Added: 4 years ago
From: ogniank
Views: 169,075
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (457)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This sounds like a possible explanation of ghost interactions or hauntings where unexplained occurrences of moving objects exist. Another being from a different Universe trying to communicate via a shared gravitational force between branes? Hmm..

  • @GrayHatH4x0r ive often thought myself.

  • Comment removed

  • @GrayHatH4x0r I dont want to live on this planet anymore.

  • @GrayHatH4x0r Oh, c'mon, man! That's ridiculous!  Use your branes! :P

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • but gravity pulls billions of tons, you magnet only some grams.

  • i love this shit

  • does m-theory change if they put the particle faster than light??

  • @dunckify Didn't it show the Tachyon?

  • @dunckify the strings between particles have often been described as being necessary to be faster than c, so no it wouldn't change, it would actually be more proof for it

  • So that's what earthquakes are, other dimensions are just trying to communicate with us. Oh it all seems so simple now. Sorry Japan, a slice of bread was just saying hi.

  • why is there porno music in the background D:

  • @Jrkoop53 you seem to be very familiar with porno music

  • This is probably a stupid question :P how can we be neighbours with other universes when our universe are expanding? are we just expanding forward or something?

  • maybe we are getting to caught up in the theorys of gravity... perhaps it has much to do with the mind set after all thought is what creates vibration and whos to say what came first thought?? or light and sound and our imprinting of the whole manifested to what it is today... its all about survival skills of each dimension

  • ok I was following everything up till this point - i think im gonna call it a day here and go to bed!! bloody dimension talk!

  • these guys are mad yo

  • I promised won't eat bread anymore.

  • Bind = blown. To another universe. 

  • @PLAYERUNO321 Excuse me, *His

  • there is something i dont get. 1. gravity is due to mass. and mass is the string with their end tied down on our brane. 2. gravitons are responsible for gravity and not tied down to our brane. 3. gravity is basically the curvature of space .could u guys please tell me how to unify them three?

  • Note to self: Stop reading comments on YouTube physics videos.

  • @MikeRoePhonicsMusic Nah some comments on these vids are lovely.

  • @MikeRoePhonicsMusic reading your comment on not to read comments holds a paradox.

  • @MikeRoePhonicsMusic It's unfortunate that I don't read the comments on YouTube physics videos. Otherwise, I'd know how hilarious the comments on this one are.

  • so would or could this explain how dark matter or dark energy could possibly be a brain that dose not allow gravitons to escape at the same rate or at all from the brain, still that begs the question why are some of them different sizes and would those brains cluster together & interact or mealy pass through each other like rippling waves?

  • How does a mass replenish it's messenger strings? Unless all messenger strings are reflected back to the source, wouldn't a mass "run out" of, say, gravitrons?

  • Omg first they call us strings now we're jelly. Next they'll say all matter resembles balloon animals haha

  • yeah, pool tables and toasts! that's how you teach physics!

  • It can't just wonder off! All the energomass in the universe is sustainable, nothing can wonder off from this universe.

  • 6:00 - Mind = blown.

  • why can't gravity be electro magnetism! everything that is organic in this dimension is made of carbon.there fore like attracts like. being able to pick up an apple versus something inorganic like water or iron will effect the electromagnetism? actually your not feeling the mass of an object but the electromagnetism to the object.if someone was to pick up the tee it wouldn't be that mass that would makeit difficult to pick up but the EM of the tree pulling the person towards it. just a guess!

  • why none if the apples fall on his face @ 00:42 

  • Dang physics makes me hungry

  • @Hobbzie22 Just as Einstein stated that he does not like atheists quoting him, for the same reason I do not like that when churches quote Einstein. The "God" Einstein described was in fact, nature, and by saying he is religious he meant that he loves nature as much as studying it. "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings."

  • Einstein was an Atheist but in a different sense. He depicted God as the universe, its laws and binds us as one. He was a Pantheist a kind of sex-up Atheism. Pantheist are often to be Physicist like Michio Kaku. Einstein rejected the concept of any personal God but not a life force "I think" or what we call a deist might believe.

  • Thumbs up for playing pool while listening to porn music!

  • I'm hungry

  • OMG already. Gravity only seems "weak" to us because we evolved to work within the level of gravity on this planet. I am going to shoot myself if i hear another metaphore in education. People usually understand theories until some dick head tries to come up with a metaphor and makes it worse 95% of the time.

  • @danthecurious and i suppose the electromagnetic force also evolved to be stronger than gravity? not to say that i do not believe that we have evolved to cope with gravity but i do say that you are missing the point

  • @danthecurious

    You are stupid as hell, and this is a stupid person calling you that.

  • @danthecurious u sir, do not get physics in any way shape or form. Gravity is weak on other particles as well not just humans. When he says it seem weak, he is not talking about humans seeing it as weak, he is talking about it being relatively weak.

  • @Hobbzie22 I'll admit I have a lot to learn.

  • What do you want me to do, provide you with links?

    Sounds like you're a Xian that doersn't want to deal with the truth. That's ok, I used to be one too.

  • Black Holes FTW =P

  • this video is a mormon's wors nightmare =)

  • 0:30 hahahaha Newton is a parrot who can't decide which side of the geeks shoulder he should sit on

  • 3:44 Porno physics

  • @trujames2693 yet another fucking retarded youtube comment. go surf your fucking porno on the internet and quit leaving stupid comments like this on videos related to science. go jerk off to your porn somewhere else idiot. 

  • dudes, now they're talking about communication with other universes, when we haven't even communicated with anything within our galaxy. take it easy!

  • i had a deam about the m theory

  • *gravity isn't a powerful force

  • truth is they have really no idea but just ways of making their formula work, or at least that what it seems like. Add a theory here and another dimension there, consolidate, validate then eradicate. Then ejaculate and if your lucky inside of a woman and not a tissue which leaves a truly sticky membrane for gravity to work with.

  • magnets freak me out.

  • black holes rosen-bridge theory anyone? white hole cant exist because it violates the laws of thermodynamics, but on a different brane, would those laws exist? plus what could have a stronger gravitational force than a black hole?

  • Dont blame gravity for it being too hard to get up in the morning, old man. Blame the baconator

  • I enjoy reading the quasi-intellectual responses completely oblivious to the basic mistakes committed by professor Greene in this video, a basic examination of the metric tensor indicates that it's impossible to remove matter in space, so according to general relativity the illustrations are folly.

    Then again, this video is nothing but indoctrination intended for the masses whom will never deduce the theory themselves, akin to religion really.

  • This rarely gets said in string theory vids, so I'll go ahead and say it. If the 10+1 dimensions of string theory exist, then gravity, at small scales, would fall off as the inverse 9th power of distance. It would lose most of its apparent force in a fraction of a millimeter. And then would appear to us as a much weaker force which falls off as the inverse square of the distance. (It's kind of like with dipoles.) It took me a while to grasp that. So I figured I'd mention this explicitly.

  • Universe is made of string. With string, combine to make yarn. With yarn, knit a sweater. Now tear the sweater and you have torn gravity! Enjoy infinite flight!

    You jelly Newton?

  • uhg, we got it after sound wave...jelly...really?

  • If Jesus was real, his face would be on all of those pieces of bread!!!

  • @xcellken1 - Jesus scientifically did exist dumb ass....

  • @blitzac2005 I must've missed that day in science class...dumb ass

  • @xcellken1 - yes you did, look it up on wikipedia...

    haha jp.

    it's everywhere dude honestlyt hough.

  • @blitzac2005 Actually, last year, I googled "Jesus was a myth". Quite an eye opener. Turns out that outside of the Bible, there is NO credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth ever existed!!! Plus you must consider all of the contradictory stories in the New Testament, plus all of the Jesus stories that are identical to earlier god figures, you're left with an empty cloth. Of course, if I missed somethingh, please feel free to illuminate me.

  • @xcellken1 Look up the Dead Sea Scrolls. Documents of His existence, besides the Bible.

  • @xcellken1 you realize that if you only listen to what they teach you in science class, you are the dumb one.

  • @xcellken1 Also, God and His infinite existence is proved through science.

    The Law of Conservation of Energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only change forms.

    The universe runs on energy.

    Where did the energy come from?

    God.

  • @PLAYERUNO321 ask Stephen Hawking

    

  • @PLAYERUNO321 Well, because he wrote a book called "The Grand Design," supposedly explaining how the Universe could have appeared from nothing. But I don't claim to know how it works.

  • @basicallyimfamous That is no doubt interesting, and i would love to read it, however my belief is unchanging.

  • @blitzac2005 Now I remember...MY high school science teacher was Greek. He taught me that Zeus and Apollo were scientifically proven. That's why I didn't know about Jesus. But then I went to college, and my Scandenavian science teacher scientifically proved that Thor was real. Gawd, now I'm soooooo confused!!!

  • @xcellken1 - I didn't say that God was scientifically proven, I said the man made Jesus was. Whatever you beleive after that is up to you.

  • @blitzac2005 Actually, not only is there no credible evidence that Jesus of Nazareth ever existed, there is no credible evidence that the town of Nazareth existed at the time that Jersus was alledged to have lived.

  • @xcellken1 - Yeah not too much of a Youtube debater....i'll just let you be right. good job.

  • @blitzac2005 Logic dictates that when you make a claim, it is incumbent upon you to prove your claim. I don't have to disprove it. You alledge that a guy named Jesus of Nazareth existed, yet you did NOTHING to prove it. Epic fail on your part.

    How's that for debating prowess???

  • @xcellken1 so then how did the first mutiverse start?

  • @Hobbzie22 I have absolutely no idea, and truth be told, neither do you, althought I'm fairly certain that you will go to the default position that "God" created it. And how ironic is it that the vast majority that go to the default position that "God" did it somehow also believe that the "Christian" god did it!

  • @xcellken1 I didn't say a Christian God did it (although I believe is was and am now saying it) but the fact remains that scientifically as of now today a Deity HAD to have created the first mutliverse. I would explain entirely if youtube gave me enough room. Basically a universe begetting a universe as Hawking theorized can only happed if a universe in not static. However for a universe to have been there forever as was the first universe, it would have had to have been static.

  • @Hobbzie22 Your idea is NOT scientific, its theocratic. BTW, who created the first Diety??? Explain that.

    If 500 words isn't enuf to splain your "scientific" theory, perhaps you should make a video and do so???

  • @xcellken1 I don't know why you are getting so flustered. If you don't regard theory as science then why are you watching this? General Relativity is just a theory, but it is regarded as one of the most important theories of the 20th and even 21st centuries. The point is that nothing in know physics can possibly have ALWAYS been there. Therefore something not obeying general laws of physics (that includes the special physics of specific branes) cannot exist but we know that it does.

  • @Hobbzie22 I'm hardly flustered. In fact, I'm in awe. I'm in the presence of someone that has domw something that has elduded the great minds thoughout history, ie, used, science th prove that the Christian God exists!!! You nobel prize should be arriving in the mail any day now!!!

  • @xcellken1 Okay well if you aren't flustered you are certainly arrogant and hostile. I am trying to have an honest conversation as I'm sure the other guy who was talking to you was. And its not my idea btw it was Einstein and Newton's (I know Einstein was Jewish but he still used the same facts to state God exists) I believe in a Christian God because there is more historical data from the time period about Jesus than any other human being EVER before the era of the internet.

  • @Hobbzie22 Wow, Newton believed in God. That was 400 years ago, when God dominated ALL aspects of life. Atheism hadn't been invented yet. Also, einstein was an atheist. Look it up. Those who say he wasn't are using revisionist history. As to your last contention, you've GOT TO BE KIDDING ME!!! There is aboslutely NO HOSTORICAL EVIDENCE that a person nmaed Jesus of Nazareth EVER EXISTED!!! Google Jesus Was A Myth.

  • @xcellken1 Ive probably said this to you before, but Google the Dead Sea Scrolls.

  • @Hobbzie22 Sorry about the arrogance and hostility. If you are serious about what you contend, then I feel sorry for you. Otherwise, you have all the makings of a troll, which brings out the hostility in my gentle soul!

  • @Hobbzie22 Dude, I apologize. I just checked out your profile, and you're only 16 years old. That would explain much. Please don't take this the wrong way, but you have MUCH to learn about science, and life. BTW< I'm jealous of you cause you live in Canada, where everyone has affordable health care.

  • @xcellken1 what exactly is your job that you are able to tell someone else how much they know about science? And do you feel sorry for all the other scientists who know that currently a Deity is the only explanation at the moment? Even Hawking agrees with that. (he just believes that someone will come along with a breakthrough) and Idk where you are getting your fact because Einstein did believe in God. He was NOT an atheist.

  • @Hobbzie22 Einstein do not believe in the "God" churches worshiped. He even ditched the bible in one of his letters. The "God" he worshiped is the "Spinoza's God, who reveals himself in the lawful harmony of the world, not in a god who concerns himself with the fate and the doings of mankind"-quoted from wiki, where by worshiping I meant studying, experimenting, and understanding and proving it, not blindly reading some ancient book telling us not to detest whatever that was wrote.

  • @alan133 but he was not and Atheist, he detested Athiests. Read a little more history, he did believe that God created mankind through the creation of the universe.

  • @Hobbzie22 All I know is that he was raised in the "Christianity" way. He have a great respect for Jesus as well as the church, but wait. "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings." “The word god is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honourable, but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish,”

  • @alan133 Don't worry. I am not debating whether Einstein was an atheist or not. He clearly isn't, as well as I. I do not have the same respect towards churches tho, and that is just my opinion.

  • @xcellken1 Also your "Jesus Myth" theory is just as speculative as Christianity. There are over 50000 different books and documents that have been carbon dated to within 50 years of the date listed in the Bible. (I know the date is approx 4 years off) if it was fiction then how come so many people wrote about it. They have also found 3 bodies marked as Apostles that are all dated properly. "Jesus Myth" is all speculation and veiws on the Bible, just like every other religion.

  • @Hobbzie22 50,000 books? Three dead Apostles? Do you know that over 90% of Evolutionary Scientists are Atheists? Sources???

  • @xcellken1 Unless God, and the Christian God are the same, which they are.

  • @PLAYERUNO321 hey!!!!!!!!!! is blasphemy what your church teaches you ??

  • @IvanderHaisley What?

  • @blitzac2005 Wow, I'm such a nice guy, I changed my mind. Here ya go, google this:

    atheists.org TheMythofNazareth DoesitReallyMatter

  • @xcellken1 - I said you're right, good job.

  • @blitzac2005 Thank you. May you have a nice day.

  • @xcellken1 how do you know he didnt make the bread? ;)

  • @boazandjiacinth I would have no way of knowing that...and neither do you.

  • @xcellken1 0:05 take a look @ jesus :D

  • @1998anirudh That's NOT Jesus, its just some geeky scientist.

  • @xcellken1 HOW DO U KNOW LOL ?

  • @1998anirudh Cuase its a video about geeky scientists??? LOL

  • @xcellken1 Loled

  • @1998anirudh Glad I could brighten your day!!!

  • @xcellken1 maybe he's face wasof one of those pieces of bread, unless you were expecting to see the old regular human face :)

  • @TheGazelle85 I was expecting to see the old regular human face, the one that always appears on other pieces of bread!!!

  • @xcellken1 It would be on the bullk

  • @xcellken1 NEW THEORY: Jesus' face wouldn't necessarily be on that bread...because his face only appears on TOAST, and that loaf of bread hasn't been toasted. So even tho Jesus isn't on that loaf of bread, it doesn't disprove his existence. Kirk Cameron would be so proud of me!!!

  • @xcellken1 I agree. Jesus is Toast!

  • @Huttate1 The Theist would disagree with you. he would state that Jesus is NOT toast...he is a communion wafer!

  • who created Gravity? Time, Motion, Mass, Black Holes, if the universe created itself from gravity in black holes, God did not create the universe, Gravity did, but who created Gravity? lol. Big Bang and beginning of Time? Time is not infinte? Time is finite? Black hole has gravity or no gravity? black hole is dark matter or nothing? no Time in a black hole?

  • that pool joke was TOO funny...

  • Universes are bread, particles are jam, gravity is cinnamon and sugar, and people doubted the string theory

  • Jason quietly sits in the kitchen. "GREETINGS..." says the loaf of breed, "...WE ARE YOUR NEIGHBOURS. FROM EARTH. TAKE US TO YOUR LEADER.".

  • If gravity comes and goes from/to our 3 dimensions then we should be able to observe spontaneous gravitational fluctuations with no apparent reasons.

    I believe we can measure that.

    I would suggest to build a sphere of gravitational sensors and put one sensor at the centre of it. If the reading from that sensor fluctuates without change in the readings from the other sensors it would mean gravity is coming from somewhere else.

    I believe we already can measure gravitational waves?

  • @gespilk There is LISA,LIGO and others that is 2 or 3 tubes with laser and with the same size , in a 90º angle. That if the laser reach the center in different times each other, then is detected a gravitational wave. And with the triangulation we can know from where it comes. But we haven't yet detected nothing uncommon, and if detect, may be a colapsing star, or black holes, quasars etc. Is hard to implement your idea,

  • @gespilk most peculiar 

  • This 'Other Dimension' or "Parallel Universe' may potentially explain the existence of heaven or the disembodied spirits. It is just that, we cannot possibly perceive those things in the dimensions we live in.

  • @Getsurenka25 agreed

  • 0:41 why do i know that that music is from Spyro 2... man i play too much vidya

  • Free energy can change the world!But Elite controllers don't want ppl to be free from the costs of energy,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be part of the revolution!

  • What are strings made of?

  • @zukodude487987 depends on which way they vibrate

  • @focuswarrior Lets say they vibrate in a certain direction (what ever fits for you).

    What would they be made of then and what would they be if it were vibrating in any other direction?

  • @zukodude487987 well, direction would only be applied in our 3 dimentional known realm

    i think you are more in question of the strings

    strings are basically vibrations/frequency...like sound, in a way...depending on what vibration...what sound they produce....the motion, that is actually activated produces matter.

    that is my personal interpretation on the strings themselves

  • why not say it's more like a cell instead of bread? Permiable membrane...only certain particles can leave or enter some requiring others to help like transport protiens....gravity working kinda like hydrostolic pressure...

  • enough with all the bullshiting. Show me the freaking math. jelly and crap...

    Where are the equations? Its like listening to a bedtime story

  • @h0wud0in2 agreed, its like they think that the majority of the people watchng this are 6 year olds.

  • Has anyone ever thought that Because of Millions of years of evolution, we grew acustomed to the gravity on earth? Our ancestors billions of years ago couldn't stand, and now we can. So isnt that how we cannot feel it, because we are accustomed to it?

  • all this bread an science is making me hungry

  • okey... intelligent life in other universemembranes in other dimentions that they want to talk to? isn't it hard enough to talk to like..... aliens in maybee just the solarsystem next to us?

  • In space would small objects with less mass gravitate towards me?

  • @Emanusmell yeah!

  • @Emanusmell depends if there are other objects with more mass for it to gravitate towards.

  • This is such bullshit. Sure we can imagine anything and create stories of magical membranes and other dimensions, but we can't prove any of this. Why do we even have a theoretical physics field? We should just concentrate on shit we can actually see.

  • @LapisGarter dude stop mocking what you don't understand

  • @LapisGarter dude stop mocking what you don't understand just becauseyou don't understand it it doesn't mean its not true

  • @MrMig3 Nobody understands it. It's a theory.

  • @LapisGarter if the whole human population thought like you did we would still be living in a world where everybody thought earth was flat and the sun revolved around us... dumbass

  • @blurty16 At least we could see the sun and explore the Earth. There is absolutely nothing we can do to test for string theory. It's all science fiction.

  • @LapisGarter thats what the case was for einsteins theory of general relativity, untilhe had his final equations there was no known way to test for it. until the electron microscope, and large hadron collider, there was no way to test for lots of things! thats the great thing about human nature, and if you're thinking like this you simply are invaluable to society. and until the hubble telescope, we had almost no knowledge about the outer space! look how far we've come with "science fiction"

  • @blurty16 No, but this theory is literally impossible to test. There is absolutely no human technology that will ever be able to see things clearly at a quantum level. It's far beyond our limits. Not to mention, the whole field of quantum physics pretty much focuses on things outside our realm of reality. How can we possibly perceive something outside our reality?

  • @LapisGarter i see.....your problem is you have trouble comprehending the data presented to you?

    so since u do not understand it...u would be one of those people that ends up burning people for being witches.

  • hahaha, communicating with beeings "very close to us" from another dimension.... heavy stuff:D Any smokers here? Have you experienced such a thing?:)

  • I hate these things. They never answer questions for real. and their metaphors suck so badly...

  • @JayBlueToYou

    because us laymen wouldn't understand.... seriously, how many of us would be able to understand 4 dimensions of space, as shown by a tesseract, and even more.... if you wanna know for "real", major in physics....

  • Mabye dark matter is in fackt these other parallel universe

  • The more I watch this the less I believe it. 7 unobservable extra dimension. Gazillion of different strings, membranes, a loaf of of superuniverses,.... the only attractive part about string theory is that it supposedly is a quantum theory of gravity. But, mathematical beauty alone cannot convince me. Too many wild ideas. Occams razor is going to strip string theory naked.

  • @bhigr

    what you smoking? these wild ideas weren't made up and then they try to find a math for them... they arose from the equations themselves...

  • @litetheory

    Uhh....dude we have, turns out you just need a chair and some magnets :p

  • With all that knowledge and understanding... It's IMPOSSIBLE that we haven't developed flying saucers yet!

  • I dunno. These folksy similes like comparing reality to jelly seem a little dubious to me.

  • @carlsetzer

    it they talk about in terms of extra spatial dimensions, i think most wouldn't learn anything.... it's like giving a calculus problem to a pre-school kid...

  • @GreatImperium kim ung-yong solved an advanced calculus problem on japanese national television when he was four. stick that up your ass

  • So if the universe is a pool table, am I still jam?

  • I wonder if God (if he exists) is getting nervous bc we're beginning to get close to knowing how the shit works that he put us it.

  • This Possibility is Explained in Fringe (last episodes of 2nd season)

    Btw: Sheldon Lee Glashow makes me remember Sheldon Lee Cooper from "The Big Bang Theory" lol

  • Good video, pls look from part 01 or don't bother negative comment. At 2:53 => 2:59. I so lolled when I saw the smile on his face at 2:58. You can see he enjoyed the idea they would add special effects while he would do that gesture with his hands.BTW on the breadloaf or pooltable example comments. The reason why these examples seem so bad is because we are limited to our 3 space-dimensions to give an example.There is never going to be an example which will feel intuitive. If you have one,Share

  • nice ill call the aliens with my gravity phone and how do magnets work ?

  • nice ill call the aliens with my gravity phone

  • So, if you are a really bad pool player, you can accidentally knock particles off of the membrane!?!?

    They need to outlaw pool immediately! It's absurd that they still allow it!!!

    OH MY GOD WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON WILL POOL!!!!!!!! THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!!!!! DESTROY POOL IMMEDIATELY!!!!!!!!

    I'M GOING TO BURN DOWN ALL OF THE BARS AND POOL HALLS IN MY AREA. PLEASE HELP ME SAVE THE UNIVERSE!!!!!!

  • I don't understand how a rotary telephone works but I'm trying to understand M theory. I am such a sucker for punishment.