lol this is legal i've shot them and they, for a 12ga round, surprisingly have really no kick just goes to show that people never check gun laws any more ALL GUNS ARE LEGAL AND AMMO in most states
1.Open crimp at front of shell. 2.Remove all shot and wadding leaving just propellant in shell. 3. Fill shell with black powder or pyrodex. 4. Pack powder down and recrimp shell.5. Load into old single shot gun and pull trigger.6. enjoy the blast.
Dragon's Breath Rounds are only illegal in 4-6 states and NOT illegal in mine. So why title this as "ILLEGAL..12 Gauge (flame-throwers) Dragons Breath Rounds"?
And I ain't trying to sound all trigger happy like omega either that's the 1 percent of gun owners but gun rights are here to stay get over it maybe you should try picking a gun up and shooting it you don't have to kill anything you can shoot cans and such
@420x24x7 He's a liberal anti-gun Asshat what do you expect? They only know what they are indoctrinated to know and to them "Guns are bad mmmkay because because guns are mmbad.". They have no concrete evidence to base their stupidity and ignorance on other than their own asinine propaganda they pick up from people that wish to be defenseless sheep.
ya'll are so fuckin immature, who da fuck cares, and ya'll gotta bring racism to the table dont you, makes you feel big huh? ya'll are a disgrace to the human nature. idiots
@WolleytheMonster no I'm not a retard, and in one of the levels you use dragon breath rounds, I was implying that black ops influences the views of this video. Your the fucking retard.
@999WANA yeah the advertiseing really got a lot of people excited for it till they actually played the game for a little bit and realised it wasnt what they had said
It's a damn shame people start pointless arguments over a video of a guy shooting a shotgun. Seriously, winning an argument over the internet won't get you anything.
Authorised hmmm equal protection of the law in my opinion means if someone else law abiding as I am is allowed to own something so shall I under my constitutional protection to have the same liberties as my fellow americans. If someone else can own a machine and we are all created equal the laws must apply to me the same as anyone else hmm seems kinda double standard here in the land of the so called free. Hmm Liberty what does it mean to you? )o,,,
@MRAXWEDBAF What are you talking about, the package the shells are in? That's exactly what it looks like, though there are a couple companies that load these.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Honestly, there is no reason to regulate something like this, it has a range of 25 yards and is only good for starting fires....
You can burn the fuck out of houses and fuck people up eight ways till Saturday if you hit them, and even if what you say is true there's simply no reason to give the unwashed masses access to that kind of thing. It's just asking for fucking trouble.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey You can the burn the fuck out of houses and fuck people up with gasoline too so by your rationale we should ban it and all walk.
No, you shouldn't. Because Gasoline isn't flat-out obviously weapon, and actually has any use other than burning things. This does not, and is by definition a weapon. It has no use in casual society; it can't be concealed for self defence and even if it could there's no reason to use Dragon Breath rounds. It can literally only be used for starting fires and showing off to your friends, which will itself inevitably lead to fires. You fail at logic.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Why does something have to be obviously a weapon to be used as one? The answer of course is that it doesn't. Why does something have to be "concealed for self defence"? The answer is that it doesn't. The primary purpose of these rounds is recreation, like fireworks, sports cars, air guns, paint ball guns and a thousand other potentially dangerous things we would ban with your absurd rationale. What about magnesium? Gonna ban that? So much for your attempt at logic.
Nah, you're the one failing at logic. The first clue is that you're trying to argue that a shotgun that shoots fucking fire isn't dangerous and has every reason to be legal. Might wanna re-assess your priorities there, bucko.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey "Nah, you're the one failing at logic. " LOL which is why you failed to address any of the points made. "The first clue is that you're trying to argue that a shotgun that shoots fucking fire isn't dangerous" As opposed to a shotgun that shoots lead projectiles? No not especially dangerous. As opposed to a Corvette that will hit 180, no again not especially dangerous. Name one person ever killed by one of these rounds...I'm waiting.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey You are the unwashed masses you stupid shit. In your case though I gotta admit you would probably kill yourself with a book of fucking matches but you still have the right to have em.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Not for you. A moron like you could choke with your own fucking shoelace. We should ban those right away to keep your stupid ass alive. Next we can ban fucking flare guns that shoot fire and goddamn road flares that burn, you fucktard.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey No it isn't. It's made to keep people like you who hate and fear freedom and long for a nanny state at bay. It works quite well for that as evidenced by your whining here.
Really? How's that economy working out for ya? And that gun crime? How's that militia (which is supposed to be the only reason gun ownership exists) coming along?
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey The economy, which has nothing to do with this and is just your feeble attempt to distract from the argument you're losing is not effecting me at all. Violent crime, including gun crime is at near record lows and crime with these rounds, which are the only thing at issue here, is, as far as I can tell, non-existent. The supreme has already affirmed the 2nd amendment to guarantee an individual right and the militia is still codeified under US law.
Whatever the fuck you say, big guy. The final fact of the matter is that these have zero reason to be legal, the only reason they are legal is to prepare for a militia that you're never ever gonna actually need, and they have zero practical application other than amusing idiots. Kind of a retarded law system you have there.
Oh, and that arrogant little above-it-all act you just tried to pull? Works better if you spelled the word "affecting" right.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey "Whatever the fuck you say, big guy. " LMAO Now that you've lost every point you're getting upset. Poor baby. In a FREE COUNTRY citizens don't have to justify the need for something, the government has to justify the need to restrict it. I'm still waiting for you to point me to a case where someone has been killed with one of these or even where one has been used unlawfully. You've utterly failed of course.
It also works better if you don't try to actually pull it, seeing as someone who genuinely isn't being affected wouldn't need to draw attention to it.
It helps if you read all my comments instead of just focusing on the shortest one. I appreciate you might have problems with long sentences, but bear with me here.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey I have read all your absurd childish comments and have refuted everything you said. At which point you two step off onto something else to distract from the points you already lost. You went from these shotgun rounds, to the fucking economy (LMAO at that one) to guns in general now your whining because I pointed out that your babbling based on the fact that you wrote "It also works better if you don't try to actually pull it..." which is babbling nonsense.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Yes given that armed force is the only way to enforce individual rights against a government that no longer respects civil liberties gun ownership is an important right of any people who wish to remain free. Ghaddafi wasn't just overthrown with spitballs. On the upside most dictators from Hitler to Stalin to Amin would agree with you that citizens should not be armed, so you do have that.......but not much else.
Yeah, I somehow doubt your government is in much need of overthrowing. Try not to confuse "my own freedom to own this here shootin'-iron, hyuck" with "freedom of speech and actual important freedoms". You'd be amazed how many people make that mistake as well.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey European Jews didn't think Hitler was a problem either until, of course after they were disarmed and on their way to the gas chambers and it was too late. Fools like you though never learn from history. You can't manage to figure out that governments have killed millions more in the last century than individuals have in the entire time man has been on the planet. I'm still waiting for you to show me where one of these rounds has been used criminally.
Ah, so you're comparing Obama to Hitler now. You do realize that you just did a better job of invalidating your own argument than I ever could, right?
Oh, and the criminal use? I never fucking mentioned it in relation to these things. My entire fucking point, if you hadn't been too busy thinking up counterarguments to read it, was that these has *no* use whatsoever other than showing off and inevitably accidentally starting fires. There's no point in having them legal.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey No I never compared Obama to Hitler. I made the point that an unarmed population is at risk of tyranny and genocide and that people who give up their rights can't predict the future. These concepts are far too difficult for you to wrap your mind around so you start babbling about Obama. I'm still waiting for you to point out an instance of criminal misuse in support of your assertion that they need to be banned and you're still failing miserably.
"I'm still waiting for you to point out an instance of criminal misuse in support of your assertion that they need to be banned and you're still failing miserably."
Are you even capable of reading? I've stated my main point several times, I won't do it again.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey ""I'm still waiting for you to point out an instance of criminal misuse in support of your assertion that they need to be banned and you're still failing miserably."
Are you even capable of reading? I've stated my main point several times, I won't do it again."
You don't have a point. You've pretty much conceded they aren't misused. Basically, the scarry pyrotechnics frighten you and you want to inconvenience everyone for your insipid paranoia.
Lol, no. You're failing at this whole reading thing again. My point is that they have no sensible reason to be legal, non whatsoever, and the only reason they are is because idiots like you start piping up about civil liberties at the merest mention of a change to gun laws. As for paranoia, really? I wasn't the one trying to use Hitler as a reason to be allowed to have a ridiculous and useless fire-shotgun.
Lax gun laws are an oversight, not a god-given privilege.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey So called "lax gun laws are a constitutional right. Period. You are scared (because you're a coward) of a simple pyrotechnic device. You are too stupid to realize that anybody who buys something made of magnesium can simply file it, load the filings into a shotshell along with some powder and a shotcup and get essentially the same effect. So now are you going to ban Magnesium because you are afraid what it can be used for?
Nope, because magnesium can be used for other things. As I've stated many times before, those shells have literally no other application. However. Your childish default to accusing me of being scared and the fact that you honestly seem to think you'd stand any chance against a totalitarian dictator with what you can buy a gun store leads to to believe I'm arguing with either a minor or a particularly stupid Republican.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey You have no reason to ban this other than you want to. Period. Small arms have been used successfully against superpowers to include the US and Russia in 4 wars in the past 50 years. Since you obviously think technological superiority guarantees military victory you must think the US won Vietnam and the Russians still control Afghanistan. That makes you too stupid for me to continue to converse with. Have a nice day and please please stay in whatever country you are in.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Well of course I won. You couldn't win an argument with yourself. You went from stating the need to ban a recreational device............why again.........oh that's right no reason at all, to babbling about the economy which has nothing to do with anything, when that distraction didn't work you started babling about guns in general. All because your reason to ban something comes down to 'Well uhh uhhh uhhh duhhh [scratch head, drool] I just don't see why people need it".
Oh hay, turns out you can read. Just not very well. Look at it like this. Can you think of one good reason (and for the record, some bullshit about civil liberties and recreational devices is not a good reason) that the shotgun that shoots fire should actually be fucking legal?
Oh, and falling back once again on internet slang and pretending I'm stupid isn't valid either. I know it works on the other kids in middle school, but things are a little different here.
As such, I'm going to stop now because it's abundantly clear neither one of us is ever going to back down or stop trying to pick retarded holes in the other's arguments and this is more or less like trying to talk to a brick fucking wall. A brick wall with a boner for firearms.
I'm going now. You can choose to believe this means you've won, if you'd like. Have fun with your delusions and apparent illiteracy, Steve.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey You stupid fucker there is no reason for them to be illegal and the reason for them to be legal is because people have fun using them. Businesses also make money producing and selling them. The people using them are happy to pay the businesses making and selling them and the people working for the businesses are happy to have the money to pay their bills. The only people who aren't happy are whiny little pussy fags like you who worry about what everybody else is doing.
Oh, and for the record the pyrotechnics are frankly fucking awesome. Why would I be watching a youtube video about it in the first place if I was scared of the damn thing? Moreover, why the fuck would I be scared of the thing when I don't even live in the same country as it?
You really gotta learn to think these things through. Steve.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey LMAO so you want to ban something that you can't find any history of misuse of and that can't possibly affect you.............why again? Just because?? You've lost your whole argument yet again. LMFAO some more. Bye.
"Yeah, I somehow doubt your government is in much need of overthrowing."
"European Jews didn't think Hitler was a problem either until, of course after they were disarmed and on their way to the gas chambers and it was too late."
Seeing as your current government is the Obama administration, and you brought up Hitler in direct response to your current government being mentioned...
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey The comparison to Obama is yours and your alone. I never compared the current administration to Hitler or anything else. I never said a threat came from the current administration. I simply pointed out that unarmed populations are vulnerable to genocide. You then made multiple baseless assumptions which you are trying to use to prop up your pathetic argument. Again your 'logic' falls apart. What are you about 13?
Nope. Seeing as most of your arguments thus far have been based on not actually bothering to read what's been put down and then denying doing things you obviously just fucking did, you're in no position to make accusations of logic.
Still, at least this is a big entertaining flame war for everyone.
Additional point, although with your current show of stubborn-ness quite obviously not going to be final. If the American government was *really* planning a takeover, do you honestly think they'd let you keep your fancy little guns? Do you honestly think that you'd be able to hold out against them with your civilian bullshit? Because if so, you might wanna think again.
Oh, and try not to bring up Ghaddafi this time. It's a totally different case to what you're proposing.
"If the American government was *really* planning a takeover, do you honestly think they'd let you keep your fancy little guns? Do you honestly think that you'd be able to hold out against them with your civilian bullshit?" LMAO The American government doesn't have to take over, it's in control now BWAHAHAHA do you even read this stupidity before you post it?
Ah, typed laughter. The true sign of a level mind. I also like the way you used said laughter to avoid having to address the actual point there. You knew damn well what the fuck I meant. Cute, that.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey "Do you honestly think that you'd be able to hold out against them with your civilian bullshit? Because if so, you might wanna think again."
Based on this idiotic rationale the US won in Vietnam, the Russians won in Afghanistan, and we have pacified Iraq and Afghanistan since you seem to believe that technological superiority guarantees military victory. Probably the stupidist assumption you've made yet. Oh yeah, and Gaddafi is still in power. LMAO
The Viet Cong won with military ware. The Taliban are using military ware. Three guesses what Ghaddafi was taken down with. Hate to break it to ya, Steve, but your shitty little civilian .223 single shot really isn't going to be able to stand up to what the government are gonna be able to role out.
Notice how I said "Civilian". Important word there. Reading isn't your strong suite, is it?
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Hey, dumfuck, most casualties in all those wars were inflicted with small arms, and IED's that can be easily made from AN fertilizer. Small arms are used by irregular forces to secure more powerful weapons. Conventional armies almost always lose to irregular forces because they can't effectively target them and when they try they kill civillians, the relatives of whom then turn against them. The US and the Russians have learned it when the fuck will you?
So? IEDs have nothing to do with gun laws. I'm merely stating that what you can buy at the average gun store really isn't going to be much help against what the US army can roll out. Note that most of the militias that you listed were using military grade supplies and weapons, not the nerfed shit available for civilian use in the US.
You have the same problem as Steve, in that you seem to be unable to decide what you're actually arguing.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Poor little fucktard you dont know what you are talking about. The small arms available in US gun stores are the same as the small arms used around the world except for the lack of full fucking auto which is usually not needed and they can be converted in no time if it was. Also fucktard go google tannerite which is sold on the internet and in gun stores all over America, If you think this should be banned your fucktard ass will piss your pants when you see that.
@youbetterbelievehah Christ your such a fuckwitt who couldn't argue your way out of a paperbag. Whoever did your lobotomy needs to give you a refund. They took out to fucking much.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Last I checked, you stupid fuck, Ghaddafi was taken down with a bullet in the head. Yeah dumbass that's a bullet. Who the fuck has a .223 SINGLE SHOT? My beta C's for my AR-15's hold 100 rounds EACH you dumb shit. .223 ain't gonna stand up huh? Guess that's why every fucking NATO country issues a rifle in 5.56/.223 to their soldiers, you stupid fucktard. Tell the Dr that did your lobotomy he cut out too much and you want your fucking $ back.
@Superlagg You have ADD in addition to being a fucktard huh? Congratulations youve lost every single point you tried to make and are too stupid to even remember what they were.
One: .223 =/= .5.57 in anything except basic size. You have a shitty little civilian variant. If it's regulated to something other than semi-auto, it is illegal. Therefore, against the shit that the US army could roll out (and that's what he was actually arguing here, Ghaddafi was taken down with military ware purchased from the black market and is a completely different proposition) it'd be fucking useless. Again, might wanna check what was actually being argued.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Hey dumb fuck the US military dumped FA on the M4 way back because it's NOT NEEDED. Semi auto fire is more accurate and conserves ammo. Not that youre dumb ass would know that. You stupid fuck you think civillian US weapons are single shot. Where the fuck do you even buy a single shot .223????? Most of the shit the US military can roll out is USELESS in urban areas because of collateral damage not that your dumb ass knows what that is either. Stupid shit.
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey And dumbshit it's 5.56 not 5.57 you moron and you couldnt tell 5.56 from .223 if they were side by side and you had a fucking magnifying glass.They are almost identical. Also FA weapons including machine guns are not illegal in the US. They are just tax stamped. On top of that SA can be converted to FA by almost anyone if needed even though it really isn't. Not you though youre probably too fucking stupid to tie your own shoes without help.
@omegapoint777 People like you are the reason why guns should be banned, violent assholes thinking that the ability to murder people equals freedom. Who are you to say what freedom is, and who should have it? Why is having the ability to murder those who dont agree with you the only gauge of freedom? I thought freedom was the ability to live a life unmolested by psychopaths, not wave around implements of war and murder to pretend they are a real person.
You aren't going to ban guns here. End of debate. You have no right to go around and tell people what they may own. I have the freedom to own firearms and you aren't going to stop me, nor will any government.
@Superlagg "I thought freedom was the ability to live a life unmolested by psychopaths, "
Gee I wonder who a "psychopath" would rather "molest" one of you little pacifists with no weapons or me with a .45 auto and a bunch of those scary 'assault weapons'. Personally if I was the psychopath I would consider you fresh meat and me a potentially dangerous individual best left the fuck alone. Psychopaths are not stupid. People who refuse to be armed for their own defense are.
@Superlagg Don't listen to omegapoint777 he is just a little internet tough guy troll. He isn't actually capable of anything. Just another scrawny little white kid with big ears that get red when he's mad and pretends to play a white racist for attention. hahaha
@Superlagg Last time I checked, you can't change anything on the Bill of Rights. Guns are the main reason why the United States of America is a country. If you're about to be mugged by some low life welfare recipient or you're protecting your family from being raped and then killed, which is faster? Pulling a gun and killing that sorry bastard, or calling the police, the criminal seeing this happen, kills you with whatever weapon he chooses. I think you may want to rethink your argument.
@OkAyAtGaMiN if youre getting mugged, pulling a gun will just get you and whoever's dumb enough to be around you killed. All guns are is just a power fantasy, they make you feel like you're less of a retarded hick with no future. You dont need to kill people at the drop of a hat, the constitution doesnt say anywhere that you have the right to be a psychopath that's fully willing and able to murder someone he doesnt agree with. Just because its legal doesnt meen its not a bad idea.
You are an incredibly idiot to believe what you believe. I have a Handgun Carry Permit and I find it offensive to see people as ignorant as you...fucking GD liberal gun control advocates WHINING about the our RIGHT TO BARE ARMS. THe FACTS are that people carrying their own firearms REDUCES crime especially when they carry openly and when you ban them you ban them for LEGAL carriers.
You get back to me now when you're beaten and raped in your arse by a group of thugs because you weren't armed.
lol this is legal i've shot them and they, for a 12ga round, surprisingly have really no kick just goes to show that people never check gun laws any more ALL GUNS ARE LEGAL AND AMMO in most states
DecoratedEvil 1 day ago
Comment removed
ericmck2000 3 days ago
I'd rather use that Lightsaber -- shit! It's just the dislike bar!!
0ntop0fth3world 1 week ago
Legal moron.
kahnspock 1 week ago
Not ILLEGAL btw good troll.
Battleboy441 1 week ago
You do know that these rounds are legal?
xonar778 2 weeks ago
check out my channel, i shoot GUNS and EXPLOSIVES
TheDangerZone999 2 weeks ago
The turkey would already be cooked if you hunted turkey on Thanksgiving with this.
bigmanwithagun12 3 weeks ago
For hunting.
Invisifly2 3 weeks ago
I like the like to dislike ratio here, sometimes I poop in my hand and gently set it in the toilet to make less noise
jedislame 3 weeks ago
1.Open crimp at front of shell. 2.Remove all shot and wadding leaving just propellant in shell. 3. Fill shell with black powder or pyrodex. 4. Pack powder down and recrimp shell.5. Load into old single shot gun and pull trigger.6. enjoy the blast.
supressorgrid 3 weeks ago
Sound suppressing mechanisms for your firearms: no with none of the evidence produced by waking your neighbors.
wikieditspam 4 weeks ago
its not illegal
haydensroomstudios 1 month ago
Dragon's Breath Rounds are only illegal in 4-6 states and NOT illegal in mine. So why title this as "ILLEGAL..12 Gauge (flame-throwers) Dragons Breath Rounds"?
They aren't illegal.
007CTHULHU007 1 month ago
And I ain't trying to sound all trigger happy like omega either that's the 1 percent of gun owners but gun rights are here to stay get over it maybe you should try picking a gun up and shooting it you don't have to kill anything you can shoot cans and such
420x24x7 1 month ago
@superlagg wow your ignorance is amazing
420x24x7 1 month ago
@420x24x7 He's a liberal anti-gun Asshat what do you expect? They only know what they are indoctrinated to know and to them "Guns are bad mmmkay because because guns are mmbad.". They have no concrete evidence to base their stupidity and ignorance on other than their own asinine propaganda they pick up from people that wish to be defenseless sheep.
007CTHULHU007 1 month ago
@ nazer9 what other gun is gonna shoot shotgun ammunition? Oh yeah A SHOTGUN YOU FUCKING RETARDED BITCH.
beatty169 1 month ago
ya'll are so fuckin immature, who da fuck cares, and ya'll gotta bring racism to the table dont you, makes you feel big huh? ya'll are a disgrace to the human nature. idiots
my3000gtvr4 1 month ago
so where did u get these
Pauliebuck 1 month ago
Five bucks a round?
WORTH IT.
TheBio4 1 month ago
'MERICA
NinjaMoose234 2 months ago
...Or I could just put the guy in a choke hold.
JoeRezac005 2 months ago
there not illlegal
XxRpDxKLUtCHxX 2 months ago
100 yards? I see 30 feet
WELLGURU 2 months ago
not illegal
treezy8769 2 months ago
Whomever posted this is a faggot for adding this gay as fuck music
polkstreet 2 months ago
Dear santa
000NES 2 months ago
Not illegal at all bought some today at a gun show didn't even have to sign papers
85maxamillion 2 months ago
slide shows shouldnt be allowed on youtube. this sucked.
remusbeankiller 2 months ago
Not illegal with the proper documentation
TheXJthatCould 2 months ago
Nice description. It's not copied straight from Wikipedia or anything...
TBKclanHD 2 months ago 44
tere not illegal fuck tard.
transformersking3 2 months ago
i live near seneca im gonna get thouse
mw2chap123 3 months ago
Ok,i'm a girl..what the helll am i doing here?
aha00002 3 months ago
@aha00002 good question. fairwell wench, back to the kitchen with you
joeysteez1 3 months ago
@joeysteez1 Wench?..you watch too much movies bro!
aha00002 3 months ago
@aha00002 and you are still not in the kitchen
joeysteez1 3 months ago
@joeysteez1 I AM.. IN THE KITCHEN !! How old are you 11?!!
aha00002 3 months ago
@aha00002 11 and a half bitch. now make my ass a sandwich whore
joeysteez1 3 months ago
@joeysteez1 Make ur ass a sandwich? As in turn ur ass into a sandwich? Probably if i was a guy and if u were gay(which most likely u are!)
aha00002 3 months ago
@aha00002 you are incorrect. but i am still waiting on my sandwich...clocks tickin
joeysteez1 3 months ago
@joeysteez1 :P
aha00002 3 months ago
@aha00002 im just fuckin with you btw. just havin fun
joeysteez1 3 months ago
@joeysteez1 Me too /
aha00002 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
none of those are illegal
justinRkeaton 3 months ago
so weird i never knew you could get ammunition in a plastic case
tigran914 3 months ago
Before black ops 23,652 views, after black ops 589,348
fulldharoks 3 months ago
@fulldharoks lol your a fucken retard what does dragons breath have to do with black ops
WolleytheMonster 3 months ago
@WolleytheMonster it was a shotgun in the game.
imaddictedtowow112 3 months ago
@imaddictedtowow112 it wasnt a shotgun in the game it was the ammunitioned used in the shotgun, the spas-12
nazer9 3 months ago
@nazer9 i know bro. but in the game it was called dragons breath.....
imaddictedtowow112 3 months ago
@imaddictedtowow112 its still a spas-12 and im not your bro.
nazer9 3 months ago
@nazer9 ... I say bro alot. doesent mean you are. also.
Your a real dick, ya know that?
imaddictedtowow112 3 months ago
@imaddictedtowow112 its funny how mad you are getting xD
nazer9 3 months ago 10
@WolleytheMonster no I'm not a retard, and in one of the levels you use dragon breath rounds, I was implying that black ops influences the views of this video. Your the fucking retard.
fulldharoks 3 months ago
@fulldharoks uhh MW3 just came out so no one really gives a shit about black ops anymore it sucks
nazer9 3 months ago
@nazer9 People liked Black Ops before-hand? Woah, I didn't know, THOSE are the retards. :3
999WANA 3 months ago
@999WANA yeah the advertiseing really got a lot of people excited for it till they actually played the game for a little bit and realised it wasnt what they had said
nazer9 3 months ago
ya man good guns need to beat the shit out of some niggers....music.
mainvain820 3 months ago
or is just too passionate for this stuff
Kurogetsu1 3 months ago
judging by the recent comments, richardoblaine was in a failtroll mood
Kurogetsu1 3 months ago
ahahaha my coworker showed me this round the other day.
jdrpepper79 3 months ago
It's a damn shame people start pointless arguments over a video of a guy shooting a shotgun. Seriously, winning an argument over the internet won't get you anything.
crackbaby1058 3 months ago
these are illegal in canada :( to bad they look like fun
BillowyKibbles 3 months ago
These are great. I use em all the time.
richardcblaine72 3 months ago
fps russia
kikass1234566 4 months ago
i know a place that sells these kind of things
madamadam158 4 months ago
Get a fucking VIDEO camera, asshole! Slideshows are for grandma.
royalbrainwave 4 months ago
@lHustonProductionsl I wish there was an option to keep thumbing down over and over in the same session.
UpcomingJedi 4 months ago
And they are all for hunting of course :)
Cannibal713 4 months ago
glad I live in Ky all that stuff is legal
moonpie129 4 months ago
100 yards
alarik95 4 months ago
Authorised hmmm equal protection of the law in my opinion means if someone else law abiding as I am is allowed to own something so shall I under my constitutional protection to have the same liberties as my fellow americans. If someone else can own a machine and we are all created equal the laws must apply to me the same as anyone else hmm seems kinda double standard here in the land of the so called free. Hmm Liberty what does it mean to you? )o,,,
MrSokitumi0007 4 months ago
it looks like a new toy. the package it comes in looks fake. im not saying it is.
MRAXWEDBAF 4 months ago
@MRAXWEDBAF What are you talking about, the package the shells are in? That's exactly what it looks like, though there are a couple companies that load these.
richardcblaine72 3 months ago
the shots that were fired look like fireworks.
nypdplumber22 4 months ago
These are not illegal, at least in the US!
watertower7 4 months ago 21
@watertower7
That's because the US constitution is hilariously flawed.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 4 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Honestly, there is no reason to regulate something like this, it has a range of 25 yards and is only good for starting fires....
watertower7 4 months ago
@watertower7
Oh yeah, because giving people easy access to a shotgun that shoots fire is the single best idea ever.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 4 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey You can't go on mass killings with this sort of thing, so why not?
watertower7 4 months ago
@watertower7
You can burn the fuck out of houses and fuck people up eight ways till Saturday if you hit them, and even if what you say is true there's simply no reason to give the unwashed masses access to that kind of thing. It's just asking for fucking trouble.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 4 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey You can the burn the fuck out of houses and fuck people up with gasoline too so by your rationale we should ban it and all walk.
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968
No, you shouldn't. Because Gasoline isn't flat-out obviously weapon, and actually has any use other than burning things. This does not, and is by definition a weapon. It has no use in casual society; it can't be concealed for self defence and even if it could there's no reason to use Dragon Breath rounds. It can literally only be used for starting fires and showing off to your friends, which will itself inevitably lead to fires. You fail at logic.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Why does something have to be obviously a weapon to be used as one? The answer of course is that it doesn't. Why does something have to be "concealed for self defence"? The answer is that it doesn't. The primary purpose of these rounds is recreation, like fireworks, sports cars, air guns, paint ball guns and a thousand other potentially dangerous things we would ban with your absurd rationale. What about magnesium? Gonna ban that? So much for your attempt at logic.
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968
Nah, you're the one failing at logic. The first clue is that you're trying to argue that a shotgun that shoots fucking fire isn't dangerous and has every reason to be legal. Might wanna re-assess your priorities there, bucko.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey "Nah, you're the one failing at logic. " LOL which is why you failed to address any of the points made. "The first clue is that you're trying to argue that a shotgun that shoots fucking fire isn't dangerous" As opposed to a shotgun that shoots lead projectiles? No not especially dangerous. As opposed to a Corvette that will hit 180, no again not especially dangerous. Name one person ever killed by one of these rounds...I'm waiting.
steve001968 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey
A shotgun round that shoots buckshot is no less dangerous than this you braindead faggot.
omegapoint777 2 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey
You need to be deprived of your 1st Amendment rights.
omegapoint777 2 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey You are the unwashed masses you stupid shit. In your case though I gotta admit you would probably kill yourself with a book of fucking matches but you still have the right to have em.
richardcblaine72 3 months ago
@richardcblaine72
You sure do have a lot of impotent Republican rage, don'cha?
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey You are a stupid little fucktard who will do ANYTHING to try to distract from how little he fucking knows. Dumb fuck.
richardcblaine72 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey
I think people like you need to be shot and killed. Fuck off you anti-freedom piece of shit! You want to rule over and enslave us.
omegapoint777 2 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Not for you. A moron like you could choke with your own fucking shoelace. We should ban those right away to keep your stupid ass alive. Next we can ban fucking flare guns that shoot fire and goddamn road flares that burn, you fucktard.
richardcblaine72 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey No it isn't. It's made to keep people like you who hate and fear freedom and long for a nanny state at bay. It works quite well for that as evidenced by your whining here.
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968
Really? How's that economy working out for ya? And that gun crime? How's that militia (which is supposed to be the only reason gun ownership exists) coming along?
Yeah, I'd say it's pretty flawed.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey The economy, which has nothing to do with this and is just your feeble attempt to distract from the argument you're losing is not effecting me at all. Violent crime, including gun crime is at near record lows and crime with these rounds, which are the only thing at issue here, is, as far as I can tell, non-existent. The supreme has already affirmed the 2nd amendment to guarantee an individual right and the militia is still codeified under US law.
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968
Whatever the fuck you say, big guy. The final fact of the matter is that these have zero reason to be legal, the only reason they are legal is to prepare for a militia that you're never ever gonna actually need, and they have zero practical application other than amusing idiots. Kind of a retarded law system you have there.
Oh, and that arrogant little above-it-all act you just tried to pull? Works better if you spelled the word "affecting" right.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey "Whatever the fuck you say, big guy. " LMAO Now that you've lost every point you're getting upset. Poor baby. In a FREE COUNTRY citizens don't have to justify the need for something, the government has to justify the need to restrict it. I'm still waiting for you to point me to a case where someone has been killed with one of these or even where one has been used unlawfully. You've utterly failed of course.
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968 the only examples of people dying from any 1 of these rounds is from war zones :P
BillowyKibbles 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey
Yeah man, we should just ban everything because fucktarded little shits like you think it's a good idea.
omegapoint777 2 months ago
It also works better if you don't try to actually pull it, seeing as someone who genuinely isn't being affected wouldn't need to draw attention to it.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Now you're just babbling. Did you hit your head on something?
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968
It helps if you read all my comments instead of just focusing on the shortest one. I appreciate you might have problems with long sentences, but bear with me here.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey I have read all your absurd childish comments and have refuted everything you said. At which point you two step off onto something else to distract from the points you already lost. You went from these shotgun rounds, to the fucking economy (LMAO at that one) to guns in general now your whining because I pointed out that your babbling based on the fact that you wrote "It also works better if you don't try to actually pull it..." which is babbling nonsense.
steve001968 3 months ago
Oh, and just a quick exercise in definition? Gun ownership =/= freedom. You'd be amazed how many people get them confused.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Yes given that armed force is the only way to enforce individual rights against a government that no longer respects civil liberties gun ownership is an important right of any people who wish to remain free. Ghaddafi wasn't just overthrown with spitballs. On the upside most dictators from Hitler to Stalin to Amin would agree with you that citizens should not be armed, so you do have that.......but not much else.
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968
Yeah, I somehow doubt your government is in much need of overthrowing. Try not to confuse "my own freedom to own this here shootin'-iron, hyuck" with "freedom of speech and actual important freedoms". You'd be amazed how many people make that mistake as well.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey European Jews didn't think Hitler was a problem either until, of course after they were disarmed and on their way to the gas chambers and it was too late. Fools like you though never learn from history. You can't manage to figure out that governments have killed millions more in the last century than individuals have in the entire time man has been on the planet. I'm still waiting for you to show me where one of these rounds has been used criminally.
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968
Ah, so you're comparing Obama to Hitler now. You do realize that you just did a better job of invalidating your own argument than I ever could, right?
Oh, and the criminal use? I never fucking mentioned it in relation to these things. My entire fucking point, if you hadn't been too busy thinking up counterarguments to read it, was that these has *no* use whatsoever other than showing off and inevitably accidentally starting fires. There's no point in having them legal.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey No I never compared Obama to Hitler. I made the point that an unarmed population is at risk of tyranny and genocide and that people who give up their rights can't predict the future. These concepts are far too difficult for you to wrap your mind around so you start babbling about Obama. I'm still waiting for you to point out an instance of criminal misuse in support of your assertion that they need to be banned and you're still failing miserably.
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968
"I'm still waiting for you to point out an instance of criminal misuse in support of your assertion that they need to be banned and you're still failing miserably."
Are you even capable of reading? I've stated my main point several times, I won't do it again.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey ""I'm still waiting for you to point out an instance of criminal misuse in support of your assertion that they need to be banned and you're still failing miserably."
Are you even capable of reading? I've stated my main point several times, I won't do it again."
You don't have a point. You've pretty much conceded they aren't misused. Basically, the scarry pyrotechnics frighten you and you want to inconvenience everyone for your insipid paranoia.
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968
Lol, no. You're failing at this whole reading thing again. My point is that they have no sensible reason to be legal, non whatsoever, and the only reason they are is because idiots like you start piping up about civil liberties at the merest mention of a change to gun laws. As for paranoia, really? I wasn't the one trying to use Hitler as a reason to be allowed to have a ridiculous and useless fire-shotgun.
Lax gun laws are an oversight, not a god-given privilege.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey So called "lax gun laws are a constitutional right. Period. You are scared (because you're a coward) of a simple pyrotechnic device. You are too stupid to realize that anybody who buys something made of magnesium can simply file it, load the filings into a shotshell along with some powder and a shotcup and get essentially the same effect. So now are you going to ban Magnesium because you are afraid what it can be used for?
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968
Nope, because magnesium can be used for other things. As I've stated many times before, those shells have literally no other application. However. Your childish default to accusing me of being scared and the fact that you honestly seem to think you'd stand any chance against a totalitarian dictator with what you can buy a gun store leads to to believe I'm arguing with either a minor or a particularly stupid Republican.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey You have no reason to ban this other than you want to. Period. Small arms have been used successfully against superpowers to include the US and Russia in 4 wars in the past 50 years. Since you obviously think technological superiority guarantees military victory you must think the US won Vietnam and the Russians still control Afghanistan. That makes you too stupid for me to continue to converse with. Have a nice day and please please stay in whatever country you are in.
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968
Ah, I see you chose to go the "choose to believe this means I've won" route. Have fun continuing to fail at reading, hugs and kisses.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Well of course I won. You couldn't win an argument with yourself. You went from stating the need to ban a recreational device............why again.........oh that's right no reason at all, to babbling about the economy which has nothing to do with anything, when that distraction didn't work you started babling about guns in general. All because your reason to ban something comes down to 'Well uhh uhhh uhhh duhhh [scratch head, drool] I just don't see why people need it".
steve001968 3 months ago
Comment removed
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@steve001968
Oh hay, turns out you can read. Just not very well. Look at it like this. Can you think of one good reason (and for the record, some bullshit about civil liberties and recreational devices is not a good reason) that the shotgun that shoots fire should actually be fucking legal?
Oh, and falling back once again on internet slang and pretending I'm stupid isn't valid either. I know it works on the other kids in middle school, but things are a little different here.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@steve001968
Yeah, exactly.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@steve001968
As such, I'm going to stop now because it's abundantly clear neither one of us is ever going to back down or stop trying to pick retarded holes in the other's arguments and this is more or less like trying to talk to a brick fucking wall. A brick wall with a boner for firearms.
I'm going now. You can choose to believe this means you've won, if you'd like. Have fun with your delusions and apparent illiteracy, Steve.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Dude, you better go see a Dr. for fucking whiplash cause you got slapped around like a fucking rag doll. LMFAO
richardcblaine72 3 months ago
@richardcblaine72
Oh hay, more internet acronyms in place of the actual ability to read. Just brightens up my day.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Poor little fucktard. If I couldnt read i wouldnt know you got slapped around like a rag doll. You stupid shit.
richardcblaine72 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey You stupid fucker there is no reason for them to be illegal and the reason for them to be legal is because people have fun using them. Businesses also make money producing and selling them. The people using them are happy to pay the businesses making and selling them and the people working for the businesses are happy to have the money to pay their bills. The only people who aren't happy are whiny little pussy fags like you who worry about what everybody else is doing.
richardcblaine72 3 months ago
@steve001968
Oh, and for the record the pyrotechnics are frankly fucking awesome. Why would I be watching a youtube video about it in the first place if I was scared of the damn thing? Moreover, why the fuck would I be scared of the thing when I don't even live in the same country as it?
You really gotta learn to think these things through. Steve.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey LMAO so you want to ban something that you can't find any history of misuse of and that can't possibly affect you.............why again? Just because?? You've lost your whole argument yet again. LMFAO some more. Bye.
steve001968 3 months ago
"No I never compared Obama to Hitler."
Lessee, shall we?
"Yeah, I somehow doubt your government is in much need of overthrowing."
"European Jews didn't think Hitler was a problem either until, of course after they were disarmed and on their way to the gas chambers and it was too late."
Seeing as your current government is the Obama administration, and you brought up Hitler in direct response to your current government being mentioned...
One of these things is not like the other.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey The comparison to Obama is yours and your alone. I never compared the current administration to Hitler or anything else. I never said a threat came from the current administration. I simply pointed out that unarmed populations are vulnerable to genocide. You then made multiple baseless assumptions which you are trying to use to prop up your pathetic argument. Again your 'logic' falls apart. What are you about 13?
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968
Nope. Seeing as most of your arguments thus far have been based on not actually bothering to read what's been put down and then denying doing things you obviously just fucking did, you're in no position to make accusations of logic.
Still, at least this is a big entertaining flame war for everyone.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@steve001968
Additional point, although with your current show of stubborn-ness quite obviously not going to be final. If the American government was *really* planning a takeover, do you honestly think they'd let you keep your fancy little guns? Do you honestly think that you'd be able to hold out against them with your civilian bullshit? Because if so, you might wanna think again.
Oh, and try not to bring up Ghaddafi this time. It's a totally different case to what you're proposing.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey
"If the American government was *really* planning a takeover, do you honestly think they'd let you keep your fancy little guns? Do you honestly think that you'd be able to hold out against them with your civilian bullshit?" LMAO The American government doesn't have to take over, it's in control now BWAHAHAHA do you even read this stupidity before you post it?
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968
Ah, typed laughter. The true sign of a level mind. I also like the way you used said laughter to avoid having to address the actual point there. You knew damn well what the fuck I meant. Cute, that.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey "Do you honestly think that you'd be able to hold out against them with your civilian bullshit? Because if so, you might wanna think again."
Based on this idiotic rationale the US won in Vietnam, the Russians won in Afghanistan, and we have pacified Iraq and Afghanistan since you seem to believe that technological superiority guarantees military victory. Probably the stupidist assumption you've made yet. Oh yeah, and Gaddafi is still in power. LMAO
steve001968 3 months ago
@steve001968
The Viet Cong won with military ware. The Taliban are using military ware. Three guesses what Ghaddafi was taken down with. Hate to break it to ya, Steve, but your shitty little civilian .223 single shot really isn't going to be able to stand up to what the government are gonna be able to role out.
Notice how I said "Civilian". Important word there. Reading isn't your strong suite, is it?
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Hey, dumfuck, most casualties in all those wars were inflicted with small arms, and IED's that can be easily made from AN fertilizer. Small arms are used by irregular forces to secure more powerful weapons. Conventional armies almost always lose to irregular forces because they can't effectively target them and when they try they kill civillians, the relatives of whom then turn against them. The US and the Russians have learned it when the fuck will you?
richardcblaine72 3 months ago
@richardcblaine72
So? IEDs have nothing to do with gun laws. I'm merely stating that what you can buy at the average gun store really isn't going to be much help against what the US army can roll out. Note that most of the militias that you listed were using military grade supplies and weapons, not the nerfed shit available for civilian use in the US.
You have the same problem as Steve, in that you seem to be unable to decide what you're actually arguing.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Poor little fucktard you dont know what you are talking about. The small arms available in US gun stores are the same as the small arms used around the world except for the lack of full fucking auto which is usually not needed and they can be converted in no time if it was. Also fucktard go google tannerite which is sold on the internet and in gun stores all over America, If you think this should be banned your fucktard ass will piss your pants when you see that.
richardcblaine72 3 months ago
@richardcblaine72
Christ, you are such a coward.
"Fuck, fuck, fuck, fag! Fuck, fuck! Oh this makes me feel so strong!"
Grow a pair, loser...
youbetterbelievehah 3 months ago
@youbetterbelievehah Christ your such a fuckwitt who couldn't argue your way out of a paperbag. Whoever did your lobotomy needs to give you a refund. They took out to fucking much.
richardcblaine72 2 months ago
@richardcblaine72
Well, I apparently put you in your place, you mindless coward. Learn to spell, please.
youbetterbelievehah 2 months ago
@youbetterbelievehah You poor pathetic Little fucktard you couldn't put a fucking chair in it's place.
richardcblaine72 2 months ago
@richardcblaine72
Aww, you feel better now you weak little coward?
youbetterbelievehah 2 months ago
@youbetterbelievehah You're off the meds again aren't ya? That's the only explanation for your fucktard posts.
richardcblaine72 2 months ago
@richardcblaine72
Aww, is the coward still trying to make himself feel like a tough guy by typing fuck as many times as he can? How cute!
youbetterbelievehah 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@youbetterbelievehah "Aww, is the coward still trying to make himself feel like a tough guy"
Evidently you are. You're still babbling.
richardcblaine72 2 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Last I checked, you stupid fuck, Ghaddafi was taken down with a bullet in the head. Yeah dumbass that's a bullet. Who the fuck has a .223 SINGLE SHOT? My beta C's for my AR-15's hold 100 rounds EACH you dumb shit. .223 ain't gonna stand up huh? Guess that's why every fucking NATO country issues a rifle in 5.56/.223 to their soldiers, you stupid fucktard. Tell the Dr that did your lobotomy he cut out too much and you want your fucking $ back.
richardcblaine72 3 months ago
@richardcblaine72 what the fuck are you bitching about, that things are dangerous and that bullets are cool? Cus, we already know that.
Superlagg 3 months ago
@Superlagg You have ADD in addition to being a fucktard huh? Congratulations youve lost every single point you tried to make and are too stupid to even remember what they were.
richardcblaine72 3 months ago
@richardcblaine72
One: .223 =/= .5.57 in anything except basic size. You have a shitty little civilian variant. If it's regulated to something other than semi-auto, it is illegal. Therefore, against the shit that the US army could roll out (and that's what he was actually arguing here, Ghaddafi was taken down with military ware purchased from the black market and is a completely different proposition) it'd be fucking useless. Again, might wanna check what was actually being argued.
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey Hey dumb fuck the US military dumped FA on the M4 way back because it's NOT NEEDED. Semi auto fire is more accurate and conserves ammo. Not that youre dumb ass would know that. You stupid fuck you think civillian US weapons are single shot. Where the fuck do you even buy a single shot .223????? Most of the shit the US military can roll out is USELESS in urban areas because of collateral damage not that your dumb ass knows what that is either. Stupid shit.
richardcblaine72 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey And dumbshit it's 5.56 not 5.57 you moron and you couldnt tell 5.56 from .223 if they were side by side and you had a fucking magnifying glass.They are almost identical. Also FA weapons including machine guns are not illegal in the US. They are just tax stamped. On top of that SA can be converted to FA by almost anyone if needed even though it really isn't. Not you though youre probably too fucking stupid to tie your own shoes without help.
richardcblaine72 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@richardcblaine72
Fucking hell, you're still on this? Do you honestly not have anything better to do, Republifag?
HypaSonicDeathMonkey 3 months ago
@HypaSonicDeathMonkey SHUT THE FUCK UP IGNORANT NIGGER.
omegapoint777 2 months ago
@omegapoint777 People like you are the reason why guns should be banned, violent assholes thinking that the ability to murder people equals freedom. Who are you to say what freedom is, and who should have it? Why is having the ability to murder those who dont agree with you the only gauge of freedom? I thought freedom was the ability to live a life unmolested by psychopaths, not wave around implements of war and murder to pretend they are a real person.
Superlagg 2 months ago
@Superlagg
You aren't going to ban guns here. End of debate. You have no right to go around and tell people what they may own. I have the freedom to own firearms and you aren't going to stop me, nor will any government.
omegapoint777 2 months ago
@Superlagg "I thought freedom was the ability to live a life unmolested by psychopaths, "
Gee I wonder who a "psychopath" would rather "molest" one of you little pacifists with no weapons or me with a .45 auto and a bunch of those scary 'assault weapons'. Personally if I was the psychopath I would consider you fresh meat and me a potentially dangerous individual best left the fuck alone. Psychopaths are not stupid. People who refuse to be armed for their own defense are.
richardcblaine72 2 months ago
@Superlagg Don't listen to omegapoint777 he is just a little internet tough guy troll. He isn't actually capable of anything. Just another scrawny little white kid with big ears that get red when he's mad and pretends to play a white racist for attention. hahaha
PomonaPunkRock 1 month ago
@PomonaPunkRock oh I know, trolls are hilarious
Superlagg 1 month ago
@Superlagg yup! haha
PomonaPunkRock 1 month ago
@Superlagg Last time I checked, you can't change anything on the Bill of Rights. Guns are the main reason why the United States of America is a country. If you're about to be mugged by some low life welfare recipient or you're protecting your family from being raped and then killed, which is faster? Pulling a gun and killing that sorry bastard, or calling the police, the criminal seeing this happen, kills you with whatever weapon he chooses. I think you may want to rethink your argument.
OkAyAtGaMiN 1 month ago
@OkAyAtGaMiN if youre getting mugged, pulling a gun will just get you and whoever's dumb enough to be around you killed. All guns are is just a power fantasy, they make you feel like you're less of a retarded hick with no future. You dont need to kill people at the drop of a hat, the constitution doesnt say anywhere that you have the right to be a psychopath that's fully willing and able to murder someone he doesnt agree with. Just because its legal doesnt meen its not a bad idea.
Superlagg 1 month ago
You are an incredibly idiot to believe what you believe. I have a Handgun Carry Permit and I find it offensive to see people as ignorant as you...fucking GD liberal gun control advocates WHINING about the our RIGHT TO BARE ARMS. THe FACTS are that people carrying their own firearms REDUCES crime especially when they carry openly and when you ban them you ban them for LEGAL carriers.
You get back to me now when you're beaten and raped in your arse by a group of thugs because you weren't armed.
007CTHULHU007 1 month ago
@Superlagg Just because your have ignorant uneducated thoughts doesn't mean you should post them.
007CTHULHU007 1 month ago