*sigh* i loved this show, shame it got canceled after the second season :( what a shame they had a good thing going, but i guess people cant appreciate good history shows :P
@DragonOfQin, hmm I don´t think so. Roman legions were probably the strongest army of known world. Terracotta Army was good I think but they hadn´t something like tactics or battle formations I guess. Today´s soldiers have almost the same military ranks and why? For example Legat=Colonel, Centurion=Major( maybe captain)
@saiien2 you smoking or what? Dont talk shit. Terracotta Army is in formation. 3-4 Shock Troopers and Crossbow men in front. Halberders/spearmen behind followed by heavy infantry, then chariots then calvary. My god the ignorance..... And you can determine Terracotta army ranks by their armor and headdress. Look it up on google. They have ranks. Generals-Officers-infantry-crossbowmen-prisoners-shock troopers.
@DragonOfQin, I´m not smoking :P Yeah every army had their formation, but I want to say that romans were the first who introduced professional army......in Europe and their military ranks are using today. It is difficult to say who was better in battlefield. The first thing is the age..... Terracotta Army was cca in 3. century B.C. and romans introduced legions in 1. century B.C. and another thing is that each of them was from different parts of the world.
@Damianweibler Alexander was a Macedonian not a Spartan. Helen of Troy was formally Helen of Sparta so the Spartan army did fight at Troy as well as Thermopylae.
What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song..........??????????
Why all this talk about the Greeks? When the Greeks started exploring the mediterranean seas they found a highly advanced civilization in Italy now known as the Etruscans. Rome even had a few Etruscan kings before reforming to a republic.
from what i notice the roman legions dont charge.... they just wait for their enemies to come to them..... so a good tactic to defeat them would be to attack them from far.? plus they dont seem to be that mobile too......in most of the battle videos that i watch.... it's just a bunch of unorganised barbarians runing towards tight formations of roman soldiers... while all the roman soldiers do is to protect themselves with the shield and stab when their enemies came close...
@therockana i believe your missing major factors. the romans had some of the best cavalry of the time, they fought enemies with ideas similar to your own, the scythian horde horse archers. chariots and bows defeated by mobility. tower shields are easy to block arrows with and the idea of no center line is preposterous, the roman army would simply maneuver and encircle.this is just a movie. barbarians didn't fight like that either.
@EnjoiThrowdown yeah that's what i thought... i mean. come on.. who are so stupid right? haha... these movies.....wish they were more realistic and historically accurate.... cause lot of people actually do get their idea of history through these movies......
@therockana and since you seem very interested in what, and how these so called "barbarians" where. i highly suggest you also check out the wars in northern germany, there was a major feud going on between the thanes and kings of the north, and the goth tribes of germany, it is also one of the least known struggles people know of, but it truly shaped the barbarian world of northern europe, they where just as advanced as the romans.
@therockana there is many on the punic wars mate, search them. as of the wars in ancient germanium, i have yet to see a documentary, like i said they weren't the big focus like we study romans and grecians.
@EnjoiThrowdown , but now alas,the Germans have been raped by the Russians,then the Americans,now a old lady giving b/j to the Eu,King Richard the lionheart turns in his grave,while 3 million Moslems piss and shit on his dear England,and in Belgium,they sell their daughters to the foreigners,very bad times
@Arakl10 you speak like europe is defeated? i don't get you people. you forget the students of europe you think we don't know? im full norman, my ancestors fought hundreds of years to make europe what it is. you disrespect me by preaching this to me like im not aware of hardships and betrayal from our own elders.
@EnjoiThrowdown , Aha a Norman,a descendant of the Norse men,who couldent hack it with the vikings,so were made either outcasts or jus immegrants to France,UK,aaw youre ancestors were immegrants,get a life dude !
The Romans was Terorists of the past, without the roman agression has we today a other europe with a high level celtic german based civilisation The Romans has nothing invited everithing was they has to build her "empire" is stolen from the Greek and the Celts. Religion, Armor, Wapons, Technologie, Archäologists found in South England regular streets from the year 1000bc in France and Germany big citys from 1000 and 2500bc. Romans? nothing only Thifs and Killers
@Alexx3026 yes your English is bad, but you post an interesting point, yes, the Romans devoted a lot of time to thievery and killing, but all the powers of the time were as bad or worst, and the Romans were extraordinary engineers who built magnificent roads, bridges and water works many of them still standing, as for the Celts and the Germanic tribes they were no gentle druids but murderous savages with a pillager culture, not a high level civilization, so I respectfully disagree with your post
@Alexx3026 ...as for the the "stolen" things this was precisely the main strength of the Romans, they were able to take and adapt the good things of multiple cultures and repel or ignore the bad (on their opinion), we could learn a lot of that attitude, after all we din´t "stole" the Internet from the Americans, we are using it for our benefit, don´t we? :) ....without Rome we surely will be an Islamic planet or an oriental satrapy, the Romans were jerks, but they were brave, very smart jerks :)
Celts had a whole network of roads connecting all the celtic world(romans called them their own LOL) mail used in their republican army was first made by celts,their imperial legions gladium,was a adoption of the hispanic celtic sword......
Rome success is mostly due to the celtic political divisions,many tribes with many wars between them,if celts were united as the italics became under Rome,the romans,would never have been a menace.
@bandolerocubano in a way the greeks conquered rome, culturaly speaking cause the romans borrowed many things from the greeks and took them to a whole new level
@ComradeMing However, Dubs' hypothesis has not found acceptance among modern academics. There is no evidence that these men were Romans, and recent DNA testing of the male inhabitants of Liqian does not support the hypothesis. Newspaper reports in 2010 have claimed DNA tests now confirm "Caucasian origin" for a majority of Liqian residents
This comes from Wiki, though I think I got the legion and eagle part from fiction... sorry.
@ComradeMing Taking up these two strands, Dubs points to a Chinese account by Ban Gu of about "a hundred men" under the command of Zhizhi who fought in a so-called "fish-scale formation" to defend Zhizhi's wooden-palisade fortress against Han forces, in the Battle of Zhizhi in 36 BCE. He claimed that this might have been the Roman testudo formation and that these men, who were captured by the Chinese, founded the village of Liqian (Li-chien) in Yongchang County.
@ComradeMing The historian Homer H. Dubs speculated that Roman prisoners of war who were transferred to the Parthian eastern border might have later clashed with Han troops there. After losing at the battle of Carrhae in 54 BCE, an estimated 10,000 Roman prisoners were displaced by the Parthians to Margiana to man the frontier. About 18 years later the nomadic Xiongnu chief Zhizhi established a state in the nearby Talas valley, near modern day Taraz.
@ComradeMing Thank you very much Sir. I think I read that a Roman legion wound up in China searching for its Eagle? If that's true then it would explain your history.
Impossible to say if the Han would win in battle, the same historian i quoted refrain from giving an opinion on the subject due to impossibility to assert it. To the say that Rome or the Han would win in battle is pointless bittering and have no scientific reasoning behind it therefore i wont cover this ridicolous subject.
@ComradeMing His analyses is for the classi period, i tried to send you the entire analyses but you have friend control.
His analyses is Han China when he concludes that the Roman world was more developed (also he is one of the few western historian to claim that tang china was more developed than the arabs) especially around the second century AD when east Han was already crumbling and Rome was at its peak.
@ComradeMing "Civilizations are seldom superior or inferior to each other in all respects. They are not blocs, but aggregates and distinctions between levels and within levels must be drawn. That said, if an overall judgement has to be made, it is difficult not to conclude that around AD 400 the Roman world was more advanced than the Chinese world
T'ang China: The Rise of the East in World History... SAM adshead
Rome fought several nomads like the Alani, Sarmatians, Huns and others. Parthia in a sense fought like nomads as well, relying heavily with horse archer and their famous Heavy cavalary (at the time, the best in the world).
I am far from certain that Han would win, it is the opinion of most military historian that bows were not a decisive factor on the battlefield especially if the opposing army could counter it. I just refrain from giving an opinion because reaching an answer is almost impossible.
While the Han had sucess against the xiongnu they also were many times defeated by them and the so goes to Rome (even thou Rome won most of their battles against nomads they were also defeated by them)
@iparra393 Just wanted to say (in my point of view) that most of the burocratic, political, military and cultural facts of the acient rome, are still adopted in the modern countries of today, as in the U.S.A. Of course your forefather fought with courage for their freedom, but without the roman empire, we will probably still live in middle age times or even worse. The empire had might collapsed, but the the idealogy still lives in great parts of todays society.
No such thing as pure blooded anything. stop arguing. As for this stupid U.S.A exist because of so and so please put that to rest the U.S.A exist because my country men's forefathers fought bravely for freedom. Certainly Rome is the pinnacle of ancient human advancement.
I know Han cavalary is good but the Parthian cavalary is better especially their heavy cavalary, usually the parthian cataphract was more heavily armoured. Its known that in the three kingdoms China acquired a more heavily armoured cavalary. I know about the Xiognu and you are right their were probably not the Huns (in fact, the theory that they were the huns is not in a very good shape).
@ComradeMing They can call themselves Romans. Why? Simple, we assimilated them, we brought them our culture and thusly had children with their women mixing our bloodline with theirs'. Europe is, in effect, the child of Greco-Roman culture. We only called them barbarians because of their primative tounge which sounded alot like sheep. You're mistaken about us only having barbarians at the end. You do realize that many of the oldest Roman bloodlines are still in existance, we're still here lol
@atnight87 USA exists because of the UK, UK and the western world exists because of ROME :) without rome the world as we see it today would have not existed
@warbossgrotsmasha23 I know. Nowadays too many people forget that our western countries have their cultural bases on roman and greek culture...but, most of all, the USA seems to have a tremendous love for the history of Rome and how they mantained their empire.
@warbossgrotsmasha23 Don't forget the Greeks! Rome exists because of the Greeks, if the Persian empire took Greece there would of been no stopping them.
It is impossible to say... u can't say the rome exist cause of greeks...persian didnt want conquer ita, but greece... however Greeks fought with honor and they saved european culture deafiting persians
@ave92me Exactly, the Greeks saved European culture.. If the Greeks did not do so there may not of been a Rome and the world would not be as we know it today.
@MegansAFox2010 If, if, if. That's the only argument Greeks have. If Grandma had balls, she would be Grandpa. Stop it with the "If" statements. The Romans destroyed Pyrrhus and his Army. Pyrrhus was a cousin of Alexander's. They would have never had a chance against a Roman Legion.
@TKMSeznam12 Yes I know that, I'm just saying that if the Persian's weren't pushed back by the Greeks they may have conquered as far as Rome and Rome may not have risen. I never said Greece was more powerful than Rome, the Romans were superior.. But my point is as stated.
@MegansAFox2010 oh...I dunno...maybe Persia would have pushed..maybe not...who knows..like guessing how many angels dance on the head of a pin...we will never know.
@warbossgrotsmasha23 Without the USA , the UK wouldn't exist. You would have been crushed under Nazi boots. We owe our independence to the French, not to your crumbling fucking Empire.
@EpicTrollBeastMan yeah and france would have been just another uncivilized land without proper roads and many things....rome gave france roman law, architecture, military discipline, civil administration and so on and so on that napoleon bonaparte used to the most extreme to make france a super power, a new rome and he a new caesar
The Chinese had large, highly organized, bureaucratic states before Rome had even ventured out of Latium. That immediately gives them a strategic edge because winning wars is about organization, not weapons.
In terms of battlefield operations themselves, the Chinese had large forces of crossbows when the Romans had mainly melee forces. I'm not saying it's cut and dry but contemporary Chinese armies were definitely capable of defeating a Roman army in battle. The rest depends on specifics.
@xxJasterMereelxx The roman army is historically know for having one of the best organized and most well disciplined armies in history. They had a few formations to stop arrows, as well as crossbows. Not to mention, their superior navy. Roman cavalry was feared by many barbarians and civilized armies. Not to mention the roman roads, which would allow the roman army to move much more quickly then the chines if they invaded.
Also wernt the Chinese reliant on weak iron for armor and weapons?
Wow, what a stupid comment. Stop watching 300, kid.
Ancient Greece? You mean the Greek city states? The Greek city states were weak and never united.
Not even the Macedonian army could face Rome, and they were superior to the ancient Greeks.
The Macedonian army lacks manpower and strength.
China was the "middle kingdom". Even the Roman Empire respected the vastness and cultural superiority of China. China was at it's height during different time periods.
Remember, the Art of War? The Three Kingdoms? China was never "unified at that time". Many different dynasties. They were "Chinese". You really lack history. Warfare isn't about "being cool and 300-like".
It's about lgoistics and mapower. China had wealth and that. Miltiary powress and experience.
Rome couldn't pacify the Northern barbarians. Too many barbarians, outnumbered their legions.
Guess how many people were in China? Even more people, even more training/weapons.
I understand that you think Chinese people are weak and pathetic.
Im talking from a historical and logical sense. I repsect Roman history more, but stating blatant and baseless statements like yours offends me. It offends the academic integrity of history.
Weak iron and armour? I bet you got that theory from the modern reputation of "Chinese manufacturing".
The Chinese had large, highly organized, bureaucratic states before Rome had even ventured out of Latium. That immediately gives them a strategic edge because winning wars is about organization, not weapons.
In terms of battlefield operations themselves, the Chinese had large forces of crossbows when the Romans had mainly melee forces. I'm not saying it's cut and dry but contemporary Chinese armies were definitely capable of defeating a Roman army in battle.
Superior navy? LOL Roman Roads? LOL Yeah to can extend roads to China... IDIOT. Crossbows? Who invented them? Canons? Who invented them? Spartans were disciplined, they got raped by Thebans, Macedonians and eventually Romans.... Your whole arguement is invalid.
@ThebanPhalanx This argument started with some one saying China could rape Rome. That leads me to believe that China would be the attackers, that's where the Roman roads come into play. Also China would never have heard of Rome until she was at her height, do simply to distance. So for China to invade they would have to march a long distance and have an incredibly long supply line. As Sun Tzu says, it is not wise to stretch a line that far. And an army of billions can not live off the land.
@ThebanPhalanx Also the question comes down to what technology do the Chinese have? And would they bring a lot of siege equipment or food? Remember to load a supply wagon, something has to pull it and that something has to eat. So to move a supply line from China to Rome you not only have to feed the men but the pack animals. Which means the pack animals have to carry more food. This would mean an attacking Chinese army would be moving only a few miles a day if they brought the numbers.
@ThebanPhalanx Lastly, I am ignorant of Chinese history as they simply never interested me. Though xxJasterMereelxx has changed that. However I think in a war were longestics will play heavily the Romans will win simply because the Chinese are to big to move anywhere quickly. Speed, Discipline, knowledge of the territory, native mercenaries and the simple ability to conquer will pull Rome through, though with high losses.
What did the Chinese conquer? Besides themselves? Enlighten me
@ThebanPhalanx Its very valid, you just don't like the fact you lost the whole arguement and making up shit xD the Spartans lost battles before their military civilization came to sight. After which, no one would challange them. And Rome along with Macedonia, didn't challange Sparta to open war xD they aren't stupid like you man, they negotiated with them.
@KukSoolKarl First, yes, Roman power relied very much on the discipline and organization of their armies, but this has to be considered relative to who they fought. Every time the Romans fought other disciplined, organized armies they often lost until the manpower reserves of Italy could be brought to bear. The Chinese were at least as organized as those enemies but beat Italy in manpower. All the advantages that Rome enjoyed don't apply in a confrontation with contemporary Chinese civilization.
@xxJasterMereelxx I am not sure about manpower. At their respective zenith the two empires had more or less the same population: 80 millions. Moreover, the best reserves not necessairly came from Italy: the spanish or narbonensis legions were as good.
@KukSoolKarl Most of those arrow defense techniques were only useful during sieges. I'm sure you're referring to the testudo formation, which would have been run down by cavalry if they had tried it in the field. Which explains why they didn't. As I said, it's not cut and dry; in battle itself it could go either way depending on specifics. I only favor the Chinese overall because of strategic considerations (like manpower, and mass production and interchangeability of crossbow parts)
@xxJasterMereelxx Your argument has peeked my interest in the study of Chinese history.
When I referred to arrow defense, I was thinking more of their anty-calvery formation. A line of shields with another line higher up, normal with gaps for spears. As from my understanding of Chinese martial arts, (my current only understanding of Chinese military) did they have weak iron? Isn't that why they have that swords that's floppy, or the swords that are really heavy? Also, what was their armor like?
@KukSoolKarl That formation you mentioned *is* testudo, which is not for anti-cavalry (and the Romans didn't use spears, they used javelins). Chinese soldiers of the period would have used mainly polearms like the Ge or Ji, which has been (imprecisely) translated as "halberd". When the Chinese adopted iron weapons, it was of approximately the same quality as Roman iron weapons of the period. There is no significant technological difference (except crossbows). The difference is method.
In theory a confrontation between Rome and Han China would be nearly impossible to predict. The chinese usually fielded larger armies than that of Rome mainly because Han china military tradition was known for conscription and although a Roman top gear matched with a Han top gear would be roughly of the same quality, most historinas agree that Rome would on average better gear.
Han cavalary is good but not nearly as good as that of the middle east (like that of Persia, Armenia and Anatolia) which in turns means the Romans had easy acess to top notch cavalary (on a side note Hadrian was the first Roman emperor to form a permanent catafractarii unit). Chinese cavalary got better in the three kingdoms period (soon after the Han china).
@ThebanPhalanx > with the fact three rows of the spears would be out and ready for them. Then, once the spears were useless, the Greeks would have used their shortswords. Which, once the Chinese got close, the Greeks would have slaughtered them. The Spartan forces alone could have slaughtered many of the Chinese forces. So if the Romans could have defeated the Greeks as they did, China would have zero chances against them. Only Sun Tzu has my respect, because he alone could have won it.
@ArcTrooper673 And, if the Spartan and Greeks could have had another Thermopylae, with the pass guarded this time, then then China could have emptied its armies and been slaughtered.
One interesting fact is Rome conjured Greece but did not fight Sparta. Not even Alexander the Great messed with Sparta. In fact if I remember my resurch paper right Rome used Spartan forces to defend one of her northern borders. Until Rome fell that border didn't fall. China couldn't pare anyone but themselves.
@KukSoolKarl Exactly, That guy who claims Rome wasn't a super power... Is a big time idiot, they really need to read up. Sparta alone could have defeated the Chinese because of one majore factor. THEY WEREN'T SOLDIERS. Back then, Chinese soldiers were farmers given weapons and then trained for a month or two for battle. Spartans were training since they were seven years old. Pid the two together, Sparta would have came out on top.
@ThebanPhalanx I just want to get my two cents worth in the I'll shut up. At its height Rome was nearly twice as large as china. And china at its strongest got kicked out of Korea. (facts are a little fuzzy about the Korean thing.) Also Chinese armies had size but from what I remembered lacked the discipline of a roman legion. It should also be noted that Barbarians couldn't touch Rome in its golden age. It wasn't until the decline of Rome and all her political troubles that Rome got raped.
@ThebanPhalanx rome raped by barbarians?...ahahahahah rome falled for internal crisis....barbarians invasions were a consequence of the fall of the empire....roman empire was the most durable of the history....rome ruled the world for 1000 years..compared to the roman the chinese empire was shit.....you study history....
@ThebanPhalanx Dude, China would have been raped. Hell, the forces from Ancient Greece could have destroyed the Chinese forces. One major reason, superior fighting skills and tactics. Not to mention the fact they wore bronze armor and used a shield that was half their size and could easily defended them from anything the Chinese threw at them. Last but not least, the Greek Weapons. They used a 8 foot spear, in which three rows of them would have impaled most of the Chinese forces>
In the time of Rome, China was united under one banner. Had it been war between Rome and China the result would be unclear. Therefore I do not agree with what the uploader has written in the description bar.
@KumarZimmerman08 romans didn't believe in any modern gods. plus modern europeans are mainly originally from asia. but yeah, i love europe and i want to see europe proud and not drowning in the moral relativism and a sense of collective european guilt that is being foisted upon us for ideological reasons.
@Bolshevik327 The song would be better if it was apart of a war montage covering all of military history. Ancient, Romans, Napoleonic, WW1/WW2, etc. etc. It would just fit better, not just the Romans.
What is the song?
One more thing: I type in Roman Legion to learn about their army recruitment and the soldiers... but these keep coming up.
Not that I mind, since these are great, but are there any documentaries on the average Roman soldier and how he is inducted into a Legion?
fl333r 6 hours ago
odio le americanate dimmerda sull antica roma .
astengore 1 day ago
super bien réalisé jaime
sehusson 1 day ago
Which movie is at 2.32?? Rome of HBO??
Templar572 4 days ago
@Templar572 yes, it was one of the last episodes of the series 2 i believe
Mersadlpool 2 days ago
ADVAAAANCE
taiko729 5 days ago
GLI ITALIANI NON DIMENTICANO I GRECI E LA GRECIA.
Garospace 1 week ago
*sigh* i loved this show, shame it got canceled after the second season :( what a shame they had a good thing going, but i guess people cant appreciate good history shows :P
broncosfan02 1 week ago
this is how the battles went. opponent died with trying their hardest romans walked by and slayed everybody
MySecretWeapon77 3 weeks ago
Terracotta Army would make these fools cry for mercy.
DragonOfQin 2 months ago
@DragonOfQin, hmm I don´t think so. Roman legions were probably the strongest army of known world. Terracotta Army was good I think but they hadn´t something like tactics or battle formations I guess. Today´s soldiers have almost the same military ranks and why? For example Legat=Colonel, Centurion=Major( maybe captain)
saiien2 1 month ago
@saiien2 you smoking or what? Dont talk shit. Terracotta Army is in formation. 3-4 Shock Troopers and Crossbow men in front. Halberders/spearmen behind followed by heavy infantry, then chariots then calvary. My god the ignorance..... And you can determine Terracotta army ranks by their armor and headdress. Look it up on google. They have ranks. Generals-Officers-infantry-crossbowmen-prisoners-shock troopers.
DragonOfQin 1 month ago
@DragonOfQin, I´m not smoking :P Yeah every army had their formation, but I want to say that romans were the first who introduced professional army......in Europe and their military ranks are using today. It is difficult to say who was better in battlefield. The first thing is the age..... Terracotta Army was cca in 3. century B.C. and romans introduced legions in 1. century B.C. and another thing is that each of them was from different parts of the world.
saiien2 1 month ago
@saiien2 Yeah there is nothing much to say about it then. Peace.
DragonOfQin 1 month ago
@saiien2 Sparta had a professional Army in Europe before Rome was founded.
KukSoolKarl 2 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
@KukSoolKarl yeah, but they never really did much with it except for Alexander, the Romans conquered most of europe and north africa
Damianweibler 1 week ago
@Damianweibler Alexander was a Macedonian not a Spartan. Helen of Troy was formally Helen of Sparta so the Spartan army did fight at Troy as well as Thermopylae.
KukSoolKarl 1 week ago
Roman Empaire......the one proud of Italy!!!!!!!
Emig85 2 months ago
best part: 2:32-2:47
allforable 2 months ago
What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song What's the song..........??????????
biliant1 2 months ago
@biliant1 Europa by Globus
Cheers
MDK775 2 months ago
what movie is that at the start.?
iparra393 2 months ago
Why all this talk about the Greeks? When the Greeks started exploring the mediterranean seas they found a highly advanced civilization in Italy now known as the Etruscans. Rome even had a few Etruscan kings before reforming to a republic.
Cyrudan 2 months ago
from what i notice the roman legions dont charge.... they just wait for their enemies to come to them..... so a good tactic to defeat them would be to attack them from far.? plus they dont seem to be that mobile too......in most of the battle videos that i watch.... it's just a bunch of unorganised barbarians runing towards tight formations of roman soldiers... while all the roman soldiers do is to protect themselves with the shield and stab when their enemies came close...
therockana 2 months ago
@therockana i believe your missing major factors. the romans had some of the best cavalry of the time, they fought enemies with ideas similar to your own, the scythian horde horse archers. chariots and bows defeated by mobility. tower shields are easy to block arrows with and the idea of no center line is preposterous, the roman army would simply maneuver and encircle.this is just a movie. barbarians didn't fight like that either.
EnjoiThrowdown 2 months ago
@EnjoiThrowdown yeah that's what i thought... i mean. come on.. who are so stupid right? haha... these movies.....wish they were more realistic and historically accurate.... cause lot of people actually do get their idea of history through these movies......
therockana 2 months ago
@therockana read into the punic wars, carthage actually defeated the romans bitterly a few times, but lost the war.
if it is cold realism your looking for, the scientific approach always wins over the entertainment.
EnjoiThrowdown 2 months ago
@therockana and since you seem very interested in what, and how these so called "barbarians" where. i highly suggest you also check out the wars in northern germany, there was a major feud going on between the thanes and kings of the north, and the goth tribes of germany, it is also one of the least known struggles people know of, but it truly shaped the barbarian world of northern europe, they where just as advanced as the romans.
EnjoiThrowdown 2 months ago
@EnjoiThrowdown any suggestion? documentaries etc?
therockana 2 months ago
@therockana there is many on the punic wars mate, search them. as of the wars in ancient germanium, i have yet to see a documentary, like i said they weren't the big focus like we study romans and grecians.
EnjoiThrowdown 2 months ago
@EnjoiThrowdown yeah just watched a documentary on the punic war... the one alexander siddiq acted as hannibal..... was interesting..
therockana 2 months ago
@EnjoiThrowdown , but now alas,the Germans have been raped by the Russians,then the Americans,now a old lady giving b/j to the Eu,King Richard the lionheart turns in his grave,while 3 million Moslems piss and shit on his dear England,and in Belgium,they sell their daughters to the foreigners,very bad times
Arakl10 2 months ago
@Arakl10 you speak like europe is defeated? i don't get you people. you forget the students of europe you think we don't know? im full norman, my ancestors fought hundreds of years to make europe what it is. you disrespect me by preaching this to me like im not aware of hardships and betrayal from our own elders.
EnjoiThrowdown 2 months ago
@EnjoiThrowdown , Aha a Norman,a descendant of the Norse men,who couldent hack it with the vikings,so were made either outcasts or jus immegrants to France,UK,aaw youre ancestors were immegrants,get a life dude !
Arakl10 2 months ago
what is this movie
name
pubiswa 2 months ago
SPQR!!! invictus roma !! Ave Caesar!!
kisame21 2 months ago
"If you need to urinate,now is the time......(not in battle)"
What a classic.
StellandBlood 3 months ago 9
Shit music killed the cat
FoGGeRdk 3 months ago
the gods favor only the strong!
geofrry1121 3 months ago
i am Colombian/mexican and i know for a fact i have Spanish and roman decent.
geofrry1121 3 months ago
@geofrry1121 Not to be annoying, but almost everybody from Europa has got roman blood.
ViccardXViccc 3 months ago
@ViccardXViccc Talk for your self. Almost everybody from Europe are from barbarian states.
Croats (including me), Russians, Slovenians, Ukraines and others are Slavs.
Franks, Engilh mans, Germans... Was Germanic tribes. But meaby Greeks, they are Bizantynes
with 10% Turkish population.
allforable 3 months ago
@allforable I'm from Germanic distance but I'm sure I've got some Roman blood in me somewhere! ^^
ViccardXViccc 3 months ago
@ViccardXViccc Im sure most people in the western world do
cwood4ever 3 months ago
@cwood4ever that was I was trying to say ^^
ViccardXViccc 3 months ago
As first Sorry for my bad English
The Romans was Terorists of the past, without the roman agression has we today a other europe with a high level celtic german based civilisation The Romans has nothing invited everithing was they has to build her "empire" is stolen from the Greek and the Celts. Religion, Armor, Wapons, Technologie, Archäologists found in South England regular streets from the year 1000bc in France and Germany big citys from 1000 and 2500bc. Romans? nothing only Thifs and Killers
Alexx3026 3 months ago
@Alexx3026 yes your English is bad, but you post an interesting point, yes, the Romans devoted a lot of time to thievery and killing, but all the powers of the time were as bad or worst, and the Romans were extraordinary engineers who built magnificent roads, bridges and water works many of them still standing, as for the Celts and the Germanic tribes they were no gentle druids but murderous savages with a pillager culture, not a high level civilization, so I respectfully disagree with your post
AkiraBrahe 3 months ago
@Alexx3026 ...as for the the "stolen" things this was precisely the main strength of the Romans, they were able to take and adapt the good things of multiple cultures and repel or ignore the bad (on their opinion), we could learn a lot of that attitude, after all we din´t "stole" the Internet from the Americans, we are using it for our benefit, don´t we? :) ....without Rome we surely will be an Islamic planet or an oriental satrapy, the Romans were jerks, but they were brave, very smart jerks :)
AkiraBrahe 3 months ago
@Alexx3026
Yes,they were great bastards.
Celts had a whole network of roads connecting all the celtic world(romans called them their own LOL) mail used in their republican army was first made by celts,their imperial legions gladium,was a adoption of the hispanic celtic sword......
Rome success is mostly due to the celtic political divisions,many tribes with many wars between them,if celts were united as the italics became under Rome,the romans,would never have been a menace.
StellandBlood 3 months ago
Name of this film ?
ivanTebrax 3 months ago
@bandolerocubano in a way the greeks conquered rome, culturaly speaking cause the romans borrowed many things from the greeks and took them to a whole new level
warbossgrotsmasha23 3 months ago
And dont forget Adam, Eva and Noah, witout them we all wouldn't be here
amynase 3 months ago
1:07- 1:18 Romans should go in Testudo formation.
allforable 3 months ago
LEGION PATRIA NOSTRA
SSadolfhitlerSS 3 months ago
Song name?
MrSilverAlex 3 months ago
HAIL ROMA !
StirpeRomana 3 months ago
What show is this from?
Hakkapell 3 months ago
@ComradeMing However, Dubs' hypothesis has not found acceptance among modern academics. There is no evidence that these men were Romans, and recent DNA testing of the male inhabitants of Liqian does not support the hypothesis. Newspaper reports in 2010 have claimed DNA tests now confirm "Caucasian origin" for a majority of Liqian residents
This comes from Wiki, though I think I got the legion and eagle part from fiction... sorry.
KukSoolKarl 3 months ago
@ComradeMing Taking up these two strands, Dubs points to a Chinese account by Ban Gu of about "a hundred men" under the command of Zhizhi who fought in a so-called "fish-scale formation" to defend Zhizhi's wooden-palisade fortress against Han forces, in the Battle of Zhizhi in 36 BCE. He claimed that this might have been the Roman testudo formation and that these men, who were captured by the Chinese, founded the village of Liqian (Li-chien) in Yongchang County.
KukSoolKarl 3 months ago
@ComradeMing The historian Homer H. Dubs speculated that Roman prisoners of war who were transferred to the Parthian eastern border might have later clashed with Han troops there. After losing at the battle of Carrhae in 54 BCE, an estimated 10,000 Roman prisoners were displaced by the Parthians to Margiana to man the frontier. About 18 years later the nomadic Xiongnu chief Zhizhi established a state in the nearby Talas valley, near modern day Taraz.
KukSoolKarl 3 months ago
@ComradeMing Not smoking anything, just reporting what I read.
KukSoolKarl 3 months ago
THIS IS THE BEST DAMN ARMY EVER
MadMax74656 3 months ago
@ComradeMing Thank you very much Sir. I think I read that a Roman legion wound up in China searching for its Eagle? If that's true then it would explain your history.
Thank you for the history. :)
KukSoolKarl 3 months ago
@ComradeMing
I do agree that there are many variables. It very much depends on the army compisitoon as well.
WolfganggAmadeus 3 months ago
Impossible to say if the Han would win in battle, the same historian i quoted refrain from giving an opinion on the subject due to impossibility to assert it. To the say that Rome or the Han would win in battle is pointless bittering and have no scientific reasoning behind it therefore i wont cover this ridicolous subject.
WolfganggAmadeus 3 months ago
@ComradeMing His analyses is for the classi period, i tried to send you the entire analyses but you have friend control.
His analyses is Han China when he concludes that the Roman world was more developed (also he is one of the few western historian to claim that tang china was more developed than the arabs) especially around the second century AD when east Han was already crumbling and Rome was at its peak.
WolfganggAmadeus 3 months ago
@ComradeMing "Civilizations are seldom superior or inferior to each other in all respects. They are not blocs, but aggregates and distinctions between levels and within levels must be drawn. That said, if an overall judgement has to be made, it is difficult not to conclude that around AD 400 the Roman world was more advanced than the Chinese world
T'ang China: The Rise of the East in World History... SAM adshead
WolfganggAmadeus 3 months ago
@ComradeMing
I know the Hans eventually topped the xiongnu.
WolfganggAmadeus 3 months ago
@ComradeMing
Rome fought several nomads like the Alani, Sarmatians, Huns and others. Parthia in a sense fought like nomads as well, relying heavily with horse archer and their famous Heavy cavalary (at the time, the best in the world).
WolfganggAmadeus 3 months ago
@ComradeMing
I am far from certain that Han would win, it is the opinion of most military historian that bows were not a decisive factor on the battlefield especially if the opposing army could counter it. I just refrain from giving an opinion because reaching an answer is almost impossible.
While the Han had sucess against the xiongnu they also were many times defeated by them and the so goes to Rome (even thou Rome won most of their battles against nomads they were also defeated by them)
WolfganggAmadeus 3 months ago
@iparra393 Just wanted to say (in my point of view) that most of the burocratic, political, military and cultural facts of the acient rome, are still adopted in the modern countries of today, as in the U.S.A. Of course your forefather fought with courage for their freedom, but without the roman empire, we will probably still live in middle age times or even worse. The empire had might collapsed, but the the idealogy still lives in great parts of todays society.
MrFed93 3 months ago
Comment removed
MrFed93 3 months ago
No such thing as pure blooded anything. stop arguing. As for this stupid U.S.A exist because of so and so please put that to rest the U.S.A exist because my country men's forefathers fought bravely for freedom. Certainly Rome is the pinnacle of ancient human advancement.
iparra393 3 months ago
@ComradeMing
I know Han cavalary is good but the Parthian cavalary is better especially their heavy cavalary, usually the parthian cataphract was more heavily armoured. Its known that in the three kingdoms China acquired a more heavily armoured cavalary. I know about the Xiognu and you are right their were probably not the Huns (in fact, the theory that they were the huns is not in a very good shape).
Anyway, i am fan of China especially Tang China.
WolfganggAmadeus 3 months ago
@ComradeMing They can call themselves Romans. Why? Simple, we assimilated them, we brought them our culture and thusly had children with their women mixing our bloodline with theirs'. Europe is, in effect, the child of Greco-Roman culture. We only called them barbarians because of their primative tounge which sounded alot like sheep. You're mistaken about us only having barbarians at the end. You do realize that many of the oldest Roman bloodlines are still in existance, we're still here lol
Praetorian107 3 months ago
@ComradeMing lol fish? Testudo means tortoise or turtle ; describing the overlapping shields used to protect the cohort from missle attacks.
Praetorian107 3 months ago
witch movie is this
milosduda94 3 months ago
@milosduda94 rome tv series
HugoTheGringo 3 months ago
good but with movies are these??
theyassinforever 3 months ago
@theyassinforever hbo rome, BBC's hannibal, and something else from bbc i dont remember
williamxiji 3 months ago
@williamxiji and Rome: rise and fall of an empire
williamxiji 3 months ago
what film is?
enaud1984 3 months ago
Without Rome, the USA wouldn't even exist - they're just playing the part...
Viva Roma! Viva l'Italia!
Aspice agedum hanc frequentiam, cui vix urbis immensae tecta sufficiunt
atnight87 3 months ago
@atnight87 USA exists because of the UK, UK and the western world exists because of ROME :) without rome the world as we see it today would have not existed
warbossgrotsmasha23 3 months ago 34
@warbossgrotsmasha23 I know. Nowadays too many people forget that our western countries have their cultural bases on roman and greek culture...but, most of all, the USA seems to have a tremendous love for the history of Rome and how they mantained their empire.
atnight87 3 months ago
@warbossgrotsmasha23 Don't forget the Greeks! Rome exists because of the Greeks, if the Persian empire took Greece there would of been no stopping them.
MegansAFox2010 3 months ago 6
@MegansAFox2010
It is impossible to say... u can't say the rome exist cause of greeks...persian didnt want conquer ita, but greece... however Greeks fought with honor and they saved european culture deafiting persians
ave92me 2 months ago
@ave92me Exactly, the Greeks saved European culture.. If the Greeks did not do so there may not of been a Rome and the world would not be as we know it today.
MegansAFox2010 2 months ago
@MegansAFox2010 If, if, if. That's the only argument Greeks have. If Grandma had balls, she would be Grandpa. Stop it with the "If" statements. The Romans destroyed Pyrrhus and his Army. Pyrrhus was a cousin of Alexander's. They would have never had a chance against a Roman Legion.
TKMSeznam12 2 months ago
@TKMSeznam12 Yes I know that, I'm just saying that if the Persian's weren't pushed back by the Greeks they may have conquered as far as Rome and Rome may not have risen. I never said Greece was more powerful than Rome, the Romans were superior.. But my point is as stated.
MegansAFox2010 2 months ago
@MegansAFox2010 oh...I dunno...maybe Persia would have pushed..maybe not...who knows..like guessing how many angels dance on the head of a pin...we will never know.
davehutchinson67 2 months ago
@MegansAFox2010 Technically Rome was created by Trojan refugees (according to the roman mythology) who lost the Trojan war.
woo1693 2 months ago
@MegansAFox2010 Well, if you want to get technical the Greek's existed because of the Egyptian's...
LatinPrayers 1 month ago
@warbossgrotsmasha23 Without the USA , the UK wouldn't exist. You would have been crushed under Nazi boots. We owe our independence to the French, not to your crumbling fucking Empire.
EpicTrollBeastMan 3 months ago
@EpicTrollBeastMan Like what? No US in the war = red Europe, independent UK.
LestatxLouis1 3 months ago
@EpicTrollBeastMan yeah and france would have been just another uncivilized land without proper roads and many things....rome gave france roman law, architecture, military discipline, civil administration and so on and so on that napoleon bonaparte used to the most extreme to make france a super power, a new rome and he a new caesar
warbossgrotsmasha23 3 months ago
@warbossgrotsmasha23 sorry, Rome exists because of GREEK cultur. same gods same knowladge - different names ;)
Edgarssprogis 2 months ago
gay music...
WatchTheTrailers 3 months ago
I nostri gloriosi antenati! W ROMA W L'ITALIA!
leonedisanmarco92 4 months ago 12
This has been flagged as spam show
Learn more: Le Genie Celtique et le Monde Invisible
Site: spirite.free.fr/ouvrages/genie/genie.htm
silviompge 4 months ago
EUROPA!
VigisKane 4 months ago
The Chinese had large, highly organized, bureaucratic states before Rome had even ventured out of Latium. That immediately gives them a strategic edge because winning wars is about organization, not weapons.
In terms of battlefield operations themselves, the Chinese had large forces of crossbows when the Romans had mainly melee forces. I'm not saying it's cut and dry but contemporary Chinese armies were definitely capable of defeating a Roman army in battle. The rest depends on specifics.
xxJasterMereelxx 4 months ago
@xxJasterMereelxx The roman army is historically know for having one of the best organized and most well disciplined armies in history. They had a few formations to stop arrows, as well as crossbows. Not to mention, their superior navy. Roman cavalry was feared by many barbarians and civilized armies. Not to mention the roman roads, which would allow the roman army to move much more quickly then the chines if they invaded.
Also wernt the Chinese reliant on weak iron for armor and weapons?
KukSoolKarl 4 months ago in playlist KukSoolKarl's favorites
@KukSoolKarl
Ancient Greece?
Wow, what a stupid comment. Stop watching 300, kid.
Ancient Greece? You mean the Greek city states? The Greek city states were weak and never united.
Not even the Macedonian army could face Rome, and they were superior to the ancient Greeks.
The Macedonian army lacks manpower and strength.
China was the "middle kingdom". Even the Roman Empire respected the vastness and cultural superiority of China. China was at it's height during different time periods.
ThebanPhalanx 4 months ago
@KukSoolKarl
Remember, the Art of War? The Three Kingdoms? China was never "unified at that time". Many different dynasties. They were "Chinese". You really lack history. Warfare isn't about "being cool and 300-like".
It's about lgoistics and mapower. China had wealth and that. Miltiary powress and experience.
Rome couldn't pacify the Northern barbarians. Too many barbarians, outnumbered their legions.
Guess how many people were in China? Even more people, even more training/weapons.
ThebanPhalanx 4 months ago
@KukSoolKarl
I understand that you think Chinese people are weak and pathetic.
Im talking from a historical and logical sense. I repsect Roman history more, but stating blatant and baseless statements like yours offends me. It offends the academic integrity of history.
Weak iron and armour? I bet you got that theory from the modern reputation of "Chinese manufacturing".
ThebanPhalanx 4 months ago
@KukSoolKarl
The Chinese had large, highly organized, bureaucratic states before Rome had even ventured out of Latium. That immediately gives them a strategic edge because winning wars is about organization, not weapons.
In terms of battlefield operations themselves, the Chinese had large forces of crossbows when the Romans had mainly melee forces. I'm not saying it's cut and dry but contemporary Chinese armies were definitely capable of defeating a Roman army in battle.
ThebanPhalanx 4 months ago
@KukSoolKarl
Kid, your ignorance only shows that your historical knowledge is based on movies like 300 and Gladiator. Good work.
Learn the history of the Chinese people, before you learn the history of the Roman Republic/Empire, Hellenistic Greece and "classical Greece".
Idiot. Seriously, Ancient Greece can't even conquer Persia. Only Macedonia.
ThebanPhalanx 4 months ago
@KukSoolKarl
I couldn't resist raping ignorant kids.
Superior navy? LOL Roman Roads? LOL Yeah to can extend roads to China... IDIOT. Crossbows? Who invented them? Canons? Who invented them? Spartans were disciplined, they got raped by Thebans, Macedonians and eventually Romans.... Your whole arguement is invalid.
ThebanPhalanx 4 months ago
@ThebanPhalanx This argument started with some one saying China could rape Rome. That leads me to believe that China would be the attackers, that's where the Roman roads come into play. Also China would never have heard of Rome until she was at her height, do simply to distance. So for China to invade they would have to march a long distance and have an incredibly long supply line. As Sun Tzu says, it is not wise to stretch a line that far. And an army of billions can not live off the land.
KukSoolKarl 4 months ago in playlist KukSoolKarl's favorites
@ThebanPhalanx Also the question comes down to what technology do the Chinese have? And would they bring a lot of siege equipment or food? Remember to load a supply wagon, something has to pull it and that something has to eat. So to move a supply line from China to Rome you not only have to feed the men but the pack animals. Which means the pack animals have to carry more food. This would mean an attacking Chinese army would be moving only a few miles a day if they brought the numbers.
KukSoolKarl 4 months ago in playlist KukSoolKarl's favorites
@ThebanPhalanx Lastly, I am ignorant of Chinese history as they simply never interested me. Though xxJasterMereelxx has changed that. However I think in a war were longestics will play heavily the Romans will win simply because the Chinese are to big to move anywhere quickly. Speed, Discipline, knowledge of the territory, native mercenaries and the simple ability to conquer will pull Rome through, though with high losses.
What did the Chinese conquer? Besides themselves? Enlighten me
KukSoolKarl 4 months ago in playlist KukSoolKarl's favorites
@ThebanPhalanx Its very valid, you just don't like the fact you lost the whole arguement and making up shit xD the Spartans lost battles before their military civilization came to sight. After which, no one would challange them. And Rome along with Macedonia, didn't challange Sparta to open war xD they aren't stupid like you man, they negotiated with them.
ArcTrooper673 4 months ago
@KukSoolKarl First, yes, Roman power relied very much on the discipline and organization of their armies, but this has to be considered relative to who they fought. Every time the Romans fought other disciplined, organized armies they often lost until the manpower reserves of Italy could be brought to bear. The Chinese were at least as organized as those enemies but beat Italy in manpower. All the advantages that Rome enjoyed don't apply in a confrontation with contemporary Chinese civilization.
xxJasterMereelxx 4 months ago
@xxJasterMereelxx I am not sure about manpower. At their respective zenith the two empires had more or less the same population: 80 millions. Moreover, the best reserves not necessairly came from Italy: the spanish or narbonensis legions were as good.
docsog 4 months ago
@KukSoolKarl Most of those arrow defense techniques were only useful during sieges. I'm sure you're referring to the testudo formation, which would have been run down by cavalry if they had tried it in the field. Which explains why they didn't. As I said, it's not cut and dry; in battle itself it could go either way depending on specifics. I only favor the Chinese overall because of strategic considerations (like manpower, and mass production and interchangeability of crossbow parts)
xxJasterMereelxx 4 months ago
@xxJasterMereelxx Your argument has peeked my interest in the study of Chinese history.
When I referred to arrow defense, I was thinking more of their anty-calvery formation. A line of shields with another line higher up, normal with gaps for spears. As from my understanding of Chinese martial arts, (my current only understanding of Chinese military) did they have weak iron? Isn't that why they have that swords that's floppy, or the swords that are really heavy? Also, what was their armor like?
KukSoolKarl 4 months ago in playlist KukSoolKarl's favorites
@KukSoolKarl That formation you mentioned *is* testudo, which is not for anti-cavalry (and the Romans didn't use spears, they used javelins). Chinese soldiers of the period would have used mainly polearms like the Ge or Ji, which has been (imprecisely) translated as "halberd". When the Chinese adopted iron weapons, it was of approximately the same quality as Roman iron weapons of the period. There is no significant technological difference (except crossbows). The difference is method.
xxJasterMereelxx 4 months ago
@xxJasterMereelxx
In theory a confrontation between Rome and Han China would be nearly impossible to predict. The chinese usually fielded larger armies than that of Rome mainly because Han china military tradition was known for conscription and although a Roman top gear matched with a Han top gear would be roughly of the same quality, most historinas agree that Rome would on average better gear.
WolfganggAmadeus 3 months ago
@xxJasterMereelxx
Han cavalary is good but not nearly as good as that of the middle east (like that of Persia, Armenia and Anatolia) which in turns means the Romans had easy acess to top notch cavalary (on a side note Hadrian was the first Roman emperor to form a permanent catafractarii unit). Chinese cavalary got better in the three kingdoms period (soon after the Han china).
WolfganggAmadeus 3 months ago
@ThebanPhalanx > with the fact three rows of the spears would be out and ready for them. Then, once the spears were useless, the Greeks would have used their shortswords. Which, once the Chinese got close, the Greeks would have slaughtered them. The Spartan forces alone could have slaughtered many of the Chinese forces. So if the Romans could have defeated the Greeks as they did, China would have zero chances against them. Only Sun Tzu has my respect, because he alone could have won it.
ArcTrooper673 4 months ago
@ArcTrooper673 And, if the Spartan and Greeks could have had another Thermopylae, with the pass guarded this time, then then China could have emptied its armies and been slaughtered.
One interesting fact is Rome conjured Greece but did not fight Sparta. Not even Alexander the Great messed with Sparta. In fact if I remember my resurch paper right Rome used Spartan forces to defend one of her northern borders. Until Rome fell that border didn't fall. China couldn't pare anyone but themselves.
KukSoolKarl 4 months ago
@KukSoolKarl Exactly, That guy who claims Rome wasn't a super power... Is a big time idiot, they really need to read up. Sparta alone could have defeated the Chinese because of one majore factor. THEY WEREN'T SOLDIERS. Back then, Chinese soldiers were farmers given weapons and then trained for a month or two for battle. Spartans were training since they were seven years old. Pid the two together, Sparta would have came out on top.
ArcTrooper673 4 months ago
What movies and Tv series are these clips from?
I recognize clips for HBOs Rome but not the rest
Bennnnny1987 4 months ago
um?? rome would kick the shit out of china at the time bro,,, its like a cat going up against a tiger
emporroll134 4 months ago
@emporroll134
Funny how Rome was raped by barbarians.
You ignorant fool. At the height of the Chinese Empire, they would RAPE the shit out of Rome at its height.
Learn your history, kid. You fail to realise which country was culturally, scientifically and militaristically superior, for its time.
Not even medieval nations could touch China. Only all of them together, eventually, stealling Chinese technology, could take China.
ThebanPhalanx 4 months ago
@ThebanPhalanx I just want to get my two cents worth in the I'll shut up. At its height Rome was nearly twice as large as china. And china at its strongest got kicked out of Korea. (facts are a little fuzzy about the Korean thing.) Also Chinese armies had size but from what I remembered lacked the discipline of a roman legion. It should also be noted that Barbarians couldn't touch Rome in its golden age. It wasn't until the decline of Rome and all her political troubles that Rome got raped.
KukSoolKarl 4 months ago
@ThebanPhalanx rome raped by barbarians?...ahahahahah rome falled for internal crisis....barbarians invasions were a consequence of the fall of the empire....roman empire was the most durable of the history....rome ruled the world for 1000 years..compared to the roman the chinese empire was shit.....you study history....
Cuoreromano90 4 months ago
@ThebanPhalanx i forget.....you'are a poor bastard.....
Cuoreromano90 4 months ago
@ThebanPhalanx Dude, China would have been raped. Hell, the forces from Ancient Greece could have destroyed the Chinese forces. One major reason, superior fighting skills and tactics. Not to mention the fact they wore bronze armor and used a shield that was half their size and could easily defended them from anything the Chinese threw at them. Last but not least, the Greek Weapons. They used a 8 foot spear, in which three rows of them would have impaled most of the Chinese forces>
ArcTrooper673 4 months ago
Rome was not the mightiest.
In the time of Rome, China was united under one banner. Had it been war between Rome and China the result would be unclear. Therefore I do not agree with what the uploader has written in the description bar.
VictumRoManius 4 months ago
Learn more
Le Genie Celtique et le Monde Invisible .
spirite.free.fr/ouvrages/genie/genie.htm
silviompge 4 months ago
form which movie is the scene at 3:40 ??
TheDurex93 4 months ago in playlist history
video name?
flamycool 4 months ago
which films?????
TheBrightestFan 5 months ago
mightiest millitray machine in ancient world
romulus755 5 months ago
3 people was not accepted in the roman Army!
sweAndreasFilm 5 months ago
@sweAndreasFilm they were to week even weeker then a slave!
sweAndreasFilm 5 months ago
Music???
sweAndreasFilm 6 months ago
I've have been thinking that if Caio Julius Ceasar wasn't murdered we would speak latin adn would be called romans
MrCaioAlexandre 8 months ago
100% European 100% Latin
Away those mutant and uncivilized Germanics.
benfalas 11 months ago
@benfalas germanics are european as well
muuraap 8 months ago
@benfalas you got your government from the greeks and your armor from celts your sword from iberia. roman thieves
Yorgar 6 months ago
100% european. 100% proud <3 GOD BLESS EUROPE!
KumarZimmerman08 1 year ago 47
@KumarZimmerman08
Dude, I don't think that any other people in history have been more divided than the Europeans ^^
PoppingSanta 6 months ago
@KumarZimmerman08 romans didn't believe in any modern gods. plus modern europeans are mainly originally from asia. but yeah, i love europe and i want to see europe proud and not drowning in the moral relativism and a sense of collective european guilt that is being foisted upon us for ideological reasons.
topperheartramada 6 months ago
@topperheartramada
You love something you don't know really. Modern europeans came not from Asia, they live there from millennia.
Miauriceful 5 months ago
@KumarZimmerman08 *Gods* bless europe
Arvedui01 5 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@KumarZimmerman08 FUCK your europe
raincomess 5 months ago
@raincomess Fuck you?
flamycool 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@raincomess fuck your country then
pcgamer997 4 months ago
very end = lol
JulianusFlavius1 1 year ago
what song is that? sort of like it.
Crucible52 1 year ago
@Crucible52 Europa by Globus
Bolshevik327 1 year ago 8
@Bolshevik327 The song would be better if it was apart of a war montage covering all of military history. Ancient, Romans, Napoleonic, WW1/WW2, etc. etc. It would just fit better, not just the Romans.
Crucible52 1 year ago
Roma mater urbium
EUFede 1 year ago
@EUFede Doesn't that mean Rome is the mother city??? Oh by the way are you studying latin???
memphisdarkwolf 1 year ago
@memphisdarkwolf roma mater orbium means that rome the queen of the cities... i guess
anyway yes have been studing latina at the highschool for 5 year but it was 4 years ago
EUFede 1 year ago
@EUFede Now that i look at it ,it seems to me to mean Rome the mother of all cities??? You'd have to check.
memphisdarkwolf 1 year ago
@memphisdarkwolf yes if i remeber right they used to say it
EUFede 1 year ago
@EUFede
It means "Rome mother of the world".
Miauriceful 8 months ago