Plan for Nigeria climate change commission sparks debate – papers
.
A Nigerian environmental group has urged the country’s president, GoodLuck Jonathan, not to sign into law a bill creating a climate change commission in the country, saying this would steer focus away from other environmental issues, the Daily Trust newspaper reported on Friday.
No, no. Bush, that's an idiot, a real dumb f*ck. He simply lacks intelligence, really embarrassing to america to have had him for 8 years. Can't even compare him to Gore. And conservatives like Limbaugh defend him through all his screwups, and mocked Gore for stuff like this.
I mean, stuff like this doesn't even register with me any more, after the kind of stuff Bush pulled.
@gunseng2 o dear god your such a typical democrat.. bash the republican and have no facts nothing to back up what your saying.. just words and ignorance.. no clue on common sense no clue how the government should run just thinks the republicans are wrong cause "mommy and daddy said so" please... gore is a textbook hypocrite only interested in making his huge paycheck and keeping his power spot
@anewillss Actually, I'm not a democrat, and my mommy and daddy doesn't wage a personal crusade against the republicans. And I am educated in politics, so I would say that I have a way better idea on how government should run than you have.
But even if you're a republican, you can't defend Bush. Ask a Reagan-question. Are you better off now than you were 10 years ago? Do you feel safer than you felt 10 years ago? Is the economy better than it was 10 years ago? No. Bush failed miserably.
@anewillss You know what, tell me something. Where did Bush succeed? How is america better after him? He got america stuck in two wars, which both costs hundreds of billions. At least one of which was totally unnecessary. Both of these wars create alot more terrorists than they kill. He wrecked the economy with huge deficits, finishing with a global economic crisis. He made the entire world hate the US. He seemed dumb. He refused to make a serious effort to solve climate change, and it goes on..
@gunseng2 You will find out how much you will miss Bush after the "Bush Tax Cuts" are illiminated by your buddy marxist. If you think Bush created a deficit in 8yrs, try looking at what your marxist buddy has done in 2yrs. (he trippled it). But I guess thats ok with you, because a democrat did it, right? cont....
@MrOTLChamp The kind of rhetoric that calls democrats marxists or socialists is simply retarded. There is no socialism in the US and there is no left in the US, there's only the right and the more right.
Why should we keep a giant tax cut for the rich in times of crisis? Trickle-down doesn't work, those tax cuts have made the rich more rich and the poor more poor.
And yeah, Obama has spent tons of money to repair the US economy after Bush f*cked it up. He had to try and do something to clean
@gunseng2 ....cont. And your marxist buddy had a chance to end the wars, and chose not to. The Afganistan war is now all his. But, I guess thats ok with you also because hes a democrat. Open your eyes, sheep. And global warming is a fraud, so there is no need to do anything about it.
@MrOTLChamp up the mess that Bush left. There's also a lot more that's f*cked up in the US, like health care and the lack of welfare, those issues have to be addressed in order to make the US great again. The difference between Obamas spending and Bushs spending is that he threw money away at unnecessary stuff, like his personal grudge with Iraq and tax cuts to make the rich more rich. Obama is spending money where it matters, in health care and to repair the economy. Obama at least spends smart
@gunseng2 You're a total idiot to think obama has done anything for the US. Wellfare is what we need to cut, not add too. Has wellfare ever made any country more profitable? No! Of course not. It's impossible. Wellfare is killing our country. Just look at what the illegal aliens cost California. Over 30 billion a year. Cont....
@MrOTLChamp Why would we need to cut welfare, what kind of country do you want? An improved economy and a better welfare goes hand in hand. If the middle and lower class have more money they spend it at key businesses,they buy things they need to live. If money is concentrated amongst the super-rich they pile it on and spend less in times of crisis. If poor people get money they spend it, which will boost businesses and create more jobs
But above all better welfare makes for a happier population
@gunseng2 Dead wrong on better welfare. If you have better welfare, then you will naturally get more people on it. More people on welfare means more money taken from the people who matter (the people doing all the work). Welfare is like a vacuum, it keeps sucking more losers into the system. It's an incentive NOT to work, PERIOD.
@gunseng2 ....cont. It's a typical socialist program, and we don't need it. People need to take responsibility for themselves rather than milking the system. Why should we give money to people NOT willing to work when the money could be spent on better programs such as building roads, parks, and libraries? Cont....
@MrOTLChamp What u need to realize is that to have a free, capitalist society one must have a social saftey net that is relatively non-porous. In capitalism it is invitable (and even desriable) for business to go belly up (it frees up resources for better uses). That will inevitable cause a lack of economic opportunity for some and unemployment for others – out of no fault of their own. So, no poverty is not the result of not tyring, it’s a natural side-effect of capitalism.
@DoseOneIsJesus " What u need to realize is that to have a free, capitalist society one must have a social saftey net that is relatively non-porous"
Really? You're kidding right? That is a socialist statement. It's socialism that instills the social saftey net.
" In capitalism it is invitable (and even desriable) for business to go belly up" What? Says who? That is a rediculious statement. I think we will just let that one go due to ignorrants. Cont....
@MrOTLChamp Its kinda hard to take you're opinion seriously when you cant even spell at a 4rth grade level ie. ridiculous*, safety*, ignorance* not ignorrants lol. I always find it kinda funny when some1 mispells or mispronounces the word ignorance when they're trying to call some1 else ignorant. It seems like u just like to label things as "socialism" or "typical democrat way of thinking" when they're really coming from a capitalist point of view. You try to twist things around and...cont
@MrOTLChamp trying to be slick but i see through your jedi mind tricks. Right after i said " What u need to realize is that to have a free, capitalist society one must have a social saftey net that is relatively non-porous" I go on to explain why this is necessary for the rise of capitalism. "In capitalism it is invetable (and even desirable) for business to go belly up (it frees up resources for better uses)." When that business goes belly up its not lazy, unemployed, illegal aliens...cont
@DoseOneIsJesus Correction - Welfare is not necessary for the rise of capitolism. Its needed because many hard working americans become unemployed as a direct result of capitolism.
@DoseOneIsJesus Kind of ironic, that you bitch and complain about grammer, then turn around and spell capitalism like "capitolism" twice in the same paragraph. LMAO. :) Nice one.
@MrOTLChamp who are in need of wellfare. Its hard working americans who contribute to society on a daily basis. Now you can label that as whatever you want but it doesnt change the fact that we(when i say we im referring to hard working americans) need welfare to progress and keep poverty at a minimal level
@DoseOneIsJesus " So, no poverty is not the result of not tyring, it’s a natural side-effect of capitalism."
Are you trying to tell me that there is a socialist country out there that doesn't have poverty? LMAO Again idiotic to think that socialism works. Look at China. A total socialist, communist country. Their poverty is far worse because of the control of the government. Not the people. Altimately a socialist country becomes a totalitarian government. Now you have poverty
@MrOTLChamp So in conclusion, no, im not trying to tell you that there is a socialist country out there that doesnt have poverty. You pulled that ASSumption out of your own ass. What i AM trying to tell you is that this isn't about socialism vs whatever you label yourself as. This is about helping out your fellow hard working americans when they're down on their luck. Poverty is inevitable. What you have to realize is most of the people in poverty are there as a direct result of capitalism.
@DoseOneIsJesus " most of the people in poverty are there as a direct result of capitalism."
Then how do you explain China having such a high degree of poverty if the cause is capitalism?
Capitalism creates an opportunity to make something of yourself, unlike socialism, which elliminates the opportunity to become succesful. Wheres the incentive to do anything? Why work when others will work and you can reap the benifits of their efforts? Cont....
....cont. Why do you think America became such a great nation that so many people are willing to risk their life just to get here? I have never heard of anyone risking their life to get to China ot the UK. Your aguement is completely unfounded.
@MrOTLChamp My arguement is just as strong as it was before u tried to twist ait around. I never said capitalism was the only cause of poverty. And truthfully i dont really give a fuck about poverty in China. Im talking about America. In America capitalism is a big cause of poverty. Its set up for the people on top to stay on top and the people on bottome to stay on bottom. The only people that benefit from capitalism are rich, greedy, motherfuckers like you. Not the average HARD WORKING... cont
@DoseOneIsJesus Capitalism is not set up for only the rich to succeed. It's set up so that everyone has an opportunity to succeed. Many of the rich people started off as poor and became rich, others had earlier family members who made it rich and was able to give to their siblings. In herintance even comes from someone else's success. Something you probably never heard of in a socialist country. You have only the rights the government grants you in a socialist system. You're just a number.
@MrOTLChamp Actually if u read my last two comments i spelled it CAPITALISM. At the end of the day as long as i dont spell ignorance ignorants im good to go. That was one of the most epic fail ive ever seen. Mind as well have called me ignant lol. But lets not get sidetracked. You keep bringing this back to socialism vs capitalism. Thats not what this is about. Ive already explained what this is about but apparently you have horrible reading comprehension skills. Im done talking to brick walls
@DoseOneIsJesus Oh I'm sorry. were you at the end of a hard day? So sorry, And yes this about Capitalism v. Socialism. You keep referring to Capitalism being a failure, as if anything else would be different from socialism. Capitalism doesn't bread more welfare, liberalism does.
@MrOTLChamp No im actually at the beginning of a beautiful day. The thing is welfare isnt the problem. Ive already explained this to you many times over. Welfare is the SOLUTION to the problem that capitalism has created aka poverty.
Ps. Spelling and grammar are two totally different things smart one. Have a nice day=)
@DoseOneIsJesus So, taking money from hard working Americans and giving it to the lazy welfare people such as yourself is going to fix everything. What a liberal piece of shit, leach you are. Good luck with that philosophy. Moron.
@DoseOneIsJesus You keep saying that it's capitalism that creates poverty, yet, all countries have poverty, and socialist countries such as China, N. Korea have a much higher poverty rate than America, Isreal, or Japan, which are the main capitalist countries. Your arguement has nothing to back it up.
@DoseOneIsJesus Your lack of anything to say shows you still have nothing. Come back when you're more educated on what you're talking about. Saying stupid shit like Capitalism causes poverty. LMAO Name any other system that gives the poor an opportunity to get rich.
@MrOTLChamp Americans. But at the same time i dont necessarily think socialism is the answer. Truthfully i think the answer lies somewhere between capitalism and socialism. I just dont see how this nation will ever b able to come to a compromise when we have people just as hard headed and greedy as you calling the shots. Ppl like u dont care about the negative effects of capitalism because they dont effect you. All u see are the positive effects while hard working americans are being ... cont
@MrOTLChamp thrown under the bus to find themselves and their families in a deep shithole aka poverty. But as long as it doesnt effect you who cares right? We cant survive as a nation if everyone is only thinking about themselves. It just doesnt work like that. Capitalism only benefits the top 1% of the upper class. Why do you think that top 1% is even referred to as the CAPITALIST Class. Think about it buddy. We help out the top 1% that doesnt even need any help & leave the other 99% to...cont
And I don't know where you got your information on America falling behind in science. America is still one of the leading countries in science, space travel medicine, etc, etc, etc. And if you think America is all screwed up because of the republicans you have another thing wrong.(probably because you don't live here and have no clue) Cont....
@gunseng2 ....cont. Our economy is failing because of socialist programs created by the democrates. The main program that has affected our economy is a program that was pushed by democrates insisting that everyone should own a home. When they lowered the standard to buy a house when Clinton was in office. Cont....
@gunseng2 cont.... They started loaning money to people that didn't qualify, therefore all those loans started going bad and houses were falling into foreclosure. This created a domino effect and lots of other people who did qualify lost their home as well. The construction industry came to a screeching halt, which affects about 1/3 of our business.
@gunseng2 ....cont. California has a shortfall of 19 billion. Huh? That means the illegal aliens are bankrupting California. But a left-wing nut-job can't see that because it wouldn't be "politicaly correct" Bushes tax cuts are a big deal, just wait until obama cuts them. It will slow the economy even more. I've never got a job from a poor person, have you? No! Go learn about the economy before you try and persuade someone who has run a corporation for 20 yrs.
Why do you think america is so corrupt and falls behind on science and all other aspects of society except defence spendings? It's because the nations priorities are f*cked up. The US is no longer a great nation, the people aren't happy and the politics are dominated by the usual republican agenda of war and economic crisis. The country has lost its way. Look to for example the scandinavian model, something between the US and that would make the state, the economy and society a lot stronger.
— The increasing acidity of the world's oceans -- and that acidity's growing threat to marine species -- are definitive proof that the atmospheric carbon dioxide that is causing climate change is also negatively affecting the marine environment...
...says Antarctic marine biologist Jim McClintock, Ph.D., professor in the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Department of Biology.
Arctic ice melting could cost global agriculture, real estate and insurance anywhere from $US2.4 trillion ($2.8 billion) to $US24 trillion by 2050 in damage from rising sea levels, floods and heat waves, according to a report released on Friday.
You're 69 year old stalker. Youre a global warming DENIER with no peer-reviewed science so all you can do is play silly games. Further proof global warming deniers are frauds
@Niightversionn Quit impersonating me all over youtube, Spitfiremacx AKA N ii ghtversionn Nigh tt versionn Knigh tt vision Nigtversionn Nightver ss ion, Nigh ttt versionn Nightversio m Nightverslon, Nightversio nnn, etc.. Stalker, impersonator, global warming DENIER. What an imbecile
Al Gore was one of the architects of two of the most anti-American, anti-human rights, & anti-environmental legislation in the history of the United States. He was in office when NAFTA & GATT expansion to the WTO happened.
Multiple tens of millions of jobs that paid good wages were shipped to Al Gore's Marxist friends in China & the third world so that corporations who greased Gore's pockets could exploit the Environment & Human Rights & stuff their fat pockets with money
The fact that he uses junk science and misunderstandings about global warming and cooling periods of the Earth to bend to his own propaganda. This is exactly what Hitler did, and not only do Republicans not like Al Gore any intelligent Scientist that knows about Meteorology in general despises him.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Oh so Republicans hate him because he advocates not ignoring science and criticizes our self destructive activities like driving hummers. Thanks for helping me understand this.
"advocates". His graphs have over a 800 year lag from global temperatures and CO2. You want to know why? Because the majority of CO2 comes from the Ocean. When it gets warmer, more CO2 gets released from oceans, when it gets colder less CO2 releases from the ocean. The reason for the 800 year lag is that it takes so long for the oceans to warm and cool because they are so big and deep. He claims that CO2 drives climate when it's the opposite.
@JacobR248 2 thumbs up for that comment... Every reputable scientist that read his "peace prize winning paper" said it was total bull shit he just uses it to further himself.. he uses more energy in a month than families do in a year.. he can fly around in his jet and preach to us that we shouldnt drive.. he'll eat steak but tell us its wrong.. he's clearly the definition of hypocrite along with the rest of the democratic party!
... well because Republicans hate it when stupid people come into power. For example. Al gore, and Clinton number one. and you are another fine example of a stupid person.
Back in the 80's Gore was called an Atari Democrat. It's what we jokingly called fiscally conservative Democrats who believed funding technology was more important than welfare.
Gore created the High Performance Computing and Communication Act of 1991 which created the internet.
Pundits made fun of him when it was a new idea, while he was pushing it through and now they claim he didn't do it.
How does one even get their fucking application looked at with a 1206 for Yale... Oh yea, his dad got him in...
Bush is a fucking moron, bottom line. He has his faith and loyalties in Oil and big business, and thats it! And, yes there is Man caused global warming from volcanos and the tilt of the earth and others, but never before has the earth suffered from the shit were doing to it. If you cant understand that, your a dumb ass. Clinton was better!
I can't believe you try using SAT scores to compare Gore and Bush. If you actually think that Gore is a reliable source and that Clinton was a better president, then you are a very ignorant person. You don't know the first thing about Bush, Clinton, Gore, or global warming.
Ok, the man was a bad business owner with oil in texas having to sell it, then bought the baseball team, and had to sell that, then was governor and put texas in debt really badly, texas also became listed as the top polluted state while he was governor. The man distorted the truth to get us into was with iraq. Changing his reasons like changing underwear, almost everyone is under investigation, he has doubled the debt, education is down, the economy is down, jobs are down...
The economy began its decline because Clinton set up programs so that they would end when his term in office ended. In fact, the debt was rising before Clinton got out of office. Bush made the largest tax cut in history, he had to endure 9/11 and the most costly natural disaster this country has ever seen. He was lied to by several of our allies, which is why we went to Iraq. Iraq wasn't a total loss. We helped the people over there and it is still helpful for us to be in Iraq.
Wow, you obviously have very little understanding of macroeconomics. Firstly, your conspiracy regarding Clinton is irrelevant. What has Bush done to repair the economy regardless of the cause? You propose tax cuts. A tax cut is nothing more than a redistribution of wealth. This is no practical solution to repairing an economy. The former secretary of state advised Bush the invasion of Iraq would be a mistake and was based on questionable intelligence.
I understand macroeconomics, but clearly you do not. Tax cuts are not a redistribution of wealth. Every time a democrat gets into office, their solution is to increase the tax burden on large corporations, make it difficult for businesses to thrive, and raise taxes for everyone. A tax cut can actually provide an economic boost, but that may be difficult for you to understand.
I study economics and some moron from Youtube claiming to know more than myself hardly hurts my feels. As I said, taxes only redistribute wealth. Read any book on economics and you will understand. It's humoring how many arrogant yet uneducated kids lurk on here.
The best way to help our economy would be to reduce the tax burden on corporations. New businesses have difficulty starting up because of high taxes, and corporations are moving over seas because the costs have become too high for them to remain in the country. As for the secretary of state saying the invasion would be a mistake, that is only one man's opinion. I believe going into Iraq was necessary.
You never referred to corporate tax before. Maybe you should speak a little more clearly. If Bush is doing such a great job cutting corporate tax (which you have claimed has HAS done) then why is a 39% tax rate on 100k-335k gross income? The purpose of the secretary of state is to advise the president concerning foreign affairs. They receive all eminent report concerning foreign affairs. Only a fool would neglect someone as informed as the sec of state.
I find it fascinating how you miss-quote me. I said that Bush had performed the largest tax cut in American history, but I never said that he reduced Corporate taxes. I said that we need to reduce Corporate taxes in order to help stimulate our economy. You shouldn't be so cocky. You should also spend more time "studying economics" because you seem very uneducated and lack knowledge of the subject.
People act as though Bush is responsible for all of their problems. He, alone, cannot send us to war. He does not have total control over the economy. The debt may be terrible, but war is expensive. Education has been decreasing and will continue to decrease. It dropped because of the programs Clinton had come to an end when he was removed from office. Unemployment has decreased since Bush got into office, however, it has risen lately because of the slowing in the economy.
Yes Bush must be blamed for other problems. When Bush is in charge of placing people into top jobs to assist in running programs, like FEMA, and the guy he appointed fucks up big time, it goes back to BUSH. I'm not sure what your talking about clinton being "removed" from office, you act as if he was fired. In bush's first 2 years in office, over 2 million americans lost their jobs.
No, Bush must not be blamed for other problems. Blame the person that was in charge of FEMA. You can't blame Bush for another mans mistakes, even if he was responsible for getting him the job.
I can't understand why people still believe that the planet is heating up because of man. The planet was hotter before, and the evidence exists on Greenland. We can see the remains of past civilizations under the snow and ice. There have also been many advancements with technology, allowing us to "investigate" global warming even further. By taking more ice core data, scientists have discovered that temperature changes before carbon dioxide levels.
Many people are convinced by the lies of Al Gore, and those that believe global warming is not caused by man are concidered idiots or uneducated people. The lie has infected the minds of too many. Even the man that first claimed global warming was cause by man has changed his opinion.
Gore has done this type of thing many times...got lost in the woods, (had to be rescued by S.Service), no idea of a price of a loaf of bread when being interviewed...the BAD thing is that he has no problem making millions off kids being forced to watch his propaganda, WHILE he refuses to debate legitimate scientists who disagree with his assertions. In short, he's a snakeoil salesman and hundreds of thousands of people have lost their jobs because of his lies.
Al Gore is an idiot. He is uneducated and loves to lie. People call Bush an idiot because they have no comprehension of the world around them and seem to believe everything the media tells them.
I was referring to his "an Inconvenient Truth." He constantly talks about global warming, but he doesn't actually know anything about global warming. When someone is called uneducated, it can have many different meanings. I should have simply said he is ignorant, however, that can be just as vague as uneducated. I would also like to mention that I don't listen to Rush and I could careless if he dropped out of school.
Yeah, he is an idiot. Because you know Harvard and Vanderbilt only accept idiots and don't provide education. I'm sure you're much more educated than Al Gore.
You should actually listen to what he says. Do your own research. You will see that he is an ignorant liar. You can pass any class without being intelligent. You can also be accepted to any school as long as you have money. I can guarantee you that I know more about global warming than Al Gore.
I should do my own research? You're the one making false claims. Obviously you're the one who needs research. As soon as you come out saying someone who went to Harvard and Vanderbilt Law School is 'uneducated' easily invalidates your argument that I need to do some research. And no, you may like to think, but you don't know more than him about global warming.
I made no false claim in my comment. It doesn't matter where a person was educated, but it does matter what material they were taught. Al Gore acts as though he is a scientists, when he is nothing more than a politician. You probably don't even know the first thing about global warming. Gore changed a lot of the data in his video, he also stretched the truth. There is a consensus that global warming is occurring, but most scientists know that it isn't caused by man.
You don't need to be a scientist to make a documentary. All you need are legitimate facts and sources to present backed by scientific proof, which all of them are. Your claim that most scientists believe "global warming isn't caused by man" is absolute shit. Is this why the NSF, WHO, top ranking scientists and universities all believe human interaction has hastened the increase of global temperate? You are obviously the one that "doesn't know the first thing about global warming."
Obviously you have missed my point completely. I would also like to point out that you don't need facts that have proof behind them because Al Gore didn't. He altered the data in his film and basically threw a bunch of crap in there to make it seem believable. The NSF is a government funded agency that has been known to lie in the past. Clearly, you have ignored everything else I have said. Do some actual research before talking to me again.
I must have missed your point because all of your "points" are based on faulty information that you've made up. No shit, the NSF is government funded thats why its called the NATIONAL science foundation. Did you have to research that one? And the NSF's views on global warming aren't publicly represented as they are distorted by the Bush administration. There aren't even any disputes that NSF has "lied" and Al Gore's sources are referenced on his website. YOU need to do your research, buddy.
I've done my research, but apparently you haven't. The fact that NSF is funded by the government wasn't my point. My point was that they have lied in the past. Nothing has been "distorted" by the Bush administration. People have been brain washed by Gore, so now people are being harassed and losing their jobs because they try to tell the truth about global warming. Everything I have told you is the truth, but call it lies if you want. It doesn't help anyone if you remain ignorant.
The NSF executive director is appointed by the president. Bush appointed Arden Bement, yet the NSF still suggests man plays a role in global warming. Your "point" that the NSF has lied in the past is bullshit, give examples. And the Bush administration has undermined press released from the NSF concerning global warming. Maybe if you watched the news within the last month you would know this. Ignorant kids like you who can't back their claims with evidence doesn't help anyone.
I find it fascinating how my claims are ignorant because I haven't provided proof. The only ignorant claims are yours because you only go based on the information provided from Al Gore. The news had been talking about man's contribution to global warming until recently. It's no longer a crime to tell the truth about global warming. People are realising that we don't cause as much harm as we previously thought.
Exactly, claims not based on evidence is proof of your ignorance, thanks for clearing that up. Secondly, NONE of the information I have listed was sourced from Al Gore. This is further proof of your ignorance and false claims. Lastly, I don't know what news source you're reading/watching. By the looks of it you're watching Bill O'Reilly or nothing at all.
Explain to us how Bush is an idiot. I'm assuming that you have made the assumption because you only watch the liberal media and never actually do any research. The true idiots are Clinton and Gore. Gore is an idiot for what he has done to our world. People are now considered unintelligent if they don't believe global warming is caused by man. Clinton is an idiot for what he did in office, and I'm not talking about the affair.
john135246, watch it again. He definitely started on the far right and swept across the ledge to the left, intending to include all of them. I saw the original event on C-SPAN. Bill Clinton was part of the party. Too bad you can't see how he turned away and rolled his eyes and sighed, in an unmistakable "I can't believe this guy" gesture.
Whenever I see someone making fun of what someone said by ridiculing the speaker's hair, weight, makeup, clothing, weight, apparent richness or poverty -- that's when I know that someone either hasn't a leg to stand on, or simply cannot think. That's you, CarMoves.
It's funny that you say that because Rush, Coulter, Hannity do it all the time.
Rush constantly calls Edwards the BRECK GIRL, etc.
Notice how you didn't respond to the other points of my comment. Rush who dodged the military due to an ass-pimple, is a college dropout, is a failed DJ who started a comment show, constanty rants about others.
So to have common sense and to discuss what you believe in the media requires you to have a college degree? Bill Gates never went to college and he was the richest man on the plant. So whats your problem with people not continuing their education?
let me guess. You're going to come back with a "Rush doesn't have any common sense." Am I right?
"...he was the richest man on the plant..." On the plant? Maybe you should go back to school. Bill Gates was a genius programmer, he didn't need school. Rush and Hannity have never done anything in their lives to make them expert on politics: * business - no * legal - no * medical - no * education - no * armed forces - no * politics - no They have only been a DJs! That means Ryan Seacrest has the same credentials as Rush and Hannity. So will you listen to Ryan?
oh you got me good with that one typo. And if Ryan Seacrest had a talk show, I would listen to him and if i didnt like him, then i wouldn't listen. What you should do for Rush and Hannity if you don't like them. Right?
Do all politicians have to be an expert on politics? Then why does the media?
* Big deal, Howard Stern also had best selling books -- more sold than Rush. Listeners buy the books for entertainment, not because Rush is a political expert.
* The peace prize thing was a goof, "talking" instead of "doing" doesn't get you a peace prize.
* Radio hall of fame is a joke. Guess who's not in it?
* Another big deal -- Simon Cowell is hugely paid without a musical background. His success comes from being brash. BTW, Howard Stern makes more than Rush.
CarMoves, did i say hes an expert? thats exactly opposite of what i am saying. Your just scared of him because hes taking your votes and making them change parties. What are your problems with him?
Yea, HippyHunterkj, and remember, this is the genius who claimed he could have answered that reporter's questions about who were the premier rulers of five little nations Gore had probably never heard of. Easy task, when someone else got asked the question. All he had to do was say, "I knew that", and his little mindless minions nodded in unison.
I'm sure you know that is exactly what he did with global warming. After years of debate he made a film that portrayed him as the leader of the anti-global warming side.
Hey smart guy, actually MOST americans dont know shit about john adams, and they most certainly dont know what he looks like. He's not on our money... most americans can only place faces with presidents on our money.. its the truth...
And to the far right, we have Dita Von Teese, and to the far left, we have Marilyn Monroe sucking John F. Kennedy's dangle. And right next to that is Monica Lewinsky trying out her sphincter muscle on a Cuban cigar!
It is erroneous to call Al Gore an Idiot! In addition to creating the Internet, he also created rap music, daisy dukes, manned space flight, Angus beef, The Isle of Samoa, and lightning bolts. The latter being the reason we all now call him Big Daddy Thunder Rod.
You Idiot! Al Gore is in fact an idiot. He did not invent any of those things especially not the internet and isn't all is BS about global warming prove it?
Manbearpig
cdemanelis 5 months ago
Evidence / impacts of climate change series:
.
Plan for Nigeria climate change commission sparks debate – papers
.
A Nigerian environmental group has urged the country’s president, GoodLuck Jonathan, not to sign into law a bill creating a climate change commission in the country, saying this would steer focus away from other environmental issues, the Daily Trust newspaper reported on Friday.
.
Reuters
13 August 2011
Nightversionn 6 months ago
he presents fact, wtf this guy is a her0
sgtsnakeeyes11 6 months ago
Gotta give Rush credit for overcoming his obesity and getting his own tv show for a few months!!
philberz 9 months ago
No, no. Bush, that's an idiot, a real dumb f*ck. He simply lacks intelligence, really embarrassing to america to have had him for 8 years. Can't even compare him to Gore. And conservatives like Limbaugh defend him through all his screwups, and mocked Gore for stuff like this.
I mean, stuff like this doesn't even register with me any more, after the kind of stuff Bush pulled.
gunseng2 1 year ago
@gunseng2 o dear god your such a typical democrat.. bash the republican and have no facts nothing to back up what your saying.. just words and ignorance.. no clue on common sense no clue how the government should run just thinks the republicans are wrong cause "mommy and daddy said so" please... gore is a textbook hypocrite only interested in making his huge paycheck and keeping his power spot
anewillss 1 year ago
@anewillss Actually, I'm not a democrat, and my mommy and daddy doesn't wage a personal crusade against the republicans. And I am educated in politics, so I would say that I have a way better idea on how government should run than you have.
But even if you're a republican, you can't defend Bush. Ask a Reagan-question. Are you better off now than you were 10 years ago? Do you feel safer than you felt 10 years ago? Is the economy better than it was 10 years ago? No. Bush failed miserably.
gunseng2 1 year ago
@anewillss You know what, tell me something. Where did Bush succeed? How is america better after him? He got america stuck in two wars, which both costs hundreds of billions. At least one of which was totally unnecessary. Both of these wars create alot more terrorists than they kill. He wrecked the economy with huge deficits, finishing with a global economic crisis. He made the entire world hate the US. He seemed dumb. He refused to make a serious effort to solve climate change, and it goes on..
gunseng2 1 year ago
@gunseng2 how is america better after Obama?
Ischewlu 1 year ago
@gunseng2 You will find out how much you will miss Bush after the "Bush Tax Cuts" are illiminated by your buddy marxist. If you think Bush created a deficit in 8yrs, try looking at what your marxist buddy has done in 2yrs. (he trippled it). But I guess thats ok with you, because a democrat did it, right? cont....
MrOTLChamp 1 year ago
@MrOTLChamp The kind of rhetoric that calls democrats marxists or socialists is simply retarded. There is no socialism in the US and there is no left in the US, there's only the right and the more right.
Why should we keep a giant tax cut for the rich in times of crisis? Trickle-down doesn't work, those tax cuts have made the rich more rich and the poor more poor.
And yeah, Obama has spent tons of money to repair the US economy after Bush f*cked it up. He had to try and do something to clean
gunseng2 1 year ago
@gunseng2 ....cont. And your marxist buddy had a chance to end the wars, and chose not to. The Afganistan war is now all his. But, I guess thats ok with you also because hes a democrat. Open your eyes, sheep. And global warming is a fraud, so there is no need to do anything about it.
MrOTLChamp 1 year ago
@MrOTLChamp up the mess that Bush left. There's also a lot more that's f*cked up in the US, like health care and the lack of welfare, those issues have to be addressed in order to make the US great again. The difference between Obamas spending and Bushs spending is that he threw money away at unnecessary stuff, like his personal grudge with Iraq and tax cuts to make the rich more rich. Obama is spending money where it matters, in health care and to repair the economy. Obama at least spends smart
gunseng2 1 year ago
@gunseng2 You're a total idiot to think obama has done anything for the US. Wellfare is what we need to cut, not add too. Has wellfare ever made any country more profitable? No! Of course not. It's impossible. Wellfare is killing our country. Just look at what the illegal aliens cost California. Over 30 billion a year. Cont....
MrOTLChamp 1 year ago
@MrOTLChamp Why would we need to cut welfare, what kind of country do you want? An improved economy and a better welfare goes hand in hand. If the middle and lower class have more money they spend it at key businesses,they buy things they need to live. If money is concentrated amongst the super-rich they pile it on and spend less in times of crisis. If poor people get money they spend it, which will boost businesses and create more jobs
But above all better welfare makes for a happier population
gunseng2 1 year ago
@gunseng2 Dead wrong on better welfare. If you have better welfare, then you will naturally get more people on it. More people on welfare means more money taken from the people who matter (the people doing all the work). Welfare is like a vacuum, it keeps sucking more losers into the system. It's an incentive NOT to work, PERIOD.
Cont...
MrOTLChamp 1 year ago
@gunseng2 ....cont. It's a typical socialist program, and we don't need it. People need to take responsibility for themselves rather than milking the system. Why should we give money to people NOT willing to work when the money could be spent on better programs such as building roads, parks, and libraries? Cont....
MrOTLChamp 1 year ago
@MrOTLChamp What u need to realize is that to have a free, capitalist society one must have a social saftey net that is relatively non-porous. In capitalism it is invitable (and even desriable) for business to go belly up (it frees up resources for better uses). That will inevitable cause a lack of economic opportunity for some and unemployment for others – out of no fault of their own. So, no poverty is not the result of not tyring, it’s a natural side-effect of capitalism.
DoseOneIsJesus 8 months ago
@DoseOneIsJesus " What u need to realize is that to have a free, capitalist society one must have a social saftey net that is relatively non-porous"
Really? You're kidding right? That is a socialist statement. It's socialism that instills the social saftey net.
" In capitalism it is invitable (and even desriable) for business to go belly up" What? Says who? That is a rediculious statement. I think we will just let that one go due to ignorrants. Cont....
MrOTLChamp 8 months ago
@MrOTLChamp Its kinda hard to take you're opinion seriously when you cant even spell at a 4rth grade level ie. ridiculous*, safety*, ignorance* not ignorrants lol. I always find it kinda funny when some1 mispells or mispronounces the word ignorance when they're trying to call some1 else ignorant. It seems like u just like to label things as "socialism" or "typical democrat way of thinking" when they're really coming from a capitalist point of view. You try to twist things around and...cont
DoseOneIsJesus 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrOTLChamp trying to be slick but i see through your jedi mind tricks. Right after i said " What u need to realize is that to have a free, capitalist society one must have a social saftey net that is relatively non-porous" I go on to explain why this is necessary for the rise of capitalism. "In capitalism it is invetable (and even desirable) for business to go belly up (it frees up resources for better uses)." When that business goes belly up its not lazy, unemployed, illegal aliens...cont
DoseOneIsJesus 8 months ago
@DoseOneIsJesus Correction - Welfare is not necessary for the rise of capitolism. Its needed because many hard working americans become unemployed as a direct result of capitolism.
DoseOneIsJesus 8 months ago
@DoseOneIsJesus Kind of ironic, that you bitch and complain about grammer, then turn around and spell capitalism like "capitolism" twice in the same paragraph. LMAO. :) Nice one.
MrOTLChamp 8 months ago
@MrOTLChamp who are in need of wellfare. Its hard working americans who contribute to society on a daily basis. Now you can label that as whatever you want but it doesnt change the fact that we(when i say we im referring to hard working americans) need welfare to progress and keep poverty at a minimal level
DoseOneIsJesus 8 months ago
@DoseOneIsJesus " So, no poverty is not the result of not tyring, it’s a natural side-effect of capitalism."
Are you trying to tell me that there is a socialist country out there that doesn't have poverty? LMAO Again idiotic to think that socialism works. Look at China. A total socialist, communist country. Their poverty is far worse because of the control of the government. Not the people. Altimately a socialist country becomes a totalitarian government. Now you have poverty
MrOTLChamp 8 months ago
@MrOTLChamp So in conclusion, no, im not trying to tell you that there is a socialist country out there that doesnt have poverty. You pulled that ASSumption out of your own ass. What i AM trying to tell you is that this isn't about socialism vs whatever you label yourself as. This is about helping out your fellow hard working americans when they're down on their luck. Poverty is inevitable. What you have to realize is most of the people in poverty are there as a direct result of capitalism.
DoseOneIsJesus 8 months ago
@DoseOneIsJesus What you have to realize is most of the people in poverty (in America*) are there as a direct result of capitalism.
DoseOneIsJesus 8 months ago
@DoseOneIsJesus " most of the people in poverty are there as a direct result of capitalism."
Then how do you explain China having such a high degree of poverty if the cause is capitalism?
Capitalism creates an opportunity to make something of yourself, unlike socialism, which elliminates the opportunity to become succesful. Wheres the incentive to do anything? Why work when others will work and you can reap the benifits of their efforts? Cont....
MrOTLChamp 8 months ago
....cont. Why do you think America became such a great nation that so many people are willing to risk their life just to get here? I have never heard of anyone risking their life to get to China ot the UK. Your aguement is completely unfounded.
MrOTLChamp 8 months ago
@MrOTLChamp My arguement is just as strong as it was before u tried to twist ait around. I never said capitalism was the only cause of poverty. And truthfully i dont really give a fuck about poverty in China. Im talking about America. In America capitalism is a big cause of poverty. Its set up for the people on top to stay on top and the people on bottome to stay on bottom. The only people that benefit from capitalism are rich, greedy, motherfuckers like you. Not the average HARD WORKING... cont
DoseOneIsJesus 8 months ago
@DoseOneIsJesus Capitalism is not set up for only the rich to succeed. It's set up so that everyone has an opportunity to succeed. Many of the rich people started off as poor and became rich, others had earlier family members who made it rich and was able to give to their siblings. In herintance even comes from someone else's success. Something you probably never heard of in a socialist country. You have only the rights the government grants you in a socialist system. You're just a number.
MrOTLChamp 8 months ago
@MrOTLChamp Actually if u read my last two comments i spelled it CAPITALISM. At the end of the day as long as i dont spell ignorance ignorants im good to go. That was one of the most epic fail ive ever seen. Mind as well have called me ignant lol. But lets not get sidetracked. You keep bringing this back to socialism vs capitalism. Thats not what this is about. Ive already explained what this is about but apparently you have horrible reading comprehension skills. Im done talking to brick walls
DoseOneIsJesus 7 months ago
@DoseOneIsJesus Oh I'm sorry. were you at the end of a hard day? So sorry, And yes this about Capitalism v. Socialism. You keep referring to Capitalism being a failure, as if anything else would be different from socialism. Capitalism doesn't bread more welfare, liberalism does.
MrOTLChamp 7 months ago
@MrOTLChamp No im actually at the beginning of a beautiful day. The thing is welfare isnt the problem. Ive already explained this to you many times over. Welfare is the SOLUTION to the problem that capitalism has created aka poverty.
Ps. Spelling and grammar are two totally different things smart one. Have a nice day=)
DoseOneIsJesus 7 months ago
@DoseOneIsJesus So, taking money from hard working Americans and giving it to the lazy welfare people such as yourself is going to fix everything. What a liberal piece of shit, leach you are. Good luck with that philosophy. Moron.
MrOTLChamp 7 months ago
@DoseOneIsJesus You keep saying that it's capitalism that creates poverty, yet, all countries have poverty, and socialist countries such as China, N. Korea have a much higher poverty rate than America, Isreal, or Japan, which are the main capitalist countries. Your arguement has nothing to back it up.
MrOTLChamp 7 months ago
@MrOTLChamp lol are u still talking to yourself
DoseOneIsJesus 7 months ago
@DoseOneIsJesus Your lack of anything to say shows you still have nothing. Come back when you're more educated on what you're talking about. Saying stupid shit like Capitalism causes poverty. LMAO Name any other system that gives the poor an opportunity to get rich.
MrOTLChamp 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DoseOneIsJesus
DoseOneIsJesus = likes getting buttfucked by his daddy.
201006012006 3 months ago
@MrOTLChamp Americans. But at the same time i dont necessarily think socialism is the answer. Truthfully i think the answer lies somewhere between capitalism and socialism. I just dont see how this nation will ever b able to come to a compromise when we have people just as hard headed and greedy as you calling the shots. Ppl like u dont care about the negative effects of capitalism because they dont effect you. All u see are the positive effects while hard working americans are being ... cont
DoseOneIsJesus 8 months ago
@MrOTLChamp thrown under the bus to find themselves and their families in a deep shithole aka poverty. But as long as it doesnt effect you who cares right? We cant survive as a nation if everyone is only thinking about themselves. It just doesnt work like that. Capitalism only benefits the top 1% of the upper class. Why do you think that top 1% is even referred to as the CAPITALIST Class. Think about it buddy. We help out the top 1% that doesnt even need any help & leave the other 99% to...cont
DoseOneIsJesus 8 months ago
@MrOTLChamp rot. and thats supposed to b how we save our nation from poverty!?!? Wheres the logic in that???
DoseOneIsJesus 8 months ago
@MrOTLChamp Not because they're lazy like you were ASSuming
DoseOneIsJesus 8 months ago
@gunseng2 ....cont.
And I don't know where you got your information on America falling behind in science. America is still one of the leading countries in science, space travel medicine, etc, etc, etc. And if you think America is all screwed up because of the republicans you have another thing wrong.(probably because you don't live here and have no clue) Cont....
MrOTLChamp 1 year ago
@gunseng2 ....cont. Our economy is failing because of socialist programs created by the democrates. The main program that has affected our economy is a program that was pushed by democrates insisting that everyone should own a home. When they lowered the standard to buy a house when Clinton was in office. Cont....
MrOTLChamp 1 year ago
@gunseng2 cont.... They started loaning money to people that didn't qualify, therefore all those loans started going bad and houses were falling into foreclosure. This created a domino effect and lots of other people who did qualify lost their home as well. The construction industry came to a screeching halt, which affects about 1/3 of our business.
MrOTLChamp 1 year ago
@gunseng2 ....cont. California has a shortfall of 19 billion. Huh? That means the illegal aliens are bankrupting California. But a left-wing nut-job can't see that because it wouldn't be "politicaly correct" Bushes tax cuts are a big deal, just wait until obama cuts them. It will slow the economy even more. I've never got a job from a poor person, have you? No! Go learn about the economy before you try and persuade someone who has run a corporation for 20 yrs.
MrOTLChamp 1 year ago
Why do you think america is so corrupt and falls behind on science and all other aspects of society except defence spendings? It's because the nations priorities are f*cked up. The US is no longer a great nation, the people aren't happy and the politics are dominated by the usual republican agenda of war and economic crisis. The country has lost its way. Look to for example the scandinavian model, something between the US and that would make the state, the economy and society a lot stronger.
gunseng2 1 year ago
al gore invented the "hockey stick" and said we'll be under water before 2010.... lol
clarkcolt45 1 year ago
Impacts of global warming:
ScienceDaily
(Feb. 5, 2010)
— The increasing acidity of the world's oceans -- and that acidity's growing threat to marine species -- are definitive proof that the atmospheric carbon dioxide that is causing climate change is also negatively affecting the marine environment...
...says Antarctic marine biologist Jim McClintock, Ph.D., professor in the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Department of Biology.
Nightversionn 1 year ago
Still more climate change in the news...
ARCTIC ICE MELT COULD COST $28tln BY 2050: REPORT
Arctic ice melting could cost global agriculture, real estate and insurance anywhere from $US2.4 trillion ($2.8 billion) to $US24 trillion by 2050 in damage from rising sea levels, floods and heat waves, according to a report released on Friday.
MELBOURNE AGE
AUSTRALIA
February 6, 2010
Nightversionn 1 year ago
@Niightversionn
Spitfiremacx,
(I mean N ii ghtversionn Nig tversionn (no h)
Nigh tt versionn
Nightver ss ion,
Knigh tt vision
Nigh ttt version
Nightversiom,
Nightverslon, Nightversionnn, aryhuk, etc...)
You're 69 year old stalker. Youre a global warming DENIER with no peer-reviewed science so all you can do is play silly games. Further proof global warming deniers are frauds
Nightversionn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nightversionn 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch this video of Hitler, Stalin &Chinese Democracy admirers in support of the Global Warming Soviet style Pseudo-science
Input
"Socialists and Communists march to support global warming agenda"
Having Railroad conductors, IMF economists & foot doctors as climate experts is reminiscent of the pseudo sciences of the former Soviet Union
These frauds should be operating a Model Railroad Club not a Pseudo-science
Thisawareness 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Global Warming deniers are quiet sad creatures who deserve our compassion, like Nazis, Communists, Bush-voters and other reality gainsayers.
Furorprincipium 2 years ago
Gore was born an asshole.
glublub 2 years ago 4
@glublub ..... AND he worked at it his whole life.
glublub 2 years ago
Uh.... global warming deniers,
quit impersonating me with "Nigh tt versionn"
It is considered predatory behaviour on Youtube (Read the Community Guidelines below) and you will know.
It is a bannable offense
OK?
Nightversionn 2 years ago
the earth is getting warmer, but its not because of us, its because of natural processes. quit fucking whinin
omghai2u 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Al Gore was one of the architects of two of the most anti-American, anti-human rights, & anti-environmental legislation in the history of the United States. He was in office when NAFTA & GATT expansion to the WTO happened.
Multiple tens of millions of jobs that paid good wages were shipped to Al Gore's Marxist friends in China & the third world so that corporations who greased Gore's pockets could exploit the Environment & Human Rights & stuff their fat pockets with money
Treason
Thisawareness 2 years ago
You know, the fact that this moron almost managed to be elected is testament to the stupidity of 50% on the US population at the time.
"But hey, "He cud spayel "poe-tatoe" real gud, huh"?
I guess due to "Gore-Bull Warming" be exposed as a hoax, like I knew it was 15 years ago, it's not 50% anymore.
Oh well, what does he care, he made a fortune on it.
PalomarJack 2 years ago
If Al Gore was to reinvent himself which would be the best fit
A: Marshal Applewhite
B Forest Gump
C:Jerry Springer
D:Captain Kangaroo
Al Gore said to Marshal Applewhite " can you reserve me a seat in first class on the UFO?"
Thisawareness 2 years ago
al gore should give the Nobel money back to the polar bears
GGregorian 2 years ago 3
I will NEVER understand why anyone wastes time and money on Al Gore.!!! What a loser....
odhe1lo 2 years ago 36
Who are these people Ben Franklin and George Washington? Gore is an assclown.
deltapunk21 3 years ago 10
Good old Lafayette. We remember him dearly.
Saohesc 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I will never understand the irrational hatred towards Al Gore from Republicans.
Joe402 3 years ago
The fact that he uses junk science and misunderstandings about global warming and cooling periods of the Earth to bend to his own propaganda. This is exactly what Hitler did, and not only do Republicans not like Al Gore any intelligent Scientist that knows about Meteorology in general despises him.
JacobR248 3 years ago 30
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Oh so Republicans hate him because he advocates not ignoring science and criticizes our self destructive activities like driving hummers. Thanks for helping me understand this.
Joe402 3 years ago
"advocates". His graphs have over a 800 year lag from global temperatures and CO2. You want to know why? Because the majority of CO2 comes from the Ocean. When it gets warmer, more CO2 gets released from oceans, when it gets colder less CO2 releases from the ocean. The reason for the 800 year lag is that it takes so long for the oceans to warm and cool because they are so big and deep. He claims that CO2 drives climate when it's the opposite.
JacobR248 3 years ago 10
@JacobR248 2 thumbs up for that comment... Every reputable scientist that read his "peace prize winning paper" said it was total bull shit he just uses it to further himself.. he uses more energy in a month than families do in a year.. he can fly around in his jet and preach to us that we shouldnt drive.. he'll eat steak but tell us its wrong.. he's clearly the definition of hypocrite along with the rest of the democratic party!
anewillss 1 year ago
@JacobR248 Haha what a retard you are..
devrerffs 1 year ago
... well because Republicans hate it when stupid people come into power. For example. Al gore, and Clinton number one. and you are another fine example of a stupid person.
DXsukIT 3 years ago 7
Who are these people... Al Gore is a fucking retard!
bwhite53 3 years ago 7
Back in the 80's Gore was called an Atari Democrat. It's what we jokingly called fiscally conservative Democrats who believed funding technology was more important than welfare.
Gore created the High Performance Computing and Communication Act of 1991 which created the internet.
Pundits made fun of him when it was a new idea, while he was pushing it through and now they claim he didn't do it.
jamesvg25 3 years ago
offical proof that al gore IS the WORLD'S BIGGEST idiot! Manbearpig!
ordog101 3 years ago 5
lol
warbound2 3 years ago
El rushbo owns
thefreak985 3 years ago 3
Classic!
ybrix101 3 years ago
lmao
automaticAEV 3 years ago
jesus christ. some really fat unfunny asshole.
i dont think even your precious george bush could determine whether they were george washington
CaveofTwoLovers 3 years ago
BLESSED BE THE HOLY NAME OF JESUS!
steam0001 3 years ago 3
Bush 1206 on SAT's
Gore 1355 on SAT's
How does one even get their fucking application looked at with a 1206 for Yale... Oh yea, his dad got him in...
Bush is a fucking moron, bottom line. He has his faith and loyalties in Oil and big business, and thats it! And, yes there is Man caused global warming from volcanos and the tilt of the earth and others, but never before has the earth suffered from the shit were doing to it. If you cant understand that, your a dumb ass. Clinton was better!
mastro82mp 3 years ago
mastro82mp:
I can't believe you try using SAT scores to compare Gore and Bush. If you actually think that Gore is a reliable source and that Clinton was a better president, then you are a very ignorant person. You don't know the first thing about Bush, Clinton, Gore, or global warming.
madehero2007 3 years ago
Ok, the man was a bad business owner with oil in texas having to sell it, then bought the baseball team, and had to sell that, then was governor and put texas in debt really badly, texas also became listed as the top polluted state while he was governor. The man distorted the truth to get us into was with iraq. Changing his reasons like changing underwear, almost everyone is under investigation, he has doubled the debt, education is down, the economy is down, jobs are down...
mastro82mp 3 years ago
mastro82mp:
The economy began its decline because Clinton set up programs so that they would end when his term in office ended. In fact, the debt was rising before Clinton got out of office. Bush made the largest tax cut in history, he had to endure 9/11 and the most costly natural disaster this country has ever seen. He was lied to by several of our allies, which is why we went to Iraq. Iraq wasn't a total loss. We helped the people over there and it is still helpful for us to be in Iraq.
madehero2007 3 years ago
Wow, you obviously have very little understanding of macroeconomics. Firstly, your conspiracy regarding Clinton is irrelevant. What has Bush done to repair the economy regardless of the cause? You propose tax cuts. A tax cut is nothing more than a redistribution of wealth. This is no practical solution to repairing an economy. The former secretary of state advised Bush the invasion of Iraq would be a mistake and was based on questionable intelligence.
naatee 3 years ago
naatee:
I understand macroeconomics, but clearly you do not. Tax cuts are not a redistribution of wealth. Every time a democrat gets into office, their solution is to increase the tax burden on large corporations, make it difficult for businesses to thrive, and raise taxes for everyone. A tax cut can actually provide an economic boost, but that may be difficult for you to understand.
madehero2007 3 years ago
I study economics and some moron from Youtube claiming to know more than myself hardly hurts my feels. As I said, taxes only redistribute wealth. Read any book on economics and you will understand. It's humoring how many arrogant yet uneducated kids lurk on here.
naatee 3 years ago
naatee:
The best way to help our economy would be to reduce the tax burden on corporations. New businesses have difficulty starting up because of high taxes, and corporations are moving over seas because the costs have become too high for them to remain in the country. As for the secretary of state saying the invasion would be a mistake, that is only one man's opinion. I believe going into Iraq was necessary.
madehero2007 3 years ago
You never referred to corporate tax before. Maybe you should speak a little more clearly. If Bush is doing such a great job cutting corporate tax (which you have claimed has HAS done) then why is a 39% tax rate on 100k-335k gross income? The purpose of the secretary of state is to advise the president concerning foreign affairs. They receive all eminent report concerning foreign affairs. Only a fool would neglect someone as informed as the sec of state.
naatee 3 years ago
naatee:
I find it fascinating how you miss-quote me. I said that Bush had performed the largest tax cut in American history, but I never said that he reduced Corporate taxes. I said that we need to reduce Corporate taxes in order to help stimulate our economy. You shouldn't be so cocky. You should also spend more time "studying economics" because you seem very uneducated and lack knowledge of the subject.
madehero2007 3 years ago
I'm cocky for a reason, because I actually know what I'm talking about. Arguing you is a waste of my time.
naatee 3 years ago
naatee:
You have made it quite clear that you have no clue what you are talking about. If you knew what you were talking about, then we wouldn't be arguing.
madehero2007 3 years ago
mastro82mp:
People act as though Bush is responsible for all of their problems. He, alone, cannot send us to war. He does not have total control over the economy. The debt may be terrible, but war is expensive. Education has been decreasing and will continue to decrease. It dropped because of the programs Clinton had come to an end when he was removed from office. Unemployment has decreased since Bush got into office, however, it has risen lately because of the slowing in the economy.
madehero2007 3 years ago
Yes Bush must be blamed for other problems. When Bush is in charge of placing people into top jobs to assist in running programs, like FEMA, and the guy he appointed fucks up big time, it goes back to BUSH. I'm not sure what your talking about clinton being "removed" from office, you act as if he was fired. In bush's first 2 years in office, over 2 million americans lost their jobs.
mastro82mp 3 years ago
mastro82mp:
No, Bush must not be blamed for other problems. Blame the person that was in charge of FEMA. You can't blame Bush for another mans mistakes, even if he was responsible for getting him the job.
madehero2007 3 years ago
drop dead mastURBATIONfaggot..get a LIFE, VIRGIN old man !
LMFAO this retarded Commie fucktard troller
right92626 3 years ago
I can't understand why people still believe that the planet is heating up because of man. The planet was hotter before, and the evidence exists on Greenland. We can see the remains of past civilizations under the snow and ice. There have also been many advancements with technology, allowing us to "investigate" global warming even further. By taking more ice core data, scientists have discovered that temperature changes before carbon dioxide levels.
madehero2007 3 years ago
Many people are convinced by the lies of Al Gore, and those that believe global warming is not caused by man are concidered idiots or uneducated people. The lie has infected the minds of too many. Even the man that first claimed global warming was cause by man has changed his opinion.
madehero2007 3 years ago
Our contribution regarding greenhouse gases as carbon dioxide amounts to 0.43 of 9-27 % of the total greenhouse effect.
He seemed to forget Archimedes law and other laws.
Greenland won't melt and the North pole consists mostly of sea ice.
fredthefly 3 years ago
Shoot the messenger when you can't honestly dispute the message.
mv4455 3 years ago
Gore has done this type of thing many times...got lost in the woods, (had to be rescued by S.Service), no idea of a price of a loaf of bread when being interviewed...the BAD thing is that he has no problem making millions off kids being forced to watch his propaganda, WHILE he refuses to debate legitimate scientists who disagree with his assertions. In short, he's a snakeoil salesman and hundreds of thousands of people have lost their jobs because of his lies.
sillydude67 3 years ago
WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE?! come one that cant be real. If its real it's really funny! :D
skypatriotLvR 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
rush id a fat ass with man boobs
Hellaciousoutlaw 3 years ago
Laughing idiot.
Let's line up busts of every President, and let's see how many Rush can name.
They are looking at white busts, in front of white paint from 15ft-20ft away, it's not hard to see why they might not be able to notice.
I've seen a grey bust of Dubya upclose and it looked nothing like him, and I see him on TV all the time sans a powdered wig.
CarMoves 4 years ago
Excuses Excuses. If it were W who did it - it would be on Huffington Post DailyKoz, Keith Olberwacko for a month.
You know it and I know it.
Besides, Rush wasn't VP at the time.
Yes there are stupid questions--- and this was one.
Case closed.
palmerblade 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
You're kidding, right?
There are endless videos of Bush acting like a complete idiot.
Who is known for being stupid, Gore or Bush?
Thought so.
Case closed.
CarMoves 3 years ago
Al Gore is an idiot. He is uneducated and loves to lie. People call Bush an idiot because they have no comprehension of the world around them and seem to believe everything the media tells them.
madehero2007 3 years ago
Yeah, going to Vanderbilt and graduating cum laude from Harvard is very uneducated.
Stop listening to Rush -- who btw is a dropout.
CarMoves 3 years ago
I was referring to his "an Inconvenient Truth." He constantly talks about global warming, but he doesn't actually know anything about global warming. When someone is called uneducated, it can have many different meanings. I should have simply said he is ignorant, however, that can be just as vague as uneducated. I would also like to mention that I don't listen to Rush and I could careless if he dropped out of school.
madehero2007 3 years ago 2
Yeah, he is an idiot. Because you know Harvard and Vanderbilt only accept idiots and don't provide education. I'm sure you're much more educated than Al Gore.
naatee 3 years ago
naatee:
You should actually listen to what he says. Do your own research. You will see that he is an ignorant liar. You can pass any class without being intelligent. You can also be accepted to any school as long as you have money. I can guarantee you that I know more about global warming than Al Gore.
madehero2007 3 years ago
madehero2007:
I should do my own research? You're the one making false claims. Obviously you're the one who needs research. As soon as you come out saying someone who went to Harvard and Vanderbilt Law School is 'uneducated' easily invalidates your argument that I need to do some research. And no, you may like to think, but you don't know more than him about global warming.
naatee 3 years ago
naatee:
I made no false claim in my comment. It doesn't matter where a person was educated, but it does matter what material they were taught. Al Gore acts as though he is a scientists, when he is nothing more than a politician. You probably don't even know the first thing about global warming. Gore changed a lot of the data in his video, he also stretched the truth. There is a consensus that global warming is occurring, but most scientists know that it isn't caused by man.
madehero2007 3 years ago
Magehero2007:
You don't need to be a scientist to make a documentary. All you need are legitimate facts and sources to present backed by scientific proof, which all of them are. Your claim that most scientists believe "global warming isn't caused by man" is absolute shit. Is this why the NSF, WHO, top ranking scientists and universities all believe human interaction has hastened the increase of global temperate? You are obviously the one that "doesn't know the first thing about global warming."
naatee 3 years ago
naatee:
Obviously you have missed my point completely. I would also like to point out that you don't need facts that have proof behind them because Al Gore didn't. He altered the data in his film and basically threw a bunch of crap in there to make it seem believable. The NSF is a government funded agency that has been known to lie in the past. Clearly, you have ignored everything else I have said. Do some actual research before talking to me again.
madehero2007 3 years ago
I must have missed your point because all of your "points" are based on faulty information that you've made up. No shit, the NSF is government funded thats why its called the NATIONAL science foundation. Did you have to research that one? And the NSF's views on global warming aren't publicly represented as they are distorted by the Bush administration. There aren't even any disputes that NSF has "lied" and Al Gore's sources are referenced on his website. YOU need to do your research, buddy.
naatee 3 years ago
naatee:
I've done my research, but apparently you haven't. The fact that NSF is funded by the government wasn't my point. My point was that they have lied in the past. Nothing has been "distorted" by the Bush administration. People have been brain washed by Gore, so now people are being harassed and losing their jobs because they try to tell the truth about global warming. Everything I have told you is the truth, but call it lies if you want. It doesn't help anyone if you remain ignorant.
madehero2007 3 years ago
The NSF executive director is appointed by the president. Bush appointed Arden Bement, yet the NSF still suggests man plays a role in global warming. Your "point" that the NSF has lied in the past is bullshit, give examples. And the Bush administration has undermined press released from the NSF concerning global warming. Maybe if you watched the news within the last month you would know this. Ignorant kids like you who can't back their claims with evidence doesn't help anyone.
naatee 3 years ago
naatee:
I find it fascinating how my claims are ignorant because I haven't provided proof. The only ignorant claims are yours because you only go based on the information provided from Al Gore. The news had been talking about man's contribution to global warming until recently. It's no longer a crime to tell the truth about global warming. People are realising that we don't cause as much harm as we previously thought.
madehero2007 3 years ago
Exactly, claims not based on evidence is proof of your ignorance, thanks for clearing that up. Secondly, NONE of the information I have listed was sourced from Al Gore. This is further proof of your ignorance and false claims. Lastly, I don't know what news source you're reading/watching. By the looks of it you're watching Bill O'Reilly or nothing at all.
naatee 3 years ago
CarMoves:
Explain to us how Bush is an idiot. I'm assuming that you have made the assumption because you only watch the liberal media and never actually do any research. The true idiots are Clinton and Gore. Gore is an idiot for what he has done to our world. People are now considered unintelligent if they don't believe global warming is caused by man. Clinton is an idiot for what he did in office, and I'm not talking about the affair.
madehero2007 3 years ago
Rush haters always seem to be pseudo intellectuals that think attending their local community college makes them the next Plutarch, funny stuff.
And a liberal citing draft dodging.. hah.. hahahaha talk about the pot calling the kettle black eh?
Broyles86 4 years ago
So by your reasoning, Rush is less than an intellectual.
He didn't even attend at least a community college.
CarMoves 4 years ago
john135246, watch it again. He definitely started on the far right and swept across the ledge to the left, intending to include all of them. I saw the original event on C-SPAN. Bill Clinton was part of the party. Too bad you can't see how he turned away and rolled his eyes and sighed, in an unmistakable "I can't believe this guy" gesture.
blessedalcuin 4 years ago
This coming from Rush The Scholar -- sorry, forgot he's a dropout...
We can't see the busts, it might not look like the classical paintings we've seen of Washington.
We could sure see Rush in this video -- geez -- drop a kilo.
CarMoves 4 years ago
Whenever I see someone making fun of what someone said by ridiculing the speaker's hair, weight, makeup, clothing, weight, apparent richness or poverty -- that's when I know that someone either hasn't a leg to stand on, or simply cannot think. That's you, CarMoves.
blessedalcuin 4 years ago 2
It's funny that you say that because Rush, Coulter, Hannity do it all the time.
Rush constantly calls Edwards the BRECK GIRL, etc.
Notice how you didn't respond to the other points of my comment. Rush who dodged the military due to an ass-pimple, is a college dropout, is a failed DJ who started a comment show, constanty rants about others.
He is the Simon Cowell of radio.
CarMoves 4 years ago
So to have common sense and to discuss what you believe in the media requires you to have a college degree? Bill Gates never went to college and he was the richest man on the plant. So whats your problem with people not continuing their education?
let me guess. You're going to come back with a "Rush doesn't have any common sense." Am I right?
wampler258 4 years ago
CarMoves 4 years ago
oh you got me good with that one typo. And if Ryan Seacrest had a talk show, I would listen to him and if i didnt like him, then i wouldn't listen. What you should do for Rush and Hannity if you don't like them. Right?
Do all politicians have to be an expert on politics? Then why does the media?
Just take a look at some of his honors will you:
numerous highest selling books
nominated for a nobel peace prize
radio hall of fame
on of the highest paid talk show host
wampler258 4 years ago
"...Do all politicians have to be an expert on politics?" Ah, yes.
You seem to confuse "the do'ers" with "the critics". As if they were equals.
Rush has no background in anything besides being a DJ -- so he is expert in nothing.
Who would you trust, a doctor, or a medical critic with no background in medicine?
Would you trust a fund manager, or a critic who has no financial background?
Rush can give all the opinions he wants, but politicians know he's a joke and use him.
CarMoves 4 years ago
* Big deal, Howard Stern also had best selling books -- more sold than Rush. Listeners buy the books for entertainment, not because Rush is a political expert.
* The peace prize thing was a goof, "talking" instead of "doing" doesn't get you a peace prize.
* Radio hall of fame is a joke. Guess who's not in it?
* Another big deal -- Simon Cowell is hugely paid without a musical background. His success comes from being brash. BTW, Howard Stern makes more than Rush.
CarMoves 4 years ago
CarMoves, did i say hes an expert? thats exactly opposite of what i am saying. Your just scared of him because hes taking your votes and making them change parties. What are your problems with him?
wampler258 4 years ago
@wampler258 "...Bill Gates never went to college..."
Harvard is not a college?
CarMoves 2 years ago
"The only excuse for stupidity is further stupidity."
Palomar Jack
Stick that in your pipe, or Monica, and smoke it, Johnson.
PalomarJack 2 years ago
You fit that quote well.
CarMoves 2 years ago
@CarMoves, on the contrary, it was conceived, compiled and posted for people just like you. Enjoy!
/end of line
PalomarJack 1 year ago
@CarMoves, on the contrary, it was conceived, compiled and posted for people just like you, moron. Enjoy!
/end of line
PalomarJack 1 year ago
seus bostas..
rspoppi 4 years ago
wowo thats sad
lastopher7 4 years ago
Rush Rules!
JakeandElwoodBlues 4 years ago 3
Very much so!
Xanxer 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
NOBODY?
LAFEYETTE? JOHN ADAMS? JOHN PAUL JONES?!?!
He was VP and didn't know who John Adams was........wow.
I pray daily for the public education system.
HippyHunterkj 4 years ago
Yea, HippyHunterkj, and remember, this is the genius who claimed he could have answered that reporter's questions about who were the premier rulers of five little nations Gore had probably never heard of. Easy task, when someone else got asked the question. All he had to do was say, "I knew that", and his little mindless minions nodded in unison.
blessedalcuin 4 years ago
I'm sure you know that is exactly what he did with global warming. After years of debate he made a film that portrayed him as the leader of the anti-global warming side.
HippyHunterkj 4 years ago
Hey smart guy, actually MOST americans dont know shit about john adams, and they most certainly dont know what he looks like. He's not on our money... most americans can only place faces with presidents on our money.. its the truth...
mastro82mp 3 years ago
Most Americans weren't VP, and don't claim to be the savior of all humanity.
HippyHunterkj 3 years ago
I dont recall him ever saying he was the savior...
Bitter... Party of one!
mastro82mp 3 years ago
Vote Fred Thompson 2008!!!!
KingSportsFan 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no one.....but you?
badcop666 4 years ago
I think we all know who the real idiot is.
humpycub 4 years ago
you
cjc3usa1 4 years ago
You're responding to a meaningless 3 month old message and I'm the idiot?
humpycub 4 years ago
Indeed you are.Congratulations!
mattthecat03 4 years ago
And to the far right, we have Dita Von Teese, and to the far left, we have Marilyn Monroe sucking John F. Kennedy's dangle. And right next to that is Monica Lewinsky trying out her sphincter muscle on a Cuban cigar!
liliodine 4 years ago
Love ya Rushbo!
That Gore and Clinton are both idiots.
aelialicinia 4 years ago
I agree with sphincterspasm1. He is definetly Al Bore. He acts like a two-year-old and tries to convince people he is everything.
havingablast08 4 years ago 3
AL Bore! How can anyone take him seriously? Global warming? B.S.
sphincterspasm1 4 years ago 3
that's funny, he really is wacked out, have you heard his interview where he describes how he hypnotizes chickens? - this guy is a nut-case
cratgo 4 years ago 4
It is erroneous to call Al Gore an Idiot! In addition to creating the Internet, he also created rap music, daisy dukes, manned space flight, Angus beef, The Isle of Samoa, and lightning bolts. The latter being the reason we all now call him Big Daddy Thunder Rod.
bodhranmaster 4 years ago 4
You Idiot! Al Gore is in fact an idiot. He did not invent any of those things especially not the internet and isn't all is BS about global warming prove it?
havingablast08 4 years ago