Repent sinners, I can easily explain this. In the olden days human excrement was considered sacred. This is why today at the zoo, gorillas will throw their poopoo at you. It is because they love you and want to share that love. Like that God commanded humans to also throw their caca at each other as a sign of devotion and obedience to our Lord and Savior. This is why throughout the Bible we repeatedly here the stories of 'The Shit Hitting the Fan'
Actually, this is not as crazy as it sounds. DRIED fecal matter was (and still is, for some areas) a common fuel in some parts of the world (some regions of India, Tibet and Mongolia). The key is that it needs to come from herbivores (cows, yaks etc) so it has a high fiber content. I suppose if the human diet back then consisted of a lot of fibrous material, human shit would probably work just as well.
@VetinariClone: The rest of the video? Well, I agree that all the nonsensical instructions, symbolism mumbo jumbo and the whole concept of vicarious punishment/redemption ("bearing the sins of the whole city") are BS (no pun intended).
The reason why I commented was that the main "punchline" in the video is the part about cooking over burning shit. Yes it sounds gross, but many viewers may not be aware that it is a past and current practice (dried herbivore shit anyway).
@inyinyd : And on top of that it even was often the only avaiable combustible material for cooking, because as the hebrews were living in the steppe, there werent that much trees.
WOW - I tried reading the bible once and obviously never got as far as Ezekiel! LMAO
Well, as some of my well-meaning Christian friends and relatives tell me, "You can't just take one part of the bible and throw away the rest - you have to believe the WHOLE THING."
I wonder if they actually read the whole thing before making that statement... Hmmm.
Don't you have better things to do ? oh wait of course you don't your an atheist who doesn't want to praise Yahweh and YET you still are. Whole videos of him. Praise Jesus. REPENT
@ajazinggirl So by that logic, all christians who make videos about satanic celebrities, actually means they worship satan and their false idols?? Whole videos of satan. PRAISE SATAN 666
@ajazinggirl hahaha... Oh please tell me how what you said is not offensive to Atheists? Do you even realize i basically copied YOUR argument and fed it back to you?? Might as well be talking to yourself...
@JtotheKify Ofcourse its offensive to atheist. Its exactly what i was aiming for. I don't live my life walking around talking down to atheist or offending them with my " holier than thou perfect butt" I have friends who are atheist....But this is just upsetting. I wouldn't make vids on how much i disrespect one persons belief I'd like to get them to believe in Yahweh but never this. This is offensive which created the cause and effect. God bless you even though you dont believe : )
@ajazinggirl If you're offended by what's in the Bible, then you have a problem with God, not NonStampCollector. You may not like these videos, but they are thoroughly based on the Bible. NonStampCollector is mainly just showing you what you actually believe in when you say you believe in the Bible. Maybe you should actually read it first before mindlessly clicking on the "I Agree" button.
@j919or There must have been firewood, because other people (obviously) were cooking with something other than cow or human shit. Otherwise, it would not have been a big deal to suddenly start cooking with burning shit. Ezekiel was mentally ill. It sounds as though he had a very severe case of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. It's a shame he was literate. Had he not been, we could have to know about all this stupidity.
@j919or I have gone back and read the text in the original Hebrew and it actually says that they put the shit IN THE BREAD. The fecal matter was not used to make the fire, it was used to make the bread! Ezekiel needed to be put in a mental ward. Too bad there weren't any back then. If there had been, his insanity would never have influenced anyone and we would not be having this ridiculous conversation!
@j919or Well now, that sure is a God that loves his children! I'm sure most Americans bake bread with shit and feed it to their children as a punishment for something they did, right? When are Christians going to wake up and face the fact that their Bible leaders, Bible stories, and God(s) they worship are nutty, sick, ignorant, primitive and worthless. Look, it's okay to be wrong about something. I used to be a Christian. I was wrong. There, I said it. But I'm living in the real world now.
@politicoochie09 Dude, chill. You obviously have intense hostility towards God and are looking for justification for such. I used to have hostility too and after I finally saw just how evil was my hostility I realized that my ego/self was at the root of the problem. I asked God to save me from that self /ego and take control and do as He pleased with me. Im in heaven now and realize that hostility for God is hell. I so love God for saving me from myself . He loves me despite me not bc of me.
@j919or Funny how Christians think atheists have "hostility toward God." We can't be hostile against something that doesn't exist! What we are hostile toward is stupidity. And that's not an evil exercise. It helps humanity. Don't you think humans should at least try to get smarter? Your delusion is just a way to dump the responsibility for reality on someone else, like you letting "God do as he pleased with me." Humans are great liars. The biggest lies are when we lie to ourselves.
@j919or Now you're saying people should let God "control" their lives, when not long ago you were harping about how great "free will" is. Make up your mind. And, yes, if the God depicted in the Bible showed himself and told me that all that stuff in there about him was true, I'd tell him to "go away, you're evil and not worth worshiping." If it turned out God was something more rational and sane, I would have no problem at all believing in him/her/it.
@j919or Thanks for those either/or choices! Gee! Okay, so you are against free will? You just want Jesus/Yahweh to do all your thinking for you and control your life? You still haven't answered this question or clarified anything. I will just assume that free will is not a part of your mindset, which is odd, because this is one of the first things most Christians like to discuss.
I pity you, seriously. You have made yourself believe, that you are inherently evil, which only god can heal. Christianity has made you be convinced, that you are unable to do anything without your particular delusion. It very much describes the evil and inhumane tactics christianity has to use to make doubt into something "evil", and in the end only blames the people instead of the character they advocate. You are not inherently evil, but you have to understand, that your god is.
@MardasMan I pity u that have to hide in the dark of manipulation of the standard, human comparisons and misellaneous justifications. I admit that im evil and God changes me....Hooyah!
This is my assignment for the next german dub i will make at my dubbing channel. Mmmmhm, human extrement, mjam, or like we say in Germany: Scheiße fressen.
Idiot !! He's reading from the New Revised Version of the Bible. The original says this: "And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man, in their sight. And the LORD said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them." (Ezekiel 4:12-13) It's all about actually eating it. What a woosi atheist. Or else he's just trying to be polite.
In the original Hebrew, the words used when Ezekiel is told what to draw/write, numerically add up to 586, which is the date BC for when the temple got destroyed.
The 390 also symbolizes the years that the kings ruled before the northern tribes split from the throne to worship their idols.
@thegreatcheesedemon That does not change the fact that Yahweh is commanding a man to eat bread over burning shit. And counting numeral integers of the passage to derive meaning? This isn't the Da Vinci code, man. Wouldn't it be more likely that this is a passage detailing the degree of respect one must have for the decrees of Yahweh? A terrifying call to obedience and action without regard for personal comfort?
Indeed Ezekiel had to obey these things, but they had reasons behind them. When people saw him making the symbol of the schism, they saw that he was making a prophecy.
This drew attention to him and his writings, and this is why the book of Ezekiel is in the Bible.
Lol there's a cereal called Ezekiel quoting part of this verse, as the cereal is made of the ingredients mentioned in the bible. I feel like writing them a letter now and asking them if they cook their cereal over a fire fueled by cow shit.
All of you are so smart! Thank you for pointing all this out! And I thought God was good! I read that this passage was meant to be a graphic demonstration that siege was coming - judgment. Also, there's a mathematical prediction here predicting the exact day Israel would recapture Jerusalem. But now I see that the biblical author was actually just stupid and that God is actually bad, while all you guys are good! Thanks! I want you guys to be god now! You know so much more than that creator guy!
@alyosha24601 Are you serious? You mean, this was the only graphic demonstration of a siege the almighty creator of the universe could come up with? Make a man cook his beans on human feces? You can't possibly think such nonsense!
@volodask The point is that the exercise was abhorrent to the law-abiding Jews of the time - it was designed to shock them concerning the coming siege. He prophesied the atomic destruction of the United States as well, and even provided for an event which will provide a few days warning. Ezekiel is a fascinating book that has been productively studied for 2500 years - you guys sound like like a bunch of ten-year-olds making fun of a "stupid calculus book". Why don't you give God a chance?
@alyosha24601 Well if the purpose was to abhor anyone, it is a complete success! :D But if you really believe that something like that was the right thing to do for an absolutely good and caring creator of the universe, I am really sorry for you. As for all those metaphorical prophecies, which can be interpreted in thousands of ways, well, whatever. Obviously you are prone to believe what you want to believe even if doesn't make any sense.
@volodask I'm surprised you're not curious. In any event, you have the wrong idea about the Christian God. You think the Bible portrays him as a warm loving Santa Claus. That's only half. The other half is righteousness and justice. All evil is eventually crushed. He is also somewhat like a father. He allows and dishes out suffering for people in order to help them, just like a father might smack a toddler or allow a teen to suffer a disaster in order for him to learn. Haven't you seen Aslan?
@alyosha24601 Well, I may not be curious because there are millions of religious people out there claiming that precisely their favourite book contains the correct prophecies. And it's always some very metaphorical stuff, which allows infinite readings, and it's usually post-hoc that they "discover" that their book had predicted the event.
As for the rest, have your father ever made you burn human feces? If someone did it today to their children, we would send him to prison for child abuse!
@volodask Look, in this next sentence I'm not trying to turn you into a believer. Ready? I'm just telling you you do not understand the passage. It has a purpose, regardless of whether you believe it. Can't you let the Bible have it's own purpose? I have a Master's Degree in Old Testament, right? I'm just telling you you don't know what this is talking about. You don't understand it. I'm not saying you have to believe it, I'm just saying you don't know what the passage is about.
@alyosha24601 I readily admit that it has a purpose. I would never dispute that, nor would any atheist here do so, I suppose. We just point out that this purpose is in brazen contradiction with the way today's believers conceive God. I actually like Bible - it's a great book, just as Gilgamesh or Ramayana. What is crazy is to believe the things it says, or construe it as a standard for morality.
@volodask "I readily admit that it has a purpose. I would never dispute that, nor would any atheist here do so, I suppose. We just point out that this purpose is in brazen contradiction with the way today's believers conceive God." Well then, we may be more in agreement than one would have thought!
and all we're saying is a truly inspired work of 'god' would have no need of interpretation. there would be no misunderstanding, it would be understood by all no matter what language they spoke, or even if they could not read or were blind and stupid. having a master's in the OT is like having a master's in Marvel comics, only less productive. and all it has given you obviously is the ability to make more excuses on why the whole freakin thing isn't an absurd piece of shit.
@alyosha24601 You say "Why dont you give god a chance" I dont dismiss god, i lean towards a non exestant side as there is no evidence to suggest there is agod but equally there is no evidence to show he does not exist. So i have given "god" a chance. I am open minded as they come without being someone who lets everything in without being rational at the same time. If there is a god, it has nothing to d with man made christianity and his existance would not dispove evolution. You are so lost:(
I was Christian once. And then I did an awful thing. I read the Bible from cover to cover in my 18th year. And thought about it for a long time; nearly a millisecond, and discovered right at ".... Amen!" that I was no longer. Time has passed since then in my almost three-score and ten trips around the Sun, and I have found no evidence for any god or gods bar Nature whose revelation is truly Universal -- a big Universe it is, too. We are just tiny, almost invisible in the Grand Scheme of Things.
What does not eating food off the sidewalk have to do with what KIND of poop you set on fire and cook bread over. You're right, this is just F'ing stuipid.
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS FOR CREATIONISM-EVOLUTIONISM DEBATE (See Subchapter 10.2.2, Chapter 10, of Part Two.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
balancedway1.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
@AidanMclaren Because men fell they make shit. God has humans using non human dung to cook with as there is straw in that kind of dung, but humans using human would not be humans following God at all. God who is Jesus who is the I AM before Abraham was wants the best for us, and having Human waste to cook with or eat is not what God wants for us. I wish the religions of the world would stop separating Jesus from God in the old. Doing that perpetuates the myth that God in the old was bad.
@AidanMclaren He's a freaking troll I'm starting to think, last time I responded to his ignorance he flooded my inbox with paragraphs of comments for 3 hours >.<
@SidnelsomEzekiel 4 13And the LORD said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them. 14Then said I, Ah Lord GOD! behold, my soul hath not been polluted: for from my youth up even till now have I not eaten of that which dieth of itself, or is torn in pieces; neither came there abominable flesh into my mouth. 15Then he said unto me, Lo, I have given thee cow's dung for man's dung, and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith.
@Sidnelsom Israel was whoring after false gods again like the USA, and whoever has a foolish legal condemning system, and a wars, and thinks in a high minded way thinking they are better than the non human animals. They will end up doing things like that. Israel was defiling the good food by cooking with a thing no one should cook with.
@LYTHBAND I think that they want and need to believe it, so they do and say what it takes to keep it "true". This, and the total lack of critical thinking skills. I wish there was some guy up there looking out for me day to day, but I believe based on fact and evidence, not on what I WANT to believe. Wanting it to be true doesn't make it true, unfortunately :P
@inputverifier Definitely agree, but i always found it strange just because the bible is full of shit, doesnt mean people have to stop believing in a personal "god" in general.
@LYTHBAND A valid point, but in most cases, our idea of god comes from religion, and if that religion is falsified, why should we still hold onto the major claims of it? If we find a book about a PINK unicorn to be false, do we then chose to believe in a BLUE unicorn as a redundancy, or do we then question that maybe there IS no unicorn to start with? I see it as simply changing some of the details, in order to hold onto what the pink unicorn book taught us as a basis - that there are unicorns
@inputverifier Yeah true,Im an Atheist myself, but i still find "God" to imply so much more to people than a pink unicorn.Not interested in taking peoples personal philosophies about life away, and you can come to the "conclusion" about "God" (what ever that may mean to people) with out claims to fictional scripture.But hey thats just me. cheers
@inputverifier I feel that ideally people should either be what I consider a "pure" believer or take an objective stance on a deity. By "pure" I mean that they keep belief simple and not filth it up with all of the vile things of a religion and let go of the myths that are created to color a belief to keep people interested and gather simple believers who don't care to take the time to really dwell on what matters. If this religion was only about a god it would be much purer.
big lol @ 0:52! Ah deary me, it always amuses me that it's obvious that long ago some mesogonistic bully tyrant had influence over the 'holy book' and some people accept it purely because it's inside the bible.
@LIGHTRONIX People allow their religious documents govern the way they live, subsequently allowing themselves to commit such atrocities and feel morally and ethically justified, as if their actions were divinely sanctioned.
I'm not completely clear on what you meant about The Catcher in the Rye, all I am certain about is that religion is the personal justification behind the majority of detriments applied to society by humans.
"We need religion to give comfort to a world torn apart by religion"
@LIGHTRONIX Maybe Christians should write the "Holy Bible: New International Standard Correct Context Version".
Idiot: "I believe X"
Atheist: "X is obviously illogical or repulsive"
Idiot: "You took what I said out of context!"
Atheist: "What context is that?"
Idiot: "The context in which you're always wrong because you make me feel bad for being the toilet scum I was indoctrinated to be." (*hits atheist with a bible*)
actually dung is what many people have used, especially in areas were trees don't grow, as cookin fuel for thousands of years. it sucks, but its survival.
@cruelbusiness1984 You are right. So, how do you consider this video, I mean, this part of the bible?? Sorry for the question, only to know a point of view. Thanks.
jehova en hebreo significa suena asi = "he aqui arruinado" no lo entendieron JE= HE AQUI HOVA= ARRUINADO y jesus significa en hebreo he aqui caballo
JE= he aqui SUS = caballo
toda la vida clamando a un caballo y arruinado pero en los ultimos dias se limpiaria nuestra boca y dejariamos grecia para ir a la raiz
el angel le dijo a daniel que despues devia pelear con el principado de grecia y pues de ahi viene la traduccion de la reina balera hasta el calendario...
@jam1966ful "begs the question" doesn't mean what you think it does. It is a form of logical fallacy, technically called "petitio principii" and it doesn't mean what people generally assume it to mean as in "raising a question". Ironically however, by using it in the form in which you did it is a kind of petitio principii, just not for the reasons you may think. Sorry.. but it is one of those misuses of phrases which annoys me. Carry on, nothing to see here.
Disagree if my style is not to your liking I am sorry. I was using it as a rhetorical device.
Petitio Principii: (circular reasoning, circular argument, begging the question) in general, the fallacy of assuming as a premiss a statement which has the same meaning as the conclusion.
The use of irony in rhetoric is primarily to convey to the audience an incongruity that is often used as a tool of humor in order to deprecate or ridicule an idea or course of action.
@jam1966ful I don't care what you do or how you use language.. just thought you might be interested in the meaning. Apparently not. It's strange that you seem offended by criticism. That's a trait I expect of Americans, not the British. Guess I was wrong again.
You don't care how i use language. A hidebound pedant like i said. The English language is a growing thing. Should I have been putting forward a proposition in logic you may have a point, however I was merely using it in everyday speech. You pick me up on some point of pedantry but have nothing, absolutely nothing to add to the discussion. That is all you've done is pick a point of semantics, crikey I'd hate to have your drab life.
In America they sell "Ezekiel Bread" in some supermarkets, based on the recipe in the Bible. (It's actually not bad, made from sprouted grain.) ...But they don't mention the cooking-with-poo bit!
It doesnt require much knowledge of the Scriptures to see how this works in with the eating rules of the old covenant laws seperating them from the nations for a season. These are God's strange works and we are clay in his hands. The whole idea about judging the ways of God is preposterous to his Elect. God said it, so is it.
@Endnuenfyr right so he can b as crazy as he wants and we're supposed 2 sit back and say, 'he works in mysterious ways?' ur a gullible sheep.I wouldn't tolerate this from the mayor,the governor,or the president. I certainly wouldn't tolerate this from a universe tyrant.I'd rather b an anarchist for justice and equality then a sheeple in some imaginary heaven.I demand a universe government by the people, for the people.there's reason america did away with royalty.this imagined god is no different
No wonder it was never read in all my years attending Bible study and Sunday school; half the students would renounce the religion on the spot as facially asinine.
@sejembalm there's a reason y bible studies never start at page 1 and continue till the last verse in revelation. every1 would realize how moronic the bible writers were
ok i just read these chapters in the bible after watching this, seriously what the fuck is that suppose to mean, why would anyone think this would be a good idea and how would anyone to do this, its completely retarded,
chearly people are misled from the holy path of VOLTRON
I guess now that he's not cooking with his own dung he will have to live with it beside him for 430 days AND a store of cow dung lasting him just as long. Maybe there was some wisdom there, I dunno, haha. I wonder if he developed a stinky infected bed sore not being allowed to flip for 390 days.
God is , you will be very ashamed on that day when you stand before Jesus, awake my sleeping friend , awake! the dream your dreaming is about to pass away !
while you stare in wonder, at things you do not know,the middle east is "chapter 38 dance", while to stare at the words on the page and see what's on T.V. shaking your head ,hope it all away, hope it all away, then you turn for comfort, comfort,comfort never comes, bending, turning, spinning thoughts of burning candles dance through the window of your mind, staring ,staring staring lost with no hope, hope for hope, for, hope with your last breathe, you do not know....the flame to lite its wick.
of course the question "what does god need with a starship" is even furthuer from "what does god need with a bunch of burning human shit" then i realized before this video...
@southdakotagirl30 Okay, I didn't watch the video, but I've seen arguments around the Shroud of Turin before, so I'll assume I know what it's about. The problem is the Shroud of Turin is unexplained. I do recall something about carbon dating it and it coming up much later than it should have, and there has been an experiment which produced similar results.
However, let's assume that it's unexplained. Does that mean you have the explanation? No, that means it's unexplained; no one knows.
@southdakotagirl30 I account for deconversion stories very easily. If it was evidence that caused it, then you can see that faith and accepting evidence are incompatible. Point for my side, eh?
The Bible is a religious book; if you follow it, you have a religion.
My sarcasm enters into most conversations I have, so don't take it personally, and it certainly isn't bigotry. I haven't formed any judgements about you except from what you've said. For example, I believe you think sarcasm rude.
@southdakotagirl30 I am very interested in what you THINK is evidence of a deity. I am interested, mostly, in dismantling it. I'm convinced based on epistemology that you CAN'T have evidence of a wholly supernatural being. Evidence is the realm of science, and science does not comment on the supernatural, because it cannot, because there can be no evidence for it.
@southdakotagirl30 Complicated issue. I didn't say I dislike God, although I will add that Yahweh, as depicted in the Bible, is very unlikeable. I dislike the worship of gods. There is a difference. There could be some true creator of the universe, although I doubt I would really classify that as a god, but I'm not against the notion. Heck, let's say one of the worshipped gods is real, I still don't think they should be worshipped due to the harm caused by and to worshippers.
@southdakotagirl30 Depends on the definition you use. When I discuss philosophy, as we are, I use a single definition. That's important in order to avoid confusion.
2 is closest to the one I use, but I really think that faith defined as "belief regardless of evidence" is the best way to go when discussing religion. After all, no Christian I've ever met was swayed by the demonstration of evidence against their belief. That could be what 4 means by "secure belief."
@southdakotagirl30 Hypotheses are not faith-based. They're questions to be answered or statements to be verified. If they had faith, they wouldn't bother to experiment, they already believe in a specific outcome.
I don't start any beliefs on faith. I believe nothing until I have evidence or logic to support it.
@southdakotagirl30 Don't use the word "hypocrite" if you don't know what it means. I'll help, it's espousing beliefs you don't hold. Show me where I claimed to have a belief you know I don't have.
I don't like the idea of religion, I believe my channel states, due to the demonstrably harmful effects it has. I would still be interested in evidence for the existence of God, but I'm even more interested in what you THINK qualifies as evidence for God.
@southdakotagirl30 I didn't spend 30 minutes on it, I spent more like two or three. If you want me to follow through on it, I could waste several comments explaining how it really is the only interpretation of what you said, and accomplish nothing by doing so as I'm sure you'll still disagree, and what would it accomplish if you did agree?
@southdakotagirl30 Wait a minute, if you have evidence, why do you need faith? Are we using the same definition of "faith"? If you believe based on evidence then you can't believe based on faith, because faith is belief without, and sometimes in spite of, evidence.
@southdakotagirl30 I'm not going to follow the previous thread regarding what you may or may not have meant, as it's largely irrelevant. So, let's move on to this question of evidence for God, because at last count there was none. That you have some will be a huge relief to many. Care to share?
@southdakotagirl30 I did not misinterpret that comment; thanks for telling me I did, though. I interpreted the one where you equated Skaryon's hypothetical belief in scientists and doctors with faith to be a dismissal of science as faith. And from an atheist's viewpoint, calling something faith is dismissing it. From your perspective, I imagine it's not. So, do you believe in scientists and doctors on faith or on evidence?
@southdakotagirl30 I do like how you dismissed the science that built your computer and heats/cools your home, and the medicine which keeps you from getting measles, mumps, and rubella, to name just a few.
If you've ever looked at something, wondered how it worked, and took steps to find out, you exercised rudimentary science; the more disciplined version of the same, you dismiss as "faith."
@southdakotagirl30 Well, I don't know about Skaryon, but I highly recommend getting information from scientists and doctors, since you can verify what they're saying at any time by looking at their work. If you're not capable of that, you can look for other people who investigated it and verified their conclusion. It's a pretty decent system. I find it works much better than assuming that bronze age shepherds had a clue.
@Skaryon To be fair, there is a lot of stuff in the Bible that is parable. How you distinguish it is another matter. I've heard a credible interpretation of the "Jesus kills a fig tree" story, which doesn't make any sense when read literally. It's also a lot more sinister. The interpretation: Jesus was indicating that nations which have not yet bore the fruit of Christianity should be destroyed, even despite the possibility that they would bear that fruit later. Aesop's, it isn't.
eating shit...isn't that what christians do anyway when trying to prove their religion?
cr4yv3n 1 day ago
cow shit actually would be alot better. its no where near as dangerous as human shit. and it burns quite well. it also keeps away insects very well.
umidontno040394 3 days ago
Repent sinners, I can easily explain this. In the olden days human excrement was considered sacred. This is why today at the zoo, gorillas will throw their poopoo at you. It is because they love you and want to share that love. Like that God commanded humans to also throw their caca at each other as a sign of devotion and obedience to our Lord and Savior. This is why throughout the Bible we repeatedly here the stories of 'The Shit Hitting the Fan'
raywingfield 5 days ago 3
@raywingfield Are you kidding or on crack?
deadshot1995 5 days ago
@deadshot1995 both :)
raywingfield 5 days ago
@raywingfield Lol good to know
deadshot1995 5 days ago
Ezekiel: (Constantly snickering while writing the chapter of "Ezekiel")
Follower: "You're such a dick.."
Ezekiel: "Stfu, this is hilarious. Trollololol"
MrXenetics 1 week ago 7
About the HUMAN shit (instead of cow feces): if he`s lying there all alone, and there IS no cow... Well, it`s the only avaible fuel
MsXanatrix 1 week ago
HOLY FUCKING SHIT! this is the best shit ever!
HelFKiernan 2 weeks ago 2
Actually, this is not as crazy as it sounds. DRIED fecal matter was (and still is, for some areas) a common fuel in some parts of the world (some regions of India, Tibet and Mongolia). The key is that it needs to come from herbivores (cows, yaks etc) so it has a high fiber content. I suppose if the human diet back then consisted of a lot of fibrous material, human shit would probably work just as well.
inyinyd 4 weeks ago
@inyinyd Ok I'll grant you the dried shit part but what about the rest of it?
VetinariClone 2 weeks ago
@VetinariClone: The rest of the video? Well, I agree that all the nonsensical instructions, symbolism mumbo jumbo and the whole concept of vicarious punishment/redemption ("bearing the sins of the whole city") are BS (no pun intended).
The reason why I commented was that the main "punchline" in the video is the part about cooking over burning shit. Yes it sounds gross, but many viewers may not be aware that it is a past and current practice (dried herbivore shit anyway).
inyinyd 2 weeks ago
@inyinyd : And on top of that it even was often the only avaiable combustible material for cooking, because as the hebrews were living in the steppe, there werent that much trees.
MsXanatrix 1 week ago
I'd like to see anyyyyyone of yous guys fast for 30 days. Plain and simple
doin12doin 1 month ago
I find this one especially hilarious.
riahmatic 1 month ago 2
yes, this is in the holy text; however, it is part of the PLAN. so stop with the goddamn carping you fag atheists.
wp4866 1 month ago
@wp4866
God plans for his son to eat over shit? How is this in any way productive?!
MysticyPhoenix 1 month ago
omg stop arguing! both sides christian and atheist. let each other believe what ever they want stop forcing science/religion on each.
LaBrick1 1 month ago
WOW - I tried reading the bible once and obviously never got as far as Ezekiel! LMAO
Well, as some of my well-meaning Christian friends and relatives tell me, "You can't just take one part of the bible and throw away the rest - you have to believe the WHOLE THING."
I wonder if they actually read the whole thing before making that statement... Hmmm.
surfinjuli 1 month ago 3
Don't you have better things to do ? oh wait of course you don't your an atheist who doesn't want to praise Yahweh and YET you still are. Whole videos of him. Praise Jesus. REPENT
ajazinggirl 2 months ago
@ajazinggirl So by that logic, all christians who make videos about satanic celebrities, actually means they worship satan and their false idols?? Whole videos of satan. PRAISE SATAN 666
JtotheKify 2 months ago
@JtotheKify Praise whoever you want but this is Offensive to christians i wish you would stop
ajazinggirl 2 months ago
@ajazinggirl hahaha... Oh please tell me how what you said is not offensive to Atheists? Do you even realize i basically copied YOUR argument and fed it back to you?? Might as well be talking to yourself...
JtotheKify 2 months ago
@JtotheKify Ofcourse its offensive to atheist. Its exactly what i was aiming for. I don't live my life walking around talking down to atheist or offending them with my " holier than thou perfect butt" I have friends who are atheist....But this is just upsetting. I wouldn't make vids on how much i disrespect one persons belief I'd like to get them to believe in Yahweh but never this. This is offensive which created the cause and effect. God bless you even though you dont believe : )
ajazinggirl 2 months ago
@ajazinggirl If you're offended by what's in the Bible, then you have a problem with God, not NonStampCollector. You may not like these videos, but they are thoroughly based on the Bible. NonStampCollector is mainly just showing you what you actually believe in when you say you believe in the Bible. Maybe you should actually read it first before mindlessly clicking on the "I Agree" button.
StMattofDurham 1 month ago 21
@ajazinggirl The Bible is offensive to Christians? That's heresy!
StMattofDurham 1 month ago 2
Dude they were in the desert and it dried and got hard and there was no firewood. You are all worse than wet fecal matter and dumber.
j919or 2 months ago
@j919or You are in the desert & dried & got hard.
Strangerinasland 2 months ago
@j919or There must have been firewood, because other people (obviously) were cooking with something other than cow or human shit. Otherwise, it would not have been a big deal to suddenly start cooking with burning shit. Ezekiel was mentally ill. It sounds as though he had a very severe case of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. It's a shame he was literate. Had he not been, we could have to know about all this stupidity.
politicoochie09 2 months ago
@politicoochie09 ""There must have been firewood""
They were in the desert.
j919or 2 months ago
@j919or I have gone back and read the text in the original Hebrew and it actually says that they put the shit IN THE BREAD. The fecal matter was not used to make the fire, it was used to make the bread! Ezekiel needed to be put in a mental ward. Too bad there weren't any back then. If there had been, his insanity would never have influenced anyone and we would not be having this ridiculous conversation!
politicoochie09 2 months ago
@politicoochie09 ""put the shit IN THE BREAD.""
Yeah i reread it too and the context appears to state that this is a punishment for the people.
j919or 2 months ago
@j919or Well now, that sure is a God that loves his children! I'm sure most Americans bake bread with shit and feed it to their children as a punishment for something they did, right? When are Christians going to wake up and face the fact that their Bible leaders, Bible stories, and God(s) they worship are nutty, sick, ignorant, primitive and worthless. Look, it's okay to be wrong about something. I used to be a Christian. I was wrong. There, I said it. But I'm living in the real world now.
politicoochie09 2 months ago 2
@politicoochie09 Dude, chill. You obviously have intense hostility towards God and are looking for justification for such. I used to have hostility too and after I finally saw just how evil was my hostility I realized that my ego/self was at the root of the problem. I asked God to save me from that self /ego and take control and do as He pleased with me. Im in heaven now and realize that hostility for God is hell. I so love God for saving me from myself . He loves me despite me not bc of me.
j919or 2 months ago
@j919or Funny how Christians think atheists have "hostility toward God." We can't be hostile against something that doesn't exist! What we are hostile toward is stupidity. And that's not an evil exercise. It helps humanity. Don't you think humans should at least try to get smarter? Your delusion is just a way to dump the responsibility for reality on someone else, like you letting "God do as he pleased with me." Humans are great liars. The biggest lies are when we lie to ourselves.
politicoochie09 2 months ago
@politicoochie09 ""think atheists have "hostility toward God." ""
You do for even if God proved himself to you, you still wouldnt entrust ur life to Him to control it.
j919or 2 months ago
@j919or Now you're saying people should let God "control" their lives, when not long ago you were harping about how great "free will" is. Make up your mind. And, yes, if the God depicted in the Bible showed himself and told me that all that stuff in there about him was true, I'd tell him to "go away, you're evil and not worth worshiping." If it turned out God was something more rational and sane, I would have no problem at all believing in him/her/it.
politicoochie09 2 months ago
@politicoochie09 ""you were harping about how great "free will" is.""
Show where I was harping thusly or admit that u are a liar.
j919or 2 months ago
@j919or Thanks for those either/or choices! Gee! Okay, so you are against free will? You just want Jesus/Yahweh to do all your thinking for you and control your life? You still haven't answered this question or clarified anything. I will just assume that free will is not a part of your mindset, which is odd, because this is one of the first things most Christians like to discuss.
politicoochie09 2 months ago
@j919or
I pity you, seriously. You have made yourself believe, that you are inherently evil, which only god can heal. Christianity has made you be convinced, that you are unable to do anything without your particular delusion. It very much describes the evil and inhumane tactics christianity has to use to make doubt into something "evil", and in the end only blames the people instead of the character they advocate. You are not inherently evil, but you have to understand, that your god is.
MardasMan 2 months ago
@MardasMan I pity u that have to hide in the dark of manipulation of the standard, human comparisons and misellaneous justifications. I admit that im evil and God changes me....Hooyah!
j919or 2 months ago
This is my assignment for the next german dub i will make at my dubbing channel. Mmmmhm, human extrement, mjam, or like we say in Germany: Scheiße fressen.
MardasMan 2 months ago
Comment removed
MardasMan 2 months ago
mmm food cooked over human feces. TASTY XD
lordtidus12 3 months ago
If you're a Christian, notice how you have to make all kinds of excuses for your book of myths.
ndrthrdr1 3 months ago 2
Idiot !! He's reading from the New Revised Version of the Bible. The original says this: "And thou shalt eat it as barley cakes, and thou shalt bake it with dung that cometh out of man, in their sight. And the LORD said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them." (Ezekiel 4:12-13) It's all about actually eating it. What a woosi atheist. Or else he's just trying to be polite.
IslamWorksDotNet 3 months ago 2
Know what's funny? There are Christians right now trying to argue how this is sane.
spehizle 3 months ago 65
@spehizle : well god does not have to be sane., because, because, well...well, he's magical!! There! Pfewwww! That was easy, next! (lol)
Alineniz 2 months ago
@spehizle Yup. And now I'll contribute.
In the original Hebrew, the words used when Ezekiel is told what to draw/write, numerically add up to 586, which is the date BC for when the temple got destroyed.
The 390 also symbolizes the years that the kings ruled before the northern tribes split from the throne to worship their idols.
thegreatcheesedemon 1 month ago
@thegreatcheesedemon That does not change the fact that Yahweh is commanding a man to eat bread over burning shit. And counting numeral integers of the passage to derive meaning? This isn't the Da Vinci code, man. Wouldn't it be more likely that this is a passage detailing the degree of respect one must have for the decrees of Yahweh? A terrifying call to obedience and action without regard for personal comfort?
spehizle 1 month ago
@spehizle It has multiple meanings.
Indeed Ezekiel had to obey these things, but they had reasons behind them. When people saw him making the symbol of the schism, they saw that he was making a prophecy.
This drew attention to him and his writings, and this is why the book of Ezekiel is in the Bible.
thegreatcheesedemon 1 month ago
@thegreatcheesedemon And...what are the reasons an all loving god would make you eat over burning shit?
spehizle 1 month ago
@spehizle I can think of a few. Love and stuff.
thegreatcheesedemon 1 month ago
Lol there's a cereal called Ezekiel quoting part of this verse, as the cereal is made of the ingredients mentioned in the bible. I feel like writing them a letter now and asking them if they cook their cereal over a fire fueled by cow shit.
bodhidarma1 4 months ago
All of you are so smart! Thank you for pointing all this out! And I thought God was good! I read that this passage was meant to be a graphic demonstration that siege was coming - judgment. Also, there's a mathematical prediction here predicting the exact day Israel would recapture Jerusalem. But now I see that the biblical author was actually just stupid and that God is actually bad, while all you guys are good! Thanks! I want you guys to be god now! You know so much more than that creator guy!
alyosha24601 4 months ago
@alyosha24601 Are you serious? You mean, this was the only graphic demonstration of a siege the almighty creator of the universe could come up with? Make a man cook his beans on human feces? You can't possibly think such nonsense!
volodask 3 months ago
@volodask The point is that the exercise was abhorrent to the law-abiding Jews of the time - it was designed to shock them concerning the coming siege. He prophesied the atomic destruction of the United States as well, and even provided for an event which will provide a few days warning. Ezekiel is a fascinating book that has been productively studied for 2500 years - you guys sound like like a bunch of ten-year-olds making fun of a "stupid calculus book". Why don't you give God a chance?
alyosha24601 3 months ago
@alyosha24601 Well if the purpose was to abhor anyone, it is a complete success! :D But if you really believe that something like that was the right thing to do for an absolutely good and caring creator of the universe, I am really sorry for you. As for all those metaphorical prophecies, which can be interpreted in thousands of ways, well, whatever. Obviously you are prone to believe what you want to believe even if doesn't make any sense.
volodask 3 months ago
@volodask Errors: "repulse" in the first sentence instead of "abhor", and there is an "it" missing in the last one. Sorry.
volodask 3 months ago
@volodask I'm surprised you're not curious. In any event, you have the wrong idea about the Christian God. You think the Bible portrays him as a warm loving Santa Claus. That's only half. The other half is righteousness and justice. All evil is eventually crushed. He is also somewhat like a father. He allows and dishes out suffering for people in order to help them, just like a father might smack a toddler or allow a teen to suffer a disaster in order for him to learn. Haven't you seen Aslan?
alyosha24601 3 months ago
@alyosha24601 Well, I may not be curious because there are millions of religious people out there claiming that precisely their favourite book contains the correct prophecies. And it's always some very metaphorical stuff, which allows infinite readings, and it's usually post-hoc that they "discover" that their book had predicted the event.
As for the rest, have your father ever made you burn human feces? If someone did it today to their children, we would send him to prison for child abuse!
volodask 3 months ago
@volodask Look, in this next sentence I'm not trying to turn you into a believer. Ready? I'm just telling you you do not understand the passage. It has a purpose, regardless of whether you believe it. Can't you let the Bible have it's own purpose? I have a Master's Degree in Old Testament, right? I'm just telling you you don't know what this is talking about. You don't understand it. I'm not saying you have to believe it, I'm just saying you don't know what the passage is about.
alyosha24601 3 months ago
@alyosha24601 I readily admit that it has a purpose. I would never dispute that, nor would any atheist here do so, I suppose. We just point out that this purpose is in brazen contradiction with the way today's believers conceive God. I actually like Bible - it's a great book, just as Gilgamesh or Ramayana. What is crazy is to believe the things it says, or construe it as a standard for morality.
volodask 3 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@volodask "I readily admit that it has a purpose. I would never dispute that, nor would any atheist here do so, I suppose. We just point out that this purpose is in brazen contradiction with the way today's believers conceive God." Well then, we may be more in agreement than one would have thought!
alyosha24601 3 months ago
@alyosha24601
and all we're saying is a truly inspired work of 'god' would have no need of interpretation. there would be no misunderstanding, it would be understood by all no matter what language they spoke, or even if they could not read or were blind and stupid. having a master's in the OT is like having a master's in Marvel comics, only less productive. and all it has given you obviously is the ability to make more excuses on why the whole freakin thing isn't an absurd piece of shit.
flashoftruth 3 months ago
@alyosha24601 You say "Why dont you give god a chance" I dont dismiss god, i lean towards a non exestant side as there is no evidence to suggest there is agod but equally there is no evidence to show he does not exist. So i have given "god" a chance. I am open minded as they come without being someone who lets everything in without being rational at the same time. If there is a god, it has nothing to d with man made christianity and his existance would not dispove evolution. You are so lost:(
MrImmobile 3 months ago
I was Christian once. And then I did an awful thing. I read the Bible from cover to cover in my 18th year. And thought about it for a long time; nearly a millisecond, and discovered right at ".... Amen!" that I was no longer. Time has passed since then in my almost three-score and ten trips around the Sun, and I have found no evidence for any god or gods bar Nature whose revelation is truly Universal -- a big Universe it is, too. We are just tiny, almost invisible in the Grand Scheme of Things.
George4943 4 months ago 2
Oh, and by the way, say what you will about how demonic Pagan rituals are but we would never do something like that.
DepressedAnnnie 4 months ago
What does not eating food off the sidewalk have to do with what KIND of poop you set on fire and cook bread over. You're right, this is just F'ing stuipid.
DepressedAnnnie 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK (Donated) For Debates And Governance
Topics: WINNING ARGUMENTS FOR CREATIONISM-EVOLUTIONISM DEBATE (See Subchapter 10.2.2, Chapter 10, of Part Two.), The Issue On The Criminal Liability Of Foretelling The END OF THE WORLD, Other Debated Issues, Terrorism, War, Law, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, Others.
Websites: balancedway.yolasite.com
balancedway1.yolasite.com
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com
announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com
TheServiceWeb 5 months ago
Nonstampcollector, apparently I read that the bread was made WITH human feces; not cooked with them.
AidanMclaren 5 months ago
@AidanMclaren Because men fell they make shit. God has humans using non human dung to cook with as there is straw in that kind of dung, but humans using human would not be humans following God at all. God who is Jesus who is the I AM before Abraham was wants the best for us, and having Human waste to cook with or eat is not what God wants for us. I wish the religions of the world would stop separating Jesus from God in the old. Doing that perpetuates the myth that God in the old was bad.
kobidobidog 5 months ago
@kobidobidog
I have to say I wasn't really in the mood for your childishness.
AidanMclaren 5 months ago
@AidanMclaren Whether you are in the mood or not the truth is still the truth. That is what I told you.
kobidobidog 5 months ago
@AidanMclaren He's a freaking troll I'm starting to think, last time I responded to his ignorance he flooded my inbox with paragraphs of comments for 3 hours >.<
b33p3rz 5 months ago
@b33p3rz
Just another brainwashed wanker who doesn't want to grow up...
AidanMclaren 5 months ago
So, god tells believers to eat shit. That explains alot.
Sidnelsom 5 months ago 36
@SidnelsomEzekiel 4 13And the LORD said, Even thus shall the children of Israel eat their defiled bread among the Gentiles, whither I will drive them. 14Then said I, Ah Lord GOD! behold, my soul hath not been polluted: for from my youth up even till now have I not eaten of that which dieth of itself, or is torn in pieces; neither came there abominable flesh into my mouth. 15Then he said unto me, Lo, I have given thee cow's dung for man's dung, and thou shalt prepare thy bread therewith.
kobidobidog 5 months ago
@Sidnelsom Israel was whoring after false gods again like the USA, and whoever has a foolish legal condemning system, and a wars, and thinks in a high minded way thinking they are better than the non human animals. They will end up doing things like that. Israel was defiling the good food by cooking with a thing no one should cook with.
kobidobidog 5 months ago
Man the bible sucks,how can any one buy into this crap.
LYTHBAND 5 months ago
@LYTHBAND I think that they want and need to believe it, so they do and say what it takes to keep it "true". This, and the total lack of critical thinking skills. I wish there was some guy up there looking out for me day to day, but I believe based on fact and evidence, not on what I WANT to believe. Wanting it to be true doesn't make it true, unfortunately :P
inputverifier 5 months ago
@inputverifier Definitely agree, but i always found it strange just because the bible is full of shit, doesnt mean people have to stop believing in a personal "god" in general.
LYTHBAND 5 months ago
@LYTHBAND A valid point, but in most cases, our idea of god comes from religion, and if that religion is falsified, why should we still hold onto the major claims of it? If we find a book about a PINK unicorn to be false, do we then chose to believe in a BLUE unicorn as a redundancy, or do we then question that maybe there IS no unicorn to start with? I see it as simply changing some of the details, in order to hold onto what the pink unicorn book taught us as a basis - that there are unicorns
inputverifier 5 months ago
@inputverifier Yeah true,Im an Atheist myself, but i still find "God" to imply so much more to people than a pink unicorn.Not interested in taking peoples personal philosophies about life away, and you can come to the "conclusion" about "God" (what ever that may mean to people) with out claims to fictional scripture.But hey thats just me. cheers
LYTHBAND 5 months ago
@inputverifier I feel that ideally people should either be what I consider a "pure" believer or take an objective stance on a deity. By "pure" I mean that they keep belief simple and not filth it up with all of the vile things of a religion and let go of the myths that are created to color a belief to keep people interested and gather simple believers who don't care to take the time to really dwell on what matters. If this religion was only about a god it would be much purer.
hotpants69 5 months ago
"I would love to be cooking my food over cow shit!"
fatalcatler 5 months ago
The bible's writers were definitely on some powerful drugs..
elvigia666 6 months ago
Cooking with bullshit? It would've been funny if the guy decided to cook over burning Bibles.
MethanolCH3OH 6 months ago
weirdest*
RelientKftw 6 months ago
big lol @ 0:52! Ah deary me, it always amuses me that it's obvious that long ago some mesogonistic bully tyrant had influence over the 'holy book' and some people accept it purely because it's inside the bible.
725672567256 6 months ago
This isn't creative! He's just reading the bible the making word for word videos of the scriptures!
SlaveToNoOne 6 months ago
@SlaveToNoOne I think it's because you don't need to be very creative when the bible makes fun of itself.
inputverifier 6 months ago 2
@inputverifier Well said.
Audifan8595 5 months ago
LOOL. very creative
not25yet 6 months ago
I guess I can throw out all my cook books now!
AccessReality 6 months ago
@AccessReality This is a great example of how books can teach you about life: watch?v=ZSR8J6LUaT8
listen to what he says about metaphors and literary context
LIGHTRONIX 6 months ago
@LIGHTRONIX So is this:
/watch?v=FvtkTEKSgy8
AccessReality 6 months ago
@AccessReality what? that's not a book! it's a a stupid video that makes people think religion is the root cause of stupid things people do.
LIGHTRONIX 6 months ago
@LIGHTRONIX People allow their religious documents govern the way they live, subsequently allowing themselves to commit such atrocities and feel morally and ethically justified, as if their actions were divinely sanctioned.
I'm not completely clear on what you meant about The Catcher in the Rye, all I am certain about is that religion is the personal justification behind the majority of detriments applied to society by humans.
"We need religion to give comfort to a world torn apart by religion"
AccessReality 6 months ago
Uh, is that guy walking around an apparently-populated city naked? I mean, his torso and limbs are his skin color... heh :P
keiyakins 6 months ago
WTF? My comment has like 54 thumbs up, why are these 6 and 5 thumbs up comments listed under Top Comments?
awebster2001 7 months ago
@awebster2001 Because your comment is older.
LegolessVideos 6 months ago
taking scripture out of context and playing it straight is hilarious, but not very accurate.
LIGHTRONIX 7 months ago
@LIGHTRONIX Christians do it all the time for their brainwashing, what's the difference?
kiasta 7 months ago
@kiasta there is no difference, I wish that christians wouldn't do that either especially because they aren't doing it for lulz
LIGHTRONIX 6 months ago
@LIGHTRONIX Maybe Christians should write the "Holy Bible: New International Standard Correct Context Version".
Idiot: "I believe X"
Atheist: "X is obviously illogical or repulsive"
Idiot: "You took what I said out of context!"
Atheist: "What context is that?"
Idiot: "The context in which you're always wrong because you make me feel bad for being the toilet scum I was indoctrinated to be." (*hits atheist with a bible*)
Atheist: *grabs bible and throws it*
Idiot: "Hey, HAVE RESPECT!"
AccessReality 6 months ago
@AccessReality stop being so angry at the world and read some books man
LIGHTRONIX 6 months ago
First rule when smelling something bad is to keep sniffing and get closer *rolls eyes*.
mistereveready 7 months ago
actually dung is what many people have used, especially in areas were trees don't grow, as cookin fuel for thousands of years. it sucks, but its survival.
cruelbusiness1984 7 months ago
@cruelbusiness1984 You are right. So, how do you consider this video, I mean, this part of the bible?? Sorry for the question, only to know a point of view. Thanks.
hipyto 7 months ago
just goes 2 show what people will claim 2 believe when they don't finish reading the entire thing
cruelbusiness1984 7 months ago
Sometimes being simple makes all the difference. I really get it.
motivationalspeake 7 months ago
...
Fluffydoggy4 7 months ago
Comment removed
spectrumglare 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
shabbat shalom
jehova en hebreo significa suena asi = "he aqui arruinado" no lo entendieron JE= HE AQUI HOVA= ARRUINADO y jesus significa en hebreo he aqui caballo
JE= he aqui SUS = caballo
toda la vida clamando a un caballo y arruinado pero en los ultimos dias se limpiaria nuestra boca y dejariamos grecia para ir a la raiz
el angel le dijo a daniel que despues devia pelear con el principado de grecia y pues de ahi viene la traduccion de la reina balera hasta el calendario...
jldtrd2020 7 months ago
@jldtrd2020 que realmente no importa un poco o nada que ver con este video ...
cruelbusiness1984 7 months ago
hahaha!!!!! poop. when are you all gonna learn, athiests and christians...
SuperVice123 8 months ago
@SuperVice123 u don't think very often do u? atheists don't believe in this crap, or anything else supernatural. sounds like u need schooling
cruelbusiness1984 7 months ago
Comment removed
MrEmeraldfusion 8 months ago
Fuck man! thats worse than Gigsaw puzzle-tests from the saw movies. Shit!
Dreiz 9 months ago
Another pearl of wisdom from the bible. That god is one twisted fuck.
GrandmasterBBC 9 months ago 2
This is another quote that begs the question of believers "have you read the Bible!"
jam1966ful 9 months ago 51
@jam1966ful "begs the question" doesn't mean what you think it does. It is a form of logical fallacy, technically called "petitio principii" and it doesn't mean what people generally assume it to mean as in "raising a question". Ironically however, by using it in the form in which you did it is a kind of petitio principii, just not for the reasons you may think. Sorry.. but it is one of those misuses of phrases which annoys me. Carry on, nothing to see here.
jacksawild 5 months ago
@jacksawild
Disagree if my style is not to your liking I am sorry. I was using it as a rhetorical device.
Petitio Principii: (circular reasoning, circular argument, begging the question) in general, the fallacy of assuming as a premiss a statement which has the same meaning as the conclusion.
The use of irony in rhetoric is primarily to convey to the audience an incongruity that is often used as a tool of humor in order to deprecate or ridicule an idea or course of action.
Pedant.
jam1966ful 5 months ago
@jam1966ful I don't care what you do or how you use language.. just thought you might be interested in the meaning. Apparently not. It's strange that you seem offended by criticism. That's a trait I expect of Americans, not the British. Guess I was wrong again.
jacksawild 5 months ago
@jacksawild
You don't care how i use language. A hidebound pedant like i said. The English language is a growing thing. Should I have been putting forward a proposition in logic you may have a point, however I was merely using it in everyday speech. You pick me up on some point of pedantry but have nothing, absolutely nothing to add to the discussion. That is all you've done is pick a point of semantics, crikey I'd hate to have your drab life.
jam1966ful 5 months ago
I was eating when I saw this....
geniusjas87 9 months ago
Hahaha. Kind of gives a new meaning to the words "holy shit" now doesn't it Love your videos. Keep up the good work
longname25 9 months ago 4
CONTEXT!!!!!
:D
Mswordx23 9 months ago
In America they sell "Ezekiel Bread" in some supermarkets, based on the recipe in the Bible. (It's actually not bad, made from sprouted grain.) ...But they don't mention the cooking-with-poo bit!
Aeschylus 9 months ago 2
God will do what ever it takes to get man's attention, looks like it worked on you
raw5069 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It doesnt require much knowledge of the Scriptures to see how this works in with the eating rules of the old covenant laws seperating them from the nations for a season. These are God's strange works and we are clay in his hands. The whole idea about judging the ways of God is preposterous to his Elect. God said it, so is it.
Endnuenfyr 10 months ago
@Endnuenfyr right so he can b as crazy as he wants and we're supposed 2 sit back and say, 'he works in mysterious ways?' ur a gullible sheep.I wouldn't tolerate this from the mayor,the governor,or the president. I certainly wouldn't tolerate this from a universe tyrant.I'd rather b an anarchist for justice and equality then a sheeple in some imaginary heaven.I demand a universe government by the people, for the people.there's reason america did away with royalty.this imagined god is no different
cruelbusiness1984 7 months ago
Comment removed
Endnuenfyr 10 months ago
That passage in Ezekiel was... INSANE.
No wonder it was never read in all my years attending Bible study and Sunday school; half the students would renounce the religion on the spot as facially asinine.
sejembalm 10 months ago
@sejembalm there's a reason y bible studies never start at page 1 and continue till the last verse in revelation. every1 would realize how moronic the bible writers were
cruelbusiness1984 7 months ago 65
With the KJV, the 12th passage could mean bake it as an ingredient not as the fuel.
Knightyme 10 months ago
Comment removed
NicDaniel21 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ok i just read these chapters in the bible after watching this, seriously what the fuck is that suppose to mean, why would anyone think this would be a good idea and how would anyone to do this, its completely retarded,
chearly people are misled from the holy path of VOLTRON
KeyBal77 10 months ago
I guess now that he's not cooking with his own dung he will have to live with it beside him for 430 days AND a store of cow dung lasting him just as long. Maybe there was some wisdom there, I dunno, haha. I wonder if he developed a stinky infected bed sore not being allowed to flip for 390 days.
BrokenAeroVT 10 months ago
HAIL VOLTRON!!!
AnonymousComrade 10 months ago 2
God is , you will be very ashamed on that day when you stand before Jesus, awake my sleeping friend , awake! the dream your dreaming is about to pass away !
raw5069 10 months ago
@raw5069 You off your meds or something buddy??
WanDeRingLunaticc 10 months ago
while you stare in wonder, at things you do not know,the middle east is "chapter 38 dance", while to stare at the words on the page and see what's on T.V. shaking your head ,hope it all away, hope it all away, then you turn for comfort, comfort,comfort never comes, bending, turning, spinning thoughts of burning candles dance through the window of your mind, staring ,staring staring lost with no hope, hope for hope, for, hope with your last breathe, you do not know....the flame to lite its wick.
raw5069 10 months ago
of course the question "what does god need with a starship" is even furthuer from "what does god need with a bunch of burning human shit" then i realized before this video...
tgz1000 11 months ago
"Could you, like, take a crap for me?"
"......."
lol Best awkward moment ever!
RighteousRebel430 11 months ago
I dedicate this song to Yahweh! ~~> Savage Garden - I Knew I Loved You (Lyrics)
monteindamiddle7 11 months ago
Could u imagine Samuel L Jackson quoting this in pulp fiction instead of that other part x'D
GonzoInthefoot 11 months ago
"CAN YOU HELP ME OUT I'M ACTUALLY RUNNING A LITTLE LOW ON SHIT"
LegionIscariot 11 months ago 5
@southdakotagirl30 Okay, I didn't watch the video, but I've seen arguments around the Shroud of Turin before, so I'll assume I know what it's about. The problem is the Shroud of Turin is unexplained. I do recall something about carbon dating it and it coming up much later than it should have, and there has been an experiment which produced similar results.
However, let's assume that it's unexplained. Does that mean you have the explanation? No, that means it's unexplained; no one knows.
Antifides 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 I don't recall skirting any issues, and what was I supposed to ask from the beginning?
I still want to know what evidence you think you have.
Antifides 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 I account for deconversion stories very easily. If it was evidence that caused it, then you can see that faith and accepting evidence are incompatible. Point for my side, eh?
The Bible is a religious book; if you follow it, you have a religion.
My sarcasm enters into most conversations I have, so don't take it personally, and it certainly isn't bigotry. I haven't formed any judgements about you except from what you've said. For example, I believe you think sarcasm rude.
Antifides 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 I am very interested in what you THINK is evidence of a deity. I am interested, mostly, in dismantling it. I'm convinced based on epistemology that you CAN'T have evidence of a wholly supernatural being. Evidence is the realm of science, and science does not comment on the supernatural, because it cannot, because there can be no evidence for it.
Antifides 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 Complicated issue. I didn't say I dislike God, although I will add that Yahweh, as depicted in the Bible, is very unlikeable. I dislike the worship of gods. There is a difference. There could be some true creator of the universe, although I doubt I would really classify that as a god, but I'm not against the notion. Heck, let's say one of the worshipped gods is real, I still don't think they should be worshipped due to the harm caused by and to worshippers.
Antifides 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 Depends on the definition you use. When I discuss philosophy, as we are, I use a single definition. That's important in order to avoid confusion.
2 is closest to the one I use, but I really think that faith defined as "belief regardless of evidence" is the best way to go when discussing religion. After all, no Christian I've ever met was swayed by the demonstration of evidence against their belief. That could be what 4 means by "secure belief."
Antifides 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 Hypotheses are not faith-based. They're questions to be answered or statements to be verified. If they had faith, they wouldn't bother to experiment, they already believe in a specific outcome.
I don't start any beliefs on faith. I believe nothing until I have evidence or logic to support it.
Antifides 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 Don't use the word "hypocrite" if you don't know what it means. I'll help, it's espousing beliefs you don't hold. Show me where I claimed to have a belief you know I don't have.
I don't like the idea of religion, I believe my channel states, due to the demonstrably harmful effects it has. I would still be interested in evidence for the existence of God, but I'm even more interested in what you THINK qualifies as evidence for God.
Antifides 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 I didn't spend 30 minutes on it, I spent more like two or three. If you want me to follow through on it, I could waste several comments explaining how it really is the only interpretation of what you said, and accomplish nothing by doing so as I'm sure you'll still disagree, and what would it accomplish if you did agree?
Antifides 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@southdakotagirl30 Wait a minute, if you have evidence, why do you need faith? Are we using the same definition of "faith"? If you believe based on evidence then you can't believe based on faith, because faith is belief without, and sometimes in spite of, evidence.
Antifides 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 I'm not going to follow the previous thread regarding what you may or may not have meant, as it's largely irrelevant. So, let's move on to this question of evidence for God, because at last count there was none. That you have some will be a huge relief to many. Care to share?
Antifides 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 I did not misinterpret that comment; thanks for telling me I did, though. I interpreted the one where you equated Skaryon's hypothetical belief in scientists and doctors with faith to be a dismissal of science as faith. And from an atheist's viewpoint, calling something faith is dismissing it. From your perspective, I imagine it's not. So, do you believe in scientists and doctors on faith or on evidence?
Antifides 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 I do like how you dismissed the science that built your computer and heats/cools your home, and the medicine which keeps you from getting measles, mumps, and rubella, to name just a few.
If you've ever looked at something, wondered how it worked, and took steps to find out, you exercised rudimentary science; the more disciplined version of the same, you dismiss as "faith."
Antifides 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 Well, I don't know about Skaryon, but I highly recommend getting information from scientists and doctors, since you can verify what they're saying at any time by looking at their work. If you're not capable of that, you can look for other people who investigated it and verified their conclusion. It's a pretty decent system. I find it works much better than assuming that bronze age shepherds had a clue.
Antifides 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 As I thought, all you have to offer was incoherent, l deluded babbling stemming. NEXT.
Skaryon 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 So where did you buy your magic decoder ring?
Skaryon 11 months ago
@Skaryon To be fair, there is a lot of stuff in the Bible that is parable. How you distinguish it is another matter. I've heard a credible interpretation of the "Jesus kills a fig tree" story, which doesn't make any sense when read literally. It's also a lot more sinister. The interpretation: Jesus was indicating that nations which have not yet bore the fruit of Christianity should be destroyed, even despite the possibility that they would bear that fruit later. Aesop's, it isn't.
Antifides 11 months ago
@Skaryon That wording was awkward, so I'll rephrase. The interpretation makes some sense. The passage read literally does not.
Antifides 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 Holy logical fallacy, an argument from authority, isn't it cute.
Skaryon 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30 In other words: If it's too absurd or nonsensical, pretend it means something completely different.
Skaryon 11 months ago
@southdakotagirl30
why would it be rational even to make 1 person do this?
ViperstudiosNG 1 year ago
In Ezekiel 3, when the protagonist eats a "scroll" and find it to be sweet as honey, is it a reference to hallucinogens?
dashiellv 1 year ago