I enjoyed your videos. I realized long ago that the Father is light. The Son is Word / Wave. The Holy Spirit is Consciousness. This trinity is God. God projects Himself in an image into reality as Genesis 1:27 says. The duality of light, both particle and wave, is how matter becomes form. Consciousness (Spirit) then animates this matter. John 1 reveals this. Hebrews 11 reveals this. Colossians 1:1 reveals this. The image is a hologram. God is AMAZING! The Son is the way home.
This is how the universe will end according to the Quran, I hope you like it: Quran Vs. Lawrence Krauss and "A Universe From Nothing": /watch?v=cv7lCR-7AKQ
Does your imaginary friend(ie.God) fuck your other imaginary friend(ie.Mother Nature)? Don't you see that one is as ridiculous as the other? Yet people instantly capitulate when you say that Mother Nature isn't actually real and then they will fight vehemently that God is real. Both are not. Both are obviously imaginary.
john f kennedy is the reincarnation of abraham lincoln. i am the reincarnatioin of albert einstein. i'm not kidding. i've had dream of the holocaust. i remember those terrrible times until i came over to america. i also think like an alien most of the time. i feel like i have no emotions. i have no social intelligence.
LOL It is quite possible to prove that god does not exist. All anyone has to do is read the history of any religion and all religions in general and that explains exactly where and who created each religion and each god. That will eliminate each and every god ever invented by man leaving no gods to be explained.
Thoe I belive in a higher power; That it is a god, many gods, or anything else, I belive even more in free decisions. If God was to controle our every move and decisions, then they would be no purpouse for a Heven or a Hell, for we would all be following what God ask of us. My comment is not against you, but it is what I belive of our existence. God made us, he waches us and he supports us. But we must all remember the frase "if we want something achived we must work for it." It's up to us.
Could one of you Jesus nuts please explain something? Is it your claim that the creator is a sociopath who created billions of people to torture for all eternity for simply not believing something that really makes no sense? Or do you claim that he is INCAPABLE of saving people who don't believe some nonsense because your god is not as powerful as Satan? Which is it? Is your god completely psychotic or just incompetent?
Love your video and being gracious to others to object to anything they may wish to banter about. Bravo! And this might sound like I'm splitting hairs here(Obviously we know the "meat" of what you are saying) Yeah, I'm weird on this one point. It is pronounced PLETHORA ! Not PLETH- THOR- A. Thanks for your video!
How could some of the scientists permit themselves to make a claim that would necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of the universe, when their knowledge of the total scheme of being is *close* to zero, when confronted with a whole mass of unknowns concerning this very earth and tangible, lifeless matter, let alone the whole universe?
Do scientific discoveries and knowledge cause such a scientist to conclude that matter, *unknowing and unperceiving *, is his creator and that of all beings?
No?
Then how can the atheists and some of the scientists delude themselve and *believe* that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world? ....
What is called science by the *science-worshippers* of the present age and regarded by them as equivalent to the sum total of *reality*, is simply a collection of laws applicable to a single dimension of the world. The result of all human effort and experimentation is a body of knowledge concerning a minute bright dot comparable to the dim light of a candle-surrounded by a dark night enveloping a huge desert of indefinite extent.
All praise is due to ALLAH, the Lord of the Universe.
what about the "three body problem"? if even within classical mechanics you cannot predict the futures of three particles (given initial positions and momentum), how can you do so for the whole universe?
what about the "three body problem"? if even within classical mechanics you cannot predict the futures of three particles (given initial positions and momentum), how can you do so for the whole universe?
I liked how you put in a "foundation" for your presentation, before your presentation, it helps to show where your coming from and where your going with this. I'm very interested in "free will" and "determinism" (wither by God or nature), and how you might address those issues. I'm not sure that "free will" can be logically resolved ( the God version anyway), but would remain a mystery of God. But I'm willing to find out if I'm wrong!
Premonitions- Dejavu. Sleeping and seeing when awake a dream.
Memories- Traveling to a better time in my life through my mind.
Past lives- Remembering stuff from another time period. With that said quarks can not be followed. Everything decomposes to be used by what has not yet decomposed...
History- History when studied reveals that it happens over and over again. Could this be from reincarnation? Due to the same atoms rebinding...
So is it safe to say there is no free will. 1 thing that quantum phisics can't prove is relativity at sizes smaller then atoms. So my theory is that we are on a time line. Yesterday is being played out today but yesterday. So safe to say that on my birth date when i turn 26 that I am also being born. time can not be explained. But one can travel though time through memory. Is memory time travel? Is memory the link that can not be explained. Is it the relativity of the universe?
Just a few seonds in and felt the need to comment... IF YOU BELIEVE IN GOD you'd understand that by Him all things are possible and He is just clever enough to give you an explination IF you seek it.
Newton and Einstein believed in God so you can have faith and good science. In my video The Paradox of Schrodingers Cat an artist view Time has symmetry and geometry that can explaining the paradoxes of Quantum Physics and why we have free will.
Who tortured "the scientists?" I didn't know the Catholic church was still rounding people up during the time quantum mechanics was starting to gain momentum. Nor did I know that Gallileo, Newton, Copernicus, etc. atheistic scientists.
The Nazis used the teachings of Martin Luther. He believed they were of the devil and formulated an eight point plan for their extermination. Among other things, Luther advocated taking the Jews property, destroying their holy books and churches, and that killing them should not be a crime. Look up On the Jews and Their Lies, 1543, by Martin Luther (1483-1546).
Adolf Hitler himself was Catholic. The hate that Protestants advocate also extends to their hate and lies about atheists.
Hitler was not a Christian. I wish some of you would study this matter before spouting off things that just seem, on the surface, to support your agenda.
Lemaitre, a priest, was one of the most important theoretical physicist of our time who pioneered the Big Bang movement along with Freidman. You also slyly ignored the other ones I noted down, which is more than convnient.
Hitler was not as evil as he was only a Catholic, not a true devil worshiping Christian.
Jesus is no messiah; god had forsaken him and had him killed for impersonating his son. David is gods son Psalm 2: 7. Christians worshiping Jesus as part of God, of the Trinity, or equal to god is blasphemy, praying to Jesus breaks the first commandment not to have any other Gods.
Granted they can. That reflects no more about Christianity than it does about the person itself.
And Mein Kampf was a propaganda tool. In his secret table talk exerpts he denounces Christianity and compares it to a desease that should be eradicated. He says it's a lie that was invented by jews.
So far from being a Christian, he actually despised it.
The elimination of the Jews was part 1 of 2 of Hitler's ultimate plan. Part 2 was the erradication of Christianity from Nazi soil and to replace it with his own neo-paganistic state ideology.
I do agree that the actions of a person do not reflect upon their chosen religion. Christians can do very good and very evil things, and likewise so can atheists, Muslims, and Buddhists. I just had an issue with the Hitler-was-not-a-christian-and-therefore-he was-an-atheist-and-therefore-atheists-are-evil methodology.
Not at all. Do not assume I'm dropping the blame on any particular worldview. Christians and atheists alike are just as apt to be immoral and moral. We're all human beings.
I just take issue, much like you, when certain historical inaccuracies are said to support an agenda. No more and no less.
When Abraham Lincoln makes public addresses concerning his own Christian religosity, he is simply an atheist who is professing belief for political gains, but when Hitler does the same, this irrefutably proves that he was religious?
@UNFFwildcard There are those who say they are Christian and are not. Just like there were those who said they were Jews, but were of the synagogue of Satan according to Saint John. The fruit of the knowledge of good and evil was ...the ego - the self centered nature that seeks power and exercises the duties of God without the ability to do so rightly. The serpent that gave this fruit to Adam and Eve was not a literal snake, but a supernatural being. We have film of it :North Port Devil
@WNxFish Hitler was antiChristian. Thought it was too soft - turn the other cheek etc. That is why he was able to kill so many people without moral problems. He was a (twisted) follower of Nietzsche and a Darwinist.
I watched the whole series; the extra-dimensional arguments for God are very good, but I think your dependence on a dogmatic use of today's accepted interpretations of scientific evidence will come back to haunt you.
Science will eventually converge onto the biblical account.
What is now modeled as the inflationary & horizon epics in early cosmogony will finally be seen as the information-homogeneous anti-de Sitter / de Sitter space phase transition that took place around 6,000 YA.
Thanks for this series. Quantum mechanics is something I've struggled with, particularly in understanding what appears to be a layered system, so this series is raising quite a few interesting topics.
While I was looking up some of the stuff you mentioned, I noticed that Von Lenard was a supporter of Nazi philosophy, that's kinf of ironic because a Jew was the champion of the photoelectric theory.
This video so long is great, and you organized it very well, I just have one question though. Isn't it true that without Newtonian Physics and Newton's introduction of classical physics, then our current understanding of quantum physics wouldn't exist? So Newton was still beneficial right?
"Isn't it true that without Newtonian Physics and Newton's introduction of classical physics, then our current understanding of quantum physics wouldn't exist? So Newton was still beneficial right?"
Of course! Any scientific development is a benefit to the developments that come after it! Remember too for example, that even while we know gravity is Einsteinian, we still use Newtonian physics in building our rockets and numerous other applications.
Great minds can not agree on ALL things, so what makes us mental midgets think we will be able to agree?
The best we can do is explore ALL possibilities, by reading reliable sources on the wonders of the universe, which includes the wonders on earth.
To creationists, I would say, "If you must deny science, why not deny it ALL the way. Next time refuse Novocaine and anesthesia when undergoing any dental work or operation."
Jesus was a carpenter. Rev. 19:16 "on his thigh he has this name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS." After you read that to see he is boss, he shows you his wood.
The problem with ALL these arguments are that they are all subjective - thus to for instance try get characteristics of god is subjective.... so meh these philosophy debates don't get anywhere.
btw to the guys arguing about the laws of logic - It is all to do with cause and effect. Basically an effect won't happen without a cause
All your points and arguments lean towards Deism and a Deist God. Yahweh is not God and his "holy word" is not consistent with the Creation. God's natural laws are all that is needed to govern the universe. God gave us reason, not religion!
Something puzzles me about your introduction UNFF, and I assure you that I 'm not trying to be malicious. I am just genuinely curious. You support the Big Bang, abiogenesis and evolution, yet you hold a belief in a "personal" god. How do you reconcile it all?
Again, I'm not judging or opposing your beliefs; I have friends who are both scientifically trained and deeply religious, and I am always interested in experiences different from my own.
If god is omnipotent why use such a slow painful process like evolution, why not just snap your fingers. If there was death before sin then why do we need saving from more death? When did he decide "ok, you have souls now!" A bunch of needless hydrogen in space reflects gods shadow?
I think the issue with that thinking is your looking at it as ''how would I do it'', and thats where that line of reasoning should end. It's semantics more than anything else, theres plenty other issues to work your way around before any of that.
You will no doubt get absolutely fallacious responses from atheists, most of which just make idiotic assertions without warrant. See below for examples.
"most of which just make idiotic assertions without warrant."
^^^Like the idiotic assertion that the Laws of Logic are actual existence's, rather than just conceptual applications that describe existence, and the facts of reality.
.. A claim I have never made. Nor do proponents of the transcendental argument in its true form. You seem to be under the mistaken understanding that the laws act as platonic forms, abstractions; this would make our use and appeal to them arbitrary. This isn't TAG.
Atheists are forced to either assert the laws as reflecting the nature of the universe, or by the erratic whim of neurological firing;
The laws of logic have to do with cause and effect - Basically thing's don't happen without a cause. That is the basis of logic, and the basis of our universe.
A) I asked a person WHAT the laws of logic are. You tell me what they DEAL with.
That dog don't hunt
B) Then you say the Laws of Logic deal with cause and effect. There is a Law called the Law of Cause and Effect(Causality). Further, it says Laws of LOGIC. Not Cause and Effect, LOGIC.
"I'm not telling you what they deal with, i'm telling you what it is."
^^^You appear to be confused. What is my clock? It's plastic. What is a school? It's often a brick structure. What is this piece of paper? A material made of cellulose pulp derived mainly from wood or rags or certain grasses.
What are the Laws of Logic? You telling me they are cause and effect is wrong. Not only because the very title of Laws of LOGIC show otherwise, but that doesn't say WHAT they are.
Um no, because they are no physical, unlike the examples you gave.
It's like you asking what are the laws of physics and then comparing it to saying what is a school, it's made of bricks.
In fact if anything a school is a place of learning, it doesn't matter what its physical makeup is but rather it is associated with being a place of learning. It could be in a park, anyway that is besides the point. The fact remains the law of logic is not a physical thing, rather a conceptual reality.
Further you saying what is my clock - answering it is plastic is stupid. If you asked what is the clock made of, then plastic, what is a clock, it is a device which tells the time. What are the laws of logic they are laws which dictate how the universe works, they are made up of exclusively of cause and effect.
Your examples are rather stupid tbh, Definitions incorporate the function of the *thing*.
definition clock - "measure the time or duration of an event or action"
Logic is a form of reasoning which uses at its basis cause and effect to come to its conclusions.
To say a clock is simply plastic is stupid, rather it is a device which tells the time is a much better description of a clock.
Remember the function of the thing goes in a definition, not what it is litterly made of. A school is a place of learning not just a building made of bricks, otherwise using that LOGIC i could say my home is a school...i mean it is made of bricks 0.o
^^^Of course you will. From what I've seen of you, it's not surprising you would parrot and ape what someone else told you at school. Hahahahaha! Not surprising you would rather have someone else think for you, and control your positions, rather than thinking for yourself. Hahaha!
Ok now your off topic and just trying to argue for the sake of arguing on youtube, now is about the time you should start thinking about getting a life tbh.
Lol you keyboard warrior! Very tough from behind a keyboard well done ;)
I'm glad you got lol's from the word "shit" instead of actually making a decent reply as to why i shouldn't listen to my professor 0.o.
Whatever i have answered you question so cbf replying to your now worthless arguments.
"Ok now your off topic and just trying to argue for the sake of arguing on youtube, now is about the time you should start thinking about getting a life tbh."
Regarding scientiific inaccuracy, there are no observed singularities. Singulariteis are mathemtacal phenomena which result from failings in theoretical frameworks.
"Regarding scientiific inaccuracy, there are no observed singularities. Singulariteis are mathemtacal phenomena which result from failings in theoretical frameworks. "
Perhaps a singularity isn't the best way to describe it. At the first instanton of time, we don't know what the conditions of the universe are like. All we know is that everything can be traced back to a universe of infintessimal size.
The begining of what we see is interesting. While what we see today traces back to something that fit is a very small size (small enough that our understanding of physics falls apart --- thus the singularity), it is the observable universe that is finite today and very small 13.7 Byrs ago. The size of the entire universe is unknowable, but has no limit (like an infinite string, or a closed loop of string).
This series looks quite good UNFF . I've always thought of you as one of the most honest Christians on YT , and while I'm agnostic , I always take away something from your vids .
Your made up God can't do anything, since it lacks a primary attribute. This is proven by the corollary of the contrary. Since the human concept of "NOTHING". lacks a primary attribute. That's why it's "NOTHING". So your made up God can't be creator of anything.
Something immaterial cannot love, decide, reason, create, or know anything, since it doesn't have the kinetic potential to instantiate such actualities.
I'm a creationist, but not in the sense of most. I am a creationist in the sense that evolution can work and there is no need to fear it. Neocreationist if I might say. Also believe in the big bang theory. I also believe in the Universe being over 15 billion years old. it's dogmatic to take Genisis literal. "A well spoken word is like golden Apples on a dish," A word within a word within a word.
" I can't verify that it is irrational to believe in things that cannot be verified?"
As you know, due to your plethora of scientific knowledge, you wouild rightly known that science is bound by a dynamic process called methodological naturalism, which by definition, cannot comment on the existence of the supernatural. God cannot be tested, it's ultimately a metaphysical question. As for science, it's a slave to philosophy and cannot account for a multitude of things in the universe
"why would we try to understand the SUPER-NATURAL world?"
Do you care about Truth? Whether there is a mind behind this universe? What about life after death, if one's soul does not end at the grave, but continues to live..? He ultimately has everything to gain, and everything to lose. What will you wager?
I'm not going to repeat myself over and over. I didn't mention any of the things you listed above. I made only ONE point and I repeated it 3 times...
UNFFwildcard wants people to question these things, as he said in the video. I'm not trolling! I'm just brining up what I consider to be a valid point.
Oh really? I was sure the mind was metaphysical, as most philosophers would agree. If it was actually physical, how much does the mind weight, how long is it, where is it located, how much do thoughts weigh? God is immaterial, just like the mind
"If it was actually physical, how much does the mind weight, how long is it, where is it located, how much do thoughts weigh?"
These are meaningless questions. "Mind" is a word, a mere concept, not a thing or entity. We use it to describe consciousness, which emerges from the brain.
"God is immaterial"
Need God be immaterial? Could God not be the forces of nature?
bec he said "god does not play dice" but Neils Bohr said "stop telling god what to do with his dice" The subatomic particles in an atom change behavior when viewing them, which is a type of cause and effect, sure, and a predictability. but not an absolute.
Problem one. You're using outdated theories that existed before quantum mechanics. We now know that the universe is not a machine, and there are no set rules. Einstein's theory of light particles led to quantum mechanics. Einstein himself hated quantum mechanics,
After watching Theologica37's latest vid, I think it's fairly easy to establish that whatever caused the universe is a timeless, all-powerful brute fact.
But HOW do we establish that the brute fact is a person, with a will and intelligence?
Please, if you could answer this...
I was also curious, what is your background, what do you do?
Excellent! I will jump on any opportunity to debate you. So far I have nothing to object to, except perhaps that I don't really find the indeterministic nature of the universe to be an argument for or against a God. My intuition tells me that if God exist, he would not be limited to what can be determined and unless you want to attribute free will to the indeterminable fluctuations of particles it doesn't really change anything about the argument of free will. I will follow this with interest!
I enjoyed your videos. I realized long ago that the Father is light. The Son is Word / Wave. The Holy Spirit is Consciousness. This trinity is God. God projects Himself in an image into reality as Genesis 1:27 says. The duality of light, both particle and wave, is how matter becomes form. Consciousness (Spirit) then animates this matter. John 1 reveals this. Hebrews 11 reveals this. Colossians 1:1 reveals this. The image is a hologram. God is AMAZING! The Son is the way home.
88tuner 3 months ago
Hi,
This is how the universe will end according to the Quran, I hope you like it: Quran Vs. Lawrence Krauss and "A Universe From Nothing": /watch?v=cv7lCR-7AKQ
helasmoh 3 months ago
Does your imaginary friend(ie.God) fuck your other imaginary friend(ie.Mother Nature)? Don't you see that one is as ridiculous as the other? Yet people instantly capitulate when you say that Mother Nature isn't actually real and then they will fight vehemently that God is real. Both are not. Both are obviously imaginary.
TheEruditepolymath 6 months ago
john f kennedy is the reincarnation of abraham lincoln. i am the reincarnatioin of albert einstein. i'm not kidding. i've had dream of the holocaust. i remember those terrrible times until i came over to america. i also think like an alien most of the time. i feel like i have no emotions. i have no social intelligence.
henf5671 7 months ago
LOL It is quite possible to prove that god does not exist. All anyone has to do is read the history of any religion and all religions in general and that explains exactly where and who created each religion and each god. That will eliminate each and every god ever invented by man leaving no gods to be explained.
mymojorisin 8 months ago
Haven,t heard it all yet, but seem to follow the logic of buddha.
karljjr 9 months ago
Thoe I belive in a higher power; That it is a god, many gods, or anything else, I belive even more in free decisions. If God was to controle our every move and decisions, then they would be no purpouse for a Heven or a Hell, for we would all be following what God ask of us. My comment is not against you, but it is what I belive of our existence. God made us, he waches us and he supports us. But we must all remember the frase "if we want something achived we must work for it." It's up to us.
PierreRMB 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Could one of you Jesus nuts please explain something? Is it your claim that the creator is a sociopath who created billions of people to torture for all eternity for simply not believing something that really makes no sense? Or do you claim that he is INCAPABLE of saving people who don't believe some nonsense because your god is not as powerful as Satan? Which is it? Is your god completely psychotic or just incompetent?
MasterOfSparks 9 months ago
this ellipsis . . . is > than "god."
Sexxistentialist 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
wrong as always
TheTheoryoflogic 1 year ago
Love your video and being gracious to others to object to anything they may wish to banter about. Bravo! And this might sound like I'm splitting hairs here(Obviously we know the "meat" of what you are saying) Yeah, I'm weird on this one point. It is pronounced PLETHORA ! Not PLETH- THOR- A. Thanks for your video!
gourmetmn 1 year ago
Richard Dawkins is god.
akrivera 1 year ago
@akrivera The atheist Delusion!
How could some of the scientists permit themselves to make a claim that would necessitate knowledge as extensive as the scheme of the universe, when their knowledge of the total scheme of being is *close* to zero, when confronted with a whole mass of unknowns concerning this very earth and tangible, lifeless matter, let alone the whole universe?
1tabligh 6 months ago
Do scientific discoveries and knowledge cause such a scientist to conclude that matter, *unknowing and unperceiving *, is his creator and that of all beings?
No?
Then how can the atheists and some of the scientists delude themselve and *believe* that hydrogen and oxygen, electrons and protons, should first produce themselves, then be the source for all other beings, and finally decree the laws that regulate themselves and the rest of the material world? ....
1tabligh 6 months ago
What is called science by the *science-worshippers* of the present age and regarded by them as equivalent to the sum total of *reality*, is simply a collection of laws applicable to a single dimension of the world. The result of all human effort and experimentation is a body of knowledge concerning a minute bright dot comparable to the dim light of a candle-surrounded by a dark night enveloping a huge desert of indefinite extent.
All praise is due to ALLAH, the Lord of the Universe.
1tabligh 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So... you are a Christian then?
YodatheJedi12 1 year ago
Free will is just intention.
Energy is the cause of all transformation.
God is what every you make it out to be, including nothing at all.
Juefawn 1 year ago
don wanna say anything... my comment wud be summed up in the following videos :
1. The matrix of all matter
2.The quantum apocalypse of holographic universe
3.The primacy of consciousness by peter russels
4.The mystery of consciousness by deepak chopra
Thats it ! Even if u dont wanna see all... at least see the first two !
P.S > none of the above vdeo is my upload .... its just that even if one of u ppl understand what im tryin to say..... my work is done... c ya !
worldsacrap 1 year ago
what about the "three body problem"? if even within classical mechanics you cannot predict the futures of three particles (given initial positions and momentum), how can you do so for the whole universe?
Heissenburger 1 year ago
what about the "three body problem"? if even within classical mechanics you cannot predict the futures of three particles (given initial positions and momentum), how can you do so for the whole universe?
Heissenburger 1 year ago
I liked how you put in a "foundation" for your presentation, before your presentation, it helps to show where your coming from and where your going with this. I'm very interested in "free will" and "determinism" (wither by God or nature), and how you might address those issues. I'm not sure that "free will" can be logically resolved ( the God version anyway), but would remain a mystery of God. But I'm willing to find out if I'm wrong!
kvash3154 1 year ago
yoou need a speech class wnx. desprately.
cosmosgod 1 year ago
Tesla is a Serb :)
zmajski777 1 year ago
I love ur video... finally poof of god believe
TheBalvin 1 year ago
Holy shit this guy slurs his words
shawnu036 1 year ago
we decide the future{Becoz we are at FREE WILL}
how we are at free will ????
look from 200,000 since humans are on the earth
what have they done to earth till today
Eg:if you use energy on garanted than you will lose it one day but if human keeps the nature cycles in balance we can live Longer
so you can ask me at every position and i will let you know that we are always at a free will
ask me a Question
digiviki007 2 years ago
Hi guys
i want you know that the knowledge you are talking about{Future predictions} It is the God's Power of knowledge that He knows every thing
and he knows every thing even before it had happened
this knowledge is one of His powers that He knows the Future
But what will happen in future ???
we are the people deciding about the future
digiviki007 2 years ago
you know I wish there was a website that let you look at yourself in other dimensions .. lol..
woyay 2 years ago
well if you can enter another dimension by choosing which one you want to enter you then have free will..
woyay 2 years ago
Hey, don't blame me. It's God's fault!
CMO999 2 years ago
god exists only in the minds of men.... and very stupid ones at that.
domboy22 2 years ago
Reasons for this theory are as follow.
Premonitions- Dejavu. Sleeping and seeing when awake a dream.
Memories- Traveling to a better time in my life through my mind.
Past lives- Remembering stuff from another time period. With that said quarks can not be followed. Everything decomposes to be used by what has not yet decomposed...
History- History when studied reveals that it happens over and over again. Could this be from reincarnation? Due to the same atoms rebinding...
ctrackmonger 2 years ago
So is it safe to say there is no free will. 1 thing that quantum phisics can't prove is relativity at sizes smaller then atoms. So my theory is that we are on a time line. Yesterday is being played out today but yesterday. So safe to say that on my birth date when i turn 26 that I am also being born. time can not be explained. But one can travel though time through memory. Is memory time travel? Is memory the link that can not be explained. Is it the relativity of the universe?
ctrackmonger 2 years ago
If there is phrophets that tell us the truth about the future and can predict it, then there is no free will...
Eloeem 2 years ago
anybody interested in free will should look up dan dennett the philosopher
MrXZodiacInfinitY 2 years ago
Just a few seonds in and felt the need to comment... IF YOU BELIEVE IN GOD you'd understand that by Him all things are possible and He is just clever enough to give you an explination IF you seek it.
mrjnya 2 years ago
Interesting video
Newton and Einstein believed in God so you can have faith and good science. In my video The Paradox of Schrodingers Cat an artist view Time has symmetry and geometry that can explaining the paradoxes of Quantum Physics and why we have free will.
nickharvey7 2 years ago
Finally!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Some one who understands God and Science co-exist! instant 5 stars!
brainlicker1 2 years ago
science is how things happen... religion is why
dropturdsonyou 2 years ago
=D awesomness
brainlicker1 2 years ago
I'm an atheist and an engineer well versed in physics. I like how you present your material. On to part 2 of 10.
TBucker 2 years ago 6
5*****
YogiToad 2 years ago
GodsShadow is my email address also my ingame nickname. Theres been a song about it and a band name. I started it in 1996.
JonothanSiple777 2 years ago
Who tortured "the scientists?" I didn't know the Catholic church was still rounding people up during the time quantum mechanics was starting to gain momentum. Nor did I know that Gallileo, Newton, Copernicus, etc. atheistic scientists.
Now that is hilarious :)
regelemihai 2 years ago
The Nazis used the teachings of Martin Luther. He believed they were of the devil and formulated an eight point plan for their extermination. Among other things, Luther advocated taking the Jews property, destroying their holy books and churches, and that killing them should not be a crime. Look up On the Jews and Their Lies, 1543, by Martin Luther (1483-1546).
Adolf Hitler himself was Catholic. The hate that Protestants advocate also extends to their hate and lies about atheists.
imaginethereisnogod 2 years ago
Hitler was not a Christian. I wish some of you would study this matter before spouting off things that just seem, on the surface, to support your agenda.
Lemaitre, a priest, was one of the most important theoretical physicist of our time who pioneered the Big Bang movement along with Freidman. You also slyly ignored the other ones I noted down, which is more than convnient.
regelemihai 2 years ago
Hitler was not as evil as he was only a Catholic, not a true devil worshiping Christian.
Jesus is no messiah; god had forsaken him and had him killed for impersonating his son. David is gods son Psalm 2: 7. Christians worshiping Jesus as part of God, of the Trinity, or equal to god is blasphemy, praying to Jesus breaks the first commandment not to have any other Gods.
imaginethereisnogod 2 years ago
Have you read Mein Kampf? Seen his speeches? If Hitler was an atheist he sure hid it well.
WNxFish 2 years ago
I never said he was an atheist; but he sure as hell wasn't a professing Christian, let alone a model Christian.
regelemihai 2 years ago
He repeatedly professed his Christianity. One of his justifications for rounding up Jews was that they killed Jesus. Seriously.
And the fact that he wasn't a model Christian has nothing to do with it. Christians can still be bad people.
WNxFish 2 years ago
Granted they can. That reflects no more about Christianity than it does about the person itself.
And Mein Kampf was a propaganda tool. In his secret table talk exerpts he denounces Christianity and compares it to a desease that should be eradicated. He says it's a lie that was invented by jews.
So far from being a Christian, he actually despised it.
regelemihai 2 years ago
The elimination of the Jews was part 1 of 2 of Hitler's ultimate plan. Part 2 was the erradication of Christianity from Nazi soil and to replace it with his own neo-paganistic state ideology.
UNFFwildcard 2 years ago
I do agree that the actions of a person do not reflect upon their chosen religion. Christians can do very good and very evil things, and likewise so can atheists, Muslims, and Buddhists. I just had an issue with the Hitler-was-not-a-christian-and-therefore-he was-an-atheist-and-therefore-atheists-are-evil methodology.
WNxFish 2 years ago
Not at all. Do not assume I'm dropping the blame on any particular worldview. Christians and atheists alike are just as apt to be immoral and moral. We're all human beings.
I just take issue, much like you, when certain historical inaccuracies are said to support an agenda. No more and no less.
regelemihai 2 years ago
When Abraham Lincoln makes public addresses concerning his own Christian religosity, he is simply an atheist who is professing belief for political gains, but when Hitler does the same, this irrefutably proves that he was religious?
UNFFwildcard 2 years ago 11
Abraham Lincoln was also a christian. I have no idea where you come up with he idea that I think he wasn't.
WNxFish 2 years ago
People hold to the belief that he wasn't religious at all. I dunno the detials, but atheists do claim that.
regelemihai 2 years ago
@UNFFwildcard There are those who say they are Christian and are not. Just like there were those who said they were Jews, but were of the synagogue of Satan according to Saint John. The fruit of the knowledge of good and evil was ...the ego - the self centered nature that seeks power and exercises the duties of God without the ability to do so rightly. The serpent that gave this fruit to Adam and Eve was not a literal snake, but a supernatural being. We have film of it :North Port Devil
Masonictoaster9 1 year ago
@WNxFish because the people of germany were christian and if he was to succeed he needed an excuses
superdubman999 1 year ago
@WNxFish Hitler was antiChristian. Thought it was too soft - turn the other cheek etc. That is why he was able to kill so many people without moral problems. He was a (twisted) follower of Nietzsche and a Darwinist.
henrydevries22 1 year ago
This is one of the best series on youtube. Good job UNFF! Keep up the good work man. I look forward to your next video!
AmGoDDoGmA 2 years ago
I watched the whole series; the extra-dimensional arguments for God are very good, but I think your dependence on a dogmatic use of today's accepted interpretations of scientific evidence will come back to haunt you.
Science will eventually converge onto the biblical account.
What is now modeled as the inflationary & horizon epics in early cosmogony will finally be seen as the information-homogeneous anti-de Sitter / de Sitter space phase transition that took place around 6,000 YA.
seanmPWH 2 years ago
seanmPWH I you want to know jesus when you get to heaven just sleep face down. Jesus will do unto you
imaginethereisnogod 2 years ago
why do you have to be a sucker to belive in anything any more? :(
KreepyKrow13 2 years ago
very interesting - you certainly know how to draw a sucker in.
i'm sucking.
franzpolak 2 years ago
A quick, polite criticism: Slow down when you speak.
AgentUnderdog1 2 years ago 6
I agree. Wildcard, please slow down a little bit. peace
MetaphysicsAddict 2 years ago
Thanks for this series. Quantum mechanics is something I've struggled with, particularly in understanding what appears to be a layered system, so this series is raising quite a few interesting topics.
scepticalpreacher 2 years ago
While I was looking up some of the stuff you mentioned, I noticed that Von Lenard was a supporter of Nazi philosophy, that's kinf of ironic because a Jew was the champion of the photoelectric theory.
This video so long is great, and you organized it very well, I just have one question though. Isn't it true that without Newtonian Physics and Newton's introduction of classical physics, then our current understanding of quantum physics wouldn't exist? So Newton was still beneficial right?
ogirv101 2 years ago
"Isn't it true that without Newtonian Physics and Newton's introduction of classical physics, then our current understanding of quantum physics wouldn't exist? So Newton was still beneficial right?"
Of course! Any scientific development is a benefit to the developments that come after it! Remember too for example, that even while we know gravity is Einsteinian, we still use Newtonian physics in building our rockets and numerous other applications.
UNFFwildcard 2 years ago
Great minds can not agree on ALL things, so what makes us mental midgets think we will be able to agree?
The best we can do is explore ALL possibilities, by reading reliable sources on the wonders of the universe, which includes the wonders on earth.
To creationists, I would say, "If you must deny science, why not deny it ALL the way. Next time refuse Novocaine and anesthesia when undergoing any dental work or operation."
gjsterp 2 years ago 3
Ha! Well said.
killeroftime978 2 years ago
Fundamentalist Preacher came upon a girl playing with a box holding a litter of new-born kittens. He asks what kind of kittens are those?
Theyre Christian kittens, she says. He left pleased she had Jesus in her thoughts.
Days later he saw her again. How are your Christian kittens?
Oh, they aren't Christian kittens, they're Atheist, she replied.
I thought they were Christian? kittens the preacher said, disturbed by the news.
Oh, they were. But now their eyes are open!
imaginethereisnogod 2 years ago
imaginethereisnogod,
That is hands down the worst joke I have ever heard in my life...
Super Fail.
Bosco239 2 years ago
O har har har har....
*sigh*.
regelemihai 2 years ago
Jesus was a carpenter. Rev. 19:16 "on his thigh he has this name written: KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS." After you read that to see he is boss, he shows you his wood.
imaginethereisnogod 2 years ago
???
Are you retarded?
regelemihai 2 years ago
Logic itslef isn't logic. Think about it.
alexwilton23 2 years ago
In the video description, I think you mean to say "objectives" instead of "objections" in the description for (1/8).
rucha58 2 years ago
I would love to watch this series. But, I'm pretty sure that I will be too stupid to understand.
I'll try again later. thx
KletosApostolos 2 years ago
Great stuff!!! Please slow down about 10%
jimmo42 2 years ago 2
The problem with ALL these arguments are that they are all subjective - thus to for instance try get characteristics of god is subjective.... so meh these philosophy debates don't get anywhere.
btw to the guys arguing about the laws of logic - It is all to do with cause and effect. Basically an effect won't happen without a cause
Your vid is good though
pheonex 2 years ago
We shall see about this Wildcard . . we shall see. It's on! It's on like Donkey Kong!
I really have no idea what that last part means . . . but damn dude it took you long enough :-P. This will be fun.
HonestDiscussioner 2 years ago
All your points and arguments lean towards Deism and a Deist God. Yahweh is not God and his "holy word" is not consistent with the Creation. God's natural laws are all that is needed to govern the universe. God gave us reason, not religion!
Deisthorizon 2 years ago
Comment removed
Deisthorizon 2 years ago
wat
KaseyAkira 2 years ago
Fantastically done. You capture the essence of God in the brilliant imagery of the cosmos.
TinyCoconut 2 years ago
hey send me and you know who an email we haven't heard from you
brickclimber 2 years ago
Although I don't believe in God, I like keeping my mind open, and thus, this series seem to be very interesting...
Ottmar555 2 years ago
Looks like it will be an interesting series
Great intro vid
DJ
djarm67 2 years ago
Darn all the Christians for not accepting Evolut....
...wait what?
(joke alert)
themanwhoknew 2 years ago
Well done, sir. I look forward to the next episode.
mrowepat 2 years ago
Something puzzles me about your introduction UNFF, and I assure you that I 'm not trying to be malicious. I am just genuinely curious. You support the Big Bang, abiogenesis and evolution, yet you hold a belief in a "personal" god. How do you reconcile it all?
Again, I'm not judging or opposing your beliefs; I have friends who are both scientifically trained and deeply religious, and I am always interested in experiences different from my own.
buzzausa 2 years ago
"You support the Big Bang, abiogenesis and evolution, yet you hold a belief in a "personal" god. How do you reconcile it all?"
I hope my series will show why.
UNFFwildcard 2 years ago
err....I hope my series will show how!
UNFFwildcard 2 years ago
If god is omnipotent why use such a slow painful process like evolution, why not just snap your fingers. If there was death before sin then why do we need saving from more death? When did he decide "ok, you have souls now!" A bunch of needless hydrogen in space reflects gods shadow?
jamminjago 2 years ago
I think the issue with that thinking is your looking at it as ''how would I do it'', and thats where that line of reasoning should end. It's semantics more than anything else, theres plenty other issues to work your way around before any of that.
scotsocool 2 years ago
Excellent video and I look forward to the series.
Jestepher 2 years ago
Great vid! I'm looking forward to the next vids in this series.
(I'm an atheist, but enjoy this channel)
DesertLaser 2 years ago
UNFF , this is a great video.
You will no doubt get absolutely fallacious responses from atheists, most of which just make idiotic assertions without warrant. See below for examples.
Theologica37 2 years ago
yeah the truth hurts but the sooner you stop deluding yourself the better
Leadman1989 2 years ago
In many cases, BOTH Theists and Atheists are often guilty of delusion and wishful thinking. I just thought I'd point that out.
Jestepher 2 years ago
@Theo
"most of which just make idiotic assertions without warrant."
^^^Like the idiotic assertion that the Laws of Logic are actual existence's, rather than just conceptual applications that describe existence, and the facts of reality.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
.. A claim I have never made. Nor do proponents of the transcendental argument in its true form. You seem to be under the mistaken understanding that the laws act as platonic forms, abstractions; this would make our use and appeal to them arbitrary. This isn't TAG.
Atheists are forced to either assert the laws as reflecting the nature of the universe, or by the erratic whim of neurological firing;
Inevitably attempting to ground objectivity by
variant appeal: A fallacy begging the question.
Theologica37 2 years ago
@Theo
What are the Laws of Logic according to you? What are they?
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
@Theologica37
Why does it seem like you are avoiding my question?
For the second time:
What are the Laws of Logic according to you? What are they?
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
The laws of logic have to do with cause and effect - Basically thing's don't happen without a cause. That is the basis of logic, and the basis of our universe.
pheonex 2 years ago
@pheonex
A) I asked a person WHAT the laws of logic are. You tell me what they DEAL with.
That dog don't hunt
B) Then you say the Laws of Logic deal with cause and effect. There is a Law called the Law of Cause and Effect(Causality). Further, it says Laws of LOGIC. Not Cause and Effect, LOGIC.
So that dog also don't hunt.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
One in the same -
I'm not telling you what they deal with, i'm telling you what it is. It is cause and effect -
Example: If someone is logical then they are putting 2 and 2 together, that is they can see that when X does something it has an effect on Y -
All of math is cause and effect which in essence is logic -
Arguments are logic and when broken down are math and thus cause and effect
pheonex 2 years ago
@pheonex
"I'm not telling you what they deal with, i'm telling you what it is."
^^^You appear to be confused. What is my clock? It's plastic. What is a school? It's often a brick structure. What is this piece of paper? A material made of cellulose pulp derived mainly from wood or rags or certain grasses.
What are the Laws of Logic? You telling me they are cause and effect is wrong. Not only because the very title of Laws of LOGIC show otherwise, but that doesn't say WHAT they are.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
Um no, because they are no physical, unlike the examples you gave.
It's like you asking what are the laws of physics and then comparing it to saying what is a school, it's made of bricks.
In fact if anything a school is a place of learning, it doesn't matter what its physical makeup is but rather it is associated with being a place of learning. It could be in a park, anyway that is besides the point. The fact remains the law of logic is not a physical thing, rather a conceptual reality.
pheonex 2 years ago
Further you saying what is my clock - answering it is plastic is stupid. If you asked what is the clock made of, then plastic, what is a clock, it is a device which tells the time. What are the laws of logic they are laws which dictate how the universe works, they are made up of exclusively of cause and effect.
Your examples are rather stupid tbh, Definitions incorporate the function of the *thing*.
definition clock - "measure the time or duration of an event or action"
pheonex 2 years ago
Look to summarize -
Logic is a form of reasoning which uses at its basis cause and effect to come to its conclusions.
To say a clock is simply plastic is stupid, rather it is a device which tells the time is a much better description of a clock.
Remember the function of the thing goes in a definition, not what it is litterly made of. A school is a place of learning not just a building made of bricks, otherwise using that LOGIC i could say my home is a school...i mean it is made of bricks 0.o
pheonex 2 years ago
@pheonex
A) When I ask "WHAT" something is, I'm referring to it's compositional nature.
B) The Laws of Logic are not about cause and effect, that why it's called the Laws of LOGIC, and not the Laws of Causality.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
Fine just like physics, the laws of logic are in its composition nature simply a conceptual idea. Happy?
And no, the laws of Causality does make up the law of logic.
I dunno i may be wrong, but at least thats what out professor of philosophy has described it as :p I'm going to believe him over you tbh
pheonex 2 years ago
@pheonex
"I'm going to believe him over you tbh"
^^^Of course you will. From what I've seen of you, it's not surprising you would parrot and ape what someone else told you at school. Hahahahaha! Not surprising you would rather have someone else think for you, and control your positions, rather than thinking for yourself. Hahaha!
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
Um are you trying to argue the point that one should simply think shit up from thin air rather then learn it at university?
I guess your one of those people that couldn't get into uni/college and then decided that it would be a waste of time anyway ah :s
Ok you, being a highly decorated philosopher must be right... :s
pheonex 2 years ago
@pheonex
"argue the point that one should simply think shit up from thin air rather then learn it at university?"
^^^I like the gutter mouth cursing above.
It's so dignified and academic. Did you learn that in college? Hahahaha!
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
Comment removed
pheonex 2 years ago
Ok now your off topic and just trying to argue for the sake of arguing on youtube, now is about the time you should start thinking about getting a life tbh.
Lol you keyboard warrior! Very tough from behind a keyboard well done ;)
I'm glad you got lol's from the word "shit" instead of actually making a decent reply as to why i shouldn't listen to my professor 0.o.
Whatever i have answered you question so cbf replying to your now worthless arguments.
pheonex 2 years ago
@pheonex
"Ok now your off topic and just trying to argue for the sake of arguing on youtube, now is about the time you should start thinking about getting a life tbh."
^^^Worthless negativity and insults.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
Are you aware that Newtonian physics are not deterministic?
mortemdei 2 years ago
Regarding scientiific inaccuracy, there are no observed singularities. Singulariteis are mathemtacal phenomena which result from failings in theoretical frameworks.
bpabbott1st 2 years ago
"Regarding scientiific inaccuracy, there are no observed singularities. Singulariteis are mathemtacal phenomena which result from failings in theoretical frameworks. "
Perhaps a singularity isn't the best way to describe it. At the first instanton of time, we don't know what the conditions of the universe are like. All we know is that everything can be traced back to a universe of infintessimal size.
UNFFwildcard 2 years ago
The begining of what we see is interesting. While what we see today traces back to something that fit is a very small size (small enough that our understanding of physics falls apart --- thus the singularity), it is the observable universe that is finite today and very small 13.7 Byrs ago. The size of the entire universe is unknowable, but has no limit (like an infinite string, or a closed loop of string).
bpabbott1st 2 years ago
This series looks quite good UNFF . I've always thought of you as one of the most honest Christians on YT , and while I'm agnostic , I always take away something from your vids .
ComradeAgopian 2 years ago
@UNFFwildcard
Your made up God can't do anything, since it lacks a primary attribute. This is proven by the corollary of the contrary. Since the human concept of "NOTHING". lacks a primary attribute. That's why it's "NOTHING". So your made up God can't be creator of anything.
Something immaterial cannot love, decide, reason, create, or know anything, since it doesn't have the kinetic potential to instantiate such actualities.
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
I'm a creationist, but not in the sense of most. I am a creationist in the sense that evolution can work and there is no need to fear it. Neocreationist if I might say. Also believe in the big bang theory. I also believe in the Universe being over 15 billion years old. it's dogmatic to take Genisis literal. "A well spoken word is like golden Apples on a dish," A word within a word within a word.
kaneose 2 years ago
Thanks for the food of thought. Also thanks for the beautiful images.
NathanWubs 2 years ago
UNFFWildcard: Look up the idea of Compatibilism.
Juggernauticali 2 years ago
Interesting stuff, good video!
BJOEYAK 2 years ago
The series should prove to be very interesting.
PragmaticHeathen 2 years ago
Anyways, I'm looking forward to this series. I hope you can post videos on a regular basis=)
TwilightAronXD 2 years ago
Great stuff, but who was the musician?
Stitchman3875 2 years ago
This would help explain alot to me. I grew up a christian, but have come to not believe alot of it, yet still believe in God.
dannukesem 2 years ago
Glad to see the vid :)
Always happy to hear a Christian I can take seriously.
Teirusu155 2 years ago
Why can't you just do a science series?
I have yet to understand why rational people would beliebe in something that CAN NOT be verified...
TwilightAronXD 2 years ago
Can you verify whether or not it is irrational for people to believe in something that cannot be verified?
UNFFwildcard 2 years ago
So according to myself I'm irrational because I can't verify that it is irrational to believe in things that cannot be verified? Was that your point?
MY point: I don't understand why people would spend so much time understanding something that doesen't exist in our reality. Does it really matter?
TwilightAronXD 2 years ago
" I can't verify that it is irrational to believe in things that cannot be verified?"
As you know, due to your plethora of scientific knowledge, you wouild rightly known that science is bound by a dynamic process called methodological naturalism, which by definition, cannot comment on the existence of the supernatural. God cannot be tested, it's ultimately a metaphysical question. As for science, it's a slave to philosophy and cannot account for a multitude of things in the universe
TheIrrationalAtheist 2 years ago
You are missing my point. I wasn't talking about the scientific method exclusively, but reason in general.
If our senses are bound to the NATUARL world, why would we try to understand the SUPER-NATURAL world? It doesen't make sense.
TwilightAronXD 2 years ago
"why would we try to understand the SUPER-NATURAL world?"
Do you care about Truth? Whether there is a mind behind this universe? What about life after death, if one's soul does not end at the grave, but continues to live..? He ultimately has everything to gain, and everything to lose. What will you wager?
TheIrrationalAtheist 2 years ago
I'm not going to repeat myself over and over. I didn't mention any of the things you listed above. I made only ONE point and I repeated it 3 times...
UNFFwildcard wants people to question these things, as he said in the video. I'm not trolling! I'm just brining up what I consider to be a valid point.
TwilightAronXD 2 years ago
"Whether there is a mind behind this universe?"
Why use the word 'mind?' Minds emerge from brain firings. Isn't it arrogant limit the the power of God to a clump of neurons, like we humans have?
Juggernauticali 2 years ago
Oh really? I was sure the mind was metaphysical, as most philosophers would agree. If it was actually physical, how much does the mind weight, how long is it, where is it located, how much do thoughts weigh? God is immaterial, just like the mind
TheIrrationalAtheist 2 years ago
@Russ
watch?v=Mu5Zsjs3QYk
^^^Straight truth 4:26-4:33
Get dominated Russ
Aaronk > Russ
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
"If it was actually physical, how much does the mind weight, how long is it, where is it located, how much do thoughts weigh?"
These are meaningless questions. "Mind" is a word, a mere concept, not a thing or entity. We use it to describe consciousness, which emerges from the brain.
"God is immaterial"
Need God be immaterial? Could God not be the forces of nature?
Juggernauticali 2 years ago
@Juggernauticali
"Need God be immaterial? Could God not be the forces of nature?"
^^^Need Bumba the Bushongo God, be immaterial? Could Bumba the Bushongo God, not be the forces of nature?
Hahahaha!
Dhorpatan 2 years ago
i like your attitude and im looking forward to the rest of the series.
932016 2 years ago
bec he said "god does not play dice" but Neils Bohr said "stop telling god what to do with his dice" The subatomic particles in an atom change behavior when viewing them, which is a type of cause and effect, sure, and a predictability. but not an absolute.
DecentralizedByGuilt 2 years ago
Problem one. You're using outdated theories that existed before quantum mechanics. We now know that the universe is not a machine, and there are no set rules. Einstein's theory of light particles led to quantum mechanics. Einstein himself hated quantum mechanics,
DecentralizedByGuilt 2 years ago
Yea, it's about Quantum Mechanics he said:
''I don't believe God was playing dice''
TwilightAronXD 2 years ago
I'm excited for this man. Like your stuff!
After watching Theologica37's latest vid, I think it's fairly easy to establish that whatever caused the universe is a timeless, all-powerful brute fact.
But HOW do we establish that the brute fact is a person, with a will and intelligence?
Please, if you could answer this...
I was also curious, what is your background, what do you do?
vbfl920 2 years ago
Excellent! I will jump on any opportunity to debate you. So far I have nothing to object to, except perhaps that I don't really find the indeterministic nature of the universe to be an argument for or against a God. My intuition tells me that if God exist, he would not be limited to what can be determined and unless you want to attribute free will to the indeterminable fluctuations of particles it doesn't really change anything about the argument of free will. I will follow this with interest!
TheLittleDonkey 2 years ago
Good stuff! Looking forward to more. I appreciate your attitude.
ofpfury 2 years ago
Interesting stuff. So far so good. :)
Gnug215 2 years ago