PeekSiegen peut être, mais moi dans cette experience ce qui me choc le plus c'est que les électrons modifient leur comportement en fonction de l'apareil de mesure et ça tu ne l'explique pas (du moins tu n'explique pas le "pourquoi" et je peu pas t'en vouloir sinon tu serais déjà prix nobel !)...C'est CA le plus étonnant...C'est vraiment surprenant...
J'ai bien ma propre théorie sur le fonctionnement de la physique quantique mais encore faut t'il le prouver :
Les electrons fonctionnent comme des ondes qui ne se croisent jamas. Arrivés devant les fentes, il n'en passent que deux (gauche et droite) mais dès leur sortie, ils se dupliquent sans jamais se croiser. Quant à l'appareil de mesure, il empêche la duplication des electrons.
Bonjour, je voudrais juste savoir quel est votre age, votre théorie sur la physique quantique est tout à a fait plausible et très intéressante. Pour ma part je suis en 1er S, je cherche à me documenter sur celle-ci en trouvant un peu de tout mais rien de pertinent. Et j'aimerai savoir si vous êtes vous même scientifique. Je vous remercie, cordialement.
because if we knew we were being watched we would not act with all our possable options! if someone was watching us we would act accordingly!proving particals are conscious like ourselves
not quite. actually, the simple act of observing is actually changing matter itself. so... according to quantum mechanics... we make reality into what we WANT it to look like or act. now doesn't THAT go against everything you have been taught? lol too bad we can't see the change of matter. because it only changes if we dont "see" it. kinda sucks, huh? :/
I thought I understood this, but seems I had it wrong. I thought the particles interfered with doubles in nearby dimensions (could that be the case?) to make the patterns. The part that blew my mind though, was the observation thing. What DOES observeration have to do with it? The fact that information is collected forces there to be only one outcome instead of multiple superimposed outcomes? This is madness! And I love it!
10 years new, really. Very good ries were made as soon as making electron tubes (like tube amps) was doable (it was done in 1488 or so) but since there was no built-in-self-test or reliable switching, all this looked like noise; as would have 1/8-electron hall effect observations. We still need to speed the presentation to match that of mechanical transformations math.
after swallowing some mushrooms I actually observed Quantum particles..they travel in strange directions, at different speeds, they reverse directions, slow down, disappear, reappear, etc..these particles seem to have a life of there own and are able to exist by their own rules..they may even be able to disappear here in front of your eyes and reappear at the other end of the universe in a split second!
What a mind job!
McBagginz 1 year ago
PeekSiegen peut être, mais moi dans cette experience ce qui me choc le plus c'est que les électrons modifient leur comportement en fonction de l'apareil de mesure et ça tu ne l'explique pas (du moins tu n'explique pas le "pourquoi" et je peu pas t'en vouloir sinon tu serais déjà prix nobel !)...C'est CA le plus étonnant...C'est vraiment surprenant...
bloodman93420 1 year ago
i hope we finnally discovert tthe graviton
kingpopaul 3 years ago
Hopefully we will! It will prove near-to everything!
Gerstein1 2 years ago
J'ai bien ma propre théorie sur le fonctionnement de la physique quantique mais encore faut t'il le prouver :
Les electrons fonctionnent comme des ondes qui ne se croisent jamas. Arrivés devant les fentes, il n'en passent que deux (gauche et droite) mais dès leur sortie, ils se dupliquent sans jamais se croiser. Quant à l'appareil de mesure, il empêche la duplication des electrons.
A vérifier...
PeekSiegen 3 years ago
Bonjour, je voudrais juste savoir quel est votre age, votre théorie sur la physique quantique est tout à a fait plausible et très intéressante. Pour ma part je suis en 1er S, je cherche à me documenter sur celle-ci en trouvant un peu de tout mais rien de pertinent. Et j'aimerai savoir si vous êtes vous même scientifique. Je vous remercie, cordialement.
DGSEagence 3 years ago
Bonjour, je suis PeekSiegen sous un autre pseudo, vous avez un nouveau mail sur youtube avec ce nouveau pseudo ;-)
lumene70 3 years ago
because if we knew we were being watched we would not act with all our possable options! if someone was watching us we would act accordingly!proving particals are conscious like ourselves
cronoron 3 years ago
not quite. actually, the simple act of observing is actually changing matter itself. so... according to quantum mechanics... we make reality into what we WANT it to look like or act. now doesn't THAT go against everything you have been taught? lol too bad we can't see the change of matter. because it only changes if we dont "see" it. kinda sucks, huh? :/
civicracer1989 3 years ago 2
Dr. Quantum looks a bit like Robert Englund
do5e 4 years ago
damn that was sick i need to re watch this movie
princedime11 4 years ago
photons are functions which have to be continuous over all space and all time.
an electron moving through space creates a deforming electric field, ie an electric wave, ie a photon.
by observing the electron electrically, we absorb a photon, or at the very least create a boundary condition on the photon function in 4 dimensions.
the new boundary condition redefines the entire equation of the photon instantaneously and everywhere, including all space and all time.
icn001 4 years ago 3
I thought I understood this, but seems I had it wrong. I thought the particles interfered with doubles in nearby dimensions (could that be the case?) to make the patterns. The part that blew my mind though, was the observation thing. What DOES observeration have to do with it? The fact that information is collected forces there to be only one outcome instead of multiple superimposed outcomes? This is madness! And I love it!
tratan3 4 years ago
10 years new, really. Very good ries were made as soon as making electron tubes (like tube amps) was doable (it was done in 1488 or so) but since there was no built-in-self-test or reliable switching, all this looked like noise; as would have 1/8-electron hall effect observations. We still need to speed the presentation to match that of mechanical transformations math.
Norvesterdqy 5 years ago
very intersting.has me baffled.
julescicle 5 years ago
wow! very intriguing.. I studied basic quantum physics some yrs back.. its good to refresh all that..
hanks12 5 years ago
after swallowing some mushrooms I actually observed Quantum particles..they travel in strange directions, at different speeds, they reverse directions, slow down, disappear, reappear, etc..these particles seem to have a life of there own and are able to exist by their own rules..they may even be able to disappear here in front of your eyes and reappear at the other end of the universe in a split second!
johnsmdm 5 years ago 2
Dude....that's not a scientific breakthrough, that's just a drug-induced hallucination....
MukashiOlin 4 years ago
So the wave potential is always there, it just needs an observer to colapse it.
upshall 5 years ago