paradox is about the reversibility of information, or, reconstructing the matter after it has entered the event horizon. The information about the matter might either be lost (as per Hawking) or cannot be lost as it violates principles of quantum mechanics. One solution Hawking has proposed here is that the information may be re-constructed (after admitting that information indeed is not lost once matter goes inside the event horizon), but by taking into picture parallel universes...
krishna10ak 1 year ago
the paradox is about the reversibility of information, or to say, reconstructing the matter after it has entered the event horizon. the information about the matter might either be lost (as per Hawking) or cannot be lost as it violates principles of quantum gravity. One solution Hawking has proposed here is from the information may be re-constructed (after admitting that information indeed is not lost once matter goes inside the event horizon). hope this pans out into something more meaningful.
krishna10ak 1 year ago
damn, i genuinly feel bad for hawking, all that knowlege and intelligence trapped inside his head, it must be frustrating having to take so long to put conclusions on to paper
MrSweatyZombie 1 year ago
i mean the unverse
FreeeeS 1 year ago
We can contemplate science but first you need to speak in science which is MATH :P
FreeeeS 1 year ago
Hawking was right from the beginning. It is absrd to say that information is retained in the ring of the event horizon. This is crazy. If the black hole is so powerful that nothing can defy it, not even light, then how can information be preserved? And even if it were preserved, who would be the fool to go and gather it? Sassking? He' d be a fool to go even near, thus even if the info may be preserved in the edge of the black hole, still it is irretreivable.
6SpAr6TAN69 1 year ago
@6SpAr6TAN69 i dont understand what they mean by the "information being preserved on the event horizon" isnt there a jet that escapes the black hole?? theres a jet that emits particles out of black hole, maybe thats all the stuff that got sucked in, but crushed into such small particles that theres some stuff we cannot detect, sprayed out into space, then re-forms into stars eventually, idunno im not an expert but i like to think about stuff like this
MrSweatyZombie 1 year ago
@MrSweatyZombie the vents are stuff that is diverted away from the black hole due to magnefic field reasons, not sucked in, so the stuff that is sucked in should maintain a signature within the black hole, i.e. in the event horizon. it's same reason Hawking said that once the BH dies there is no signature remaining, but Susskind somehow proved otherwise.
6SpAr6TAN69 1 year ago
I want a dos x now
AlexiLaihoRules 1 year ago
The sound effects are from DOOM
breaneainn 1 year ago
@flippitydoo As for the week between my responses... I work, make lots of money, and simply respond to you because it is amusing to hear you try to defend your position. Once again, I'm really sorry you didn't understand this video. Its made for the laymen people and sadly enough you may be even below that level of specialized intelligence.
Brandonduboff 1 year ago
@Brandonduboff woops this was supposed to be zeldobitch's name, not flippitydoo
Brandonduboff 1 year ago
@Zeldovich you think I googled that? So I guess you knew my major in college, and all about the rest of my personal life. As for what fallacies you have committed- you have committed the Red Herring and Ad Hominem, and Personal attacks. Aside from the traditional logical fallacies, you assume my : intelligence, what I am doing on the internet, things that do not make sense to you must be wrong, and that your precious Flatlands is anything other than a boring and amusing metaphorical novel.
Brandonduboff 1 year ago
How the fuck can you be world wide famous and prestiegious and rich as a rats ass and you cant hire some scientists to do some gene therapy on your fuckin spinal cord I dont fuckin understand. the technology is out there its 2010 godammit
NebunLaCap 1 year ago
@NebunLaCap: What therapy for ALS are you proposing? Please be specific,
sbergman27 1 year ago
ppl say he went down to rank 20... but shit ppl were working on was shit he came up with lol
myth1c 1 year ago
I am uninformed, but it seems to me we are looking that things wrong. Maybe space is being created, and that the center of a black-hole is being created faster then the mater can occupy it. Gravity between 2 objects is inverse(^2), radius sphere inverse(^3). one can see, how at distance the gravity-curve would be greater, and at very close ranges the Increase in a sphere's volume vs radius curve could be larger. The basic idea seems to fix a lot of other issues in physics. It's just an idea
masluxx 1 year ago
Comment removed
Brandonduboff 1 year ago
Hawking got owned
fix520 1 year ago
The truth is whats important, the science world is full of Ego orientated battles. Is it one's ego that is the main motivator for finding the truth? or is it for the benefit of mankind?
HabloIrlandes 1 year ago
he should take lsd before he passes to help him understand the universe he needs to bring the universe into his mind
dalepelser 1 year ago
He should have been a professor in genetic reconstruction, that way, he could present his ideas himself.
Multimorten 1 year ago
i hope he solves the problem he posed.
MrHalo32009 1 year ago
he's wasting his time.. he'l never unlock the secrets of the universe
david1550123 1 year ago
So... while in one universe there is a black hole sucking all arround, on the other side (a parallel universe) there is a "white hole" expanding and forming a new universe from the sucked matter of the black hole. To me, make sensse. What do you think?
mercadotecnico 1 year ago
@mercadotecnico but this would make the exit point for the "white hole" and that subsequent universe -where the information was being taken -or expelled infinatley large ...because if all of that information is ending up there -there would have to be an infinate amount of room for all of that information...and essentially every other universe would eventually cease to reside in this reality -and would reside in that one instead?
livethemetal4449 1 year ago
It was just an announcement, by Stephen Hawkings...
audiojunkiehu 1 year ago
what if the univers has many answers ?
dalefantom 1 year ago
There's a good chance that Hawking's newest theory on black holes may be proven correct thru string & M theory. If this is the case, then the big bang was in effect formed from a black hole that transmitted the singularity via string to our physical membrane. The hard part will be proving this theory. CERN just started colliding particles again & we're not even sure if dark matter, the graviton or the Higgs Boson is real yet.
UnReALVeNoM 1 year ago
love the music around 2:11 anyone know what it is?
L33tr30w 1 year ago
The real paradox here is that with Hawking's condition worsening, and his ability to communicate deteriorating, the answers to the problems that concern the fundamental workings of the universe may become, in essence, "trapped" in his head. The universe is quite a large burden for one man to hold.
SuperiorDirty 1 year ago 37
@SuperiorDirty While an interesting idea, that is not a paradox.
cinnabarbarian 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SuperiorDirty While an interesting concept, that is not a paradox.
cinnabarbarian 1 year ago
@SuperiorDirty I reserve hope that brain-reading technology will essentially solve that problem. If anything Hawking can be the very incentive to catapults it into practical use and into the market. Time will tell...
RammerM 1 year ago
@SuperiorDirty
Indeed.
I hope people are actually working on keeping him alive longer and making him function better.
Now this is KIND OF a joke, but if anyone found out how to make someone immortal, right now would be the best time.
RCD608 1 year ago 2
Instead of trying to figure out if information is lost in a black hole how about trying to figure out how were going to get rid of our own garbage once all the landfills are full. Put that into you black hole theory and smoke it.
killersushi99 1 year ago
absolute idiot
jayice92 1 year ago
have you ever thought about the fact that that's his JOB to figure things like that out and not about solving our garbage problems? . put that in your head and smoke it. :D
jetlagsyndrome 1 year ago
I personally think that the idea of a black hole destroys information as it evaporated is off, but I also think that the idea that the information is preserved by the event horizon is off. For 1, it doesn't explain what happens to the information once it is in the black hole, nor the reason for the loss of data in the black hole once it starts to evaporate.
zetsumeinaito 1 year ago
In addition: What I think is that if the black hole evaporated by radiating heat as is stated in the first part, then wouldn't the information just be converted from mass into energy as radiant heat?
zetsumeinaito 1 year ago
what if the black hole matter that 'disappeared' actually was all in the same universe, just that it goes to the center of expansion of the universe(as in no multiverses) (assuming the universe is expanding)
noreaction1 2 years ago
This was an extremely stupid program and an utter waste of time. Why can't anyone make programs on this stuff that can speak to the lay audience that isn't mentally handicapped(like many of you commenters here)?
Zeldovich 2 years ago
@Zeldovich Unfortunately this program was made for the layman, and if you want to get a better understanding of this discussion, go read The Black Hole War by Susskind
undeadwolf66 1 year ago 2
@undeadwolf66
Good call. Yeah, I've watched some of Susskind's physics lectures.
Zeldovich 1 year ago
@Zeldovich They do, check out easy to understand programs like the one Carl Sagan had on the air. Otherwise just stick to whatever you do understand, and leave this kind of stuff to the people who really want to know the answer to the universe. I don't think you can "laymenize" multiple dimensions or universal constants and limits. Don't call things that are above your intelligence stupid. I don't think you could've made a bigger fool of yourself.
Brandonduboff 1 year ago 2
@Brandonduboff
lol Above my intelligence, moron? Even the book Flatland demonstrates this can be better done.
Zeldovich 1 year ago
@Zeldovich so you need analogies to understand multiple dimensions? Honestly Flatlands is an analogy MUCH more easily understood by people who don't want to understand it our reality. Sure you might get something out of it, but honestly it makes alot more sense in the physical world you and I both share. If you feel Flatland is a good book for understanding the information paradox, i think maybe you just arn't cut out for this type of thinking... once again.
Brandonduboff 1 year ago
@Brandonduboff
You mentioned "multiple dimensions or universal constants and limits", which doesn't even make sense, but that's beside the point. Flatland will tell you more about how to think about extra dimensions than this garbage.
Zeldovich 1 year ago
@Zeldovich I think that is where we stop then. You can no longer understand the ideas that are being described to you. I agree some of these things can be extremely abstract, don't hurt yourself ok?
Brandonduboff 1 year ago
@Brandonduboff
You've demonstrated no understanding whatsoever with regard to anything. lol
You probably don't even know the difference between perturbation theory and nonlinear dynamics.
Zeldovich 1 year ago
@Zeldovich Yes, lets move from your lack of understanding and try to point out things I "MAY" not know the difference between.... That will prove your point.. you must be a superior debater. Lets call you the Master of Bating. Do you like my style of arguing who knows best? I learned it from you =) All joking aside, fallacies are fun.
Brandonduboff 1 year ago
@Brandonduboff
lol You still don't know the difference between perturbation theory and nonlinear dynamics, do you dumbass? So now you want to change the subject? lol
Zeldovich 1 year ago
@Zeldovich I do, I am just sad that you don't understand how to debate properly...
Brandonduboff 1 year ago
@Brandonduboff
Tell me about perturbation theory versus nonlinear dynamics then.
Zeldovich 1 year ago
@Zeldovich look... I'm really sorry you didn't understand this video. Its really made for the masses. Perturbation theory in a simple sentence is: taking the answer and finding out he question or derivation. non linear dynamics says it doesn't have to be sequential (aka linear) so you cannot rely on perturbation theory. If you want a better explanation you can pay me to write you a complete report on it so your asininity doesn't show. PLEASE LEARN how to avoid logical fallacies in argument.
Brandonduboff 1 year ago
@Brandonduboff
LOL You come back after a week of googlling, after first dodging the question and think you can be convincing with your answer? lmao
Tell me exactly which logical fallacies I made above.
Zeldovich 1 year ago
@Brandonduboff Stop arguing with this guy. It's obvious he doesn't know how to debate without showing off his talons to prove a point.
heroclix0rz 1 year ago
@Zeldovich btw you changed the topic before I ever did.
Brandonduboff 1 year ago
@Brandonduboff how do you create nothing? BTW why do things fall? I know how they fall, but i have never seen an explanation to why they fall. Yes i know curvature of space/time, but again why do they fall not float? *maybe mater is really just floating upon piles of space/time? (its just an arbitrary +/- of direction) but does turn our view of the universe upside-down.
masluxx 1 year ago
@Zeldovich Try and watch all 5 parts in sequence. I am not into physics, but I understood everything.
Metalloys 1 year ago
This string theory explanation is rather weak.
tallsmile28 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrDoublehappy 2 years ago
@MrDoublehappy
If nothing else, Mr. Hawking's condition/mind/celebrity brought these ideas to the masses. So what if his brilliance was laquered w/ his disability? Richard Feynman's work in quantum physics gained him a fair amount of celebrity, as well--but when was it that the world of science hinged itself upon how many books got sold? Credibility is *not* based on fame...And physicists should be more than happy to have their concepts broadcast by this mascot of sorts.
MindSprite 2 years ago
ok so be it
MrDoublehappy 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrDoublehappy 2 years ago
Come on! He is a scientist and his joy is to be guided by a great master. I am sure he do it with pleasure. So, please do not feel sorry either. Enjoy the life my friend.
Merry Christmas
live4Cha 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrDoublehappy 2 years ago
fuck off you bitter prick
cheeky57 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrDoublehappy 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrDoublehappy 2 years ago
LOL calm down man!
im the bitter one? "IM DEAD"
go cry to your mom
cheeky57 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrDoublehappy 2 years ago
I figured this out.
Information is not lost, it's just backed up in a parallel universe like a SkyDrive. Actually it's more like a infinite parallel universe RAID. That means that in the beginning of time there was not a big bang but a Big Boot that kickstarted it all.
That's my claim. So there, disprove it.
MPETE1976 2 years ago 3
The best person to be guiding Hawking should be Susskind. I'm sure Mr Hawking would think considerably faster if his intellectual opponent but personal friend was to be next to him.
As for the issue of infinities, well, that is something maths as it is now does not address well.
soccom8341576 2 years ago 3
Hawking and Susskind may not be enemies but they are nott best buddies either. As they disagree strongly I find it hard to picture Susskind sitting there going: Defined...described...do you want a V? Do you want a V Stephen? No... a G?...a D?.. a B?..bullshit? Is that what you are trying to say Stephen? That this is a bullshit idea?
MPETE1976 2 years ago 17
I'm pretty sure Susskind is a nicer person than that.
Then again, I don't see why they couldn't be using instant messaging to bounce ideas.
soccom8341576 2 years ago
That has got to be one of the funniest things I have ever read in my entire life!! Congratulations on nearly suffocating me form a distance with your humor. I don't remember the last time I laughed that hard!:)
KRIPKRIP420 2 years ago
@MPETE1976 That is hilarious!!!! I agree the last thing Susskind wants to do is interpret Hawking.
tallsmile28 2 years ago
@MPETE1976 its easy for people to mock him but imo i doubt anyone of those other sceintists could of attained the same level of achievement in the realm of sceince if they had the same condition...does it look easy living in that body......-_-
clovelywindheaven 1 year ago 28
@clovelywindheaven Yeah, I think we learned that the world of physics is populated by catty bitches, jealous of his fame. If Susskind & others really want to understand the universe, I should think they would work with Hawking as best they can, rather than whinge about him getting more publicity than they do. I have little doubt that Einstein, were he alive, would be spending time conversing with Hawking.
GoreyFantod 7 months ago
@GoreyFantod
'Yeah, I think we learned that the world of physics is populated by catty bitches, jealous of his fame.'
Well said sir, well said.
bobshouse123 4 months ago
Haha Sure this is exciting material to learn but as a 20 year old female physic and math major I can't keep my eyes off Christophe Galfard...He's so hot. :D
voltaAsh 2 years ago
@voltaAsh ah shuddup XD
ers3031q90z 2 years ago
ditto ^.^
ih4t3l33t 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrDoublehappy 2 years ago
How else would the scientific society justifying wasting the tax payers moneys, my friend?
By all respect, I believe there are many corrupt links between science and governments all around the globe and they call it serving humanity's FUTURE, while millions people are fighting TODAY just to survive the day.
I quit my job that was in such corrupt environment and love specially the days I have no money in my wallet.
:-)
live4Cha 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrDoublehappy 2 years ago
@voltaAsh - nice try spambot.
acfacf4321 1 year ago
i don't get this rofl
equallyeasilyfuqyou 2 years ago
I wonder why this series focuses so much on Hawkings reputation while he himself doesn't. Status is irrelevant. The only thing that matters i science is proof.
gnarfsan 2 years ago
there's no proof in science, proof can only be found in the subject of mathematics. Science works with theories, levels of certainty, prediction power, and, more importantly... evidence.
rclxor 2 years ago
Light, or photons, is affected by gravity. Thus, at the event horizon of a black whole, light will lack the energy to escape. I don't think you really grasp the idea of what a black whole really is lol.
chiwiitube 2 years ago
The simple Julia set in chaos theory actually gave me this idea; at first I thought if black holes were eating all information, the universe(s) as we know it would dissappear forever; but thankfully, and thanks to our good friend Steven Hawking, that the true realism of physics holds true, and information, and thus life, is preservered, perhaps in new unborn universes.
(I was cutoff using mrzeta007) - I now use chaos theory to design a communication device to search for other life ! MrZeta
IberianRyder 2 years ago
Think of black holes taking information and sending it to another universe, and exploding it like a big bang there. One of the new big bang theories suggest an hour-glass type universe, with all matter existing on the surface of the hour glass; and where there is empty space, lie black holes connecting our hour glass universe with other one or more universes.
end pt 3
MrZeta007 2 years ago
@MrZeta007 I really have no significant knowledge about physics. I mostly 'consume' simple documentaries like this one, despite being pretty fascinated by space and it's workings. However, through some years of getting into contact with this subject, I've formed an image of black holes that's pretty similar to what you described: a black hole in our universe converges into a single point, from where it expands again into a different place in this universe, or just into a different universe.
xTheRevisionistx 1 year ago
Chaos theory suggests that information can be scattered and still reproduce exactly and perfectly even though there is no seemingly direct connectedness; this had me baffled. Then my childhood days of studying black holes had me thinking as I listened to this video series, and in fact I can offer a solution. The idea of multiple universes would be nice; in fact, if it is true, it will be 'existance's' only chance for 'non-randomess' survuval!! end pt 2
MrZeta007 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have always been fans of Feynman and Hawking; and of course Einstein. The black hole theories are in the least very astounding. I myself study advanced physics, but havnt touched on black holes as I am more 'close to earth'. My new research involves the study of quantum electrodynamics, the inter-relatinships between waves and particles using wave theory to derive particle location in space and time, and finally, the study of randomness, chaos and complexity theory. end pt1
MrZeta007 2 years ago
Comment removed
MrZeta007 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
physics and all what scientists says about the univers is all stories, made up.
they dont know much.
they only think they know.
and theories are only stories.
no proof at all, I cant beleive/rely on this.
PVCLime 2 years ago
first of, you don't even get a 1% of it, retard.
vivid1234 2 years ago 3
Cool thing about physics is that it doesn't require your belief or your approval to be correct.
phys1c 2 years ago 2
haha. thats right =)
but the ciense about it. what people tell. thats what I dont belief. but I think you got that earlier ;)
PVCLime 2 years ago
I know of only a few that knows Overall Science better then me: I must confirm your statement.
Also theories that can't be tested at present have a problem: Withour concrete Sciencetific Evidence from Experiments, no theory can be confirmed, and must remain a story.
Science is suppose to look at evidence, and then test it. However in Astronomy and Plantology especailly, testing is out ot any reasonable question.
bcsviewer 2 years ago
Comment removed
svcollapse 2 years ago
Comment removed
svcollapse 2 years ago
And an other personal question. Can be there black holes in magnetism also like the gravity ones? Do magnetism affect the time space as gravity does? While electromagnetism is an other force of the nature. Can be at last a theoritically magnetic black hole?
hrbear 2 years ago
excellent question.
Until the end of physics (if one believes that there is an end), I believe that the human ability to pose questions is the reason why science has came so far. We should learn to appreciate problems and people who set them as those who solve them, because both are equally important.
soccom8341576 2 years ago
Comment removed
hrbear 2 years ago