yeah but they found the large dredge stones used for wieghting the ark on top of the water..the ark never travelled anywhere but was anchored to stay on top of the water...dredge stones were large boulders with a hole at and in the top . this video doesn't do scientific squat
Here is what a reliable christian website has to say about the many claims of Ron Wyatt . He is the one behind the chariot wheels in the Red sea.--Are the claims true? If they are, such a staggeringly impressive list would mean that Ron Wyatt had been almost as miraculously assisted by God as the patriarch Moses
Ron Wyatts discoveries are fake. Here is what a reliable christian website has to say about it---Are the claims true? If they are, such a staggeringly impressive list would mean that Ron Wyatt had been almost as miraculously assisted by God as the patriarch Moses
Ron Wyatt claimed to have found Noah's ark, the Biblical Ark of the Covenant, the location of Sodom And Gomorrah, the Tower of Babel, the true site of Mt. Sinai, the true site of the crucifixion of Jesus, AND the original stones of the Ten Commandments (Whew! He finds whatever he looks for!). He also found a bunch of "chariot wheels" in the Red Sea, which he claimed proved the Biblical account of the Exodus from Egypt. Alas, the "wheels" turned out to be coral formations. Fail.
NONSENSE: Genesis is fiction, allegory. From the 106 schools that make up the " Christian College Coalition" only 5 teach that Genesis has to be taken litterally and that the "global flood" really happened.
@lizazoon - My metal detector pretty much confirmed the findings. I suggest that you bring your own and test it yourself before you claim anything to be fictitious. Practicing science will do your mind a lot of good.
It doesn't beep consistently on areas where the metal reading is rather weak, suggesting that we are targeting a bent rusted nail, and that the long end registers, but the pointed in facing the detector does not.
I'm sure more than 3000. You need to visit the site as we did. Unless you find the pattern yourself there's no way you'd be convinced. If you're an atheist, that is.
I came up with the theory to explain why we kept hitting the same sounding in one direction and not another, and only in the one spot. In other sections at the bottom we could ascertain no metal at all, and this goes with the "hole" hypothesis that others have come up with.
Not that any verification of Ron's work was needed for us, however, it is great to see his work repeated by a second group of witness's of a later time. I might also add, don't waste your time arguing with those that are the seed of the enemy. He does not go to the site, because he already knows it is real. His father tells him to debunk it's reality. He would not want to add credibility to anyone's work unless it was to the benefit of satan, therefore he will not likely go.
Hate to disagree with judgy, but the fact is, this video was meant for researchers who actually plan to go to the site, not for back seat critics. The video clearly shows a pattern of metal and we have seen the metal.
Go type in "Ron Wyatt" in wikipedia, if you have time read about his BS-filled life...scroll to bottom to the links, and look in the "anti-wyatt" links, read the "Answers In Genesis" link.. it exhaustively debunks all the myths about this so called ark site.
I guess you don't get it. This this video was to test the site to see if it is or is not the Ark. It is the Ark. I'm not Ron Wyatt and this is OUR research and NOT Ron Wyatt's. And as a matter of fact I have read almost every single critique against Ron Wyatt. I don't have to defend Ron Wyatt. This video falsifies those who say this isn't the Ark. And if you're interested I can further prove to you in minute detail that these critics are wrong.
Vortex, where is the metal then, why don't you dig some up? I'm a christan and I don't beleive the old testament stories to be true... jona and the whale? Noah's ark? And people think the Scientology stuff is wack?
Judgy, if you remove the metal what do you do to the pattern? The video wasn't meant for you. It was meant for near future researchers, to aid them in their metal detection at the site.
There IS no metal, MORON...the readings are just iron oxide present in volcanic basalt rock which is prevalent in the area... the pattern is RANDOM and is either dried mud or the basalt rock, you guys aren't fooling anyone
interesting, but still disturbed by the removal of evidence. Finding the "bitumen" in situ, may prove more valuable in understanding the nature and evidence of the site. If every tourist who visits takes a piece, you will over time be left with a site robbed of it value. More damage is cause by man then nature in this case.
This is the stupidest thing I've ever seen. This is a limestone formation. There is nothing siginificant or scientific in stringing some yellow tape across the ground. I implore you, get some objectivity, some critical thinking skills and join reality. Thanks for referring me to your idiotic videos. Not only are the bogus, they have no entertainment value whatsoever. Kudos.
TOH, there are scientists who claim that this is just a natural formation. 1. they claim that there is no pattern of metal (just random), or 2. no metal. Why? Because pattern indicates manmade. Further, this formation has a limestone outcropping that pierces it. The formation itself isn't limestone. You can tell by looking at some of the footage. Additionally, my contribution is merely going to the site with a metal detector to test the claims. Your words are somewhat disparaging.
Watch all my videos. Archeologist Ekrem Akurgal, an atheist, calls the formation a ship that needs to be preserved. The metal detection, radar scans, petrified wood, all prove this to be manmade.
We shouldn't take any human beings at their words. That's why I went to Turkey. Apparently many of Ron's critics have made up stories about the man. Claiming, for instance, that there is no pattern of iron at the site. I guess I would be somewhat doubtful too, if I hadn't gotten that pattern with a metal detector.
Thanks for the admitting that. Most people wouldn't admit that they made decisions at a time of their life when knowledge was scant, and immaturity dominant.
VortexDelta; If you don`t need evidence, you can believe anything.
Noach`s Arc is not only a material impossibility, there is not a shred of evidence. Enjoy your fantasy my friend and I relly hope you don`t end up in an asylum.
Honestly, what question is more important to you? IS the book of Genesis true, a reality, or who wrote Genesis? Being that there is a pattern of iron on a boat shape in Armenia, and being that an atheist named Ekrem Akurgal, also an archeologist, says that this formation is a ship, I suppose you could say that Genesis is a reality and that question about the author is an interesting question, yes, but not as important as my question.
The research shows that the area has been off limits because it's right next to the border (there are military encampments in the area), and it has been roped off so to speak, until recently. These videos were taken last September, so that's the most recent study.
Did you go to AiG,it shows at least another 4 'boat' shaped rock formations.Did you also look at the magnetic study performed on the 'boat' shape rock formation,it looks nothing like the so called iron patterns performed by these 'researchers'
You can find a boat shape if you took drugs. Unless you have real field work and studies done, as done at this site, all you have are some pictures and a lot of speculation. Bob Cornuke is the only one who has something really tangible, but it's not in Armenia.
In the eighties some violence broke out. This, and the hostile situation there, has kept people from wanting to do any work there. In the mid-90's Wyatt arranged to obtain a permit but was kidnapped.
Did you also look at the army photos which show just 13 of the many 'boat' shaped lava and mud formations in the same area.Why are you not examining all of the others as well.They can't all be the ark but they all look exactly the same.
Those photos aren't authentic. Note that these objects were photographed at an angle? And note that the Durupinar formation was photographed from directly above?
Of course the military isn't lying. I'm claiming that you can't identify boat shapes from an angle. As stated, the Durupinar site photograph was taken from directly above. These other sites were taken at an angle.
The thing that strikes me most about the color photos is how similar the 'ark structure' is to the rest of the surroundings.We have similar rock walls just in the background.
I noticed yet again Vortex has failled to explain what types of animals where on the ark EG cats and then how SUPER evolution occured to create all the types of animals we have today! No whys that?
That's silly. Tutankhamen did not live before the flood. He lived during Mose's time, and we Tutankhamen to be the son of Pharoah, the one who died from the plague.
Iron production isn't difficult. What is difficult is that you haven't watched this video, because i answer the question regarding Iron. In fact, African tribes have their own word for iron, but they have a borrowed name for horse.
Iron production in the bronze age was difficult.Iron occurs in a compound which was very hard to extract.If you were lucky you may have found an iron meteorite and that is why it was rare and a prized metal.
I was not using species, YOU make very bad mistake. Im just using a number of animals far smaller than whats need to be on the ark (If you dont believe in super Evolution). So many different "animal families" (Not that the bible uses this term) where on the ark and can you explain your term with examples, eg just two 2 cats, not lions, tigers, ocelots, etc etc etc
If you know the bible you will also realize Noah sacrificed some of the animals after the flood as a thank you to god.This seems to be quite illogical after all the time he spent saving them.
I don't see the point. Even some secularists don't argue that point. Many fish survive in brackish water. There is no proof that all fish would die, and it has been proven that salinity levels in our current ocean isn't the same everywhere.
Any tropical fish owner would be able to tell you you are wrong.If you like killing fish you could try the same experiment at home.Place your fresh water fish in a mild saline solution for 150 days,I'll put my money on the fish dying before the time is up.
jesuslives57 said, "Place your fresh water fish in a mild saline solution for 150 days,I'll put my money on the fish dying before the time is up."
If the flood happened, the water which was added to the oceans and caused them to rise above the mountains was likely fresh--from rain and the aquifers.
So, what we're talking about is fresh-water and salt-water fish in water that is much less salty than our current seas but a little saltier than rivers and streams.
Salt water fish live in water which is denser than their tissues. Salt fish body cells are constantly losing water to their environment so they are always drinking water to get fluid. Their kidneys work really hard to get the salt out. Freshwater fish have cells less dense than the water around them so they being flooded with fluid. Freshwater fish don't drink any water but are constantly urinating to get the excess water out.
The big question should be how so many animals and a few humans managed to survive while waiting for food to grow.If you believe in the creationist view,every thing would be under a massive layer of silt.What did Noah and his family eat except for the few burnt offerings.If he continued along that line for too long there wouldn't be many animals left.How long could a grazing animal live without grasses?
It seems very illogical to deliberately kill some of the animals.Imagine you have just spend 150 days on the ark feeding and taking care of them just to slaughter them when you hit high ground.
Look, petrified wood + evenly spaced metal readings, + boat shape (matches Biblical description) = Ark, as it's found in the Mountains of Armenia. Have you checked out the site? Did your own research? Obviously you're not going to accept my study nor my words, so do your own study and convince yourself. I did this to test it for me, not you. If you don't want to believe, good for you. Just don't tell me anything until you've been there.
So if only 10,000 deifferent kind of animlas went on the ark, we will ignore the fact all fresh water fish would have died, most plants and imsects would have died. That means there is .333 square meters for each animal on average!
but since yourark, is less than this lets be generous to you thats less than .25 square meters per animal. Excluding walk ways, ark structure, pens! LOL
I was not using species, YOU make very bad mistake. Im just using a number of animals far smaller than whats need to be on the ark (If you dont believe in super Evolution). So many different "animal families" (Not that the bible uses this term) where on the ark and can you explain your term with examples, eg just two 2 cats, not lions, tigers, ocelots, etc etc etc
Check your Muslim history--specifically what Uthman did. He modified the Qur'an and sent out a decree for everyone to burn all other copies, so Muslims telling Christians to stop trusting in their modified Bibles is laughable.
"Check your Muslim history--specifically what Uthman did. He modified the Qur'an and sent out a decree for everyone to burn all other copies, so Muslims telling Christians to stop trusting in their modified Bibles is laughable."
Ok your both wrong.
I know of plenty of mistakes/contradiction/lies on the bible. Im sure the Koran has them aswell
By saying "your both wrong", by which I'm assuming that you meant "you're both wrong", you're assuming that I believe that the current form of the Bible has no mistakes, contradictions, or lies. I never said such.
I was just saying that it's laughable for a Muslim to mock Christians for believing in a book that has been modified by men down through the ages when theirs has been too.
I would call that worshipping the current form of the book, rather than the God who originally revealed it.
i dont think that we trying to cover something. quran says bible is word of god but has changed. if we dont believe bible we cant be muslim. quran says the ark is in the mt cudi and funny part is this people who live around Durupinar formation was called cudi to this place before all this thing was fund. one more thing is quran have surah named Al-Hadid (The Iron). "...anzalna (We sent down) al-hadid (Iron), wherein is mighty power and many benefits for mankind...".
Suplilumas, I accidently removed the second part of your comment. You may repost. Yes, you are correct, the area is known as Cudi. The Koran is accurate about that fact.
Tubal-cain was a blacksmith.He is said to have worked with various metals but he never had an iron foundry.The only known iron ore at the time was in bedded in meteors.
Well his boat story doesnt add up, 8000 kinds of animals each. Means each pair of animals had a total area of 1meter by 37cm. this excludes, area of walkways, walls, ark structure.
This offocurse is no where near enought room. Its funny how christian websites mislead and talk about volume or the ark, and not the floor space avaliable for use by animals.
Im still waiting forVortex Delta to explain to me what ctas when ton and what ones SUPER evolved fromt he oens ont he ark.
This is a false statement. Iron has always been around. Hematite is a common mineral and metallurgists have argued that iron is quite common everywhere.
Because there is no metal there whatsoever, only volcanic basalt rock which contains enough iron oxides to set off the metal detector...this is mixed with dried mud, which causes the randomness of the readings..independent metal scans did NOT reveal the uniform pattern that Vortex here claims is there.
Judgy, I hate to be impatient with you, but let me in on the facts. I videoed petrified wood coming out of the site. I had some wood tested in a lab. Also, the readings aren't random and all you need to do is see the pattern in the video. Did you watch it? This is not Wyatt's video, it's MY video and that's not Wyatt's detector. This is OUR testing of the site. Now do your own testing before your critique.
Get impatient all you want..fact is NO petrified wood was found at that site, save for tiny splinters..either planted there, or carried there with the massive mud concentrations. INDEPENDANT scans with metal detectors by scientists, creationists and others hoping the claims were tru were bittery dissapointed when the readings were random and formed NO pattern like what you guys mapped out in the yellow crime tape.
Judgy, I have video showing planks in the ship. Wooden planks, like the end of 2x4's. My debate with you will continue to be fruitless. This video isn't made for you, but for researchers - those who plan to go there. You don't plan to go there so therefore this video isn't for you. It's not to prove anything to you, but to show researchers HOW to locate metal there. As to these supposed "independent" scans, a TLC video on Noah's Ark, showed INDEPENDENT scientists finding metal pattern.
yeah but they found the large dredge stones used for wieghting the ark on top of the water..the ark never travelled anywhere but was anchored to stay on top of the water...dredge stones were large boulders with a hole at and in the top . this video doesn't do scientific squat
paulbrink6 1 week ago
When will these whack jobs wake up. Noah's ark is a story of morality, again it is a story not to be taken literally.
jw4wvu 9 months ago
Excellent work. Truth in fact.
minesculis 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Here is what a reliable christian website has to say about the many claims of Ron Wyatt . He is the one behind the chariot wheels in the Red sea.--Are the claims true? If they are, such a staggeringly impressive list would mean that Ron Wyatt had been almost as miraculously assisted by God as the patriarch Moses
lizazoon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Wyatts discoveries are fake. Here is what a reliable christian website has to say about it---Are the claims true? If they are, such a staggeringly impressive list would mean that Ron Wyatt had been almost as miraculously assisted by God as the patriarch Moses
lizazoon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Imaginefree69 1 year ago
NONSENSE: Genesis is fiction, allegory. From the 106 schools that make up the " Christian College Coalition" only 5 teach that Genesis has to be taken litterally and that the "global flood" really happened.
lizazoon 1 year ago
@lizazoon - My metal detector pretty much confirmed the findings. I suggest that you bring your own and test it yourself before you claim anything to be fictitious. Practicing science will do your mind a lot of good.
VortexDelta 1 year ago
wow, gripping stuff, im literally at the edge of my seat
they found a pyramid in mexico, i guess that proves mayan religion correct
LOL
next video
cosmicism 1 year ago
@cosmicism - Hi octane stuff. Have you found a boat shaped formation, replete with ribs on a mountainous region? How did it get up there?
VortexDelta 1 year ago
lets start excavating already. clearly if its full of mud, it might be preserved.What are we waiting for??
2skullscrushing 2 years ago
Noah lived 950 years?
What did he die of?
Old, old, old, old, old, old Age.
gregrutz 2 years ago
Why doesn't it 'beep' every time he goes over it?
gregrutz 2 years ago
It doesn't beep consistently on areas where the metal reading is rather weak, suggesting that we are targeting a bent rusted nail, and that the long end registers, but the pointed in facing the detector does not.
VortexDelta 2 years ago
How many nails did Noah need?
3,000? Can any of you builders guess?
gregrutz 2 years ago
I'm sure more than 3000. You need to visit the site as we did. Unless you find the pattern yourself there's no way you'd be convinced. If you're an atheist, that is.
VortexDelta 2 years ago
So the first thing Noah had to do was build a nail factory to make the 5000[?] nails he would need. How long did it take to make a nail by hand?
gregrutz 2 years ago
Him and his three sons, having stronger stature and longer life, don't know.
VortexDelta 2 years ago
How long did Noah live?
30-40 years was called old in the past.
gregrutz 2 years ago
he live 950 years
takarkourt 2 years ago 2
@takarkourt Sure he did. LOL
gregrutz 2 years ago
metal detectors don't care which end of the nail it is looking at
gregrutz 2 years ago
I came up with the theory to explain why we kept hitting the same sounding in one direction and not another, and only in the one spot. In other sections at the bottom we could ascertain no metal at all, and this goes with the "hole" hypothesis that others have come up with.
VortexDelta 2 years ago
These people are not scientists.
The first people to study the site used dynomite to look below the surface.
They said it was a rock.
gregrutz 2 years ago
Some of the first people now believe it's Noah's Ark.
VortexDelta 2 years ago
Not that any verification of Ron's work was needed for us, however, it is great to see his work repeated by a second group of witness's of a later time. I might also add, don't waste your time arguing with those that are the seed of the enemy. He does not go to the site, because he already knows it is real. His father tells him to debunk it's reality. He would not want to add credibility to anyone's work unless it was to the benefit of satan, therefore he will not likely go.
tessorjim 2 years ago
Hate to disagree with judgy, but the fact is, this video was meant for researchers who actually plan to go to the site, not for back seat critics. The video clearly shows a pattern of metal and we have seen the metal.
VortexDelta 2 years ago
Go type in "Ron Wyatt" in wikipedia, if you have time read about his BS-filled life...scroll to bottom to the links, and look in the "anti-wyatt" links, read the "Answers In Genesis" link.. it exhaustively debunks all the myths about this so called ark site.
judgy3 2 years ago
I guess you don't get it. This this video was to test the site to see if it is or is not the Ark. It is the Ark. I'm not Ron Wyatt and this is OUR research and NOT Ron Wyatt's. And as a matter of fact I have read almost every single critique against Ron Wyatt. I don't have to defend Ron Wyatt. This video falsifies those who say this isn't the Ark. And if you're interested I can further prove to you in minute detail that these critics are wrong.
DeltaVortex 2 years ago
Vortex, where is the metal then, why don't you dig some up? I'm a christan and I don't beleive the old testament stories to be true... jona and the whale? Noah's ark? And people think the Scientology stuff is wack?
judgy3 2 years ago
Judgy, if you remove the metal what do you do to the pattern? The video wasn't meant for you. It was meant for near future researchers, to aid them in their metal detection at the site.
VortexDelta 2 years ago
There IS no metal, MORON...the readings are just iron oxide present in volcanic basalt rock which is prevalent in the area... the pattern is RANDOM and is either dried mud or the basalt rock, you guys aren't fooling anyone
judgy3 2 years ago
So a boat shape = Noah's ark? Wow, it's all so clear to me!
judgy3 2 years ago
Actually, metal detection scans, petrified wood, radar scans, boat shape with clear identifiers, etc.
VortexDelta 2 years ago
interesting, but still disturbed by the removal of evidence. Finding the "bitumen" in situ, may prove more valuable in understanding the nature and evidence of the site. If every tourist who visits takes a piece, you will over time be left with a site robbed of it value. More damage is cause by man then nature in this case.
Jaquitita 3 years ago
SO WHAT IF ITS A BOAT SHAPE FORMATION ! what did the arc sunk there to from that formation. this is nonsense.
buksingera 3 years ago
This is the stupidest thing I've ever seen. This is a limestone formation. There is nothing siginificant or scientific in stringing some yellow tape across the ground. I implore you, get some objectivity, some critical thinking skills and join reality. Thanks for referring me to your idiotic videos. Not only are the bogus, they have no entertainment value whatsoever. Kudos.
theorganichispanic 3 years ago
TOH, there are scientists who claim that this is just a natural formation. 1. they claim that there is no pattern of metal (just random), or 2. no metal. Why? Because pattern indicates manmade. Further, this formation has a limestone outcropping that pierces it. The formation itself isn't limestone. You can tell by looking at some of the footage. Additionally, my contribution is merely going to the site with a metal detector to test the claims. Your words are somewhat disparaging.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Pattern does not necessarily indicate man-made. This is evident from formations like the Giant's Causeway.
Although if there really are metal structures there then perhaps they should excavate them and prove that they're not natural.
Zdrazy 3 years ago
Watch all my videos. Archeologist Ekrem Akurgal, an atheist, calls the formation a ship that needs to be preserved. The metal detection, radar scans, petrified wood, all prove this to be manmade.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Why's that?
GillSlits 3 years ago
Noah's route--Armenia's route...
BeautySavesWorld 3 years ago
The Armenians discovered the Ark before anyone else. This is Armenian LAND!
aatechnologyACYT 3 years ago
Do you think that in the struggle between the old Armenia and Turkey that the Ark will be buried and forgotten? May that never happen.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Didn't this whole tale state from that fraudster Ron Wyatt?
jesuslives57 3 years ago
We shouldn't take any human beings at their words. That's why I went to Turkey. Apparently many of Ron's critics have made up stories about the man. Claiming, for instance, that there is no pattern of iron at the site. I guess I would be somewhat doubtful too, if I hadn't gotten that pattern with a metal detector.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Proper studies have been done and they go against your findings.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
No such studies have been done. There are claims that there are studies but they don't exist.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
theirs don't but yours do.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
The video shows a study. Do you know what a metal detector is?
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Vortex: get real man. I left that Noah`s Arc story behind in kindergarten.
Philos2006 3 years ago 2
Thanks for the admitting that. Most people wouldn't admit that they made decisions at a time of their life when knowledge was scant, and immaturity dominant.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
VortexDelta; If you don`t need evidence, you can believe anything.
Noach`s Arc is not only a material impossibility, there is not a shred of evidence. Enjoy your fantasy my friend and I relly hope you don`t end up in an asylum.
Philos2006 3 years ago
That's weird. See video. Hear metal sounds. see pattern. See large boat shape.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
VortexDelta, who do you believe wrote the book of genesis.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
Honestly, what question is more important to you? IS the book of Genesis true, a reality, or who wrote Genesis? Being that there is a pattern of iron on a boat shape in Armenia, and being that an atheist named Ekrem Akurgal, also an archeologist, says that this formation is a ship, I suppose you could say that Genesis is a reality and that question about the author is an interesting question, yes, but not as important as my question.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
I understand your point but what has all the research got to show after 30 years?
jesuslives57 3 years ago
The research shows that the area has been off limits because it's right next to the border (there are military encampments in the area), and it has been roped off so to speak, until recently. These videos were taken last September, so that's the most recent study.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Did you go to AiG,it shows at least another 4 'boat' shaped rock formations.Did you also look at the magnetic study performed on the 'boat' shape rock formation,it looks nothing like the so called iron patterns performed by these 'researchers'
jesuslives57 3 years ago
Correction: the air force ringed another 13 such formations.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
Correction, there are no such formations and no authentic photographs. And if you know so much about them, where are they?
VortexDelta 3 years ago
You can find a boat shape if you took drugs. Unless you have real field work and studies done, as done at this site, all you have are some pictures and a lot of speculation. Bob Cornuke is the only one who has something really tangible, but it's not in Armenia.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
The first studies were 60 years ago,this area has not been closed off for all of this time.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
In the eighties some violence broke out. This, and the hostile situation there, has kept people from wanting to do any work there. In the mid-90's Wyatt arranged to obtain a permit but was kidnapped.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Did you also look at the army photos which show just 13 of the many 'boat' shaped lava and mud formations in the same area.Why are you not examining all of the others as well.They can't all be the ark but they all look exactly the same.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
Those photos aren't authentic. Note that these objects were photographed at an angle? And note that the Durupinar formation was photographed from directly above?
VortexDelta 3 years ago
So the military are lying and you are right.Did you read the whole story?
jesuslives57 3 years ago
Of course the military isn't lying. I'm claiming that you can't identify boat shapes from an angle. As stated, the Durupinar site photograph was taken from directly above. These other sites were taken at an angle.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
The thing that strikes me most about the color photos is how similar the 'ark structure' is to the rest of the surroundings.We have similar rock walls just in the background.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
I guess that goes to show that you've never been there. This is the only boat shape that is in the area.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
I noticed yet again Vortex has failled to explain what types of animals where on the ark EG cats and then how SUPER evolution occured to create all the types of animals we have today! No whys that?
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
Gen 7:4
jesuslives57 3 years ago
Why should anything you say be trusted, especially since you are an atheist using the name "jesuslives57"?
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Thats a nice cop out.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
We also know from the time of Tutankhamen that iron was so rare it was considered more precious that gold itself.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
It was not a metal you wasted on mere nails.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
We also know from the time of Tutankhamen that iron was so rare it was considered more precious that gold itself.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
That's silly. Tutankhamen did not live before the flood. He lived during Mose's time, and we Tutankhamen to be the son of Pharoah, the one who died from the plague.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
That was my point.Iron production was difficult even at the time of the Pharaohs.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
Iron production isn't difficult. What is difficult is that you haven't watched this video, because i answer the question regarding Iron. In fact, African tribes have their own word for iron, but they have a borrowed name for horse.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Iron production in the bronze age was difficult.Iron occurs in a compound which was very hard to extract.If you were lucky you may have found an iron meteorite and that is why it was rare and a prized metal.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
I was not using species, YOU make very bad mistake. Im just using a number of animals far smaller than whats need to be on the ark (If you dont believe in super Evolution). So many different "animal families" (Not that the bible uses this term) where on the ark and can you explain your term with examples, eg just two 2 cats, not lions, tigers, ocelots, etc etc etc
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
If you know the bible you will also realize Noah sacrificed some of the animals after the flood as a thank you to god.This seems to be quite illogical after all the time he spent saving them.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
They where only clean animals, does it say how many where killed?
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
It just says he took some of the clean beasts and some of the clean flying beasts and offered a burnt sacrifice to god.Thats just plain stupid.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
Vortex has also dodged the question about all the fresh water fish and all plant being destroyed as stated in the bible.
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
I don't see the point. Even some secularists don't argue that point. Many fish survive in brackish water. There is no proof that all fish would die, and it has been proven that salinity levels in our current ocean isn't the same everywhere.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Any tropical fish owner would be able to tell you you are wrong.If you like killing fish you could try the same experiment at home.Place your fresh water fish in a mild saline solution for 150 days,I'll put my money on the fish dying before the time is up.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
jesuslives57 said, "Place your fresh water fish in a mild saline solution for 150 days,I'll put my money on the fish dying before the time is up."
If the flood happened, the water which was added to the oceans and caused them to rise above the mountains was likely fresh--from rain and the aquifers.
So, what we're talking about is fresh-water and salt-water fish in water that is much less salty than our current seas but a little saltier than rivers and streams.
Yosemite1967 2 years ago
Salt water fish live in water which is denser than their tissues. Salt fish body cells are constantly losing water to their environment so they are always drinking water to get fluid. Their kidneys work really hard to get the salt out. Freshwater fish have cells less dense than the water around them so they being flooded with fluid. Freshwater fish don't drink any water but are constantly urinating to get the excess water out.
jesuslives57 2 years ago
Because of this big difference in how their bodies are set up most fish cannot move between the two.
jesuslives57 2 years ago
So might, but alot that exist todya would die for sure, six months in salt water. No they die!
So explain what cats where on the ark, and ones SUPER evolved from them after the Ark?
I love hearing how SUPER evolution explains evolution doenst happen!
Even more insane than beliebving micro evolution and not macro evolution.
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
I'm sure the animals had a great time eating dirt when they left the ark.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
Well that it the bible clearly states everything was killed off on the land.
I would like Vortex to explain this too.
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
The big question should be how so many animals and a few humans managed to survive while waiting for food to grow.If you believe in the creationist view,every thing would be under a massive layer of silt.What did Noah and his family eat except for the few burnt offerings.If he continued along that line for too long there wouldn't be many animals left.How long could a grazing animal live without grasses?
jesuslives57 3 years ago
This is not illogical because he brought seven of each of the clean animals.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
It seems very illogical to deliberately kill some of the animals.Imagine you have just spend 150 days on the ark feeding and taking care of them just to slaughter them when you hit high ground.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
You're assuming that these animals were sacrificed immediately upon exiting the Ark.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Not at all.Even if he keep a few,what did they eat?
jesuslives57 3 years ago
Gen 7:4 clearly states god wiped every existing thing of the face of the earth.I assume plants do exist.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
Thats true, most fresh water fish would have died from the salt water oh well.
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
Well they would not wait. Anyway do you follow the 613 laws from the old testament which the new testament says you must follow to get into heaven?
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
There was no ARK..get over it.... wakey wakey.
judgy3 2 years ago
Look, petrified wood + evenly spaced metal readings, + boat shape (matches Biblical description) = Ark, as it's found in the Mountains of Armenia. Have you checked out the site? Did your own research? Obviously you're not going to accept my study nor my words, so do your own study and convince yourself. I did this to test it for me, not you. If you don't want to believe, good for you. Just don't tell me anything until you've been there.
VortexDelta 2 years ago
So if only 10,000 deifferent kind of animlas went on the ark, we will ignore the fact all fresh water fish would have died, most plants and imsects would have died. That means there is .333 square meters for each animal on average!
but since yourark, is less than this lets be generous to you thats less than .25 square meters per animal. Excluding walk ways, ark structure, pens! LOL
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
No. It means that the species assumption is wrong. Animal families were aboard the Ark, not species. You made a very bad mistake.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
I was not using species, YOU make very bad mistake. Im just using a number of animals far smaller than whats need to be on the ark (If you dont believe in super Evolution). So many different "animal families" (Not that the bible uses this term) where on the ark and can you explain your term with examples, eg just two 2 cats, not lions, tigers, ocelots, etc etc etc
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
i think muslims knowingly or not are doing the "devils work by trying to cover up any evidence of the bible being true.
osipiopos 3 years ago
The Qur'an says that the Bible is true (in its original form, anyway).
Yosemite1967 3 years ago
Orig one is long gone, they dont even use accurate translations of the 3 very different versions from 1700 years ago.
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
God updated to islam, its the devil tricking you into not believeing that!
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
That says nothing about the boat shape which has a pattern of iron, and is located in Armenia.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Check your Muslim history--specifically what Uthman did. He modified the Qur'an and sent out a decree for everyone to burn all other copies, so Muslims telling Christians to stop trusting in their modified Bibles is laughable.
Yosemite1967 2 years ago
"Check your Muslim history--specifically what Uthman did. He modified the Qur'an and sent out a decree for everyone to burn all other copies, so Muslims telling Christians to stop trusting in their modified Bibles is laughable."
Ok your both wrong.
I know of plenty of mistakes/contradiction/lies on the bible. Im sure the Koran has them aswell
TheBigGameHunter1 2 years ago
By saying "your both wrong", by which I'm assuming that you meant "you're both wrong", you're assuming that I believe that the current form of the Bible has no mistakes, contradictions, or lies. I never said such.
I was just saying that it's laughable for a Muslim to mock Christians for believing in a book that has been modified by men down through the ages when theirs has been too.
I would call that worshipping the current form of the book, rather than the God who originally revealed it.
Yosemite1967 2 years ago
i dont think that we trying to cover something. quran says bible is word of god but has changed. if we dont believe bible we cant be muslim. quran says the ark is in the mt cudi and funny part is this people who live around Durupinar formation was called cudi to this place before all this thing was fund. one more thing is quran have surah named Al-Hadid (The Iron). "...anzalna (We sent down) al-hadid (Iron), wherein is mighty power and many benefits for mankind...".
suplilumas 3 years ago
Suplilumas, I accidently removed the second part of your comment. You may repost. Yes, you are correct, the area is known as Cudi. The Koran is accurate about that fact.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
how can you metal detect a wooden boat
sjfriend 3 years ago
If you read the Bible account Tubal-Cain had a foundry of iron. So Noah's merely had to purchase a bunch of nails and make the ark.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
and they wouldnt have rusted in all these years?
im no sceptic, im born again, i just have doubt about this particular thing.
sjfriend 3 years ago
Metal won't rust if it's solidly packed and pretected under a thick layer of bitumen.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Wood did not rot away then in the last 4400 years? LOL or no wood so the iron can rust away?
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
Is this new or testament? Whats the reference, as ark was before the iron age!
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
If you had actually watched the video you would have seen the reference to iron before 4000 BC.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Thats before the iron age, noah was using iron nails, but no one else. Was not until much latter people started mining it!
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago 2
As I said, archeology proves that iron was used before 4000 BC. So that proves someone "else" was using iron.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Who else was mining iron?
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
If the ark was built in the bronze age why didn't Noah use bronze nails.Bronze is a stronger metal than iron or didn't god tell Noah that?
jesuslives57 3 years ago
If the ark was built in the bronze age why didn't Noah use bronze nails.Bronze is a stronger metal than iron or didn't god tell Noah that?
jesuslives57 3 years ago
Tubal-cain was a blacksmith.He is said to have worked with various metals but he never had an iron foundry.The only known iron ore at the time was in bedded in meteors.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
We don't even have proof he even existed.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
Well his boat story doesnt add up, 8000 kinds of animals each. Means each pair of animals had a total area of 1meter by 37cm. this excludes, area of walkways, walls, ark structure.
This offocurse is no where near enought room. Its funny how christian websites mislead and talk about volume or the ark, and not the floor space avaliable for use by animals.
Im still waiting forVortex Delta to explain to me what ctas when ton and what ones SUPER evolved fromt he oens ont he ark.
TheBigGameHunter1 3 years ago
Sure we do. The pattern found at this ancient boat structure.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
This is a false statement. Iron has always been around. Hematite is a common mineral and metallurgists have argued that iron is quite common everywhere.
VortexDelta 3 years ago
Iron may be common but no one at the time had the ability to mine the ore.The early iron objects were made from the by produces of bronze making.
jesuslives57 3 years ago
I think that you meant "embedded", rather than "in bedded". Right?
Yosemite1967 2 years ago
Me bad.
jesuslives57 2 years ago
why dont they dig to find out for sure?
akuma4u 3 years ago 2
Because there is no metal there whatsoever, only volcanic basalt rock which contains enough iron oxides to set off the metal detector...this is mixed with dried mud, which causes the randomness of the readings..independent metal scans did NOT reveal the uniform pattern that Vortex here claims is there.
judgy3 2 years ago
Judgy, I hate to be impatient with you, but let me in on the facts. I videoed petrified wood coming out of the site. I had some wood tested in a lab. Also, the readings aren't random and all you need to do is see the pattern in the video. Did you watch it? This is not Wyatt's video, it's MY video and that's not Wyatt's detector. This is OUR testing of the site. Now do your own testing before your critique.
VortexDelta 2 years ago
Get impatient all you want..fact is NO petrified wood was found at that site, save for tiny splinters..either planted there, or carried there with the massive mud concentrations. INDEPENDANT scans with metal detectors by scientists, creationists and others hoping the claims were tru were bittery dissapointed when the readings were random and formed NO pattern like what you guys mapped out in the yellow crime tape.
NO wood, NO metal, NOTHING
judgy3 2 years ago
to prove even with some doubt that an Ark was ever there.
judgy3 2 years ago
Judgy, I have video showing planks in the ship. Wooden planks, like the end of 2x4's. My debate with you will continue to be fruitless. This video isn't made for you, but for researchers - those who plan to go there. You don't plan to go there so therefore this video isn't for you. It's not to prove anything to you, but to show researchers HOW to locate metal there. As to these supposed "independent" scans, a TLC video on Noah's Ark, showed INDEPENDENT scientists finding metal pattern.
VortexDelta 2 years ago