Added: 4 years ago
From: A7XxFANxFORxLIFE
Views: 909,158
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (660)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The low nose is a huge giveaway that this car isn't what it claims to be.

  • they aren't acelerating!

  • yeah its a very very old F3000 car

  • F1???LOOOOOOOOOOOL

  • neither was designed for that kind of racing, but it's still very cool to watch :)

  • ...but as for terminal speed, F1 is slower than a truck...seriously.

    A jet truck, but still a truck... XD

  • Lam sao ma lampo an dc xe dua F1 Chu.Cai nay chắc biểu dien cho vui thoi Chu xe nao thang chua dua cung biết ket qua roi

  • best sounds ive heard from a f1!!

  • ke bosta

  • No launch control, and I think the driver of this Formula car didn´t run for 100%

  • @7urb0m4n He probably couldn't run it at 100%. He'd be spinning his rear tires from the start to the finish lol.

  • thats shocking what a let down

  • I think that this is not a standart F1 or it is/was haveing some problems

  • Beat the Diablo on 3 cylinders.

  • were do you find a drag race like this everytime i go to one i one see gay cars ????

  • if the people here are saying it was a bad start...and if they are talking about the f1..then u should all know that this is how f1 cars start off/sound like cause of the anti spin..and without the anti spin...good luck

  • arrows were mid-field cars.. and the drivers at that time were good drivers

  • i don't think he's F1 driver..

    and don't know why he short shifting it..

  • @8091yc hes playing with the lambo because if he gave it the beans then it would be all over to quickly

  • Yeahhh now after seeing this video iam going to race my pt cruiser against a f350 spyder yeyyyy may be i'd win

  • Good concept.

    But where's the excitement?

  • agaree on the wortest start, and aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadd worst drag everrrrrrr

  • oh shit ! I was sure the Lambo will win the race...

  • i mean that´s fucking obvious!

  • formula 1 driver is dumb he should,ve let lambhorghini go and then beat him

  • put it thisway- a formula car does 0-186 in i think 8.6 seconds. a bugatti veyron does 0-60 in like what? 2.5? but onbody has the balls to do that. so... and i mean, figures, that's 1200 hp. the diablo probably only has 700 and does 0-60 in like 3.7-4.0... of course if the formula driver put his foot down, would have won soooooo damn easily.. now, a mile drag would be different.

  • @machinegunboy98 Diablos only push like 500bhp unless its some special edition i didnt reaally get the point of your comment..?

  • @SpeedDemons420 my comment means if the lamborghini has any chance at all, it will beat the bugatti 0-60/62, because if it takes the bugatti 2.5 seconds to go 0-60, the formula is prolly already at 90. what my comment ment was it was a duh on who was going to win from the start. if the F-1 takes 8.6 seconds to do 0-186 and the bugatti probably takes 12, the only advantage the lamborghini would have to the bugatti is weight, but even then, formula = more engine +less weight... it was a "duh" vid.

  • that formula didn't even try hard, it was just playing with diablo, why don't you get it?

  • that was actually better than a typical f1 start you fucks

  • The start was always going to be appauling from the word go in the Arrows F1 case as there would not be enough heat in the tyres to grip the tarmac and would just keep the wheels spining - hence why he made a very careful start.

    Second of all F1 cars aren't made primarily made for fast starts, there built on a low torque (pulling power) and high power set-up.

  • @englandwc06 low torque? That car wasn't much more modernr than Michael's Benneton-Ford B194 which ran 2/3's of the Spanish GP in 5th gear, including pulling away from Pit stops in 5th. try doing that with low torque!

  • Jesus Christ I have made better starts with my ass

  • Wow that F3000 ride beat the pants off that WOPmobile.. :-0

  • Wow that F1 ride beat the pants off that WOPmobile.. :-0

  • lol phail... you will never see such an ugly f1 car :D

  • that's an F3000 where have u seen an F1 in this video?!??

  • That's an Arrow F3000 car, a Formula One car would have destroyed the Lambo.

  • NUL

  • Now let's do the same but with a Pagani Huyara, instead of the Lamborghini.

  • It's a F3000 car, the Arrows team has a F3000 team.

  • F1 was just trying to Toy around he wasnt really gunning it.

  • It's an Arrows F1 car, they were always crap and always had crap drivers.

  • @ForeverAyrtonSenna

    rthey always had crap drivers? sorry but Eddie Cheever, Derek Warwick, Heinz-Harald Frentzen, Riccardo Patrese, Thierry Boutsen, Alan Jones (who was world champion), Damon Hill (champion aswell) all drove for Arrows and they sure as hell werent crap, the cars were crap (except maybe in 1988) you should watch what your talking about...

  • @lordlingcp You forget Jos Verstappen! ;)

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @fabi027

    Jos the Boss!

  • @lordlingcp Love for Eddie, the most respectable Yank in F1 in the last 30 years!

    

  • @lordlingcp you forgot about the time damon came 2nd after having a stupendous lead only to have trouble on the final lap, the only reason for that was that the car wouldnt shift out of 2nd gear. he did well to rescue 2nd place.

  • @andrewjones1977 indeed he did. that race proved why he was champion in 96

  • @lordlingcp it sure does

  • @lordlingcp

    And --> Jack Tripper?

  • @GOUGOUNETTE who is jack tripper?

  • @ForeverAyrtonSenna You should do a bit of research and watch some old races, moron. And it's an F3000 car.

  • @blainyrules Sorry to burst your bubble but it IS an F1 car - it's a Footwork FA14 resprayed to look like the 2002 Arrows.

  • arrows f1 driver cant drive :o ?,

    never thought i'd say that but yes =l...

  • @ballisticeva01, no REALLY it's not. For one the driver head protection is missing and 2 the chassis is totally the wrong shape. It's a f3000 car. End of

  • the f1 car couldent get traction to half way down the track haha

  • Why dont they put TTG vs that fuckedup F1 car I bet my balls that TTG will blow away this crap

  • damn he had to feather the throttle until about 17seconds before going WOT

  • for those of you who think that was a horrible start for the f1 car should know u cant just mash the peddle in an f1 from standing start u would just spin the car thats why the Diablo got a slight lead.

  • dumbest race, of course the f 1 wins,, thats ONLY for race the lambo is for race AND normal car

  • @lilmessrappermocro really is it?!?!?! i dont think anyone knew that, thanks for clearing it up

  • That was miles too slow to be a F1 car. Nice try but the Diablo wouldn't have got ahead at the start if it was. Still I'd be surprised if anyone had any money on the Lambo.

  • He got of to stuttery start in F1 car!

  • That driver was terrible at shifting. I don't think it was an F1 driver

  • if this is formula1 i am an elephant

  • lamborghini tiene que aser un formula 1 para que le gane a la ferrari de alonso

  • i want to see the new veyron sports V a F1 car that will be the race of the year

  • It's not an F1 car.

  • Comment removed

  • I don t know much about F1,but i think the lamborghini had no chance.

  • The track is far too sticky for the F1 car which needs a little wheel spin to make it happen.

  • @casnick1

    lol exact opposite 

  • 0:14 someone has problems shifting

  • basically the f1 car .........well near f1 car as in chrisjones'' comment ha the whole thing in it cause f1 cars are fibre body that makes them as light as a leaf so what that f1 car is its a leaf with a 1000 horse power engine rolling on wheels plus the WHOLE thing is aerodynamic SO WTF WAS THAT LAMBO OWNER THINKING

  • who cares it still dusted the diablo

  • wat the hell is up with the shifting on the diablo

  • Why would u race a Formula car... No point as they slaughter most things Q_Q

  • @KGPDK there's a huge difference between drag race cars and race cars

  • @diego9191 As my post pointed out...... :)

  • i love f1 raceing but the lambo is a car you can use every day not the F1.

  • kkkkkkkkkk

  • I used to like lambos until they became popular with muzlim pimps

  • F1 cars arent built for drag racing. Sure their blazin fast and have amazing acceleration but its a essentially a time attack car. The reason he had a bad launch is because the tires werent holding traction, f1 cars arent shit unless their brakes and tires are hot. Those are race compound tires man lol. Cmon lol.

  • That was the worse start I have ever seen.

  • @bpbat21 first season watching F1 ?

  • @bpbat21 formula 1 is waaaaaaaaaay different to start off than any normal race car.

  • @krewkid09 and yet somehow they manage it 19 times a year in a race situation?? funny that. ok maybe 15-16 in 2002. But still!

  • @justin306 lol yes but they verse other formula 1 cars... not lambos.

  • a smart car can beat a lambo.

  • the only thing i would like to say ( and not necessary because everyone already knows ) is that there is no comparison in this "race". the car that seems to be an f1 weights at least 3 times less than that diablo... the engine? who cares.. take away 1000 kg from the diablo and you will have a more even race.

  • Why it's [ainted like that is simple.. Arrows had a junior team which ran F3000 as you claim it to be. And that is just what you see here. One other thing, A F1 car is not fast over 1/4 of a mile necause that is not what it is made for. It's made for going fast through cornors and no there are no cornors on a 1/4 mile straight. So if you have no idea whta you are talking about better dont be the wise guy.

  • @Sjakie1980 What are you talking about!? Depending on gear ratios and aero settings an F1 car can go 0 to 60mph in sub 2 seconds, how the hell is that not fast over a 1/4 mile!?

    Arrows were not running an F3000 team at the time of running THIS F1 paint scheme , so again your really quite wrong!

  • @chrisjones1980 what will a f3000 do in 0-60?

  • not F1

  • LOL. If this is F1, then im a Catholic priest

  • @duqeys nice... got a lot of bad things to confess.

  • he cant shift for shit and thats not the arrows F1

  • watch?v=rzJzAx3Yg9k

  • Not sure why people are arguing this is an F1 car, did you read my previous posts? This is an F3000 chassis running a Judd V10 running at around 8 to 10k rev range. It's been painted up with the arrows paint scheme, why I don't know.

  • Thats the slowest take off I've ever seen on a drag race.

    What makes it worse is that these are SUPPOSED to be highly RESPECTED cars because of their Speed

    I blame the drivers they weren't skilled

  • @TeK9KBC its not all that surprising, an F1 engine doesnt have much torque at all, about the same as a mid 90's V8 holden commodore, and given the cars arent exactly heavy they dont need the torque, by the time the aero loads kick in theyre already producing about 85% of theyre total power so thats no problem, the engines designs trade low end torque for high revs and high horsepower.

  • haha and you thin that a car can be faster than a formula! lol

  • Of course the Lamborghini is going to lose the other car is so low to the ground it get less wind resistance and is so light it would be able to beat a Lamborghini on the other hand the Lamborghini is so high up it gets more wind resistants and is so heavy that it will take longer to get up to the speed the other car is at by the time the other car hits 100 the Lamborghini will be at 60 cause its so heavy and so high off the ground.

  • @DeadlyKiller434 no dickhead 1 is a race car other a road car

  • @coljames1 Dude read that again cause you OBVIOUSLY did not understand that.

  • @DeadlyKiller434 The F1 car has a hell of a lot more wind resistance than the Lamborghini, even an elementary understanding of aerodynamics would show you that, its all to do with the design and shape of the car's bodywork, has bugger all to do with ride height.

  • @monaro632 Yeah the Formula is less wind resistant that the car will be just slicing through the air and the body work is thin so when it takes off it is able to take off at like 40 MPH and the lambo will take off at like 10 MPH. Don't agree to me or agree to me I don't care.

  • @DeadlyKiller434 didnt you read my reply? Formula 1 cars have a LOT more wind resistance (aerodynamic drag) than a road car not less!

  • aawhy there is no chat on you tube.. Btw anyone up for some cam chat^^

  • lol F1 doesnt have speed at first cuz its made for tracks

  • i see, i see.. well you learn something new every day

  • What a silly race - the Diablo is an awesome car but come on, I'd like to see it race, and don't laugh, and EVO. The fan boys say they are faster let's see it.

  • @592220 Once theyve spent a shitload of money on it, yes an EVO is faster.

  • @monaro632 What kind of drugs are you on? No evo on earth will ever be able to match the speed and handling of a F1 car.

  • @Duffblue read the comment numbnuts, talking about EVO vs. Lambo

  • @monaro632

    by evo, do you meen mitsubishi evo?

  • That f1 car looks like the f1 car Virgin GP

  • er schlägt sich noch gut!

  • no its not a formula 1 car.. but the driver is giving it everything the car has.. i mean you can hear him bouncing off the rev limiter a couple times..

  • Its the sound of traction control not rev limiter. It was the first time they use it in 2002 and is banned already sinse 2008

  • it is indeed an F1 car

  • This is not a real Formule 1 car. I guess it's a old F3000 car. You also can hear that he is not full accelerating. No way this is a V10 engine.

  • It is a F1 car. TWR Arrows. Driven by Jos Verstappen. V10 engine.

  • Comment removed

  • I bet that F1 car has a honda engine in it.

  • Judd V10 actually

  • The 2002 TWR Arrows had a Ford Cosworth V10 enginge.

  • when it was racing yes, this one is run in private ownership and is now fitted with a Judd V10, will be almost as fast but runs much much lower RPM's

  • O Ok, Do you know the owner or what? Sounds simulair to a Cosworth V10 with the TC searching for traction.

  • what did you expect

  • Just think if the F1 car was racing a BMW, the BMW fans would be making crap excuses why they lost the race.

  • en el arranque el lambo le gano, (se adelanto un poco.... pero bueno)  pero en la carrera el F1 lo desmadro ...sssss

  • f1 cars are a hell of alot faster then that

  • not these days..... engines capped, no turbos/superchargers, electronics etc...... f1 cars are getting more and more like go carts everyday.....

  • a superkart is not too dissimilar from an F1 car in grip and cornering forces generated, and thats from personal expierience

  • you can here the F1 in the begining taking it easy

  • @Rusty2540 as you can see he can't get much traction too

  • @Rusty2540 Yeah they are but he couldn't hook up until he was half way down the track.

  • @Rusty2540 try watching button vs a motorcykle vs a boat.

    Bike Vs Boat Vs Button .. and btw that is one hell of an old F1 car.

  • )))

  • IEven though the winner was ovious it was still good to see acceleration differance the Lambo's weight gave it the first few feet

  • @hypersaiyangoku the f1  started later if you look closer

  • Oh yeah I see, but I think the Lambo might have had little time level with the Arrows even if it is for 2-3 seconds

  • Thats not an F1 car, sounds more like F3000

  • 1 if you watch f1 back in 2002, you'd know this arrows car was in, and they were still V'10's

  • 1. That is NOT the Arrows A23 chassis ran in the 2002 FIA F1 world championship. Anyone with an ounce of F1 knowledge can see that is simply a donor car painted to resemble and Arrows F1 car.

    The easiest give away is the cockpit sides, theres no regulation angular head protection.

    2. That is NOT a rev limited V10 running, again ANYONE with the littlest knowledge for F1 can tell that engine isnt reving much above 9 to 10 thousand revs. In all probability its a Judd V8 as ran in the F3000 series.

  • Don't think I know nothing about F1, so I'm wrong, back then I didn't careless for the engines and that

  • So next time don't claim you do!

  • When I started watching the sport I was 11, so do you think I'd be interested,, and what's your problem so mistook I F1 car for a F3000 car, dosn't mean i know nothing of the sport

  • BRAVO

  • I heard this is the 1995 Footwork Hart painted like the 2002 Arrows.

  • this car could be and old f1

  • it says 2002 dumbass

  • really a 2002 f1 is quite old, it wudnt be any match for a 2010 f1 with the kinds of technology out there these days

  • @chrisjones1980 damn man u kno ur shit but i like le mans prototypes more

  • @chrisjones1980

    well the new F1 cars rev to 18,000 rpm.

  • @chrisjones1980 it doesnt even sound like its hitting 10,000 to be honest

  • @chrisjones1980 Agree with you. Probably an F3000... It might be or IT IS actually a minor series car!

  • @chrisjones1980 wow some one needs to open the blinds and get a life

  • @chrisjones1980 definatly a judd v8 cuz my friends mercedes and my m3 sounds like that

  • @chrisjones1980 Never mind the revs it makes the wrong sound all together.

  • @chrisjones1980

    Funny, there is an identical video posted "jtN_y3CMmiI" and the highest rating comment is the one who is bashing all the viewers who claim that it isn't an F1 car. There are way too many psuedo F1 fans who can't tell the difference between F1 and the F3000 Chasis. Not sure of about the engine but this clearly is an F3000 chasis.

  • @chrisjones1980

    This F1 is an 1995 Arrows.

  • thats like putting a kid on a skateboard race against a gsxr 600 bike....

  • what kind of race is that of course the formula is going to win

  • owned

  • f3000

  • the f1 is alot lighter than the lambo, it would be like sticking a lambo engine in a go cart , youll beat anything thats been hotrodded just because your ride comes in at 1400 lbs and thiers at least 3000 lbs

  • good sound jaj

  • All knows, F1 cars are fastest. But I like lambo.

  • dont u know that formula one cars have already ONE

  • Ups, i thought that it was the 2002 model. But now when you say it, I can see that this arrows car is older than the 2002 model. :D

  • That is a repainted Footwork Arrows FA16 from 1995 made to look like the 2002 Arrows. There was a regualtion change in 1997 to 1998 limiting the track to 180mm from 200mm.

    This has the lower sides around cockpit from 1995, as this was changed in 1996. Fact, not fiction or guessing! Besides this has low-nose front...

  • What do you mean with o rly.?

  • Super Aguri F1 Team used that Arrows car to build there first formula one car. the SA05 in 2006 :)

  • Lasted Arrows Car :(

  • F1 Cars hit 230 tops

  • F1 Car (Ferrari) did something like 385km/h few years ago (guess it was Barrichello).

    Also MotoGP does over 360km/h (Ducati)