if the people here are saying it was a bad start...and if they are talking about the f1..then u should all know that this is how f1 cars start off/sound like cause of the anti spin..and without the anti spin...good luck
put it thisway- a formula car does 0-186 in i think 8.6 seconds. a bugatti veyron does 0-60 in like what? 2.5? but onbody has the balls to do that. so... and i mean, figures, that's 1200 hp. the diablo probably only has 700 and does 0-60 in like 3.7-4.0... of course if the formula driver put his foot down, would have won soooooo damn easily.. now, a mile drag would be different.
@SpeedDemons420 my comment means if the lamborghini has any chance at all, it will beat the bugatti 0-60/62, because if it takes the bugatti 2.5 seconds to go 0-60, the formula is prolly already at 90. what my comment ment was it was a duh on who was going to win from the start. if the F-1 takes 8.6 seconds to do 0-186 and the bugatti probably takes 12, the only advantage the lamborghini would have to the bugatti is weight, but even then, formula = more engine +less weight... it was a "duh" vid.
The start was always going to be appauling from the word go in the Arrows F1 case as there would not be enough heat in the tyres to grip the tarmac and would just keep the wheels spining - hence why he made a very careful start.
Second of all F1 cars aren't made primarily made for fast starts, there built on a low torque (pulling power) and high power set-up.
@englandwc06 low torque? That car wasn't much more modernr than Michael's Benneton-Ford B194 which ran 2/3's of the Spanish GP in 5th gear, including pulling away from Pit stops in 5th. try doing that with low torque!
rthey always had crap drivers? sorry but Eddie Cheever, Derek Warwick, Heinz-Harald Frentzen, Riccardo Patrese, Thierry Boutsen, Alan Jones (who was world champion), Damon Hill (champion aswell) all drove for Arrows and they sure as hell werent crap, the cars were crap (except maybe in 1988) you should watch what your talking about...
@lordlingcp you forgot about the time damon came 2nd after having a stupendous lead only to have trouble on the final lap, the only reason for that was that the car wouldnt shift out of 2nd gear. he did well to rescue 2nd place.
@ballisticeva01, no REALLY it's not. For one the driver head protection is missing and 2 the chassis is totally the wrong shape. It's a f3000 car. End of
for those of you who think that was a horrible start for the f1 car should know u cant just mash the peddle in an f1 from standing start u would just spin the car thats why the Diablo got a slight lead.
That was miles too slow to be a F1 car. Nice try but the Diablo wouldn't have got ahead at the start if it was. Still I'd be surprised if anyone had any money on the Lambo.
basically the f1 car .........well near f1 car as in chrisjones'' comment ha the whole thing in it cause f1 cars are fibre body that makes them as light as a leaf so what that f1 car is its a leaf with a 1000 horse power engine rolling on wheels plus the WHOLE thing is aerodynamic SO WTF WAS THAT LAMBO OWNER THINKING
F1 cars arent built for drag racing. Sure their blazin fast and have amazing acceleration but its a essentially a time attack car. The reason he had a bad launch is because the tires werent holding traction, f1 cars arent shit unless their brakes and tires are hot. Those are race compound tires man lol. Cmon lol.
the only thing i would like to say ( and not necessary because everyone already knows ) is that there is no comparison in this "race". the car that seems to be an f1 weights at least 3 times less than that diablo... the engine? who cares.. take away 1000 kg from the diablo and you will have a more even race.
Why it's [ainted like that is simple.. Arrows had a junior team which ran F3000 as you claim it to be. And that is just what you see here. One other thing, A F1 car is not fast over 1/4 of a mile necause that is not what it is made for. It's made for going fast through cornors and no there are no cornors on a 1/4 mile straight. So if you have no idea whta you are talking about better dont be the wise guy.
@Sjakie1980 What are you talking about!? Depending on gear ratios and aero settings an F1 car can go 0 to 60mph in sub 2 seconds, how the hell is that not fast over a 1/4 mile!?
Arrows were not running an F3000 team at the time of running THIS F1 paint scheme , so again your really quite wrong!
Not sure why people are arguing this is an F1 car, did you read my previous posts? This is an F3000 chassis running a Judd V10 running at around 8 to 10k rev range. It's been painted up with the arrows paint scheme, why I don't know.
@TeK9KBC its not all that surprising, an F1 engine doesnt have much torque at all, about the same as a mid 90's V8 holden commodore, and given the cars arent exactly heavy they dont need the torque, by the time the aero loads kick in theyre already producing about 85% of theyre total power so thats no problem, the engines designs trade low end torque for high revs and high horsepower.
Of course the Lamborghini is going to lose the other car is so low to the ground it get less wind resistance and is so light it would be able to beat a Lamborghini on the other hand the Lamborghini is so high up it gets more wind resistants and is so heavy that it will take longer to get up to the speed the other car is at by the time the other car hits 100 the Lamborghini will be at 60 cause its so heavy and so high off the ground.
@DeadlyKiller434 The F1 car has a hell of a lot more wind resistance than the Lamborghini, even an elementary understanding of aerodynamics would show you that, its all to do with the design and shape of the car's bodywork, has bugger all to do with ride height.
@monaro632 Yeah the Formula is less wind resistant that the car will be just slicing through the air and the body work is thin so when it takes off it is able to take off at like 40 MPH and the lambo will take off at like 10 MPH. Don't agree to me or agree to me I don't care.
What a silly race - the Diablo is an awesome car but come on, I'd like to see it race, and don't laugh, and EVO. The fan boys say they are faster let's see it.
no its not a formula 1 car.. but the driver is giving it everything the car has.. i mean you can hear him bouncing off the rev limiter a couple times..
1. That is NOT the Arrows A23 chassis ran in the 2002 FIA F1 world championship. Anyone with an ounce of F1 knowledge can see that is simply a donor car painted to resemble and Arrows F1 car.
The easiest give away is the cockpit sides, theres no regulation angular head protection.
2. That is NOT a rev limited V10 running, again ANYONE with the littlest knowledge for F1 can tell that engine isnt reving much above 9 to 10 thousand revs. In all probability its a Judd V8 as ran in the F3000 series.
When I started watching the sport I was 11, so do you think I'd be interested,, and what's your problem so mistook I F1 car for a F3000 car, dosn't mean i know nothing of the sport
Funny, there is an identical video posted "jtN_y3CMmiI" and the highest rating comment is the one who is bashing all the viewers who claim that it isn't an F1 car. There are way too many psuedo F1 fans who can't tell the difference between F1 and the F3000 Chasis. Not sure of about the engine but this clearly is an F3000 chasis.
the f1 is alot lighter than the lambo, it would be like sticking a lambo engine in a go cart , youll beat anything thats been hotrodded just because your ride comes in at 1400 lbs and thiers at least 3000 lbs
That is a repainted Footwork Arrows FA16 from 1995 made to look like the 2002 Arrows. There was a regualtion change in 1997 to 1998 limiting the track to 180mm from 200mm.
This has the lower sides around cockpit from 1995, as this was changed in 1996. Fact, not fiction or guessing! Besides this has low-nose front...
The low nose is a huge giveaway that this car isn't what it claims to be.
sloanienz 3 days ago
they aren't acelerating!
Antonio88870 2 months ago
yeah its a very very old F3000 car
Luchingador 2 months ago
F1???LOOOOOOOOOOOL
mecastix2 2 months ago
neither was designed for that kind of racing, but it's still very cool to watch :)
syprix 3 months ago
...but as for terminal speed, F1 is slower than a truck...seriously.
A jet truck, but still a truck... XD
ATDOINFERNO 3 months ago
Lam sao ma lampo an dc xe dua F1 Chu.Cai nay chắc biểu dien cho vui thoi Chu xe nao thang chua dua cung biết ket qua roi
phantungoc 3 months ago
best sounds ive heard from a f1!!
Benfromlexave 3 months ago
ke bosta
morricev8 4 months ago
No launch control, and I think the driver of this Formula car didn´t run for 100%
7urb0m4n 5 months ago 15
@7urb0m4n He probably couldn't run it at 100%. He'd be spinning his rear tires from the start to the finish lol.
peepeevagi 2 months ago
thats shocking what a let down
shannon231291 5 months ago
I think that this is not a standart F1 or it is/was haveing some problems
crazyrocker321 5 months ago
Beat the Diablo on 3 cylinders.
e314ds 6 months ago
were do you find a drag race like this everytime i go to one i one see gay cars ????
brendantkianna 6 months ago
if the people here are saying it was a bad start...and if they are talking about the f1..then u should all know that this is how f1 cars start off/sound like cause of the anti spin..and without the anti spin...good luck
robiniroven 6 months ago
arrows were mid-field cars.. and the drivers at that time were good drivers
klepetar 6 months ago
i don't think he's F1 driver..
and don't know why he short shifting it..
8091yc 7 months ago
@8091yc hes playing with the lambo because if he gave it the beans then it would be all over to quickly
andrewjones1977 6 months ago
Yeahhh now after seeing this video iam going to race my pt cruiser against a f350 spyder yeyyyy may be i'd win
streetboy281 7 months ago
Good concept.
But where's the excitement?
analOG805 7 months ago
agaree on the wortest start, and aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaadd worst drag everrrrrrr
atomrocketcar 7 months ago
oh shit ! I was sure the Lambo will win the race...
gjhgjfd 8 months ago
i mean that´s fucking obvious!
TheCuboOne 9 months ago
formula 1 driver is dumb he should,ve let lambhorghini go and then beat him
NYMALIK25 9 months ago
put it thisway- a formula car does 0-186 in i think 8.6 seconds. a bugatti veyron does 0-60 in like what? 2.5? but onbody has the balls to do that. so... and i mean, figures, that's 1200 hp. the diablo probably only has 700 and does 0-60 in like 3.7-4.0... of course if the formula driver put his foot down, would have won soooooo damn easily.. now, a mile drag would be different.
machinegunboy98 9 months ago
@machinegunboy98 Diablos only push like 500bhp unless its some special edition i didnt reaally get the point of your comment..?
SpeedDemons420 8 months ago
@SpeedDemons420 my comment means if the lamborghini has any chance at all, it will beat the bugatti 0-60/62, because if it takes the bugatti 2.5 seconds to go 0-60, the formula is prolly already at 90. what my comment ment was it was a duh on who was going to win from the start. if the F-1 takes 8.6 seconds to do 0-186 and the bugatti probably takes 12, the only advantage the lamborghini would have to the bugatti is weight, but even then, formula = more engine +less weight... it was a "duh" vid.
machinegunboy98 8 months ago
that formula didn't even try hard, it was just playing with diablo, why don't you get it?
skylinerintegra 9 months ago 2
that was actually better than a typical f1 start you fucks
natesurfswell 9 months ago
The start was always going to be appauling from the word go in the Arrows F1 case as there would not be enough heat in the tyres to grip the tarmac and would just keep the wheels spining - hence why he made a very careful start.
Second of all F1 cars aren't made primarily made for fast starts, there built on a low torque (pulling power) and high power set-up.
englandwc06 9 months ago 2
@englandwc06 low torque? That car wasn't much more modernr than Michael's Benneton-Ford B194 which ran 2/3's of the Spanish GP in 5th gear, including pulling away from Pit stops in 5th. try doing that with low torque!
strange6 9 months ago
Jesus Christ I have made better starts with my ass
i8246i 9 months ago
Wow that F3000 ride beat the pants off that WOPmobile.. :-0
EvilPrince69 10 months ago
Wow that F1 ride beat the pants off that WOPmobile.. :-0
EvilPrince69 10 months ago
lol phail... you will never see such an ugly f1 car :D
zizikelizike 10 months ago
that's an F3000 where have u seen an F1 in this video?!??
JERRYRICE83 10 months ago
That's an Arrow F3000 car, a Formula One car would have destroyed the Lambo.
TheCarlsonsRaiders 10 months ago
NUL
valentin71100 10 months ago
Now let's do the same but with a Pagani Huyara, instead of the Lamborghini.
passingbynight 10 months ago
It's a F3000 car, the Arrows team has a F3000 team.
ricsi0531 11 months ago
F1 was just trying to Toy around he wasnt really gunning it.
totoybuang82 11 months ago 3
It's an Arrows F1 car, they were always crap and always had crap drivers.
ForeverAyrtonSenna 1 year ago
@ForeverAyrtonSenna
rthey always had crap drivers? sorry but Eddie Cheever, Derek Warwick, Heinz-Harald Frentzen, Riccardo Patrese, Thierry Boutsen, Alan Jones (who was world champion), Damon Hill (champion aswell) all drove for Arrows and they sure as hell werent crap, the cars were crap (except maybe in 1988) you should watch what your talking about...
lordlingcp 1 year ago 25
@lordlingcp You forget Jos Verstappen! ;)
fabi027 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
lordlingcp 1 year ago
Comment removed
lordlingcp 1 year ago
@fabi027
Jos the Boss!
sherman3211 1 year ago
@lordlingcp Love for Eddie, the most respectable Yank in F1 in the last 30 years!
dumbass45601 8 months ago
@lordlingcp you forgot about the time damon came 2nd after having a stupendous lead only to have trouble on the final lap, the only reason for that was that the car wouldnt shift out of 2nd gear. he did well to rescue 2nd place.
andrewjones1977 6 months ago
@andrewjones1977 indeed he did. that race proved why he was champion in 96
lordlingcp 6 months ago
@lordlingcp it sure does
andrewjones1977 6 months ago
@lordlingcp
And --> Jack Tripper?
GOUGOUNETTE 3 months ago
@GOUGOUNETTE who is jack tripper?
lordlingcp 3 months ago
@ForeverAyrtonSenna You should do a bit of research and watch some old races, moron. And it's an F3000 car.
blainyrules 4 months ago
@blainyrules Sorry to burst your bubble but it IS an F1 car - it's a Footwork FA14 resprayed to look like the 2002 Arrows.
AlexGRFan97 3 months ago
arrows f1 driver cant drive :o ?,
never thought i'd say that but yes =l...
WheresMySoul 1 year ago
@ballisticeva01, no REALLY it's not. For one the driver head protection is missing and 2 the chassis is totally the wrong shape. It's a f3000 car. End of
chrisjones1980 1 year ago
the f1 car couldent get traction to half way down the track haha
Xxslayer410xX 1 year ago
Why dont they put TTG vs that fuckedup F1 car I bet my balls that TTG will blow away this crap
doggysoftbg 1 year ago
damn he had to feather the throttle until about 17seconds before going WOT
zubydafa 1 year ago
for those of you who think that was a horrible start for the f1 car should know u cant just mash the peddle in an f1 from standing start u would just spin the car thats why the Diablo got a slight lead.
290reaper 1 year ago
dumbest race, of course the f 1 wins,, thats ONLY for race the lambo is for race AND normal car
lilmessrappermocro 1 year ago
@lilmessrappermocro really is it?!?!?! i dont think anyone knew that, thanks for clearing it up
ramboormark 1 year ago
That was miles too slow to be a F1 car. Nice try but the Diablo wouldn't have got ahead at the start if it was. Still I'd be surprised if anyone had any money on the Lambo.
kartkidchun 1 year ago
He got of to stuttery start in F1 car!
HitchHikersBlues 1 year ago
That driver was terrible at shifting. I don't think it was an F1 driver
millroyboy07 1 year ago
if this is formula1 i am an elephant
daflidis 1 year ago
lamborghini tiene que aser un formula 1 para que le gane a la ferrari de alonso
lokito6942 1 year ago
i want to see the new veyron sports V a F1 car that will be the race of the year
19may0001 1 year ago
It's not an F1 car.
Mr65Corvette 1 year ago
Comment removed
bgggbb 1 year ago
I don t know much about F1,but i think the lamborghini had no chance.
11panos04 1 year ago
The track is far too sticky for the F1 car which needs a little wheel spin to make it happen.
casnick1 1 year ago
@casnick1
lol exact opposite
tafka100 1 year ago
0:14 someone has problems shifting
diego9191 1 year ago
basically the f1 car .........well near f1 car as in chrisjones'' comment ha the whole thing in it cause f1 cars are fibre body that makes them as light as a leaf so what that f1 car is its a leaf with a 1000 horse power engine rolling on wheels plus the WHOLE thing is aerodynamic SO WTF WAS THAT LAMBO OWNER THINKING
bayyoomi 1 year ago
who cares it still dusted the diablo
34D2234 1 year ago
wat the hell is up with the shifting on the diablo
antonio6589 1 year ago
Why would u race a Formula car... No point as they slaughter most things Q_Q
KGPDK 1 year ago
@KGPDK there's a huge difference between drag race cars and race cars
diego9191 1 year ago
@diego9191 As my post pointed out...... :)
KGPDK 1 year ago
i love f1 raceing but the lambo is a car you can use every day not the F1.
OttonFilms 1 year ago
kkkkkkkkkk
jackmonza 1 year ago
I used to like lambos until they became popular with muzlim pimps
Cernukay 1 year ago
F1 cars arent built for drag racing. Sure their blazin fast and have amazing acceleration but its a essentially a time attack car. The reason he had a bad launch is because the tires werent holding traction, f1 cars arent shit unless their brakes and tires are hot. Those are race compound tires man lol. Cmon lol.
Nevermore707 1 year ago
That was the worse start I have ever seen.
bpbat21 1 year ago 98
@bpbat21 first season watching F1 ?
Bagjo123 1 year ago
@bpbat21 formula 1 is waaaaaaaaaay different to start off than any normal race car.
krewkid09 9 months ago 3
@krewkid09 and yet somehow they manage it 19 times a year in a race situation?? funny that. ok maybe 15-16 in 2002. But still!
justin306 8 months ago
@justin306 lol yes but they verse other formula 1 cars... not lambos.
krewkid09 8 months ago
a smart car can beat a lambo.
FatalBlueFlame 1 year ago
the only thing i would like to say ( and not necessary because everyone already knows ) is that there is no comparison in this "race". the car that seems to be an f1 weights at least 3 times less than that diablo... the engine? who cares.. take away 1000 kg from the diablo and you will have a more even race.
Adrianish84 1 year ago
Why it's [ainted like that is simple.. Arrows had a junior team which ran F3000 as you claim it to be. And that is just what you see here. One other thing, A F1 car is not fast over 1/4 of a mile necause that is not what it is made for. It's made for going fast through cornors and no there are no cornors on a 1/4 mile straight. So if you have no idea whta you are talking about better dont be the wise guy.
Sjakie1980 1 year ago
@Sjakie1980 What are you talking about!? Depending on gear ratios and aero settings an F1 car can go 0 to 60mph in sub 2 seconds, how the hell is that not fast over a 1/4 mile!?
Arrows were not running an F3000 team at the time of running THIS F1 paint scheme , so again your really quite wrong!
chrisjones1980 1 year ago
@chrisjones1980 what will a f3000 do in 0-60?
xismxist 1 year ago
not F1
jerrydrx 1 year ago
LOL. If this is F1, then im a Catholic priest
duqeys 1 year ago
@duqeys nice... got a lot of bad things to confess.
mhatthei 1 year ago
he cant shift for shit and thats not the arrows F1
dpstarcom 1 year ago
watch?v=rzJzAx3Yg9k
Freerap99 1 year ago
Not sure why people are arguing this is an F1 car, did you read my previous posts? This is an F3000 chassis running a Judd V10 running at around 8 to 10k rev range. It's been painted up with the arrows paint scheme, why I don't know.
chrisjones1980 1 year ago
Thats the slowest take off I've ever seen on a drag race.
What makes it worse is that these are SUPPOSED to be highly RESPECTED cars because of their Speed
I blame the drivers they weren't skilled
TeK9KBC 1 year ago
@TeK9KBC its not all that surprising, an F1 engine doesnt have much torque at all, about the same as a mid 90's V8 holden commodore, and given the cars arent exactly heavy they dont need the torque, by the time the aero loads kick in theyre already producing about 85% of theyre total power so thats no problem, the engines designs trade low end torque for high revs and high horsepower.
monaro632 1 year ago
haha and you thin that a car can be faster than a formula! lol
551ferari 1 year ago
Of course the Lamborghini is going to lose the other car is so low to the ground it get less wind resistance and is so light it would be able to beat a Lamborghini on the other hand the Lamborghini is so high up it gets more wind resistants and is so heavy that it will take longer to get up to the speed the other car is at by the time the other car hits 100 the Lamborghini will be at 60 cause its so heavy and so high off the ground.
DeadlyKiller434 1 year ago
@DeadlyKiller434 no dickhead 1 is a race car other a road car
coljames1 1 year ago
@coljames1 Dude read that again cause you OBVIOUSLY did not understand that.
DeadlyKiller434 1 year ago
@DeadlyKiller434 The F1 car has a hell of a lot more wind resistance than the Lamborghini, even an elementary understanding of aerodynamics would show you that, its all to do with the design and shape of the car's bodywork, has bugger all to do with ride height.
monaro632 1 year ago
@monaro632 Yeah the Formula is less wind resistant that the car will be just slicing through the air and the body work is thin so when it takes off it is able to take off at like 40 MPH and the lambo will take off at like 10 MPH. Don't agree to me or agree to me I don't care.
DeadlyKiller434 1 year ago
@DeadlyKiller434 didnt you read my reply? Formula 1 cars have a LOT more wind resistance (aerodynamic drag) than a road car not less!
monaro632 1 year ago
aawhy there is no chat on you tube.. Btw anyone up for some cam chat^^
KeneaHerbst67 1 year ago
lol F1 doesnt have speed at first cuz its made for tracks
Soulspan 1 year ago
i see, i see.. well you learn something new every day
cellmate454 1 year ago
What a silly race - the Diablo is an awesome car but come on, I'd like to see it race, and don't laugh, and EVO. The fan boys say they are faster let's see it.
592220 1 year ago
@592220 Once theyve spent a shitload of money on it, yes an EVO is faster.
monaro632 1 year ago
@monaro632 What kind of drugs are you on? No evo on earth will ever be able to match the speed and handling of a F1 car.
Duffblue 1 year ago
@Duffblue read the comment numbnuts, talking about EVO vs. Lambo
monaro632 1 year ago
@monaro632
by evo, do you meen mitsubishi evo?
02norcottg 1 year ago
That f1 car looks like the f1 car Virgin GP
Sekhurity 1 year ago
er schlägt sich noch gut!
MrFriscoJoe 1 year ago
no its not a formula 1 car.. but the driver is giving it everything the car has.. i mean you can hear him bouncing off the rev limiter a couple times..
cellmate454 1 year ago
Its the sound of traction control not rev limiter. It was the first time they use it in 2002 and is banned already sinse 2008
Maastricht1 1 year ago
it is indeed an F1 car
monaro632 1 year ago
This is not a real Formule 1 car. I guess it's a old F3000 car. You also can hear that he is not full accelerating. No way this is a V10 engine.
negativoost 1 year ago
It is a F1 car. TWR Arrows. Driven by Jos Verstappen. V10 engine.
Maastricht1 1 year ago
Comment removed
Maastricht1 1 year ago
I bet that F1 car has a honda engine in it.
300ZXrider1 1 year ago
Judd V10 actually
monaro632 1 year ago
The 2002 TWR Arrows had a Ford Cosworth V10 enginge.
Maastricht1 1 year ago
when it was racing yes, this one is run in private ownership and is now fitted with a Judd V10, will be almost as fast but runs much much lower RPM's
monaro632 1 year ago
O Ok, Do you know the owner or what? Sounds simulair to a Cosworth V10 with the TC searching for traction.
Maastricht1 1 year ago
what did you expect
em2skunk2 1 year ago
Just think if the F1 car was racing a BMW, the BMW fans would be making crap excuses why they lost the race.
fresky74 1 year ago
en el arranque el lambo le gano, (se adelanto un poco.... pero bueno) pero en la carrera el F1 lo desmadro ...sssss
HECTORX823 2 years ago
f1 cars are a hell of alot faster then that
Rusty2540 2 years ago 33
not these days..... engines capped, no turbos/superchargers, electronics etc...... f1 cars are getting more and more like go carts everyday.....
8Julius8 1 year ago
a superkart is not too dissimilar from an F1 car in grip and cornering forces generated, and thats from personal expierience
monaro632 1 year ago
you can here the F1 in the begining taking it easy
mcttrade 1 year ago
@Rusty2540 as you can see he can't get much traction too
PTFuZi 1 year ago
@Rusty2540 Yeah they are but he couldn't hook up until he was half way down the track.
bgggbb 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Rusty2540 haha dude it dident get traction till half way down the track
Xxslayer410xX 1 year ago
@Rusty2540 try watching button vs a motorcykle vs a boat.
Bike Vs Boat Vs Button .. and btw that is one hell of an old F1 car.
Bagjo123 1 year ago
)))
emikua 2 years ago
IEven though the winner was ovious it was still good to see acceleration differance the Lambo's weight gave it the first few feet
hypersaiyangoku 2 years ago
@hypersaiyangoku the f1 started later if you look closer
jaydee00003 2 years ago
Oh yeah I see, but I think the Lambo might have had little time level with the Arrows even if it is for 2-3 seconds
hypersaiyangoku 2 years ago
Thats not an F1 car, sounds more like F3000
chrisjones1980 2 years ago
1 if you watch f1 back in 2002, you'd know this arrows car was in, and they were still V'10's
hypersaiyangoku 2 years ago
1. That is NOT the Arrows A23 chassis ran in the 2002 FIA F1 world championship. Anyone with an ounce of F1 knowledge can see that is simply a donor car painted to resemble and Arrows F1 car.
The easiest give away is the cockpit sides, theres no regulation angular head protection.
2. That is NOT a rev limited V10 running, again ANYONE with the littlest knowledge for F1 can tell that engine isnt reving much above 9 to 10 thousand revs. In all probability its a Judd V8 as ran in the F3000 series.
chrisjones1980 2 years ago 71
Don't think I know nothing about F1, so I'm wrong, back then I didn't careless for the engines and that
hypersaiyangoku 2 years ago
So next time don't claim you do!
chrisjones1980 2 years ago
When I started watching the sport I was 11, so do you think I'd be interested,, and what's your problem so mistook I F1 car for a F3000 car, dosn't mean i know nothing of the sport
hypersaiyangoku 2 years ago
BRAVO
BRKmaddox 2 years ago
I heard this is the 1995 Footwork Hart painted like the 2002 Arrows.
Nocito87 2 years ago
this car could be and old f1
alonso932 2 years ago
it says 2002 dumbass
mcttrade 1 year ago
really a 2002 f1 is quite old, it wudnt be any match for a 2010 f1 with the kinds of technology out there these days
blakbounty 1 year ago
@chrisjones1980 damn man u kno ur shit but i like le mans prototypes more
redfoxtrident 1 year ago
@chrisjones1980
well the new F1 cars rev to 18,000 rpm.
bioreactive 1 year ago
@chrisjones1980 it doesnt even sound like its hitting 10,000 to be honest
paulio2293 1 year ago
@chrisjones1980 Agree with you. Probably an F3000... It might be or IT IS actually a minor series car!
Vecio88C 1 year ago
@chrisjones1980 wow some one needs to open the blinds and get a life
NICKSmyNAMEbitch 1 year ago
@chrisjones1980 definatly a judd v8 cuz my friends mercedes and my m3 sounds like that
DirgeHQ 1 year ago
@chrisjones1980 Never mind the revs it makes the wrong sound all together.
kartkidchun 1 year ago
@chrisjones1980
Funny, there is an identical video posted "jtN_y3CMmiI" and the highest rating comment is the one who is bashing all the viewers who claim that it isn't an F1 car. There are way too many psuedo F1 fans who can't tell the difference between F1 and the F3000 Chasis. Not sure of about the engine but this clearly is an F3000 chasis.
robertoppenheimer 1 year ago
@chrisjones1980
This F1 is an 1995 Arrows.
BallisticEVA01 1 year ago
thats like putting a kid on a skateboard race against a gsxr 600 bike....
iiIiIIbeaZIIiIii 2 years ago
what kind of race is that of course the formula is going to win
catchitudrema 2 years ago
owned
fuckyouitsminebiatch 2 years ago
f3000
xismxist 2 years ago
the f1 is alot lighter than the lambo, it would be like sticking a lambo engine in a go cart , youll beat anything thats been hotrodded just because your ride comes in at 1400 lbs and thiers at least 3000 lbs
tabese1000 2 years ago
good sound jaj
pijorra 2 years ago
All knows, F1 cars are fastest. But I like lambo.
mahidmalik7 2 years ago 4
dont u know that formula one cars have already ONE
FlashDusk 2 years ago 3
Ups, i thought that it was the 2002 model. But now when you say it, I can see that this arrows car is older than the 2002 model. :D
NHRcing 2 years ago
That is a repainted Footwork Arrows FA16 from 1995 made to look like the 2002 Arrows. There was a regualtion change in 1997 to 1998 limiting the track to 180mm from 200mm.
This has the lower sides around cockpit from 1995, as this was changed in 1996. Fact, not fiction or guessing! Besides this has low-nose front...
Lykkis 2 years ago 5
What do you mean with o rly.?
NHRcing 2 years ago
Super Aguri F1 Team used that Arrows car to build there first formula one car. the SA05 in 2006 :)
NHRcing 2 years ago
Lasted Arrows Car :(
pawel1818 2 years ago 3
F1 Cars hit 230 tops
marcrockett 2 years ago
F1 Car (Ferrari) did something like 385km/h few years ago (guess it was Barrichello).
Also MotoGP does over 360km/h (Ducati)
Tearnofear 2 years ago