I am writing this in my perception of NOW, and when you are reading it, it will be in my FUTURE. You are reading this in your perception of NOW, even though I wrote it in your perception of my PAST.
The scope of your reality is about to expand, but you already knew this. I am the aspect of you that has chosen to listen to the mathematical validity and incomprehension felt by those you imagined to feel as such. You made them balance, so that one may exist with all knowing, two may exist with exact contrast, and three may observe the difference. It is from these words that resonate so deeply with your perfect reality, that you may know, all beings worthy of your creation, will know they are.
@9innail Feel no loss over those that will never be aware. They will not even know there was an alternate awareness from their own, so they cannot feel loss over it. You can't lose something you didn't even know you had, or rather, you CAN, but you won't know you did.
So my view of "dimensions" is like an infinite 3-pronged revolution, each prong consisting of 3 more infinite revolutions. One prong is TIME: Past, Present, Future. One is Space: Here, There, In between, or "Everywhere", and the last is CONSCIOUSNESS: All Available information, The ability to process the meaning of the observance of the information, and the ability of free will to choose what one WISHES to believe regarding the information. That's 9. so the 1st can just as easily be called 10th.
@Thisisyourmomsname I think that the set of lower case "o" and the set of upper case "O" are the same infinity. Because they have the same cardinality. It would be the same infinity as the set of counting numbers since you can match every "o" to a rational number from 1 o's, 2 o's, 3 o's,...infinite o's. The infinite amount of irrational numbers between 0 and 1 is larger than the infinite amount of rational numbers from 0 to infinity. That is an example of a smaller infinity and a larger one.
@marsCubed I've talked about Parmenides a bit in my blog, but I don't think he made it into any of my video blogs. If you google his name and my last name you'll find some of the links.
@filmz101 now you're fucking with me. i don't want to be right, i just want to know. but sometimes the wrong assumptions can lead to a lot of wasted time.
everytime i watch a video of yours my blood pressure rises. im no physicist much less theoretical physicist but i tend to disagree with almost everything you say, even when we view the same resources the conclusions you derive are so off the charts that im tempted to unsubscribe, but you are searching and that's what i admire about any human being.
BUT here's a few things that you should keep in mind regardless what the white robes say:
1. there is NO infinity in our dimension/reality
2. BIG bang? multiple medium bangs (i see you concurred with my simulation paradigm and arbitrary seeding, pruning of galaxies, down to the creation of species)
3. matter is less than 1% of what matters
4. anything is possible in our reality, but the improbable dictates the outcome
5. multiverses ok, parallel realities HELLS 2 the no
@filmz101 our physical reality is generated by some kind of fractal system that gives it infinite resolution, but it is not infinitesimally,it has a base unit, which i refer to as reality's pixel which all matter is represented.
the 4d argument is simply a slippery slope, you cant mix temporal and spatial coordinates. and as many have said before me, there is no 0d, 1d, 2d our base unit is 3dimensional, paper is flat to us but it is by no means 3d. credibility.. lol, like this video has any
I'm begging to understand... so as squares are to cubes in 3d... are cubes to tesseracts in 4d... but they are just simple shapes... we are made up of many different shapes to give us our 3d bodies... so... beings in 4d must be made up of many different 4d shapes to adapt to their environments... and we would only a see a slice of them, like a flatlander would only see a slice of us in 2d... am I close?
hey rob ever since i saw your original video i have been thinking...
The 10th dinmension is a sort of boundry for our human mind right? Our mind can't go any higher. Then couldn't the 1st be not the lowest dimension, but another boundry? I am talking about a lower boundry for our mind. Could there be lower 3 dimensional set in the universe? Maybe even lower than that. I don't know i think i'm just crazy lol.
An alien species of any relevance to humans due to actually reaching us, would paradoxically be more likely than not, be of no relevance due to the fact that the only way interstellar travel could be possible is for extradimensional beings to be the ones traveling and therefor either be inaccessible to humans in our current dimensional constraints or uninterested in us as we would be with a creature of lower dimensions, say, a square.
Burchified. - You cannot have -2 apples, no matter how you rationalize it.
what if i gave two apples away?
then im down two.
i have subtracted a positive number, thus creating a negative number from a base of 0. or 8 if i had 8 apples, and then id have six, negative 2 from what i had.
if i had 8 apples. i can then say i have negative 2 apples because i know there are supposed to be 8. yes the 2 still exists, but not on my plane.
*shakes head* you are attempting to create a debate (I say debate because I'm assuming we are grown up and being mature) but you are attempting to this without incorporating all aspects of the debators and the realm of the debate. Two key words Burchified uses are "reality" and "applied". I ask you to look at it as "within application in our reality" you cannot produce the concreteness of -2. This is only an abstract creation. We cannot utilize this in concrete means.
And I also get that you said "but not on my plane" but again I revert back to "reality" and that you cannot go to a different plane. You, as a person, I do not believe has the ability to break the dimensional boundaries (as in spacial dimensions, not alternate world dimensions) to a place were the physics are not as absolute as ours, and give you the ability to have a -2.
I just thought of something. If the value for gravity could be different in alternate universes (not other spatial dimensions), then the value for gravity in theory could be a negative number and repulse instead of attract.
Why don't you go ask your bank where they get the money to loan to you? The answer should be called soft money which the federal reserve loans them. You might not like how the fed makes it either. Negative numbers do not exist. Period. Show me a negative apple. How big is it? What's it weigh.
negative numbers are considered imaginary because its hard to grasp the fact of negativity. tell me. can you even hold a one? a two? no. and i can show you a negative apple. hey look at this apple. now i put it behind my back and you cant see it. it weighs as it was, and remains the same size. but you cant see it. tho its still there. negative numbers are not the absence of numbers. and negative numbers in the bank. ha. what about debt? negative monies man...im sorry but youve been mistified
the apple is still there, bro. learn to spell too, please. negative numbers do not exist in reality. draw me a line -2", plant me a negative tree. only absolute values exist. i really love how so many people want to lay their claims here like we're talking about a matter of opinion. if you had taken ANY math past high school algebra, you would see exactly why im right. so quit trying to manipulate my examples to prove me wrong.
i know the apple is still there. when you spend your money its still there. you just dont have it in your sights. and i didnt intend to start a "debate" but you seem to not realize i have rationalized a way around this and theres no getting around that. we are both right. you cant plant a negative tree. but if i planted 4 and cut one down i have -1 tree. numbers are not a physical things anyway so we cannot bind its values to physical objects wholly without negative interaction. no pun intended.
from my knowledge absolute zero cant go below absolute zero. though i think it can, and if done, they would shatter, not from hitting each other because they arent moving the slightest bit. so they'd break into their individual atoms?!!? and maybe further fall into themselves?
and the credit you get is someone elses dollar from the bank.
The absolute zero thing is exactly my point, you cannot go below it. Absolute zero is simply when kinetic energy of a particle goes to zero. And as for the credit, look up the federal reserve and fractional reserve banking system. It does not come from anything other than someone else's debt.
or just clever? it was. but gotta point across. how about this. i buy a pack of cigs. theres 20 ina pack. i smoke one. i know have -1 ciggarette of 20. leaving the visible 19. Q: How Many Cigarettes Do You Have? A: Negative One. ( i know no body would say this) Sc1: .person thinks.. you owe somebody a cig?.. Sc2: .person thinks.. you have a pack with one out of it?.. hahah i have another, but i think me points be clear
Me and the rest of the math world. you keep jumping from saying negative numbers exist(which they don't), to saying they are "applied". Do us all a favor and shut the fuck up stupid cunt. I'm not even going to justify anything else you babble on about with a response. Good day.
@billybob1212 No, 0 does not exist - it's a concept, not a thing. Saying 0 is a real thing is like saying unicorns are real because the concept of a unicorn is real.
We use 0 to describe reality...it is not an actual *part* of reality.
@TheMightyCult You said it, they are concepts which are *describing* something which exists externally. Infinity is a concept, describing nature. Why? Because nature is infinite. We wouldn't ascribe a concept on something if that concept didn't fit our experience. You call them ideas, but the ideas are nothing more than reflections of things-in-themselves which exist independently of human thought. The world is expressed and reflected by our ideas. We do not create reality, only abide by it..
Exactly. Mathematics is simply our way to desperately try and define certain amounts of something, distribution of those amounts, and etc. Our perception of reality runs on what we notice as we travel through our time lines. We give it definition by what we notice. That is why physics and math exist.
MiStANEVADi, please read my comments from where this chain of comments started from. I hope you will come to understand, within a mature manner. I do not wish to start an argument, although debates (with creditable statements) are acceptable. Also scroll down some, and read the scientific "law" I have come up with, this might help with understanding some things.
Some fractals have edges with infinite surface area. And fractals are simply chaotic functions graphed in the Xi plane. Gabriel's horn in an example of a object with finite volume and infinite surface area. Maybe it is possible for the universe to have a definitive volume but infinife surface area.
As for you, a friendly little food for thought. I don't agree with that at all, as for the issue that even you said our math is definitely incomplete. I'm going to throw you a little "law" that I'm coming up with.
Whether of concrete or abstract existance, nothing of finite structure can be composed of an infinite composition. And inverse, nothing of infinite structure can be completely composed of finite composition.
infinite number of points between two points, yet still have ends?
i thought of this a while back: There's an infinite amount of time, between any given two points of time. between 1s and 2s is 1.2 and 1.21.... so on and so forth.
but we are still subjective and are bound to our perspectives.
@MiStANEVADi both our time and distance units are NOT infinitely divisble. quantum physics follows the laws of classical physics, but classical physics is 95% wrong hence the inability to unify fields
read up on nassim harameim for some good insight into where physics took shortcuts
yeah but at some point you breach that gap between 1 and 2 even if you break it down so infinitesimally small you still end up with a number short of infinite maybe what your brain deceives as reality and whatever your perspectives are bound to....is the actual truth in the matter.
@filmz101 there is NO infinity in this physical reality, the universe is not infinitely large, atoms arent infinitely divisible. the only thing i can't get is why people make whole videos about conjecture. this is all postulation
hmmmm.....again i may ask is your speculation of the universe even more correct than what a physicist with a PhD might say? and can you explain the infinite curvature of space time both or a multiuniverse theory, ill give you an easy representation of infinity imagine a universe with 0 friction now say an object is forced in one direction what is there to stop it? doesn't the mass allow it to proceed through space with no possible end?
@filmz101 they're called theoretical physicists for a reason. save everything i've said and in a decade or so, refrence it again as physicists start making break throughs. it doesnt start witha point, it starts with a thought. his analogies are the worst, slippery slopes and infinite logical fallacies, that's the only semblance of infinity i see,. even eisntein said that the universe may not be infinite, this just seems obvious to me, just like the intuitive physics we all use everyday
okay if you don't want me to reference from a theory than i don't want you to reference from theories. you have no proof that infinity doesn't exist and i have no proof that it does. you can give more examples than i but does that mean I'm wrong?
@filmz101 as long as its up for debate its liable to end in conjecture, unless its self evident then its any one's guess. sure we need to come up with intelligent hypotheses and show facts to prove them, but it doesnt really matter who's right, all i see is the ability to fathom the impossible manifesting as theories get shot down. this to me is wonderful insight considering i know nothing of what man is
Yes we each one of us is at the center and for some of us aliens are here and have been here for a long long time. It just requires waking up to infinite possibilities.
What you say (in general) touches me deeply. It does make sense in more than a "science" way. The "big picture" of the universe is as important in everyday life.
So, are we saying that bi-pedal, humanoid higher life forms are the more common version of higher life forms? Due to the first life that sprouted in the universe being a bi-pedal humanoid?
Mathematics may not exists in other intelligent civilizations. Mathematics as we know them originated from territorial tendencies and evolved from there, but our territorial tendencies come from the reptiles in our evolutionary history. Not all intelligent beings would have a similar evolutionary history to ours, and they may never have had a need for territorial tendencies, thus not all intelligent civilizations would have had a need for mathematics.
1 + 1 will always equal 2. One apple plus one apple equals two apples. A bag with three apples next to a bag with four apples results in there being twelve in all. These concepts and those that branch off from them do not change regardless of who you are, what you are, or where you are. Math is just counting made easy. Hell, animals do math. It's that basic and that universal.
I highly advise you to retake kindergarden. It may do you some good.
Maybe you caught this flaw, but you have to have 3 groups of bags of apples with 4 in each bag, or the other way around, not just 3 apples in a bag sitting next to a bag with 4 apples. That part is still 7,
The math humans use practically is an interpretation of the functions the universe uses. In reality, negative numbers do not actually exist. You cannot have -2 apples, no matter how you rationalize it. Our math is definitely incomplete, but we got it all by reverse engineering natural processes. And therefore math, or whatever one chooses to call it, exists. My bachelors in applied math beats your ill-informed opinions about math anyday.
I'm starting to believe that reality is just data, and living creatures are just things that take that data, mix it together, and make new data. Meaning that since data is reality, every thought we have is real. No matter what it is. And that is what the infinite expansion of our universe is, data combining with other data to make new data.
Imagining is great, as I am pretty sure that every thought, or idea we have that seems impossible today, could well be reality, or happen in the future.
I imagine intelligent life exists, but we will not detect it. Aliens could easily (if say just a 1000 years ahead of us in technology), ensure that we cant find waves from their planet(s) and choose what they want us to see thru our telescopes! Or until such time that detection could be handled by us, having only been a tech civ for 100yrs.
I just thought of the end of the universe (or the infinity of it) today =D
I was cycling in the mist and thought about how the mist prevented me from seeing further than 50 meter and that the world behind that could possibly just end there, but because of my memories I knew it didn't.
This would be the same thing in our universe. The edge of our universe we can see today with our technology might be the end of the universe, but it might also extend to the infinite.
The Atlantis team finds a program in the Atlantis database which throws Mckay and Sheppard into a Simsesque game that could destroy two civilizations in the Pegasus Galaxy.
this "game" could be similar to the simulation you were "suggesting", where a external force is simply simulating the universe... sadly i is to long to explain here, but you can see the episode and maybe see same parallels as me.
Most people don't know that all this is mainstream science today.
I think you are covering the most interesting part of science in a great way!
I also love the "outside the box"-thinking that is very important for science to survive. People that want to make science to some sort of religion that is only available to the elite will eventually put earth into a new dark age. I would like every human to be a part of this, to dare to talk about it just like you.
Back in the late 90s I had fun listening to Art Bell. None of my local stations carry Coast to Coast and I remember the last time I checked the Coast to Coast website they were charging for people to listen to archived shows. Is there something in particular you think I should be listening to?
you can find their new broadcasts on youtube for free. Lately they have talked more and more about Aliens and I thought you might have used that for some of your video.
I enjoy his videos. I think the question about him being a scientist is moot. This is obviously more scientific philosophy than it is pure materialist science. It's speculative and visionary. The question is what we as individuals - and what the scientific community in general - value more. I see nothing wrong with this type of approach to life and possibility. If you want to explain the process of boiling water, you turn to pure materialist science...
...But if you want to speculate the existence of multiple universes and the infinite possibilities of this universe, then you do what this guy is doing. Both are valuable and necessary.
Science is not materialist. Materialist metaphysics is. There need no reason to emphasize that water is material. Since matter cannot be defined as separate from energy and therefore from consciousness.
Materialist science is materialist. Hence the term "materialist science." Basic science deals with matter on the observable level. It doesn't deal with conjecture or probability or speculation. Therefore it is inherently materialist. Scientific philosophy, however, speculates beyond the material plane.
Water is material and that's important if you're dealing with the material plane. But if you want to talk about the unobservable energy of water, you have to go beyond the material.
Since most of this blog is a direct quote from Sir Martin Rees, professor of cosmology and astrophysics and master of Trinity College at the University of Cambridge, why do you disagree with him?
The title made me laugh:P
piloooogen 4 months ago
When I watch your videos, it feels like the knowledge is not only coming from you, but from within myself as well.
supergsx 1 year ago
I am writing this in my perception of NOW, and when you are reading it, it will be in my FUTURE. You are reading this in your perception of NOW, even though I wrote it in your perception of my PAST.
9innail 1 year ago
The scope of your reality is about to expand, but you already knew this. I am the aspect of you that has chosen to listen to the mathematical validity and incomprehension felt by those you imagined to feel as such. You made them balance, so that one may exist with all knowing, two may exist with exact contrast, and three may observe the difference. It is from these words that resonate so deeply with your perfect reality, that you may know, all beings worthy of your creation, will know they are.
9innail 1 year ago
@9innail Feel no loss over those that will never be aware. They will not even know there was an alternate awareness from their own, so they cannot feel loss over it. You can't lose something you didn't even know you had, or rather, you CAN, but you won't know you did.
9innail 1 year ago
So my view of "dimensions" is like an infinite 3-pronged revolution, each prong consisting of 3 more infinite revolutions. One prong is TIME: Past, Present, Future. One is Space: Here, There, In between, or "Everywhere", and the last is CONSCIOUSNESS: All Available information, The ability to process the meaning of the observance of the information, and the ability of free will to choose what one WISHES to believe regarding the information. That's 9. so the 1st can just as easily be called 10th.
9innail 1 year ago
Would another way to think about differant sizes of infinity be to picture say:
oooooooooooooooooooo.... (an infinity of a lowercase "o")
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO..... (as apose to a differant infinity of upercase "O")
if that makes sense lol
Thisisyourmomsname 1 year ago
@Thisisyourmomsname I think that the set of lower case "o" and the set of upper case "O" are the same infinity. Because they have the same cardinality. It would be the same infinity as the set of counting numbers since you can match every "o" to a rational number from 1 o's, 2 o's, 3 o's,...infinite o's. The infinite amount of irrational numbers between 0 and 1 is larger than the infinite amount of rational numbers from 0 to infinity. That is an example of a smaller infinity and a larger one.
Audiophilia07 1 year ago
@Audiophilia07 alright that kinda makes sense, thanks
Thisisyourmomsname 1 year ago
10thdim
Have a look at the ideas of Parmenides, if you have not done so already.
You may find them very interesting.
Many of the ideas we have in modern science come from his concepts of infinity.
marsCubed 1 year ago
@marsCubed I've talked about Parmenides a bit in my blog, but I don't think he made it into any of my video blogs. If you google his name and my last name you'll find some of the links.
Thanks for writing!
Rob Bryanton
10thdim 1 year ago
lol at the disclaimer
tombkreeper3 2 years ago
i smoke weed and watch this... it's like information sex.
12GaugeLosAngeles 2 years ago 24
@12GaugeLosAngeles weed led me to this video, without weed i wouldnt be wathin this type of stuff
ihateslideshows 1 year ago
Dude I was just fucking with you it was obvious you were right all along.
filmz101 2 years ago
@filmz101 now you're fucking with me. i don't want to be right, i just want to know. but sometimes the wrong assumptions can lead to a lot of wasted time.
part2themovie 2 years ago
im sorry that last comment was made by my douche bag friend....sorry
filmz101 2 years ago
Did anyone buy that?
tombkreeper3 2 years ago
everytime i watch a video of yours my blood pressure rises. im no physicist much less theoretical physicist but i tend to disagree with almost everything you say, even when we view the same resources the conclusions you derive are so off the charts that im tempted to unsubscribe, but you are searching and that's what i admire about any human being.
part2themovie 2 years ago
@part2themovie
BUT here's a few things that you should keep in mind regardless what the white robes say:
1. there is NO infinity in our dimension/reality
2. BIG bang? multiple medium bangs (i see you concurred with my simulation paradigm and arbitrary seeding, pruning of galaxies, down to the creation of species)
3. matter is less than 1% of what matters
4. anything is possible in our reality, but the improbable dictates the outcome
5. multiverses ok, parallel realities HELLS 2 the no
part2themovie 2 years ago
do you have any more credibility that your speculations might be more correct than his?
filmz101 2 years ago
@filmz101 our physical reality is generated by some kind of fractal system that gives it infinite resolution, but it is not infinitesimally,it has a base unit, which i refer to as reality's pixel which all matter is represented.
the 4d argument is simply a slippery slope, you cant mix temporal and spatial coordinates. and as many have said before me, there is no 0d, 1d, 2d our base unit is 3dimensional, paper is flat to us but it is by no means 3d. credibility.. lol, like this video has any
part2themovie 2 years ago
this is soooo hard to follow
olhakio 2 years ago
@olhakio because he's wrong about everything but his name, which he might be lying about
part2themovie 2 years ago
...negative numbers are real...
...they merely exist in an alternate universe...
...wrap your heads around it !...
...how long did we use Roman Numerals, which cannot even comprehend 0 ?...
Will224000 2 years ago
...you don't want to think like a Flatlander all of your lives !...
Will224000 2 years ago
I'm begging to understand... so as squares are to cubes in 3d... are cubes to tesseracts in 4d... but they are just simple shapes... we are made up of many different shapes to give us our 3d bodies... so... beings in 4d must be made up of many different 4d shapes to adapt to their environments... and we would only a see a slice of them, like a flatlander would only see a slice of us in 2d... am I close?
somebuddycool 2 years ago
hey rob ever since i saw your original video i have been thinking...
The 10th dinmension is a sort of boundry for our human mind right? Our mind can't go any higher. Then couldn't the 1st be not the lowest dimension, but another boundry? I am talking about a lower boundry for our mind. Could there be lower 3 dimensional set in the universe? Maybe even lower than that. I don't know i think i'm just crazy lol.
FreezingSun14 2 years ago
An alien species of any relevance to humans due to actually reaching us, would paradoxically be more likely than not, be of no relevance due to the fact that the only way interstellar travel could be possible is for extradimensional beings to be the ones traveling and therefor either be inaccessible to humans in our current dimensional constraints or uninterested in us as we would be with a creature of lower dimensions, say, a square.
boredman443 2 years ago
Burchified. - You cannot have -2 apples, no matter how you rationalize it.
what if i gave two apples away?
then im down two.
i have subtracted a positive number, thus creating a negative number from a base of 0. or 8 if i had 8 apples, and then id have six, negative 2 from what i had.
if i had 8 apples. i can then say i have negative 2 apples because i know there are supposed to be 8. yes the 2 still exists, but not on my plane.
MiStANEVADi 2 years ago
Comment removed
TheUltimatePike 2 years ago
*shakes head* you are attempting to create a debate (I say debate because I'm assuming we are grown up and being mature) but you are attempting to this without incorporating all aspects of the debators and the realm of the debate. Two key words Burchified uses are "reality" and "applied". I ask you to look at it as "within application in our reality" you cannot produce the concreteness of -2. This is only an abstract creation. We cannot utilize this in concrete means.
TheUltimatePike 2 years ago
And I also get that you said "but not on my plane" but again I revert back to "reality" and that you cannot go to a different plane. You, as a person, I do not believe has the ability to break the dimensional boundaries (as in spacial dimensions, not alternate world dimensions) to a place were the physics are not as absolute as ours, and give you the ability to have a -2.
TheUltimatePike 2 years ago
I'm glad you used the word "believe". :)
burchified 2 years ago
I just thought of something. If the value for gravity could be different in alternate universes (not other spatial dimensions), then the value for gravity in theory could be a negative number and repulse instead of attract.
MunchVids 2 years ago
i wasnt speeking of other-dimensional planes.
i was speaking of vision range.
plane of sight.
MiStANEVADi 2 years ago
Saying that is the same as saying 8=-2. Negative numbers do not actually exist. Take a calculus class if/when you go to college.
burchified 2 years ago
Go tell the bank that loaned me the money for my house and my car that negative numbers don't really exist :P
s2kburbs 2 years ago
Why don't you go ask your bank where they get the money to loan to you? The answer should be called soft money which the federal reserve loans them. You might not like how the fed makes it either. Negative numbers do not exist. Period. Show me a negative apple. How big is it? What's it weigh.
burchified 2 years ago
negative numbers are considered imaginary because its hard to grasp the fact of negativity. tell me. can you even hold a one? a two? no. and i can show you a negative apple. hey look at this apple. now i put it behind my back and you cant see it. it weighs as it was, and remains the same size. but you cant see it. tho its still there. negative numbers are not the absence of numbers. and negative numbers in the bank. ha. what about debt? negative monies man...im sorry but youve been mistified
MiStANEVADi 2 years ago
the apple is still there, bro. learn to spell too, please. negative numbers do not exist in reality. draw me a line -2", plant me a negative tree. only absolute values exist. i really love how so many people want to lay their claims here like we're talking about a matter of opinion. if you had taken ANY math past high school algebra, you would see exactly why im right. so quit trying to manipulate my examples to prove me wrong.
burchified 2 years ago
i know the apple is still there. when you spend your money its still there. you just dont have it in your sights. and i didnt intend to start a "debate" but you seem to not realize i have rationalized a way around this and theres no getting around that. we are both right. you cant plant a negative tree. but if i planted 4 and cut one down i have -1 tree. numbers are not a physical things anyway so we cannot bind its values to physical objects wholly without negative interaction. no pun intended.
MiStANEVADi 2 years ago
Let's examine this again. Say Joe has 5 dollars and wants to buy a toy that costs 6 dollars. The only damn way that toys' going home with Joe is if:
a:he steals it (irrelevant)
b: he gets a credit, which is nothing more than a NON-PHYSICAL IDEA!!!
c: he waits until he has 6 dollars, which would thereby reduce his REAL available money to 0.
Need more proof? ask a chemist what happens to molecules that temperature goes below absolute zero, into the negative.
burchified 2 years ago
from my knowledge absolute zero cant go below absolute zero. though i think it can, and if done, they would shatter, not from hitting each other because they arent moving the slightest bit. so they'd break into their individual atoms?!!? and maybe further fall into themselves?
and the credit you get is someone elses dollar from the bank.
MiStANEVADi 2 years ago
The absolute zero thing is exactly my point, you cannot go below it. Absolute zero is simply when kinetic energy of a particle goes to zero. And as for the credit, look up the federal reserve and fractional reserve banking system. It does not come from anything other than someone else's debt.
burchified 2 years ago
yeah. but change that base of zero of which cant go below to another zero along the line. say -273 deg.K to 0 Deg.C. go back a degree. -1 deg.C.
MiStANEVADi 2 years ago
273 deg.K.
my b.
sign error
MiStANEVADi 2 years ago
Comment removed
MiStANEVADi 2 years ago
that one is so stupid, i cant even think of something stupider to say back.
burchified 2 years ago
MiStANEVADi 2 years ago
naw, its stupid. you dont have to keep explaining it either. negative numbers dont exist. you cant prove they do. I win.
burchified 2 years ago
hahahahahahahaaa.
hahahahahahahahahaaa.
i reject your reality and substitute my own.
of which is of the same reality.
ignorantasslicksss
now me in this.
thats arrogance at its elegance.
you just cant accept my application of negative numbers in the physical world.
MiStANEVADi 2 years ago
Me and the rest of the math world. you keep jumping from saying negative numbers exist(which they don't), to saying they are "applied". Do us all a favor and shut the fuck up stupid cunt. I'm not even going to justify anything else you babble on about with a response. Good day.
burchified 2 years ago
good'ay mate.
=]
whats done with positive numbers?
applied to day to day life!!?..
if you read what i stated against, of which is what you wrote, you will see that i have Rationalized a way around it. so, I Win.
Just Because You Have A Degree In Applied Math Doesnt Meen Shit Ass Wipe. =] such a childish term. but i felt you deserved it, Cuntface.
so ill stop giving concrete examples of negative numbers to make you happy.
we'll let the commenters decide
Hugs And Kisses Goodnight =*
JuggaLaunny 2 years ago
yeh this is me, i was on the wrong profile.
but think it was pretty clear that it was me=]
MiStANEVADi 2 years ago
I just stumbled across this convo and found it interesting.
It's true that negative numbers do not exist. But positive numbers do not exist either, nor does zero or infinity.
These are all merely concepts we use to describe groups of objects in reality - they are not actual things. They are ideas.
You cannot have 'a seventeen', you can only have seventeen OF something.
'The map is not the territory', as they say.
TheMightyCult 2 years ago 5
And coincidentally, a couple of weeks after I put this video up, I put one up called "The Map and the Territory".
watch?v=7OR7meRm71w
Thanks for writing!
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
@TheMightyCult does 0 exist?
billybob1212 1 year ago
@billybob1212 No, 0 does not exist - it's a concept, not a thing. Saying 0 is a real thing is like saying unicorns are real because the concept of a unicorn is real.
We use 0 to describe reality...it is not an actual *part* of reality.
TheMightyCult 1 year ago
@TheMightyCult 0 describes the absence of something.
Unicorns describe a creature.
CarlosMarti123 10 months ago
@TheMightyCult You said it, they are concepts which are *describing* something which exists externally. Infinity is a concept, describing nature. Why? Because nature is infinite. We wouldn't ascribe a concept on something if that concept didn't fit our experience. You call them ideas, but the ideas are nothing more than reflections of things-in-themselves which exist independently of human thought. The world is expressed and reflected by our ideas. We do not create reality, only abide by it..
Kasu1917 1 year ago
@TheMightyCult
Exactly. Mathematics is simply our way to desperately try and define certain amounts of something, distribution of those amounts, and etc. Our perception of reality runs on what we notice as we travel through our time lines. We give it definition by what we notice. That is why physics and math exist.
AngelixArch 5 months ago
Come on dude mistanevadi, at least mix it up a bit, "I substitute your reality and substitute my own" you make Adam look bad
tombkreeper3 2 years ago
MiStANEVADi, please read my comments from where this chain of comments started from. I hope you will come to understand, within a mature manner. I do not wish to start an argument, although debates (with creditable statements) are acceptable. Also scroll down some, and read the scientific "law" I have come up with, this might help with understanding some things.
TheUltimatePike 2 years ago
to every concious being capable of existing, the universe is unique to the individual.
math is the only medium that will not conflict with peoples opinions. math has no opinion. therefore no emotion that would give false truth.
so, if an alien race were to find us, they would not deal with a species that is ruled by primitive emotion.
they would be ruled by the principals of math, and would be technologicaly incapable of mistakes because they would have merged with their technology.
lynntinymite2 2 years ago
Some fractals have edges with infinite surface area. And fractals are simply chaotic functions graphed in the Xi plane. Gabriel's horn in an example of a object with finite volume and infinite surface area. Maybe it is possible for the universe to have a definitive volume but infinife surface area.
burchified 2 years ago
As for you, a friendly little food for thought. I don't agree with that at all, as for the issue that even you said our math is definitely incomplete. I'm going to throw you a little "law" that I'm coming up with.
Whether of concrete or abstract existance, nothing of finite structure can be composed of an infinite composition. And inverse, nothing of infinite structure can be completely composed of finite composition.
Just work with that for a little while.
TheUltimatePike 2 years ago
Get a math degree then we'll talk.
burchified 2 years ago
i agree.
yet also the other way around.
Quantum Physics.
Its Everything It Could Be Whilst Being One.
stop and think.
infinite number of points between two points, yet still have ends?
i thought of this a while back: There's an infinite amount of time, between any given two points of time. between 1s and 2s is 1.2 and 1.21.... so on and so forth.
but we are still subjective and are bound to our perspectives.
MiStANEVADi 2 years ago
@MiStANEVADi both our time and distance units are NOT infinitely divisble. quantum physics follows the laws of classical physics, but classical physics is 95% wrong hence the inability to unify fields
read up on nassim harameim for some good insight into where physics took shortcuts
part2themovie 2 years ago
ok. so i did.
watchd the video off of imaginingthetenthdimension.
and i was pretty much told it is.
so can you inform me otherwise?
cuz im pretty sure that one meter cut in half is .5m and so on and so forth.
the measurements just become so minuscule it negligible, from our stand point that is.
MiStANEVADi 2 years ago
yeah but at some point you breach that gap between 1 and 2 even if you break it down so infinitesimally small you still end up with a number short of infinite maybe what your brain deceives as reality and whatever your perspectives are bound to....is the actual truth in the matter.
filmz101 2 years ago
@filmz101 there is NO infinity in this physical reality, the universe is not infinitely large, atoms arent infinitely divisible. the only thing i can't get is why people make whole videos about conjecture. this is all postulation
part2themovie 2 years ago
hmmmm.....again i may ask is your speculation of the universe even more correct than what a physicist with a PhD might say? and can you explain the infinite curvature of space time both or a multiuniverse theory, ill give you an easy representation of infinity imagine a universe with 0 friction now say an object is forced in one direction what is there to stop it? doesn't the mass allow it to proceed through space with no possible end?
filmz101 2 years ago
@filmz101 they're called theoretical physicists for a reason. save everything i've said and in a decade or so, refrence it again as physicists start making break throughs. it doesnt start witha point, it starts with a thought. his analogies are the worst, slippery slopes and infinite logical fallacies, that's the only semblance of infinity i see,. even eisntein said that the universe may not be infinite, this just seems obvious to me, just like the intuitive physics we all use everyday
part2themovie 2 years ago
okay if you don't want me to reference from a theory than i don't want you to reference from theories. you have no proof that infinity doesn't exist and i have no proof that it does. you can give more examples than i but does that mean I'm wrong?
filmz101 2 years ago
@filmz101 as long as its up for debate its liable to end in conjecture, unless its self evident then its any one's guess. sure we need to come up with intelligent hypotheses and show facts to prove them, but it doesnt really matter who's right, all i see is the ability to fathom the impossible manifesting as theories get shot down. this to me is wonderful insight considering i know nothing of what man is
part2themovie 2 years ago
I like your clever word play but besides that your not furthering yourself in your argument.
filmz101 2 years ago
Yes we each one of us is at the center and for some of us aliens are here and have been here for a long long time. It just requires waking up to infinite possibilities.
291006058 2 years ago
Rob.
Thank you.
What you say (in general) touches me deeply. It does make sense in more than a "science" way. The "big picture" of the universe is as important in everyday life.
jazzguitarlessonsnet 2 years ago
So, are we saying that bi-pedal, humanoid higher life forms are the more common version of higher life forms? Due to the first life that sprouted in the universe being a bi-pedal humanoid?
Interesting.
overclock8586 2 years ago
maybe thats why the enterprise always found humanoids on far away planets.
ericsbuds 2 years ago
Universal Turing Machine, within an Universal Turing Machine
DracoRenaissance 2 years ago
Mathematics may not exists in other intelligent civilizations. Mathematics as we know them originated from territorial tendencies and evolved from there, but our territorial tendencies come from the reptiles in our evolutionary history. Not all intelligent beings would have a similar evolutionary history to ours, and they may never have had a need for territorial tendencies, thus not all intelligent civilizations would have had a need for mathematics.
JoMutt 2 years ago
Mathematics is a human invention, created to satisfy a human need.
JoMutt 2 years ago
No. Just no.
1 + 1 will always equal 2. One apple plus one apple equals two apples. A bag with three apples next to a bag with four apples results in there being twelve in all. These concepts and those that branch off from them do not change regardless of who you are, what you are, or where you are. Math is just counting made easy. Hell, animals do math. It's that basic and that universal.
I highly advise you to retake kindergarden. It may do you some good.
SgtHydra 2 years ago
Maybe you caught this flaw, but you have to have 3 groups of bags of apples with 4 in each bag, or the other way around, not just 3 apples in a bag sitting next to a bag with 4 apples. That part is still 7,
TheUltimatePike 2 years ago
Comment removed
MiStANEVADi 2 years ago
The math humans use practically is an interpretation of the functions the universe uses. In reality, negative numbers do not actually exist. You cannot have -2 apples, no matter how you rationalize it. Our math is definitely incomplete, but we got it all by reverse engineering natural processes. And therefore math, or whatever one chooses to call it, exists. My bachelors in applied math beats your ill-informed opinions about math anyday.
burchified 2 years ago
wow... I didn't know so many people liked bashing the opinions of 17 year old girls...
JoMutt 2 years ago
I didn't know math was based upon opinions. This isn't analytical statistics, it's basic arithmetic. Youre still cute tho.
burchified 2 years ago
I'm starting to believe that reality is just data, and living creatures are just things that take that data, mix it together, and make new data. Meaning that since data is reality, every thought we have is real. No matter what it is. And that is what the infinite expansion of our universe is, data combining with other data to make new data.
JarethGT 2 years ago
nice video, martin rees is always a welcome to your video.
and I see some proper causality in your ideas
rmeddy1 2 years ago
Agree with LanteanKnight ! Our eyes are metephorically 'just opening'!
nemesis76689 2 years ago
Imagining is great, as I am pretty sure that every thought, or idea we have that seems impossible today, could well be reality, or happen in the future.
I imagine intelligent life exists, but we will not detect it. Aliens could easily (if say just a 1000 years ahead of us in technology), ensure that we cant find waves from their planet(s) and choose what they want us to see thru our telescopes! Or until such time that detection could be handled by us, having only been a tech civ for 100yrs.
nemesis76689 2 years ago
I just thought of the end of the universe (or the infinity of it) today =D
I was cycling in the mist and thought about how the mist prevented me from seeing further than 50 meter and that the world behind that could possibly just end there, but because of my memories I knew it didn't.
This would be the same thing in our universe. The edge of our universe we can see today with our technology might be the end of the universe, but it might also extend to the infinite.
LanteanKnight 2 years ago 2
yes i know it is a movie ...
Stargate: Atlantis Season 3, Episode 15
Plot:
The Atlantis team finds a program in the Atlantis database which throws Mckay and Sheppard into a Simsesque game that could destroy two civilizations in the Pegasus Galaxy.
this "game" could be similar to the simulation you were "suggesting", where a external force is simply simulating the universe... sadly i is to long to explain here, but you can see the episode and maybe see same parallels as me.
-Thanks
fannoj 2 years ago
Another stellar one, Rob.
patternsinchaos 2 years ago
Most people don't know that all this is mainstream science today.
I think you are covering the most interesting part of science in a great way!
I also love the "outside the box"-thinking that is very important for science to survive. People that want to make science to some sort of religion that is only available to the elite will eventually put earth into a new dark age. I would like every human to be a part of this, to dare to talk about it just like you.
clarkcolt45 2 years ago 7
Hey Rob do you listen to Coast to Coast AM?
eyofirsttrumpet 2 years ago
Back in the late 90s I had fun listening to Art Bell. None of my local stations carry Coast to Coast and I remember the last time I checked the Coast to Coast website they were charging for people to listen to archived shows. Is there something in particular you think I should be listening to?
Rob
10thdim 2 years ago
Really interesting one today Rob. look forward to the next.
BinaryReader 2 years ago
you can find their new broadcasts on youtube for free. Lately they have talked more and more about Aliens and I thought you might have used that for some of your video.
eyofirsttrumpet 2 years ago
I enjoy his videos. I think the question about him being a scientist is moot. This is obviously more scientific philosophy than it is pure materialist science. It's speculative and visionary. The question is what we as individuals - and what the scientific community in general - value more. I see nothing wrong with this type of approach to life and possibility. If you want to explain the process of boiling water, you turn to pure materialist science...
ClearMindDontKnow 2 years ago
...But if you want to speculate the existence of multiple universes and the infinite possibilities of this universe, then you do what this guy is doing. Both are valuable and necessary.
ClearMindDontKnow 2 years ago
Science is not materialist. Materialist metaphysics is. There need no reason to emphasize that water is material. Since matter cannot be defined as separate from energy and therefore from consciousness.
1PostPoMoMaN1 2 years ago
What?
Materialist science is materialist. Hence the term "materialist science." Basic science deals with matter on the observable level. It doesn't deal with conjecture or probability or speculation. Therefore it is inherently materialist. Scientific philosophy, however, speculates beyond the material plane.
Water is material and that's important if you're dealing with the material plane. But if you want to talk about the unobservable energy of water, you have to go beyond the material.
ClearMindDontKnow 2 years ago
Oh you win this terminology war. :) An important victory.
MaBu888 2 years ago
as a physics major... I am crying.
Ykoahi 2 years ago
Since most of this blog is a direct quote from Sir Martin Rees, professor of cosmology and astrophysics and master of Trinity College at the University of Cambridge, why do you disagree with him?
10thdim 2 years ago
you shud've been a drama major
justforwatchingcraps 2 years ago 2
Amazing!!
kronweed 2 years ago 3
Awsome, i appreciate you taking a time to do all these videos !
greeksdorok 2 years ago 5
love these videos
SDMagicMan 2 years ago 4
are you a scientist ???
yoon715 2 years ago
._.
TomRaphaelWolf 2 years ago
he is not. you can tell.
Ykoahi 2 years ago
???
heyim89yearsold 2 years ago
What happened to the floating head?
Swordfyre 2 years ago
lol
Muchodelcrazy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1st
nagoshi01 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
retard.
xGundamz 2 years ago