that is the history, we cannot forget them, if we do the next generation can forget the same, what ever they did, by it with revolution, analysis and review only the modernity came ahead. Previous experience is always stepping stones to the future(success or failure).
People have migrated from one place to another for searching life(water or warriers based).
@Indiaexpress I'd rather fucked by arabian army than evil vedic brahmin army and live as a Sudra or even worse dalit for all my life time. Me and my future generation can choose our vocation now.
they treated u no less my boy.even till today,the arbs consider themselves and their culture highest among muslims.u dont know how they dont treat pak muslims with desrespect in arabia.they consider u inferior boy.nobody wanted to come under arab and islamic control. not even the own peopel of arabia.they captured the areas by conquest and oppression ,torture and rape and now propagating lies about pre islamic cultures.they treated u no less and even worse.
What arabs treating muslims bad have to do with Islam. We all know todays Arabs are uneducated assholes with a IQ of a Cannoli. Non-arab muslims dont need arabs to say how to belive or behave. on the other hand Brahmins(so called born brilliant) higher caste people should thought about turning 30% of hindus into shudra and 26% in even worse-dalits. Belive me! Islam is a far better choice the be trapped at lower stratum of oppresive system and live with agony your children will suffer the same.
arab army destroyed every pre islamic culture including yours by force,they raped and killed innocent women wnd children,imposed heavy taxes and restriction on people of middle east.they werent happy on conversion only.they wanted non arabs' submission of soverignity and wealth to arabs.read about brutal conquest of persia.
You truly speak like one of the RSS/VHP indutva propaganda machine..nope arabs did not rule india..it was Afghans/tukic rule. Propably you want to look into your own ass- how did you become a Hindu..was there any Vedic aryan invasion subjacation/enslavemnt system. Before you go on with we of lies on others culture
no there was never an aryan 'invasion'.if there had been the dravidian texts must have mentioned it.atleast a folklore should have been present but there is none.even the dravidians dont have any problems with aryans as there was never any fight.and yes afghan and turk.they themselves were invaded and plundered by arabs but later retaliated.the persians were forced to accept islam on sword.why would the persians wage war with arab if they wanted to?
Ofcourse dravidian texts and even vedic texts mention it. pertianing to this video, inherent language of Mohaenjadro was ancient Tamil, still Brauhi ppl live there as evidence to this testament. As a typical Islam hater, you are still pressing on with Islam spread by Sword..blah blah..blah. True fact is Islam was spread mostly my islamic mystics(Sufis) and lower caste trying to escape opression of hinduism.
ancient tamil right,lol! hahaha!y speak as if all the wesetrn historians are stupid and only u are a wise man.lol! true follower of zaid hamid who lives in his fantasy world and wants to make an islamic empire putting himself as a khalifa.hahahahaha! nice stories pal.nice stories.go to hollywood.they are famous for their 'accurate' depiction of history
Well! western Historian are much brighter than your guru Bal Thackrey the Historian and Billu the Barbariam. I would rather accept any monkeys history than a Hindutva faggots version of History. Hindusim= Opression
who told u that he is our guru? he is just a politician!and who is the hell is billu?lol!are u retard?first get your zaid hamid treated who wants to become the khalifa.
lol! u should do some reaserch on how u became a muslim.a large part of pakis are succesors of those hindus who were forced into islam by sword or by heavy jiyaza and now ironically hate the hindu civilisation from which they hail just like the afghanistanis who bomb bamiyaan statues built by their own ancestors.
Then I wonder where south india , where there was no islamic invasion,while they still make a bulk of muslims? There was no islamic invasion in malabar,tamil nadu, still they make 25% of 10% of muslims..who forced them to accept islam I wonder?
if isalm would have been spread by preaching not by armies then there was no problem but the arabians killed innocent,raped women,killed children looted wealth of middle east and then miidle east.why did the turks fight the arabs .they should have been friends right.
Turks never fought arabs.. I think you are mentioning Sasaniad persians fighting not the arabs ..but the arab muslims. They allied with Arab pagans to squash out islam at its infancy. Unfortunately for sasanaids, Eastern Romans god had a different plan.
@Indiaexpress The stupid arabs sided with Britsh and fought against Islamic Turks.. that will be the stupidest thing Arabs ever did.. Now they are reaping what they sowed in palestine.
Muslims making slaves of out of Blacks is again misunderstood esp by islamophobics. Black ppl did not have any option other than slavery before islam..but during islam there were black slaves, but however they were allowed to become free at a price. Any muslim or balcks themselves can attain freedom..becoming free at some ransom.not to mention there were lot of black masters, scholors, religious thinkers in Islam, Unlike a Shudra or Dalit who has no hope even with lot of money to be free.
they were allowed to be free at aprice,and those who couldnt afford it, they were destined to be slaves all their life under muslims right.and lol! sudra werent slaves,they were people with professions considered to be inferior.caste system took numerous years to establish,not like one had a dream one night and then sent his armies to suppress certain people.
Sudra has a profession of a Slave.. "meekly serve the upper caste" as it is said in racist Vedas..and I dont wanna bring manusmriti in this.. If Hitler would have read Manusmirti or Dharmashahstra..he would have felt like a baby. You know the verse in manusmirti which says" to chop the Anus of Low caste if he Farts in front of a High Caste" ..seriously man..if Hindu fuckers version of history is to be accepted.. we will all be tricked by goons smokin weed to acheive enlightenment.
hahaha! go on making stories.vedas are collection of hymns not rule book on how to kill jews and infidels ok! now go and fantacise about drinking wines and fucking virgin bouris of heaven. adios.
afghans are illetrate pepel.they dont know anything about their history including u.afghan was seized by greek army.they were looting the people there and dstroying their buddhist culture.chandra gupta maurya gave them freedom from greeks.even persia gained freedom from greeks as result.people of middle east would've been free today from the unwanted islam if mauryan empirehadnt broken down.
Seriously how old are you?.. The time of alexanders invasion &maurayan empire time(320 B.C) and the spread of buddhism in afghanistan(200 A.D.) were different ages. You dont want Islam does not mean any Afghans dont want to be Muslim. Afghans before Islam were mostly Zorastrians. The Brahminism idea of few pure race people who dont mix/marry with other wont have selled in islamic age and atleast muslims liberted the north-west india from few, cunning, subversive, lying brahmins.
200 A.D lol! the bamiyaan staues were made under the reign of ashoka in afghanistan during mauryan empire in 300 bc..zoroastrian were persians.lol! u are one ignorant man.
And please Bitch! Asoka did not built the buddhas..what a fucking ignorant dolt..you are..check wikipedia. And afghans are eastern persians..are you total that dumb! iranians, afghans, baloch, Tajik all belong to the persian language/religion. You can even ask your History book author Narendra Modi or Bal thackrey.
then who built it bitch?your momma?afghan was under mauryan empire in 300 bc.now as a moron u are u will now refuse it too.now u will say even elexander didnt invade afgahn.lol!
@Indiaexpress What a faggot bitch are you? Buddha statues was built by buddhist monks during 200 A.D asshole. you are in information age numbnuts! why dont you google. I know you will laugh on Accepted world history. Ashram History!Yeah. Homo. Vedic hyms inevitable asks hindus to look down upon low castes, Attest SATI.many hyms asks for giving birth to a son and curse women with birth of baby girl. Yeah faggot, I would rather Drink wine andfuck houris than be abused by Swami Nithayanda alive!
hahaha! now the monks who used to beg for food built the bamiyaan statues.hahhahaha! no there are no such hymns. sati was not practiced in south. why?lol! it was a cult practice of remote parts of north india asshole.there was no caste system in vedic period but of course u wont accept it.and yes i'm a homo.what would your islamic god do?burn me in hell till my skin drops off?lol!
@Indiaexpress No Homo asshole! Now you are trapped bastard! What if I produce you the Rig vedic (assholes book) verses which condone SATI faggot! homo will you accept SATI was Inherent of Vedic Hindusim.. Ok Now go to (RV 10.18.7) and (RV 10.18.8). where the Vedic got gets a orgasm by burning Women. SATI was practised everywhere in Aryavarta..not the south indians(Drravidian) people.. Dravidian( low caste) people are much brighter, intelligent than north indian Filth like You!
hahahaha! why the hell do u want to make a mockery of yourself?the first verse states that widows should come besides the pyre of her husband(unlit ofcourse)not immolate herself in it. and the next verse states that the women after pyre is lit should go back to their houses.lol! the earliest record of the term 'sati' is parvati who jumped in the yagya fire of havan of her father to impure it as he didnt invite her husband shiva into the ceremony.and yes shiva was alive then.
No fucker read the verse on SATI again and dont use typical hindu lie and deception here. Another verse from Vishnusmriti "Now the duties of a woman are ... After the death of her husband, to preserve her chastity, or to ascend the pile after him" how can you mistranlate this and Rigvedic one "Let these wives first step into the pyre, tearless without any affliction and well adorned" Step into the pyre means moving into burning pile of husband. Its always god get away with murder,women cant.
i went to wikipedia.they clearly stated what's the story from which the word sati is taken from and the verse which u are talking of are ambiguous.if sati was such an imporatant ritual in vedic times than they should have had a individual separate book for this.
@Indiaexpress Ofcourse Sati was important as in dhramashastras.. Basic verses taken from vedas and interpreted by sages like Manu, apastama, gautama, Vashista, Baudhayana, narada,brihaspati..all these sages attested SATI as the right thing to do inorder to aviod doubt on their chastity after their husbands have passed away.. Alexander the great and his Greeks thought of SATI as a practise by hindus to stop women from poisoning their husbands.
and again dravidians(low caste)lol! who are the priests that do prayers in balaji temples.who were those warriors under chola empire?who were the cholas.lol! now i'm gonna burst laughing. low caste are u non arab muslims which wwere considered inferior by muhmamad.hindu coverts although accepted islam but were terated as dogs by the more superior arabs and turks.
Yet another Bal thackrey's student assumtions. Muslims are mistreated by arabs??faggot. It will be great to live free in the homeland and libertated Low-caste( Convert to Islam, Christianity) than to live like Dog in homeland as dalits. During the Sultante and Mughal, Shudras and dalit were given position in government as good as Police cheif, governing a Misl. given the choice of being slave in their homeland or live with honor(convert to islam) many low-caste chose a better offer.
well maybe small posts but higher power always rested in hands of the pure turks and not all were given special treatments,majority of them were forced into salvery for which they world be released only after getting money. so they terated u no better.and a large part of low cates had become farmers even before islamic invasion out of which the turks used to wage a large sum of taxes on not getting of which they uesd to take their women as captives.
@Indiaexpress There was nothing like pure turks after babar. They mixed with hindu rajput/brahmin women so much..that later mugals like jalaludin akbar started looking like Indian mixed with turkic.
and again dravidians(low caste)lol! who are the priests that do prayers in balaji temples.who were those warriors under chola empire?who were the cholas.lol! now i'm gonna burst laughing. low caste are u non arab muslims which wwere considered inferior by muhmamad.hindu coverts although accepted islam but were terated as dogs by the more superior arabs and turks.
faggot.female infanticide also used to happen in arabia but of course u wont accept it.hahah! hinduism regard girls as divine my boy.infanticide was practiced jst for economic and social reasons not religious. what about the huddod law of islam ij which rape victim has to provide 4 'male' witnesses(why not female?) or else she is imprisoned today in pak ?
@Indiaexpress Female infencticide used to happen in Pre-Islamic arabic faggot(Jahalliya) as muslims call it. Not like to day in Punjab haryana..where for every male is 1000 and female is 872.. Hindu Religion sanctioned murder of female child explicitly.. till now this is practised..where hindu father always wishes a Male child to boast his position in Hindu society. Just to cleanse him for the curse Dowry was made. Female child as a curse is a typical Vedic Brahminism theory.
yes but that's for social and economic reasons as i already told u. and as i can see u didnt addresses ny comment on hudood law of pak.why,no answers?
go on boy,save your mother from hudood law in pak.always have 4 males compaony her incase she gets raped she doesnt spend the rest of her life in jail or the worse be stoned to death .
Man you must save your mother from being forced into funeral pyre..Incase your daddy dies. SATI is lovely law of lovely hinduism which gives equal rights to women=my ass. Nice vedic hym ordering women to be good hindu women and kill themselves - "Let these women, whose husbands are worthy and are living, enter the house with ghee (applied) as collyrium (to their eyes). Let these wives first step into the pyre, tearless without any affliction and well adorned" RV 10.18.7.
lol! jsut lol! there is no sati system practised in india today pal.our media is not like your pakistanis which curb the news of balichis being killed by pak army on the commands of musharraf. hudood law is still practised in pak and thousands of women are rotting in pak jails because of that.
Socail and economic fascit reasons ordained by the Brahmin cult..yeah now that is very racist. now wonder "fair and lovely " for men is selling like Hot cakes IN INDIA.
booz and sex is the main reason followeres practice islam.allha is sure the best salesman.he gives the best offer in the world.rivers of wines in golden cups,24 hours meat,72 virgin houris(why not virgin hunks for women?)palaces,silk clothings.loooooolz.what does islam has to offer to extraterrestrial i wonder.looolz
@Indiaexpress Not to mention every faggot as Hindu swamijis ever(who have given up desires and realised the Non-dual Self) has turned his ashram in brothel..the real essence of Hinduism.. to very Sex Swami that evey news publish to fucking bastard asshooles Like lord Rama (beheader of Low-caste)and Lord Krishna( rapist of more than 30,000 women).. I wonder the " Svarga" is only only for Brahmin men who have it all or cheap low birth men like you Indiaexpress..I dont wwant to be in Hindu "Naraga"
hahaha! u made rama a ghazi,krishna a rapist in your fantasy land.lol! hold on boy,krishna didnt had the libido of 30 men like muhammad as stated in hadiths.hahahah!
Good rama Beheaded a Low-caste man named Shamubuka Because he performed penanace, strict adherer of Manusmriti, lord Ram the beheader. If that asshole live today he will be serving life-sentence.
first of all,mausnriti was written by a sage called manu who had his own theory regarding the so called low castes.for your information he was the one who came up with the theory about brahmans coming from mouth of vishnu,warriors from hands and shudras from feet in some 100's of years after vedas were written.i agree that he was the ancient times hitler.
Well, I thought Manu was the first Man according to vedism and Brahma god of creation gave hime the Manusmriti as a guideline to the society. And that mouth..hands is from Vedas...Not mnausmriti. Manusmirti according the many hindus is the intrepretation of Socital law derived from vedas..So is Dharmashastra..All this book looks like witten by an ancient time hitler
so he was adam according to vedas?lol! looks like all the religions of world have a common source of stories lol! and no hand mouth theory isnt in vedas.
krishna is a rapist of 30,000 women!lol! u must have got this from the book 300 ramyan and mahabharata.lol! the earliest reference about wives of krishan states that these women were captured by jalasandh the king of U.P. and after killing him,these women are diwoned by their families(atleast not honor killing like islam)and then krishna married these women and let them live in the country as his wives.lol!how could he sleep with 30,000 women.he wasant free like huge hefner u know.
and u talik of rama killing his monkey friend's(i wonder what are the yeti,bigfoot and sasquatch that are seen today) brither vali.according to ramayan vali captured sugreeva's kingdom and made his wife captive.then rama killed him and mad sugreeva the king but made vali's son the heir to the throne.got it?
Why the hell are you keeping mum on Rama killing "Shambuka" a low caste for performing penance..probably the faggot ass mythological chracter like rama had a lot of chracter flaws, who brahmins defend till now, if you wanna know tamils dont respect rama some even worship ravana because of Lord Ram(beheader of low-caste).. With so much shit in hinduism you dont have right to criticize islam. and I am not pakistani
i already gave u the answer.theearliest known text ramayan doesnt speak of any shambuka.shambuka may be reffered in some texts written 100's of years after the ramayana was written.people should believe bible more or the passion of christ?
and dude,krishna rama noah,moses,abraham,jesus,these are not historical charcters.there is not suffecient proof that they existed.the bible is claimed to be wirtten sime 200 years after jesus's death.and for quran,it is derived from the bible and other abrahamic religions for the propangada of muhmmad who wanted to be conquerer of world and wanted arabians to rule others.
and the dravidian texts regarding shiva rama and krishna as divine beings spills out the hwole truth of your pakistan'a aryan dravidian war propaganda.
th whole world knows your muhammad used to have large no of personal slaves.why was he hesitating in abolishing slavery?because he was a busibnessman not a prophet.quran justifies keeping women as slves for sex.even muhammad himself had sex slaves.the names of these slaves are wriitten in hadith.he killed thousand of jews himself in the name of allha as they refuesd his dictatorship.he raided jewish caravans,killed men and made their wives concubines and children slaves of muslims.
he penetrated the vagina of aisha when she was just nine.aisha writes details on how muhammad used to have sex with her in the bathtub(islamic child porno lol)she writes how muhammad used to kiss her thighs and areas sourrounding vagina when she was menstruating.lol! so horney he was.
hadiths writes how he saw his daughter in law with skimpy clothes one day by mistake and then became so horney that he married her which was forbidden according to islam.arabian people also objected but he was a messanger.islamic laws can be moulded accorded to his wishes right.
@Indiaexpress atleast his wishes had thought of global brotherhood, unlike only a brahmin can marry 4 women from each caste, Kshastriya can marry 3 down the ladder..and sudra can marry one and dalit is forgetten..asshole. you belive in this pussy crabbs religion of hinduism and here to advise the Religion of warriors..huh?.. you backboneless bastrad after surrending 6 provinces of aryavartha..sud stay with your tail inbetween in your legs
lol! sudra can marry only one.hahaha! now u are one true faggot.sudras can marry as many women they like which was a priviledge only for muhammad according to islam. dalit and sudra are the same boy. and yes islam is a religion of war mongers. you said the truth for first time .
Really I dont see the dalit marrying a brahmin written good dharmashastra. The faggot Brahmins can marry 4 ... one from each below down.. we all Lord Krishna raped more than 300,000 women. now Imagine a blue Mutant raping a so many women. But nothing as disgusting as Lord Ram( The Beheader of Low caste) very racist fucker, killed even his own Monkey-general's Brother.
hahaha! u told u this?zaid hamid who wants to bring back the turkey islamic calipphate and wants to be khalifa.lol! and where did u get such things about rama and krishna?from some old follore right?hahahaha!
Type "Shamuka+Rama" in google search and you will find the bastard Lord Rama was a racist who murdered a poor low caste man for performing penance and covering that murder with lies like he was a Rakshah(Demon) in the previous birth. But even then what Lord Rama did was justice according to Brahminsm..because a Dalit or shudra(60% of hindus) cant learn from Vedas. Its fair skinned, Aryan featured Brahmins work to do that..No Dalits allowed inside a Temple.
lol!now u get it from where does th idea of heaven comes from eh? its a hindu legend. no heaven is not for humans,it is ahome of a demigod called indra,even sumericna speak of gods coming in flying palnes to earth from 'heaven'.
Thas why sumerians dont exist anymore. Brahmins didn't even leave the heaven part for dalits. The Brahmin "svarga" is a higher heaven and shudra cant even be there.. Hinduism= faggotism
the sumerians knew much more than your faggot muhammad.they knew about the the whole solar system when u were eating shit. the arabians also stole our sanskrit number system and term it as arabic numerals by destorting them.lol!
system like Hinduism says. Like the whole world was resting on a Naga(snakes) head.. fuckin 21st century and still homo like you belive that world is resting on a snakes Head. and Ganges river is from Lord head where the moon rests and He has a snake around his neck as well. I wonder Why Lord shiva sexual demolishes a Rishis Wife, and rishi cursed His Linga to fall off.. knowing his Linga would destroy earth Devi Shakti send her Yoni to save the universe. send a pussy to save the universe haha
lol! go on ! your papa zaid hamid must have told u these stories !hahaha! go on. i really like zaid hamid.he makes me laugh so much with his jokerly act. what school did he go?pakistan schhol of drama?
well. there can be lot of symbolism in thse puranic tales.soem says that churning of ocean by devtaas and asura were entirely depiction of natural events in a symbolic way. and lol! it was not shiva it was indra who did it.he is considered to be higher powerful being than humans but not 'divine and if people can believe that a islamic type heaven exists then they can believen absolutely anything.
there is no brahmin swarga ignorant.go on making your own stories.reincarnation is what we believe in as human soul is immoratal and free from worldly pleasures such as drinking wines and fucking houris idiot.
@Indiaexpress Soul of free asshole. Is svarga evern a sankrit words. I read that in Vishnu purana with all thode fagoot ideas by brahmins.. We all know vedic brahmins stole a lot of concept from carvaka, Buddhist and other anti-vedic concepts that rose in india and outlawed them. Sumerians My ass! You can eat dick with them.. free from worldy pleasures like faggot Swami nithyanada, swami premananda, swami rajneesh..all these soo called hindu holymen are sexual faggots!
no! immoratality of soul was hindu concept and souls dont drink wines and fuck virgins.buddah was himself a hindu.he jsut preached the athiest sect of hinduism as buddhism.dude,u cant compare hinduism with islam.hinduism more like the greek religion.and sumerians had much more knowledge then u arabians boy.they even knew about pluto 6000 years ago dude and give many more details about universe.your arabians couldnt built even one room like pyramids of giza.they are using sanskrit numrals.lol!
Haha..Typical Hindutva Bastard! Buddhism is hinduism, Sikhism is Hinduism haha.. You fuckers never get tires of propaganda. Buddhist and sikhs run away like running away from cheap dog when you say they are hindu.Except for thoese who follow the cheap book Vedas and manusmriti are hindus. Other religion in India are much better then Rat-Worshipping hinduism
lol! cause they are ignorant pal.but yes ,the concepts of immoratality of soul and reincarnation and karma are hindu concepts which were repeated by buddhism and sikhs.hinduism was a civilisation where they were many sects in ancient times.there was this sect of god worship like romans and there was this athiest sect which bhuddha preached and there was this one god sect which became sikhism and there was this 'pantheistic' sect which told that the universe itself is god.
They are not Ignorant..Its hindus who claim sikhs and buddhist are hindus are ignorant. Hinduism can be related to Vedas, when you reject the idea of "Inffalibilty of vedas" then your are follower of brahmnism no more. Buddha taught against the school of brahman..the idea of "Evil Brahmin" is all the buddhist texts. And Advaita is a Buddhist concept, nicely taken by Adi Shankra to innact inside hinduism and defeat buddhism. Pantheism or monism can only be equated with Atheism.
vedas are not only the only source of hinduism.there are various other sources like smrities ,shrutis,purans etc. and why do the sikhs use 'om' then which was earliest reference to which is in hinduism?how come bhuddhism preach the law if karma and reincarnation on which earliest accounts are hindu?
well people should have this debate,people should follow free thinking and not believe everything that are told to them.for example,there are a large number of similarities between the bible and other ancient religions.there are certain evidences found that bible could have been derived from ancient religions like mithraism.sumerian and hindu texts accounts for a world knows as heaven which is residence of gods enjoying pleasures.
lol! jsut like the veil brahmins ,the evil arabians too did a lot of propaganda for world power.lol! no onder zaid hamid is of arabian descent,destorting prohecies of hadees caliming the prohicised islamic states of islam with him as the khalifa and stories like gahzwa e hind.lol! true arabian.
your zaid hamid is now distorting the hadees propheies and making fool of pakistanis with his ghazwa e hind fantasy propangda.taliks of having war with america and israel at the sme time.lol! looks like there will be a gazwa e pakistan be combined forces of america israel india and russia and yes afghanistan too.lol!
islam was just a arabian propanganda for to establish their rule over large parts of world.they abolished the persian language in iran and enforced their arabic instead stating that god only understands arabic and all other languages are haraam.lol! then turk began to expand their empire confronting the higer muslims of arab and claiming the superiority of their culture over arab.now every mulsim country wants to take the lead.
"god only understands arabic" Funny I was thinking the same about Sanskrit. Why even in temples in South india, the mantras are read in Sanskrit and not Tamil or Telugu..what even tamil gods only understand Sanskrit, which is by all means the language of the Aryan-Brahmin invaders. And persian language was not abolished..It is called Farsi, Dari, baloch,pashto and it still spoken and The Official language on India under Mughal empire(1526-1857) was Persian not Arabic.
nobody 's denying the brahmin dicatorship in the indian subcontinent.i was jsut telling u islam was no different.but atleast the indian kings didnt sent armies to force peole to accept hinduism.ashoka didnt sent armies to preach buddhism in china.
Well, Buddhists were brutually forced to denouse buddhism and accept brahminism. After Adi shankar and his Brahmin co. succesfully stole the Buddhist concept of non-dualism(advaita) and rolled it with brahmin cloak. may hindu kings did force them to disband their religion. infact the major religion of indian subcontinent was Buddhism from 200 B.C to 800 A.D. do your research on this. As I said Brahmins did all kind of evil to stay in power.
lol! do u have any proof for this?lol! nothing.dont even know your own ancestory and then creating stories for which there is no written docuement present.
Ofcourse I do have proof for this ..world History...western or accepted version of history..You should read it sometimes..unless you only want the Ashram made History that will keep me a Nice Hindu faggot sucking Brahmins sausage.
this is the bitter truth.original muslims of arabia wanted to enslave other by making them muslims and serving the mecca medina.muhammad himself wanted an islamic empire with arabian governing the world.that was the true dream of muhammad. which now ironically no non arab muslim wants to see accomplished.
The Gandhara kingdom is further north-west. Mohen-jo-daro was not part of it although they were both part of the vedic civilization. Pashtuns were vedic people and belonged to Gandhara kingdom.
@nikhilyt I dont think so. Pashtuns moved later into this region. This region was inhabited by Hindu people. Only after loss of Jaypal in 1001 C.E pashtuns tribes started moving in. The earlier religion of pashtuns before Islam was Zorasteraism. Parsis as you may call it.
In any case Moenjodaro or Gandhara... BOTH HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH ISLAM
77vindiesel 8 months ago
that is the history, we cannot forget them, if we do the next generation can forget the same, what ever they did, by it with revolution, analysis and review only the modernity came ahead. Previous experience is always stepping stones to the future(success or failure).
People have migrated from one place to another for searching life(water or warriers based).
samareddys 9 months ago
go to site IISH and select lectures in english and "Science in Ancient India" lecture, u get the science and history there
samareddys 1 year ago
for the real history of Indian science please go through this site
named: Science in Ancient India get it , it even includes mathemetical science
samareddys 1 year ago
@samareddys "Ancient India" was Punjab and Sindh (Eastern Pakistan). The modern-day "India" has nothing to do with Moenjodaro.
Truth987Seeker 9 months ago
mohinjadarro was center of the IVC not the gandhara civilization
PakistaniShaheen 1 year ago
The archeological ruins at the City of the Dead (Moenjodaro) offer insight to urban planning in the Indus Valley, third century B.C.
IguanadonBlues 1 year ago
I feel Invade Pakistan and get our valuables & that part of land back from those uncivilized people..
banghacker 2 years ago
Comment removed
PakistaniShaheen 2 years ago
@banghacker you wanna invade Pakistan and get "your" valuables & land back? Come and get it we're ready to kick your balls (if you have any)
PakistaniShaheen 2 years ago
go back to your arabia ball less impotencs.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
@banghacker Being Historic and unbelivable cowards against muslim armies for over 800 years is what lost this land in the first place. Think again
hynixx 2 years ago
hahaha! dude, your own ancestors were fucked by arabian muslim army.why did u think they left their culture and become salves of arabs.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
@Indiaexpress I'd rather fucked by arabian army than evil vedic brahmin army and live as a Sudra or even worse dalit for all my life time. Me and my future generation can choose our vocation now.
hynixx 1 year ago
they treated u no less my boy.even till today,the arbs consider themselves and their culture highest among muslims.u dont know how they dont treat pak muslims with desrespect in arabia.they consider u inferior boy.nobody wanted to come under arab and islamic control. not even the own peopel of arabia.they captured the areas by conquest and oppression ,torture and rape and now propagating lies about pre islamic cultures.they treated u no less and even worse.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
What arabs treating muslims bad have to do with Islam. We all know todays Arabs are uneducated assholes with a IQ of a Cannoli. Non-arab muslims dont need arabs to say how to belive or behave. on the other hand Brahmins(so called born brilliant) higher caste people should thought about turning 30% of hindus into shudra and 26% in even worse-dalits. Belive me! Islam is a far better choice the be trapped at lower stratum of oppresive system and live with agony your children will suffer the same.
hynixx 1 year ago
arab army destroyed every pre islamic culture including yours by force,they raped and killed innocent women wnd children,imposed heavy taxes and restriction on people of middle east.they werent happy on conversion only.they wanted non arabs' submission of soverignity and wealth to arabs.read about brutal conquest of persia.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
You truly speak like one of the RSS/VHP indutva propaganda machine..nope arabs did not rule india..it was Afghans/tukic rule. Propably you want to look into your own ass- how did you become a Hindu..was there any Vedic aryan invasion subjacation/enslavemnt system. Before you go on with we of lies on others culture
hynixx 1 year ago
no there was never an aryan 'invasion'.if there had been the dravidian texts must have mentioned it.atleast a folklore should have been present but there is none.even the dravidians dont have any problems with aryans as there was never any fight.and yes afghan and turk.they themselves were invaded and plundered by arabs but later retaliated.the persians were forced to accept islam on sword.why would the persians wage war with arab if they wanted to?
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Ofcourse dravidian texts and even vedic texts mention it. pertianing to this video, inherent language of Mohaenjadro was ancient Tamil, still Brauhi ppl live there as evidence to this testament. As a typical Islam hater, you are still pressing on with Islam spread by Sword..blah blah..blah. True fact is Islam was spread mostly my islamic mystics(Sufis) and lower caste trying to escape opression of hinduism.
hynixx 1 year ago
lol! show me the proof then.and why me ,show those wise english historians who couldnt find any proof of aryan invasion.lol!
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
ancient tamil right,lol! hahaha!y speak as if all the wesetrn historians are stupid and only u are a wise man.lol! true follower of zaid hamid who lives in his fantasy world and wants to make an islamic empire putting himself as a khalifa.hahahahaha! nice stories pal.nice stories.go to hollywood.they are famous for their 'accurate' depiction of history
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Well! western Historian are much brighter than your guru Bal Thackrey the Historian and Billu the Barbariam. I would rather accept any monkeys history than a Hindutva faggots version of History. Hindusim= Opression
hynixx 1 year ago
who told u that he is our guru? he is just a politician!and who is the hell is billu?lol!are u retard?first get your zaid hamid treated who wants to become the khalifa.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
well these hindus were probably your ancestors boy.better accept it.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
I accept it and I am ashamed of it. Thanks to Islam for Liberating me. or else my history teacher will be Billu the lallu.
hynixx 1 year ago
lol! u should do some reaserch on how u became a muslim.a large part of pakis are succesors of those hindus who were forced into islam by sword or by heavy jiyaza and now ironically hate the hindu civilisation from which they hail just like the afghanistanis who bomb bamiyaan statues built by their own ancestors.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Then I wonder where south india , where there was no islamic invasion,while they still make a bulk of muslims? There was no islamic invasion in malabar,tamil nadu, still they make 25% of 10% of muslims..who forced them to accept islam I wonder?
hynixx 1 year ago
if isalm would have been spread by preaching not by armies then there was no problem but the arabians killed innocent,raped women,killed children looted wealth of middle east and then miidle east.why did the turks fight the arabs .they should have been friends right.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Turks never fought arabs.. I think you are mentioning Sasaniad persians fighting not the arabs ..but the arab muslims. They allied with Arab pagans to squash out islam at its infancy. Unfortunately for sasanaids, Eastern Romans god had a different plan.
hynixx 1 year ago
ever watched the movie 'lawrence of arabia' ?it will give u some idea on how turkey ottoman empire ended.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
@Indiaexpress The stupid arabs sided with Britsh and fought against Islamic Turks.. that will be the stupidest thing Arabs ever did.. Now they are reaping what they sowed in palestine.
hynixx 1 year ago
what about african conquest?muslims made slaves out of blacks.they werent given freedom even after accepting islam.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Muslims making slaves of out of Blacks is again misunderstood esp by islamophobics. Black ppl did not have any option other than slavery before islam..but during islam there were black slaves, but however they were allowed to become free at a price. Any muslim or balcks themselves can attain freedom..becoming free at some ransom.not to mention there were lot of black masters, scholors, religious thinkers in Islam, Unlike a Shudra or Dalit who has no hope even with lot of money to be free.
hynixx 1 year ago
they were allowed to be free at aprice,and those who couldnt afford it, they were destined to be slaves all their life under muslims right.and lol! sudra werent slaves,they were people with professions considered to be inferior.caste system took numerous years to establish,not like one had a dream one night and then sent his armies to suppress certain people.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Sudra has a profession of a Slave.. "meekly serve the upper caste" as it is said in racist Vedas..and I dont wanna bring manusmriti in this.. If Hitler would have read Manusmirti or Dharmashahstra..he would have felt like a baby. You know the verse in manusmirti which says" to chop the Anus of Low caste if he Farts in front of a High Caste" ..seriously man..if Hindu fuckers version of history is to be accepted.. we will all be tricked by goons smokin weed to acheive enlightenment.
hynixx 1 year ago
hahaha! go on making stories.vedas are collection of hymns not rule book on how to kill jews and infidels ok! now go and fantacise about drinking wines and fucking virgin bouris of heaven. adios.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
lol!that is great,first make slaves out of people then demand money for freeing them.lol!
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
afghans are illetrate pepel.they dont know anything about their history including u.afghan was seized by greek army.they were looting the people there and dstroying their buddhist culture.chandra gupta maurya gave them freedom from greeks.even persia gained freedom from greeks as result.people of middle east would've been free today from the unwanted islam if mauryan empirehadnt broken down.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Seriously how old are you?.. The time of alexanders invasion &maurayan empire time(320 B.C) and the spread of buddhism in afghanistan(200 A.D.) were different ages. You dont want Islam does not mean any Afghans dont want to be Muslim. Afghans before Islam were mostly Zorastrians. The Brahminism idea of few pure race people who dont mix/marry with other wont have selled in islamic age and atleast muslims liberted the north-west india from few, cunning, subversive, lying brahmins.
hynixx 1 year ago
200 A.D lol! the bamiyaan staues were made under the reign of ashoka in afghanistan during mauryan empire in 300 bc..zoroastrian were persians.lol! u are one ignorant man.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
And please Bitch! Asoka did not built the buddhas..what a fucking ignorant dolt..you are..check wikipedia. And afghans are eastern persians..are you total that dumb! iranians, afghans, baloch, Tajik all belong to the persian language/religion. You can even ask your History book author Narendra Modi or Bal thackrey.
hynixx 1 year ago
then who built it bitch?your momma?afghan was under mauryan empire in 300 bc.now as a moron u are u will now refuse it too.now u will say even elexander didnt invade afgahn.lol!
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
@Indiaexpress What a faggot bitch are you? Buddha statues was built by buddhist monks during 200 A.D asshole. you are in information age numbnuts! why dont you google. I know you will laugh on Accepted world history. Ashram History!Yeah. Homo. Vedic hyms inevitable asks hindus to look down upon low castes, Attest SATI.many hyms asks for giving birth to a son and curse women with birth of baby girl. Yeah faggot, I would rather Drink wine andfuck houris than be abused by Swami Nithayanda alive!
hynixx 1 year ago
hahaha! now the monks who used to beg for food built the bamiyaan statues.hahhahaha! no there are no such hymns. sati was not practiced in south. why?lol! it was a cult practice of remote parts of north india asshole.there was no caste system in vedic period but of course u wont accept it.and yes i'm a homo.what would your islamic god do?burn me in hell till my skin drops off?lol!
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
@Indiaexpress No Homo asshole! Now you are trapped bastard! What if I produce you the Rig vedic (assholes book) verses which condone SATI faggot! homo will you accept SATI was Inherent of Vedic Hindusim.. Ok Now go to (RV 10.18.7) and (RV 10.18.8). where the Vedic got gets a orgasm by burning Women. SATI was practised everywhere in Aryavarta..not the south indians(Drravidian) people.. Dravidian( low caste) people are much brighter, intelligent than north indian Filth like You!
hynixx 1 year ago
hahahaha! so there are no brahmins shatriyas(warriors) and vishyas(traders) in dravidians.lol! hahaha! go on .lol!
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
hahahaha! why the hell do u want to make a mockery of yourself?the first verse states that widows should come besides the pyre of her husband(unlit ofcourse)not immolate herself in it. and the next verse states that the women after pyre is lit should go back to their houses.lol! the earliest record of the term 'sati' is parvati who jumped in the yagya fire of havan of her father to impure it as he didnt invite her husband shiva into the ceremony.and yes shiva was alive then.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
No fucker read the verse on SATI again and dont use typical hindu lie and deception here. Another verse from Vishnusmriti "Now the duties of a woman are ... After the death of her husband, to preserve her chastity, or to ascend the pile after him" how can you mistranlate this and Rigvedic one "Let these wives first step into the pyre, tearless without any affliction and well adorned" Step into the pyre means moving into burning pile of husband. Its always god get away with murder,women cant.
hynixx 1 year ago
i went to wikipedia.they clearly stated what's the story from which the word sati is taken from and the verse which u are talking of are ambiguous.if sati was such an imporatant ritual in vedic times than they should have had a individual separate book for this.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
@Indiaexpress Ofcourse Sati was important as in dhramashastras.. Basic verses taken from vedas and interpreted by sages like Manu, apastama, gautama, Vashista, Baudhayana, narada,brihaspati..all these sages attested SATI as the right thing to do inorder to aviod doubt on their chastity after their husbands have passed away.. Alexander the great and his Greeks thought of SATI as a practise by hindus to stop women from poisoning their husbands.
hynixx 1 year ago
and again dravidians(low caste)lol! who are the priests that do prayers in balaji temples.who were those warriors under chola empire?who were the cholas.lol! now i'm gonna burst laughing. low caste are u non arab muslims which wwere considered inferior by muhmamad.hindu coverts although accepted islam but were terated as dogs by the more superior arabs and turks.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Yet another Bal thackrey's student assumtions. Muslims are mistreated by arabs??faggot. It will be great to live free in the homeland and libertated Low-caste( Convert to Islam, Christianity) than to live like Dog in homeland as dalits. During the Sultante and Mughal, Shudras and dalit were given position in government as good as Police cheif, governing a Misl. given the choice of being slave in their homeland or live with honor(convert to islam) many low-caste chose a better offer.
hynixx 1 year ago
well maybe small posts but higher power always rested in hands of the pure turks and not all were given special treatments,majority of them were forced into salvery for which they world be released only after getting money. so they terated u no better.and a large part of low cates had become farmers even before islamic invasion out of which the turks used to wage a large sum of taxes on not getting of which they uesd to take their women as captives.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
@Indiaexpress There was nothing like pure turks after babar. They mixed with hindu rajput/brahmin women so much..that later mugals like jalaludin akbar started looking like Indian mixed with turkic.
hynixx 1 year ago
and again dravidians(low caste)lol! who are the priests that do prayers in balaji temples.who were those warriors under chola empire?who were the cholas.lol! now i'm gonna burst laughing. low caste are u non arab muslims which wwere considered inferior by muhmamad.hindu coverts although accepted islam but were terated as dogs by the more superior arabs and turks.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
faggot.female infanticide also used to happen in arabia but of course u wont accept it.hahah! hinduism regard girls as divine my boy.infanticide was practiced jst for economic and social reasons not religious. what about the huddod law of islam ij which rape victim has to provide 4 'male' witnesses(why not female?) or else she is imprisoned today in pak ?
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
@Indiaexpress Female infencticide used to happen in Pre-Islamic arabic faggot(Jahalliya) as muslims call it. Not like to day in Punjab haryana..where for every male is 1000 and female is 872.. Hindu Religion sanctioned murder of female child explicitly.. till now this is practised..where hindu father always wishes a Male child to boast his position in Hindu society. Just to cleanse him for the curse Dowry was made. Female child as a curse is a typical Vedic Brahminism theory.
hynixx 1 year ago
yes but that's for social and economic reasons as i already told u. and as i can see u didnt addresses ny comment on hudood law of pak.why,no answers?
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
go on boy,save your mother from hudood law in pak.always have 4 males compaony her incase she gets raped she doesnt spend the rest of her life in jail or the worse be stoned to death .
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Man you must save your mother from being forced into funeral pyre..Incase your daddy dies. SATI is lovely law of lovely hinduism which gives equal rights to women=my ass. Nice vedic hym ordering women to be good hindu women and kill themselves - "Let these women, whose husbands are worthy and are living, enter the house with ghee (applied) as collyrium (to their eyes). Let these wives first step into the pyre, tearless without any affliction and well adorned" RV 10.18.7.
hynixx 1 year ago
lol! jsut lol! there is no sati system practised in india today pal.our media is not like your pakistanis which curb the news of balichis being killed by pak army on the commands of musharraf. hudood law is still practised in pak and thousands of women are rotting in pak jails because of that.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Socail and economic fascit reasons ordained by the Brahmin cult..yeah now that is very racist. now wonder "fair and lovely " for men is selling like Hot cakes IN INDIA.
hynixx 1 year ago
hahahah! watch this its funny as hell.
watch?v=AfF9v3VtC4g
watch?v=lv_rvgZdhCs
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
watch?v=WBxy1R0jitM
watch?v=G1l-x7708zY not that funny as the you posted. but still brings the Irony of Brahminism.
hynixx 1 year ago
booz and sex is the main reason followeres practice islam.allha is sure the best salesman.he gives the best offer in the world.rivers of wines in golden cups,24 hours meat,72 virgin houris(why not virgin hunks for women?)palaces,silk clothings.loooooolz.what does islam has to offer to extraterrestrial i wonder.looolz
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
@Indiaexpress Not to mention every faggot as Hindu swamijis ever(who have given up desires and realised the Non-dual Self) has turned his ashram in brothel..the real essence of Hinduism.. to very Sex Swami that evey news publish to fucking bastard asshooles Like lord Rama (beheader of Low-caste)and Lord Krishna( rapist of more than 30,000 women).. I wonder the " Svarga" is only only for Brahmin men who have it all or cheap low birth men like you Indiaexpress..I dont wwant to be in Hindu "Naraga"
hynixx 1 year ago
hahaha! u made rama a ghazi,krishna a rapist in your fantasy land.lol! hold on boy,krishna didnt had the libido of 30 men like muhammad as stated in hadiths.hahahah!
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Good rama Beheaded a Low-caste man named Shamubuka Because he performed penanace, strict adherer of Manusmriti, lord Ram the beheader. If that asshole live today he will be serving life-sentence.
hynixx 1 year ago
first of all,mausnriti was written by a sage called manu who had his own theory regarding the so called low castes.for your information he was the one who came up with the theory about brahmans coming from mouth of vishnu,warriors from hands and shudras from feet in some 100's of years after vedas were written.i agree that he was the ancient times hitler.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Well, I thought Manu was the first Man according to vedism and Brahma god of creation gave hime the Manusmriti as a guideline to the society. And that mouth..hands is from Vedas...Not mnausmriti. Manusmirti according the many hindus is the intrepretation of Socital law derived from vedas..So is Dharmashastra..All this book looks like witten by an ancient time hitler
hynixx 1 year ago
so he was adam according to vedas?lol! looks like all the religions of world have a common source of stories lol! and no hand mouth theory isnt in vedas.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
@Indiaexpress Manu is the first human according to vedas isnt he? and brahma gave him the law of social order.
hynixx 1 year ago
krishna is a rapist of 30,000 women!lol! u must have got this from the book 300 ramyan and mahabharata.lol! the earliest reference about wives of krishan states that these women were captured by jalasandh the king of U.P. and after killing him,these women are diwoned by their families(atleast not honor killing like islam)and then krishna married these women and let them live in the country as his wives.lol!how could he sleep with 30,000 women.he wasant free like huge hefner u know.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
and u talik of rama killing his monkey friend's(i wonder what are the yeti,bigfoot and sasquatch that are seen today) brither vali.according to ramayan vali captured sugreeva's kingdom and made his wife captive.then rama killed him and mad sugreeva the king but made vali's son the heir to the throne.got it?
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Why the hell are you keeping mum on Rama killing "Shambuka" a low caste for performing penance..probably the faggot ass mythological chracter like rama had a lot of chracter flaws, who brahmins defend till now, if you wanna know tamils dont respect rama some even worship ravana because of Lord Ram(beheader of low-caste).. With so much shit in hinduism you dont have right to criticize islam. and I am not pakistani
hynixx 1 year ago
i already gave u the answer.theearliest known text ramayan doesnt speak of any shambuka.shambuka may be reffered in some texts written 100's of years after the ramayana was written.people should believe bible more or the passion of christ?
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
and dude,krishna rama noah,moses,abraham,jesus,these are not historical charcters.there is not suffecient proof that they existed.the bible is claimed to be wirtten sime 200 years after jesus's death.and for quran,it is derived from the bible and other abrahamic religions for the propangada of muhmmad who wanted to be conquerer of world and wanted arabians to rule others.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
and please! the story of sambhuka is an old legend which doesnt have any legitimate wriiten account .its just a legend boy,just a legend.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
and the dravidian texts regarding shiva rama and krishna as divine beings spills out the hwole truth of your pakistan'a aryan dravidian war propaganda.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
th whole world knows your muhammad used to have large no of personal slaves.why was he hesitating in abolishing slavery?because he was a busibnessman not a prophet.quran justifies keeping women as slves for sex.even muhammad himself had sex slaves.the names of these slaves are wriitten in hadith.he killed thousand of jews himself in the name of allha as they refuesd his dictatorship.he raided jewish caravans,killed men and made their wives concubines and children slaves of muslims.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
he penetrated the vagina of aisha when she was just nine.aisha writes details on how muhammad used to have sex with her in the bathtub(islamic child porno lol)she writes how muhammad used to kiss her thighs and areas sourrounding vagina when she was menstruating.lol! so horney he was.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
hadiths writes how he saw his daughter in law with skimpy clothes one day by mistake and then became so horney that he married her which was forbidden according to islam.arabian people also objected but he was a messanger.islamic laws can be moulded accorded to his wishes right.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
@Indiaexpress atleast his wishes had thought of global brotherhood, unlike only a brahmin can marry 4 women from each caste, Kshastriya can marry 3 down the ladder..and sudra can marry one and dalit is forgetten..asshole. you belive in this pussy crabbs religion of hinduism and here to advise the Religion of warriors..huh?.. you backboneless bastrad after surrending 6 provinces of aryavartha..sud stay with your tail inbetween in your legs
hynixx 1 year ago
lol! sudra can marry only one.hahaha! now u are one true faggot.sudras can marry as many women they like which was a priviledge only for muhammad according to islam. dalit and sudra are the same boy. and yes islam is a religion of war mongers. you said the truth for first time .
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Really I dont see the dalit marrying a brahmin written good dharmashastra. The faggot Brahmins can marry 4 ... one from each below down.. we all Lord Krishna raped more than 300,000 women. now Imagine a blue Mutant raping a so many women. But nothing as disgusting as Lord Ram( The Beheader of Low caste) very racist fucker, killed even his own Monkey-general's Brother.
hynixx 1 year ago
hahaha! u told u this?zaid hamid who wants to bring back the turkey islamic calipphate and wants to be khalifa.lol! and where did u get such things about rama and krishna?from some old follore right?hahahaha!
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Type "Shamuka+Rama" in google search and you will find the bastard Lord Rama was a racist who murdered a poor low caste man for performing penance and covering that murder with lies like he was a Rakshah(Demon) in the previous birth. But even then what Lord Rama did was justice according to Brahminsm..because a Dalit or shudra(60% of hindus) cant learn from Vedas. Its fair skinned, Aryan featured Brahmins work to do that..No Dalits allowed inside a Temple.
hynixx 1 year ago
lol!now u get it from where does th idea of heaven comes from eh? its a hindu legend. no heaven is not for humans,it is ahome of a demigod called indra,even sumericna speak of gods coming in flying palnes to earth from 'heaven'.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Thas why sumerians dont exist anymore. Brahmins didn't even leave the heaven part for dalits. The Brahmin "svarga" is a higher heaven and shudra cant even be there.. Hinduism= faggotism
hynixx 1 year ago
the sumerians knew much more than your faggot muhammad.they knew about the the whole solar system when u were eating shit. the arabians also stole our sanskrit number system and term it as arabic numerals by destorting them.lol!
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
system like Hinduism says. Like the whole world was resting on a Naga(snakes) head.. fuckin 21st century and still homo like you belive that world is resting on a snakes Head. and Ganges river is from Lord head where the moon rests and He has a snake around his neck as well. I wonder Why Lord shiva sexual demolishes a Rishis Wife, and rishi cursed His Linga to fall off.. knowing his Linga would destroy earth Devi Shakti send her Yoni to save the universe. send a pussy to save the universe haha
hynixx 1 year ago
lol! go on ! your papa zaid hamid must have told u these stories !hahaha! go on. i really like zaid hamid.he makes me laugh so much with his jokerly act. what school did he go?pakistan schhol of drama?
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
well. there can be lot of symbolism in thse puranic tales.soem says that churning of ocean by devtaas and asura were entirely depiction of natural events in a symbolic way. and lol! it was not shiva it was indra who did it.he is considered to be higher powerful being than humans but not 'divine and if people can believe that a islamic type heaven exists then they can believen absolutely anything.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
there is no brahmin swarga ignorant.go on making your own stories.reincarnation is what we believe in as human soul is immoratal and free from worldly pleasures such as drinking wines and fucking houris idiot.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
@Indiaexpress Soul of free asshole. Is svarga evern a sankrit words. I read that in Vishnu purana with all thode fagoot ideas by brahmins.. We all know vedic brahmins stole a lot of concept from carvaka, Buddhist and other anti-vedic concepts that rose in india and outlawed them. Sumerians My ass! You can eat dick with them.. free from worldy pleasures like faggot Swami nithyanada, swami premananda, swami rajneesh..all these soo called hindu holymen are sexual faggots!
hynixx 1 year ago
no! immoratality of soul was hindu concept and souls dont drink wines and fuck virgins.buddah was himself a hindu.he jsut preached the athiest sect of hinduism as buddhism.dude,u cant compare hinduism with islam.hinduism more like the greek religion.and sumerians had much more knowledge then u arabians boy.they even knew about pluto 6000 years ago dude and give many more details about universe.your arabians couldnt built even one room like pyramids of giza.they are using sanskrit numrals.lol!
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Haha..Typical Hindutva Bastard! Buddhism is hinduism, Sikhism is Hinduism haha.. You fuckers never get tires of propaganda. Buddhist and sikhs run away like running away from cheap dog when you say they are hindu.Except for thoese who follow the cheap book Vedas and manusmriti are hindus. Other religion in India are much better then Rat-Worshipping hinduism
hynixx 1 year ago
lol! cause they are ignorant pal.but yes ,the concepts of immoratality of soul and reincarnation and karma are hindu concepts which were repeated by buddhism and sikhs.hinduism was a civilisation where they were many sects in ancient times.there was this sect of god worship like romans and there was this athiest sect which bhuddha preached and there was this one god sect which became sikhism and there was this 'pantheistic' sect which told that the universe itself is god.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
They are not Ignorant..Its hindus who claim sikhs and buddhist are hindus are ignorant. Hinduism can be related to Vedas, when you reject the idea of "Inffalibilty of vedas" then your are follower of brahmnism no more. Buddha taught against the school of brahman..the idea of "Evil Brahmin" is all the buddhist texts. And Advaita is a Buddhist concept, nicely taken by Adi Shankra to innact inside hinduism and defeat buddhism. Pantheism or monism can only be equated with Atheism.
hynixx 1 year ago
vedas are not only the only source of hinduism.there are various other sources like smrities ,shrutis,purans etc. and why do the sikhs use 'om' then which was earliest reference to which is in hinduism?how come bhuddhism preach the law if karma and reincarnation on which earliest accounts are hindu?
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
well people should have this debate,people should follow free thinking and not believe everything that are told to them.for example,there are a large number of similarities between the bible and other ancient religions.there are certain evidences found that bible could have been derived from ancient religions like mithraism.sumerian and hindu texts accounts for a world knows as heaven which is residence of gods enjoying pleasures.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
lol! jsut like the veil brahmins ,the evil arabians too did a lot of propaganda for world power.lol! no onder zaid hamid is of arabian descent,destorting prohecies of hadees caliming the prohicised islamic states of islam with him as the khalifa and stories like gahzwa e hind.lol! true arabian.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
your zaid hamid is now distorting the hadees propheies and making fool of pakistanis with his ghazwa e hind fantasy propangda.taliks of having war with america and israel at the sme time.lol! looks like there will be a gazwa e pakistan be combined forces of america israel india and russia and yes afghanistan too.lol!
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
zaid hamid fpr president!!! we all indians are with u! gazwa e pakistan insha allah will be a reality under sir zaid hamid.lol!
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
islam was just a arabian propanganda for to establish their rule over large parts of world.they abolished the persian language in iran and enforced their arabic instead stating that god only understands arabic and all other languages are haraam.lol! then turk began to expand their empire confronting the higer muslims of arab and claiming the superiority of their culture over arab.now every mulsim country wants to take the lead.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
"god only understands arabic" Funny I was thinking the same about Sanskrit. Why even in temples in South india, the mantras are read in Sanskrit and not Tamil or Telugu..what even tamil gods only understand Sanskrit, which is by all means the language of the Aryan-Brahmin invaders. And persian language was not abolished..It is called Farsi, Dari, baloch,pashto and it still spoken and The Official language on India under Mughal empire(1526-1857) was Persian not Arabic.
hynixx 1 year ago
nobody 's denying the brahmin dicatorship in the indian subcontinent.i was jsut telling u islam was no different.but atleast the indian kings didnt sent armies to force peole to accept hinduism.ashoka didnt sent armies to preach buddhism in china.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Well, Buddhists were brutually forced to denouse buddhism and accept brahminism. After Adi shankar and his Brahmin co. succesfully stole the Buddhist concept of non-dualism(advaita) and rolled it with brahmin cloak. may hindu kings did force them to disband their religion. infact the major religion of indian subcontinent was Buddhism from 200 B.C to 800 A.D. do your research on this. As I said Brahmins did all kind of evil to stay in power.
hynixx 1 year ago
lol! do u have any proof for this?lol! nothing.dont even know your own ancestory and then creating stories for which there is no written docuement present.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
Ofcourse I do have proof for this ..world History...western or accepted version of history..You should read it sometimes..unless you only want the Ashram made History that will keep me a Nice Hindu faggot sucking Brahmins sausage.
hynixx 1 year ago
hahahaha! world history !hahahaha!.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
this is the bitter truth.original muslims of arabia wanted to enslave other by making them muslims and serving the mecca medina.muhammad himself wanted an islamic empire with arabian governing the world.that was the true dream of muhammad. which now ironically no non arab muslim wants to see accomplished.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
hahaha! dude, your own ancestors were fucked by arabian muslim army.why did u think they left their culture and become salves of arabs.
Indiaexpress 1 year ago
The Gandhara kingdom is further north-west. Mohen-jo-daro was not part of it although they were both part of the vedic civilization. Pashtuns were vedic people and belonged to Gandhara kingdom.
nikhilyt 2 years ago 2
@nikhilyt I dont think so. Pashtuns moved later into this region. This region was inhabited by Hindu people. Only after loss of Jaypal in 1001 C.E pashtuns tribes started moving in. The earlier religion of pashtuns before Islam was Zorasteraism. Parsis as you may call it.
hynixx 2 years ago
Please don't play Arabic music!!
m666under 3 years ago
i went to mohen jo daro aur mera pass meusem ki pics bhi hai jo mien ne chupke se clik ki thi hihii
SunnyCapricon 3 years ago
nice, plz upload more
Tazgam 4 years ago
Thankyou... you can find ore movies here on my vedios
SadiqIshaqShah 4 years ago