It's a terribly SIMPLE reason. It would've been "unsinkable" if they hadn't found out a new and more efficient way of making steel. It was easier to do and they thought it made it stronger, when infact it made the steel weaker; That's why the iceberg broke through it so easily.
Personally, I think the sinking of the Titanic was an "inside job", carried out by Elvis, Shergar and Lord Lucan, funded by the Mafia, and orchestrated by the same people who faked the moon landings.
I think it could've been avoided if they steered the ship to hit the ice berg head on instead of steering it to the left and making it scrape its side. If it had hit head on, maybe it could have just pushed the ship and made it stop....i believe that sounds reasonable.
@xicahoney01 it sounds easy to dodge an iceberg, but the titanic was going at 23 knots (25m/ph or something) and thats quite fast for a very bif boat. the people in the crows nest had to use there eyesight (not binoculars, they didnt have any) and it was very dark. so the iceberg wasnt far and they spotted it. they would have dodged it if jack phillips didnt shout abuse to them (the california boat warned them) i underrstand jack though as he was in panic sending sos calls.
@xicahoney01 also ismay forced the captain (using his position in the 'white star line' company) to go faster so they could get to newyork 2 days earliar. but if they ignored ismay and carried on at there own pace they would've have been 2 days late, but everyones lives would be spared. i know im giving you a history lesson (lol) but its hard to dodge and iceberg:/
@kekahkooproductions Thanks!! That makes sense, there are so many theories and speculations about the Titanics' historic tragedy, also have you read a book called "The Titanic Murders"? If you're as fascinated like me about the Titanic I strongly recommend it. That's how I learned about a lot of important real characters from the Titanic. I can't recall the authors name but it's based on fiction/nonfiction. I wonder if they'll ever try to raise the Titanic in the future with more technology???
@xicahoney01 yess yess, i agree:D at the time they wouldnt have thought of any of these theories (as you wouldnt really) andd noo im sorry i havent read the book:( do you know where you can get it???? cos recently i have been a HUGE titanic fan (even though im quite young) and app they are making a new titanic for next year in April (100th anniversary of titanic sinking) and do the same route again!! and when they past the area the titanic sink, they are doing a memorial service:D thankss :D!!!!
@kekahkooproductions Hey !!! I have a question how old are u?im pretty young too...anyways the book is called the titanic murders and its by max allan collins..u can rent it at the public library thats where I got it at. and yea I heard about that too but I heard that they were going to make another movie like the titanic sequel and its gonna star leonardo di caprio (jack) and rose again!!
@xicahoney01 That's exactly right. If they had just steered straight into the iceberg, they would have had some frontal damage, and a few of the compartments would have flooded, but nothing bad. They would have been able to fix it up again at Belfast. But, because they turned and the iceberg put a 300ft hole into the starboard side, there was nothing they could do.
@Emmerlii EXACTLY!!! thank you...yea I think that if it would have hit in the front it could have had some damage, but no as much as to have sink the boat. I also heard that I the ship could have arrived safely even though it had water if only they had closed the most important doors first instead of closing them all at the same time...idk its just so sad that it could have been prevented and we could have avoided such tragedy!! :(
@Tailobol dude did you listen to me?first of all its IMPOSSIBLE for a 30.000 ton back to get in 30 degree against gravity itself and you must even thing about the 1500 people that where on here back at that time she probably could not hold it at more than max 15-25 degree cause i mean it 30.000 ton + 1500 people(=60 to 80 kg for every people on board at that time =90 to 120 ton in total,so that kinda A LOT! and thing about what they wearing at that time cause that could get to a nice extra 2ton)
@Tailobol your an idiot! you can't try to prove anything with that!cause titanic was still a ship made in 1910 most was with machine but still some with hand and what your talking about is about a ship thats like made in 2000!we now have better ships that can take more than the ship's in 1910 could!titanic was outside of steel but inside of wood so that breaks easy,but the ships today are almost from top to bottom made out of steel and im a 100% sure a tanker is made 100% out of steel.
Okay, the Titanic did not break in half the same way as in the movie. Th engine weighed many tons and therefore Titanic would have broken at a shallower angle. Instead of over 30 degrees as in the movie, the ship would have broken at about 11 degrees. There is no way the ship would have been able to get so high of an angle with so heave of an engine.
@sinkingship5 first in the movie the ship was only at an angle of 6 degree but they ditagly add more so it was not 6 not 30 but 45 degrees and that indeed is impsossible cause the back 30.000 ton so i think he cracked at an 15-25 degree that could look for the survivors like it was realy high and made them possible thing 30-40 dergree
If Titanic hadn't of broken then she would have stayed afloat in a idle position long enough for all the people to be saved by Carpathia. But the breaking caused to sink extremely fast.
@Titanicluver321 No it would not! The ship was being dragged down into the ocean by it's bow. If the ship never broke in half the ship would have been dragged down be the bow the whole way down, migh even been fully vertical at one point. It would have been pulled on an angle until it was fully in the ocean, then it probibly would have leveled out and came to a crash at the bottom on the ocean.
Okay first of all I am an expert on the Titanic. Alot of people suffered and died in this tragic disaster so lets be serious and not making jokes about it like Megamanfan111 is. Okay Titanic hit an iceberg, and then she sank from the bow. However, it is still not completely sure how or when it broke up and thats what everyone is trying to figure out.
@sinkingship5 Well duh alot of people died. i know everything there is to know about the R.M.S. Titanic. Of course she broke right between the third and fourth funnel. Because Titanic had a gap in her hull structure so that she could move with the waves that weakened the ship when it came to sinking. The gap couldnt hold the approximet weight of the Titanic which was 48,000 tons. So of course she broke. so she broke the same was as in the movie Titanic in 1997.
=Chaterton and ol Richie had bad weather sunk all their money in this expedition,got a dive or two in ,less than planned on. to sell the show on this already as said known part they made this already known great find,these two are the biggest blow hard nobody's in diving history and worshiped as gods to the few that follow their every foots step
go to the keys and teach rebreather tecs to fools that will pay you way too much for the star factor!
guys its easy!!! if u really wanna see how the titanic really sank, just borrow doc browns time machine and go back to 1912! but then again if u do that u might as well just save the titanc from sinking and change the course of history and cause a major time.....whatever he calls it in the back to the future movies lol
@lordAKiraAndou ffs he was only saying what he thought big deal he was wrong get a fuking grip a urself and stop insulting people for no reason atall... prick
mrjamesbomb1, WWII was started in 1939 and ended by 1946 in the pacific. Titanic sank in 1912 and there was numerous reports that Titanic hit an ice berg. Germans didnt sink her. They had no need to. The Lusitania & Mauritania was built to steal the blue ribband from the germans. Not Olympic/Titanic.
@mrjamesbomb1 How the hell could the germans possibly have sunk it? If a german torpedo hit it, we would have known that when sonar scans were sent down there. There are images of the tear in her side that prove it was an iceberg. I have no idea what so ever where you got the idea that germans did that.
man.... if ur gonna comment on a titanic sinking at least b sure to get the facts rite ww1 started 2 years after the titanic sank (1914) u must b getting confused with the lusitania
Parasol, nope this isnt new evidence. The double bottom was known to exsist where they found it in this video back in the mid 1990`s when they did a sonar scan of the wreck area. No one just investigated it. In the end I havent watched the video but I know they are putting forth their bottom up break. In the end I put zero faith in this new theory. This bottom piece could have got pulled off the ship after she broke her back and sank beneath the waves and ended up where it is today.
@Megamanfan111 thats funny because i typed in on google "can a megalodon sink the titanic" and i didnt find anything so i typed in titanic of youtube and this vid poped up and i saw your comment :P. btw i got a good megalodon fact video on my youtube channel.
and the titanic was not built well, it only had one lair of steel, the strongest part was the front, though, so if it hit there, it would've sank slower... i found that out at the titanic museaum- newfounland
it got bit in two by a godzillasaurus that was sleeping in cryogenic suspension and released from the ice berg by the titanic. New evidence, I am not wearing any pants....film at eleven!
There's no mystery as to why the Titanic broke in two. The weight from the bow pulled the ship down and the the ship was too long and fragile to stay in one piece.
The captain is not guilty. The vessel went not in full operation.
And very much has not carried - the iceberg was very dark (It is a kind of black icebergs which turn over also an edge does not stiffen инием), no in sky the moon and waves (Would be waves - round an iceberg would be a lamb).
Also, the design of the ship was flawed in that the "water stops" didnt go all the way to cieling so water flowed over and over each. It would NOT have sunk if the water stops went to cieling... as well as many other combination of things contributed to this disaster. But that is WHY it actually sunk... The REASON for taking on water was the iceberg. The FAULT was the captains (sorry, but true)for refusing to slow down when they warned of icebergs.
Preventions of icebergs were feature, them вегда was much. The captain has not dispersed a steamship, 2 coppers did not work. It was a proskating rink of engines. Besides, the course was still to the south and longer usual. It was made by the captain to provide safety.
I do not see its fault, I see fault of circumstances - no the moon, waves (a lamb from iceberg it is not visible) and imperfect laws of a radio communication and equipment by boats of steamships in that century.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
first of all, there not "water stops." obveously, you no nothing about ship building. secondly, the disaster was because of the ship being too big and she had too small of a rudder
Well, as long as were being RUDE... Obviously YOU KNOW NOTHING about the Titanic... the Titanic DID in fact have soemthing like water stops. I dont know if they called them "water stops" or not, but the Titanic, for a fact, had them. So, like the word or not, the Titanic had them... and if they were buit to the cieling the Titanic wold not have completely sunk. Thats a fact. So Fuck off! :) lol
yes this is true they werent sealed off they were like an ice tray in the freezer by filling one square it over flows filling the others and thats wat made it sink.
In addition... There were MANY, many factors involved that contributed to the Titanic not just one detail as you stated. Just the fact that Titanic had a small rudder isnt the REASOn for the disaster... as was my whole point on my original statement. Oh... and my explaination on the waterstops arent MY IDEAS, they are the opinions of scientists that studied the tragedy, I didnt make it up.
Wow you're a complete retard. The captain wasn't even on deck when the iceberg was spotted (about 1.30 am)! Plus the lookout\s binoculars had gone missing that particular night.
no the cpatain of the ship was asleep and even if he was there he still wouldn't have been held responsible. The crows nest binoculars went missing and therefore the equipment on the crows nest was inadiquate to see the iceberg until it was too late. Also there was no water breaking at the ice burg, so it was like seeing a smaller vessel with no lights and painted black. Sort of like a ghost iceburg.
Smith does everything he can to make much people survive, and you say this! There were 2 lookouts and they see the iceberg too late, the ship was turning when she hits the iceberg!
the whole titanic was a beauty!whenever i watch this i feel some kind of pain in my heart!!its a beautiful model!!and i feel really sad such a beauty broke and so many peole died!
It would probably just have gone on to get scrapped during the war... a bigger ship would have been built in the meantime and Titanic's fame would just die quite quickly.
I hate silly sensationalist presentations on the subject. I also really, really dislike it when people like Dirtboy101 resort to histrionics and racism to try and make the Titanic sound more important than it was, when it was already a pretty significant event with regards to shipping regulations and society in general...
I got news for you, Richie - it hit a big fucking bit of ice, started sucking up water, and BOOM. BYE BYE. FUCKIN' END OF STORY. Go play Warhammer or something...
NO. Forced female circumcision is immoral and unethical. Runaway spending on 'defense' is immoral and unethical. There are a million and one things worse than my comment.
You racist prat. I dare say 'France' has had a bigger, more necessary role in history than your entire family...
'Unethical' is what islam and moslems do to themselves and us kuffar, the non moslems. You see, they'll slice your head off just because you don't believe in their cocksucker, allah, or their pedophile prophet, mohammad, the pig shit of eternity. THAT is unethical.
It was an interesting episode but I think people should now let it rest in peace. A lot of people died, horrible deaths there, and people conduct little expriments with it. Let it be.
there just trying to find out if there was a way that the ship wouldn't have sank but stayed afloat keeping everyone alive and also helping today's ship have a lesser chance of sinking.
it seems money is just constantly being made out of titanic, yes we do all want to know how she sank properly, but this is just persuading people to watch their program
Well... for historians, it is important to know what happened. The expedition was not just to "create a show," -- far from it. I happened to see this show-- and it proves conclusively that the Titanic not only hit the iceberg on the side, but that a shelf under the surface ripped an entire section of the bottom hull off.
I know what you are talking about, and you make a good point. Also, you're trying to figure out what the "water stops" are called, they are called "water tight bulkheads" ...but we all know exactly how "water tight" they were... not one of the seven or eight bulkheads went to the top deck of the ship, where they would have accually been effective.
It was an interesting episode but I think people should now let it rest in peace. A lot of people died, horrible deaths there, and people conduct little expriments with it. Let it be.
omg titanic haunts me can pple stop talking about it.i have another ship to worry about, concordia but titanic haunts me more
bestfriendflower12 1 week ago
It's a terribly SIMPLE reason. It would've been "unsinkable" if they hadn't found out a new and more efficient way of making steel. It was easier to do and they thought it made it stronger, when infact it made the steel weaker; That's why the iceberg broke through it so easily.
jcodym13 2 weeks ago
titanic sank since 100years sharp how did i know : 2012-1912=100 :P
preynox41 2 weeks ago
If this says anything related to how it sank haha and I'm lady gaga
bobbyef100 2 weeks ago
THE TITANIC HIT A ICEBERG
ultimatedouche1023 4 months ago
Maybe Sponge Bob and his people grabbed the bottom and pulled... You never know. Lol
tkunkel4395 5 months ago
how did they know its titanic,maybe is olympic,cuz olympic is same with titanic
DarkMatrix217 5 months ago
This is an advertisement for the full documentary. There is no content here. Don't waste your time.
MsTruNorth 6 months ago
kraken
elasolezito 6 months ago 2
@elasolezito lol
wizardsorcerer101 6 months ago
Damn... I missed it..
IshitRainbows13 6 months ago
Stern weighs more than 1 pound too you know. Lol.
mimo7772512 6 months ago
i wish that soon there are a people get the titanic inside the sea..
because that is so important for the history...
MrBeejay28 7 months ago
Personally, I think the sinking of the Titanic was an "inside job", carried out by Elvis, Shergar and Lord Lucan, funded by the Mafia, and orchestrated by the same people who faked the moon landings.
Mind you, I am a cunt.
JoeStunner 10 months ago 13
@JoeStunner You forgot to throw in George Bush.
greenwich1754 8 months ago
@greenwich1754
Oh definitely! I know Bush organised the sinking of the Titanic because Alex Jones, David Icke and some students told me.
JoeStunner 8 months ago
@greenwich1754
Right along with George Clooney and Mel Gibson. And Cthulhu was there to try to sink the lifeboats, but Chuck Norris beat him up.
Serena2009ification 6 months ago
@JoeStunner
No, you're not! XP LOL
You, Sir, are EPIC!
Serena2009ification 6 months ago
@JoeStunner ROFL.
mermaidsh2o 1 month ago
Gee I wonder..... maybe Bob Saget did it..
NBlunierProductions 11 months ago
Must ... resist ... bad ... Yomomma-joke...
TheAudiopulse 11 months ago
Maybe Darth Vadar did it!
xXxJacksonHowardxXx 11 months ago
GOD i'm confuseddd
lollypop7088 1 year ago
I think it could've been avoided if they steered the ship to hit the ice berg head on instead of steering it to the left and making it scrape its side. If it had hit head on, maybe it could have just pushed the ship and made it stop....i believe that sounds reasonable.
xicahoney01 1 year ago
@xicahoney01 it sounds easy to dodge an iceberg, but the titanic was going at 23 knots (25m/ph or something) and thats quite fast for a very bif boat. the people in the crows nest had to use there eyesight (not binoculars, they didnt have any) and it was very dark. so the iceberg wasnt far and they spotted it. they would have dodged it if jack phillips didnt shout abuse to them (the california boat warned them) i underrstand jack though as he was in panic sending sos calls.
kekahkooproductions 1 year ago
@xicahoney01 also ismay forced the captain (using his position in the 'white star line' company) to go faster so they could get to newyork 2 days earliar. but if they ignored ismay and carried on at there own pace they would've have been 2 days late, but everyones lives would be spared. i know im giving you a history lesson (lol) but its hard to dodge and iceberg:/
kekahkooproductions 1 year ago
@kekahkooproductions Thanks!! That makes sense, there are so many theories and speculations about the Titanics' historic tragedy, also have you read a book called "The Titanic Murders"? If you're as fascinated like me about the Titanic I strongly recommend it. That's how I learned about a lot of important real characters from the Titanic. I can't recall the authors name but it's based on fiction/nonfiction. I wonder if they'll ever try to raise the Titanic in the future with more technology???
xicahoney01 1 year ago
@xicahoney01 yess yess, i agree:D at the time they wouldnt have thought of any of these theories (as you wouldnt really) andd noo im sorry i havent read the book:( do you know where you can get it???? cos recently i have been a HUGE titanic fan (even though im quite young) and app they are making a new titanic for next year in April (100th anniversary of titanic sinking) and do the same route again!! and when they past the area the titanic sink, they are doing a memorial service:D thankss :D!!!!
kekahkooproductions 1 year ago
@kekahkooproductions Hey !!! I have a question how old are u?im pretty young too...anyways the book is called the titanic murders and its by max allan collins..u can rent it at the public library thats where I got it at. and yea I heard about that too but I heard that they were going to make another movie like the titanic sequel and its gonna star leonardo di caprio (jack) and rose again!!
xicahoney01 1 year ago
@xicahoney01 im about 13:) hbu? and yess thanks, will doo:D! woop woop, i hope they do! that would bee good:D! thanks:)
kekahkooproductions 1 year ago
@kekahkooproductions lol!! im about to be 22, well hope u read that book, you'll like it ;-)
xicahoney01 1 year ago
@xicahoney01 That's exactly right. If they had just steered straight into the iceberg, they would have had some frontal damage, and a few of the compartments would have flooded, but nothing bad. They would have been able to fix it up again at Belfast. But, because they turned and the iceberg put a 300ft hole into the starboard side, there was nothing they could do.
Emmerlii 1 year ago
@Emmerlii EXACTLY!!! thank you...yea I think that if it would have hit in the front it could have had some damage, but no as much as to have sink the boat. I also heard that I the ship could have arrived safely even though it had water if only they had closed the most important doors first instead of closing them all at the same time...idk its just so sad that it could have been prevented and we could have avoided such tragedy!! :(
xicahoney01 1 year ago
It hit an iceberg
mostickers 1 year ago
why can't they admit that i was chuck norris with a roundhouse kick?
withmycap 1 year ago
TITANIC sank in the ATLANTIC OCEAN RIGHT!!!
ATLANTIS was in the ATLANTIC OCEAN!!!
probably TITANIC got attacked by ATLANTEANS!!!!!
2822522 1 year ago 13
@2822522 awsome that is 1 awsome comment lolz
2centuryfox 5 months ago
Comment removed
2822522 1 year ago
Send me a message to see y the titanic sank not a iceberg
jm36091 1 year ago
My way: Some guy on board got bored out of hell, went to the bottom of the ship and chopped a hole with a axe.
TheNoobKing86 1 year ago
I think she broke apart because!
The back was sticking up in the air, means its pretty fucking heavy. Add the people who were there to avoid the water. Adds a few thousand lbs.
sufkiller 1 year ago
Any1 have any ideas on where i can find the whole documentary??
aaronman6188 1 year ago
Looks like a Conspiracy Theorists' night in..
gabrielthomas84 1 year ago
Only if they had more time & enough life boats. ];
JoeCentraI 1 year ago
Comment removed
Tailobol 1 year ago
@Tailobol dude did you listen to me?first of all its IMPOSSIBLE for a 30.000 ton back to get in 30 degree against gravity itself and you must even thing about the 1500 people that where on here back at that time she probably could not hold it at more than max 15-25 degree cause i mean it 30.000 ton + 1500 people(=60 to 80 kg for every people on board at that time =90 to 120 ton in total,so that kinda A LOT! and thing about what they wearing at that time cause that could get to a nice extra 2ton)
longer393 1 year ago
@longer393 a ship like that can sink in 30 degree angle becouse,
a giant tanker that is bigger and heavier than titanic can :P
Tailobol 1 year ago
@Tailobol your an idiot! you can't try to prove anything with that!cause titanic was still a ship made in 1910 most was with machine but still some with hand and what your talking about is about a ship thats like made in 2000!we now have better ships that can take more than the ship's in 1910 could!titanic was outside of steel but inside of wood so that breaks easy,but the ships today are almost from top to bottom made out of steel and im a 100% sure a tanker is made 100% out of steel.
longer393 1 year ago
thats scary
noracool10 1 year ago
titanic sink because of the same reason the challenger blew up .
nagamora 1 year ago
Okay, the Titanic did not break in half the same way as in the movie. Th engine weighed many tons and therefore Titanic would have broken at a shallower angle. Instead of over 30 degrees as in the movie, the ship would have broken at about 11 degrees. There is no way the ship would have been able to get so high of an angle with so heave of an engine.
sinkingship5 1 year ago
@sinkingship5 first in the movie the ship was only at an angle of 6 degree but they ditagly add more so it was not 6 not 30 but 45 degrees and that indeed is impsossible cause the back 30.000 ton so i think he cracked at an 15-25 degree that could look for the survivors like it was realy high and made them possible thing 30-40 dergree
longer393 1 year ago
If Titanic hadn't of broken then she would have stayed afloat in a idle position long enough for all the people to be saved by Carpathia. But the breaking caused to sink extremely fast.
Titanicluver321 1 year ago
@Titanicluver321 No it would not! The ship was being dragged down into the ocean by it's bow. If the ship never broke in half the ship would have been dragged down be the bow the whole way down, migh even been fully vertical at one point. It would have been pulled on an angle until it was fully in the ocean, then it probibly would have leveled out and came to a crash at the bottom on the ocean.
HQFitz 1 year ago
@HQFitz dude chill. and i really doubt that...
Titanicluver321 1 year ago
@sinkingship5 you don't have to be an expert at titanic to know what you have written in your comment it's pritty basic.
clctitanic 1 year ago
Okay first of all I am an expert on the Titanic. Alot of people suffered and died in this tragic disaster so lets be serious and not making jokes about it like Megamanfan111 is. Okay Titanic hit an iceberg, and then she sank from the bow. However, it is still not completely sure how or when it broke up and thats what everyone is trying to figure out.
sinkingship5 1 year ago
@sinkingship5 Well duh alot of people died. i know everything there is to know about the R.M.S. Titanic. Of course she broke right between the third and fourth funnel. Because Titanic had a gap in her hull structure so that she could move with the waves that weakened the ship when it came to sinking. The gap couldnt hold the approximet weight of the Titanic which was 48,000 tons. So of course she broke. so she broke the same was as in the movie Titanic in 1997.
Titanicluver321 1 year ago
=Chaterton and ol Richie had bad weather sunk all their money in this expedition,got a dive or two in ,less than planned on. to sell the show on this already as said known part they made this already known great find,these two are the biggest blow hard nobody's in diving history and worshiped as gods to the few that follow their every foots step
go to the keys and teach rebreather tecs to fools that will pay you way too much for the star factor!
dive7mmwet 2 years ago
guys its easy!!! if u really wanna see how the titanic really sank, just borrow doc browns time machine and go back to 1912! but then again if u do that u might as well just save the titanc from sinking and change the course of history and cause a major time.....whatever he calls it in the back to the future movies lol
dingo931 2 years ago
Hi I think doc brown called it a time flux continuim
WeskersDaughter 2 years ago
the stress on the hull from water made it split.
An iceberg hit it!not a torpedoe u dumb shits.(not everybody)
251rocker 2 years ago
we all know this because the level of the water was to weak to carry it all down in 1 go because it wasnt an equalparts it just had to split
ionaford1978 2 years ago 2
Yes but how many were really aboard the titianic 2228.
krissypoetnwriter 2 years ago
i mean world war1 it sank in 1912 so could or not be true about the germens sinking it
mrjamesbomb1 2 years ago
@mrjamesbomb1 ... if you could fail any more as a troll i would be very suprised world war one was 1914 to 1918 so please go eat some glass
LordAKiraAndou 2 years ago
@lordAKiraAndou ffs he was only saying what he thought big deal he was wrong get a fuking grip a urself and stop insulting people for no reason atall... prick
alanmcivor 1 year ago
your history fail? even a toddler would noe that ww1 was 1914 2 years after the titanic sunk u moron
hotdevilsz 2 years ago 2
ive scene it but the was no record that it hit an iceberk is the it could be the germena it was in world war2
mrjamesbomb1 2 years ago
mrjamesbomb1, WWII was started in 1939 and ended by 1946 in the pacific. Titanic sank in 1912 and there was numerous reports that Titanic hit an ice berg. Germans didnt sink her. They had no need to. The Lusitania & Mauritania was built to steal the blue ribband from the germans. Not Olympic/Titanic.
Milner62 2 years ago
@mrjamesbomb1 How the hell could the germans possibly have sunk it? If a german torpedo hit it, we would have known that when sonar scans were sent down there. There are images of the tear in her side that prove it was an iceberg. I have no idea what so ever where you got the idea that germans did that.
naxa321 2 years ago
man.... if ur gonna comment on a titanic sinking at least b sure to get the facts rite ww1 started 2 years after the titanic sank (1914) u must b getting confused with the lusitania
07Blackhawk 1 year ago 2
is there a website for the whole video? like the history channel?
thanks, masterdawg2008
masterdawg2008 2 years ago
@masterdawg2008 It's on youtube. Just search "Hist Ch Titanic's Final Moments 2006 01 de 10"
Robin21lorden 2 years ago
btw i know its real im not tryin to say its fake but imagine that lol
BlizzCandy 2 years ago
imagine if this was just all made up...
like they probably were like .. hmmm we really need to go down in history for something lets make up this.
BlizzCandy 2 years ago
is there anywhere i can see this whole thing?
ZachLivingway1 2 years ago
this show was good
113dsc 2 years ago 3
I remember watching that the night it aired. Good special. Worth watching! They discussed the buckling of the underside..
ragemanchoo82 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there isn't new evidence piece of shit
parasol222 2 years ago
Parasol, nope this isnt new evidence. The double bottom was known to exsist where they found it in this video back in the mid 1990`s when they did a sonar scan of the wreck area. No one just investigated it. In the end I havent watched the video but I know they are putting forth their bottom up break. In the end I put zero faith in this new theory. This bottom piece could have got pulled off the ship after she broke her back and sank beneath the waves and ended up where it is today.
Milner62 2 years ago
lol, conspiracy theorists
Dauntless07 2 years ago 3
yeah well they suck
Tomasch 2 years ago 3
conspiracy where? -.-
CarlosBcn1989 2 years ago
United states thought it had evil terrorists on it heading to new york city so they shot it down and sank it!
TOPGUNCANADA00 2 years ago
no youre wrong...they were aliens that took all the dead for expirements (LOL)
AFTRoL 2 years ago
nice lol
TOPGUNCANADA00 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
no the titanic was shot by a time travelling nazi submarine...
evidence on w w w . faggotclickhere . c o m
SmrtJugoslaviji 2 years ago
Your site doesn't esixt!11!1!!!!
Liar!!!
XD =P
Doum92 2 years ago
haha ;)
Spandrel2009 2 years ago
i go whit the MEGALADON theory that 1 make sense
DukeNukem500 2 years ago 2
what if a MEGALADON bit the titanic thats probbaly how it sank
Megamanfan111 2 years ago 30
WHOA :O
That would be crazy..
missmacabre0013 2 years ago
@Megamanfan111 NOOOOOOOOO it was godzillas spines that got missplaced by icebergs :P
Dinobot2468 1 year ago
@Megamanfan111
noo i believe its godzilla's spikes that may look like an iceberg was the fault
kevin080592 1 year ago
@Megamanfan111 in waters THAT cold? wouldn't chance it
Eskimop16 11 months ago
@Megamanfan111 thats funny because i typed in on google "can a megalodon sink the titanic" and i didnt find anything so i typed in titanic of youtube and this vid poped up and i saw your comment :P. btw i got a good megalodon fact video on my youtube channel.
MrRandomusername01 9 months ago
@Megamanfan111 lol it,s not a megaladon but a megalodon ;P
GaMeR4eVeR14 6 months ago
my friends grandpa was one of the first people that found the titanic!
stawaz 2 years ago
and the titanic was not built well, it only had one lair of steel, the strongest part was the front, though, so if it hit there, it would've sank slower... i found that out at the titanic museaum- newfounland
stawaz 2 years ago
cool!
SizzleMike32 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nobody give a shit
MIKRO2323 2 years ago
about you loser
stawaz 2 years ago 2
ATTENTION EVERYONE: Should we turn ACRE1971 into the FBI for his fucked up comment? That sounds like a threat to me???
AZtwoNE 2 years ago
Comment removed
themargenaus 2 years ago
it got bit in two by a godzillasaurus that was sleeping in cryogenic suspension and released from the ice berg by the titanic. New evidence, I am not wearing any pants....film at eleven!
abacab987 2 years ago
There's no mystery as to why the Titanic broke in two. The weight from the bow pulled the ship down and the the ship was too long and fragile to stay in one piece.
CiaranMcVeigh 2 years ago
Boeing 707 PP-VLU will be found as the same manner as Titanic.
ACRE1971 2 years ago
Do you mean to say you think the aircraft is as big as the Titanic ship or are you making some sort of threat? You Got AZtwoNE all upset...
themargenaus 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there is a myth that the real titanic never sank that it was switched.
thetoon99 2 years ago
ur gay
GThazard 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the captain of the ship was such a retard. he didnt see an iceberg the size of a hill! becoz of his stupid eyes 1000's of ppl died
talzO8 2 years ago
That's not true. There was no waves that could've done the ice berg easier to see, and it was pretty dark.
DopingBox 2 years ago 5
Excuse for my English.
The captain is not guilty. The vessel went not in full operation.
And very much has not carried - the iceberg was very dark (It is a kind of black icebergs which turn over also an edge does not stiffen инием), no in sky the moon and waves (Would be waves - round an iceberg would be a lamb).
1502 persons roughly were lost.
siplusplus 2 years ago 14
Also, the design of the ship was flawed in that the "water stops" didnt go all the way to cieling so water flowed over and over each. It would NOT have sunk if the water stops went to cieling... as well as many other combination of things contributed to this disaster. But that is WHY it actually sunk... The REASON for taking on water was the iceberg. The FAULT was the captains (sorry, but true)for refusing to slow down when they warned of icebergs.
themargenaus 2 years ago
Preventions of icebergs were feature, them вегда was much. The captain has not dispersed a steamship, 2 coppers did not work. It was a proskating rink of engines. Besides, the course was still to the south and longer usual. It was made by the captain to provide safety.
I do not see its fault, I see fault of circumstances - no the moon, waves (a lamb from iceberg it is not visible) and imperfect laws of a radio communication and equipment by boats of steamships in that century.
siplusplus 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
first of all, there not "water stops." obveously, you no nothing about ship building. secondly, the disaster was because of the ship being too big and she had too small of a rudder
smilley28 2 years ago
Well, as long as were being RUDE... Obviously YOU KNOW NOTHING about the Titanic... the Titanic DID in fact have soemthing like water stops. I dont know if they called them "water stops" or not, but the Titanic, for a fact, had them. So, like the word or not, the Titanic had them... and if they were buit to the cieling the Titanic wold not have completely sunk. Thats a fact. So Fuck off! :) lol
themargenaus 2 years ago 3
yes this is true they werent sealed off they were like an ice tray in the freezer by filling one square it over flows filling the others and thats wat made it sink.
wrinn2332 2 years ago
In addition... There were MANY, many factors involved that contributed to the Titanic not just one detail as you stated. Just the fact that Titanic had a small rudder isnt the REASOn for the disaster... as was my whole point on my original statement. Oh... and my explaination on the waterstops arent MY IDEAS, they are the opinions of scientists that studied the tragedy, I didnt make it up.
themargenaus 2 years ago
yes thats what made it sink.. or could have been that giant ice burge nahhhhh it was the rudder.
wrinn2332 2 years ago
sound like u were their. Another THEROY?
stevo07cfc1888 2 years ago
and foggy
stawaz 2 years ago
Wow you're a complete retard. The captain wasn't even on deck when the iceberg was spotted (about 1.30 am)! Plus the lookout\s binoculars had gone missing that particular night.
Danny77uk 2 years ago
well not 1:30 am, 11:40 pm, but still, he wasn't on deck.
mariopatrick123 2 years ago
Wow, you're ignorant.
LightStijn 2 years ago
Actually in the field-glass look as soon as have seen a subject.
And an iceberg have identified at once. But the captain on the bridge небыло. It is not guilty.
Once again I am sorry for the English
siplusplus 2 years ago
What exactly are you trying to say?
LightStijn 2 years ago
no the cpatain of the ship was asleep and even if he was there he still wouldn't have been held responsible. The crows nest binoculars went missing and therefore the equipment on the crows nest was inadiquate to see the iceberg until it was too late. Also there was no water breaking at the ice burg, so it was like seeing a smaller vessel with no lights and painted black. Sort of like a ghost iceburg.
Spudfish93 2 years ago 3
Smith does everything he can to make much people survive, and you say this! There were 2 lookouts and they see the iceberg too late, the ship was turning when she hits the iceberg!
paardenneo 2 years ago
i used to be a fan on titanic now im a bioshock fan
MPandaSauce 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. put ur middle finger on ur nose
2. say the name of sum 1 u like
3. that person will ask u out or say they luv u tomorrow
4. now copy and paste to 2 other vids.
gowolx 2 years ago
the whole titanic was a beauty!whenever i watch this i feel some kind of pain in my heart!!its a beautiful model!!and i feel really sad such a beauty broke and so many peole died!
sexygirl123451234588 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ill tell you how it sank. "OH SHIT WE HIT A ROCK WE ARE FUCKED"
SomPeopleLikeToSmash 2 years ago
retard it was an Iceberg :s
edderd8 2 years ago 5
gee... i wonder what would of happened if the titanic DIDNT sink...
ImmortalKing11 2 years ago
It would probably just have gone on to get scrapped during the war... a bigger ship would have been built in the meantime and Titanic's fame would just die quite quickly.
OspreyInTheSky 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. put ur middle finger on ur nose
2. say the name of sum 1 u like
3. that person will ask u out or say they luv u tomorrow
4. now copy and paste to 2 other vids.
luvinthislive 2 years ago
shame about Jack though , and that rose ! what a tart!! :-)
paulspydar 2 years ago
lol
cykadelik 2 years ago
HAHA! that made me laugh really loudly!
Paulionirichardsoni 2 years ago
Comment removed
paulspydar 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
glad to hear it,,,,, :-)
paulspydar 2 years ago
Thats easy the stern had air trapped in it
so as it went down the air blew up and the bowl
was full and shaped like a arrow head first to the bottom that took 7 min to hit the bottom so the stern took 10 min and half a km away
QDTREEN 2 years ago
wierd
mikey123456789boy 2 years ago
I like the Titanic.
I hate silly sensationalist presentations on the subject. I also really, really dislike it when people like Dirtboy101 resort to histrionics and racism to try and make the Titanic sound more important than it was, when it was already a pretty significant event with regards to shipping regulations and society in general...
BarryDennen12 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I got news for you, Richie - it hit a big fucking bit of ice, started sucking up water, and BOOM. BYE BYE. FUCKIN' END OF STORY. Go play Warhammer or something...
BarryDennen12 2 years ago
Comment removed
Dirtboy101 2 years ago
NO. Forced female circumcision is immoral and unethical. Runaway spending on 'defense' is immoral and unethical. There are a million and one things worse than my comment.
You racist prat. I dare say 'France' has had a bigger, more necessary role in history than your entire family...
BarryDennen12 2 years ago
what does unethical mean?
lolzpstaker 2 years ago
'Unethical' is what islam and moslems do to themselves and us kuffar, the non moslems. You see, they'll slice your head off just because you don't believe in their cocksucker, allah, or their pedophile prophet, mohammad, the pig shit of eternity. THAT is unethical.
moslemssuck 2 years ago
and this has anything to do with what?
cykadelik 2 years ago
no it was over 1500
fireboy70000 2 years ago
actually its 1800
umamakesh24 2 years ago
1,500 to be exact.
hiddentube 2 years ago
well there is no exact number due to several errors but the most widely believed figure is 1,517 dead.
Dirtboy101 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1. copy and paste
2. send this to 2 other videos.
3. hold your breath for 10 seconds
4. press refresh twice
3. LOOK AT YOUR BACKGROUND
f3nrir6 2 years ago
the engine blown up and that why it sank
Lush246 2 years ago
and the new evidence is?
winnerbaby44 2 years ago
thats so cringe.
viabetty1912 2 years ago
It was an interesting episode but I think people should now let it rest in peace. A lot of people died, horrible deaths there, and people conduct little expriments with it. Let it be.
akosiviance 2 years ago
it isnt desrespectiful to find out how it sank
1999UTD 2 years ago 3
there just trying to find out if there was a way that the ship wouldn't have sank but stayed afloat keeping everyone alive and also helping today's ship have a lesser chance of sinking.
but I do see where you are coming from.
Puukieochan 2 years ago
it seems money is just constantly being made out of titanic, yes we do all want to know how she sank properly, but this is just persuading people to watch their program
viabetty1912 2 years ago
Well... for historians, it is important to know what happened. The expedition was not just to "create a show," -- far from it. I happened to see this show-- and it proves conclusively that the Titanic not only hit the iceberg on the side, but that a shelf under the surface ripped an entire section of the bottom hull off.
therealmarige 2 years ago
Could you describe some of the "horrible deaths" aboard the Titanic? Rude or not my question may be, I am interested in the answer.
ALex4815162342 2 years ago
Sorry if I affected anyone from the comment below. It wasn't mean to be THAT bad.
The world is chaos now.
Bad economy, overpopulation, worse air quality, global warming, more disasters, and running out of foods and water.
It seems we don't care.
Humans will become extinct easily if we do happen to be that way. Thousands (or billions) of species died because of us.
I know Titanic sinking was sad.
But in reality, move on into our lives.
And this isn't to affect anyone. I love Titanic too.
Luckypet4747 3 years ago
How could you get a thumbs down?? i gave you a thumbs up for this comment :)
themargenaus 2 years ago 14
I know what you are talking about, and you make a good point. Also, you're trying to figure out what the "water stops" are called, they are called "water tight bulkheads" ...but we all know exactly how "water tight" they were... not one of the seven or eight bulkheads went to the top deck of the ship, where they would have accually been effective.
AZtwoNE 2 years ago 2
It was an interesting episode but I think people should now let it rest in peace. A lot of people died, horrible deaths there, and people conduct little expriments with it. Let it be.
HarleyQuinn1276 3 years ago 2