Well, in fact, human activity is estimated to produce some 6 billion tons of CO2 but other processes on Earth produce 200 billion tons, rendering anything humans produce as almost irrelevant. That's it. There is no reason to do anything, nor can anything be done, especially in ignorance of geophysical processes and dynamics. Unclear whether CO2 is significantly causal, either, upon any "warming" process occurring.
current CO2 levels are at 389 ppm and rising. it wont be long before antarctica begins to thaw as fast as greenland currently is, which btw is rising out of the sea at a rate of 1 inch per year. when antarctica thaws enough it too will rise out of the sea. it is connected to every tectonic plate around the world and will crack the earths crust. this isnt doomsday bull, this is science, and quite likely the worse threat facing mankind.
No need to worry global cooling has started. The Planet's temperatures are now plummeting to new lows. The pendulum has swung in the opposite direction look out for freezing winters.
@vexviper If Greenland and Antarctica melt people will not stfu...because global sea levels will be 250 feet higher and every coastal city will be fucked, along with about a billion people.
Actually when you compare the melt against the reforming...we are in serious trouble. There is a strong likelihood that a sizable chunk will break off all at once in the next 5 years that could cause a tsunami 300 ft tall to hit Europe and the Eastern seaboard of the USA.
Meadrose, where are you thinking exactly? The effects of a tsunami caused by the Jakobshavn glacier would only be felt in the Disko bay and maybe as far away as Baffin Island.
Jeg skal kjøre min Ford til den Fjord, så komme om bord! Vet du at Fjord er den ord? Alle vet at Fjord er den ord! Kom til de Fjorder før isen er bort! :D
Well you and roidroid talking about fords and fjords.. I just thought I'd have a bit of fun with it since fjord is a norwegian word.. so why not talk about driving a ford to the fjord in norwegian?
The effects on climate change don´t have to do with smoking, rather, they are affected by industry of many sorts... If it´s true that we are only tipping the balance on the climate crisis, it is also true that most of our productive processes and natural resources exploitation does cause harsh consequences to our environment. Make a change!
@grraadd They've studied Greenland for decades, and taken core samples going back 600,000 years...yes it is very scientific. Deny, deny, deny everything.
@grraadd This argument is laughable. Science takes time. Also, scientists are using many different observations concerning different variables all over the world. Every scientific academy on the planet agrees that man-made global warming is a reality. None do not (there isn't one that says there is 'another side to the story'). Look it up for yourself. If this is as serious as the scientists are warning, we need to do something about it.
@ChristopherRDennis please do... just don't force me to pay some cunning scumbags (they still cooperate to cook data - new batch of e-mails shows that clearly) my last euros!
stop arguing if this is true or not. the important is we know how to help to save the earth. even though is not true that someday earth will be lost. here's the idea there is no permanent in this world. you have house and you know someday that its gonna be old but if you know how to clean and you are doing the maintenance it would stay longer. same with the earth. the only difference we can buy a house we can transfer if we want. but is there any other earth?
This is environmentalist propaganda bs! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let's get the science correct!
Some of you on YT may be too young to remember but 30 years ago the world was afraid that the earth was going to freeze over. Five years ago (and till this present day) they said the earth is going to get to hot to live on. Now, after Mother Nature has decided to turn the tables on the envirn movement (EM) twice the EM has decided to call it "Climate Change". Please! This is pure propoganda.
So it no longer matters if the earth gets hot or cold- it's "Climate Change". Where's the science?? Of course there is climate change. The climate changes ALL THE TIME!
Jesus people, open your eyes & use your heads! If the ozone layer is depleting in the antartic/artic then why isn't it getting hotter where you or I live?? Why is the destruction ALWAYS occuring in the most remote places on earth - where masses of people cannot confirm it & never in cities??
And what is govt's/environmentalists solution to "Climate Change"? Taxes - like always!! So it's ok to polute the environment as long as you can afford to pay to polute it. If it's really a problem, why do govt officials travel by private jets? Why do they always have fleets of SUV's to travel the streets in?
Come on people, learn to recognize a scam when you sniff one.
I'm not saying we should not conserve and preserve. But let's not make up excuses for PBP's and new taxes.
stop arguing if this is true or not. the important is we know how to help to save the earth. even though is not true that someday earth will be lost. here's the idea there is no permanent in this world. you have house and you know someday that its gonna be old but if you know how to clean and you are doing the maintenance it would stay longer. same with the earth. the only difference we can buy a house we can transfer if we want. but is there any other earth?
the majority of people will say they want to, but still drive their 13mpg suvs around. that and oil and car company lobbyists preventing helpful bills from passing.
attempt-yes, accomplish any realistically helpful goals-no.
i also think that saying that glo. war. isn't our fault is a good excuse not to do anything to change our unnatural(more like removed completely from nature)lifestyles. my two cents.
is there any solid proof or is it just theory about this whole global warming...the arctic is losing ice while he antarctic is gaining ice at an unprecedented rate. sea levels are not rising...every hear of the urban heat sink phenomenon...look into it. global warming isnt cold hard fact...
granted, the sun does melt the top layer of glaciers every year, but its getting much worse. global warming is no myth, its completely due to pollution and human emmissions. polar bears are dying now that every summer is getting worse and taking their hunting habitat away before hibernation. something should be done.
you are typical... polar bears? trying to get to the beary side of my heart!!!?? global warming is bull!!!!! if you listen to scientists then you would hear that a moose produces more carbon monoxide gas in a day than a car does in a year.
i know for a fact that thats not true, animals only produce about a percent of the greenhouse gases that humans do with fossil fuels. and the fact that there are 6,000,000,000 people in this world that have a car, have been in one, or want one makes it worse. and thats only civilian pollution, not to mention the mass companies that release pollution. i guess by your theory the kyoto protocol is meaningless and the depleting animal habitats are just bull. ... ignorance.
it pretty much is bullshit saying that it's our fault that it is happening. it isn't ours, the world was a ball of ice and it started melting through the middle and spreading up and down to show the world as it is
What's to hate - that people are using their heads and will no longer believe what they see on television just because it's on television?
It hasn't been getting warmer where I live. It snowed in Canada two days ago. We're still in OCTOBER!! Where's the warming? Open your eyes and observe things for yourself. Don't believe things just because it's coming from the mainstream media.
You obviously don't understand how climate change works and using your personal observations to disprove it is analogous to saying that smoking doesn't cause cancer because you don't know anyone who smokes and has cancer. We can agree that winter in Canada sucks, but it's supposed to be 10 degrees above normal the next few days. Hmmm... maybe you'll change you're mind then.
You're right - I don't know shit about climate change. And the reason I don't know is because the effects are not obvious. Otherwise if they were obvious then the science would be solid - which it obviously isn't.
What I do know is a little about statistics. And I know ALOT of smokers (I am one). In fact I live in a country of smokers and you know what? The rate of cnacer is no higher here than in any other country.
Now if the rate here was higher I might say to myself "hey, there may just be a link between smoking and cancer". But I WOULD NOT just believe the link because the media tells me there is. That's what science is for. First you hypothesize a link, then you isolate the external variables that could affect your study, then you observe and then you make a conclusion. It's called "the scientific method" - which obviously isn't being used in this realm.
Fair enough. I don't think the effects of climate change are as dire as the "media" make them out to be either but scientific data has shown that the global climate is changing. I'm not even saying it's man-made, just that I've seen enough scientific data to know that something is going on. I can understand you're point of view though... from one canuck smoker to another :Y
Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying we shouldn't "clean up our act" (sorry). I just wouldn't want to see the whole thing get manipulated so that the govt's of the world can have a pretext for alterior motives.
I just find it strange that the affects of "climate change" are being pushed as being 'dire' yet I've yet to see any affects here (in Europe) nor in Canada when I lived there. So why are the supposed affects so drastic in remote places?
I would like to get off the use of oil (I think we're going to be forced to eventually - it can't last forever). But I certainly do not think carbon dioxcide is a pollutant and I certainly would not like to see the citizens of nations be taxed for breathing.
so i guess we should just go down the street and buy some cancer sticks huh? stupid idiots that smoke have no idea of the damage it does to you later in life.
What are you - 12 years old? If you don't smoke how do you know what it does to you? My grandfather, A life-long smoker died at the age of 82. Until the age of 80 he was still working construction. My Grandmother, who lived with a family of smokers is still alive at 81. What do you know about the science of smoking and health/cancer? I suspect only what you hear in the media and not much else.
who the hell...allows an 80 year old man...work in construction? and you call others blue-eyed for believing what they hear. hypocrite.
ALSO, the point of "smoking is bad for you" isn't that you WILL get cancer and die. but that you CAN. I'm positive that there are looots of people who would counter your story with how they had to care for and look after their mother for several years who was dying in lung-cancer.
the point is: it's a risk, it's dumb to take it because it's your life.
Thats my point. Why ISN'T it obvious where I live. Where the SUV's are? Where indusrty is? Why are the affects ALWAYS seen where the air should be the cleanest - like in the artic? How is it possible that the polution we make here never seems to affect our climate but affects the climate some remote place on earth?
Come on people, use your brain. Stop believing the media hype.
If you are smokeing and dont know the effects, then you shouldn't be smokeing....but, seriously...who doesn't know the effects of smokeing now n' days?!?!
No one is saying that we should not reduce our use of 'fossil' fuels (you really believe that oil comes from dinasaurs??). What they are saying is let's not use the politics of fear to propogate an agenda that has alterior motives. People who believe in the fear factor are the ignorant ones.
And the reduction of animal habitats has far more to do with urban sprawl - the incursion into their habitants by ours and not "climate change".
@oomblikkies 1. your statement is factually incorrect 2. a photograph is all you need to reconstruct the size of a glacier 100 years ago. of course, that is not as exact as a measurement: but by far exact enough to give you an assesssment.
@charms2 how can you reconstruct the size of an old glacier from a recent photo? How do you know if the extrapolation is linear, logarithmic, quadratic, etc. etc.
@oomblikkies You can easily messure the retreat many years ago by looking at vegetation around the glacier. A glacier moving forward will also push a wall of rocks in front of it, creating a morain when it starts retreating. These morains and geological conditions around them will also tell a great deal about the movement of the glacier several hundred years ago.
@greeeeh Okay, let us assume you are right. What does this tell us? That Greenland is returning to the state when the Vikings farmed there. Anything special about that? No - earth does go through these warmer and colder climatic periods.
@oomblikkies They currently do farm on Greenland. Greenland was named Greenland by Eric the Red because he was hoping people would be eager to go there because of the name. The settlement, however, did nto last long because of harsh conditions. You should study up on this stuff before making statements like above.
@WaxItYourself Yes, that is the popular claim by alarmists, but science has a different story. Carbon dating of organic residues found in todays glaciers shows that large parts of Greenland was indeed habitable in the medieval period.
@oomblikkies Notice I said 'the settlement did not last long due to the harsh conditions'. Greenland is as warm today as it was back then. Greenland is still habitable and farming is currently done on Greenland. Of course this has nothing to do with the reality or non-reality of anthropogenic global warming which is what your term 'alarmists' implies. If you want to talk about science you can start by looking up the greenhouse effect.
@WaxItYourself Ha, ha - you want me to read about the greenhouse effect. Perhaps you should have a look at inrared absorption spectra of CO2 and water, the equilibrium between H2O and CO2, hydrogen bonding in H2O, latent heat of H2O, dispersion of uv- and IR-rays by clouds, limitations in the models used for climate prediction, toxicity of CO2, etc. Have a nice Xmas.
@oomblikkies Ahh, the old 14.5/15 micrometers argument and a bunch of other old arguments including the 'hotspot' and cloud dimming. Now maybe you can explain to me what the medieval warm period has to do with todays warming. It's well known the this period fell in the Medieval Maximum and solar input was a major contributing factor.
@charms2 "Observed in History" Sadly, Humanity hasnt been monitoring the worlds ice for very long. The only time it got recorded before the late 1800's is when something HUGE and noticable happened. Losing Ice in Antarctica or Far North at a gradual rate, is well; News, but something that could have been going on for thousands of years before we noticed it.
1. Glaciers have been monitored for 200 +years, ever since the last expansion in 1850. While it is true that most of the original data is fairly unreliable (the "length" of a glacier is not properly defined, the mass is hard to measure), direct observation is by no means the only possibility of exploring the earth climate in the past: measurements of ice cores, tree rings, investigation of strata etc all indict that this is man made
Only politicians or politically influenced people (like Penn influenced by libertarians) say what's happening is normal. You won't find a single real scientific journal that says it's normal. Not one.
sorry i voted you down, i meant to vote you up :S its an overwhelming result isn't it, based on the scientific method, the probability that every scientific journal would say its not normal... its frustratingly complexing to try to understand why people dont take this as good information and still refute it when hard workers have collected the data... ask the opposition... Have you got anything to show its normal? Where is your information coming from?
They just borrow words from a couple of ex weather broadcasters that have never done any research and they believe them because they are old, they look smart and they tell them what they want to hear. Id tell all of them to go pick up an issue of nature environment, or at least new scientist.
Wow! Ice is melting! That must mean it is entirely made by humans! Nevermind that there was a previous Ice Age, this is totally different!
We better give Al Gore an award of some kind and pray that he will start a multi-billion dollar company that will tax our oxygen and save us from ourselves!
I bet you anything this video makes the hippies cry.That is why I drive an SUV, just to piss off the gay hippies in Boulder.
for every action there is a reaction, humans are doing actions that haven't been done before, and hence there will be a certain reaction to it, in this case, most likely causing glaciers to melt
This is so stupid... But i love my mom deeply... And i don't want to take any chances. Sorry. If you do not copy and paste this onto 10 videos your mom will die in 4 hours
Higher carbon levels aren't necessary a bad thing, its just that many things cannot get used to it fast enough. If global warming was spread out more then we wouldn't have a problem.
I can sense liberals starting to rally. Guys, we can help but let's be serious, there are many more important things in our world to do for us to put global warming in our number 1 priority.
I never met a alcoholic who truly kicked the habit for good. Nor a permanent ex-smoker, except the ones who are dead.
Humans won't break their dependance on wasteful living. Whether we cause global warming or its a natural cycle, it will happen nomatter what we lamely attempt to do.
Human beings will soon exhausted various resources, this will lead to either better management, or outright bigoted war over what is left. The UK announced an 80% reduction in it's carbon emissions today. If the USA doesn't elect an oil swigging cretin for president in the forthcoming elections, then perhaps we will see similar policy spreading to other places too.
dunno its an addiction..as most commonly said..im a smoker..there are limitations too..shit like carbon we can slow that down if its true what they say that we helped in fukni it all up..or its a natural thing ..but we need new cars that produce the same amount of power,the cars might have to be bigger or shrink the battery but im sure some shit like electric could even be safer
personally i don't believe in the whole climate change thing i know theres natural change over time but i don't think humans are contributing to it when a volcano erupts it puts out 10x as much carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than humans have in ten years.
Well - I was exaggerating. But that music is so 8th grade science when the things discussed in these videos actually involve significant graduate level research. I think the music really underplays that. I'm a big believer in the details of things when it comes to presentations ... I think some types of classical music would sound much more appropriate as an opening sound byte.
you're overlooking the unimportantance within the video ;P it's fine how it is, it's more like a signature than a '8th grade science' theme, that's how i'd recognise the video's theirs.
I already lauded the content of the show ... I don't follow what you're insinuating by saying I am overlooking the 'unimportance within the video' ... My job is making presentations and I would never put anything as tacky as that music for the kind of profound information that's discussed. The fact that you can recognize it because of the music doesn't mean anything. In the future, a better music byte that played repeatedly would also make you identify this series with that sound byte.
Well Sarah Palin's said that she doesn't believe its due to human activities and she's apparently an educated potential world leader. Shows how stupid people can be!
Actually, there is natural climate change and there is change from human activities. Scientists have agreed on the human factor since the 1940s. With all due respect, maybe you could get your facts from scientists and not republican opinion printed in the wall street journal.
I've tried to make this point to so many people. Global climate change due to human activity is not a political debate, it's a scientific debate, and scientists agree that it occurs.
Relax, scientists have found that the ice is getting thicker in arctic. You have to have a view of the whole global to realize that this isn't anything out of the norm. Ice melts here and it forms there. Ice forms here and it melts there. On and on...
It's when some grab a story and blow it up and say over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over...
Well, in fact, human activity is estimated to produce some 6 billion tons of CO2 but other processes on Earth produce 200 billion tons, rendering anything humans produce as almost irrelevant. That's it. There is no reason to do anything, nor can anything be done, especially in ignorance of geophysical processes and dynamics. Unclear whether CO2 is significantly causal, either, upon any "warming" process occurring.
MisterMumps 1 month ago
great video thanks
ericajjful 1 month ago
some sweet info here
alexasmithy 1 month ago
well the most recent ice age is over, so i don't think they'll be growing back any time soon. this is not a crisis.
Noise509 3 months ago
current CO2 levels are at 389 ppm and rising. it wont be long before antarctica begins to thaw as fast as greenland currently is, which btw is rising out of the sea at a rate of 1 inch per year. when antarctica thaws enough it too will rise out of the sea. it is connected to every tectonic plate around the world and will crack the earths crust. this isnt doomsday bull, this is science, and quite likely the worse threat facing mankind.
vengencefrom1979 4 months ago
and the water compresses the sea bottom causing earthquakes, why not mention a valid point.
zimmy81 5 months ago
Carbon tax... Quick! LOL
UnitedCorpOfAmerica 5 months ago
would want to be standing on that thing
stevencraig349 8 months ago
No need to worry global cooling has started. The Planet's temperatures are now plummeting to new lows. The pendulum has swung in the opposite direction look out for freezing winters.
david222444 9 months ago
I can't wait until they all melt so people will stfu about it.
vexviper 1 year ago
@vexviper If Greenland and Antarctica melt people will not stfu...because global sea levels will be 250 feet higher and every coastal city will be fucked, along with about a billion people.
squamish4244 8 months ago
@squamish4244 Good I can't wait! Then people will stfu!
vexviper 8 months ago
I don't see how glaciers shrinking is a crisis. Here's a phenomena you may not have realized yet: Ice Melts!
5277407 1 year ago
happens every year since it formed ......
Dragonstud 1 year ago
Where's the Crisis?
is the research funding dwindling since we haven't all died of heat stroke yet?
jwboll 1 year ago
Actually when you compare the melt against the reforming...we are in serious trouble. There is a strong likelihood that a sizable chunk will break off all at once in the next 5 years that could cause a tsunami 300 ft tall to hit Europe and the Eastern seaboard of the USA.
meadrose 2 years ago
Meadrose, where are you thinking exactly? The effects of a tsunami caused by the Jakobshavn glacier would only be felt in the Disko bay and maybe as far away as Baffin Island.
ReisendeEuropa 2 years ago
I bet Al Gore paid for this with our tax dollars.....dick....
SUMMER....ICE melts...
Winter.....ice forms....
Hmmmm......seems normal to me...
NO PROBLEM !
rushforce33 2 years ago
Don't you know about the Fjord?
Fjord is the word
roidroid 2 years ago
Ford?
razorflown2 2 years ago
No, no, Fjord!
Fjord is the word
Havn't you heard, about the Fjord?
Everybody knows that the Fjord is the word
roidroid 2 years ago
Ford?
razorflown2 2 years ago
Fjord er den ord.. så kom om bord... Vet du at Fjord er den ord?! Alle vet at Fjord er den ord!
ReisendeEuropa 2 years ago
totally, I drive a Ford Ranger
razorflown2 2 years ago
Jeg skal kjøre min Ford til den Fjord, så komme om bord! Vet du at Fjord er den ord? Alle vet at Fjord er den ord! Kom til de Fjorder før isen er bort! :D
ReisendeEuropa 2 years ago
Ya, sorry, I don't speak retard.
razorflown2 2 years ago
Well you and roidroid talking about fords and fjords.. I just thought I'd have a bit of fun with it since fjord is a norwegian word.. so why not talk about driving a ford to the fjord in norwegian?
ReisendeEuropa 2 years ago
lol, what the shit. That's funny. awesome.
razorflown2 2 years ago
fjord and word dont rhyme
Pyroney 2 years ago
So, it melts in the summer and forms again in the winter? How is that "in crisis"?
ultratacoRX7 2 years ago 3
The effects on climate change don´t have to do with smoking, rather, they are affected by industry of many sorts... If it´s true that we are only tipping the balance on the climate crisis, it is also true that most of our productive processes and natural resources exploitation does cause harsh consequences to our environment. Make a change!
arquemond 3 years ago
Studying glacier for a year and talking about crisis... Very scientific :-(
These processes are so slow that you need hundreds of years to form any conclusions (remember about natural fluctuations).
Glaciers in Scotland or around Baltic Sea are extinct but you are not crying about it.
grraadd 3 years ago 4
@grraadd They've studied Greenland for decades, and taken core samples going back 600,000 years...yes it is very scientific. Deny, deny, deny everything.
squamish4244 8 months ago
@grraadd This argument is laughable. Science takes time. Also, scientists are using many different observations concerning different variables all over the world. Every scientific academy on the planet agrees that man-made global warming is a reality. None do not (there isn't one that says there is 'another side to the story'). Look it up for yourself. If this is as serious as the scientists are warning, we need to do something about it.
ChristopherRDennis 2 months ago
@ChristopherRDennis please do... just don't force me to pay some cunning scumbags (they still cooperate to cook data - new batch of e-mails shows that clearly) my last euros!
grraadd 2 months ago
Proof for all the non-believers. The earth is changing and we are stuck in the middle. Heed the warning, make a change.
arquemond 3 years ago
stop arguing if this is true or not. the important is we know how to help to save the earth. even though is not true that someday earth will be lost. here's the idea there is no permanent in this world. you have house and you know someday that its gonna be old but if you know how to clean and you are doing the maintenance it would stay longer. same with the earth. the only difference we can buy a house we can transfer if we want. but is there any other earth?
bscs2a 3 years ago
This is environmentalist propaganda bs! PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let's get the science correct!
Some of you on YT may be too young to remember but 30 years ago the world was afraid that the earth was going to freeze over. Five years ago (and till this present day) they said the earth is going to get to hot to live on. Now, after Mother Nature has decided to turn the tables on the envirn movement (EM) twice the EM has decided to call it "Climate Change". Please! This is pure propoganda.
jagiar 3 years ago
So it no longer matters if the earth gets hot or cold- it's "Climate Change". Where's the science?? Of course there is climate change. The climate changes ALL THE TIME!
Jesus people, open your eyes & use your heads! If the ozone layer is depleting in the antartic/artic then why isn't it getting hotter where you or I live?? Why is the destruction ALWAYS occuring in the most remote places on earth - where masses of people cannot confirm it & never in cities??
jagiar 3 years ago
And what is govt's/environmentalists solution to "Climate Change"? Taxes - like always!! So it's ok to polute the environment as long as you can afford to pay to polute it. If it's really a problem, why do govt officials travel by private jets? Why do they always have fleets of SUV's to travel the streets in?
Come on people, learn to recognize a scam when you sniff one.
I'm not saying we should not conserve and preserve. But let's not make up excuses for PBP's and new taxes.
jagiar 3 years ago
stop arguing if this is true or not. the important is we know how to help to save the earth. even though is not true that someday earth will be lost. here's the idea there is no permanent in this world. you have house and you know someday that its gonna be old but if you know how to clean and you are doing the maintenance it would stay longer. same with the earth. the only difference we can buy a house we can transfer if we want. but is there any other earth?
bscs2a 3 years ago
OMG TRIPODS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
mg2sna 3 years ago
wether you believe it is man made or not, it is happening, and in 50 years some countries will be below sea level, real questions is:
Are we going to attempt to stop this?
Norphax 3 years ago
the majority of people will say they want to, but still drive their 13mpg suvs around. that and oil and car company lobbyists preventing helpful bills from passing.
attempt-yes, accomplish any realistically helpful goals-no.
i also think that saying that glo. war. isn't our fault is a good excuse not to do anything to change our unnatural(more like removed completely from nature)lifestyles. my two cents.
10m19l92o 3 years ago
is there any solid proof or is it just theory about this whole global warming...the arctic is losing ice while he antarctic is gaining ice at an unprecedented rate. sea levels are not rising...every hear of the urban heat sink phenomenon...look into it. global warming isnt cold hard fact...
caper1243 3 years ago
I hate her fucking voice.
rawrrawrrawr232111 3 years ago
nuuuuuuuuuuu! global warming !go away!
Sameoldjo 3 years ago
granted, the sun does melt the top layer of glaciers every year, but its getting much worse. global warming is no myth, its completely due to pollution and human emmissions. polar bears are dying now that every summer is getting worse and taking their hunting habitat away before hibernation. something should be done.
ManifestPanda 3 years ago
Kill humanity? naah, wouldn't change a thing. We let all of this into motion and we can't stop it.
JakeTiDe 3 years ago
you are typical... polar bears? trying to get to the beary side of my heart!!!?? global warming is bull!!!!! if you listen to scientists then you would hear that a moose produces more carbon monoxide gas in a day than a car does in a year.
SRZsmack 3 years ago
i know for a fact that thats not true, animals only produce about a percent of the greenhouse gases that humans do with fossil fuels. and the fact that there are 6,000,000,000 people in this world that have a car, have been in one, or want one makes it worse. and thats only civilian pollution, not to mention the mass companies that release pollution. i guess by your theory the kyoto protocol is meaningless and the depleting animal habitats are just bull. ... ignorance.
ManifestPanda 3 years ago
dont you hate it when people dont believe in global warming or think it is animals.
Maximusdragon 3 years ago
it pretty much is bullshit saying that it's our fault that it is happening. it isn't ours, the world was a ball of ice and it started melting through the middle and spreading up and down to show the world as it is
Gahgajgak 3 years ago
What's to hate - that people are using their heads and will no longer believe what they see on television just because it's on television?
It hasn't been getting warmer where I live. It snowed in Canada two days ago. We're still in OCTOBER!! Where's the warming? Open your eyes and observe things for yourself. Don't believe things just because it's coming from the mainstream media.
jagiar 3 years ago
"We're still in OCTOBER" - I meant when it snowed.
jagiar 3 years ago
You obviously don't understand how climate change works and using your personal observations to disprove it is analogous to saying that smoking doesn't cause cancer because you don't know anyone who smokes and has cancer. We can agree that winter in Canada sucks, but it's supposed to be 10 degrees above normal the next few days. Hmmm... maybe you'll change you're mind then.
sollyjim 3 years ago
You're right - I don't know shit about climate change. And the reason I don't know is because the effects are not obvious. Otherwise if they were obvious then the science would be solid - which it obviously isn't.
What I do know is a little about statistics. And I know ALOT of smokers (I am one). In fact I live in a country of smokers and you know what? The rate of cnacer is no higher here than in any other country.
jagiar 3 years ago
Now if the rate here was higher I might say to myself "hey, there may just be a link between smoking and cancer". But I WOULD NOT just believe the link because the media tells me there is. That's what science is for. First you hypothesize a link, then you isolate the external variables that could affect your study, then you observe and then you make a conclusion. It's called "the scientific method" - which obviously isn't being used in this realm.
jagiar 3 years ago
Fair enough. I don't think the effects of climate change are as dire as the "media" make them out to be either but scientific data has shown that the global climate is changing. I'm not even saying it's man-made, just that I've seen enough scientific data to know that something is going on. I can understand you're point of view though... from one canuck smoker to another :Y
sollyjim 3 years ago
I was born in CDA but no longer reside there.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying we shouldn't "clean up our act" (sorry). I just wouldn't want to see the whole thing get manipulated so that the govt's of the world can have a pretext for alterior motives.
I just find it strange that the affects of "climate change" are being pushed as being 'dire' yet I've yet to see any affects here (in Europe) nor in Canada when I lived there. So why are the supposed affects so drastic in remote places?
jagiar 3 years ago
I would like to get off the use of oil (I think we're going to be forced to eventually - it can't last forever). But I certainly do not think carbon dioxcide is a pollutant and I certainly would not like to see the citizens of nations be taxed for breathing.
jagiar 3 years ago
Well the affects of global warming are obvious, maybe not where you live.
And smoking is believed to helping global warming decrease actually, this is because the cigarette smoke is white, which reflects the rays.
Maximusdragon 3 years ago
so i guess we should just go down the street and buy some cancer sticks huh? stupid idiots that smoke have no idea of the damage it does to you later in life.
arkabamaboy 3 years ago 3
What are you - 12 years old? If you don't smoke how do you know what it does to you? My grandfather, A life-long smoker died at the age of 82. Until the age of 80 he was still working construction. My Grandmother, who lived with a family of smokers is still alive at 81. What do you know about the science of smoking and health/cancer? I suspect only what you hear in the media and not much else.
jagiar 3 years ago
who the hell...allows an 80 year old man...work in construction? and you call others blue-eyed for believing what they hear. hypocrite.
ALSO, the point of "smoking is bad for you" isn't that you WILL get cancer and die. but that you CAN. I'm positive that there are looots of people who would counter your story with how they had to care for and look after their mother for several years who was dying in lung-cancer.
the point is: it's a risk, it's dumb to take it because it's your life.
Adkit2 3 years ago 2
It was his choice. It was his hobby. What was I to do hold a gun to his head and stop him? What are you, some type of fascist?
Also, if you hold the same type of reasoning to the science of "climate change" as you do to the smoking-cancer link then we are all in trouble.
jagiar 3 years ago
also, this video is about glaciers, why are you people talking about smoking? x.x
Adkit2 3 years ago
hypocrite. you're the one talking about smokeing.
buttdread 3 years ago
yes we do and I love it!!!
naxalite 3 years ago
Thats my point. Why ISN'T it obvious where I live. Where the SUV's are? Where indusrty is? Why are the affects ALWAYS seen where the air should be the cleanest - like in the artic? How is it possible that the polution we make here never seems to affect our climate but affects the climate some remote place on earth?
Come on people, use your brain. Stop believing the media hype.
jagiar 3 years ago
If you are smokeing and dont know the effects, then you shouldn't be smokeing....but, seriously...who doesn't know the effects of smokeing now n' days?!?!
buttdread 3 years ago
What's truly lame about serious lifetime smokers is that their faces look like old skanky leather gloves.
woebog 3 years ago
1st, spell smoking correctly, then go on your tirade...
MHeardOnBass 2 years ago
i'll smokeing a cigarate one thas remarcs!
buttdread 2 years ago
termites do more damage than us : ) true story and they greenhouse gas thats having most effect is water vapour and not carbon emissions
aliv101010 3 years ago
No one is saying that we should not reduce our use of 'fossil' fuels (you really believe that oil comes from dinasaurs??). What they are saying is let's not use the politics of fear to propogate an agenda that has alterior motives. People who believe in the fear factor are the ignorant ones.
And the reduction of animal habitats has far more to do with urban sprawl - the incursion into their habitants by ours and not "climate change".
jagiar 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
who needs ice anyways
cshcrazy 3 years ago
Isn't what just happened perfectly normal??
PositiveChillout 3 years ago 4
that it happens - yes.but the retreat of the glaciers over the last 50 years occurs at a velocity never observed before in history.
charms2 3 years ago 8
@charms2 yeah right - who observed glacier retreat in the preceeding 50 or 100 years? It is only the last 10 or 20 years that accurate data is taken.
oomblikkies 1 year ago
@oomblikkies 1. your statement is factually incorrect 2. a photograph is all you need to reconstruct the size of a glacier 100 years ago. of course, that is not as exact as a measurement: but by far exact enough to give you an assesssment.
charms2 1 year ago
@charms2 how can you reconstruct the size of an old glacier from a recent photo? How do you know if the extrapolation is linear, logarithmic, quadratic, etc. etc.
oomblikkies 1 year ago
@oomblikkies You can easily messure the retreat many years ago by looking at vegetation around the glacier. A glacier moving forward will also push a wall of rocks in front of it, creating a morain when it starts retreating. These morains and geological conditions around them will also tell a great deal about the movement of the glacier several hundred years ago.
greeeeh 1 year ago
@greeeeh Okay, let us assume you are right. What does this tell us? That Greenland is returning to the state when the Vikings farmed there. Anything special about that? No - earth does go through these warmer and colder climatic periods.
oomblikkies 1 year ago
@oomblikkies They currently do farm on Greenland. Greenland was named Greenland by Eric the Red because he was hoping people would be eager to go there because of the name. The settlement, however, did nto last long because of harsh conditions. You should study up on this stuff before making statements like above.
WaxItYourself 1 year ago
@WaxItYourself Yes, that is the popular claim by alarmists, but science has a different story. Carbon dating of organic residues found in todays glaciers shows that large parts of Greenland was indeed habitable in the medieval period.
oomblikkies 1 year ago
@oomblikkies Notice I said 'the settlement did not last long due to the harsh conditions'. Greenland is as warm today as it was back then. Greenland is still habitable and farming is currently done on Greenland. Of course this has nothing to do with the reality or non-reality of anthropogenic global warming which is what your term 'alarmists' implies. If you want to talk about science you can start by looking up the greenhouse effect.
WaxItYourself 1 year ago
@WaxItYourself Ha, ha - you want me to read about the greenhouse effect. Perhaps you should have a look at inrared absorption spectra of CO2 and water, the equilibrium between H2O and CO2, hydrogen bonding in H2O, latent heat of H2O, dispersion of uv- and IR-rays by clouds, limitations in the models used for climate prediction, toxicity of CO2, etc. Have a nice Xmas.
oomblikkies 1 year ago
@oomblikkies Ahh, the old 14.5/15 micrometers argument and a bunch of other old arguments including the 'hotspot' and cloud dimming. Now maybe you can explain to me what the medieval warm period has to do with todays warming. It's well known the this period fell in the Medieval Maximum and solar input was a major contributing factor.
WaxItYourself 1 year ago
@charms2 "Observed in History" Sadly, Humanity hasnt been monitoring the worlds ice for very long. The only time it got recorded before the late 1800's is when something HUGE and noticable happened. Losing Ice in Antarctica or Far North at a gradual rate, is well; News, but something that could have been going on for thousands of years before we noticed it.
Traimechify 8 months ago
@Traimechify
1. Glaciers have been monitored for 200 +years, ever since the last expansion in 1850. While it is true that most of the original data is fairly unreliable (the "length" of a glacier is not properly defined, the mass is hard to measure), direct observation is by no means the only possibility of exploring the earth climate in the past: measurements of ice cores, tree rings, investigation of strata etc all indict that this is man made
charms2 8 months ago
In crisis?... this is a common occurance at both poles and is normal. Poor attempt at spinning the global warming scare.
sarcoed 3 years ago
Only politicians or politically influenced people (like Penn influenced by libertarians) say what's happening is normal. You won't find a single real scientific journal that says it's normal. Not one.
darfunkelidas 3 years ago
sorry i voted you down, i meant to vote you up :S its an overwhelming result isn't it, based on the scientific method, the probability that every scientific journal would say its not normal... its frustratingly complexing to try to understand why people dont take this as good information and still refute it when hard workers have collected the data... ask the opposition... Have you got anything to show its normal? Where is your information coming from?
jaxford25 3 years ago
They just borrow words from a couple of ex weather broadcasters that have never done any research and they believe them because they are old, they look smart and they tell them what they want to hear. Id tell all of them to go pick up an issue of nature environment, or at least new scientist.
darfunkelidas 3 years ago
worrying... both global warming and the idiots posting here
MagikGimp 3 years ago
yes lots of idiots
faszika 3 years ago
Wow...I never knew glaciers could move and melt in the summer and freeze back up in the winter.
spydergarbler 3 years ago 2
Wow! Ice is melting! That must mean it is entirely made by humans! Nevermind that there was a previous Ice Age, this is totally different!
We better give Al Gore an award of some kind and pray that he will start a multi-billion dollar company that will tax our oxygen and save us from ourselves!
I bet you anything this video makes the hippies cry.That is why I drive an SUV, just to piss off the gay hippies in Boulder.
backwoodsmister 3 years ago
*HiFive*
rapidattack8 3 years ago
i dont give a F i live 1200meter oversea level
CactosS 3 years ago
Nice vid.
LeeAlbrandt 3 years ago
for every action there is a reaction, humans are doing actions that haven't been done before, and hence there will be a certain reaction to it, in this case, most likely causing glaciers to melt
writofmandamus 3 years ago
The sun, during summer, had nothing to do with this?
Divine562 3 years ago
What is the crisis? All I see is a glacier melting in the summertime.
westlock 3 years ago
Looks OK to me!
SpudXXXX 3 years ago 2
Glaciers do this all the time and always have.
prfctday 3 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
eletricfire45 3 years ago
Higher carbon levels aren't necessary a bad thing, its just that many things cannot get used to it fast enough. If global warming was spread out more then we wouldn't have a problem.
miragebird 3 years ago
TRUTH SHARE!! EXPOSE THE CORRUPTION AND FRAUD!!!! Equality, peace and LOVE to all~!~
danoking69 3 years ago 2
good luck cooling down the sun
humans are only responsible for 5% of earths carbon release yearly
and water vapor is a much more potent greenhouse gas
nokilt1 3 years ago
I can sense liberals starting to rally. Guys, we can help but let's be serious, there are many more important things in our world to do for us to put global warming in our number 1 priority.
crazyforvideosdx 3 years ago
I never met a alcoholic who truly kicked the habit for good. Nor a permanent ex-smoker, except the ones who are dead.
Humans won't break their dependance on wasteful living. Whether we cause global warming or its a natural cycle, it will happen nomatter what we lamely attempt to do.
PrivateSlacker 3 years ago 2
Human beings will soon exhausted various resources, this will lead to either better management, or outright bigoted war over what is left. The UK announced an 80% reduction in it's carbon emissions today. If the USA doesn't elect an oil swigging cretin for president in the forthcoming elections, then perhaps we will see similar policy spreading to other places too.
marsCubed 3 years ago 2
dunno its an addiction..as most commonly said..im a smoker..there are limitations too..shit like carbon we can slow that down if its true what they say that we helped in fukni it all up..or its a natural thing ..but we need new cars that produce the same amount of power,the cars might have to be bigger or shrink the battery but im sure some shit like electric could even be safer
whoGotgrapes 3 years ago
global warming is going to suck 4 our kids and grandkids. ah fuck this trying to fix our planet. the kids r goin to think of something
polandone 3 years ago
A mini ice age corrected that.
searella59 3 years ago
personally i don't believe in the whole climate change thing i know theres natural change over time but i don't think humans are contributing to it when a volcano erupts it puts out 10x as much carbon dioxide in the atmosphere than humans have in ten years.
mesowhite1 3 years ago
If volcano eruptions are constant this would indicate that the margins for driving the earth into ice age are pretty slim.
CognosSquare 3 years ago
@CognosSquare We are less able to do something about
this problem because a great deal of energy is
being spent instead getting people on board to
believe a problem exists
ChristopherRDennis 2 months ago
@CognosSquare This is incorrect information - humans emit 100
times CO2 than volcanoes - see the website
skepticalscience. com / volcanoes-and-
global-warming. htm for scientific review of the
matter. It is irresponsible to spread ill-
thought-out ideas like yours that are counter to
scientific knowledge of a very real problem we are
facing.
ChristopherRDennis 2 months ago
Where did you read that from? I was intrigued by your claim, but after some googling, I think that's a myth...
Idler81643 3 years ago
People who want to know how to help and end this bull shitte, check out Zeitgeist: Addendum.
Peace.
XVX for life, R.A.S.H. 'til death.
aquamammal 3 years ago
and how did they measure the temperature?
Idler81643 3 years ago
WE'RE ALL GONNA DIEEEE
HG2013 3 years ago
yay :] i h8 us >:[
Johnhawkes 3 years ago
why the sound?
Are you scientist o SCI FI?
youzurk 3 years ago
It's the "real" sound. Didn't you hear what she sayd? ;)
"The sound you're hearing was produced by converting seismic waves"
Schmogel92 3 years ago
Backstreet Boys have more sciency music than that intro music! CHANGE IT!
comfortablesofa 3 years ago
NEVER
Christophebano 3 years ago
Well - I was exaggerating. But that music is so 8th grade science when the things discussed in these videos actually involve significant graduate level research. I think the music really underplays that. I'm a big believer in the details of things when it comes to presentations ... I think some types of classical music would sound much more appropriate as an opening sound byte.
comfortablesofa 3 years ago
you're overlooking the unimportantance within the video ;P it's fine how it is, it's more like a signature than a '8th grade science' theme, that's how i'd recognise the video's theirs.
Christophebano 3 years ago
I already lauded the content of the show ... I don't follow what you're insinuating by saying I am overlooking the 'unimportance within the video' ... My job is making presentations and I would never put anything as tacky as that music for the kind of profound information that's discussed. The fact that you can recognize it because of the music doesn't mean anything. In the future, a better music byte that played repeatedly would also make you identify this series with that sound byte.
comfortablesofa 3 years ago
glacier is my friend
Ariji86 3 years ago
you can give it a big warm hug
simple11q 3 years ago
:(
Thats quite scary, and sad
minicus 3 years ago
What is scary is the number of commenters that thinks global warming is due to human activities...
Idler81643 3 years ago
typo...
What is scary is the number of commenters that thinks global warming is NOT due to human activities...
Idler81643 3 years ago 5
Well Sarah Palin's said that she doesn't believe its due to human activities and she's apparently an educated potential world leader. Shows how stupid people can be!
Spanky2k 3 years ago 3
Aliens are to blame for global warming!
(sarcasim)
RobeonMew 3 years ago
no sarcasm, TRUE !
wesNYC 3 years ago
Well, what evidence do you have of that? I thought we aliens hid our agenda sufficiently. (more sarcasm)
searella59 3 years ago
Not we aliens- the aliens.
searella59 3 years ago
well i saw one of you pissing all over the ice berg Trump bought form us
(more more sarcasim)
RobeonMew 3 years ago
Was it green? Inquiring minds want to know. ;P
searella59 3 years ago
it was green and blue. also some colors not able to be seen on this planet
RobeonMew 3 years ago
Educated perhaps, highly intelligent, doubtful.
zqueenbean 3 years ago 3
Actually, there is natural climate change and there is change from human activities. Scientists have agreed on the human factor since the 1940s. With all due respect, maybe you could get your facts from scientists and not republican opinion printed in the wall street journal.
zqueenbean 3 years ago 3
zqueenbean, thank you.
I've tried to make this point to so many people. Global climate change due to human activity is not a political debate, it's a scientific debate, and scientists agree that it occurs.
VampireSaviorX 3 years ago
this is actually pretty scary :/
perqa 3 years ago
that sound is soothing ^-^
yeah, i said it.
TheDave 3 years ago
very experimental side of idm, I agree.
morethansalt 3 years ago
"that being said, we shouldn't go crazy with emissions."
- Agreed.
"again, what we need to focus on are other pollutants!"
- Yes, other pollutants as well.
SAsgarters 3 years ago
"in terms of green house gases."
- In terms if greenhouse gases, yes.
"there's an 800yr gap between co2 levels and a rise in temp."
- Nobody is denying that. Fact of the matter is that the CO2 levels also serve to accelerate the increase in temp.
"also, co2 levels were actually higher in the 19th and early 20th centuries."
- Actually, they weren't.
"what we're pumping into the environment is of little consequence to climate change."
- Wrong.
SAsgarters 3 years ago
I hope evil alien overlords from the planet Venus are thawing underneath and will come back to life
WALK AMONG US
DEAR ALIEN OVERLORDS FROM PLANET VENUS
AWAKEN FROM YOUR COLD SLUMBER
polishedrazor 3 years ago 5
polishedrazor: rAmen lol
SurferRosa79 3 years ago
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
AstoundedAtheist 3 years ago
Holy cow, thats some crazy footage.
ogjimkenobi 3 years ago
The sun isn't the only thing fucking us. We are doing enough to make things worse.
SAsgarters 3 years ago
awsome *turns the heat on a little bit more*
SkyValleySpaceCadet 3 years ago 2
Relax, scientists have found that the ice is getting thicker in arctic. You have to have a view of the whole global to realize that this isn't anything out of the norm. Ice melts here and it forms there. Ice forms here and it melts there. On and on...
It's when some grab a story and blow it up and say over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over...
LooseLatitude 3 years ago 2
and i bet the ice was in crisis whe it was melting 10,000+ years ago (and algore was not around to fill his pockets with money)
wargammer2005 3 years ago
whew .. ooo .. is that all it is ... I guess we have nothing to worry about after all.
Tigerpoi51 3 years ago 3
more water for everyone! :D
(and free ice cubes with your drinks)
peterbriers 3 years ago 2
That's pretty scary to be honest.. Global warming, is gonna kill us all!
ManosOfTerra 3 years ago
where's al gore when you need him?
axisrules1 3 years ago