Will you guys please test it with a Source Game like Team Fortress 2 or Portal 2?
Also, I would like to see you guys use lower end hardware, such as a GTX 460 or GTX 260.
And maybe a quality and performance comparison between No Anti-Aliasing, MSAA, and FXAA. And I am not just talking about 2x MSAA either. I mean something like 8x MSAA. That's what I use. The only reason I am not using FXAA is because I don't know how to get it to work on my DX10 card or with Source Games.
@CRimsonEagleX So? Higher number does not equal massive improvement. The GTX 260 Core 216 still plays most games high, and sometimes very high at more than playable Framerates at 1600 x900.
@delicieuxz It is better than MSAA and FSAA. FSAA is especially bad when it comes to blurring textures.
FXAA actually has less blur than MSAA, and of course less Aliasing and higher performance.
@swxwingalliance The only reason they are using GTX 570s is because high-end Graphics Cards are good for Benchmarking, and also because they are relatively new compared to somelike such as a 460. Though it wouldn't hurt if they tried using 460s instead of 570. They would get more modest results.
@Amaroqdricaldari In addition, FXAA is natively designed for DX11. They could port it to DX9 or OpenGL 2.0, but it is hard to do that, and the quality wouldn't be as good. That is why they are using GTX 570s.
Everybody is acting like experts because they read something on a forum. I dont think EVGA got to where they are today by being stupid. Kudos to Nvidia and EVGA for being INNOVATIVE and trying new things.
im playing this game on my Late 2008 15" Macbook pro on all hi setting and all im using a is a 9600mGT 512MB and 8GB of DDR 3 ram intel core 2 duo 2.66Ghz and iv had no issues with lagging great game
@evgaonthetube I have a question about this vs. regular anti aliasing, (I'll be going from console to PC when the next gen consoles come so I have little experience with this level of PC gaming) When I play games on my PC I can get for example 90 FPS with regular AA off and when i go AAx2 I get like 30 FPS. How does FXAA manage to keep the FPS drop down? I find it pretty awesome and I'm just very curious.
@evgaonthetube you guys do realize that 1080P doesn't work on normal monitors, you either have to have a HD monitor or one that has a resolution of 1080P
@evgaonthetube True... but YouTube compression makes 1080p content look more like 720p content; then since it's running at the native res., it looks dreadful, and you can't tell the difference.
With 'any' game, the only way you'll be able to tell the true difference with anything, is by playing it directly yourself.
@evgaonthetube Then the examples given by EVGA here is way off. There is barly a difference, and there is nothing in my eyes saying it's for the better.
Wow... I forgot how bad the vanilla textures are in skyrim...
stinkkingstink1 2 weeks ago
Oh no that cheese would look all jagged and ruin every thing oh how I need an nVidia GPU again.
MrGamingAddiction 1 month ago
omg what is the music it is good 8O
EvilN00ber 1 month ago
Damm you evga now i have to go play skyrim I have school tomorrow for god sake
Hairdification 1 month ago
Sadly, FXAA also makes things less sharp. I don't really like the blur FXAA produces in games with deferred rendering.
strikerk 1 month ago
i'd much rather see bigger textures in Skyrim
joby92 1 month ago
when you mean Fxaa off do you have the anti-aliasing on? and when you mean fxaa on do you have anti-aliasing off?
davidalex712 2 months ago
Unfortunately, it doesnt fix the sharp edges around shadows.
213374ju 2 months ago
@213374ju Your right. That my friend, is called shading.
CRimsonEagleX 2 months ago
haha im just worried about getting a graphics card
fundude248 3 months ago
Looking for aliasing on objects.. Just another thing on the endless list of things to do in Skyrim..
RoyLFewkes 3 months ago
Pick something other then skyrim, the graphics suck in that game.
JustinUSA 3 months ago
Will you guys please test it with a Source Game like Team Fortress 2 or Portal 2?
Also, I would like to see you guys use lower end hardware, such as a GTX 460 or GTX 260.
And maybe a quality and performance comparison between No Anti-Aliasing, MSAA, and FXAA. And I am not just talking about 2x MSAA either. I mean something like 8x MSAA. That's what I use. The only reason I am not using FXAA is because I don't know how to get it to work on my DX10 card or with Source Games.
Amaroqdricaldari 3 months ago
@Amaroqdricaldari GTX 260 may be getting old, but it's not low end by any means.
CoolKabbage 2 months ago
@CoolKabbage don't lie... cmon man, theres the 600 series comming out. WOOWHOO
CRimsonEagleX 2 months ago
@CRimsonEagleX So? Higher number does not equal massive improvement. The GTX 260 Core 216 still plays most games high, and sometimes very high at more than playable Framerates at 1600 x900.
CoolKabbage 2 months ago
FXAA makes the game crash
v1ncn7 3 months ago
FXAA makes the textures become blurry. Better to have sharp textures and some jaggies than blurry textures and a bit less jaggies.
delicieuxz 3 months ago
@delicieuxz It is better than MSAA and FSAA. FSAA is especially bad when it comes to blurring textures.
FXAA actually has less blur than MSAA, and of course less Aliasing and higher performance.
@swxwingalliance The only reason they are using GTX 570s is because high-end Graphics Cards are good for Benchmarking, and also because they are relatively new compared to somelike such as a 460. Though it wouldn't hurt if they tried using 460s instead of 570. They would get more modest results.
Amaroqdricaldari 3 months ago
@Amaroqdricaldari In addition, FXAA is natively designed for DX11. They could port it to DX9 or OpenGL 2.0, but it is hard to do that, and the quality wouldn't be as good. That is why they are using GTX 570s.
Amaroqdricaldari 3 months ago
the difference is very noticable...still it's far from perfect as the edges become quite blurry I see in this vid
adhdconjo 3 months ago
gtx 570 was used if watched it said so
chad1073 3 months ago
@chad1073 2 X Gtx 570
swxwingalliance 3 months ago
which GPU was used for this video?
struggle375 3 months ago
Why would 2 people dislike this? Probably AMD users, and/or console gamers.
RalphCQ 3 months ago
@RalphCQ look up "The Fox and the Grapes" on wikipedia - the first paragraph explains exactly why 2 people disliked.
YouFailEpic 3 months ago
Not sure what "crazy blur" some of you are seeing. Real life uses it all the time. It does a great job with AA, and benchmark comparisons agree.
thepaledeath 3 months ago
What's the point of this if the game has been out for like two weeks and has had the option since then?
Not to mention FXAA makes the game blurry so using 8x MSAA is much better.
yvese 3 months ago
I run fxaa off because I use FXAA Injector mod.
Threefiddyz 3 months ago
NVIDIA XFXAASDADSEX
iHeLIBOY 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Everybody is acting like experts because they read something on a forum. I dont think EVGA got to where they are today by being stupid. Kudos to Nvidia and EVGA for being INNOVATIVE and trying new things.
boostfreak777 3 months ago
while FXAA is nice, there is ofc better AA i'd rather use that doesn't go crazy with the blur.
randyzie 3 months ago
Should have shown the difference from other kinds of AA instead of the difference between on and off....
xin0710 3 months ago
Is there shipping for a B stock item and how much?
FedoraFTW 3 months ago
Is FXAA compatible with 200-series ?
SonsOfHateSphere 3 months ago
@SonsOfHateSphere Probably not.
RalphCQ 3 months ago
Too bad Skyrim is a generic, poorly made, overrated pile of steaming bethesda shit.
NiGHTSChao689 3 months ago
hey EVGA or ANYBODY, If i buy a B stock item can i buy a warranty for it?
FedoraFTW 3 months ago
@FedoraFTW thanks :)
OMGitsSCHNUCKUMS 3 months ago
Is there a way to activate it in BF3?
ArgonVII 3 months ago
@ArgonVII The "Anti-aliasing Post" option is FXAA.
ChaosBahamut 3 months ago
How did you guys make the shadows look normal instead of saw blades?
ProtectionDirect 3 months ago
It is noticeable even on 360p.. you guys either trying to be characteristic or simply blind.
othman626 3 months ago 22
@othman626
you are right!
grayisagirl 3 months ago
not only noticeable, is obviously noticeable
grayisagirl 3 months ago
im playing this game on my Late 2008 15" Macbook pro on all hi setting and all im using a is a 9600mGT 512MB and 8GB of DDR 3 ram intel core 2 duo 2.66Ghz and iv had no issues with lagging great game
iphonepunker 3 months ago
@evgaonthetube I have a question about this vs. regular anti aliasing, (I'll be going from console to PC when the next gen consoles come so I have little experience with this level of PC gaming) When I play games on my PC I can get for example 90 FPS with regular AA off and when i go AAx2 I get like 30 FPS. How does FXAA manage to keep the FPS drop down? I find it pretty awesome and I'm just very curious.
OMGitsSCHNUCKUMS 3 months ago
@OMGitsSCHNUCKUMS It's a post processing effect, so that helps keep the framerate from dropping.
dchains 3 months ago
I wish I spent more of my 24hrs playtime staring endlessly at small objects to find jaggered edges than having fun on the game :(
aRiflip 3 months ago
You'll notice a difference when you're using 3D Vision glasses! Nvidia FTW.
DvDPlaya 3 months ago
just like in bf3, it makes everything too blurry.
jsnyara 3 months ago
looks good evga
Grechieman 3 months ago
@CinnabarCrux The difference is more evident when watching in 1080P and Fullscreen. (as you would see it playing the game)
evgaonthetube 3 months ago 53
@evgaonthetube I have AA as high as it will go in games but I still see jaggies.
LLOYD19851012 3 months ago
@evgaonthetube you guys do realize that 1080P doesn't work on normal monitors, you either have to have a HD monitor or one that has a resolution of 1080P
shuffle953 3 months ago
@evgaonthetube True... but YouTube compression makes 1080p content look more like 720p content; then since it's running at the native res., it looks dreadful, and you can't tell the difference.
With 'any' game, the only way you'll be able to tell the true difference with anything, is by playing it directly yourself.
AmH032uTuBe 3 months ago
@evgaonthetube Then the examples given by EVGA here is way off. There is barly a difference, and there is nothing in my eyes saying it's for the better.
perrrry 3 months ago
@evgaonthetube not exactly because youtube compresses the video.
StellarMoig 3 months ago
@evgaonthetube it would only be the same if you guys' uploaded it in original quality.
StellarMoig 3 months ago
@evgaonthetube Agreed. And even more noticeable at 2560x1600! FXAA rocks at 30".
3Z3K13L08 3 months ago
@evgaonthetube It isn't worth it....the game doesn't utilize the full power of that card because the graphical barrier to entry is low.
akumous 3 months ago
@evgaonthetube i still see it quite well and i must say, it looks great with it on, cant wait to get a new graphics card!
DaBurntToaster 3 months ago
@evgaonthetube ok i really dont see the difference in my game.maybe cause i have an amd graphics card?
mario441797 1 week ago
@CinnabarCrux Try watching in 1080p. The overall image appears sharper, crisper, and smoother with FXAA enabled.
Razear 3 months ago
How can i use FXAA on my Skyrim copy?
3Target33 3 months ago